9
Page 1 of 2 Case Number SP-17-010 ZONING MAP CHANGE STAFF REPORT City Council Meeting Date: Council District 6 August 15, 2017 Continued Yes _X_ No __ Case Manager Laura Evans Surplus Yes ___ No _X_ Council Initiated Yes ___ No _X_ Owner / Applicant: Chisolm Summer Creek, LLC Site Location: 9100 - 9400 blocks Summer Creek Drive Mapsco: 102 V, Z Proposed Use: Required site plan for PD 971 to add Multifamily Companion Cases: ZC-15-034/PD 971 Background: The property is located near the corner of McPherson Blvd. and Summer Creek Drive. The applicant is proposing a site plan for multifamily uses. The PD zoning was approved in 2015 for all uses in “D” with a maximum of 24 units per acre; site plan required. During the Zoning Commission, the applicant indicated they met with the Summer Creek Ranch, Summer Creek South, and Panther Heights neighborhood associations. The Summer Creek Ranch HOA has submitted a letter of no objection to the project. The case was continued from the August 1 hearing to allow for more time to work on site plan. Site Information: Owner: Chisolm Summer Creek, LLC 306 Main Street Fort Worth, TX 76102 Agent Dunaway Associates (Chance LeBlanc) Acreage: 10.391 acres Comprehensive Plan Sector: Far Southwest Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses: North “PD-971” PD/D with a maximum of 24 units per acre; site plan required / vacant East “CF” Community Facilities / vacant South “E” Neighborhood Commercial / vacant West “G” Intensive Commercial / vacant Site Plan Comments: The site plan as submitted is in general compliance with the zoning regulations. Compliance with the item noted above shall be reflected on the site plan. TPW: No Comments at this time Platting: Zoning Commission Recommendation: Approval by a vote of 7-0 Opposition: Candleridge HOA Support: Summer Creek Ranch HOA

(Comments made by Platting (Subdivision …apps.fortworthtexas.gov/council_packet/render_file.asp?...Creek South, and Panther Heights neighborhood associations. The reek Ranch HOASummer

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: (Comments made by Platting (Subdivision …apps.fortworthtexas.gov/council_packet/render_file.asp?...Creek South, and Panther Heights neighborhood associations. The reek Ranch HOASummer

Page 1 of 2

Case Number SP-17-010

ZONING MAP CHANGE STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting Date: Council District 6 August 15, 2017

Continued Yes _X_ No __ Case Manager Laura Evans Surplus Yes ___ No _X_ Council Initiated Yes ___ No _X_

Owner / Applicant: Chisolm Summer Creek, LLC Site Location: 9100 - 9400 blocks Summer Creek Drive Mapsco: 102 V, Z Proposed Use: Required site plan for PD 971 to add Multifamily Companion Cases: ZC-15-034/PD 971 Background: The property is located near the corner of McPherson Blvd. and Summer Creek Drive. The applicant is proposing a site plan for multifamily uses. The PD zoning was approved in 2015 for all uses in “D” with a maximum of 24 units per acre; site plan required. During the Zoning Commission, the applicant indicated they met with the Summer Creek Ranch, Summer Creek South, and Panther Heights neighborhood associations. The Summer Creek Ranch HOA has submitted a letter of no objection to the project. The case was continued from the August 1 hearing to allow for more time to work on site plan. Site Information:

Owner: Chisolm Summer Creek, LLC 306 Main Street

Fort Worth, TX 76102 Agent Dunaway Associates (Chance LeBlanc) Acreage: 10.391 acres Comprehensive Plan Sector: Far Southwest Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses:

North “PD-971” PD/D with a maximum of 24 units per acre; site plan required / vacant East “CF” Community Facilities / vacant South “E” Neighborhood Commercial / vacant West “G” Intensive Commercial / vacant

Site Plan Comments:

The site plan as submitted is in general compliance with the zoning regulations. Compliance with the item noted above shall be reflected on the site plan. TPW:

No Comments at this time Platting:

Zoning Commission Recommendation: Approval by a vote of 7-0

Opposition: Candleridge HOA Support: Summer Creek Ranch HOA

Page 2: (Comments made by Platting (Subdivision …apps.fortworthtexas.gov/council_packet/render_file.asp?...Creek South, and Panther Heights neighborhood associations. The reek Ranch HOASummer

Page 2 of 2

No Comments at this time Fire:

No Comments at this time (Comments made by Platting (Subdivision Ordinance), Transportation/Public Works, Fire, Parks and Water Department staff cannot be waived through the Zoning Commission and City Council. Approval of the zoning site plan does not constitute the acceptance of conditions.)

Recent Relevant Zoning and Platting History:

Zoning History: ZC-15-034, from “E” Neighborhood Commercial to “PD/D” Planned Development for “D” High Density Multifamily with a maximum of 24 units per acre, site plan required. Effective 7/14/15 (subject property)

Platting History: None Transportation/Access

Street/Thoroughfare Existing Proposed In Capital

Improvements Plan (CIP)

Summer Creek Neighborhood Connector Neighborhood Connector No McPherson Neighborhood Connector Neighborhood Connector No

Public Notification: 300 foot Legal Notifications were mailed on May 22, 2017. The following organizations were notified: (emailed May 16, 2017)

Organizations Notified District 6 Alliance Fort Worth League of Neighborhood Associations, INC. Summer Creek South HA* Trinity Habitat for Humanity Streams And Valleys Inc. Crowley ISD *Closest registered neighborhood organization

Attachments:

• Location Map • Area Zoning Map with 300 ft. Notification Area • Future Land Use Map

• Aerial Photograph • Site plan • Minutes from the Zoning Commission meeting

Page 3: (Comments made by Platting (Subdivision …apps.fortworthtexas.gov/council_packet/render_file.asp?...Creek South, and Panther Heights neighborhood associations. The reek Ranch HOASummer

0 420 840210 Feet

Area Zoning Map

SP-17-010

Applicant: Address:Zoning From:Zoning To:Acres:Mapsco:Sector/District:Commission Date:Contact:

Chisholm Summer Creek, LLC

102VZ10.36539548Site Plan for PD 971PD 971 for multifamily uses9100 - 9400 blocks Summer Creek Drive

817-392-80436/14/2017Far Southwest

Created: 5/15/2017 5:24:33 PM

Subject Area

300 Foot Notification

Ü

Page 4: (Comments made by Platting (Subdivision …apps.fortworthtexas.gov/council_packet/render_file.asp?...Creek South, and Panther Heights neighborhood associations. The reek Ranch HOASummer

0 2,000 4,0001,000 Feet

Area Map

SP-17-010

Created: 5/17/2017 1:35:19 PMÜ

Council Districts2 - Salvador Espino

4 - Cary M oon

5 - Gyna B ivens

6 - Jungus Jordan

7 - Dennis Shingleton

8 - Kelly Allen Gray

9 - Ann Zadeh

3 - B rian Byrd

CONSERVATION DISTRICT

Overlay DistrictsAirport Overlay District

I-35W

TU PERIPHERAL

DESIGN DISTRICT

Noise ContoursDECIBEL

65

70

75

80

85

Page 5: (Comments made by Platting (Subdivision …apps.fortworthtexas.gov/council_packet/render_file.asp?...Creek South, and Panther Heights neighborhood associations. The reek Ranch HOASummer

PLO

TTED

BY:

LeB

lanc

, Cha

nce

ON

: Th

ursd

ay, M

ay 2

5, 2

017

AT:

4:32

PM

FIL

EPAT

H:

G:\

Prod

uctio

n500

\003

100\

3122

\002

\Civ

il\D

raw

ings

\Exh

ibits

\17-

0424

PD

Site

Pla

n\PD

Site

Pla

n.dw

g

1 Lot, ±10.391 AcresPrepared on May 25, 2017

ENGINEER/SURVEYORDUNAWAY ASSOCIATES, L.P.550 BAILEY AVENUESUITE 400FORT WORTH, TX 76107817-335-1121

EMKA DEVELOPMENT, LLCSUMMER CREEK RANCH, LLC306 MAIN STREETFORT WORTH, TX 76102210-487-7878

DEVELOPER:

· BUILDINGS I, II, III & IV LAND USE IS MULTI-FAMILY.

· BUILDINGS I, II, III & IV ARE THREE STORIES.

· ALL BUILDING EXTERIOR CONSTRUCTION TO BE A MIX OF MASONRY(STUCCO AND/OR STONE AND/OR BRICK) AND CEMENTITIOS SIDING.

Director of Planning and Development

DateSignature

BUILDING SEPARATION TO CONFORM TO UNIFORM RESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.FACE TO FACE = 50 FT. MINIMUMFACE TO END = 20 FT .MINIMUMCORNER TO CORNER= 15 FT. MINIMUMANGLED CORNER TO FACE (60° TO 90° ANGLE) = 20 FT. MINIMUMCOURTYARD FACE TO FACE = 30 FT. MINIMUMEND TO END = 15 FT. MINIMUM

DOMUS STUDIO GROUPPLANO, TX 75074214-587-4049

ARCHITECT:

BUILDING TYPE BUILDING HEIGHT GROSS FLOOR AREA NO. OF BLDG. SUBTOTAL

BUILDING I 34'-4 7 8" 41,357 SF 2 82,714 SF

BUILDING II 34'-4 7 8" 41,026 SF 3 123,078 SF

BUILDING III 34'-4 7 8" 32,871 SF 4 131,484 SF

BUILDING IV 34'-4 7 8" 17,321 SF 1 17,321 SF

CLUBHOUSE 18'-1 18" 5,584 SF 1 5,584 SF

FITNESS 18'-1 18" 2,050 SF 1 2,050 SF

CAR WASH 18'-1 18" 2,116 SF 1 2116 SF

13 364,347 SF

NOTES:

1. SITE PLAN WILL COMPLY WITH SECTION 6.506, UNIFIED RESIDENTIALDESIGN STANDARDS.

2. ALL SIGNAGE AND LIGHTING WILL CONFORM TO THE LIGHTING CODE.

3. ALL SIGNAGE WILL CONFORM TO ARTICLE 4, SIGNS.

4. PROJECT WILL COMPLY WITH SECTION 6.301, LANDSCAPING.

5. PROJECT WILL COMPLY WITH SECTION 6.302, URBAN FORESTRY.

6. PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED INTERCONNECTINGALL BUILDINGS AND STREET ROW.

7. LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED IN ACCORDANCE WITHCITY OF FORTH WORTH CODE.

8. FIRE HYDRANTS WILL BE LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENTIN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FIRE CODE.

9. ALL GROUND MOUNTED AC UNITS WILL BE SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPE SCREENING.

LEGEND

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

ADJOINERS

BUILDING SETBACK

EASEMENT

PROPOSED CURB

26' EMERGENCYACCESS EASEMENT

240

SITE DATA

23.1 UNITS PER ACRETOTAL NUMBER OF APARTMENT UNITS:PROPOSED DENSITY:

GROSS ACREAGE: ±10.391 ACRES

TOTAL LAND AREA: 452,656 SQ. FT."D" OPEN SPACE REQUIRED = 35.0% 158,430 SQ. FT.

24.00 UNITS PER ACREALLOWABLE "D" DENSITY:

EXISTING ZONING:

PROPOSED ZONING:

"D" OPEN SPACE PROVIDED = 35.0% 159,008 SQ. FT.

( IN FEET )

0 50

1 inch= 50 ft.

25 10050GRAPHIC SCALE

NOTES:· 2% MINIMUM OF THE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE

· TANDEM PARKING SPACES SHALL BE ASSIGNED TO THE SAMEUNIT NUMBER AS THE GARAGE IT FRONTS.

PARKING DATA

EXISTING LAND USE:PD-971 (PD-D)

PROPOSED LAND USE:

UNDEVELOPED/VACANTPD-DMULTI-FAMILY

VICINITY MAPNot To Scale

SP-17-010

PD SITE PLAN

THE TRAILS AT SUMMERCREEK MULTI-FAMILY

LEGAL DESCRIPTION:BEING a tract of land situated in the Juan Albirado Survey, Abstract No. 4, City ofFort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas and being a part of that certain tract of land asdescribed as Tract 3 by deed to SLF IV/Legacy Capital, L.P., recorded in CountyClerk's Document No. D213014509 and correction deed, recorded in CountyClerk's Document No. D214151266, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, thename was amended by Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of State forTexas, dated, November 21, 2014 to SLF IV - Chisholm Trail, L.P., recorded inCounty Clerk's Document No. D215126386, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas.

PARKING REQUIRED:1 SPACE PER BEDROOM = 358 BEDROOMS1 SPACE PER 250 S.F. OF COMMON AREA = 4,800 SQ. FT.

378 TOTAL PARKING = 1.58 SPACES/UNIT

PARKING PROVIDED:GARAGE SPACES 75

SURFACE SPACES 221TANDEM SPACES 75ADA SPACES 8

379 TOTAL PARKING = 1.58 SPACES/UNIT

Building Type I41,357 S.F.

Building Type III32,871 S.F.

Building Type IV17,321 S.F.

Building Type II41,026 S.F.

BUILDING LEGENDScale: 1" = 60'

Fitness2,050 S.F.

Car Wash2,116 S.F.

1

T6

T

PARKING / TANDEM / GARAGEPARKING COUNT

TANDEM PARKING

BUILDING NUMBER

BUILDING ENTRANCE/EXIT

PROPOSED DECORATIVE FENCE

6

Clubhouse5,584 S.F.

OPEN SPACE AREA

G6

TT T

TT

TT

TT

T

T T T T

TTT

TT

TT

T

TT

TT

TT

T

TT

T

TT

TT

TT

TT T

TT

TT

TT

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

TT

T

T

T

TT

TT

T

TT

T

TT

T

T

T

T

T

T

SUMMER CREEK DRIVE

EX-16'' W

EX-16'' W

EX-16'' W

EX-16'' W

EX-16'' W

EX-16'' W

EX-16'' W

EX-16'' W

EX-16'' W

EX-16'' W

EX-15'' SS

EX-15'' SS

EX-15'' SS

EX-15'' SS

EX-15'' SS

ZONE CFCOMMUNITY FACILITIES

ZONE GINTENSIVE COMMERCIAL

ZON

E E

NEI

GHBO

RHO

OD

COM

MER

CIAL

PROPOSEDBUILDING TYPE II

41,026 SF

PROPOSEDBUILDING TYPE III

32,871 SF

PROPOSEDBUILDING TYPE I

41,357 SF

PROPOSEDBUILDING TYPEIII

32,871 SF

PROPOSEDBUILDING TYPE III

32,871 SF

PROPOSEDBUILDING TYPE II

39,750 SFPROPOSED

BUILDING TYPE II41,026 SF

PROPOSEDBUILDING TYPE I

41,357 SF

PROPOSEDBUILDING TYPE III

32,871 SF

PROPOSEDBUILDING TYPE IV

17,321 SF

PROPOSEDDOG PARK

CARWASH

2,116 SF

CLUBHOUSE5,584 SF

POOLFITNESS2,020 SF

64

4

344

6

7

5

7

6

5

3

5

3

4

8

9

9

7

4

4

5

6

7

7

5

8

9

2

6

6

33

6

5

6

45

3

T4

T9

T8

T7

T7

G8

T7

T9

T9

3

7

7

7

10

1

2

3G9

G4

G7

T8

G7

G7

G8

G9

G9

G7 T7 9

4

5

6

7

PROJECTLOCATION

AutoCAD SHX Text
(VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY)
AutoCAD SHX Text
5' SIDEWALK
AutoCAD SHX Text
5' SIDEWALK
AutoCAD SHX Text
5' SIDEWALK
AutoCAD SHX Text
SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY PARK CABINET B, SLIDE 1832 P.R.T.C.T.
AutoCAD SHX Text
SUMMER McPHERSON, L.P. C.C.D. NO. D215230158 D.R.T.C.T.
AutoCAD SHX Text
SUMMER McPHERSON, L.P. C.C.D. NO. D215230158 D.R.T.C.T.
AutoCAD SHX Text
CITY OF FORT WORTH C.C.D. NO. D215249319 D.R.T.C.T.
AutoCAD SHX Text
CITY OF FORT WORTH VOLUME 13242, PAGE 390 D.R.T.C.T.
AutoCAD SHX Text
60' ROW DEDICATED FOR SUMMER CREEK BOULEVARD CABINET B SLIDE 1832 P.R.T.C.T. (NOT IMPROVED)
AutoCAD SHX Text
CITY OF FORT WORTH 30' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT C.C.D. NO. D207195357 D.R.T.C.T.
AutoCAD SHX Text
PAVEMENT
AutoCAD SHX Text
PAVEMENT
AutoCAD SHX Text
PAVEMENT
AutoCAD SHX Text
DUMPSTER WITH SCREENING FENCE AND DOORS TYP
AutoCAD SHX Text
AUTOMATED SLIDING GATE
AutoCAD SHX Text
PROPOSED 8' DECORATIVE METAL FENCE
AutoCAD SHX Text
PROPOSED 8' DECORATIVE METAL FENCE
AutoCAD SHX Text
20' FRONT SETBACK
AutoCAD SHX Text
5' SIDE SETBACK
AutoCAD SHX Text
5' SIDE SETBACK
AutoCAD SHX Text
20' FRONT SETBACK
AutoCAD SHX Text
5' SIDE SETBACK
AutoCAD SHX Text
PAVEMENT
AutoCAD SHX Text
PROPOSED 8' DECORATIVE METAL FENCE
AutoCAD SHX Text
PROPOSED 8' DECORATIVE METAL FENCE
AutoCAD SHX Text
MONUMENT SIGN
AutoCAD SHX Text
AUTOMATED SLIDING GATE
AutoCAD SHX Text
AUTOMATED SLIDING GATE
AutoCAD SHX Text
PAVEMENT
AutoCAD SHX Text
PAVEMENT
AutoCAD SHX Text
EXISTING 5' SIDEWALK
AutoCAD SHX Text
EXISTING 5' SIDEWALK
AutoCAD SHX Text
ADA RAMPS
AutoCAD SHX Text
OLD GRANBURY ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
FORT
AutoCAD SHX Text
CITY
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIMIT
AutoCAD SHX Text
LEMONWOOD
AutoCAD SHX Text
CHANELVIEW
AutoCAD SHX Text
WAY
AutoCAD SHX Text
CLEBURNE
AutoCAD SHX Text
WEST
AutoCAD SHX Text
FOUR WINDS
AutoCAD SHX Text
HORIZON
AutoCAD SHX Text
NUTWOOD
AutoCAD SHX Text
WILLOW
AutoCAD SHX Text
RED
AutoCAD SHX Text
SPICEBUSH
AutoCAD SHX Text
PARKWOOD
AutoCAD SHX Text
LANDMARK
AutoCAD SHX Text
SWEETGUM
AutoCAD SHX Text
LONGMEADOW
AutoCAD SHX Text
WAY
AutoCAD SHX Text
PEAR-
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
APPLEWOOD
AutoCAD SHX Text
YELLOWLEAF
AutoCAD SHX Text
SONGBIRD
AutoCAD SHX Text
COLUMBUS
AutoCAD SHX Text
RIDGE
AutoCAD SHX Text
SILVER
AutoCAD SHX Text
CREEKMOOR
AutoCAD SHX Text
PAMPAS
AutoCAD SHX Text
HARMONY
AutoCAD SHX Text
GREENGAGE
AutoCAD SHX Text
BARBERRY
AutoCAD SHX Text
MAHONIA
AutoCAD SHX Text
MEADOW LAKE
AutoCAD SHX Text
BLOSSOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
GRASSLAND
AutoCAD SHX Text
SYCAMORE
AutoCAD SHX Text
SCHOOL
AutoCAD SHX Text
TRAIL LAKE
AutoCAD SHX Text
DEW DROP
AutoCAD SHX Text
STARRY
AutoCAD SHX Text
MORNING
AutoCAD SHX Text
SUMMER
AutoCAD SHX Text
CREEK
AutoCAD SHX Text
LEAFY
AutoCAD SHX Text
DUSTY
AutoCAD SHX Text
COLUMBUS
AutoCAD SHX Text
XAVIER
AutoCAD SHX Text
EVENING STAR
AutoCAD SHX Text
BROOKWAY
AutoCAD SHX Text
OLD GRANBURY
AutoCAD SHX Text
OLD CLEBURNE
AutoCAD SHX Text
CROWLEY JUNCTION
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIMIT
AutoCAD SHX Text
WORTH
AutoCAD SHX Text
CITY
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIMIT
AutoCAD SHX Text
FORT
AutoCAD SHX Text
STUART - FELTZ
AutoCAD SHX Text
STUART - FELTZ
AutoCAD SHX Text
SOUTH
AutoCAD SHX Text
HULEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
W CLEBURNE
AutoCAD SHX Text
CEN TEX
AutoCAD SHX Text
CTRL
AutoCAD SHX Text
FORT
AutoCAD SHX Text
WORTH
AutoCAD SHX Text
WORTH
AutoCAD SHX Text
OLD CLEBURNE
AutoCAD SHX Text
HIGHWAY 121
AutoCAD SHX Text
McPHERSON BLVD
AutoCAD SHX Text
SUMMER CREEK DR
AutoCAD SHX Text
HULEN ST
AutoCAD SHX Text
RISINGER RD
AutoCAD SHX Text
UP
AutoCAD SHX Text
UP
Page 6: (Comments made by Platting (Subdivision …apps.fortworthtexas.gov/council_packet/render_file.asp?...Creek South, and Panther Heights neighborhood associations. The reek Ranch HOASummer

560 0 560280 FeetA Com prehens iv e P lan shall not c ons titu te z oning r egulations ores tab l is h z oning d istrict boundaries . (Texas Loc al Governm ent Code, S ection 213.005.) Land use des ignations were approv ed by City Counci l on M arc h 7, 2017.

Future Land Use

SP-17-010

Cr eated: 5 /11/2017 5 :14:44 PM

TOLLWAY / FREEWAY

PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL

MAJOR ARTER IAL

MINOR ARTERIAL

Vacant, Undeveloped, Agricultural

Rural Residential

Suburban Residential

Single Family Residential

Manufactured Housing

Low Density Res ident ial

Medium Density Residential

High Density R esident ial

Institutional

Neighborhood Commercial

General Commercial

Light Indus trial

Heavy Industrial

Mixed-Use

Industrial Growth Center

Infras truc ture

100 Year Flood Plain

Public Park, Recreation, Open Space

Private Park, Recreat ion, Open Space

Lakes and Ponds

Ü

Page 7: (Comments made by Platting (Subdivision …apps.fortworthtexas.gov/council_packet/render_file.asp?...Creek South, and Panther Heights neighborhood associations. The reek Ranch HOASummer

0 700 1,400350 Feet

Aerial Photo Map

SP-17-010

Ü

Page 8: (Comments made by Platting (Subdivision …apps.fortworthtexas.gov/council_packet/render_file.asp?...Creek South, and Panther Heights neighborhood associations. The reek Ranch HOASummer

Draft ZC minutes (not verbatim) June 14, 2017

Paula Fimbres 2533 Concina Way Opposition Spoke at hearing

Pam McAlister 6020 El Campo Ave Opposition Spoke at hearing

Peter Arendt 6012 El Campo Opposition Sent letter

13. ZC-17-091 UV Towne Crossing LP (CD 7) – 9001 and 9101 Tehama Ridge Pkwy (Presidio Addition, Parts Of Lots 3 & 4, Block B, 5.14 acres) From: “C” Medium Density Multifamily and “G” Intensive Commercial To: PD/G Planned Development for all uses in “G” Intensive Commercial plus mini warehouse; site plan included Bill Dahlstrom, 901 Main St, Dallas, TX, gave a brief presentation about the proposed development along with the surrounding development. He showed renderings of elevations. John Gonzales, 2313 Grand Rapids, spoke in opposition. He stated that a mini warehouse would be an eyesore in the retail area and would lower property values. He stated there are 13 storage facilities within 6 miles of the property. Motion: Following brief discussion, Mr. Aughinbaugh recommended Approval of the request, seconded by Ms. Conlin. The motion passed 6-1 with Mr. Gober voting against. Document received for written correspondence ZC-17-091

Name Address In/Out 300 ft

notification area

Position on case Summary

Bill Dahlstrom 901 Main St, Dallas, TX Support Representing Applicant

John Gonzales 2313 Grand Rapids Opposition Spoke at hearing

Reata Ranch HOA Opposition

Various Opposition 3 emails & 4 notices

14. SP-17-010 Chisolm Summer Creek LLC (CD 6) - 9100 - 9400 blocks Summer Creek Drive (Juan Albirado Survey, Abstract No. 4, 10.36 acres) From: PD 971"PD/D" Planned Development for all uses in "D" High Density Multifamily with a maximum of 24 units per acre; site plan required To: Provide required site plan for PD 971 for multifamily Chance LeBlanc, 550 Bailey Ave #400, representing the applicant, stated they are seeking approval for the site plan for the multifamily development, and mentioned they met with three neighborhood associations at the councilmember’s request. Motion: Following brief discussion, Ms. Runnels recommended Approval of the request, seconded by Ms. Conlin. The motion passed unanimously 7-0. Document received for written correspondence SP-17-010

Name Address In/Out 300 ft Position on case Summary

jordanl
Line
Page 9: (Comments made by Platting (Subdivision …apps.fortworthtexas.gov/council_packet/render_file.asp?...Creek South, and Panther Heights neighborhood associations. The reek Ranch HOASummer

Draft ZC minutes (not verbatim) June 14, 2017

notification area

Chance LeBlanc 550 Bailey Ave #400 Opposition Representing Applicant

Candleridge HOA Opposition

Summer Creek Ranch HOA Opposition

15. ZC-17-092 BOA Sorte, LP Et Al. (CD 7) – 9000-9900 blks Park Dr, 8900-9300 Boat Club Rd, 10101, 10125, 10151, 10159 Saginaw (See Exhibit in Case File, 862 acres) From: “AG” Agricultural, “E” Neighborhood Commercial, "I" Light Industrial To: PD/A-5 Planned Development for all uses in “A-5” One-Family with development standards related to lot sizes and lot coverage; site plan waiver requested and “E” Neighborhood Commercial Marcella Olson, 2040 Glenn Terrace, representing the applicant, gave a presentation showing the differences between the original zoning case and the current proposal. The PD will have a minimum lot size of 6000 square feet along with other development regulations. Jeff Longspaugh, 7617 Skylake Dr., spoke in opposition. He stated the proposal is not compatible or consistent with the current land uses and the comprehensive plan. He stated there has been a lack of reasonable negotiation. Melissa Lindelow, 9965 Saginaw, represented adjacent industrial property owners and stated concerns with the existing industrial uses that will be adjacent to the project. They are worried that new residences next to the industrial uses will complain and hurt their business that is allowed by right. Jay Dennis, 9965 Saginaw, stated there are a lot of heavy trucks on the road as well as a lot of lights. He stated he is worried about retaliation. He asked for a continuance. David Adams, 9514 Park Dr, spoke in opposition. He wants the applicant to relook at the development. Richard Henderson, 9510 Park Dr, stated he has lived in the area for 18 years and the infrastructure for more homes is not there. He said he will agree with city staff until they come back with something real. James Vance, 9516 Park Dr, owns 20 acres nearby. He wanted to know what the price range would ne. He believes it will bring down the property values in the area with the small lot development. During the rebuttal, Ms. Olson stated the price range is $250,000 to $400,000. The current roads are not good, but they will be building two 4-lane roads with the development. She stated they would be okay with a unit cap. Motion: Following brief discussion, Mr. Aughinbaugh recommended Approval of the request, amended to include a 2,500 unit cap and a 100’ landscape buffer between industrial and

jordanl
Line