Upload
kenneth-goodwin
View
221
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Comparison of Test and Analysis
Modal Analysis and Testing
S. Ziaei-Rad
S. Ziaei-Rad
Objectives
Objectives of this lecture:
• to review some of the different types of structural models which are derived from modal tests;
• to discuss some of the applications to which the model obtained from a modal test can be put;
• to prepare the way for some of the more advanced applications of test-derived models.
S. Ziaei-Rad
Applications Of Test-derived Models
•comparison with theoretical model
•correlation with theoretical model
•correction of theoretical model
•structural modification analysis
•structural assembly analysis
•structural optimisation
•operating response predictions
•excitation force determination
S. Ziaei-Rad
Strategy For Model Validation
S. Ziaei-Rad
Types Of Mathematical Model
Spatial model Modal model Response model
S. Ziaei-Rad
Derivation Of Model From Modal Test
Step 1 - measure Step2 - modal analysis
Step 3 - model
S. Ziaei-Rad
Theory/Experiment ComparisonComparisons possible:
(a) FRFs b) Modal Properties
Modal Properties-Natural Frequencies-Mode Shapes
S. Ziaei-Rad
Comparison of Modal Properties1- Comparison of Natural Frequencies
Natural Frequencies
Standard Comparison ji
jijiNFD
,min
),(
S. Ziaei-Rad
Comparison of Modal Properties
Mode shapes
2- Mode Shapes (Graphical)
S. Ziaei-Rad
Comparison of Modal Properties
Modes 1,2 & 3(systematic error)
Modes 1,2 & 3(remeasured)
2- Mode Shapes (Graphical)
S. Ziaei-Rad
Correlation Of Modal Properties2- Mode Shapes (numerical correlation)
Modal scale factor (MSF) - slope of best-fit line from {}1 vs {}2 plot
Or if we take the experimental mode as reference
If
If
n
jjXjX
n
jjXjA
XAMSF
1
*
1
*
)()(
)()(
),(
n
jjAjA
n
jjAjX
XAMSF
1
*
1
*
)()(
)()(
),(
1),(),(}{}{ AXMSFXAMSFAX
/1),(, ),(}{}{ AXMSFXAMSFAX
S. Ziaei-Rad
Correlation Of Modal Properties2- Mode Shapes (numerical correlation)
Mode Shape Correlation Coefficient, or Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC)-scatter of points about best fit line:
Or
If
If
MAC A X
X j A jj
n
X j X jj
n
A j A jj
n( , )
.
*
* *
1
2
1 1
}{}{}{}{
}{}{),(
2
AT
AXT
X
AT
XXAMAC
1),(),(}{}{ AXMACXAMACAX
1),(),(}{}{ AXMACXAMACAX
S. Ziaei-Rad
MAC Correlation Between Two Sets Of Modes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
S1
S3
S5
S7
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Experimental Mode Number
S. Ziaei-Rad
Natural Frequency Plot For CorrelatedModels
.. paired by frequencies .. paired by CMPs
S. Ziaei-Rad
Data for Correlated ModesFREQUENCY MATCHED CORRELATED UPDATED
Exp. Exp freq. FE FE. freq. diff. FE FE freq. diff. Updated Updat. FE diff.mode (Hz) mode (Hz) (%) mode (Hz) (%) FE mode freq. (Hz) (%) no. no. no. no.
1 9.2 7 10.5 14 7 10.5 15 7 8.9 -32 14.5 8 9 18.3 26 8 14.7 13 16.1 9 17.1 6 10 20.3 26 10 17 44 17.0 10 18.3 8 8 17.1 0 9 15.8 -75 21.5 11 20.3 -5 11 26.5 23 11 22.6 56 27.0 12 26.5 -2 14 43.4 61 12 26 -47 30.2 13 13 38.8 28 13 32.8 98 35.3 14 38.8 10 17 71.7 103 14 33.9 -49 40.8 15 43.4 6 16 60.4 48 15 45.9 13
S. Ziaei-Rad
Effectiveness Of The Correlation Process
Some features of the MAC (which affect its effectiveness):• lack of scaling (so not a true orthogonality measure)• inadequate selection of DOFs• inappropriate selection of DOFs
Modified versions of the MAC:• the AutoMAC• the Mass-Normalised MAC• the Selected-DOF MAC
S. Ziaei-Rad
Inadequate Selection of Dofs in Mac
MAC using all DOFs MAC using subset of DOFs
S. Ziaei-Rad
Use of Automac to Check Adequacy of DOFs
AUTOMAC is the MAC computed from the correlation ofa set of vectors with themselves
AIUTOMAC using all DOFs AIUTOMAC using subset of DOFs
S. Ziaei-Rad
Use of Automac to Check Adequacy of DOFs
a- Automac(A) for full set of 102 DOFsb- Automac(A) for reduced set of 72 DOFsc- Automac(A) for reduced set of 30 selected DOFsd- Automac(X) for reduced set of 30 selected DOFse- MAC for reduced set of 30 DOFs
A
S. Ziaei-Rad
Normalised Version Of The MacMass-normalised MAC can be computed using theanalytical mass matrix from:
NCO A X
W
W W
X
T
A
X
T
X A
T
A
( , ).
2
-Weighting matrix W, can be provided either by mass or stiffness matrices of the system.-The difficulty is the reduction of the mass or stiffness matrices to the size of the measured DOF-A Guyan type or a SEREP-based reduction can be used. If SEREP used then a pseudo-mass matrix of the correct size can be calculated as ][][][ TRM
S. Ziaei-Rad
Normalised Version Of The Mac
Approximate mass-normalised MAC (SCO) can be
computed using the active modal properties only:
SCO A X
X
T T
A
X
T T
X A
T T
A
( , ).
2
][][][ TRM
SCO = SEREP-Cross-Orthogonality
S. Ziaei-Rad
Normalised Mac - Features
AUTOMAC for test case AUTOSCO for test case
S. Ziaei-Rad
Error Location - The COMAC-COMAC is a means of identifying which DOFs display the
best or the worse correlation across the structure.
-COMAC uses the same data as is used to compute the MAC
but it performs the summation of all contributions (one from
each DOF for each mode pair) across all the mode pairs
instead of across all the DOFs (as is done in the MAC)
-COMAC is defined as:
COMAC A Xi i
X il A ill
L
X ill
L
A ill
L( , ).
2
1
2
1
2
1
S. Ziaei-Rad
COMAC - Example 1
S. Ziaei-Rad
COMAC - Example 2
S. Ziaei-Rad
Correlation Of Other Parameters:Frequency Response Functions
The Assurance Criterion concept can be applied toany pairs of corresponding vectors (not only modeshape vectors) including FRFs - to give the FRAC -
and also to vectors of Operating Deflection Shapes, insituations where modal properties are difficult to obtain
FRAC A XH H
H H H Hj i
X i
T
A j
X i
T
X i A j
T
A j
( ( ), ( )).
2
S. Ziaei-Rad
Correlation Of Other Parameters:Frequency Response Functions
L
i
L
iijkAijkX
L
iijkAijkX
k
HH
HHjFRAC
1 1
22
1
2*
)()(
)()()(
Frequency Response Assurance Criterion:
S. Ziaei-Rad
Example Of FRAC Plot