Upload
derrick-mclaughlin
View
214
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Competing for FundingCompeting for Fundingin thein the
Biomedical SciencesBiomedical Sciencesfrom the National Institutes of Health & Elsewherefrom the National Institutes of Health & Elsewhere
October 28, 2008
John [email protected]
Office of Proposal DevelopmentTexas A&M University
Texas A&M Health Science Center
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
2
Texas A&M UniversityTexas A&M UniversityOffice of Proposal DevelopmentOffice of Proposal Development
• Unit of Office of Research and Graduate Studies• Supports Texas A&M faculty in the development
and writing of research and educational proposals• center-level initiatives • multidisciplinary and multi-institutional research teams • research affinity groups• junior faculty research • diversity in the research enterprise• a suite of grant writing training programs to help faculty
develop and write more competitive proposals
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
3
OPD Member ListOPD Member List• Jean Ann Bowman, PhD [email protected]
Physical Geography/Hydrology, earth, ecological, environmental
• Mike Cronan, PE, BS (Civil/Structures), BA, MFACenter-level proposals, research and educational partnerships, new proposal and training initiatives
[email protected]• Lucy Deckard, BS, MS (Materials) [email protected]
New faculty initiative, fellowships, engineering/physical science proposals, equipment, and instrumentation
• John Ivy, PhD (Molecular Biology) [email protected] biomedical and biological science initiatives
• Phyllis McBride, PhD (English) [email protected] writing training, biomedical, editing
• Libby Pasciak [email protected], workshop management, project coordination
• Robyn Pearson, BA, MA (Anthropology) [email protected] sciences and humanities proposals, editing and rewriting
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
4
OOffice of Proposal Developmentffice of Proposal DevelopmentOPD-WEB OPD-WEB http://opd.tamu.edu/http://opd.tamu.edu/
• For an electronic version of this presentation• Funding opportunities & how to search for
them• Junior faculty support• Proposal development resources• Grant writing seminars and workshops• PI perspectives on competitive proposals• Craft of Grant Writing Workbook• Agency Toolkits
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
5
For more infoFor more info• Go to http://opd.tamu.edu
click “Seminar Materials”then “Seminars by Date” look for this seminar• For an electronic version of this
presentation • For additional resource
materials• Lists of helpful links• “Toolkit” on NIH
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
6
General Strategies for Writing General Strategies for Writing Competitive Proposals – TopicsCompetitive Proposals – Topics
• Finding Research Funding Opportunities• Analyzing the RFP & Its Role in Proposal
Development• Analyzing and Assessing the Agency Culture,
Mission and Research Priorities• Understanding the Review Process & Writing
to Reviewers• Overview of How to Write a Competitive
Project Summary & Proposal Narrative
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
7
If you don’t write grants, If you don’t write grants, you won’t get anyyou won’t get any
• Target the proposal at the intersection where:
• research dollars are available
• your research interests lie
• available time to write a competitive proposal
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
8
Finding Research Funding Finding Research Funding OpportunitiesOpportunities
• Who
• What
• Where
• How
• The agencies you're searching
• The type of project or grant mechanism
• Where do you find their RFPs?
• How do you find or learn of their RFPs?
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
9
Your Research Interests will Your Research Interests will define funding sourcesdefine funding sources
• Your research interests should align with the Mission of the Agency
• Biology• Biomedicine• Health disparities• Behavior• Biochemistry• Computational science• Interdisciplinary studies
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
10
Know the category of funding in Know the category of funding in which you are interestedwhich you are interested
• Research• Training• Fellowship• Student retention• Student recruitment• Diversity• Curriculum• Loan reimbursement
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
11
Funding Sources for Funding Sources for Biomedcial ResearchBiomedcial Research
• National Institutes of Health $29 bill.• National Science Foundation $6 bill.• Dept. of Health & Human Services• Department of Defense• Foundations• Environmental Protection Agency• US Department of Agriculture• National Aeronautics & Space Admin.
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
12
Where do you find the RFPs?Where do you find the RFPs? (Who ya gonna call?)(Who ya gonna call?)
• Network with colleagues• Funding sources cited in
literature acknowledgements• Companies and Foundations that
support professional societies• Google searches• University posted listings• Federal agency web sites• Foundation web sites• Discussions with Agency and
Foundation Representatives• E-mail listserves (last but not
least)
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
13
Example Example of a of a
Google Google SearchSearch
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
14
OPD-Web Funding OpportunitiesOPD-Web Funding Opportunities
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
16
Grants.govGrants.gov
The Grants.gov web portal serves as a single point of access for all federal agency grant announcements. New funding announcements from federal agency are posted to this site daily, and a range of other features allow subscribing to email funding alerts, linking to agency web sites, and searching for funding among agencies.
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
17
http://www.grants.gov/http://www.grants.gov/
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
18
Search & Browse Grant OpportunitiesSearch & Browse Grant Opportunities
• Searchhttp://www.grants.gov/applicants/search_opportunities.jsp
• Browse agencieshttp://www.grants.gov/search/agency.do
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
19
Grants.gov SearchGrants.gov Search
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
20
VaccineVaccine Keyword Results Keyword Results
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
21
Grants.gov Browse by AgencyGrants.gov Browse by Agency
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
22
Receive Grants.gov Funding Email AlertsReceive Grants.gov Funding Email Alerts
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
24
http://foundationcenter.org/pnd/rfp/ http://foundationcenter.org/pnd/rfp/
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
25
Life Science Funding Source ListingsLife Science Funding Source Listings• Grants.gov http://www.grants.gov
• National Institues of Health• Office of Extramural Research http://grants.nih.gov/grants/OER.htm • Individual Institutes and Centers
• National Science Foundation http://www.nsf.gov/ • Find Funding http://www.nsf.gov/funding/ • Funded Research http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/
• GrantsNet sponsored by AAAS and HHMI http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org /funding
• Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programshttp://cdmrp.army.mil/funding/default.htm
• Philanthropy News Digest RFP listings http://foundationcenter.org/pnd/rfp / • American Cancer Society http://www.cancer.org/docroot/RES/RES_0.asp• American Heart Association http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=9713
• Cancer Research Institute http://www.cancerresearch.org/criprogs.html• Life Sciences Research Foundation http://www.lsrf.org/geninfo.htm• National Multiple Sclerosis Society http://www.nationalmssociety.org/
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
26
Identifying funding opportunitiesIdentifying funding opportunitiesSUMMARYSUMMARY
• Develop search protocols to fit research interests
• Know relevant agencies
• Learn grant cycles
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
27
NSF Biological Sciences DirectorateNSF Biological Sciences Directorate• The mission of the Directorate for
Biological Sciences (BIO) is to enable discoveries for understanding life. BIO-supported research advances the frontiers of biological knowledge, increases our understanding of complex systems, and provides a theoretical basis for original research in many other scientific disciplines.
• NSF supports fundamental research in science and engineering, except for the medical sciences
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
28
NSF Biological Sciences NSF Biological Sciences Directorate - DivisionsDirectorate - Divisions
• Biological Infrastructure• Environmental Biology• Emerging Frontiers• Integrative Organismal Systems• Molecular & Cellular Biosciences
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
29
NIH MissionNIH Mission• NIH is the steward of medical and
behavioral research for the Nation. Its mission is • science in pursuit of fundamental
knowledge about the nature and behavior of living systems and
• the application of that knowledge to extend healthy life and reduce the burdens of illness and disability.
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
30
FY 2007 Operating PlanFY 2007 Operating PlanNIH Discretionary Budget Authority $29.228 BillionNIH Discretionary Budget Authority $29.228 Billion
>80% awarded to >325,000 extra-mural researchers
>80% awarded to >325,000 extra-mural researchers
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
31
It's competitive out there ~ NIH It's competitive out there ~ NIH Congressional AppropriationsCongressional Appropriations
Bil
lio
ns
of
Do
llar
s
DOUBLING
$13.7$15.6
$17.8
$20.5
$23.3
$27.1$28.0 $28.6 $28.6
$29.2
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
FY1998
FY1999
FY2000
FY2001
FY2002
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2007
NIH FY2007: Increase of $620 million
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
32
New Grant Applications and New Grant Applications and Success Rates Success Rates During and After During and After
Doubling PeriodDoubling Period
Success Rates Applications
Projected
Num
ber of Applications
% S
ucce
ss R
ate
of G
rant
s F
unde
d
31%
19%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
19981999200020012002200320042005200620070
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
+8,303
+8,359
22%
49,656
43,069
24,154
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
33
Success Rate: FY 2007Success Rate: FY 2007It's competitive out there!It's competitive out there!
• Research Project Grant application overall success rate
• 47,455 applications• 10,100 funded• 21.3% success rate
• New 18.2%• Continuation 38.7%• Supplements 33.7%
• Research Project Grant application overall success rate
• 47,455 applications• 10,100 funded• 21.3% success rate
• New 18.2%• Continuation 38.7%• Supplements 33.7%
DP1, DP2, P01, R01, R03, R15, R21, R33, R34, R36, DP1, DP2, P01, R01, R03, R15, R21, R33, R34, R36, R37, R55, R56, RL1, RL2, RL5, RL9, U01, U19R37, R55, R56, RL1, RL2, RL5, RL9, U01, U19
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
34
Competition for funds from the NIH and other sponsors, intensifying year by year, now stands at an unprecedented level, and shows no sign of abating. Never before have so many established investigators faced so much uncertainty about their longevity as active scientists. Never before have so many novices faced so many disincentives to entering or continuing a research career.
Dr. William F. Raub, NIH Associate Director for Research and Training, strategy paper, 1982
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
35
NIH – 20 Institutes, 7 CentersNIH – 20 Institutes, 7 Centers
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
36
National Institutes of HealthNational Institutes of Health• NIH is a basic research agency
• Each Institute has its own mission• Each Institute has its own budget• Each Institute has its own activities• Each Institute has its own ways of doing things
When you’re planning to submit a grant, check with Program Officers from different institutes to determine their specific policies and interest in your science.
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
37
Identify NIH Funding OpportunitiesIdentify NIH Funding Opportunities
• NIH Office of Extramural Researchhttp://grants1.nih.gov/grants/oer.htm
• NIH Guide for Grants and Contractshttp://grants1.nih.gov/grants/guide/index.html
• Search by keyword• Browse by Requests for Applications (RFAs)• Browse by Program Announcements (PAs)• Automatic funding alerts
• Institutes and Centers (IC) homepages• Listed at http://www.nih.gov/icd
• Go to IC homepage• Browse or search their “Research Funding” or "Extramural
Funding” section
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
38
NIH Funding MechanismsNIH Funding Mechanisms
• Three principal types• Training — T & F
• Career — K
• Research Project Grant — R
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
39
Unsolicited vs. SolicitedUnsolicited vs. Solicited• NIH makes a distinction between solicited
versus unsolicited proposals• Unsolicited (investigator-initiated) proposals
(82%)• Parent Announcements (Program Announcements, PA)
• Solicited (agency-initiated) proposals (18%)• Program Announcements (PA)
• New research programs and updates to ongoing programs (renewable)
• Request for Applications/Proposals (RFA/RFP)• One time request to fulfill specific agency research
objective or need
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
40
NIH NIH TTraining Awardsraining Awards• Individual Training awards – for predoctoral (F31),
postdoctoral (F32), or senior fellowships (F33)• Limited to US citizens or legal aliens
Ruth L. KirschsteinNational Research Service Awards (NRSA)
Institutional Research Training Grants (T32)
Short-Term Institutional Research Training Grants (T35)
Individual Predoctoral Awards For M.D./Ph.D. Fellowships (F30)
Individual Predoctoral Fellowship Minority Students (F31)
Individual Predoctoral Fellowship Students w/ Disabilities (F31)
Individual Predoctoral Fellowship (F31)
Individual Postdoctoral Fellowships (F32)
Senior Fellowships (F33)
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
41
NIH Career DevelopmentNIH Career DevelopmentK AwardsK Awards
• Directed at retraining, professional career development, or recognition of career success
• K Kioskhttp://grants1.nih.gov/training/careerdevelopmentawards.htm
• Career Award WizardHelps you select the right career awardhttp://grants.nih.gov/training/kwizard/index.htm
• Participation may be restricted to certain Institutes and Centers
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
42
NIH Career AwardsNIH Career Awards• K Kiosk http://grants1.nih.gov/training/careerdevelopmentawards.htm • Career Award Wizard - Helps you select the right career award
http://grants.nih.gov/training/kwizard/index.htm
• Some directed at retraining, professional career development, and recognition of career success (may be restricted to certain ICs)• K01 Mentored Research Scientist
• Provide mentored career development in a new research area• 3-5 yr, 75% effort
• K02 Independent Scientist• Provides support for newly independent scientists (see IC provisions) who
can demonstrate the need for a period of intensive research focus as a means of enhancing their research careers.
• 3-5 yr, 75% effort• K05 Senior Scientist
• Provides protected time for outstanding senior scientists who have demonstrated a sustained high level of productivity conducting biomedical research
• NIAAA and NIDA only• 5 yr, 75% effort
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
43
NIH Career AwardsNIH Career Awards• K07 Academic Career
• Supports individuals interested in introducing or improving curricula in a particular scientific field
• 2-5 yrs, 25-75% effort• K08 Mentored Clinical Scientist
• Provides support and “protected time” to individuals with a clinical doctoral degree for an intensive, supervised research career development experience
• Biomedical and behavior research• 3-5 yr, 75% effort
• K12 Mentored Clinical Scientist Development• Institutional programs to support the research career development of clinicians only or
clinicians and Ph.D. basic research scientists • 5 yr, 75% effort
• K18 Career Enhancement Award for Stem Cell Research• To encourage investigators to obtain the training they need to appropriately use stem
cells in their research
• K22 Career Transition• Supports an individual postdoctoral fellow in transition to a faculty position• 3 yr, 75% effort
• K23 Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Career Development• Development of the independent research scientist in the clinical area• 3-5 yr, 75% effort
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
44
NIH Career AwardsNIH Career Awards• K24 Midcareer Investigator Awards in Patient-Oriented Research
• Development of clinical mentors conducting funded research.• 3-5 yr, 25-50% effort
• K25 Mentored Quantitative Research Career Development• To foster interdisciplinary collaboration in biomedical research by
supporting career development experiences for scientists with quantitative and engineering backgrounds
• 3-5 yr, 75% effort• K26 Midcareer Investigator Award In Mouse Pathobiology
Research• Provides support for established pathobiologists who wish to devote
up to 50 percent of their effort to research and mentoring in the field of mouse pathobiology
• 25-50% effort• K30 Clinical Research Curriculum Development
• Institutional award for development of a clinical research curriculum • 5 yr, up to $200,00/yr
• K99/R00 NIH Pathway to Independence (PI)• 2 years mentored postdoctoral research + 3 years independent
research in tenure track position (or equivalent)
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
45
NIH NIH RResearch Program Grantsesearch Program Grants
• Numerous funding mechanisms• R01 Research Project Grant
• Supports discrete, specific, highly successful outcome projects
• All ICs support this mechanism• R03 Small Grant
• Supports small research projects; limited time and resources are the key elements
• R21 Exploratory/Independent Research Grant
• Supports ‘high risk-high yield’ research projects
• R15 Academic and Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Grant
• Small research projects in the biomedical and behavioral sciences conducted by students and faculty in health professional schools and other academic components that have not been major recipients of NIH research grant funds
Research Grant Programs
NIH Research Project Grant Program (R01)
NIH Small Grant Program (R03)
NIH Support for Conferences and Scientific Meetings (R13 and U13)
NIH Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Grants (R15)
NIH Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant Award (R21)
NIH Clinical Trial Planning Grant (R34) Program
NIH High Priority, Short-Term Project Award (R56)
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
46
NIH NIH RResearch Program Grantsesearch Program Grants
• R01 Research Project Grant
• R03 Small Research Grant• R21 Exploratory,
Developmental Research Grant
• R15 Academic and Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Grant
Research Grant Programs
NIH Research Project Grant Program (R01)
NIH Small Grant Program (R03)
NIH Support for Conferences and Scientific Meetings (R13 and U13)
NIH Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Grants (R15)
NIH Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant Award (R21)
NIH Clinical Trial Planning Grant (R34) Program
NIH High Priority, Short-Term Project Award (R56)
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
47
Research Grants for Independent ScientistsResearch Grants for Independent Scientists
• R01 – Large Research Grant• 4-5 years, $250,000+/yr
• R03 – Small Grant• 2 year max, $50,000/yr max
• R21 – Exploratory Research Grant• High Risk – High Reward• Transformational• 2 years, $275,000 total
• R15 – Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA)• Primarily undergrad institutions• Institute must have received <$3mill/yr in NIH funding
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
48
Finding NIH FundingFinding NIH Funding• Search All Federal Agencies – Grants.gov• Search all of NIH – NIH OER• Search your favorite NIH IC(s)
– NIH IC home pages• Sign up for email notices by
weekly/daily listserves• Sign up for RSS feeds• Other strategies – Other sources
• Google• Colleagues• National Science Foundation• Acknowledgements in publications• Philanthropy News Digest / The Foundation Center• Commercial search providers – Community of Science (COS)
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
49
Finding NIH FundingFinding NIH Funding• Office of Extramural Research (OER)
about http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/intro2oer.htm• Publishes Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) for all
NIH Institutes and Centers (ICs)• NIH funding opportunities page
• OER Home pagehttp://grants.nih.gov/grants/oer.htm
• NIH Guide for Grants and Contractshttp://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/index.html
• Subscribe to weekly listserv!• Grants.gov
• Includes funding opportunities for NIH in addition to the other 25 federal grant-making agencies
• Located at http://www.grants.gov/Index • Subscribe to weekly listserv
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
50
Office of Extramural Research (OER)Office of Extramural Research (OER)
• NIH makes a distinction between solicited versus unsolicited proposals• Unsolicited (investigator-initiated) proposals (82%)
• Parent Announcements (Program Announcements, PA)
• Solicited (agency-initiated) proposals (18%)• Program Announcements (PA)
• New research programs and updates to ongoing
programs (renewable)• Request for Applications/Proposals (RFA/RFP)
• One time request to fulfill specific agency research objective or need
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
51
Funding Opportunity AnnouncementsFunding Opportunity Announcements
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
52
Application Due DatesApplication Due Dates
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
54
Parent AnnouncementsParent Announcements
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
55
Identifying NIH Solicitations by TopicIdentifying NIH Solicitations by Topic
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
56
Example – Sequencing TechnologyExample – Sequencing Technology
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
57
Example – Sequencing TechnologyExample – Sequencing Technology
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
58
Identifying NIH Solicitations by ICIdentifying NIH Solicitations by IC
• Search by Agency (IC)• Identify funding opportunities within an
agency• Steps for searching….
• Identify Agency (IC)• Go to their homepage
(http://www.nih.gov/icd)• Go to their “Research Funding” or Extramural
Funding” section• Perform search
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
59
Identifying NIH Solicitations by ICIdentifying NIH Solicitations by IC
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
60
Identifying NIH Solicitations by ICIdentifying NIH Solicitations by IC
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
62
Staying Staying Informed on Informed on NIH FOAsNIH FOAs
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
63
RSS Feed of NIH FOAsRSS Feed of NIH FOAs
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
64
Remember, investigator-initiated grants represent >80% of those funded by NIH!
Percentage of R01 and R29 Awards Allocated to Investigator-Inititated Applications, Program Announcements, and Requests for Application,
FY 1995 to FY 2003
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Fiscal Year
Per
cen
tage
of
Aw
ard
Dol
lars
in F
Y
Requests for Applications Awards
Program Announcement Awards
Investigator-Initiated Awards
Agency-initiated
Investigator-initiated
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
65
Elements of an NIH FOAElements of an NIH FOA
• A Funding Opportunity Announcement• Part I. Overview Information
• Issuing Organization• Participating Organizations• Components of Participating Organization• Title• Announcement Type• Program Announcement Number• Key Dates• Executive Summary
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
66
Contents of an NIH PAContents of an NIH PAPart II. Full Text of AnnouncementPart II. Full Text of Announcement
Section I. Funding Opportunity Description1. Research Objectives
Section II. Award Information 1. Mechanism(s) of Support 2. Funds Available
Section III. Eligibility Information 1. Eligible Applicants
A. Eligible Institutions B. Eligible Individuals
2. Cost Sharing or Matching3. Other - Special Eligibility Criteria
Section IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Information 2. Content and Form of Application Submission
3. Submission Dates and TimesA. Submission, Review and Anticipated
Start Dates 1. Letter of Intent
B. Sending an Application to the NIH C. Application Processing
4. Intergovernmental Review 5. Funding Restrictions6. Other Submission Requirements
Section V. Application Review Information 1. Criteria 2. Review and Selection Process A. Additional Review Criteria B. Additional Review Considerations C. Sharing Research Data D. Sharing Research Resources 3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates
Section VI. Award Administration Information 1. Award Notices 2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements 3. Reporting
Section VII. Agency Contact(s) 1. Scientific/Research Contact(s) 2. Peer Review Contact(s) 3. Financial/ Grants Management Contact(s)
Section VIII. Other Information - Required Federal Citations
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
67
Program SolicitationProgram Solicitation• From the PA or RPF –
• Determine supporting ICs• Identify mechanism (R, T, U, etc.)• Determine eligibility• Identify review criteria
• Learn essential information to develop and write a competitive proposal that is fully responsive to the agency’s objectives and review criteria.
• Continuously use the RPF throughout proposal development and writing as a reference point to ensure that an evolving proposal narrative fully addresses and accurately reflects the goals and objectives of the funding agency – including the review criteria.
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
68
Elements of the FOAElements of the FOA
• Funding Opportunity Announcement• NIH Small Research Grant Program
(Parent R03)
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
69
Program Solicitation, RFPProgram Solicitation, RFP• The solicitation represents an invitation by a
funding agency for applicants to submit requests for funding in research areas of interest to the agency or foundation.
• The RFP is not a menu or smorgasbord offering the applicant a choice of addressing some topics but not others, depending on interest, or some review criteria but not others.
• The RFP is a non-negotiable listing of performance expectations reflecting the stated goals, objectives, and desired outcomes of the agency.
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
70
Reviewing the RFPReviewing the RFP• Clarify ambiguities; if
unresolved… • Get clarification from a
program officer. • Ambiguities needs to be
resolved prior to proposal writing so the proposal narrative maps to the guidelines with informed certainty.
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
71
Role in Proposal OrganizationRole in Proposal Organization
• Use the RFP to develop the structure, order, and detail of the proposal narrative.
• Use the RFP as an organizational template during proposal development to help ensure every RFP requirement is addressed fully.
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
72
Reading Material Referenced in the Reading Material Referenced in the RFPRFP
• If the RFP refers to any publications, reports, or workshops, it is important to read those materials, analyze how that work has influenced the agency’s vision of the program, and cite those publications in the proposal in a way that illustrates the topics are acknowledged and understood.
• Echo the language of the agency.
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
73
Map your expertise to the RFPMap your expertise to the RFP
• Is it a fit?• Is it really a fit?
• No partial fits allowed
• No wishful thinking• Close doesn’t count
• If you are not a fit – don’t submit
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
74
Analyzing the funding agencyAnalyzing the funding agency• Analyzing the
mission, strategic plan, investment priorities, and culture of a funding agency provides information key to enhancing proposal competitiveness.
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
75
Analyze the Agency: NIH CultureAnalyze the Agency: NIH Culture
• Trans-NIH initiatives – research that cuts across typical agency boundaries of various ICs• http://www.nih.gov/about/transnih.htm
• Model Organisms for Biomedical Research• Blueprint for Neuroscience Research• Bioengineering Consortium• Biomaterials and Medical Implants• Bioinformatics at the NIH• Mammalian Gene Collection• Cognitive & Emotional Health
• Translational Research• Part of the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research• http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/ • http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/clinicalresearch/
overview-translational.asp
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
76
NIH Funding Investments and Priorities
• NIH has investment priorities based on past research findings and current trends in science
• Targeted areas (FY 2008 proposed budget): • HIV/AIDs• Biodefense• Roadmap for Biomedical Research• Enhanced Support for New Investigators• Physical Infrastructure
• NIH FY2007 budget is $28.8 billion (FY2008 proposed $28.85 billion)
• NIH funds research projects inside their own laboratories (intramural) and outside their laboratories at national and international locations (extramural)
• Extramural funding 85%• Intramural Funding 10%• Research Infrastructure 5%
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
77
Know your home-base IC's MissionKnow your home-base IC's Mission
About NIDA For Researchers
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
78
NIH Roadmap for Medical ResearchNIH Roadmap for Medical Research
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
79
NIH Roadmap for Medical ResearchNIH Roadmap for Medical Research
• Theme: New Pathways to Discovery• Building Blocks, Pathways, and Networks Implementation Group
• Molecular Libraries and Imaging Implementation Group
• Structural Biology Implementation Group
• Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Implementation Group
• Nanomedicine Implementation Group
• Theme: Research Teams of the Future• High-Risk Research Implementation Group
• Interdisciplinary Research Implementation Group
• Public Private Partnerships Implementation Group
• Theme: Re-engineering the Clinical Research Enterprise• Clinical Research Implementation Group
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
80
New Investigator ProgramNew Investigator Programhttp://grants.nih.gov/grants/new_investigators/index.htm http://grants.nih.gov/grants/new_investigators/index.htm
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
81
For New InvestigatorsFor New Investigators
• K99/R00 Pathway to Independence• Must have fewer than 5 yr postdoc experience• Open to US and non-US citizens• 2 yr mentored Post-doc; 75% effort required• 3 yr independent, tenure-track or equivalent position; 75%
research effort
• R01 – fast review for new investigators• Check box on cover page for new investigators• Example: Oct 5 Submit
Mar 1 Summary StatementMar 20 Resubmit (Mar 5, Jul 5, Nov 5)
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
82
For New InvestigatorsFor New Investigators• More lenient R01 payline for new
investigators (varies by IC)• In FY07, 500 R01 awards to be made to new
investigators
• DP2 – Director’s New Innovator Award• For exceptionally creative work of new
investigators• Requires highly innovative approaches that have
the potential to produce an unusually high impact• Must have completed doctoral degree within
~10 yr• Awards up to $300,00
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
83
A New Initiative:A New Initiative:Identify Early Stage Investigators Identify Early Stage Investigators
• Designed to encourage early transition to independence• the average age at which an investigator first obtains R01 funding has increased by more
than 5 years between 1980 to and 2001
• New Investigator: An NIH research grant Principal Investigator who has not yet competed successfully for a substantial, competing NIH research grant
• Early Stage Investigator (ESI): An individual who is classified as a New or First-Time Investigator and is within 10 years of completing his/her terminal research degree or is within 10 years of completing medical residency
• NIH will collect necessary data from the eRA Commons personal profile
• NIH will eliminate the New Investigator Check Box on the application face page
• New or First-Time Investigators will continue to be identified by determining whether the individual has had significant, previous NIH funding
• PD/PIs who receive a substantive, competing NIH research grant will lose their New Investigator status and hence their status as an ESI
• Applications from ESIs and New Investigators will be identified to reviewers so that appropriate consideration of their career stage can be applied during review
• New Investigators as well as ESIs will be eligible for the “Full Implementation to Shorten the Review Cycle for New Investigator R01 Applications Reviewed in Center for Scientific Review (CSR) Recurring Study Sections
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
84
Assess the Competition:Assess the Competition:Know what was recently fundedKnow what was recently funded
• Learning about recently funded research in your area helps you understand what an agency is looking for in the review process• Search on-line databases of funded projects• Review abstracts of funded proposals on agency
web sites• Talk to the principal investigators of funded
proposals in your area• Obtain copies of funded proposals
• Ask the PI
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
85
CRISPCRISP http://report.nih.gov/crisp/ http://report.nih.gov/crisp/
• Computer Retrieval of Informationon Scientific Projects
• A searchable database of federally funded biomedical research • What similar projects have been funded?• Has someone already been funded to pursue
my idea?• Who are my competitors?• Who are potential collaborators?
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
86
R03 Awards, FY2006-2008, Rice University
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
87
CRISP search resultsCRISP search results
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
89
Preparing ProposalsPreparing Proposals• All NIH proposals use either the
electronic form SF424 or the paper PHS398.
• The transition to SF424 for F and K awards is delayed
• Step 1: Download the Instructions and Forms via the NIH OER website• http://grants2.nih.gov/grants/
funding/424/
• http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html
• Step 2: READ THE INSTRUCTIONS
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
90
Writing for ReviewersWriting for Reviewers
• Reviewers often have 8 or 10 proposals to read
• Use white space, underlining, bold, bullets, figures, flowcharts to make main points easy to find
• Put main idea of sections and paragraphs up front
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
91
Must Convince Reviewers…Must Convince Reviewers…
• Your proposed research should be funded• It’s important and supports the agency
mission and program goals• It’s exciting• It has a good chance of succeeding
• You are the person who should conduct the proposed research• You are knowledgeable and well-qualified• You have the support and resources
required
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
92
Albert Einstein on Grant WritingAlbert Einstein on Grant Writing
• If you can't explain something simply, you don't understand it well.
• Most of the fundamental ideas of science are essentially simple, and may, as a rule, be expressed in language comprehensible to everyone.
• Any fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius – and a lot of courage – to move in the opposite direction.
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
93
Structure of ProposalStructure of Proposal
• Often dictated by solicitation or other agency document• NIH – SF424• NSF – Grant Proposal Guide• DoD – Broad Agency Announcement
(BAA)• Also guided by evaluation criteria
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
94
Before you begin . . .Before you begin . . .• Make sure you have identified the following:
• Goal• Indicates the purpose for the project as a whole• Should be aligned with the agency’s mission
• Aims (Objectives)• Indicate the purpose for each specific part of your project• Should be aligned with your overall goal• Should be specific and measurable
• Rationale• Indicates why you want to achieve your purpose• Should be clear and logical
• Expected outcomes• Indicate what will change as a result of your research
(e.g., behavior, performance, process, produce)• Should include both immediate and long-term outcomes
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
95
Speak with the Program OfficerSpeak with the Program Officer– – early and oftenearly and often
• Do your homework first
• Make an appointment
• Listen to the response
• Request clarification
• Follow up
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
96
Never be timid about contacting a Never be timid about contacting a program officer for clarificationprogram officer for clarification
• Timidity is never rewarded in the competitive grant process.
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
97
Common Elements of PHS398 R01Common Elements of PHS398 R01
• Cover page/face sheet• Description: Project Summary (Abstract) & Relevance• Performance site, key personnel• Table of contents• Budget page(s)• Budget justification• Biosketch of PI, biosketch of all other major/key personnel• Resources• Research Plan (Items A-D)• Other Information under Research Plan (Items E-J)
• References cited, human or animal research subjects, inclusion of minorities/children in clinical studies, data sharing plans, etc.
• Appendix items• Checklist
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
98
Know your NIH General Review CriteriaKnow your NIH General Review Criteria
• Investigator• Education, training, relevant experience
• Environment• Suitability of facilities and institution support
• Significance• Ability of the project to improve health
• Approach• Feasibility of methods and appropriateness of
budget• Innovation
• Originality of research
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
99
Introductory writing tipsIntroductory writing tips
• Summary (Abstract) and Introduction (Specific Aims) are key• May be all reviewers read• Must excite and grab the attention
• Reviewers will assume errors in language and usage will translate into errors in the science
• Don’t be overly ambitious in what you propose, but convey credibility and capacity to perform
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
100
Introductory writing tipsIntroductory writing tips
• Sell your proposal to a good scientist but not an expert
• Some review panels may not have an expert in your field, or panels may be blended for multidisciplinary initiatives
• Agencies & reviewers fund compelling, exciting research
• Proposals are not journal articles – proposals must be user-friendly and offer a narrative that tells a story that is memorable to reviewers
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
101
Cover SheetCover Sheet
• Requires that you provide basic information about yourself, your institution, and your proposed research project
• Often offers you the opportunity to indicate if you are a “new investigator” (until Feb. '09/)
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
102
TitleTitle• Used by agency administrators to route
your proposal to the appropriate reviewers• Should provide an accurate representation
of your proposed project• Should generate interest in and enthusiasm
for your proposed project• Should conform to agency requirements
• Program name• Number of characters (NIH: 81 incl. spaces)
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
103
Project Summary (Abstract)Project Summary (Abstract)
• Used by agency administrators to route your proposal to the appropriate reviewers
• Provides a concise overview of the proposed project
• Requires that you provide a great deal of information within a very limited amount of space (NIH – 30 lines)
• Becomes public record if the project is funded
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
104
Project Summary (Abstract)Project Summary (Abstract)
• One of the most critical sections• Consider writing the Abstract after you've written your
Research Plan• Use the same elements of the Specific Aims in the
same order• Include
• Brief introduction to the topic• Gap in knowledge or critical need• Broad, long-term goals• Specific Aims• Describe research design and methods• Summarize the Significance of the project• Avoid summary of past accomplishments• Avoid use of the first person
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
105
Project Summary (Abstract)Project Summary (Abstract)• May be the only thing the reviewer reads• Must “grab” the reviewer• Should communicate concisely:
• Intellectual framework of proposed project
• Your long-range goals
• Specific Aims
• Significance of the proposed project
• Who will be conducting the project and, briefly, their qualifications
• Project outcomes
• Must communicate excitement• Check for additional requirements
• e.g., intellectual merit and broader impacts in NSF proposals
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
106
Project RelevanceProject Relevance
• The second component of the Project Summary/Abstract (i.e., “Description”) is Relevance.
• Corresponds to "Project Narrative" in SF424 forms
• Using no more than two or three sentences, describe the relevance of this research to public health.
• Be succinct and use plain language that can be understood by a general, lay audience.
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
107
Budget & Budget JustificationBudget & Budget Justification
• Budget• Budget categories are defined by the funding agency
• Get help (institutional grants administrator)• Be reasonable. The reviewers also do research!
• Budget Categories• Direct
• Personnel• Equipment• Travel• Materials, Other Supplies
• Indirect • F&A (Facilities & Administrative)
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
108
Budget & Budget JustificationBudget & Budget Justification• Budget Justification
• Personnel• Who? What will they do? How much effort (%)? • Why is this person critical to the success of the project?
• Equipment• What do you need? Why do you need it? Is there a similar
apparatus nearby that you can use (if yes, why not use it)?• Travel
• Where do you need to go? How many times will you go there? How many of the project personnel will go? Approximately how much will it cost and why?
• Materials, Other Supplies• Equipment maintenance contracts? Fee for service resource?
• F&A• Determined by what your institution has negotiated• Limited by funding mechanism
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
109
Connect budget to the research narrativeConnect budget to the research narrative
• Be sure activities discussed in the narrative (Research Plan) are reflected in the budget
• In budget justification, personnel, materials, supplies, equipment, travel should reflect that necessary to complete Research Plan
• Base budget on real costs• Remember that reviewers know what
things cost • Factor in both direct and indirect costs• Factor in cost escalations for multi-
year projects
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
110
NIH Biographical SketchNIH Biographical Sketch
• Four page maximum• Section A. Positions and Honors• Section B. Publications
• List publications reflective of the topic of the current proposal (or maximum)
• Section C. Research Support• Current and completed support• Begin with projects that are most relevant
to the research proposed in the application
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
111
Biographical sketchBiographical sketch• Emphasize qualifications relevant to the
proposed project• Ability to conduct project• Ability to manage project
• Adhere to agency’s formatting requirements• Use the required form• Stay within prescribed page limits• Place information in the required order• If you are collaborating – format your
colleagues’ resumes like your own
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
112
Sample NIH Biosketch Sample NIH Biosketch (via http://grants.nih.gov/grants/OER.htm)(via http://grants.nih.gov/grants/OER.htm)
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
113
ResourcesResources
• Laboratory• Clinical• Animal• Computer• Office• Other
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
114
ResourcesResources
• Demonstrate that it is feasible to conduct the proposed research project at your institution
• Demonstrate that you are part of an intellectually stimulating and supportive research environment
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
115
Research PlanResearch Plan
Introduction (Resubmissions only)
A) Specific Aims
Long-range goals
Hypothesis
B) Background & Significance
C) Preliminary Studies / Progress Report
D) Research Design and Methods
Structure based on Specific Aims
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
116
Role of the Proposal NarrativeRole of the Proposal Narrative• Helps incubate ideas, concepts, connections & details• Synthesizes ideas and detail• Connects ideas to performance details• Develops order, logic, transitions, and connectedness• Helps the timing, logistics, and collaborations of proposal
development• Integrates collaborators’ ideas• Provides a common structure to meld disciplinary strands• Makes ideas accessible to others• Converges on a common language• A competitive narrative requires persistence, continuous
revisions, and many draft iterations to converge on perfection
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
117
Specific AimsSpecific Aims• Critically important
• Must provide a conceptual overview
• Must outline the project goals, objectives (aims), and expected outcomes
• Must be clearly written
• Must grab the reviewer’s attention
• Must generate enthusiasm for the project
• Must be able to stand alone
• Often Title, Abstract and Specific Aims may be the only three parts that all reviewers will have an opportunity to read
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
118
Specific AimsSpecific Aims
• PHS's Instructions"List the broad, long-term objectives and the goal of the specific research proposed, for example, to test a stated hypothesis, create a novel design, solve a specific problem, challenge an existing paradigm or clinical practice, address a critical barrier to progress in the field, or develop new technology. One page is recommended."
~Grants.gov Application Guide SF424 (R&R)
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
119
Specific AimsSpecific Aims
• Provide a framework for the reviewer• State a long-range goal of your research
program• Tie to program/agency mission and goals• State a specific hypothesis that your
experiments will address• Provide a rationale for your approach• State specific, measurable Specific Aims• Discuss expected outcomes• Do not be overly ambitious!
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
120
General organization of the Specific AimsGeneral organization of the Specific Aims
General
Specific
Introduction to the problem.
Identification of need or gap in knowledge.
Long term research goal and specific
project goal
Central hypothesis
Specific Aims
Project outcomes & benefits
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
121
Specific AimsSpecific Aims
• Write this section for all your audiences, primary reviewers and other reviewers, since they'll all read it.
• Choose aims the reviewers can easily assess. • To be assessable, make each specific aim an endpoint
rather than a best effort.
• Do not confuse specific aims with your project's long-term goals. • Specific aims are what you plan to accomplish by the end of
the grant.• Your aims are the accomplishments by which the success of
your project is measured.• Aims are not activities, e.g., measure, study
• One approach: organize this section into four paragraphs.
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
122
Specific Aims – Paragraph 1Specific Aims – Paragraph 1
• Introduce the project.• Relate the project to the agency’s mission.
• Educate the reviewer.• Summarize the important knowledge.
• Identify the gap in the knowledge or state the critical need.
• Identify the problem created by the gap or the critical need.
~Adapted from Morrison and RussellGrant Application Writer’s Workbook
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
123
Specific Aims – Paragraph 2Specific Aims – Paragraph 2
• Describe your long-range research or career goal(s).• Ensure that your long-range career goal aligns with the agency’s
mission.• State your overall project goal.
• Ensure that the overall project goal addresses an identified gap in knowledge and represents a step toward achieving your long-range career goal.
• Present your central hypothesis (or, alternatively, a statement of need).• Be sure that you present a true hypothesis – one that can be
objectively tested to determine its validity – rather than a predetermined conclusion.
~Adapted from Morrison and RussellGrant Application Writer’s Workbook
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
124
Specific Aims – Paragraph 2 (cont.)Specific Aims – Paragraph 2 (cont.)• Explain your rationale for pursuing the project.
• Indicate what it will be possible to accomplish when your research is complete.
• Describe your qualifications and research environment.• How you are better prepared than other, equally qualified
researchers.• Identify special training, expertise, experience, and, most
importantly, relevant preliminary data.• Identify access to human and animal subject pools; to
unique equipment and instrumentation; and to collaborations and partnerships.
• Why you are the best resercher in the best environment to address the research question.
~Adapted from Morrison and RussellGrant Application Writer’s Workbook
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
125
Your Central HypothesisYour Central Hypothesis
• The foundation of your application – the conceptual underpinning on which the entire structure rests.
• Generally applications should ask questions that prove or disprove a hypothesis rather than use a method to search for a problem or simply collect information.
• The goal of more applied research may be to discover basic biology or develop or use a new technology.• If your application is not hypothesis-based, state this in your
cover letter and give the reasons why the work is important.
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
126
Your Central HypothesisYour Central Hypothesis
• Choose an important, testable, focused hypothesis that increases understanding of biologic processes, diseases, treatments, or preventions and is based on previous research.
• State your hypothesis in both the Specific Aims section and the Abstract.
• Example of a good research hypothesis: • Analogs to chemokine receptors can inhibit HIV infection.
• Examples of a poor research hypothesis: • Analogs to chemokine receptors can be biologically useful.
• A wide range of molecules can inhibit HIV infection.
~ NIAID "How to Plan a Grant Application"
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
127
Specific Aims – Paragraph 3Specific Aims – Paragraph 3
• Delineate your specific aims in a bulleted list.• Ensure that specific aims correlate with your
central hypothesis.• Ensure that all specific aims relate to and support
your overall project goal.• Design your specific aims and experiments so
they answer the question posed by the hypothesis.• Provide conceptual rather than descriptive specific
aims.
~Adapted from Morrison and RussellGrant Application Writer’s Workbook
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
128
Specific Aims – Paragraph 3 (cont.)Specific Aims – Paragraph 3 (cont.)
• Delineate your specific aims in a bulleted list (cont.).• Delineate a reasonable number of specific aims,
presented in a logical order.• “Why” aims are generally stronger than “what” aims.• Define a clear purpose, working hypothesis or
statement of need, and expected outcome for each specific aim.
• Make sure no specific aim is dependent on the successful outcome of another aim.
~Adapted from Morrison and RussellGrant Application Writer’s Workbook
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
129
Specific Aims – Paragraph 4Specific Aims – Paragraph 4
• Identify the project’s innovation, e.g., a unique approach or technology
• Delineate the project’s expected outcomes• Should validate central hypothesis and resolve
gap in knowledge• Summarize the project’s significance • Provides segue to Background and
Significance
~Adapted from Morrison and RussellGrant Application Writer’s Workbook
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
130
Specific AimsSpecific Aims
• Don't be overly ambitious• 2-5 aims for an R01
• Avoid descriptive aims• No fishing expeditions; no look-and-see!
• Use brief, concise, informative, conceptual statements (headline style)
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
131
What vs. Why AimsWhat vs. Why Aims• "What" aims
• Determine amino acid sequence of protein Y of antiviral Z-sensitive wild-type virus X.
• Determine amino acid residue changes in protein Y of 100 natural antiviral Z-resistant virus X isolates.
• In culture, select for virus X variants that develop resistance to antiviral Z and identify altered protein Y residues.
versus• "Why" aim
• Identify virus X protein Y candidate amino acid residues responsible for antiviral resistance.
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
132
Background & SignificanceBackground & Significance
• Consider starting with Significance and tie into Specific Aims• Specify how your research will extend and
advance knowledge in the field; what you will be able to do following successful research that you cannot now do.
• Provide a literature review• Demonstrate your familiarity with the field
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
133
Background & SignificanceBackground & Significance
• Background should tie closely to your proposed research• Describe state of the field• Provide context for proposed project• Nature of the problem and Identification of the
opportunity• Alternative hypotheses or models• Be thorough and concise
• Do not be dismissive of previous research
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
134
SignificanceSignificance
• Consider placing up front• Explain explicitly why proposed
research is important• Tie to agency and program goals• Relate to review criteria (e.g., innovation)
• Make this easy to find• Opportunity to make important points
up front• Communicate your excitement!
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
135
Preliminary Data / Progress ReportPreliminary Data / Progress Report
• Discussion of preliminary data must connect clearly to proposed project
• Determine how much preliminary data to include• Can vary with funding mechanism
• Present the results in a logical order• Illustrate your results
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
136
Research Design & MethodsResearch Design & Methods
• Structure based on Specific Aims or Review Criteria• Be very clear about how you will accomplish your stated
goals and objectives• Include approaches and detailed methods• Include details
• What, specifically, will you do when you get the money?• Schedules and milestones may be helpful• This is especially important if you are a relatively new researcher
• Identify expected, measurable outcomes• Identify and address anticipated problems and how you
will deal with them• Avoid ambiguous terminology—be specific!
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
137
Project scheduleProject schedule• Delineate the key milestones• Incorporate the agency and program
requirements
Year 1 Year 2
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Aim 1: Evaluate the extent to which John of Rupescissa drew upon and expanded the research of his contemporaries
Task 1: Transcribe and collate manuscripts
Task 2: Translate manuscripts
Task 3: Analyze manuscripts
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
138
Research EthicsResearch Ethics• Address all relevant ethical issues regarding
inclusion of human and animal subjects and use of hazardous materials, select agents, or recombinant DNA• Justify use of human and animal subjects and or
hazardous materials, select agents, or rDNA• Demonstrate that potential benefits outweigh potential
risks• Delineate training procedures• Explain safeguards from potential risks• Discuss reporting procedures
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
139
Formatting RequirementsFormatting Requirements• Font
• Arial, Helvetica, Palatino Linotype, or Georgia typeface
• Black font color
• Font size of 11 points or larger
• Symbol font may be used to insert Greek letters or special characters; the font size requirement still applies
• Type density, including characters and spaces, must be no more than 15 characters per inch
• Type may be no more than six lines per inch
• Page Margins • Use standard paper size (8 ½" x 11)
• Use at least one-half inch margins (top, bottom, left, and right) for all pages
• Figures, legends, tables, graphs, charts, etc. may use smaller font
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
140
The funded proposalThe funded proposal
The author of a funded proposal has accomplished the basic goal of grant writing when she has• Ensured the reviewers were intrigued and
excited about the proposed research,
• Understood its significance, and
• Were confident in the researcher’s capacity to perform.
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
141
Review of NIH ProposalsReview of NIH Proposals• Center for Scientific Review (CSR)
• Administers and coordinates peer review• http://www.csr.nih.gov/default.htm
• Divisions (4)• Integrated Review Groups (IRG) – 23• Study Sections (SS) – 220
• Scientific Review Officer (SRO)• Members (peers with expertise in SS research)
• Standing members• Ad hoc members
• Study section rosters postedhttp://www.csr.nih.gov/Roster_proto/sectionI.asp
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
142
Center for Scientific Review
Scientific Review Group or IC Review Branch
IC Advisory Council
Institute Director
FUNDING DECISION
What happens when you submit an application?
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
143
Understand the NIH Review ProcessUnderstand the NIH Review Process
• Two-step Review process• Peer review is merit-based
• Applications receive three individual reviews• Scores range from 100–500• Written critiques provided to investigator
• Advisory Council or Board• Meritorious proposals considered against
mission, needs, and budget
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
144
Your application is reviewed Your application is reviewed at study section by:at study section by:
● Experts● Non-experts● People who are reading lots of grants● People who want to be excited by science● People who will be irritated by a sloppy application
Submit a high quality application!Have people review your application critically
well before submission
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
145
NIH General Review CriteriaNIH General Review Criteria
• Investigator• Education, training, relevant experience
• Environment• Suitability of facilities and institution support
• Significance• Ability of the project to improve health
• Approach• Feasibility of methods and appropriateness of budget
• Innovation• Originality of research
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
146
CSR – Review & ‘Streamlining’CSR – Review & ‘Streamlining’
• Proposal received at CSR• Assigned to an IRG, then to a Study Section (SS)• The Scientific Review Administrator (SRA) assigns a
primary, secondary, and tertiary reviewer• Investigator-initiated proposals (R01, R03, R21) are read by
the 1°, 2°, 3° reviewers• Bottom 50% of proposals are identified about 1 week
prior to the SS meeting (triaged or streamlined)• Streamlined applications receive summary statements
verbatim from each reviewer, but are not discussed nor scored
• All 3 reviewers must agree on the streamlined proposals in order for the proposal to be triaged
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
147
CSR – Scoring ProposalsCSR – Scoring Proposals• SS meets to review applications• Primary reviewer presents your proposal to the group (reads the
abstract)• SS members discuss your application, the primary reviewer is able to
answer questions about the proposal
• SS members assign a score to the proposal between 1-5 (1=outstanding, 5=forget it)
• After the meeting the SRA calculates the average score for each proposal, multiply by 100 to get a 3 digit score (100-500)• SRA calculates a priority score or percentile ranking of the score; based on
the past 3 cycles of grant scores within SS
• SRA prepares a written critique of your proposal based on reviewer’s comments
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
148
Three possible outcomes of Three possible outcomes of proposal reviewproposal review
1. Triaged
2. Discussed, scored, not funded
3. Discussed, scored, FUNDED!
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
149
Receive review commentsReceive review comments
• If your proposal is not funded…• Deal constructively with
rejection
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
150
Revisions & ResubmissionRevisions & Resubmission• Three strikes “you’re out”
• Read the reviewer’s comments• Take a break • Re-read the reviewer’s comments• Don’t take them personally• Read the reviewer’s comments,
AGAIN• Call the program officer for more
feedback• Evaluate if you should resubmit
• Begin working on the revisions. Incorporate the revisions that you think make your proposal better than the previous submission
XXTwoTwo
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
151
Interpreting Reviews – Planning to Interpreting Reviews – Planning to ResubmitResubmit
• Were certain issues mentioned consistently?• Plan how to address those issues
• Did the reviewers misunderstand your proposal?• Plan how to make your text more clear
• Was no clear issue mentioned?• May not have excited reviewers enough• May not be an area they wish to fund now• May not fit into their research portfolio
• Many funded proposals were funded after multiple submissions → intelligent perseverance is the key!
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
152
Revise and resubmit your applicationRevise and resubmit your application
• Respect the views of reviewers• Review the reviews• Decide whether or not you have a
viable project• If you don’t, revise the idea or come up
with a new one• If you do, revise and resubmit the
application
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
153
Receive review commentsReceive review comments
• If your proposal is funded…
Celebrate!
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
154
Tips for Success at NIHTips for Success at NIH• Understand NIH’s mission and overall goals
• Propose research topics that cross the boundaries of various IC
• Leverage tools and resources from other research areas to approach your research topic
• Create multidisciplinary research teams
• Focus on NIH priorities• Search for funding opportunities often and using
different strategies, e.g., agency or topic search, and submit unsolicited proposals when possible
• Look for various opportunities to acquire funding, e.g., diversity supplements, career awards
• Partner with established NIH investigators
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
155
Tips for Success with NIH GrantsTips for Success with NIH Grants
• Read the solicitation• Sign up for the Weekly NIH Funding
Opportunities and Notices• Identify your "IC home"• Get to know your Program Officer• Study the "how-to" NIH websites• Develop a descriptive title• Write a concise, non-ambiguous
Abstract/Summary• Write Specific Aims that are hypothesis-
driven with clear, measurable outcomes
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
156
The Last Word:The Last Word:The proposal is the only realityThe proposal is the only reality
A proposal is not unlike a novel or a movie. It creates its own, self-contained reality. The proposal contains all the funding agency and review panel will know about your capabilities and your capacity to perform. With few exceptions, an agency bases its decision to fund or not fund entirely on the proposal and the persuasive reality it creates.
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
157
Additional ResourcesAdditional Resources• Office of Proposal Development, TAMU
http://opd.tamu.edu/ • Funding Opportunities
http://opd.tamu.edu/funding-opportunities • Resources for Junior Faculty
http://opd.tamu.edu/resources-for-junior-faculty
• The Craft of Grant Writing workbookhttp://opd.tamu.edu/the-craft-of-writing-workbook
• National Science Foundationhttp://www.nsf.gov/ • Find Funding
http://www.nsf.gov/funding/ • Funded Research
http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
158
Web ResourcesWeb Resources• National Institutes of Health http://www.nih.gov/
• Grant Application Basicshttp://grants.nih.gov/grants/grant_basics.htm
• All About Grants Tutorialhttp://www.niaid.nih.gov/ncn/grants/default.htm
• New Investigator Portalhttp://www.niaid.nih.gov/ncn/grants/new/portal.htm
• Annotated R01 Research Plan and Summary Statementhttp://www.niaid.nih.gov/ncn/grants/app/
• Mock Peer Review Videohttp://www.csr.nih.gov/Video/Video.asp
• CRISP funded biomedical researchhttp://crisp.cit.nih.gov/
28 Oct. 2008 Office of Proposal Development, Texas A&M University
159
Web ResourcesWeb Resources• Grants.gov http://www.grants.gov
• GrantsNet sponsored by AAAS and HHMIhttp://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/funding
• Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programshttp://cdmrp.army.mil/funding/default.htm
• Philanthropy News Digest RFP listingshttp://foundationcenter.org/pnd/rfp/
• American Cancer Society http://www.cancer.org/docroot/RES/RES_0.asp• American Heart Associationhttp://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=9713
• Cancer Research Institute http://www.cancerresearch.org/criprogs.html
• Life Sciences Research Foundation http://www.lsrf.org/geninfo.htm
• National Multiple Sclerosis Society http://www.nationalmssociety.org/