Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Comparative Mission ExperienceContinuities and Coalescences
among Southern California Tribal Groups
John R. JohnsonSanta Barbara Museum of Natural History
Federally Recognized Tribes in Southern California
Field’s & Lightfoot’s Critique of Kroeberian Anthropology
• There exists a correlation between native groups receiving land allocations and Indian peoples studied by Berkeley anthropologists
• Unacknowledged status of Central California tribes resulted from ethnographic practices of early 1900s.
“The authoritative anthropological literature of the time minimized the cultural identities of many groups. . . and even claimed that some of these groups had become culturally extinct . . . [Field 1999:190]”
Comparison of Six Missions
San Buenaventura, founded 1782 Santa Barbara, founded 1786
La Purísima, founded 1787 Santa Inés, founded 1804
San Fernando, founded 1797 San Luis Rey, founded 1798
Different Missionary Approaches
Fr. Junípero SerraFounded first Chumash missions,Advocated relocation of Indians
to missions after baptism
Fr. Antonio PeyríFounded Mission San Luis Rey,
Developed a decentralized system, Chapels built in outlying rancherías
Mission Locations and Associated Ethnolinguistic Territories
2
By 1840, Spanish-Mexican colonists outnumbered Mission Indians in the Chumash region.
History of Chumash Indians after Secularization
Mexican Land Grants, 1834-1846 (Hornbeck 1983)
Post-Secularization Chumash Communities Chumash Indians at Mission Santa Bárbara, 1878
Mission San Buenaventura, 1830s (Alfred Robinson 1846) Island Chumash Settlement at Kamexmey in the 1840sas remembered by Fernando Librado Kitsepawit
3
Chumash Musicians at San Buenaventura, 1873 San Buenaventura, 1880s
José Peregrino Winay & wife Susana Juan Esteban Pico
Juan Esteban Pico’s Ventureño Chumash Lexicon Candelaria Valenzuela Apolonia Guzman & Petra Pico with Petra’s great granddaughter
4
Santa Inés Chumash Community at Zanja de Cota
Rafael’s Home at Zanja de Cota(Henry Chapman Ford sketch, abt. 1880)
Rafael Solares, capitán of the Santa Inés Indians
(Leon de Cessac, 1879) Francisca Solares at Old College Hotel in Santa Ynez
Adobe House at Zanja de Cota, about 1900 Santa Ynez Indian Reservation, established 1901
John Harrington and Fernando Librado reconstructing a Tomol, 1913
María Solares, 1916
Ineseño Chumash speaker
5
Luisa YgnacioNu’tu, 1913
Barbareño Chumash speaker
Ventura County Fair, 1923
Contemporary Chumash Indians, descended from all former mission communities
Mission San Fernando (Edward Vischer, 1865)
Indians of Mission San Fernando after Secularization
Some Families Returned to Former Tribal Homelands:Juan José Fustero and Family, Piru Area Diseño accompanying Samuel’s Land Grant near San Fernando Valley, 1843
6
Rogerio, Chief of the San Fernando Indians, evicted from
his land at Pacoima in 1884
Elderly women at Mission San Fernando, Late 19th Century
Canyon Country (upper Santa Clara River Valley) where some Fernandeño families relocated after eviction from homes near San Fernando
Family of Dolores Cooke and Neighbors at Their Property near Castaic, 1880s
Descendants of Dolores Cooke in Newhall, 1990s(members of San Fernando Band of Mission Indians)
Diseño for El Tejón Land Grant, 1843
Granted to José Antonio Aguirre and Ignacio Del Valle by Governor Manuel Micheltorena
1851 Tejón Treaty
7
Sebastian Military Reserve, 1853-1864
Official Map, Tejón Reservation, encompassing 49,928 acres
Sebastian Military Reserve at Tejón,the first Indian reservation in California, 1853
Tejón Indian AdobeCarlton Watkins photograph, about 1889
Tejón Indians listed in the 1880 Census (part)
Tejón Indian Chapel, dedicated 1878
Tejón Indians at Chapel, about 1910
8
Indian Residents at Tejón, 1905
Altamirano Badío, Fernandeño and
Kitanemuk consultant
María IgnaciaYokuts consultant
José Juan OlivasVentureño Chumash
consultant
Tejon Indian Photographs taken by Edward S. Curtis, about 1916
Eugenia MendezChief Juan Lozada
John Harrington’s Research at Tejón Ranchería, 1917
L-R: Maria Gomez holding baby, Willy Gomez, Angela Lozada, Juana Encinas, Pete Gomez
Angela Lozada
Lands Occupied by the Tejón Indians, 1917 Tejón Indian School, Established in 1920s
9
Tejón Tribal Gathering, May 2005
Mission San Luis Rey in 1827 (Duhaut-Cilly)
History of Luiseño Indians after Secularization
From California Patterns (Hornbeck 1983)
Greater Survivorship at Mission San Luis Rey
Mission San Luis Rey padrones (census books) make possible the partial reconstruction of missing baptismal register.
Mission Register Data Collection
Native Polities Affiliated with Mission San Luis Rey
10
Baptismal pattern differs from Chumash regionin that native rancherías were not abandoned
but continued to be occupied throughout the Mission PeriodPala Assistencia, founded in 1816 to serve the
population of inland Luiseño rancherías
Mission San Luis Rey, 1830s (Alfred Robinson 1846)Land Grants in the vicinity of San Luis Rey
Luiseño and Cupeño Gathering at Pala, 1880sLuiseño Women at Mission Rededication , 1893
11
Residence of Omish Family, Rincon Reservation(C. H. Merriam Photo, Bancroft Library)
Allotments at Rincon Reservation, 1933
Home of Juan Sotelo Calac, Rincon Reservation, 1930s(J. P. Harrington photograph)
Ceremony at Wamkishat Juan Sotelo Calac Allotment,
Rincon Reservation, 1930s
(Photos from J. P. Harrington Collection,Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History)
Juan Sotelo Calac(at San Juan Capistrano)
Pala Reservation
Pala Reservation, about 1900 Pala Reservation, about 2000
Pala Casino Resort
12
Josie Subish and Raymond Basquez, Pechanga Reservation
Summary: Historical Roots for Lack of Federal Acknowledgement
• Not the fault of early twentieth century ethnographers
• Different missionization strategies
• Different demographic histories
• Usurpation of Indian lands located on Mexican Period ranchos
• Urban vs. rural locations