ANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE FOR YEAR2009

COASTAL ANADROMOUS FISH PASSAGE ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION

PROGRESS REPORT

Prepared

September 2010

Prtpar11d b- tbe California Departtnellt of Iranspqrtation Division ofEnvironl)leatal Analy$1amp

Progreu Depm-t Jmuary to Decembul009 Purpose

This is 1Mfifth annual report p19PMed in acwrdance with Article 35 ofChapter I ofDivision 1 ofthe Streets and Hgbways Code (SB 857 Kuehl) that look dfeetJanuary 1 2006 1his Jaw directs the Caliomia Department ofTranspot1ation (Department) to prepare 1111 annual ~ort desctibirtgmiddot the status ofthe Depanments pro~on locating assessing and remediating projectrrelatedhametS to fish p~ssage SB 857 aloo directs tbe Department to report itsprcgress on developinJpt progtammatiocnvironmenai~viewp~ess to streamline the permitting process for temooiatin~ fish ~~assage barrier projects

This reportdescribes the Departments fishJmssage1Utivitics bctwe~n Januu-y I and D~ber 31 20reg On September__ 2010 Direct()t McKitn-signed the Memorandum of Url(fT$Utfi1ing A coortlinatfd Appro4Cii to Wtoring Fish PU3sage for Allailromow Salmon ids i1t Coostai Watersheds tJmmg1 Cnarion ofFWt PaJSage F onlltl making the-Depanmllnt a full signatorymemba- ofthe Fish Passage Porum

The Depuimeut isrued a policy memorandum on July 7 2006 from JayNotVeD Chief Division ofEnvironmental Analysis (DBA) 10 District Deputy Directors and othen That memJJtandwn set SB 857 related policy provided a copy ofSB 857 nod provided fish passage asses$Ilent and reporting protocols The DE A mllinteins intemal inlran~ web pages that gtCOntain cop~of various policy memoraoda and gudance tlcluding a pagefor fish passage assessment an aruwal SB 857 repolfulg page md IIpermit streamlining page~lated to deveOping a programmaticmiddot envirorunenM review prooesl TI1ese pages provide e~yaccess to policy and gui~ce

The DcpatJIellt issued a policyupdate memorandum on May 6 2010 from Richard Unl Chief Eqgineer updating progtlllll and reponing requirements plan updates and new reporting schedules The memorandum fotmall~ incorporatesthe elemenlsmiddotofthe KemptonfEng lt~gteement directs districts to update fish passageJllltiS und provides direction for the development -of district fish pa~age remediation

Chanampes in Alwasl Reportin andApproadl

TheDepar1roent ismuking ehangS to the annuat report to address the elements ofhe agreement between Assembtymemba Eng lettef attaclted) Chair offhe Assembly Transportation Cornmiuee aijd Director Kemptctn dated May 26 2009 The twelve changes are

Requested Cltage Prepare an onnual report rlrat describesJuh passage remediation work completed inmiddot the prior calendar peat Januiiry I to December 31 lnelude schedules and focaticms for programmed 1-emedtatiotiS

lmpemerttation Tables 1 and 2 below provide locations ot remedintioos and project schldules for the calendar year from January 1 2009 to December 31 2609

Requested Cha1~ge Deft~ aftshyasY48f1 barrier remediation project aS a projecttifat tires federal or State jwuii(lg and isprogram~Md throug either the State Tra~porlaiiofl lillro~omettf Pragry11 (STP) tJr thNIIIJTr the Sia(l Trtgliwqy (lp~rati01 (fcPlvtect(tJIJ Prog~wn S[IOPP) Include new ccnstnuziots~ rehabilitations repajrs retrOfits alterqtio1JS ornlainlenaiICe prQjetIJ

lmplementaliOn The Department diected that districts use the new proJect definition in project development

Progreu Depm-t Jmuary to Decembul009 Purpose

This is 1Mfifth annual report p19PMed in acwrdance with Article 35 ofChapter I ofDivision 1 ofthe Streets and Hgbways Code (SB 857 Kuehl) that look dfeetJanuary 1 2006 1his Jaw directs the Caliomia Department ofTranspot1ation (Department) to prepare 1111 annual ~ort desctibirtgmiddot the status ofthe Depanments pro~on locating assessing and remediating projectrrelatedhametS to fish p~ssage SB 857 aloo directs tbe Department to report itsprcgress on developinJpt progtammatiocnvironmenai~viewp~ess to streamline the permitting process for temooiatin~ fish ~~assage barrier projects

This reportdescribes the Departments fishJmssage1Utivitics bctwe~n Januu-y I and D~ber 31 20reg On September__ 2010 Direct()t McKitn-signed the Memorandum of Url(fT$Utfi1ing A coortlinatfd Appro4Cii to Wtoring Fish PU3sage for Allailromow Salmon ids i1t Coostai Watersheds tJmmg1 Cnarion ofFWt PaJSage F onlltl making the-Depanmllnt a full signatorymemba- ofthe Fish Passage Porum

The Depuimeut isrued a policy memorandum on July 7 2006 from JayNotVeD Chief Division ofEnvironmental Analysis (DBA) 10 District Deputy Directors and othen That memJJtandwn set SB 857 related policy provided a copy ofSB 857 nod provided fish passage asses$Ilent and reporting protocols The DE A mllinteins intemal inlran~ web pages that gtCOntain cop~of various policy memoraoda and gudance tlcluding a pagefor fish passage assessment an aruwal SB 857 repolfulg page md IIpermit streamlining page~lated to deveOping a programmaticmiddot envirorunenM review prooesl TI1ese pages provide e~yaccess to policy and gui~ce

The DcpatJIellt issued a policyupdate memorandum on May 6 2010 from Richard Unl Chief Eqgineer updating progtlllll and reponing requirements plan updates and new reporting schedules The memorandum fotmall~ incorporatesthe elemenlsmiddotofthe KemptonfEng lt~gteement directs districts to update fish passageJllltiS und provides direction for the development -of district fish pa~age remediation

Chanampes in Alwasl Reportin andApproadl

TheDepar1roent ismuking ehangS to the annuat report to address the elements ofhe agreement between Assembtymemba Eng lettef attaclted) Chair offhe Assembly Transportation Cornmiuee aijd Director Kemptctn dated May 26 2009 The twelve changes are

Requested Cltage Prepare an onnual report rlrat describesJuh passage remediation work completed inmiddot the prior calendar peat Januiiry I to December 31 lnelude schedules and focaticms for programmed 1-emedtatiotiS

lmpemerttation Tables 1 and 2 below provide locations ot remedintioos and project schldules for the calendar year from January 1 2009 to December 31 2609

Requested Cha1~ge Deft~ aftshyasY48f1 barrier remediation project aS a projecttifat tires federal or State jwuii(lg and isprogram~Md throug either the State Tra~porlaiiofl lillro~omettf Pragry11 (STP) tJr thNIIIJTr the Sia(l Trtgliwqy (lp~rati01 (fcPlvtect(tJIJ Prog~wn S[IOPP) Include new ccnstnuziots~ rehabilitations repajrs retrOfits alterqtio1JS ornlainlenaiICe prQjetIJ

lmplementaliOn The Department diected that districts use the new proJect definition in project development

Requested Change fdentiJYpartial or completefish passage bullbarriers using tlle definitions In the DFG niQrmal Fish PIIsimiddotage ew~luahonratStretJm CrossingJ

ImplementatiOn TheD~arment directed thal districts fullltlw existing policy tliAt incorporates DFG guidance into the Departments fish passl)ge assegsmentand reporting protocols

Requested Change Ptuvidefish passage asrfS3ment data toprojecl desigil tmgineers

Implementation The Department dircctlld that dilltricta follow standatd practice and policy to asslSS poterttial fisn pasSllgemiddotbatriers llld assur~thatnew designs do lot impede tlsh pasampllge middot

Requ~tedOrange7 Providefoh passage barrier assessme11ts to DFG sa thut asampes3ment9 may be included in theirta(aboJe

Implementation The Department dirme4 that assessments are 3hared with OFG fur input into the OFG Calf ish database system This clatah~ system includes the Passag~ Assessment Database (PAD) which was desi~d in association with~ Fish Passage Forum to house and share fish pllSSage ass=ern data

Reguested Change D(TIIeop remediatiQIplOM in confultr1tion with DFG

lmplemetdatiou The Department directed that districts consult with DFG following stUldard pltldlce during project development

Requested Cha11ge Dcentgn rfjmediation elementS during tkprojecttksign phrne

rmplementl)tion The Department directed that districts llli11QIilation le8i8ltlllUTS

during PJUject design

Req11ested Change CafiStruci remediation elements

Implementation The Department dincted dtat construction ofremtdiation elements that are included in fue final project design Qr-eamptandilrd project dcliveryactivities

Requested Change Provitk notice to DFG when xlrrier~ arc remediated

Implementation The Oepartment verified that notice ofptojeclcompletiltm i~ typically a requifement ofpennits and that the Department contittues to notify DFG as requir~ In permit~

lleque3ted CJumJW CnnlittUemiddotassesWig tulyerts that are nat part rgtfplannedprojecu thrrgtl4gh the use middotofgranJ fimding tp assjst long-tqngeplapning efforts

Implementation The Depamnent contin~es to seek funding furmiddotnonproject remedlations

Requested Cltange Wcufi with DFG tojoittlly identifY highPriority tra11lt1pottation relaferJ fish barrier$ ltJf July 1 2JJJ0 rwliUlnMilllymiddotJI~t~

lmplementatioo The Dcentpl$lwt identified current transportation related priorities shown in Table 4 bei(IW by July l 20I 0 ltllli c9111inues working with Df() 10 develop statewide fish passage barrier priorities

Requested Change Use ttJtJifabkfedcralfimdueceived putsuant to the American Recovery laquond RelnvesmumtJct of2009 to the extent penmucd under felleral7aw

2

Implementation The American RecovCYand RelnvetmentAct of 2009 roqllired that eligible projects be immediateiy remfymiddot to break gtound for construction Tbe Act requirements did not allowtitile for th-~sesstnnntstudeslesign work right-ofway t)OquisiJion or permitlins neecentssaey for xew fish ~sQgeprojects

Aues3ment and Remediation ofFbb Passage liartten

Project-level rernediations sinceJanuarv 2006

Rerneditrtion Summary (7 5projun) The location for Table- I projext_s are shown on Figure I

Tale l ComplriedSalmoaid Fitll Pa11agt Barrier RemodlatUms Sln~ Jbullnaacy 11006

Project llistrlct Couuty Rou~e lostMlle Ptojed Namtbull

1 1 Dcl Norte 101 404 TribuOOy to Elk-Creel

2 I lwnboldt 101 1153 Stone Lagoon

3 I Humboldt LOI 407 ClfaddCmk

1 fendodlUI ~ 814 Rattlt1oalre Ct-sectk1

s ~1Norb1 l 43lgt-458 S111ith RiverWidepm~tltLble Cr~k)

6 2 Siskiyou 96 6_$0-65 5 ONeil Creck middotrribulaty to Xlamath River

7 2 Tehama 5 169 BiderCreek

8 2 Tehama 5 281 Dibble Czeek

9 2 Shusta 299 2075 Snit Croek Sacramento Tributary

10 3 Sierrat 49 40-94 Sittra 49CulV-lt Replacement Yuba

tL 5 Sama JOJ n9 E Ca_pitan Cre~Barbat~ 12 s Sllllta

101 41 Alroyo HondoBarbara

13 5 Santa 101 4719 ~CreekBarbara

14 s Santa Cruz I 10 Valencia Greek Tnbut1ry1o Aptos Creek

15 3 S3nJa CriJt 1 and 17 174-1742 Branclrorte Creek lllld CafiIOletll Creek

lnjcctgt clgtltnpl gtltd In 00~ore lhoWq ll1 bold uwllialtd Tllll

Tbullble z Active Projects witll Fl~h Paua~e

Projlaquot ~- District COunty Ruate lMtMile lgtate 1 Project Name

Culvert Projectsmiddot

I I MendOcino 1 625 DNS Cnlvert ~ilitation

TribUIY to PuddingCreek

2 1 Mendocino I 9283 CCA 1l201 4 Dunn CreeLFish Passage

l MendOdo

Mendocino

101 JJ~-

178~ CCA

11Jfl018 Hoolm~ BvDa

36Culv~4 1 101 f-fultjph CCA

1112012

3 l Mmdoeino 10 84 DNS Rattlesnake Greek

6 l ~ocino 128 3~88 DNS Beebe Storm Dattiage

7 l Mendocino 128 and 253

00shy501

CCA 1lJI20 12

264 Culverts

1tfeoclltKi~ 101 ~ 148 ~ McBriJidlr Credt4

Huiboldt Q 985shylOM

CCA 1001ZOU

1Ud Mouutain Cnek Fbh PatSilfll

10 1 Shbullll 299 3225 CCA 7ti4tzot4

BellaDiddv Lemm reekY

H 4 Mllri11 I 227 CCA 12Jlf2014 Qiacomini middotCr~l

12 4 S~moma l 32A CCA 12t2014 F ott Ross Crecl

13 4 Sonoma I 151-IS~

CCA 1212013 Gleason Beach

14 5 Sante Batbam

l 156 CCA 41112014

SaSipuroes Creek

lS s lialdamp -Barblra

101 0 ~ 9112014 RinconCteelt

lfl 7 Los Anje1es I 503 DNS Sol31iceCred4

Active Projects Summary (32 projeCI6) Thelocation for Table 1 projects are shown on Figure 2

Three new projects were added to this table (project numbers 10 18 and 19) Three projects have projected rompletion dates (CCA dale$) lh~t nave been tXleuded one year (ptpjectnumbers 3 ~and 20 1llree Disbict7 (Vcntuta County) projects were removed from the list(San Antonio Creek Bridge Reptacen1ent Lion Creek and Sisar Creek and Santa Paula ~k1 These sites wtre originaJiy lidded ~ue topotential temporary comtruction issues that have been resolved

tmiddot

4

T1ble l Aclivelroj ednrilla iisb Pmiddotatsap cootitwtd

]rqject raquostrict ColllltV Ro11te PostMila Date lngtjeetName

Bridge ll(ljech

17 2 Tehama 99 139middot CCA Craig Creek and Sunset 142 7152013 Calllll Brid~es

18 2 Tellllmbull 36 ~ CCA MlCreelt1412013

19 ~ Ttlbull 91 1~9-143 CCA North fork Mill Creell

~ 211Til014

~ CCA TJaifl Dltm Boulevard lO 1 Tiin Z99 Fish Uhdcr LUfe Gran68l 101411011 VaJey Crult

I lmiddot CCA Niles Canyon Safety 21 4 Alameda 84

133 1011013 Improvement Pioject (S1onybrook Creeltl

2Q s Sll11ta 101 22 DNS Carpinteria Creek Barbara

23 s Sanm IQI 55 CltA Nojo~Creek Santa Yne1r

Barbara 212011

24 5 Sanla 192 l55 ceA Arreyo Parida Creek Barbara 6l2613

25 5 Santa Ciuz 1 31S5 DJijS Scott Creek

215 5 SillllaCruz 363 DNS Wadcell Creek

27 7 vemua 150 287 CCA Santa lllula Creek8lmll

Culvert 1111d BridgemiddotProjltt5

Nap CCA Dultil RoadRtal~ 28 4 121 03middot20 10J2014 Curves and Wi~

Soouldm

Sanm 50- Widening of Us ltighway

29 ll Cb rW tOt oo~ CC 1 0 I fromMregtcrty Rgtad

Snn Bettilo 49 101112013 (Sitnta Chua) to State Route

129~Sau Benito)

PartnershipPr q1etrta

30 12 Ot~~llle 5 (3 CalTroul Tmbuco Cteeic ~

3 1 l2 Orange 5ancl

0 CCA San Mateo Creek241 S112018 ~-1009- wlndicoCIIIR boll amp0111 ~reg legtL (lCfCoos(Ncci0lt1 Cu6IOCI Co dionbull DlltSmiddotmiddotOoto NltSltlieollllnlmpl Dolos =esliuttted ~ rllr1ifnalCIil1ina gtad rqulaiQOI uegoflilli New proj CIICICIIO2009 11gtmj hrbull~~aCCA dot_ trojot~bull flgtmle(y bad CCA dob butt mfoon ond cuUr hliYeno pubijf ithodUio(ONS)

Prvject-LewtlSurveys (Capital-funded VYJrk)

The Department Dl5trict 4 San Prauslscc Bily uea cq~pJe1ed six Fish passag~assessments in 2009 th8t indicated potential batTier issues

Table 2009 Caltrans Dlsttln 4 fis1J piiiUMe ISS~tnmeot Iocatioa1

Date lAD1D1 Coullfy Route Pcbt ProjectNaiM StnAIIlM Ue

lributuy to

911109 73281) Sooorna 128

Malcama Creek illd Redwood Maacama173 Crtek Bridges

CreekReplacetnent JrOiect

Russian River

fl1109 732_816 Sonoma 128

Maacama Creek and Redwood Redwood2L8 Creek Bridg~~amp

Crerk Repla~

Proj~

Maacarna Creek

lt16109 PAOID

requeeret 7fl9f0~

Napu 12) Tulucay Creek Tulucay

64-65 Bridge CreekReplaCCIWlllt

Napa River

9 1809 PAD ID

_requested 712910amp

Solano 80 AliJno Drive Alamo 248 Onramp Len~ttbeting

Creek Ulatis Crook

8a5ltl9 73378lt1 San Mateo 101

1630shy 101 Broadway Ea3ton i7o6 lnletcbange Creek

San Francisco

Bay

43009

rAD IDi~~ a

700007

NU7I1gtori uMd to ~

Alameltla

~snrob en

84

Alameda Creek

13-136 Sridge Alameda Feplacement Creek

Proiect c [lro CALFISHmiddot~ WestDati-(PAD)

San r1911CiSIo

Bay

Plauningbulllevel assessments

The Dep111tment has completed Reconnaissance Survey on more than 520Q anatiroiOOMS fishshybearing coastal road-stream crossings and completed Detailed Surveys on more than 775 of the5e crossings Current estimateamp suggest that an additional 4400 Reconnaissance Surveys and an additional 24)0 Detailed Surveys will be needed Ptiorities for planning-level fish passage assessment were identified ltlCCording to llle planning document PtioritiltlltioiFofFish Passage S11111eys on State Hlgiway System Road-Stream Cr~ssings fn Californiil_s CQPvtal Watersheds March 2007

No Grarm aworded-

The Departtnent continues to seek funding to complete Detailed Surveys where needed Detailed Surveys will detennine tile species and life stages that may be inhibited from passage and provide data tbat will be used to determine remediation prioritieJJ

The rJepartment submitted a 2009-1 0 grant propOsai to theDFG Fisheries Restoration Grant PTogram The proposal requested funding to obtain rights-of-entry and conduct detailed surveys at high-priority crossin_gs to be selected from the Dqmtment-DFG fisb passage priority list that is UJder development The proposal IM not funded TheDep~entwill submita 201 0-U grant application willl additional Information ampased on the filllll priority Jist

The Department requested State Jlannlngand ResearCh (SP~ grant funds to continue fi$lr pmage assessment gturveys The SPR progrnmh~ twogrant objectiv~ related to planning (SPampl) and research (SPR2) activities The ongltgting and hmg tenn fish passage assessment project no longer fits the goals and objectives ofthe SPR funding requirements

Annual Bardell PrioriH

Priority LiRt (21 cPrusings) T1te location for Table 4 projects ure shown ou Figure 3

Table4461tains road-stream a-ossings that the Department considm high priority fat remediation All listed CJOSsingshave equalpriority at this time however the Department and DFG oontinuc working towards a combined transportatlon-rehllcd fish passage remediation priority list The Departmcntand DFG are wonung with the Fish Passage Jlonini to develop a statewide teclmical fish passage banier priority ranking system

tabla 4 2010 C11ltmns TranbullportbulltlonmiddotRaalad Fish PMaag~Barrier Remediation PrloriUes

Ofatrict County Route Pot

SI~ Name Strem TriMitary

1 Mendocino 101 5225 s Fork Rvan Creek RvanCreek Outlet Cree~ 1 Mendocino 101 4814 Up~ Creek Upp CrMk Mill Cree~ 1 Dei Norte 197 500 Sultan Creek Sulean Creek Smith Riller

1 Humboldt 254 418 Fish Creek Ave_ of

Rfh Creek s_ Fori Eel RiverlheGJants

2 Tehamlt~ 5 2810 DibbleCmek Dibble Creek Sactamento

RiVet

2 SiskifOU 96 660shyONeil Creek 0 1Nen Creek Klamath River655 Yank Creek - CQWmiddotCreek

2 Shasta 299 3220 (1-emo~~eek Yank CrMk sacramento Bnd River

68()shy Llille GriSS Valley L~tle Gra~~ G(tiss Vlt~lley

2 Trinity 29il 682 Creek Valley Creek Creelil T rfnlty River

121- Niles Cyn Saf$ty Stonybrook4 Alameda 84

13~ lmProvement Creek AlaiT]eda Creek

(Stooybrool( Cteak 64- Tlllucay Creek

4 Napa 121 55 Bridge Tutultay Creek Napa RIVer

6 Sama

1 1561 Sal$lpuedes Creek Salsipuedes Sanll Ynez River Ba$Ua Cleek

5 Santa 101 2 20 Carpinteria Creek Carpinteria Creek Pacific OceanB3Ibara

Tbullble z Active Projects witll Fl~h Paua~e

Projlaquot ~- District COunty Ruate lMtMile lgtate 1 Project Name

Culvert Projectsmiddot

I I MendOcino 1 625 DNS Cnlvert ~ilitation

TribUIY to PuddingCreek

2 1 Mendocino I 9283 CCA 1l201 4 Dunn CreeLFish Passage

l MendOdo

Mendocino

101 JJ~-

178~ CCA

11Jfl018 Hoolm~ BvDa

36Culv~4 1 101 f-fultjph CCA

1112012

3 l Mmdoeino 10 84 DNS Rattlesnake Greek

6 l ~ocino 128 3~88 DNS Beebe Storm Dattiage

7 l Mendocino 128 and 253

00shy501

CCA 1lJI20 12

264 Culverts

1tfeoclltKi~ 101 ~ 148 ~ McBriJidlr Credt4

Huiboldt Q 985shylOM

CCA 1001ZOU

1Ud Mouutain Cnek Fbh PatSilfll

10 1 Shbullll 299 3225 CCA 7ti4tzot4

BellaDiddv Lemm reekY

H 4 Mllri11 I 227 CCA 12Jlf2014 Qiacomini middotCr~l

12 4 S~moma l 32A CCA 12t2014 F ott Ross Crecl

13 4 Sonoma I 151-IS~

CCA 1212013 Gleason Beach

14 5 Sante Batbam

l 156 CCA 41112014

SaSipuroes Creek

lS s lialdamp -Barblra

101 0 ~ 9112014 RinconCteelt

lfl 7 Los Anje1es I 503 DNS Sol31iceCred4

Active Projects Summary (32 projeCI6) Thelocation for Table 1 projects are shown on Figure 2

Three new projects were added to this table (project numbers 10 18 and 19) Three projects have projected rompletion dates (CCA dale$) lh~t nave been tXleuded one year (ptpjectnumbers 3 ~and 20 1llree Disbict7 (Vcntuta County) projects were removed from the list(San Antonio Creek Bridge Reptacen1ent Lion Creek and Sisar Creek and Santa Paula ~k1 These sites wtre originaJiy lidded ~ue topotential temporary comtruction issues that have been resolved

tmiddot

4

T1ble l Aclivelroj ednrilla iisb Pmiddotatsap cootitwtd

]rqject raquostrict ColllltV Ro11te PostMila Date lngtjeetName

Bridge ll(ljech

17 2 Tehama 99 139middot CCA Craig Creek and Sunset 142 7152013 Calllll Brid~es

18 2 Tellllmbull 36 ~ CCA MlCreelt1412013

19 ~ Ttlbull 91 1~9-143 CCA North fork Mill Creell

~ 211Til014

~ CCA TJaifl Dltm Boulevard lO 1 Tiin Z99 Fish Uhdcr LUfe Gran68l 101411011 VaJey Crult

I lmiddot CCA Niles Canyon Safety 21 4 Alameda 84

133 1011013 Improvement Pioject (S1onybrook Creeltl

2Q s Sll11ta 101 22 DNS Carpinteria Creek Barbara

23 s Sanm IQI 55 CltA Nojo~Creek Santa Yne1r

Barbara 212011

24 5 Sanla 192 l55 ceA Arreyo Parida Creek Barbara 6l2613

25 5 Santa Ciuz 1 31S5 DJijS Scott Creek

215 5 SillllaCruz 363 DNS Wadcell Creek

27 7 vemua 150 287 CCA Santa lllula Creek8lmll

Culvert 1111d BridgemiddotProjltt5

Nap CCA Dultil RoadRtal~ 28 4 121 03middot20 10J2014 Curves and Wi~

Soouldm

Sanm 50- Widening of Us ltighway

29 ll Cb rW tOt oo~ CC 1 0 I fromMregtcrty Rgtad

Snn Bettilo 49 101112013 (Sitnta Chua) to State Route

129~Sau Benito)

PartnershipPr q1etrta

30 12 Ot~~llle 5 (3 CalTroul Tmbuco Cteeic ~

3 1 l2 Orange 5ancl

0 CCA San Mateo Creek241 S112018 ~-1009- wlndicoCIIIR boll amp0111 ~reg legtL (lCfCoos(Ncci0lt1 Cu6IOCI Co dionbull DlltSmiddotmiddotOoto NltSltlieollllnlmpl Dolos =esliuttted ~ rllr1ifnalCIil1ina gtad rqulaiQOI uegoflilli New proj CIICICIIO2009 11gtmj hrbull~~aCCA dot_ trojot~bull flgtmle(y bad CCA dob butt mfoon ond cuUr hliYeno pubijf ithodUio(ONS)

Prvject-LewtlSurveys (Capital-funded VYJrk)

The Department Dl5trict 4 San Prauslscc Bily uea cq~pJe1ed six Fish passag~assessments in 2009 th8t indicated potential batTier issues

Table 2009 Caltrans Dlsttln 4 fis1J piiiUMe ISS~tnmeot Iocatioa1

Date lAD1D1 Coullfy Route Pcbt ProjectNaiM StnAIIlM Ue

lributuy to

911109 73281) Sooorna 128

Malcama Creek illd Redwood Maacama173 Crtek Bridges

CreekReplacetnent JrOiect

Russian River

fl1109 732_816 Sonoma 128

Maacama Creek and Redwood Redwood2L8 Creek Bridg~~amp

Crerk Repla~

Proj~

Maacarna Creek

lt16109 PAOID

requeeret 7fl9f0~

Napu 12) Tulucay Creek Tulucay

64-65 Bridge CreekReplaCCIWlllt

Napa River

9 1809 PAD ID

_requested 712910amp

Solano 80 AliJno Drive Alamo 248 Onramp Len~ttbeting

Creek Ulatis Crook

8a5ltl9 73378lt1 San Mateo 101

1630shy 101 Broadway Ea3ton i7o6 lnletcbange Creek

San Francisco

Bay

43009

rAD IDi~~ a

700007

NU7I1gtori uMd to ~

Alameltla

~snrob en

84

Alameda Creek

13-136 Sridge Alameda Feplacement Creek

Proiect c [lro CALFISHmiddot~ WestDati-(PAD)

San r1911CiSIo

Bay

Plauningbulllevel assessments

The Dep111tment has completed Reconnaissance Survey on more than 520Q anatiroiOOMS fishshybearing coastal road-stream crossings and completed Detailed Surveys on more than 775 of the5e crossings Current estimateamp suggest that an additional 4400 Reconnaissance Surveys and an additional 24)0 Detailed Surveys will be needed Ptiorities for planning-level fish passage assessment were identified ltlCCording to llle planning document PtioritiltlltioiFofFish Passage S11111eys on State Hlgiway System Road-Stream Cr~ssings fn Californiil_s CQPvtal Watersheds March 2007

No Grarm aworded-

The Departtnent continues to seek funding to complete Detailed Surveys where needed Detailed Surveys will detennine tile species and life stages that may be inhibited from passage and provide data tbat will be used to determine remediation prioritieJJ

The rJepartment submitted a 2009-1 0 grant propOsai to theDFG Fisheries Restoration Grant PTogram The proposal requested funding to obtain rights-of-entry and conduct detailed surveys at high-priority crossin_gs to be selected from the Dqmtment-DFG fisb passage priority list that is UJder development The proposal IM not funded TheDep~entwill submita 201 0-U grant application willl additional Information ampased on the filllll priority Jist

The Department requested State Jlannlngand ResearCh (SP~ grant funds to continue fi$lr pmage assessment gturveys The SPR progrnmh~ twogrant objectiv~ related to planning (SPampl) and research (SPR2) activities The ongltgting and hmg tenn fish passage assessment project no longer fits the goals and objectives ofthe SPR funding requirements

Annual Bardell PrioriH

Priority LiRt (21 cPrusings) T1te location for Table 4 projects ure shown ou Figure 3

Table4461tains road-stream a-ossings that the Department considm high priority fat remediation All listed CJOSsingshave equalpriority at this time however the Department and DFG oontinuc working towards a combined transportatlon-rehllcd fish passage remediation priority list The Departmcntand DFG are wonung with the Fish Passage Jlonini to develop a statewide teclmical fish passage banier priority ranking system

tabla 4 2010 C11ltmns TranbullportbulltlonmiddotRaalad Fish PMaag~Barrier Remediation PrloriUes

Ofatrict County Route Pot

SI~ Name Strem TriMitary

1 Mendocino 101 5225 s Fork Rvan Creek RvanCreek Outlet Cree~ 1 Mendocino 101 4814 Up~ Creek Upp CrMk Mill Cree~ 1 Dei Norte 197 500 Sultan Creek Sulean Creek Smith Riller

1 Humboldt 254 418 Fish Creek Ave_ of

Rfh Creek s_ Fori Eel RiverlheGJants

2 Tehamlt~ 5 2810 DibbleCmek Dibble Creek Sactamento

RiVet

2 SiskifOU 96 660shyONeil Creek 0 1Nen Creek Klamath River655 Yank Creek - CQWmiddotCreek

2 Shasta 299 3220 (1-emo~~eek Yank CrMk sacramento Bnd River

68()shy Llille GriSS Valley L~tle Gra~~ G(tiss Vlt~lley

2 Trinity 29il 682 Creek Valley Creek Creelil T rfnlty River

121- Niles Cyn Saf$ty Stonybrook4 Alameda 84

13~ lmProvement Creek AlaiT]eda Creek

(Stooybrool( Cteak 64- Tlllucay Creek

4 Napa 121 55 Bridge Tutultay Creek Napa RIVer

6 Sama

1 1561 Sal$lpuedes Creek Salsipuedes Sanll Ynez River Ba$Ua Cleek

5 Santa 101 2 20 Carpinteria Creek Carpinteria Creek Pacific OceanB3Ibara

T1ble l Aclivelroj ednrilla iisb Pmiddotatsap cootitwtd

]rqject raquostrict ColllltV Ro11te PostMila Date lngtjeetName

Bridge ll(ljech

17 2 Tehama 99 139middot CCA Craig Creek and Sunset 142 7152013 Calllll Brid~es

18 2 Tellllmbull 36 ~ CCA MlCreelt1412013

19 ~ Ttlbull 91 1~9-143 CCA North fork Mill Creell

~ 211Til014

~ CCA TJaifl Dltm Boulevard lO 1 Tiin Z99 Fish Uhdcr LUfe Gran68l 101411011 VaJey Crult

I lmiddot CCA Niles Canyon Safety 21 4 Alameda 84

133 1011013 Improvement Pioject (S1onybrook Creeltl

2Q s Sll11ta 101 22 DNS Carpinteria Creek Barbara

23 s Sanm IQI 55 CltA Nojo~Creek Santa Yne1r

Barbara 212011

24 5 Sanla 192 l55 ceA Arreyo Parida Creek Barbara 6l2613

25 5 Santa Ciuz 1 31S5 DJijS Scott Creek

215 5 SillllaCruz 363 DNS Wadcell Creek

27 7 vemua 150 287 CCA Santa lllula Creek8lmll

Culvert 1111d BridgemiddotProjltt5

Nap CCA Dultil RoadRtal~ 28 4 121 03middot20 10J2014 Curves and Wi~

Soouldm

Sanm 50- Widening of Us ltighway

29 ll Cb rW tOt oo~ CC 1 0 I fromMregtcrty Rgtad

Snn Bettilo 49 101112013 (Sitnta Chua) to State Route

129~Sau Benito)

PartnershipPr q1etrta

30 12 Ot~~llle 5 (3 CalTroul Tmbuco Cteeic ~

3 1 l2 Orange 5ancl

0 CCA San Mateo Creek241 S112018 ~-1009- wlndicoCIIIR boll amp0111 ~reg legtL (lCfCoos(Ncci0lt1 Cu6IOCI Co dionbull DlltSmiddotmiddotOoto NltSltlieollllnlmpl Dolos =esliuttted ~ rllr1ifnalCIil1ina gtad rqulaiQOI uegoflilli New proj CIICICIIO2009 11gtmj hrbull~~aCCA dot_ trojot~bull flgtmle(y bad CCA dob butt mfoon ond cuUr hliYeno pubijf ithodUio(ONS)

Prvject-LewtlSurveys (Capital-funded VYJrk)

The Department Dl5trict 4 San Prauslscc Bily uea cq~pJe1ed six Fish passag~assessments in 2009 th8t indicated potential batTier issues

Table 2009 Caltrans Dlsttln 4 fis1J piiiUMe ISS~tnmeot Iocatioa1

Date lAD1D1 Coullfy Route Pcbt ProjectNaiM StnAIIlM Ue

lributuy to

911109 73281) Sooorna 128

Malcama Creek illd Redwood Maacama173 Crtek Bridges

CreekReplacetnent JrOiect

Russian River

fl1109 732_816 Sonoma 128

Maacama Creek and Redwood Redwood2L8 Creek Bridg~~amp

Crerk Repla~

Proj~

Maacarna Creek

lt16109 PAOID

requeeret 7fl9f0~

Napu 12) Tulucay Creek Tulucay

64-65 Bridge CreekReplaCCIWlllt

Napa River

9 1809 PAD ID

_requested 712910amp

Solano 80 AliJno Drive Alamo 248 Onramp Len~ttbeting

Creek Ulatis Crook

8a5ltl9 73378lt1 San Mateo 101

1630shy 101 Broadway Ea3ton i7o6 lnletcbange Creek

San Francisco

Bay

43009

rAD IDi~~ a

700007

NU7I1gtori uMd to ~

Alameltla

~snrob en

84

Alameda Creek

13-136 Sridge Alameda Feplacement Creek

Proiect c [lro CALFISHmiddot~ WestDati-(PAD)

San r1911CiSIo

Bay

Plauningbulllevel assessments

The Dep111tment has completed Reconnaissance Survey on more than 520Q anatiroiOOMS fishshybearing coastal road-stream crossings and completed Detailed Surveys on more than 775 of the5e crossings Current estimateamp suggest that an additional 4400 Reconnaissance Surveys and an additional 24)0 Detailed Surveys will be needed Ptiorities for planning-level fish passage assessment were identified ltlCCording to llle planning document PtioritiltlltioiFofFish Passage S11111eys on State Hlgiway System Road-Stream Cr~ssings fn Californiil_s CQPvtal Watersheds March 2007

No Grarm aworded-

The Departtnent continues to seek funding to complete Detailed Surveys where needed Detailed Surveys will detennine tile species and life stages that may be inhibited from passage and provide data tbat will be used to determine remediation prioritieJJ

The rJepartment submitted a 2009-1 0 grant propOsai to theDFG Fisheries Restoration Grant PTogram The proposal requested funding to obtain rights-of-entry and conduct detailed surveys at high-priority crossin_gs to be selected from the Dqmtment-DFG fisb passage priority list that is UJder development The proposal IM not funded TheDep~entwill submita 201 0-U grant application willl additional Information ampased on the filllll priority Jist

The Department requested State Jlannlngand ResearCh (SP~ grant funds to continue fi$lr pmage assessment gturveys The SPR progrnmh~ twogrant objectiv~ related to planning (SPampl) and research (SPR2) activities The ongltgting and hmg tenn fish passage assessment project no longer fits the goals and objectives ofthe SPR funding requirements

Annual Bardell PrioriH

Priority LiRt (21 cPrusings) T1te location for Table 4 projects ure shown ou Figure 3

Table4461tains road-stream a-ossings that the Department considm high priority fat remediation All listed CJOSsingshave equalpriority at this time however the Department and DFG oontinuc working towards a combined transportatlon-rehllcd fish passage remediation priority list The Departmcntand DFG are wonung with the Fish Passage Jlonini to develop a statewide teclmical fish passage banier priority ranking system

tabla 4 2010 C11ltmns TranbullportbulltlonmiddotRaalad Fish PMaag~Barrier Remediation PrloriUes

Ofatrict County Route Pot

SI~ Name Strem TriMitary

1 Mendocino 101 5225 s Fork Rvan Creek RvanCreek Outlet Cree~ 1 Mendocino 101 4814 Up~ Creek Upp CrMk Mill Cree~ 1 Dei Norte 197 500 Sultan Creek Sulean Creek Smith Riller

1 Humboldt 254 418 Fish Creek Ave_ of

Rfh Creek s_ Fori Eel RiverlheGJants

2 Tehamlt~ 5 2810 DibbleCmek Dibble Creek Sactamento

RiVet

2 SiskifOU 96 660shyONeil Creek 0 1Nen Creek Klamath River655 Yank Creek - CQWmiddotCreek

2 Shasta 299 3220 (1-emo~~eek Yank CrMk sacramento Bnd River

68()shy Llille GriSS Valley L~tle Gra~~ G(tiss Vlt~lley

2 Trinity 29il 682 Creek Valley Creek Creelil T rfnlty River

121- Niles Cyn Saf$ty Stonybrook4 Alameda 84

13~ lmProvement Creek AlaiT]eda Creek

(Stooybrool( Cteak 64- Tlllucay Creek

4 Napa 121 55 Bridge Tutultay Creek Napa RIVer

6 Sama

1 1561 Sal$lpuedes Creek Salsipuedes Sanll Ynez River Ba$Ua Cleek

5 Santa 101 2 20 Carpinteria Creek Carpinteria Creek Pacific OceanB3Ibara

Prvject-LewtlSurveys (Capital-funded VYJrk)

The Department Dl5trict 4 San Prauslscc Bily uea cq~pJe1ed six Fish passag~assessments in 2009 th8t indicated potential batTier issues

Table 2009 Caltrans Dlsttln 4 fis1J piiiUMe ISS~tnmeot Iocatioa1

Date lAD1D1 Coullfy Route Pcbt ProjectNaiM StnAIIlM Ue

lributuy to

911109 73281) Sooorna 128

Malcama Creek illd Redwood Maacama173 Crtek Bridges

CreekReplacetnent JrOiect

Russian River

fl1109 732_816 Sonoma 128

Maacama Creek and Redwood Redwood2L8 Creek Bridg~~amp

Crerk Repla~

Proj~

Maacarna Creek

lt16109 PAOID

requeeret 7fl9f0~

Napu 12) Tulucay Creek Tulucay

64-65 Bridge CreekReplaCCIWlllt

Napa River

9 1809 PAD ID

_requested 712910amp

Solano 80 AliJno Drive Alamo 248 Onramp Len~ttbeting

Creek Ulatis Crook

8a5ltl9 73378lt1 San Mateo 101

1630shy 101 Broadway Ea3ton i7o6 lnletcbange Creek

San Francisco

Bay

43009

rAD IDi~~ a

700007

NU7I1gtori uMd to ~

Alameltla

~snrob en

84

Alameda Creek

13-136 Sridge Alameda Feplacement Creek

Proiect c [lro CALFISHmiddot~ WestDati-(PAD)

San r1911CiSIo

Bay

Plauningbulllevel assessments

The Dep111tment has completed Reconnaissance Survey on more than 520Q anatiroiOOMS fishshybearing coastal road-stream crossings and completed Detailed Surveys on more than 775 of the5e crossings Current estimateamp suggest that an additional 4400 Reconnaissance Surveys and an additional 24)0 Detailed Surveys will be needed Ptiorities for planning-level fish passage assessment were identified ltlCCording to llle planning document PtioritiltlltioiFofFish Passage S11111eys on State Hlgiway System Road-Stream Cr~ssings fn Californiil_s CQPvtal Watersheds March 2007

No Grarm aworded-

The Departtnent continues to seek funding to complete Detailed Surveys where needed Detailed Surveys will detennine tile species and life stages that may be inhibited from passage and provide data tbat will be used to determine remediation prioritieJJ

The rJepartment submitted a 2009-1 0 grant propOsai to theDFG Fisheries Restoration Grant PTogram The proposal requested funding to obtain rights-of-entry and conduct detailed surveys at high-priority crossin_gs to be selected from the Dqmtment-DFG fisb passage priority list that is UJder development The proposal IM not funded TheDep~entwill submita 201 0-U grant application willl additional Information ampased on the filllll priority Jist

The Department requested State Jlannlngand ResearCh (SP~ grant funds to continue fi$lr pmage assessment gturveys The SPR progrnmh~ twogrant objectiv~ related to planning (SPampl) and research (SPR2) activities The ongltgting and hmg tenn fish passage assessment project no longer fits the goals and objectives ofthe SPR funding requirements

Annual Bardell PrioriH

Priority LiRt (21 cPrusings) T1te location for Table 4 projects ure shown ou Figure 3

Table4461tains road-stream a-ossings that the Department considm high priority fat remediation All listed CJOSsingshave equalpriority at this time however the Department and DFG oontinuc working towards a combined transportatlon-rehllcd fish passage remediation priority list The Departmcntand DFG are wonung with the Fish Passage Jlonini to develop a statewide teclmical fish passage banier priority ranking system

tabla 4 2010 C11ltmns TranbullportbulltlonmiddotRaalad Fish PMaag~Barrier Remediation PrloriUes

Ofatrict County Route Pot

SI~ Name Strem TriMitary

1 Mendocino 101 5225 s Fork Rvan Creek RvanCreek Outlet Cree~ 1 Mendocino 101 4814 Up~ Creek Upp CrMk Mill Cree~ 1 Dei Norte 197 500 Sultan Creek Sulean Creek Smith Riller

1 Humboldt 254 418 Fish Creek Ave_ of

Rfh Creek s_ Fori Eel RiverlheGJants

2 Tehamlt~ 5 2810 DibbleCmek Dibble Creek Sactamento

RiVet

2 SiskifOU 96 660shyONeil Creek 0 1Nen Creek Klamath River655 Yank Creek - CQWmiddotCreek

2 Shasta 299 3220 (1-emo~~eek Yank CrMk sacramento Bnd River

68()shy Llille GriSS Valley L~tle Gra~~ G(tiss Vlt~lley

2 Trinity 29il 682 Creek Valley Creek Creelil T rfnlty River

121- Niles Cyn Saf$ty Stonybrook4 Alameda 84

13~ lmProvement Creek AlaiT]eda Creek

(Stooybrool( Cteak 64- Tlllucay Creek

4 Napa 121 55 Bridge Tutultay Creek Napa RIVer

6 Sama

1 1561 Sal$lpuedes Creek Salsipuedes Sanll Ynez River Ba$Ua Cleek

5 Santa 101 2 20 Carpinteria Creek Carpinteria Creek Pacific OceanB3Ibara

The rJepartment submitted a 2009-1 0 grant propOsai to theDFG Fisheries Restoration Grant PTogram The proposal requested funding to obtain rights-of-entry and conduct detailed surveys at high-priority crossin_gs to be selected from the Dqmtment-DFG fisb passage priority list that is UJder development The proposal IM not funded TheDep~entwill submita 201 0-U grant application willl additional Information ampased on the filllll priority Jist

The Department requested State Jlannlngand ResearCh (SP~ grant funds to continue fi$lr pmage assessment gturveys The SPR progrnmh~ twogrant objectiv~ related to planning (SPampl) and research (SPR2) activities The ongltgting and hmg tenn fish passage assessment project no longer fits the goals and objectives ofthe SPR funding requirements

Annual Bardell PrioriH

Priority LiRt (21 cPrusings) T1te location for Table 4 projects ure shown ou Figure 3

Table4461tains road-stream a-ossings that the Department considm high priority fat remediation All listed CJOSsingshave equalpriority at this time however the Department and DFG oontinuc working towards a combined transportatlon-rehllcd fish passage remediation priority list The Departmcntand DFG are wonung with the Fish Passage Jlonini to develop a statewide teclmical fish passage banier priority ranking system

tabla 4 2010 C11ltmns TranbullportbulltlonmiddotRaalad Fish PMaag~Barrier Remediation PrloriUes

Ofatrict County Route Pot

SI~ Name Strem TriMitary

1 Mendocino 101 5225 s Fork Rvan Creek RvanCreek Outlet Cree~ 1 Mendocino 101 4814 Up~ Creek Upp CrMk Mill Cree~ 1 Dei Norte 197 500 Sultan Creek Sulean Creek Smith Riller

1 Humboldt 254 418 Fish Creek Ave_ of

Rfh Creek s_ Fori Eel RiverlheGJants

2 Tehamlt~ 5 2810 DibbleCmek Dibble Creek Sactamento

RiVet

2 SiskifOU 96 660shyONeil Creek 0 1Nen Creek Klamath River655 Yank Creek - CQWmiddotCreek

2 Shasta 299 3220 (1-emo~~eek Yank CrMk sacramento Bnd River

68()shy Llille GriSS Valley L~tle Gra~~ G(tiss Vlt~lley

2 Trinity 29il 682 Creek Valley Creek Creelil T rfnlty River

121- Niles Cyn Saf$ty Stonybrook4 Alameda 84

13~ lmProvement Creek AlaiT]eda Creek

(Stooybrool( Cteak 64- Tlllucay Creek

4 Napa 121 55 Bridge Tutultay Creek Napa RIVer

6 Sama

1 1561 Sal$lpuedes Creek Salsipuedes Sanll Ynez River Ba$Ua Cleek

5 Santa 101 2 20 Carpinteria Creek Carpinteria Creek Pacific OceanB3Ibara

Programmade EDironmeotal Review ProeeM

Agency Amements

The 1gtli)artlncntcontinue$ wofAillg witbDFG the Nltilgtnal Oceanic and Atnwspheric Ailministration National Marirte Fisheries Service ~IPS) andmiddot(he US Fish and Wildlife Seryice (USFWS) to negot~ streamlined enVironmental review and pemlittingprocyQures to improve aamph passage remediation The agencies met to develop prof1amlnatic envitorunentnl t~tnhorizations fur activities that eat1 be c~ as routine maintenance end for small projeds hat improve or provide fish passage ROiit1le maintenance includes cUlvert repair cllvett cleaning and vegetation management Small-lmpact projects that typically include fish p~s~ge remediation efforts ioolude culvert installation weir and baffle inslilfatiotJ and small bridge construction middot

The- geographic scopemiddotoflhis proamprtammatic 1Ytementncludes coastal drainages from the Oregon bordllr to Santa Cruz County The agrccmeQt requires consultation on approxitruttely 58 planlspecies and 33 fl$h and wildWe-speeies that ll1lly beaffucted Federal agencies prepared biologicnl assessments to proviile supporting doltIIlentatioo for their proposed actions The administrative draft ofthe biological assessment for NMFS was rmewe4 Pinal modifications and an analysis of the projected ext~Qfincidental talce have been incotpof3ied into the document After reproduction is compJeto the Dioiog1CI) BSsessroents will be transroihed ro the fedll31 trustee ageociesfotreview

Tllble ltt 2010 Cilllrans TraneparttlaRalatMI Fleh Pa~~aage BatTier Remedlellan Priarlti contlnuMI

Dibull trt ColihfV Rc~lemiddot Poat MUe SltfNa- SituIn ntbutbullrv

5 Santa Safbara 101 223shy

middot230 San Pedro Creek San Pedro Creek Goteta Slough

5 Santa Barbara 192 15~ Arrqjo Parlda Arryo Paridi Paclfoc Ocean

7 Los

Angeles 5030 SoiSiice Creekmiddot Solstloe Cree4t Paciflc Ocean

7 Ventura 126 2648 Hopper Creek Hopper Creek Santa Clara River

7 VenIJra 126 2881 Piru Creek Plfl Creek Santa Clara River

7 Ventura 160 2870 Santa Paula Creek Santa Paui

Creel S-tnta Clara River

11 San0ieyl) 76 2946 SR-76 Pauma ~eek

Pauma Creek San LuisRey River

Figure 1 Completed Fish Pa5sage Barrier Remediations Since

January 1 2006

Note Numbers correspond to project numbers in Tabie 1

Figure 2 Active Fish Passage Projects

--middot----

Note Numbers corrnpond to project numbers in Table 2

10

bull 0

Figure 3 Caltrans 2010 Transportation Related Fi$h

Passage Barrier 1 Remediation Priority

Nota Numbers corre5p0nd to project numbers in Tabla 4o

I I

0

Figure 2 Active Fish Passage Projects

--middot----

Note Numbers corrnpond to project numbers in Table 2

10

bull 0

Figure 3 Caltrans 2010 Transportation Related Fi$h

Passage Barrier 1 Remediation Priority

Nota Numbers corre5p0nd to project numbers in Tabla 4o

I I

0

bull 0

Figure 3 Caltrans 2010 Transportation Related Fi$h

Passage Barrier 1 Remediation Priority

Nota Numbers corre5p0nd to project numbers in Tabla 4o

I I

0