Click here to load reader
Upload
vahombe
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 Comparison of OSA With Concrete Options
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-osa-with-concrete-options 1/5
UKTel/Fax : 01303 864343
www.hesselberg-hydro.com
Information for Chelmsford FAS
____________________________________________________________________________________________Page 1 of 5
Comparison of alternatives :
Specification
Grasscrete GC2 Dycel 155 Open Stone Asphalt
Thickness (mm) 150 150 150 200
Unit Weight
(kg/m2)
~220? 230 300 400
Geotextile filter As per literature As per literature Propex 6081 or
similar
Propex 6081 or
similar
Max Flow Rate
(m/s)
8 m/s 8 m/s 9.8 m/s* 9.8 m/s*
Surface voids 40%? - uniform 30% - uniform 20-25% - Irregular 20-25% - Irregular
*Average during overtopping tests
Installation
Grasscrete GC2 Dycel 150 Open Stone AsphaltPreparation Earthworks to correct line
& level
Earthworks to correct line
& level
Earthworks to correct line &
level (by others)
Underlayer Very regular profile (sand
blinding advised to ensure
formers sit correctly)
Very regular profile (sand
blinding advised to ensure
blocks sit correctly)
Regular profile (in-situ
material follows minor
irregularities)
Geotextile Yes Yes Yes
Erosion
Protection
Rigid layer Individual blocks Bound flexible layer
Edge Details As per literature Beams 7 anchors Thickening at edge
Expansion
Joints
Every 10m x 10m Every 10m x 10m Not required
Topsoil Placed in holes plus layer
over surface
Placed in holes plus layer
over surface
Layer over surface
Installation :
• The installation time for an Open Stone Asphalt (OSA) revetment is usually significantly less than
for a concrete revetment. (approx. 2 weeks for 3,300m2, actually 1 week for 2,200m
2 at Forres)
• The installation is a simple process with easily-managed quality control steps.
• No sand blinding is required to form a perfectly regular formation. OSA will follow minor
undulations in the formation.
• No expansion joints required.
• No separate edge details are required. Against structures and along the edges of the constructionthe OSA may be thickened by ~100mm.
8/10/2019 Comparison of OSA With Concrete Options
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-osa-with-concrete-options 2/5
Information for Chelmsford FAS
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 2 of 5
Technical Information :
An OSA layer of 150mm thick results in 300 kg/m2
plus topsoil. This is approx. 30% heavier than
the Dycel 150 layer which is approximately 230 kg/m2 plus topsoil.
OSA is permeable and homogeneous with a void content of 20-25%. Used as a protection layer it
acts as one large bound plate which relies on its permeability and monolithic nature to withstand the
hydraulic loads associated with overtopping spillways.
The in-situ OSA can follow all contours and changes in gradient with ease.
Asphalt is a bound, flexible material and so can withstand settlements expected with new
earthworks without any detrimental effects. Settlement below a concrete block revetment may
cause the blocks to move leading to protruding edges and gaps, or voids may be ‘bridged’ beneath a
rigid grasscrete layer
If damage were to occur, the damage is limited in a bound material. With concrete blocks theremoval of one block can lead to rapid progressive failure of a large area.
A gravel blinding is often specified with block systems as the gravel makes a significant
contribution to the friction between the blocks, on which resistance to pull-out depends. This
unbound gravel is vulnerable in very high water flows.
Brochures and examples of the use of OSA are included.
Design Flow Velocities :
In April 2008 Rijkswaterstaat executed tests with a dike overtopping simulator on an Open Stone Asphalt
revetment. Each test, with increasing water volume/flow rate was carried out for 6 continuous hours. The
highest flow rate achievable with the apparatus was 1.22 m3 /s/m, resulting in a maximum water velocity of
9.8 m/s and this test was also carried out for 6 hours. Open Stone Asphalt showed no sign of damage after
the tests.
In the 1980’s the stability of OSA in high water velocities has been tested at the Delft Hydraulics
Laboratory, Holland, and also in a test canal. The maximum velocities tested were 6 m/s and 7m/s
respectively. In the test canal the OSA was placed on geotextile over a subsoil of fine sand (D50 = 110µm),
without any damage to the asphalt or migration of the subsoil.
OSA mattresses are used for scour protection in ports and so the material has to withstand very high
currents generated by ships’ propellers. The maximum water velocities generated are of the order of 10m/s, but the velocity over the mattresses is considered to be 6-7 m/s.
As with concrete blocks, OSA has not been tested much beyond ~7/8 m/s because the test flumes are not
capable of achieving higher flows. Flows of 10 m/s may have been achieved in the field, and OSA has
performed very well in areas of high water velocities.
8/10/2019 Comparison of OSA With Concrete Options
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-osa-with-concrete-options 3/5
Information for Chelmsford FAS
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 5
Durability
• OSA is a very robust material against impact and abrasive loads.
• Asphalt is a flexible material and so can withstand and follow settlements expected with newearthworks
• In areas prone to vandalism, OSA has been used successfully.
• Plants growing through the asphalt will not damage it as the material can withstand deformations
over time (thermoplastic properties).
• The oldest OSA revetments (coastal) are in excess of 40 years old and are still performing well.
Aesthetics
• The most common treatment for the OSA in spillway applications is the addition of a layer oftopsoil over its surface plus application of seed if required. The thickness of topsoil will depend on
the types of plants/grasses desired, location (water), etc.. A thin layer (~50mm) of soil will allow
the roots to penetrate through the OSA which will help retain the vegetation during overtopping
events. In some cases a full 150mm layer of soil may be used to provide a totally ‘soft’ appearance
with the erosion protection layer beneath.
• Once the grasses grow over the revetment, the roots will penetrate through the open structure of thematerial and will then be able to survive longer through dry periods. The OSA forms a complete
layer over the embankment, helping to retain moisture, whereas some concrete blocks have holes
through the whole block which allows the underlayer to dry out more quickly.
• In the short term the grasses/plants will be dictated by the types of seed applied, but in the long
term, the area will 'naturalise' with wind blown seeds of local plants. Surveys in Holland and
Norfolk have shown that in the long term a wider variety of plants are found over OSA revetments
than over concrete block revetments. It is thought that the regular voids in the blocks suit certain
plants, which over time become dominant. The voids on the OSA surface are smaller and irregular.
8/10/2019 Comparison of OSA With Concrete Options
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-osa-with-concrete-options 4/5
Information for Chelmsford FAS
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 4 of 5
Environmental
• The aesthetics are discussed above.
• OSA is compatible with the environment – it is used in drinking water reservoirs, SSSI’s, etc.Asphalt is manufactured with bitumen refined from petroleum which is inert and will not harm the
environment. Tests investigating the leachability of PAHs, heavy metals and other chemicals from
bitumen show that concentrations in the test water was well within the surface water limits for EEC
countries, and were also more than an order of magnitude lower than the current EEC limits for
potable water.
• OSA can be produced at practically any asphalt mixing plant, so the material procurement willbenefit the local community.
• At the end of its design life, OSA can be recycled as a fill material. After a research project with
the Dutch authorities into manufacturing new asphaltic materials using reclaimed OSA, it is now
accepted as a sustainable material by the Dutch authorities.
.
Quality Control
• A typical specification for the material is enclosed.
• Prior to work on site the Open Stone Asphalt is designed using the raw materials available at themost convenient mixing plant to supply the project. This mix design is carried out in our laboratory
and is submitted for approval prior to works commencing on site.
• During the project our engineer supervises the mixing at the plant and the following checks are
made- mixing temperature
- placing temperature
- placing thickness
- sample analysis to check constituents (daily)
- raw materials checked (weekly/monthly)
8/10/2019 Comparison of OSA With Concrete Options
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparison-of-osa-with-concrete-options 5/5