21
Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems in Latvia Gunta Spriņģe, Institute of Biology, University of Latvia

Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems in Latvia

  • Upload
    jovan

  • View
    46

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems in Latvia. Gunta Spriņģe, Institute of Biology, University of Latvia. BIOLOGICAL CHANGES. Climate change impact to freshwaters physical features :. - increase in water temperature ; - decrease in number of ice days; - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems in

Latvia

Gunta Spriņģe,

Institute of Biology, University of Latvia

Page 2: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

BIOLOGICAL CHANGES

CLIMATE CHANGE

PHYSICAL CHANGES OF WATERS

CHEMICAL CHANGES OF WATERS

Page 3: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

Climate change impact to freshwaters physical features:

- increase in water temperature;

- decrease in number of ice days;

- changes in river water discharge;

- increase of extreme phenomena

etc.

Page 4: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

Character of annual mean air temperature (1928 – 2003) at meteorological stations near to long-term ecological research sites (River Salaca, Lake Engure)

0,0

1,0

2,0

3,0

4,0

5,0

6,0

7,0

8,0

9,0

1928

1933

1938

1943

1948

1953

1958

1963

1968

1973

1978

1983

1988

1993

1998

2003

vid.

tem

p.,o

C

Ainaži

Rūjiena

Mērsrags

-2,0 -1,0 0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0

Ziema

Pavasaris

Vasara

Rudens

Gada

Rūjiena

Mērsrags

Ainaži

Mann-Kendall test statistics for seasonal temperatures for time period 1928 - 2003

Page 5: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

Number ox extremely wet days (Riga-University meteorological station)

0

1

2

3

4

5

1851

1856

1861

1866

1871

1876

1881

1886

1891

1896

1901

1906

1911

1916

1921

1926

1931

1936

1941

1946

1951

1956

1961

1966

1971

1976

1981

1986

1991

1996

2001

2006

year

day

s

Page 6: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

• Chemical changes:

- decreased oxygen content (epecially – in summer low water period);

- incresed conductivity;

- increased water colour

etc.

Page 7: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

Changes of dissolved oxygen and water temperature (annual mean

1980 – 2008) of the River Salaca

10,0

10,5

11,0

11,5

12,0

12,5

13,0

13,5

14,0

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008

Oxy

gen,

mg/

l

6

7

8

9

10

11

Tem

pera

ture

, ToC

O2 ToC Linear (O2) Linear (ToC)

-3,00 -2,00 -1,00 0,00 1,00 2,00 3,00

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

June

July

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Annual

Normalised test statistic O2 Normalised test statistic To

Long term trends of dissolved oxygen and temperature to Mann-Kendall normalized test statistic (1980-2008)

Page 8: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

Long-term (1996-2005) changes of water chemical composition after Mann-Kendall test (N- number of observations; coloured p<0.05; italic – p<0.1)

Monitoring station Color

COD* (TOC) pH N-NO3

- P-PO43- HCO3

- SO42- Mg2+ Na+

Salaca2.90

N = 1092.56

N = 81-1.94

N = 109-0.83

N = 109-0.51

N = 107-0.54

N = 83-2.61

N = 83-1.36

N = 83-0.38

N = 85

Gauja 1.97

N = 111-0.06

N = 82-1.09

N = 111-1.20

N = 111-0.30

N = 111-0.39

N = 92-3.02

N = 92-2.19

N = 920.67

N = 92

Daugava2.41

N = 740.87

N = 50-0.58

N = 740.11

N = 740.26

N = 742.06

N = 63-1.99

N = 630.54

N = 631.50

N = 63

Aiviekste2.42

N = 711.88

N = 47-0.80

N = 710.55

N = 71-1.63

N = 711.14

N = 45-1.42

N = 45-1.09

N = 45-1.28

N = 45

Dubna1.53

N = 712.28

N = 47-1.94

N = 71-1.29

N = 71-0.23

N = 711.27

N = 45-1.72

N = 45-1.71

N = 45-0.90

N = 45

Lielā Jugla2.69

N = 941.28

N = 94-2.36

N = 94-1.33

N = 94-1.34

N = 940.07

N = 94-2.76

N = 94-2.00

N = 94-1.50

N = 94

Lielupe2.65

N = 1111.51

N = 81-0.73

N = 111-0.39

N = 110-1.48

N = 111-0.13

N = 87-1.83

N = 86-2.20

N = 87-1.59

N = 87

Iecava1.61

N = 772.19

N = 49-1.51

N = 77-0.04

N = 771.17

N = 76-1.24

N = 26-1.61

N = 18-1.64

N = 26-0.47

N = 26

Venta2.29

N = 851.51

N = 56 -1.42

N = 84-2.01

N = 85-1.26

N = 851.41

N = 78-2.98

N = 78-0.37

N = 781.14

N = 78

Irbe2.56

N = 931.93

N = 64-1.74

N = 92-2.07

N = 93-0.46

N = 931.26

N = 84-3.12

N = 840.03

N = 840.40

N = 84

Tebra -0.12

N = 721.34

N = 45-2.44

N = 67-0.93

N = 70-1.64

N = 72-1.73

N = 180.26

N = 18-1.85

N = 18-0.52

N = 18

Page 9: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

Changes of total and cyanobacterial biomasses, particulate organic carbon (POC) and total organic carbon (TOC) at the sampling site Vecate (River Salaca outflow) in 2008

Vecate

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

21.-

22.0

1.20

08

20.-

21.0

2.20

08

18.-

19.0

3.20

08

22.-

23.0

4.20

08

22.-

23.0

5.20

08

16.-

17.0

6.20

08

23.-

26.0

7.20

08

19.-

20.0

8.20

08

23.-

24.0

9.20

08

21.-

22.1

0.20

08

25-

26.1

1.20

08

17-

18.1

2.20

08

tota

l an

d c

yan

ob

acte

rial

bio

mas

s,

mg

/l;

PO

C,

mg

/l

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

TO

C,

mg

/l

Total Cyanobacteria POC TOC

Vecate

0.000

2.000

4.000

6.000

8.000

10.000

12.000

16

.-1

7.0

1.2

00

7

21

.02

.20

07

21

.-2

2.0

3.2

00

7

23

.-2

4.0

4.2

00

7

21

.-2

2.0

5.2

00

7

19

.-2

0.0

6.2

00

7

30

.-3

1.0

7.2

00

7

21

.-2

2.0

8.2

00

7

19

.-2

0.0

9.2

00

7

24

.-2

5.1

0.2

00

7

21

.-2

2.1

1.2

00

7

18

.-1

9.1

2.2

00

7

21

.-2

2.0

1.2

00

8

20

.-2

1.0

2.2

00

8

18

.-1

9.0

3.2

00

8

22

.-2

3.0

4.2

00

8

22

.-2

3.0

5.2

00

8

16

.-1

7.0

6.2

00

8

23

.-2

6.0

7.2

00

8

19

.-2

0.0

8.2

00

8

23

.-2

4.0

9.2

00

8

21

.-2

2.1

0.2

00

8

25

-26

.11

.20

08

17

-18

.12

.20

08

tota

l b

iom

ass,

mg

/l;

Nto

t, m

g/l

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

PO

43-,

mg

/l

Total N tot PO43-

Changes of total algal biomass and nutrient Ntot and P-PO4

3- concentrations at sampling site Vecate (River Salaca outflow) in 2007-2008

Page 10: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

Synchronous fluorescence spectra of water sample from River Salaca at sampling station Vecsalaca

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600

Viļņu garums, nm

Fluo

resc

ence

s in

tens

itāt

e

marts, 08

aprīlis, 08

maijs, 08

jūnijs, 08

jūlijs, 08

augusts, 08

septembris, 08

oktobris, 08

novembris, 08

decembris, 08

janvāris, 09

februāris, 09

marts, 09

Page 11: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

Structural and functional changes of water biota

• Changes of algae species composition;

• Changes of development aquatic vegetation;

• Changes of fish species structure

etc.

Att. no: www.mfe.govt.nz

Page 12: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

Changes of ratio of blue-greens in total phytoplankton biomass in River Salaca (1982 – 2008)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

mg

l-1

station 1

station 2

station 3

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

%station 1

station 2

station 3

Changes of phytoplankton total biomass (mg/l) in River Salaca (1982 – 2008)

Page 13: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

Overgrowth (%) changes of aquatic vegetation in River Salaca

Changes of species composition in River Salaca stretch “Inflow of Pužupes – Red cliffs”

Page 14: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

- Changes of salmon smolts migration period:migration ends ~ 1 weak earlier than 20 years

- Changes of maximum migration of salmon smolts

Maximum of the migration y = -0.0544x + 242.29

R2 = 0.0088

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Page 15: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

Increase of ratio of 1-year salmon smolts in migration process

1gadīgo smoltu īpatsvars Salacā (%)

0

20

40

60

80

100

1964 1974 1984 1994 2004

gads

smol

tu īp

atsv

ars

(%)

1

Linear (1)

Page 16: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

Distribution of bitterling Rhodeus sericeus in Latvia in 1925 (A) and now (B)

A

B

Biogeographical changes

Page 17: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

Distribution of pike-pearch

Stizostedion lucioperca in Latvia in 50-ies of 20th (A) and now (B)

A

B

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

Catch of pike-pearch Stizostedion lucioperca (kg) in Lake Burtnieku since 1992 till 2008

Page 18: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

The range of the golden loach Sabanejewia aurata geographical distribution in Europe according to Bânârescu (1991), Lelek (1987), Witkowski (1994) and Steponenas (2003) and findspots in Latvia, 2008 - 2009

LithuaniaVenta basin, 2003.g.

Arrival of new species in Latvia

Page 19: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

Investigations of benthic drift

Page 20: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

Ordination analysis of Ephemeroptera species composition in drift samples in Strīķupe below “sand-macrophyte” and “sand-detritus” microbiotops in June, August and October of 2007.

Axis 1 explains 11,5%, Axis 2 9,4% of total data dispersion.

Page 21: Climate Change Impact on Freshwater Ecosystems  in Latvia

Long term data sets coupled with mechanistic experiments provide good way of predicting future climate change effects on aquatic ecosystems (D. Conley)

1. all team of WP 3! 2. all for attention!

Thanks: