7
Lack of useful data and Lack of useful data and accountability hinder policymakers and accountability hinder policymakers and the public from making informed the public from making informed decisions and prevents higher decisions and prevents higher education from demonstrating its education from demonstrating its contribution to the public good.” contribution to the public good.” “. . .become more transparent about cost, price, and student success outcomes and … willingly share this information with students and families.” Commission on Future Commission on Future of Higher Education of Higher Education

Commission on Future of Higher Education

  • Upload
    kyoko

  • View
    42

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

“Lack of useful data and accountability hinder policymakers and the public from making informed decisions and prevents higher education from demonstrating its contribution to the public good.” - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Commission on Future of Higher Education

““Lack of useful data and accountability Lack of useful data and accountability hinder policymakers and the public from hinder policymakers and the public from making informed decisions and prevents making informed decisions and prevents higher education from demonstrating its higher education from demonstrating its

contribution to the public good.”contribution to the public good.”“. . .become more transparent about cost, price, and student success outcomes

and … willingly share this information with students and families.”

Commission on FutureCommission on Futureof Higher Educationof Higher Education

Page 2: Commission on Future of Higher Education

College Portrait: A Voluntary College Portrait: A Voluntary System of AccountabilitySystem of AccountabilitySMSM

Page 3: Commission on Future of Higher Education

Undergraduate SuccessUndergraduate Success& Progress Rate& Progress Rate

Data Source: National Student Clearinghouse

Alternative to single graduation rate – shows student advancement through higher education system

Graduated from State U

Still Enrolled at State U

Graduated from Another Institution

Still Enrolled at Another Institution

An 85% four-year success rate means that 85% of students starting in Fall 2000 either graduated or are still enrolled at a higher education institution four years later.

Retention of Fall 2005 First-Time, Full-time StudentsReturned for Fall 2006

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%91%

Counts for the Fall 200 entering class shown in the graph to the left• 4200 First-Time, Full-Time Students• 2500 Full-Time Transfer Students

Page 4: Commission on Future of Higher Education

College Cost College Cost CalculatorCalculator

Institutions can customize VSA

calculator or usetheir own

Individualized estimate of net cost

helps show that college is affordable

Data Sources: VSA Cost Calculator or Institution Calculator

The cost to attend AU varies based on the individual circumstances of students and may be reduced through grants and scholarships.

Click HereTo get a cost estimate for students like you!

Page 5: Commission on Future of Higher Education

Active Learning Experiencesxx% of seniors have participated in an internship program.

Group Learning Experiencesxx% of seniors have discussed course content with students outside of class.

Student Satisfaction xx% of seniors are satisfied with overall college experience.

Institutional Commitment to Student Learning and Successxx% of seniors are satisfied with tutoring or other academic assistance.

Student Interaction with Campus Faculty and Staff xx% of seniors are satisfied with their ability to find a faculty or staff mentor.

Experiences with Diverse Groups of People and Ideasxx% of seniors stated that their knowledge of people from different races/cultures is stronger since entering college.

Examples of selected questions from CSS for each construct

p. 4Student ExperiencesStudent Experiences& Perceptions& Perceptions

In addition, institutions participating in the VSA program measure student involvement on campus using one of four national surveys. Results from the one survey are reported for a common set of questions selected as part of VSA. Following are the selected questions from the 2005-06 College Senior Survey (CSS) from the Cooperative Institutional Research Program (CIRP). The questions have been grouped together in categories that are known to contribute to student learning and development. The results reported below are based on the responses of AU seniors who participated in the survey. NOTE: UNIVERSITIES MAY ALSO USE CSEQ, NSSE AND UCUES.

Page 6: Commission on Future of Higher Education

Common methodology evaluates whether learning gains (value-added) at an institution are what would be expected given the academic abilities of its students.

Actual average scores demonstrate absolute learning gains between frosh and seniors

SeniorScore

65

57

Average Institutional ScoresFreshman

Score

Critical ThinkingWriting Essay

44

38

CAAP Score Range: 20 to 80

Student Learning Student Learning OutcomesOutcomes

Note: Universities may use CAAP, MAPP or CLA tests.

Learning Gains Between Freshman Year and Senior YearCritical ThinkingThe increase in learning for the critical thinking module is <what would be expected> at an institution with students of similar academic abilities. Writing EssayThe increase in learning for the writing essay is <what would be expected> at an institution with students of similar academic abilities.

p. 5

Page 7: Commission on Future of Higher Education

www.voluntarysystem.orgwww.voluntarysystem.org

For Further Information and the For Further Information and the Complete VSA Template:Complete VSA Template: