25
FRO M CLUSTERS TO INNO VATIO N SYSTEM S IN TH E W INE SECTO R LYNN K.M YTELKA CARLETO N U N IVER SITY UNU/INTECH ISR N C O NFERENCE RENAISSANCE HO TEL,TO R O N TO , 5-6 M A Y 2005

Clone development

  • Upload
    masato

  • View
    47

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

KNOWLEDGE BASES & INNOVATION. Clone development. Climate controls/ monitoring. Vineyard software management. Rootstock development. VITICULTURE. Virus diagnostics. Integrated pest management. Canopy management. Harvesting methods. Irrigation and drainage. Unique cepages & blends. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

  • FROM CLUSTERS TO INNOVATION SYSTEMS IN THE WINE SECTOR

    lynn k. mytelka

    Carleton University

    unu/intech

    ISRN Conference

    Renaissance Hotel, Toronto,

    5-6 May 2005

  • TRANSFORMING WINE CLUSTERS INTO

    INNOVATION SYSTEMS

    SINCE GRAPES WERE TURNED INTO WINE IN ANCIENT SHIRAZ (iRAN) GRAPE GROWERS TRADITIONALLY CLUSTERED IN LOCATIONS NOTED FOR THEIR NATURAL COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES IN SOILS AND CLIMATE

    tERROIR, HOWEVER, IS NO LONGER THE SOLE BASIS FOR SUSTAINED COMPETITIVENESS

    KNOWLEDGE GENERATION AND ITS APPLICATION ARE THE FOUNDATIONS FOR INNOVATIVE CHANGES THAT SUSTAIN COMPETITIVENESS

  • Clone developmentRootstock developmentVirus diagnosticsCanopy managementIrrigation and drainageClimate controls/monitoringVineyard software managementIntegrated pest managementHarvesting methodsVITICULTUREKNOWLEDGE BASES & INNOVATION

  • Unique cepages & blendsSoft equipmentYeastsTemperature controlsHygieneMacerationBarrel ageingQuality testingVINICULTURE

  • Appellation and quality standardsTourism and hospitalityWine competitionsWine educationExportsMergers and acquisitionsVertical integrationPremium contracts for grape growersBrand developmentOnline retailingORGANIZATIONAL & MARKETING

  • Grafico2

    2080022559100198

    919718229175273

    628319040202402

    111211025172731

    919145339163306

    71/80

    81/90

    91/99

    Wine exports from New World producers (tons)

    Foglio1

    71/8081/9091/99

    Argentina20,80022,559100,198

    Chile9,19718,229175,273

    Australia6,28319,040202,402

    South Africa11,12110,25172,731

    USA9,19145,339163,306

    Foglio1

    00

    00

    00

    Argentina

    Chile

    Differential increase of Argentine and Chilean wine exports (tons)

    Foglio2

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    71/80

    81/90

    91/99

    Wine exports from New World producers (tons)

    Foglio3

  • The SA wine sector in the apartheid eraKWV controlled prices and surpluses through quota systemProduction focussed on maximising yieldsStandardised production methodsKWV sole exporter, marketer, distributorExploitative labour practicesStagnant domestic market

  • Learning to Change: 1994 - 1999Quota system abolished end 80sSanctions liftedCompetency gaps in marketing revealedKWV converts to a company leaving a voidDramatic increase in exportsLimited industry coordination and strategic planning

  • The Emergence of a Strategy: 1999 2003Focus on quality and terroirNew regions and new players establishedPlanting change in line with world trendsCo-ops converting to companiesWinetech launches Vision 2020Wosa focused on building Brand South Africa

  • InnovationProduction terroir focussedLabour intensive viticultureStrong soil science knowledgeWinemakers combine modern technology with tacit knowledgeSignificant investment in cellar upgradesCreate unique South African cultivars: Pinotage across between Pinot Noire and CinsautBrand South AfricaInternational distributionFunding for research and developmentIncreasing skills of labourers and managers

  • The Chilean ModelForeign Direct Investment Flows1975 - 2001: 118.1 million1990 - 2001: 94.5 million (origin: US, Canada, France, Spain)

    Knowledge FlowsForeign Oenologist, French, at the beginningFlying WinemakersHighly skilled national Oenologists

  • Contradictory performance of the Chilean innovation system Strengths

    1. Rising degree of knowledge intensity primarily embodied in capital goods, and partially stimulated by the massive flow of foreign investment. 2. Remarkable capacity of technological absorption and adaptation, based on the presence of dynamic leading firms, skilled human resources, and initial constructive public-private sector interaction.

  • 3. Dynamic and increasingly articulated industrial structure

    4. Quality Regulatory Body (SAG)

    5. Expansion of export markets and increased export price per unit

    6. Increase of fine grape plantations

    7. Innovation in wine cepages & viniculture: carmeniere

  • Current weaknesses

    1. Low degree of cooperation and interaction among wine producers

    2. Lack of institutional support (e.g. Prochile) and of coordination among the different instutional actors (e.g. SAG, associations, universities, etc.)

    3. Low Investment in Marketing & Promotion

    4. Good quality but low price niche market

    5. No endogenous research or technological Development

  • CLUSTERS

    GEOGRAPHICAL AREAS IN WHICH

    FIRMS AND RELATED SERVICES

    ARE CO-LOCATED

    Clusters based on traditional industries

    Natural resource based industries:

    Fish farming (Norway, Chile)

    Horticulture (Netherlands, Colombia)

    Wine (Canada, Australia, Chile, South Africa)

    Consumer-oriented industries:

    Textiles & Clothing (Italy, Hong Kong)

    Ceramics (Italy, Spain, Brazil)

    Eyeglass Frames (Italy)

    Furniture (Denmark)

    EMBED Word.Picture.8

    _1125146869.doc

    FOOD INDUSTRIES

    Advanced

    materials

    for ponds &

    enclosures

    Complex

    design

    knowledge

    Monitoring

    through computer

    imaging & pattern

    recognition

    techniques

    Pharmaceutical,

    nutritional inputs

    for health &

    feeding systems

    Biotechnology

    for

    environmental

    sustainability

    Bacteriology,

    microbiology, new

    freezing technologies,

    for storage &

    packaging

    FISH FARMING

  • POTENTIALADVANTAGES OF CLUSTERINGOPPORTUNITIES FOR LINKAGES

    COLLECTIVE EFFICIENCIES

    POSITIVE EXTERNALITIES

    EVEN WHEN THESE POTENTIALS ARE REALIZED THE CLUSTER MAY NOT BECOME A DYNAMIC INNOVATION SYSTEM

  • INNOVATION SYSTEMS

    SETS OF FIRMS AND OTHER ECONOMIC AGENTS, WHO,

    TOGETHER WITH THE INSTITUTIONS (habits, practices, norms) AND POLICIES THAT INFLUENCE THEIR INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR & PERFORMANCE,

    BRING NEW PROCESSES, PRODUCTS AND ORGANIZATIONAL FORMS INTO ECONOMIC USE

    Clusters based on traditional industries

    Natural resource based industries:

    Fish farming (Norway, Chile)

    Horticulture (Netherlands, Colombia)

    Wine (Canada, Australia, Chile, South Africa)

    Consumer-oriented industries:

    Textiles & Clothing (Italy, Hong Kong)

    Ceramics (Italy, Spain, Brazil)

    Eyeglass Frames (Italy)

    Furniture (Denmark)

    EMBED Word.Picture.8

    _1125146869.doc

    FOOD INDUSTRIES

    Advanced

    materials

    for ponds &

    enclosures

    Complex

    design

    knowledge

    Monitoring

    through computer

    imaging & pattern

    recognition

    techniques

    Pharmaceutical,

    nutritional inputs

    for health &

    feeding systems

    Biotechnology

    for

    environmental

    sustainability

    Bacteriology,

    microbiology, new

    freezing technologies,

    for storage &

    packaging

    FISH FARMING

  • innovatiON SYSTEMS

    have the capacity to transform

    themselves overtime as COmpetitive

    conditions change

    of critical importance IN THIS PROCESS ARE THE

    knowledge FLOWS

    LINKAGES

    LEARNING

    AND POLICIES

    THAT STIMULATE A PROCESS OF INNOVATION

    Clusters based on traditional industries

    Natural resource based industries:

    Fish farming (Norway, Chile)

    Horticulture (Netherlands, Colombia)

    Wine (Canada, Chile, South Africa)

    Consumer-oriented industries:

    Textiles & Clothing (Italy, Hong Kong)

    Ceramics (Italy, Spain, Brazil)

    Eyeglass Frames (Italy)

    Furniture (Denmark)

    EMBED Word.Picture.8

    _1125146869.doc

    FOOD INDUSTRIES

    Advanced

    materials

    for ponds &

    enclosures

    Complex

    design

    knowledge

    Monitoring

    through computer

    imaging & pattern

    recognition

    techniques

    Pharmaceutical,

    nutritional inputs

    for health &

    feeding systems

    Biotechnology

    for

    environmental

    sustainability

    Bacteriology,

    microbiology, new

    freezing technologies,

    for storage &

    packaging

    FISH FARMING

  • ANALYZING INNOVATION SYSTEMS

    ACTORSPOLICYLINKAGES

    KNOWLEDGELEARNING

    Building innovation systems in traditional industries

    Natural resource based industries:

    Fish farming (Norway, Chile)

    Horticulture (Netherlands, Colombia)

    Wine ( Australia, Chile, South Africa)

    Consumer-oriented industries:

    Textiles & Clothing (Italy, Hong Kong)

    Ceramics (Italy, Spain, Brazil)

    Eyeglass Frames (Italy, Brazil)

    Furniture (Denmark, Egypt, Indonesia)

    EMBED Word.Picture.8

    _1125146869.doc

    FOOD INDUSTRIES

    Advanced

    materials

    for ponds &

    enclosures

    Complex

    design

    knowledge

    Monitoring

    through computer

    imaging & pattern

    recognition

    techniques

    Pharmaceutical,

    nutritional inputs

    for health &

    feeding systems

    Biotechnology

    for

    environmental

    sustainability

    Bacteriology,

    microbiology, new

    freezing technologies,

    for storage &

    packaging

    FISH FARMING

  • TRANSFORMING CLUSTERS based on NATURAL RESOURCE BASED industries INTO

    INNOVATION SYSTEMS

    tHE nIAGARA wINE cLUSTER IN cANADA

    wINE cLUSTERS IN sOUTH aFRICA

    wINE CLUSTERS IN cHILE

  • OVERVIEW OF THE NIAGARA WINE CLUSTER

    1927-1975

    Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO)created in 1927 to regulate the production and consumption of wine in the Province of Ontario

    No new winery licenses granted until 1975

    Number of wineries fell from 61 to 6

    Ontario Grape Growers Marketing Board (OGG) established in 1947 to balance the power of many small grape growers against the small number of large wineries.

  • 1975 2002

    Building an Innovative Cluster

    New small wineries with a new vision: to produce wine from European vinifera grapes

    Trigger for Innnovation: Negotiation of the Free Trade Agreement with the United States

    New Policies risk the risks of conversion from Labrusca to vinifera grapes

    Structure of the Cluster Thickens: Creation of Research and Training Organisations ( CCOVI, Niagara College); Professional Associations (WCO)

    High Quality Canadian (Ontario) wines win gold medals in European competitions

    Innovation in new wines meritage; new organic grape growing technologies

    Surplus of Vinifera grapes appears despite the marketing board

    Small firms do not grow

    lynn k. mytelka

    unu-intech

    5-2-2004

    maastricht, the netherlands

    SIDA-SAREC PRESENTATION

  • The Paradox

    Number of wineries increases to over 80

    But small wineries do not grow

    A surplus of vinifera grapes appears despite the marketing board

    Wine output grows from 645,000 litres in 1991 to over 3.9 million litres in 2002 Value of VQA wines sales increased from $5.6 million dollars to $50 million dollars between 1991 and 2002

    But Ontario wines lose market share in the domestic marketExports do not grow

  • Factors supporting a continuous process of innovation

    in the Nigara Wine Cluster

    Boundaries of the knowledge system are reconfigured by establishing linkages to a wider set of knowledge inputs creation of CCOVI, for example

    Products and Markets are reconceptualized development of wines based on vinifera grapes, development of Vidal Ice Wine , moving upscale in table wines

    Marketing innovations and linkages to broader regional development initiatives direct mailing domestically, tourism

    Factors still to be resolved in supporting a continuous process of innovation in the Nigara Wine Cluster

    Old institutions and organizations are not yet transformed through the learning and unlearning of earlier habits and practices LCBO for example needs to work more closely with smaller wineries and with export related organizations

    Closer linkages between knowledge producers and users is needed movement here is underway in new research initiatives

    Channels for information flows and dialogue between large and smaller firms need further development (many smaller firms are not members of the Wine Council of Ontario.

  • Ideal natural conditions and timingNo phylloxera No plagues and fungi (low humidity)Sunshine and high luminosityLow labour costsRising external demand for quality winesIncreasing number of new entrants, despite the hegemony of old world producersConsumer sympathy for new world wines