8
San Francisco Arts Commission Civic Design Review REQUEST FOR REVIEW To be submitted to the Civic Design Review Program Manager prior to review. PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT TITLE ____________________________________________________________ DATE ______________ CLIENT DEPARTMENT & DIVISION: __________________________________________________________________ PROJECT LOCATION _____________________________________________________________________________ NAME, TITLE AND AFFILIATION OF INDIVIDUALS PRESENTING THE PROJECT: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROJECTED SCHEDULE Informational presentation: _______________ Phase 1: _____________________________ Phase 2: _____________________________ Phase 3: _____________________________ Construction Commencement: ____________ Construction Completion: _______________ PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD: Design, Bid Build (traditional) Fast Track Design-Build Bridging Other Total Construction Cost: _____________________ Approximate Structure size: ______________ sq f REVIEW TYPE OF REVIEW REQUESTED: Informational presentation PHASE 1: Conceptual design PHASE 2: Design Development PHASE 3: Construction Documents DESIGN CONCEPT: Please provide a succinct description of the design concept or philosophy and influences that inform the design. _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________ IS THIS PROJECT PART OF A BOND OR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM? YES NO If yes, when was the bond overview presented to the Committee? ___________ If the bond overview has not been previously presented to the Committee, please contact the Program Manager. CHANGES: Please briefly list the changes to the design since the last review (if applicable). _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: Please list the general materials proposed for construction. _________________________________________________________________________________________________ COMMUNITY OUTREACH: Has the community been invited to participate in the Civic Design Review process? Yes No It is your obligation to notify the surrounding community (by mail or email) that there is opportunity for public comment at the meeting so that the Civic Design Committee may have the benefit of their input. FEES 2010/2011 Cost Estimates For each Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 meeting: $2,316 (Informational presentations are exempt) Specially arranged consultations with staff and commissioners: $848 Journal Entry should be paid to: Index code: 28ADM516 Project: PAR516 Detail: 60127 Write checks to: San Francisco Arts Commission

Civic Design Review To be submitted to the Civic Design Review … › ... › 3_sfmta_cdr_2.11.13.pdf · 2020-01-02 · building design & construction s.f. department of public works

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Civic Design Review To be submitted to the Civic Design Review … › ... › 3_sfmta_cdr_2.11.13.pdf · 2020-01-02 · building design & construction s.f. department of public works

San Francisco Arts CommissionCivic Design Review

REQUEST FOR REVIEWTo be submitted to the Civic Design Review

Program Manager prior to review.

PROJECT INFORMATION

PROJECT TITLE ____________________________________________________________ DATE ______________

CLIENT DEPARTMENT & DIVISION: __________________________________________________________________

PROJECT LOCATION _____________________________________________________________________________

NAME, TITLE AND AFFILIATION OF INDIVIDUALS PRESENTING THE PROJECT:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

PROJECTED SCHEDULEInformational presentation: _______________Phase 1: _____________________________Phase 2: _____________________________Phase 3: _____________________________Construction Commencement: ____________Construction Completion: _______________

PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD: Design, Bid Build (traditional) Fast Track Design-Build Bridging Other

Total Construction Cost: _____________________

Approximate Structure size: ______________ sq fREVIEWTYPE OF REVIEW REQUESTED:

Informational presentation PHASE 1: Conceptual design PHASE 2: Design Development PHASE 3: Construction Documents

DESIGNCONCEPT: Please provide a succinct description of the design concept or philosophy and influences that inform thedesign.__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

IS THIS PROJECT PART OF A BOND OR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM? YES NOIf yes, when was the bond overview presented to the Committee? ___________If the bond overview has not been previously presented to the Committee, please contact the Program Manager.

CHANGES: Please briefly list the changes to the design since the last review (if applicable).__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: Please list the general materials proposed for construction._________________________________________________________________________________________________

COMMUNITY OUTREACH: Has the community been invited to participate in the Civic Design Review process? Yes NoIt is your obligation to notify the surrounding community (by mail or email) that there is opportunity for publiccomment at the meeting so that the Civic Design Committee may have the benefit of their input.

FEES2010/2011 Cost EstimatesFor each Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 meeting: $2,316(Informational presentations are exempt)Specially arranged consultations with staff andcommissioners: $848

Journal Entry should be paid to:Index code: 28ADM516Project: PAR516Detail: 60127Write checks to: San Francisco Arts Commission

Page 2: Civic Design Review To be submitted to the Civic Design Review … › ... › 3_sfmta_cdr_2.11.13.pdf · 2020-01-02 · building design & construction s.f. department of public works

BUILDING DESIGN & CONSTRUCTIONS.F. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSARCHITECTURE

SFMTA - OPERATOR CONVENIENCE FACILITIES Design DevelopmentFebruary 11, 2013 1

SFMTA - OPERATOR CONVENIENCE FACILITIESCIVIC DESIGN REVIEW

PHASE II & IIIFEBRUARY 11, 2013

Page 3: Civic Design Review To be submitted to the Civic Design Review … › ... › 3_sfmta_cdr_2.11.13.pdf · 2020-01-02 · building design & construction s.f. department of public works

BUILDING DESIGN & CONSTRUCTIONS.F. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSARCHITECTURE

SFMTA - OPERATOR CONVENIENCE FACILITIES Design DevelopmentFebruary 11, 2013

2PROJECT LOCATIONS

DESIGN CRITERIA:

TEMPORARY / PREFABRICATED FACILITIES

NEW LOCATION:

-ADA ACCESSIBLE

-DEPENDENT ON SERVICE VOLUME AT SPECIFIC LOCATIONS

-DIRECT CONNECTION TO CITY UTILITIES WITH THE POSSIBILITY OF RELOCATION IF TERMIAL LOCATION CHANGES

1. #1 CALIFORNIA GEARY & 32ND AVE

NORTH

GEARY & 32ND AVE

Page 4: Civic Design Review To be submitted to the Civic Design Review … › ... › 3_sfmta_cdr_2.11.13.pdf · 2020-01-02 · building design & construction s.f. department of public works

BUILDING DESIGN & CONSTRUCTIONS.F. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSARCHITECTURE

SFMTA - OPERATOR CONVENIENCE FACILITIES Design DevelopmentFebruary 11, 2013 3

METAL LOUVERSMETAL LOUVERSMETAL LOUVERS

scale=1/4"scale=1/4"

METAL LOUVERS

BACK ELEVATION

FLOOR PLAN - SINGLE OCCUPANCY- BASIC MODULE

MA

INE

NTR

Y

R =

20'

0"

11' 4"

2' 0" 6' 6" 1' 6"

8' 7

"

7' 4

"

scale=1/4"

UTILITY/PLUMBING CHASE

MATERIALS & COLOR SCHEMES

TUC

CO

WA

LL

MTL

. PA

NE

L W

ALL

MTL

. DO

OR

KA

LWA

LL

MTL

. PLA

TE

TEMPORARY/ PREFABRICATED FACILITIES

WALLS: C.M.U. WALLS WITH CEMENT PLASTER. PAINT & ANTIGRAFFITI COATING.INTERIOR FINISH: EXPOSED CMU W/ EPOXY PAINT.DOORS: GALVANIZED METAL DOORS, PAINTED.NATURAL ILUMINATION: KALWALL.VENTILATION: METAL LOUVERS & MECHANICAL EXHAUST FAN.LIGHTING: INTERIOR - MOTION ACTIVATED LIGHT, EXTERIOR - RECESSED CEILING LIGHT.FLOOR: EXPOSED CONCRETE.

DESIGN CRITERIA

EQ

.E

Q.

EQ

.E

Q.

8' 7

"

2"

1' 0

"7'

7"

FRONT ELEVATION

SINGLE OCCUPANCY - BASIC MODULE

LEFT ELEVATION

9' 1

"

8' 7

"

RIGHT ELEVATION

BASIC MODULE DESIGN

Page 5: Civic Design Review To be submitted to the Civic Design Review … › ... › 3_sfmta_cdr_2.11.13.pdf · 2020-01-02 · building design & construction s.f. department of public works

BUILDING DESIGN & CONSTRUCTIONS.F. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSARCHITECTURE

SFMTA - OPERATOR CONVENIENCE FACILITIES Design DevelopmentFebruary 11, 2013

4

NORTH

CONTEXT PHOTOS

SITE PHOTO

GEARY BLVD.

31S

T A

VE

NU

E

32N

D A

VE

NU

E

#1 CALIFORNIA TERMINALGEARY BOULEVARD AND 32ND AVENUE

Page 6: Civic Design Review To be submitted to the Civic Design Review … › ... › 3_sfmta_cdr_2.11.13.pdf · 2020-01-02 · building design & construction s.f. department of public works

BUILDING DESIGN & CONSTRUCTIONS.F. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSARCHITECTURE

SFMTA - OPERATOR CONVENIENCE FACILITIES Design DevelopmentFebruary 11, 2013 5

BUS LANE PARKING

LINE OF EXISTING CURB

PROPERTY LINE

RETAINING WALL

EXISTING TREEWELLS

RECLOATE (E) BUS SHELTER EAST ON GEARY

GEARY BOULEVARD

GEORGE WASHINGTON HIGH SCHOOL

32ND AVENUE

EXISTING SIDEWALK MAINTAINED

#1 CALIFORNIA TERMINALSITE PLAN

SITE PLAN - N.T.S.

Page 7: Civic Design Review To be submitted to the Civic Design Review … › ... › 3_sfmta_cdr_2.11.13.pdf · 2020-01-02 · building design & construction s.f. department of public works

BUILDING DESIGN & CONSTRUCTIONS.F. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSARCHITECTURE

SFMTA - OPERATOR CONVENIENCE FACILITIES Design DevelopmentFebruary 11, 2013

6#1 CALIFORNIA TERMINAL

PLANTING PLAN

SYMBOL LATIN NAME

LEUCADENDRON DISCOLOR

LEUCADENDRON DISCOLOR

WILSONS 5’ WIDE X 5’ TALL

3’ WIDE X 5’ TALL

3’ WIDE X 3’ TALL

3’ WIDE X 2’ TALL

5 GALLON

5 GALLON

5 GALLON

1 GALLON

2

3

4

8

ANIGOZANTHOS SPP. KANGAROO PAW

KANGAROO PAW

FLAX

FLAX

YELLOW GEM

BRONZE BABYPHORMIUM TENEX

EUPHORBIA X MARTINI

EUPHORBIA X MARTINI

COMMON NAME VARIETY/COLOR HEIGHT/SPREAD SIZE QUANTITY

Page 8: Civic Design Review To be submitted to the Civic Design Review … › ... › 3_sfmta_cdr_2.11.13.pdf · 2020-01-02 · building design & construction s.f. department of public works

BUILDING DESIGN & CONSTRUCTIONS.F. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSARCHITECTURE

SFMTA - OPERATOR CONVENIENCE FACILITIES Design DevelopmentFebruary 11, 2013 7#1 CALIFORNIA TERMINAL