Upload
vuongtram
View
225
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Containment Chemistry Modeling
M. Salay
D.A. Powers
R.Y. Lee
Overview and Status
European Review Meeting On Severe Accident Research (ERMSAR) 2015
Objectives and Motivations
• Revise and refine MELCOR containment
chemistry model to ‘scale’ findings from
Phébus-FP on iodine chemistry to reactors:
– Old model hastily constructed for ISP dealing with Canadian RTF tests
– Change in paradigm by Phébus-FP
• Raw water issue
2
Old Paradigm
3
Mitigation easy under old paradigm
4
Phébus-FP Tests Included a Sump
• Iodine did not behave as expected
– Iodine concentration fell to a steady state level
– Steady state persisted for ~90 hours
• ‘steady-state’ gaseous iodine concentration persisted despite changes in sump pH and temperature
5
Aerosol Phase Chemistry
Phase
Degradation phase
Washin
g p
hase
6
Evaporating Sump
Condensing Sump
7
New Paradigm for Iodine
• Iodine chemistry in containment still object of research – Basic iodine chemistry understood – Interactions with other materials in
reactor is the problem
• New paradigm focuses on interactions of iodine with painted surfaces in containment – Iodine binds to paint, evolves under
irradiation – Evolved gaseous iodine oxidizes to IOx
particles – Particles deposit back on the paint
8
New Paradigm Derived from
PHÉBUS-FP Results
9
‘Scaling’ the Phébus-FP Results
• Geometry and mass transport – ‘steady-state’ gaseous iodine chemistry
depends on balance of gaseous iodine sources and sinks
• These will differ in reactors from those in tests
– Iodine release possible depends on iodine that reaches painted surfaces versus pools
• Released iodine has less access to sumps in reactors
• Chemical simplicity – Final model intended for system code
10
Elements of the Modeling • Primary objective still
understanding ‘gaseous’ iodine under DBA and beyond design basis accidents
• Elements – Gas phase chemistry – Aqueous phase chemistry – Heterogeneous chemistry
• Gas <->Liquid • Gas <-> Solid • Both <-> Surfaces
Surfaces
Gas Phase Modeling
Aqueous Modeling
Heterogeneous Modeling
11
‘Raw’ water issue
• Fukushima accident management activities reminded us that US plants will use raw water as a coolant of last resort – Seawater – Lakes and ponds – Rivers
• Water recirculated from sumps to RCS which may be pressurized – Higher water temp and pressure than considered in past – Sump screen blockage
• Corrosion during plant recovery – Mild steel of vessel and containment liner – Clad and exposed fuel
12
Other materials
• Many solutes may be present: – Core degradation products
– Degradation of organic materials in containment
– Raw water
• Solutes: Borate, hydrazine, phosphate, calcium, zinc, aluminum, iron, uranium, and organic species
• Solutes in raw water include: Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+, K+, Sr2+, Cl-, SO4
2-, Br-, F-, HCO3-, B(OH)3, and biota
13
Strategy
• More chemistry possible than tolerable in a
systems level accident progression code like MELCOR
• Many technical issues still being resolved
– Fukushima information may be crucial
• Strategy
– Standalone code developed
– Use to define important chemistry to carry into
MELCOR
14
Gas Phase Modeling • Thermal and radiolytic conversion of gaseous
iodine into iodine oxide particles I2(gas) or CH3I + O3 or OHo I2O4 or I2O5
• Reactions taken from JPL and Mätzing (~2000)
• Solved using the quasi-steady state method in connection with aqueous radiolysis
• Sump acidification by formation of HNO3
• Boundary condition for gas solubility in aqueous phases H2, O2, CO2, CO, O3, H2O2, organic vapors
15
Liquid Phase Modeling
• Primary objective is to treat the partitioning of iodine from aqueous phase to gas phase – Thermal: 2I- + O2(aq) + H2O → I2(aq) + 2OH- – Radiolytic: I- + OHo ↔ HOI- → OH- + Io Io + I- → I2
- 2I2- ↔I3
- + I- I3
- ↔ I2(aq) + I- I2(aq) ↔ I2(gas) – Formation of volatile organic iodides: CH3I
• Additional objectives – Corrosion – Precipitation
16
Aqueous Modeling Approach
• Thermochemical treatment for most non-radionuclides
• Kinetic approach where necessary – Mass transport to and from surface – Radiolysis – Leaching
• Non-ideal behavior – Calculate activity coefficients using electrolyte-
specific, non-electrolyte-specific, and seawater-specific models
– Validate against existing data
17
Radiolysis • Yields for α, β, γ, and no
– Function of T, pH
• Quasi-steady state solution method
– Avoid solving very large number of very stiff differential equations – Will not handle abrupt (~minutes) transients – H2(aq), O2(aq), H+ constant in time step – Depletions accumulated and fed to equilibrium calculation
• Account for ionic strength on rates of reaction – Generally, ionic specie activities decrease in electrolytes – Generally, neutral specie activities increase in electrolytes
• Six reaction sets considered for water radiolysis: LIRIC; INSPECT; Ershov & Gordeev; Palfi, Wojnáfovits & Takács; Sunaryo & Domae; and RISØ
• Include radiochemical reactions of other solutes: Chloride, Carbon monoxide & Carbon dioxide, Hydrazine, Iodine, Silver, Organic species
18
Additional aqueous modeling
• Iodine Reaction schemes: LIRIC, INSPECT, AIMS, IODE, PSI
• Precipitation – Lots of solids can precipitate, e.g: AgI,
AgCl,Al(OH)3, Fe(OH)3,CaCO3, CaSO4.nH2O,calcium phosphate, borate
• Difficult to predict – Solid solutions especially challenging
– Currently just ‘flag’ when solubility product exceeded for a small list of the many possible solids
19
Thermochemical Modeling Challenges
• Adopt key species potential approach to the minimization of Gibbs Free Energy – Allows extensive speciation
• Extend data and properties to ~550 K and P ~150 bar – Water properties from IAWPS Industrial Formulation
2007 • Augment with additional parameters relevant to SA
modeling: viscosity, Kw, self diffusion etc.
– Modified HKF method to calc. properties
• Activity coefficients of solutes at ionic strengths at least up to 1 molal
20
Heterogeneous Modeling
• Gas exchange between liquid and atmosphere
• Ion absorption on precipitates
• Degradation of paint and cables
• Corrosion
• Precipitation
• Aerosol formation (IOx)
21
Mass Transport at the Liquid-Gas Interface
• Gas-water exchange essential aspect of modeling – Iodine partitioning from aqueous phase to atmosphere – Acidification by radiolytic HNO3 and HCl from cables – Oxygen and hydrogen concentration in water
• Water present in a variety of configurations – Droplets – Falling films – Spills – Water pools
• Updating from two-film model to surface renewal and surface penetration modeling – Can include effects of chemical reactions
22
Remaining Heterogeneous Issues • Liquid diffusion of reactive species
– I2(aq) + H2O ↔ HOI + I- + H+ – Diffusion of neutral influenced by ion diffusion – Treat now only as single solute
• Multi-component diffusion in gas phase boundary layer – Evaporating and condensing steam couples to fluxes of
other dissolving gases
• Uptake coefficients – Receives much attention in oceanography literature
• Solute enrichment at still liquid surface – Not considered
23
Simple Corrosion Scheme
• Short term corrosion
– Nucleation and growth of ferrous hydroxide
– Influence of other solutes
• Different types of “green rust”
• Longer term corrosion
– Anaerobic corrosion
– Attributed to bacteria
24
Degradation of Organic Materials in Containment
• Aqueous organic species poorly understood – Can affect radiolytic reaction schemes – Can react to form volatile organic iodides
• Organic vapors can be produced by – Pyrolysis during energetic accident phases – Continued radiolysis – Synergism between the effects of temperature and radiation
observed in cable insulation
• Focus on two sources of organic vapors – Cable insulation – Paint – Biota not considered
25
Problem of Including Organics in Model
• There are a lot of possible organic species – Aliphatic: CH4 – Ketones: methyl ethyl ketone, acetone – Alcohols: methanol – Aromatics: benzene – Chlorinated species: vinyl chloride
• Radiolysis over the long term leads to even more: CH4 + OH → CH3 + H2O 2CH3 → C2H6 C2H6 + OH → C2H5 + H2O etc.
• Currently anticipate including limited organics in model – Where to stop? (Chose Ethyl)
26
Status and Information Needs • Individual models developed for all elements • Need to combine models • Remaining information needs
– Effect of paint aging – Competition with other species
• Cl2 and HCl are likely competitors – Any other potential competitors for iodine adsorption?
• Cl/I ratio expected ~ 100 – For similar surface affinities expect 100/1 Cl to I on surface
• Need to ensure that our conclusions on iodine would not be completely altered by competition
– Understand features about paint that affect • Iodine adsorption • Organic iodide production
27