Upload
marjory-banks
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Community Innovation In Action: How Place Affects Community Knowledge And Practices Jorge Hernandez, University of California, San Diego, Urban Studies and Planning ProgramJorge Hernandez, University of California, San Diego, Urban Studies and Planning Program
Date and Acknowledgement:Date and Acknowledgement:
2
3
4
51
•
6
Due to the rapid and continual urbanization of Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico living conditions in environmentally sensitive and vulnerable areas like Los Laureles Canyon (aka Goat Canyon) are pervasive. Informal settlements, informal dumpsites, and inadequate infrastructure are just some of the conditions that have filled most of the Tijuana River watershed’s microbasins and continue to directly impact San Diego
the central question: What types of community innovations emerge in the absence of formal regulations in watershed microbasins along the Tijuana-San Diego border-region?
•The complexities associated with the U.S.-Mexico border-region continue to increase; rapid urbanization and continual increase of informal settlements along watershed microbasins continue to strain environmental systems. Despite the degradation and depletion of valuable ecosystems, innovations rooted in community knowledge and practices may shine a positive light on a bleak situation.
•These findings may contribute to advancing increased integration between local communities and government agencies on both sides of the border
Findings 2.
Findings 1.
Key literature, sources, links
CONCLUSION
The findings demonstrate the quantitative differences in NGOs and government agencies that work specifically in the defined bioregion. By compiling all entities into a single dataset, categorical differences reveal that there is little variation in where an organization’s projects are located, however the actual projects may vary. Further analysis of the organizations’ partners reveal a sophisticated network of community organizations and government entities despite the apparent lack of an institutional framework in the Mexican side of the border. These findings are also supplemented by qualitative interviews of various stakeholders and the implications on the current conditions of bilateral cooperation and future implications
Fig 1. Area of concentration
The following report, utilizes a place-based theoretical framework in the analysis of community innovation within a bioregional scale,Using the dataset compiled of existing organizations working in the border region and qualitative interviews of key informants
The findings demonstrate the quantitative differences in NGOs and government agencies that work specifically in the defined bioregion. By compiling all entities into a single dataset, categorical differences reveal that there is little variation in where an organization’s projects are located, however the actual projects may vary.
36 organizations and agencies were found to work within the defined bioregion18 total government agencies, 17 total NGOs, and one University entity are documented
Within the total number of organizations found: 8 government agencies and 8 NGOs had one or more projects in the defined area
Further analysis of the organizations’ partners reveal a sophisticated network of community organizations and government entities despite the apparent lack of an institutional framework in the Mexican side of the border.
Fig. 2. Watersheds
MethodologyIntroduction
Purpose of the Study