Upload
samantha-craig
View
219
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CIVIL/MILITARY
WORKSHOP FABCE
ASM/ATFCM process
Validation Plan
Stjepan Varga
Brussels, 20.09.2012
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
• Step approach• Distinction of ASM/ATFCM process and organisational enablers• GO/NO GO to move next step• Starting from national ASM/ATFCM integration process• Regional ASM/ATFCM process final goal• Organisational solution to be evaluated in due time• Timeframe to consider 2012-2015 for realistic implementation• Changes subject to validation before GO/NO GO decision.
3
ATFCM/ASM Functional Models• Model A - Optimizing the current situation
• Role: Existing roles continue with additional FABCE Network management
• Model B - Optimizing the current situation, applying LEAD AMC
• Role: Existing roles continue with additional LAED AMC to support FABCE ASM management
• Model C - FABCE ATFCM coordination function, and national ASM
• Role: A FABCE Network ATFCM Centre
• Model D - FABCE ASM coordination function, and national ATFCM
• Role: FABCE Network ASM Centre
• Model E - FABCE ATFCM/ASM coordination function
• Role: FABCE Network Operations Centre
4
High Level Objectives
• Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures at national level;
• Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures at FAB level using national Structures
• Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures at FAB level using Lead AMC Concept
• Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures between national structure/Lead AMCs and NM
• Assess usability of different ASM planning and coordination tools, which could be applied in FAB CE operational environment;
HU
SK
BiH
HRSL
AT
CZ
CZ YES – FL or AreasAT YES – FL or AreasSK YES – FL or AreasHU YES – FL or AreasSL YES – FL or AreasHR YES – FL or AreasBiH NO
Geographical ScopeGeographical Scope
Procedures - Scope• D-7/D-2
• D-1 AUP
FABCE – Potential Traffic on Night Segments if available H24
Traffic sample for Friday 14/10/2011
Numbers show flights on segment for the period 0500-2300
NM
AAAAAAAA
AAAAAA
FPFPFPAMC
AMCAMCAMC
FMPFMPFMPFMP
FMPFMPFMP
MODEL AMODEL A
FAB AD
Live trial positive feedback
– Communication– Coordination among actors – Harmonisation of UQ 863 publication – FAB CE administrator– Rotation principle for FAB CE administrator– General Systems support feasible
Live trial issues• Procedures
– Respect timeline for uploading and publication– Respect of sequence of tasks – Confusion for weekend consolidation– Confusion for contingency procedure application (different procedures?)– Missed network coordination
• NOP Publications– Status publish for national files (FMP)– Wrong information in files– Wrong templates– Confusion for D-2/6 files– Inconsistency of information (FAB AUP vs EAUP)
• Systems– LARA connection – internet– NOP connection
12
NM
AAAAAAAA
AAAAAA
FPFPAMCAMC
AMCAMCAMC
FMPFMPFMPFMP
FMPFMPFMP
FATFCM
MODEL CMODEL C
NM
AAAAAAAA
AAAAAA
FPFPAMCAMC
AMCAMCAMC
FMPFMPFMPFMP
FMPFMPFMP
FASM
MODEL DMODEL D
AAAAAAAA
AAAAAA
FPFPAMCAMC
AMCAMCAMC
FMPFMPFMPFMP
FMPFMPFMP
NM
MODEL EMODEL E
FATFCMFASM
High Level Objectives
• Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures at FAB level using FAB ATFCM coordinator
• Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures at FAB level using FAB ASM coordinator
• Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures at FAB level using FAB ASM/ATFCM coordinator
• Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures between FAB ASM/ATFCM coordinator and NM
Operational scenario• CDRs cross borders• CDR synchronisation• CBAs• ATFM scenarios
– Alignment sector configurations/opening schemes– Alignment ATFM measures
• Level capping• Re-routings
RTS Technical LayoutRTS Technical Layout
Predict, NOP
LARA, CIAM NOP
Predict, SIMEX, NOP
LARA, CIAM NOP
Predict, NOP
LARA, CIAM NOP
Predict, NOP
LARA, CIAM NOP
Predict, NOP
LARA, CIAM NOP
Predict, NOP
LARA, CIAM NOP
Predict, NOP
LARA, CIAM NOP
Predict, NOP
LARA, CIAM NOP
Predict, SIMEX, NOP
LARA, CIAM NOP