11
Comparison of DC and RF conditioning Jorge Giner-Navarro A.Degiovanni, N.Shipman, W.Wuensch and on behalf of the Breakdown studies and DC Spark team 09/04/2014 CLIC RF Structure Development Meeting

Comparison of DC and RF conditioning

  • Upload
    neveah

  • View
    38

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Comparison of DC and RF conditioning. Jorge Giner-Navarro A.Degiovanni , N.Shipman , W.Wuensch and on behalf of the Breakdown studies and DC Spark team 09/04/2014 CLIC RF Structure Development Meeting. Conditioning history of TD26R05CC at XBOX1 (CERN). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Comparison of DC and RF conditioning

Comparison of DC and RF conditioning

Jorge Giner-NavarroA.Degiovanni, N.Shipman, W.Wuensch

and on behalf of the Breakdown studies and DC Spark team09/04/2014

CLIC RF Structure Development Meeting

Page 2: Comparison of DC and RF conditioning

2

Conditioning history of TD26R05CC at XBOX1 (CERN)

J. Giner-Navarro - CLIC RF Structure Development meeting

09/04/2014

Page 3: Comparison of DC and RF conditioning

3

History plot of TD24R05 at NEXTEF (KEK)

T. Higo CLIC Workshop 2014J. Giner-Navarro - CLIC RF Structure Development meeting

09/04/2014

1060 BDs 591 BDs

Conditioning BDR measurements

Page 4: Comparison of DC and RF conditioning

4

History plot of HRR Fixed-Gap System at DC Spark lab

(window= 50M Pulses)

J. Giner-Navarro - CLIC RF Structure Development meeting

09/04/2014

Voltage pulse lengthtp=12 µs

Gap = 15µm

Page 5: Comparison of DC and RF conditioning

509/04/2014

Normalized Surface Electric Field

𝐸𝑠

𝑡𝑝−1 /6 BDR1/30

𝐸𝑠∝𝐸0∝𝑡𝑝− 1/6BDR1/30

Gradient scaling law

J. Giner-Navarro - CLIC RF Structure Development meeting

Page 6: Comparison of DC and RF conditioning

6

Normalized Surface Electric Field𝐸𝑠

𝑡𝑝−1 /6 BDR1/30

Same conditioning level at different number of BD

J. Giner-Navarro - CLIC RF Structure Development meeting

09/04/2014

Page 7: Comparison of DC and RF conditioning

7

Normalized BreakDown Rate

BDR

E s❑30 𝑡𝑝

5

BDR∝ E s❑30 𝑡𝑝

5BDR scaling law

J. Giner-Navarro - CLIC RF Structure Development meeting

09/04/2014

Page 8: Comparison of DC and RF conditioning

8

Thank you for your attention !

J. Giner-Navarro - CLIC RF Structure Development meeting

09/04/2014

Page 9: Comparison of DC and RF conditioning

9

EXTRA SLIDES

J. Giner-Navarro - CLIC RF Structure Development meeting

09/04/2014

Page 10: Comparison of DC and RF conditioning

10

Normalized BreakDown Rate per unit Area

BDR / AE s

❑30𝑡𝑝5

J. Giner-Navarro - CLIC RF Structure Development meeting

09/04/2014

Area with 95% of the max Electric field:

TD26R05CC 646 mm2

TD24R05 612 mm2

FFG electrodes 5655 mm2

(approx estimation)

Page 11: Comparison of DC and RF conditioning

11

Evolution of BDR vs Surf E field

J. Giner-Navarro - CLIC RF Structure Development meeting

09/04/2014

• For the same Es , BDR decreases• We reach same level of BDR with

higher Es

HRR Fixed Gap System