26
The Competitiveness Comparison Between Islamic Banks and Conventional Banks : Case of Indonesian Banking System Presenter: Cupian (G1211025) Supervisor : Dr. Muhammad Abduh Ph.D Colloquium Institute of Islamic Banking and Finance International Islamic University Malaysia November 2 nd -3 rd , 2014

Competitiveness Comparison Islamic and Conventional Banks

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

comparing the competitiveness between Islamic and conventional banks in the case of Indonesian banking system

Citation preview

  • The Competitiveness Comparison Between Islamic Banks and Conventional Banks : Case of Indonesian Banking System

    Presenter: Cupian (G1211025)

    Supervisor : Dr. Muhammad Abduh

    Ph.D Colloquium

    Institute of Islamic Banking and Finance

    International Islamic University Malaysia

    November 2nd-3rd, 2014

  • Outline

    9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    2

    Introduction

    Problem Statement

    Research Objective

    Significance of the Study

    Theoretical Framework

    Methodology

    Expected results/findings

  • 9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    3

    Banking competition has escalated over the past couple decades.Large financial institutions are strategically penetrating new marketsand try to offer a diverse spectrum of products and services tostrengthen their existence and boost their profitability. Among suchdevelopments is the expansion of Islamic banking since seventies,and its growing recognition as a viable mode of financing.

    The recent global financial crisis severely hits the banking system ofseveral countries in the world and forces government to intervene inthe financial sector. All these events can bring a change inconcentration and competition in the banking systems.

    The competitive environment of the banking system in Indonesia hasexperienced several changes in recent decades. The deregulation offinancial services in Indonesia allows banks to freely establishbranches and provide financial services throughout this country.

    INTRODUCTION

  • Problem Statement 9 Ap

    ril 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    4

    The deregulation of financial services in Indonesiaallowing banks to freely establish branches and providefinancial services can bring a change in concentration andcompetition in the banking systems.

    the recent global financial crisis has severely hit theIndonesian banking system forces government tointervene in the financial sector and it could have animpact on the competitiveness of the system

  • Research Objectives 9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    5

    Empirically assessment of the competitive structure of the Indonesia banking system, both Islamic and conventional.

    Investigation on an implication of the deregulation of financial services in Indonesia and the recent global financial crisis on the competitiveness of Indonesian banking system.

  • Research Questions

    9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    6

    Q1:

    What are the competitive structure of the Indonesia banking system both conventional and Islamic over the period 2006-2013?

    What are the impact of input prices of deposit, physical capital and labor on the revenue of Islamic and conventional banks?

    Q2:

  • Research Questions

    9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    7

    What are the impact of total asset and equity ratio on the revenue of Islamic and conventional banks?

    Q3:

    What are the impact of efficiency on performance increases as the market becomes more competitive?

    Q4:

    What are the impact of total asset and equity ratio on the revenue of Islamic and conventional banks?

    Q5:

  • Significance of the study

    9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    8

    the results of this study may help bank managers determine the key success (or failure) factors of Islamic and conventional banks in the competitive market .

    Knowledge gained from the study will provide government with information about how to make a financial policy which can create a competitive market in the banking sector.

  • 9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    9

    Market Structure

    Monopoly

    Oligopoly

    Monopolistic Competition and

    Perfect Competition.

    Dual Banking Sector

    Islamic Banks

    Conventional Banks

    Banking System Stability

    The empirical analysis of the link between competition

    and profitability of the banking system

    Assessment the competitive structure of the

    Indonesia banking system

    the impact of input prices of deposit, physical

    capital and labor on the revenue of Islamic

    and conventional banks

    Financial Deregulation and Financial

    Crisis and Technological advance

    1. H statistic of the Panzar-Rosse model

    2. ordinary least square (OLS) and fixed effects(FE)

    estimators

    The deregulation of financial services in Indonesia, technological

    advancement and the recent global financial crisis on the

    competitiveness of the system.

    the estimation of the Boone indicator pre and post financial

    crisis

    identify a change in the degree of competition

    Market concentration and competition

    1

    2

    34

    Efficiency

    Profitability

    Performance

    Boone indicator

    translog total cost function

    seemingly unrelated regression

    The overall Research Framework

  • Literature Review

    9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    10

    Differences between Islamic and conventional bank

    SCP and ES Theory

    Studies on banking using Panzar Rosse Model

    Studies on banking using Boone Indicator Model

    Studies on banking in Indonesian Banking System

  • 9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    11

    The conventional bank operation is to purchase transactionsdeposits from the depositors at a low interest rate, then allocatethose funds to the households and firms at a higher interest rate,earning an interest spread based on its competitive advantage.Meanwhile, Islamic banking considered as a different bankingstream as it prohibits interest and replaces with a profit share.Moreover, another principle of an Islamic bank is the avoidanceof economic activities involving oppression.

    (Santos ,2000)

    Differences between Islamic and Conventional Bank

  • The structure-conduct-performance (SCP) hypothesis and the efficient-structure (ES) hypothesis 9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    12

    The SCP paradigm assumes that in concentrated markets, banks caneasily arrange collusive agreement and exercise market power.Empirically, a positive relationship between profitability and marketconcentration indicates that the market is less competitive. The EShypothesis on the other hand asserts that the positive relationshipbetween profit and concentration in concentrated markets could resultfrom the banks efficiency gains (cost advantage) contrary to thecollusive behavior. (Demsetz, 1974)

    Under the ES hypothesis the positive statistical relation betweenprofitability and industry concentration could be explained by efficiencygains of banks. Empirical evidences support both hypotheses. Smirlock(1985) finds evidence in favour of the ES hypothesis using U.S. banks.Berger (1995) also finds that the ES hypothesis holds in the U.S.banking system. In contrast, Goddard et al. (2001) find evidence infavour of the SCP paradigm for European banking systems.

  • Authors Countries Periods Results

    Shaffer (1982) New York (USA) monopolistic competition

    Casu and Girardone (2006) European Union countries 1997-2003. monopolistic competition

    Molyneux et al. (1994) EU countries 1986-1989 Banks in France,

    Germany, Spain and the

    UK operate under

    monopolistic competition

    and the monopoly for

    Italy.

    Nathan and Neave (1989) Canada 1982-1984 perfect competition for

    1982 and monopolistic

    competition for 1983 and

    1984

    Vesala (1995) Finland 1985-1992 monopolistic competition

    13

    Studies on banking using Panzar Rosse Model

  • Studies on banking using Boone Indicator Model

    Authors Countries Periods Results

    Leuvensteijn et al.

    (2007)

    France, Germany, Italy,

    the Netherlands, Spain,

    the UK, the U.S. and

    Japan.

    1994-2004 U.S. has the most competitive loan market.

    In the EU, German and Spain were found to have a competitive loan market.

    commercial banks to operate under a more competitive environment than savings banks.

    Tabak et al. (2011) 10 Latin American

    countries banking

    systems

    Schaeck and Cihak

    (2008, 2010)

    European countries and

    rural U.S. banks

    Leuvensteijn et al.

    (2008)

    eight European countries

    14

  • 9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    15

    Authors Periods Method Results

    Gamaginta, Rokhim, (2010) 2004 - 2009 Z-score

    indicator. Using

    the parametric

    statistical t-test,

    The Islamic banks in

    general have a lower

    degree of stability

    compared to

    conventional ones the

    Widyastuti,

    Armanto, (2012)

    2001 - 2006 Panzar and

    Rosse

    The competition in

    banking

    decreased after the

    introduction of API,

    with a large tendency to

    monopoly or collusive

    oligopoly

    Studies on banking in Indonesian Banking System

  • 9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    16

    Scope and Limitation Study

    This study focuses on the Islamic and Conventional banking sector in Indonesia with the observation period of 2006 -2013. The number of commercial banks was 88 commercial banks including 75 conventional banks and 13 Islamic banks which are treated equally as individual bank separated from their holding.

  • 9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    17

    Methodology

    The non-structural approach

    The Panzar-Rosse Model

    Relative Profit Differences (The Boone Indicator)

    Data analysis

    variables

  • 9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    18

    The Panzer-Rosse model

    The method attempts to infer the competitive

    structure of a market by observing the response of a

    banks equilibrium revenues to changes in cost of production.

    The PR approach introduces H-Statistic, which is the sum of the elasticities ofbank revenue function with

    respect to input prices

    The method attempts to infer the competitive structure of a market by observing the response of a banks equilibrium revenues to changes in cost of production. The PR approach introduces H-Statistic, which is the sum of the elasticities ofbank revenue function with respect to input prices

  • 9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    19

    The rejection of the null hypothesis H < 0 rules out

    the monopoly market structure

    the rejection of both H < 0 and H = 1 the (but not

    the H < 1 ) hypothesis indicates monopolistic

    competition.

    the rejection the H < 1 hypothesis, it indicates

    perfect competition.

    This interpretation is valid under the assumption that the

    observations are in the long-run equilibrium (Nathan & Neave,

    1989).

    Empirical Application

  • 9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    20

    In the econometric analysis this paper estimates the H-statistic from the following log-linear reduced-form bank revenue equation for a panel dataset:

  • 9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    21

    Variable Definition

    Total Revenue (TR) Total interest and dividend income plus non-interest operating income.

    Total Cost (TC) Total operating expenses. It includes interest expenses, personnel expenses, and other operating

    expenses.

    Gross Interest Income (GII) *

    )

    Interest income on loans, other interest income, and dividend income.

    Return on Assets (ROA) The ratio of before-tax profit to total assets. It captures all sources of income.

    Price of deposits (W1) Ratio of interest expenses to total deposit and short-term funding (Current accounts, saving accounts,

    time deposits, interbank deposits and alternative funding sources such as securities). It is a proxy for

    the unit price of borrowing funds.

    Price of physical capital (W2) Ratio of depreciation expenses and administrative expenses to total assets. Administrative expenses

    include such as advertisement, security, information technology, and insurance expenses. The

    variable is used as a proxy for the unit price of physical capital.

    Price of labor (W3) Ratio of personnel expenses to total assets. Personnel expenses include wages and salaries, and other

    staff-related expenses. It is used as a proxy for the unit price of labor.

    Marginal cost (MC) It is the cost of producing one more unit of output. It is calculated by estimating a separate cost

    function (7).

    Loans ratio (Z1) Ratio of net loans to total assets. Net loan is calculated as gross loans minus provision for non-

    performing loans. The variable is used to capture risk preference.

    Total assets (Z2) It is the sum of the value of equity and liability. The variable is used to capture possible scale

    economy.

    Equity ratio (Z3) Ratio of equity to total assets. It captures the impact of leverage.

    Output (q) It is the total earning assets. It includes loans, securities, insurance assets and investments in property.

    The variable is used as a proxy for bank level output

    *) For Islamic banks, the category of loans is substituted by financing activities and interest revenues are called financing revenues. Similarly, the interest expense item is labeled financing expenses.

  • 9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    22

    Data Analysis

    The research methodology will be started by collecting the required data from Central Bank of Indonesia database. The data are publicly available in the quartally published Balance Sheet accounts and Income Statements of individual banks. The sample consists of 88 commercial banks including 75 conventional banks and 13 Islamic banks operating in Indonesia and they are treated equally as individual bank separated from their holding.

  • 9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    23

    Collecting Secondary Data

    Data of Islamic Banks and Conventional Banks

    being separated

    Process by Regression Model

    analyzed using the Panzar-Rosse (PR)

    model and

    the Boone indicator model

    Summary

    Procedure

  • References

    9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    24

    Bikker, J.A., Haaf, K. (2002): Measures of competition and concentration in the banking industry: A review of the literature, Economic and Financial

    Modelling9, 53-98.

    Boone, J. (2008): A new way to measure competition,Economic Journal, Vol. 118, 1245-1261.

    Brissimis, S.N., and Delis, M.D. (2011): Bank-level estimates of market power,European Journal of Operational Research, 212, 508517.

    Casu, B., and Girardone, C. (2006): Bank competition, concentration and efficiency in the single European Market, The Manchester Scholl, Vol. 74, 4,

    441-468.

    Leuvensteijn, M., Bikker, J.A., van Rixtel, A. & Kok-Sorensen, C. (2007): A new approach to measuring competition in the loan markets of the euro area,

    Working Paper No. 0768.

  • 9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    25

    Leuvensteijn, M., Bikker, J.A., van Rixtel, A. & Kok-Sorensen, C. (2008): Impact

    of Bank Competition on the Interest Rate pass-Through in The Euro

    Area,Working Paper No. 885.

    Molyneux, P., Lioyd-Willimas, D. M. and Thornton, J. (1994): Market structure

    and performance in Spanish banking,Journalof Banking and Finance, 18, 433-

    44.

    Nathan, A. and Neave, E. (1989): Competition and contestability in Canadas financial system: empirical results, The Canadian Journal of Economics,22,

    576594. Panzar, J. and J. Rosse (1987): Testing for Monopoly Equilibrium, Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 35, 44356. Schaeck, K. and Cihak, M. (2008):How does competition affect efficiency and

    soundness in banking? New empirical evidence, European Central Bank,

    working paper series No. 932.

  • 9 A

    pri

    l 2

    01

    5w

    ww

    .iiu

    m.e

    du

    .my

    26