Upload
trinhhuong
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Civil Nuclear
Showcase 2016
Welcome
Keith Parker
CEO, Nuclear Industry Association (NIA)
Keynote
Professor John Loughhead OBE FREng FTSE
Chief Science Advisor, DECC
Programme and themes of the day
Dr Andrew Munro
Engineering Operations Director, Rolls-Royce
Advanced methods for high level nuclear waste disposition Stephen N P Smith
CEO, Algometrics Ltd
Algometrics Limited The Future of Nuclear Energy NOW
Stephen N P Smith
UKTI Civil Nuclear Showcase 2016
Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 6 29 January 2016 Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 6 Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 6
Introduction “We Invested in Nuclear”
• Who are we? – High energy physics and nuclear engineering – Independent R&D laboratory based in Cambridge, UK – Entirely privately (family) financed – No external or govt. grant funding – Specialised in advanced nuclear engineering – We work quietly!
• What do we do? • Why have we done it? • What is our primary goal? • Are we political?
Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 7 Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 7
“Parents wonder why the streams are bitter, when they themselves have poisoned the fountain.” - John Locke
The laws of physics are universal it’s just that they
reveal themselves more easily in Cambridge!
Every single major current and future problem that the world is facing today
has energy at its root cause… Discuss
Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 8
HLWD Conventional Solutions
• Partitioning of spent fuel components (re-processing) • Sellafield undertakes this activity in the UK but post 1994
cancellation of PFR left the UK with no Pu burning reactors • Re-use in conventional reactors (e.g. MoX) and other advanced
mixed fuels • Encapsulation and chemo-mechanical stabilisation (vitrification) • Final geological disposal of non-reusable component • None of the above actually fully disposes of HLW • =>Transmutation does
“There are lots of these ideas around but nothing ever comes of
them.” - NuGen
Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 9 Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 9
Possible Advanced Approaches
• Gen IV+ fast spectrum reactors
• Other Gen IV+ approaches, LFTRs, He-VHTR etc.
• ADSR and other accelerator driven proposals
• Exotic irradiation
• >>Hybrid fusion-fission reactors<<
• Ultra-intense laser irradiation
• Novel re-use of HLW materials
• Space launch disposal (how practical?)
• Combinations of all of the above
“The proof of the pudding is in the eating.” - 14th Century proverb
Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 10 Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 10
An HLW Disposition System
• Should be self-powered
• Small and compact
• Modular and of easily factory fabricated construction
• High availability
• Intrinsically safe and proliferation resistant
• Low cost with short commissioning time
• Sufficient excess power to pay-back cost
• Reduce all waste stream radio-toxicity to a human lifetime of nal reactors generating
“All these guys wants to do is burn plutonium.” - URENCO
Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 11 Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 11
Our Work
– Highly practical engineering, not only theory – Incremental – Started from physics basics and worked back up without legacy of conventional dogma or
any constraints – We do not rely on computer models or virtual representations – Reduction to practice:
• Design and fabrication of every component and material, however prosaic • Existing technology – can be done on an industrial scale right now • Every aspect from core through cooling tower has been re-thought and re-designed • Will be extensively tested in 2016
– Fully functioning prototype/ pilot plant commissioning NOW
“We haven’t the money so we’ve got to think.” - Lord Rutherford
Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 12 Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 12
Hybrid Fusion-Fission Reactor Principle “ I was taught that the way of progress was neither swift nor easy.”
- Madame Curie
Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 13
Our approach:
The physics is effectively that of an H-bomb but in a sense backwards.
Thermonuclear fast neutron pump
Electrical generation and other apparatus
Specialist irradiation
Grid
Fissile loading and fuel loop
Breeder blanket and other components
Coolant loop and working fluid
Heat sink
Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 13
Beamlines and transport
Treated waste out
Waste streams
Where we are now…
• Q3 2003-2008
– Supercomputer simulation, 3 HPC platforms
– Parallelised software development
• 2008-2013
– Materials research, equipment fabrication and test
– Parts procurement (300 suppliers) and engineering development and design
• 2013-Q3 2015
– Machine construction, test and development
• Q3 2015 – Q3 2016
– Prototype commissioning and testing, complete July 2016
• = 12 year project we are in year 12
• Adapted to optimise transmutation of each waste stream (including fission products) or as a standalone micro-reactor
“An ounce of action is worth a ton of theory”
- Friedrich Engels
Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 14 Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 14
Characteristics of What We Have Built
• It is an SMR • It is deeply sub-critical with hard fast neutron spectrum • It will have minimal fissile loading • It is intrinsically safe (turn on or off in <5mS) • It is fully scale-able • It is Na cooled operating at 530C (but this is not part of the electrical generation) • It is an electrical apparatus and has no critical mechanical moving parts • It has direct to electrical generation (no steam, no turbines) • It is compact (prototype fits in 3x42’ containers); approx. 35 tonnes excluding shielding • Prototype 3MWe, production 30MWe, possible 300MWe • Liquid fuel system with in-situ recirculation/ processing • 100% burn-up across all fissile waste streams or breeder ratio >>1 • Thermonuclear component runs at net Q~1 • There will be minimal decommissioning costs (it decommissions itself!)
• R&D and prototype is complete
“When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible he is almost
certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.” - Arthur C. Clarke
Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 15 Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 15
Our Product Offering
• We are close to the objective of our project
• We are confident we have an easily licensed, advanced and effective Generation V solution to HLWD and has the potential for use in disposal of nuclear weapons
• Complete, turnkey advanced R&D prototype kit
• Next step requires a reactor site licensed facility and testing with fissile loading
• This is where we will cease conventional (fission) nuclear work in the absence of interest from the industry and concentrate on other things
Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 16
“There’s no point buying a comb if you’ve got no hair.” - Homespun wisdom
Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 16 Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 16
Finally…
Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 17
“The most important step in getting a job done is the
recognition of the problem.” - Leo Szilard
Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 17 Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 17
The Chicago pile team, 1943
Contacts
Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 18
Stephen N P Smith CEO Tel: +44 207 266 5158 Mob: +44 7769 904 876 Email: [email protected]
Algometrics Limited St. John’s Innovation Centre Cowley Road Cambridge CB4 0WS United Kingdom
Web: www.algometrics.com (Note: We will be updating this website shortly with more reference and other relevant materials.)
Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 18 Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 18
Legal Notice
Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 19
Some of the work we undertake will be subject to the rules and regulations governing the research, development, use and manufacture of restricted and controlled items. In relation to civilian nuclear related work, Algometrics is subject to regulation by the UK Office of Nuclear Regulation. In some instances, discussions, projects and engineering output, including plans and models may be subject to UK export controls. We always seek to be compliant with the relevant rules and regulations that apply to the appropriate industries and sectors. We may also be required to verify the status of potential clients in order to be compliant with UK and US regulations on transfer of technology and the sale or export of certain restricted items. Furthermore it is not possible for us to engage in any way with brokers, consultants or other intermediaries acting for unidentified end-users or under conditions of non-disclosure.
Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 19 Copyright (C) Algometrics Limited 2015 19
How innovation is spearheading manufacturing Dr Colin Elcoate
Vice President, SPX Power and Energy
Overview
• Definitions
• SPX Flow Overview
• Nuclear Centres of Excellence
• Innovation Case Study
• Summary of Advances
• Design Innovation
• Manufacturing Innovation
• Testing Innovation
• Summary
Advanced Manufacturing
“Advanced Manufacturing is the
integration of technology based systems
and processes in the production of
products (fit, form, and function) to the
highest level of quality and in
compliance with industry specific
certification standards.”
Innovation
“Innovation is a new idea, more
effective device or process. Innovation
can be viewed as the application of
better solutions that meet new
requirements, unarticulated needs, or
existing market needs”
A leading global provider of flow control
equipment & process technologies:
• ~8,000 employees
• Operations in 35+ countries
• 38 manufacturing locations
• 25 service centres
• ~$2.5 billion in sales into 150+ countries
• 37% Food & Beverage
• 32% Industrial
• 31% Power & Energy
• ~30% sales into emerging markets
SPX Flow Overview Who we are today
January 15, 2016COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL 5
Codes and standards:
• ASME N & NPT Class 1, 2 and 3
• 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B
• NQA1
• RCC-M and RCC-MRx Class 1, 2 and 3
• HAF 604
Nuclear Centres of Excellence
Annecy, France
Glasgow, UK McKean, USA
Innovation Case Study
2010s – Nuclear Class II
Alternative Cooling Injection
Pump
1960s – Naval Boiler Feed
Pump
1970s – Nuclear Class II
Auxiliary Feed Water
Pump
The TWL is a combined pump and steam turbine on a single shaft in one casing. Self
lubricating and governing with no external services required.
‘British educated graduates achieve markedly higher salaries than those educated in their home country.’32pt
Summary of Advances
1960s
Naval
1970s
Gen II Nuclear
2010s
Nuclear Post
Fukushima
Proof of
concept
“Mass”
production
Small,
economic, low
maintenance
State of the art
five axis work
stations Dedicated
test loop
Nuclear design,
qualification and
testing driven by
market demand
BWR and PWR
applications
Self contained
and self
governing
No external
services – oil,
electricity
Rapid Start-Up
Robust with
small footprint
Turbine wheel
Electron
Discharge
Machined
Cyclone
separator to
replace filter
Dedicated
production line
Full
submergence
tests
Increased
seismic tests Full VA/VE
performed
Casting
optimisation
3D Printing
Direct Metal
Laser Sintering
(DMLS)
State of the art polishing - Micro
Machining Process (MMP)
Lead time
reduction ~40%
New post Fukushima
requirements drive
further innovation
Casting
optimisation
Invention Innovation and Advanced Manufacturing
Design innovation
Lifting boss for
easier handling
on assembly
Integral control
device to save
welded assembly
Integral flanges
instead of welded
stubs to reduce
manufacturing
time
No more welded connections exist.
Reduce lead time, reduce cost, improve quality
Manufacturing Innovation
CAD Model 3D-Printing setup Direct Metal Laser Sintered part
Finished Inducer after Micro-Machining-Process
Improve
quality,
improve
performance,
reduce lead
time and
reduce cost
Pump inducer is
critical to pump
operation
Testing Innovation
Demonstration of improved capability through physical testing
Full submergence tests performed in the
UK at SPX Flow Glasgow facility Full seismic tests performed in the
UK at the University of Bristol
Summary
British pump companies continue to
drive product improvement through
innovation and advanced
manufacturing to meet the continually
evolving and demanding
requirements of the global nuclear
industry
Providing Research & Development to Facilitate the Nuclear Industry Dr Fiona Rayment
Director Fuel Cycle Solutions, National Nuclear Laboratory
NNL at a Glance
NNL: The principal R&D organisation to underpin UK’s
national nuclear programmes
Sellafield
Preston
Risley
Stonehouse
Culham
Workington
Key Facts
Status GoGo • Commercial business model
• No direct HMG grant funding
Ownership DECC • Managed via Shareholder Executive
Revenue ~£100m • Main customers – Sellafield Ltd, EdF Energy & MoD
EBIT ~£10m • Reinvested in facilities and R&D
Headcount 900 • >60% STEM degrees/PhDs
Facilities 3 nuclear labs • Located on nuclear licenced sites
NNL Supports the UK’s Entire Civil Nuclear Fission Programme
• Continued operation of existing reactors
• Legacy waste management / decommissioning
• New nuclear build
• Geological disposal
• Plutonium stockpile disposition
• Naval propulsion support programme
• Advanced reactor (Gen IV) and fuel cycle development
• Space energy systems
• Security, non-proliferation & safeguards
UK Nuclear R&D Facilities & Critical Skills
• Replenishment of skill
base is needed to support
UK’s forward nuclear
programme
• Generation of subject
matter experts essential
in many disciplines
• Strong link between
Subject Matter Experts,
R&D and facilities
• Academic through to
industrial experience is
required
UK Funding for Nuclear R&D
UK Chancellor George Osborne recently
announced a 5-year, £250M programme of
nuclear R&D
The UK’s Nuclear Innovation & Research
Advisory Board (NIRAB) recommended
research in 5 main areas
• Making the fuels of the future
• 21st century manufacturing
• Next generation reactor design
• Advanced spent fuel recycling
• Strategic toolkit
Small Modular Reactors
Alongside R&D funding, the Chancellor announced a competition to
identify the best value small modular reactor design for the UK
Why now?
Need to plan beyond the current new build programme
Why UK?
Government R&D funding available
Opportunity to utilise UK supply chain capability
Why SMRs?
Open up potential new sites – including inland sites
Potential to deploy advanced fuels and fuel cycles
Potential advantages in overall fuel cycle economics
International Collaboration is Crucial
UK / China Joint Research & Innovation Centre recently
announced. £50M funding over 5 years
UK & US are working towards a joint treaty and have identified key
areas for R&D collaboration
UK & France – working together on future nuclear energy systems
UK companies and universities are actively engaged in many EU
nuclear R&D programmes
UK is in discussion with several potential “new nuclear” nations about
establishing appropriate regulatory frameworks and training
Emerging
Nations
COFFEE
Civil Nuclear
Showcase 2016
NDA Innovation Award Winners
Chaired by Dr Brian McConnell
Chair, NIA New Build Group & Managing Director Hydrock Group Ltd
Winner 1 - Technology Award
Ali Khan
TWI Ltd
Laser Cutting: An Innovative Approach to Decommissioning A presentation to Civil Nuclear Showcase 2016
Ali Khan – Principal Project Leader
21/01/2016
Content
• Laser Cutting – TWI
• Advantages of using lasers in nuclear
decommissioning
• Project Background – Magnox pond skip
– Disposal path
– Size reduction technology assessment
• Project Objectives
• System Design, Development &
Operation
• Summary
TWI & Laser Technology
GOLDFINGER (1964)
The first gas assisted laser cut was
made in May 1967 at TWI Ltd.
Laboratory, by A.B.J.Sullivan and
P.T.Houldcroft
Potential Benefits of Using Lasers
• Low reaction force
• Limited stand-off sensitivity
• Small & light processing head
• Smaller cut kerf – High cutting speed
– Reduced & controlled secondary
waste emission
• Laser (high value) remote from task
• reusable
• Can cut variety of complex
geometries and materials
Technology in Action
What is a Magnox Skip?
• Various designs
• Fabricated using 6mm thickness C-Mn steel of welded construction with
reinforced sections and flanges (protruding 80mm)
• Approximate size 1.4m(L) X 0.85m(W) X 1m(H)
• Weight ~ 450kg
• Coated with epoxy based paint, layer thickness up to 0.8mm
Magnox Skip inventory
Various designs storage and movement
of skips between 10 Magnox sites and
Sellafield over 3 decades
• Current Skip inventory:
• At Magnox sites ~ 500
• At Sellafield site ~2500
Size Reduction Technology Assessment
• Initially 12 size reduction technologies considered (mechanical & thermal)
• Five size reduction technologies down selected
• Fibre delivered laser chosen as the final size reduction technology
Technology For cutting of 6 -12mm
thickness
Automation
Level &
Accuracy
Cutting
speed
(m/min)
Kerf
width
(mm)
Consumables Secondary
waste kg
Reciprocating Saw – Flat
Section
Low (6mm) 1.0 ~2 4 blades/skip 1.2kg/skip
Band Saw -
Furniture Section
Low (12mm) 1.5 ~2 3 blades/skip 1.3kg/skip
Diamond Wire Medium 0.08 ~11 1 wire/3 skips 14.5kg/skip
Plasma Arc Medium 0.1 – 1.0
~2 --------------- 1.1kg/skip
Fibre Delivered Laser
Beam-5kW
High 0.3 – 1.8 ~0.8 --------------- 0.4kg/skip
Cu
rre
nt
Bas
eli
ne
Magnox Solution
5 axis CNC
milling of
about 1.2mm
over whole
surface of
each section
to reach out
of scope
criteria
~50kg of active
waste - highly
compacted
~400kg of steel
for recycling
Size
reduction to
5 sections
?????
Activity mostly
on the skip
surface
Contaminated
Magnox Skips
(450kg)
Skip Size Reduction Approach
Project Objectives
• Establish a fibre laser cutting size reduction facility at Hinkley Point ‘A’ (HPA).
– System design and development at TWI
– Inactive demonstration at TWI
– System installation and commissioning at HPA
• Size reduce three ILW contaminated skips, of various dose rates, transported
from Sellafield Ltd
• Develop a safety case for the fibre laser cutting facility.
• Demonstrate the technology capabilities to size reduce at least one skip per day
Laser Size Reduction Facility at Hinkley Point A
Active Skip Size Reduction
Skip Size Reduction System Performance
• Project completed within 2 year and under budget – Short time for introducing
new technology in to nuclear industry.
• Three skips (10.3, 25.8 & 218GBq/t) successfully size reduced.
• Robust containment of airborne and surface contamination
• Safety Case assessment – C3/R3 operating conditions
– No issues associated with VOC’s
– Consistent Cs/Sr ratio of 1.6 between skip activities
– Manageable gross Cs activities (88% collectable & easily removed)
– Significantly reduced secondary waste and collective dose uptake
• Complete operation time < 3hours/skip – potential to size reduce at least 2
skips/day
Summary of Benefits
Benefits Manual Cutting Technique
(maximum skip activity 25 GBq/t)
Remote Laser Cutting Technique
(averaged across 3 skips)
Productivity (Man hours) 64 man hour per skip 12 man hour per skip
Secondary Waste (kg) 1.3 kg per skip (4 blades + 2mm cut
kerf)
0.4 kg per skip (0.8mm cut kerf)
Collective Dose (mSv) 1500 man.mSv per skip 128 man.mSv per skip
• For large number of ILW skips collective dose even lower
• For Magnox skip inventory, estimated cost reduction by £30 million
• For Sellafield skip inventory – the cost reduction is expected to be even higher
• A plug-and-play approach – facility can be de-planted and remobilised on
another side or for other decommissioning applications
Acknowledgements and Contacts
• UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority
• UK Dept. of Energy and Climate Change
• UK Trade & Investment
• Magnox Ltd
• Sellafield Ltd
• Fanuc Robotics UK
E-mail: [email protected]
Web: www.twi-global.com
Winner 2 - SME Innovation Award Harwell RH-ILW Storage Tubes Water Recovery Solution
James Rudd
Business Development Manager – NSG Environmental Ltd
Background
Magnox (previously RSRL) were conducting Remote Handled
Intermediate Level Waste (RH-ILW) retrieval operations at Harwell
in three facilities known as the ‘tube stores’.
Harwell Remote Handled-ILW Storage Tubes Water Recovery Solution
As well as the expected canned
storage wastes they found
contaminated water within the 7m
deep legacy tube stores.
An innovative solution was
necessary for retrieval..?
Tube Store During Construction (Circa 1950)
The Ideal Solution
• The analysis of samples indicated that activity levels in the water
required it to be disposed as ILW.
• This required immobilisation to meet the Geological Disposal
Facilities Letter of Compliance (LoC) Requirements.
• A key requirement of the solution
was to;
• minimise the process steps
• consider both recovery
treatment and disposal
• utilise the existing
infrastructure RM2 During Retrievals Operation
Harwell Remote Handled-ILW Storage Tubes Water Recovery Solution
Optioneering
• Harwell conducted an options assessment.
• The result was direct absorption of the water through a bespoke
perforated bag containing water absorbing material and then
subsequent polymer encapsulation for final disposal in a 500 litre drum.
• Early trials failed, as the water did not chemically bond to the polymer.
Harwell Remote Handled-ILW Storage Tubes Water Recovery Solution
• Collaboration with specialists was seen as the way forward!
Collaboration
collaborated with:
To develop an innovative solution…
Disposability, R&D specialist & coordination
Bag specialist
Polymer specialist
Harwell Remote Handled-ILW Storage Tubes Water Recovery Solution
Collaboration
• A US based specialist polymer supplier.
• Their “N” Series of polymers provide long term stability under high
doses of radiation.
• Nochar 960 (acrylic polymer) - has the ability to absorb aqueous
waste up to 100 times its own weight!
• Nochar polymers have been used at numerous US DoE sites
including Rocky Flats, Mound, Savannah River Site, Los Alamos,
Oak Ridge, INEEL and Hanford, along with sites in other countries
including Canada, Slovenia and Australia.
Harwell Remote Handled-ILW Storage Tubes Water Recovery Solution
Innovation and Targeted Research
• Innovation - to blend Nochar and cement and lower it into the
tubes to both retrieve & encapsulate the waste!
• Extensive trials were undertaken by NSG.
o cement formulation development (PFA,
OPC, HSC, Quick Chem)
o pore size & dripping trials
o ratios of Nochar 960 to cement
o performance at pH 4 to pH 11
o Power loading ratios (75% or 90%) and
Rutpen bag type (socks, cylindrical,
conical, square pyramidal)
Harwell Remote Handled-ILW Storage Tubes Water Recovery Solution
Challenges Addressed
Challenges:
• Creating a disposable
product;
• Incorporating treatment
into retrieval of water.
The absorbent system was
developed to be:
• Lowered into the tubes to
remove the water;
• Resulted in a cured
disposable product after
absorption.
Harwell Remote Handled-ILW Storage Tubes Water Recovery Solution
Innovative Solution
The resultant product:
• Had no residual free liquids;
• Immobilised radionuclides;
• Was compatible with established RH-ILW treatment process; and
• Was subsequently endorsed by RWM.
Harwell Remote Handled-ILW Storage Tubes Water Recovery Solution
Operations
Since the technique was implemented in October 2014, over 1,500 2kg bags have
been successfully deployed and processed in line with Harwell’s existing RH-ILW
disposal LoC. The technique has enabled the project team to efficiently recover
contaminated water during ‘critical path’ waste retrieval operations
Harwell Remote Handled-ILW Storage Tubes Water Recovery Solution
Benefits
The benefits to using this approach were:
• Minimal modification to the RW2 machine;
• Water could be removed and conditioned in one step;
• Approach was accepted by RWM – LoC addendum;
• Novel process developed – other possible applications;
• Process saved Magnox over £10 million.
Harwell Remote Handled-ILW Storage Tubes Water Recovery Solution
Further Information
Further details can be found on
http://www.nsgltd.com/news/
or by getting in touch
07718 974400
Thank You
Harwell Remote Handled-ILW Storage Tubes Water Recovery Solution
Winner 3 - Highly Commended for the Innovation Award
Development of a Semi-Autonomous Robotic Spider for Remote Characterisation and Retrievals Dr Farshad Arvin, Forth Engineering
LATRO Development of a Semi-Autonomous
Robotic Spider for Remote Characterisation
and Retrievals
Objectives
• Design, build and test a robotic spider that can be used in the monitoring
and decommissioning of both dry and wet nuclear storage facilities. The
robot must cut, sort and retrieve material from the storage facilities.
• Traditional robot arms have limited reachable workspaces and ROVs have
limited cutting forces. Therefore, a large mobile robot with cutting and
grasping capabilities in to above-ground and underwater storage areas is an
appropriate solution.
Objectives
• LATRO (Latrodectus, dark colour and relatively large spider).
• LATRO Spider Robot:
• Six legs for motion, 3 DOF
• Two arms for carrying cutters, 4 DOF
• 12 V battery operated
• Hydraulic system
• Mass of body is 150 kg excluding arms
Sensors
For base station (Human intervention):
• Camera (underwater cameras) – VT 360 PT , VT 44 FZL
• Laser scanner – VT UNI FL
For Robot’s controller (Autonomous Control):
• Accelerometer
• Gyroscope
• Encoder
• Pressure sensors
Cutter/Gripper
CHE 290
• Max. Cutting force: 694 kN
• Max. Opening: 280 mm
• Length: 722 mm
• Weight: 14.5 kg
DHSS 100
• Max. Cutting force: 440 kN
• Max. Opening: 100 mm
• Length: 684 mm
• Weight: 14.5 kg
Prototype
Models
Structure static analysis - Mass 300 kg
Moment
Design of LATRO
Hardware
Mechanics Body & Legs
Hydraulics
Electronics Communication
Controllers
Sensors
Hydraulic System
Each Leg
Controller
Electronics
Hydraulic
Controller
Main
board
Mechanical Design
Prototype
Thank you for your
attention
Winner 5 - Ministers Award
Innovation in Remote Handling Solutions for Decommissioning Mark Sharpe
Oxford Technologies
Certificate Number 4728 ISO 9001
Kurion Group
Oxford Technologies is part of the Kurion Group
Stabilization Separation Access
Oxford Technologies:
• Technical Base in UK
• Complementary Technologies and Business Culture
• Access to European markets for Kurion Group capability
Remote Handling Solutions
• Plant maintenance tasks in environments hazardous to people
• Dexterous manipulation up to 4km distance in real-time
• Human in the loop, not robotics
Multi-Purpose Deployer
Markets
• Nuclear Fusion • JET
• ITER
• Nuclear Decommissioning • Dounreay
• Sellafield
• Fukushima
• High Energy Physics • MYRRHA, ESS
• CERN, Mu2e
• HiPER
• Developing Markets • Space
• Off-shore
• CBRNe
• Medical
Heritage: Nuclear Fusion - JET
• Derived and delivered the JET remote handling management system
• Delivered the JET remote handling Code of Practice
• Delivered the World’s first fully remote handling campaign inside a
Tokamak in 1998
• Prepared and delivered :-
• >10,000hrs remote operations
• > 20,000 individual RH tasks
− Plant handling, Welding, Cutting, Inspection, Cleaning, Bolting, 3D & 2D
Metrology, Packaging, Radiological surveys, Sampling, Swabbing
• Trained > 30 remote handling operators
• System for Gamma, Tritium, Beryllium environment
Heritage: Nuclear Fusion - JET
Heritage: Nuclear Fusion - JET
Heritage: Nuclear Fusion - JET
• Task Simulation
• Virtual Mock-ups
• Real-time Robot Monitoring
Virtual Environments
Heritage: Nuclear Fusion - JET
Tooling
• Inspection, Repair, Measurement
• Over 2000 individual tools
Supporting ITER
• Remote Handling
• Vacuum Group
– Direct Contract
• Machine Assembly & Installation –
Framework via Jacobs
• Plasma Diagnostics Engineering
Support
• F4E Remote Handling Support
– Direct Framework
International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor
Supporting ITER
Remote Handling of Port Plugs
Multi-Purpose Deployer Concept Study
Plasma Diagnostic Windows
Remote Handling Design
In-Vessel Viewing System Concept Design
International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor
Nuclear Decommissioning
• Prime Contractor to DSRL
• Shaft Remote Handling Platform
• Deployment System (inc. design of 10 ton lift facility)
• Development of sludge waste handling system
• Waste cutting systems (steel, concrete, cables, drums)
• Stub Tunnel clearance options
Design & Build of the Dounreay Shaft Intervention
Platform Support Systems
Nuclear Decommissioning
Design & Build of the Dounreay Shaft Intervention Platform
Nuclear Decommissioning
Design & Build of the Dounreay Shaft Intervention Platform & Support
Systems
Nuclear Decommissioning
Dounreay Shaft – Rapid full scale trials
Nuclear Decommissioning
• Recovery of wastes from legacy storage shaft & silo
• Design of all remote handling and mechanical systems
• Long term operation and maintenance in highly
• radioactive environment
Dounreay – waste retrieval and processing facility
Nuclear Decommissioning
Sellafield, FGMSP
Sellafield First Generation Magnox Storage Pond (FGMSP)
• Fuel Storage and Decanning Facility constructed during the 1950s and 1960s
• Receipt and storage of irradiated fuel
• Long term storage resulted in corrosion, poor underwater viewing
• Constructed as an open-air pond: − significant quantities of waste materials
− sludges from corrosion of fuel cladding
− fuel fragments and other debris
− skips of fuel
• Challenge: − Safe receipt and processing (through separate routes) of;
• used nuclear fuel
• sludge
• intermediate level waste (including fuel storage skips)
• pond water
Nuclear Decommissioning
Support to FGMSP
• Facility for cutting and compacting skips
• All remote work under water
• Design complete
• Removal of damaged fuel from skips
• Sort, some remedial work, consolidation
• All work underwater
• Design complete – Build started
Sellafield Sort, Segregate, Consolidate
and Condition Facility
Sellafield Magnox Skip Size Reduction Facility
Nuclear Decommissioning
Nuclear Decommissioning
Support to Fukushima
• Environmental 3D modelling
• Investigation work
• Access Devices for sampling
• Removal Devices
Fuel Debris Removal Project
Early phases
collaborating with
MHI
Assembly, Integration and Test Facilities
• 1000 m2 Assembly, Integration &
Test Facility
• Large scale prototypes and mock-
ups Robotic/Manipulator Devices
• ABB Robot
• Gantry Mounted Kuka Robot
• DexterTM
• Remote Handling Control Room
• Test Pit/Pond 10m x 5m x 4.5m deep
• Mechanical Workshop
• Electrical/Electronics Workshop
Dexter™ Advanced Servo-Manipulator Master-Slave System
“A trained Dexter Operator
can do any task remotely
that the same operator can
do hands-on”
Remote Handling Solutions… Any Questions?
www.oxfordtechnologies.co.uk
Contact:
Business Development
Tel : +44 (0)7777 647780
PANEL DISCUSSION
Chaired by Dr Brian McConnell
Summary, close and farewells
Terry Gilbert
Nuclear Consultant, Fluor Ltd and
Chair, Civil Nuclear Showcase Organising Committee
Goodbye and Farewell
• Sbohem a vše nejlepší
• Do widzenia i najlepsze życzenia
• Au revoir et meilleurs vœux
• La revedere și cele mai bune
urări
• Zbogom i najbolje želje
• 再见和良好的祝愿
• Güle güle ve iyi dilek
• Selamat tinggal dan selamat
maju jaya
• Hyvästi ja onnea
• Adiós y los mejores deseos
• さようならと最高の願い
• Tạm biệt và lời chúc tốt nhất
• وداعا وأطيب التمنيات
Civil Nuclear
Showcase 2016