26
Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratory Debra Sharpe, MPH, CCHO, RBP President and Managing Director

Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Conducting Risk Assessments in

the Public Health Laboratory

Debra Sharpe, MPH, CCHO, RBP

President and Managing Director

Page 2: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Risk Definitions

• “Possibility of loss, injury, disease, or death.”

• “The chance of injury, damage or loss.

– Chance means the probability of something happening.”

• “The probability that exposure to a hazard will lead to • “The probability that exposure to a hazard will lead to a negative consequence.”

Page 3: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Hazard

• Something that is dangerous- an object, a chemical, an infectious agent or a situation.

• Hazards are categorized into three groups:

– PhysicalPhysicalPhysicalPhysical hazards– ChemicalChemicalChemicalChemical hazards– ChemicalChemicalChemicalChemical hazards– BiologicalBiologicalBiologicalBiological hazards

Page 4: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Hazard and Risk

Hazard

• Careless handling of

SHARPS (example,

hypodermic needles)

• Pouring hazardous

Risk

• Needle stick (physical) Infection from exposure (biological)

• Chemical splashing, • Pouring hazardous

chemicals while working on

the open bench

• Overloading electrical

circuits.

• Chemical splashing, possible burn and/or exposure (chemical)

• Damaging equipment, starting a fire (physical)

Page 5: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Risk Assessment

• An action or series of actions taken to recognize or identifyhazards and to measure the risk or probability that something will happen because of risk. In evaluating risk, the severity of the consequences is taken into account.

• The emergent science based on toxicology, epidemiology and statistics that utilizes qualitative and quantitative hazard analysis to provide the public with a reasonable estimate of analysis to provide the public with a reasonable estimate of probability of harm.

• “Not a scalpel, but a crude tool that allows you to make estimates.” Peter Preuss, US EPA

Page 6: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Risk Assessment

• Difficult process (expertise of many fields needed)

• Involves uncertainty

• Range provided (not a specific number)

• Estimates for society (individual risk may vary)• Estimates for society (individual risk may vary)

• “Reasonable worst-case estimate” (better to

overestimate than underestimate risk)

• Costs and benefits of proposed actions helpful

Page 7: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Why Perform a Risk Assessment?

• Keep investigators safe.

• Keep the research community safe.

• Protect the environment

• Effective use of resources.• Effective use of resources.

• Identify training needs.

• Planning (renovations, new construction).

• Regulatory compliance.

• Emergency planning.

Page 8: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Risk assessment timing and scope

• The organization shall ensure the approach to

risk assessment is defined with respect to its

scope, nature and timing so that it is proactive

rather than reactive.rather than reactive.

From the CEN Biorisk Management Standard

CWA 15793

8

Page 9: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Risk assessment timing and scope

• The following should trigger either a new risk assessment or review of an existing one:

– commencement of new work or changes to the programme of work including the introduction of new biological agents or alterations to work flow or volume;biological agents or alterations to work flow or volume;

– new construction / modifications to laboratories, plant and equipment or its operation;

– introduction of altered and unplanned staffing arrangements (including contractors, visitors and other non-core personnel);

9

From the CEN Biorisk Management Standard

CWA 15793

Page 10: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

When

• Significant alterations to Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) or working practices (e.g. disinfection / waste management methodologies, PPE provision / usage entry / exit protocols, etc.);

• When unexpected events that may have relevance for the management of biorisks are observed;management of biorisks are observed;

• When actual or potential non-conformity with internal / external rules and regulations is identified (e.g. introduction of new legislation or major accident exposure);

10

Page 11: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

When

• When considering emergency response and

contingency planning requirements;

• As part of the existing management system review • As part of the existing management system review

process (e.g. annually or at another appropriate and

predetermined frequency)

From the CEN Biorisk Management Standard

CWA 15793

11

Page 12: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

When

• Regular intervals-annually

• Whenever a change in research program occurs

– Move or renovation– New employee

New pathogen or reagent– New pathogen or reagent– New equipment– New technique or procedure.

Page 13: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

4 Steps in Risk Assessment

1. Identify health hazard

2. Quantify hazard

3. Exposure assessment (from source to at risk

person)person)

4. Determine probability of disease (based on

exposure estimate and potency of agent)

Page 14: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Describe work activities

Identify Hazards

Determine Risks

Decide if risk

is acceptable If Yes

Proceed with

work and

monitor

14

monitor

controls

Prepare risk control

action plan

Implement control

measures

Review adequacy of plan

If No

Revise or

close

project

Page 15: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Biohazard Risk Assessment

• Qualitative exercise (inexact)

• General guidelines to assess/control risk:

– agent in use, volumes, concentration– proposed practices/procedures– proposed practices/procedures– proposed location– training, experience, health status of worker

Page 16: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Hierarchy of Controls

• Anticipation of hazard

• Recognition of hazard

• Evaluation of hazard

• Control of hazardControl of hazard

– Substitution (surrogate organisms?)– Administrative (access control , information

dissemination, communication)– Engineering controls– Work practices– Personal protective clothing/equipment

Page 17: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Biohazard Risk Assessment

• Use to determine appropriate combination of containment

– lab practices– safety equipment– facility design

• Primary Containment

– protects handlers and those in immediate vicinity– protects handlers and those in immediate vicinity• Secondary Containment

– protects environment and those outside the lab

Page 18: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Biohazard Risk Assessment Pathway

• Principal Investigator (initiates risk review)

• Biosafety Officer (assists PI)

• Institutional Biosafety Committee (assists PI, reviews/approve

PI’s protocol submission)

• Assistance through• Assistance through

– published listings, guidelines (U.S. and abroad)– other experts at host institution, local public health– other institutions working with same agents– Government entities

Page 19: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Biohazard Risk Assessment & Risk Management

• Pathogen

– Infectious agent (viruses, bacteria, fungi, parasites)• Procedures (Protocol)

• Personnel

– Education– Education– Training– Experience

Page 20: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Biohazard Risk Assessment & Risk Management

• Engineering Controls

• Personal Protective Equipment

• Location

– Proposed lab or animal facility– Proposed lab or animal facility

Page 21: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Pathogen

• Quantity/Concentration

• Incidence in the Community

• Immunization/Treatment

• Communicability• Communicability

• Presence of Vectors

• Environmental Stability

• Data from animal experiments

• Clinical specimens

Page 22: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Pathogen

• Agent Risk Group Classification (CDC)

– Based upon microbiology and prior history of lab acquired infections

– See ABSA Risk Group website• Source of agent• Source of agent

• Routes of Exposure

• Infectious Dose (LD50’s for toxins)

Page 23: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Pathogen

• Pathogenicity

• Virulence

• Antibiotic resistance

• Mode of transmission and host range

• Availability of effective preventive measures (e.g.,

vaccines)

• Availability of effective treatment (e.g., antibiotics)

Page 24: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Risk Group Classifications

• Risk Group 1 (RG1); Managed at Biosafety Level 1 (BSL1)– Agents are not associated with disease in healthy adult

humans e.g. E. coli K12 strains, B. subtilis, S. cerevisiae

• Risk Group 2 (RG2); Managed at Biosafety Level 2 • Risk Group 2 (RG2); Managed at Biosafety Level 2 (BSL2)– Agents are associated with human disease of varying severity

(rarely serious) and for which preventative or therapeutic interventions are often available. e.g. Salmonella, Shigella, Vibrio, Plasmodium, Hepatitis B

Virus, Cryptococcus neoformans, E. coli 0157:H7

Page 25: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Risk Group Classifications

• Risk Group 3 (RG3);

– Managed at Biosafety Level 3 (BSL3)– Agents are associated with serious or lethal

human disease for which preventative or human disease for which preventative or therapeutic interventions may be available (high individual risk, low community risk).

e.g. Anthrax (Ames Strain)

Page 26: Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public Health Laboratoryadph.org/bcl/assets/ConductingARiskAssessmentinthePHLab.pdf · 2015-11-30 · Conducting Risk Assessments in the Public

Risk Group Classifications

• Risk Group 4 (RG4);

– Managed at Biosafety Level 4 (BSL4)– Agents are likely to cause serious or lethal human

disease for which preventative or therapeutic interventions are not usually available (high disease for which preventative or therapeutic interventions are not usually available (high individual risk and high community risk).

e.g. Ebola, Cercopithecine herpesvirus 1 (Herpes B or Monkey B virus)