46
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT AND PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY TEXAS STYLE: A QUALITY MODEL FOR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT Anson Green Carrie Tupa Lori Slayton Adult Education and Literacy Texas Workforce Commission

CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT AND PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT AND PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY TEXAS

STYLE: A QUALITY MODEL FOR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

Anson Green

Carrie Tupa

Lori Slayton

Adult Education and Literacy

Texas Workforce Commission

BEFORE YOU CAN IMPROVE… WHAT DOES GOOD LOOK LIKE?

THE TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION

• Title I Adult and Dislocated Worker

and Youth Programs

• Title II Adult Education and Literacy

• Title III Wagner-Peyser

• Title IV Vocational Rehabilitation

Services (September 1)

TRANSITION OF THE ADULT EDUCATION AND LITERACY PROGRAM – SUNSET COMMISSION FINDINGS

“Making the TWC responsible for adult education would better position the State to effectively ensure that adult Texans have the basic skills necessary to succeed in the workplace.” pg. 26

Alignments would support needs of shared customers

Better support performance for shared customers

Facilitate more seamless customer services

Reduce challenges associated with sharing test data and other student information

SENATE BILL 307

SB 307

(2) …develop the mechanism and guidelines for the coordination of comprehensive adult education and related skill training services for adults with other entities…

HISTORICAL LENS…

•Priorities were EFL gains, high school equivalency obtainment

•Secondary priorities were transitions to postsecondary/employment

•Workforce integration represented through special projects/initiatives

BIG STATE, BIG GOALS

From the draft Adult Education and Literacy strategic plan

TWC Adult Education will have 20,000 students enrolled in career pathways programs by the year

2020.

Under this goal, career pathways programs include:

Integrated education and training

Workplace literacy

Skills for internationally trained professionals

WHAT IS OUR ACCOUNTABILITY STRUCTURE UNDER WIOA?

•Focus on skill gains that lead to something

•Increased currency on transitions to postsecondary education and training and employment

These things take time to show in the data!

THE TEXAS AEL ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM TWC Program

Support Specialists

TRAIN Tex PD System

TWC Division of Operational

Insight

Texas Educating Adults

Management System (TEAMS)

TWC Sub-recipient Monitoring

TWC Board and Special Initiatives

Contracts

THE TEXAS AEL ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM TWC Program

Support Specialists

TRAIN Tex PD System

TWC Division of Operational

Insight

Texas Educating Adults

Management System (TEAMS)

TWC Sub-recipient Monitoring

TWC Board and Special Initiatives

Contracts

1) Oversight

2) Guidance

3) Vision

Oversight

Ongoing/

”Just-in-Time”

• Program data-entry into TEAMS

• TEAMS data corrections/ error checking

Weekly/ Bi-weekly

• General “status” check of all program health

Monthly

• Local programs validate data

• Program Management Reports

• Inter-departmental meeting -Monthly Performance Report (MPR)

Yearly

• Desk reviews

• On-sight reviews

• Target setting

• Performance funding allocations

Multi-year/Long-term

• Contract terms in rule

• Competitive procurement

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT REPORTS

TEXAS EDUCATING ADULTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (TEAMS)

THERE

I FIXED IT

THERE

I FIXED IT

CANNED REPORTS IN TEAMS (54) Average Daily Attendance Non Validated Classes

GED Count with Educational

Functioning Level

Curriculum by Grant

Recipient, Sites,

Participants and Teachers

(DL)

Table X: Outcomes for

Adults in Correctional

Education Programs

Table IVC: Educational

Gains and Attendance for

Participants in Distance

Education

Classes with Functioning

Level Participant Achievements of

Follow-up Measures Participant Address List

Participants by Educational

Functioning Level and

Contact Hour Range (DL)

Table XI: Secondary

Outcome Measures (Self

Reported Data)

Table V: Core Follow-up

Outcome Achievement

Participant Contact Hours

By School District (LEA) and

Funding Source

Participant Count and

Hours By Education Level Participant Address Mailing

Labels Site and Provider Address

Mailing Labels

Table XI - Part 2 -

Achievements of Program

Participants (Self Reported

Data)

Table VA: Core Follow-up

Outcome Achievement for

Participants in Distance

Education

Data Sign Off Status Participant Count and

Hours By Separation

Reason

Participant Count and

Hours By Site Staff Address List

Table XIII: Core Follow-up

Outcome Achievement for

Prior Reporting Year and

for Unintended Outcomes

Table VI: Participant Status

and Program Enrollment

Participants by Contact

Hour Range and Level

Completion (DL)

Participant Counts By

Ethnicity and Gender Participant Roster

Staff Address Mailing

Labels Table XIV: Local Grantees

by Funding Source

Table VII: Adult Education

Personnel by Function and

Job Status

Performance Report Participant Count and

Hours By Funding Source,

Site and Class

Participants Tested with

Less Than Minimum Hours of

Instruction

Staff Count By Employment

Status Table II: Participants by

Ethnicity, Gender, and Age Participants Funded By

TANF

Individual Waiting List Staff and Participants

Count by Grant Recipient Participant Roster With

Latest Assessments

Adult Education Staff

Development Report (In-

Service & Pre-Service)

Table III: Participants by

Age and Functioning Level TANF - Welfare to Work

Initiatives in Texas

Organization Waiting List Participants Enrolled and

Level Completed with

Proxy Hours

Participants with Less than

12 Contact Hours Staff Roster Main

Table IV: Educational Gains

and Attendance by

Educational Functioning

Level

GED Participant Matches Participant Gains

Educational Gains and

Attendance for Pre- and

Posttested Participants

(Table IV and IVB

Combined)

Staff Without

Qualifications

Table IVA: Educational

Gains and Attendance by

Educational Functioning

Level, with Completion

Breakdown

GED Practice Test Participants Achieved GED

by Age and Functioning

Level

Participants with Proxy

Hours

Table I: Participants by

Ethnicity, Gender, and

Educational Functioning

Level

Table IVB: Educational

Gains and Attendance for

Pre- and Posttested

Participants

PROGRAM STATUS SHEET (PROGRAM REPORT CARD)

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT MEETING

Finance Provides financial analysis and alerts of issues

Adult Ed Program

Staff

Workforce Programs

Division Director

Provides agency leadership

perspective

Division of Operational

Insight

Contracts Provides contractual/ compliance lens

Provides the “detail lens”/ program

perspective

Provides the data

Guidance

Ongoing/

”Just-in-Time”

• AEL Letters

• Technical assistance bulletins

• Webinars

• OCTAE Guidance

Weekly/ Bi-weekly

• All-grantee conference call

Monthly

• Program management reports

Yearly

• Business meetings (2-3 per year)

• Symposiums

• TWC Annual Conference

Multi-year/Long-term

• Strategic Plan

PROGRAM STATUS SHEETS

•Easy to see at-a-glance what the expectation is

•Help diagnose weaknesses

EFL GAIN ANALYSIS

Summary

DOS 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total

Language 0 0 0 2 0 1 3

Reading 0 0 2 1 1 1 5

Math 0 0 4 8 1 1 14

Oral 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Literacy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Listening 15 2 0 0 0 0 17

Reading 8 2 0 0 0 0 10

Writing 66 43 15 0 0 0 124

Speaking 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

AB

E/

AS

E

ABE/ASE Levels ESL Levels

BEST/BEST Plus

TABE CLAS-E

ES

L

EFL GAIN ANALYSIS

Summary

DOS 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total

Language 0 0 0 2 0 1 3

Reading 0 0 2 1 1 1 5

Math 0 0 4 8 1 1 14

Oral 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Literacy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Listening 15 2 0 0 0 0 17

Reading 8 2 0 0 0 0 10

Writing 66 43 15 0 0 0 124

Speaking 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

AB

E/

AS

E

ABE/ASE Levels ESL Levels

BEST/BEST Plus

TABE CLAS-E

ES

L

Summary

DOS 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total

Language 0 0 0 2 0 1 3

Reading 0 0 2 1 1 1 5

Math 0 0 4 8 1 1 14

Oral 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Literacy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Listening 15 2 0 0 0 0 17

Reading 8 2 0 0 0 0 10

Writing 66 43 15 0 0 0 124

Speaking 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

AB

E/

AS

EABE/ASE Levels ESL Levels

BEST/BEST Plus

TABE CLAS-E

ES

L

EFL GAIN ANALYSIS

Summary

DOS 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total

Language 0 0 0 2 0 1 3

Reading 0 0 2 1 1 1 5

Math 0 0 4 8 1 1 14

Oral 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Literacy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Listening 15 2 0 0 0 0 17

Reading 8 2 0 0 0 0 10

Writing 66 43 15 0 0 0 124

Speaking 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

AB

E/

AS

E

ABE/ASE Levels ESL Levels

BEST/BEST Plus

TABE CLAS-E

ES

L

Summary

DOS 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total

Language 0 0 0 2 0 1 3

Reading 0 0 2 1 1 1 5

Math 0 0 4 8 1 1 14

Oral 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Literacy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Listening 15 2 0 0 0 0 17

Reading 8 2 0 0 0 0 10

Writing 66 43 15 0 0 0 124

Speaking 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

AB

E/

AS

EABE/ASE Levels ESL Levels

BEST/BEST Plus

TABE CLAS-E

ES

L

Requires more analysis:

Is this issue systemic, or is it

targeted to an individual

instructor?

Program Specialist

TRAIN Tex

PD Specialist

Vision

Ongoing/

”Just-in-Time”

• AEL Letters

• Technical assistance bulletins

• Webinars

• OCTAE Guidance

Weekly/ Bi-weekly

• All-grantee conference call

Monthly

• Program management reports

Yearly

• Business meetings (2-3 per year)

• Symposiums

• TWC Annual Conference

Multi-year/Long-term

• Strategic Plan

• AEL provider performance workgroup

“A vision was never

accomplished simply through

requirements.”

Johan Uvin

Department of Education

TWC’S DIVISION OF OPERATIONAL INSIGHT

• Does agency-wide performance and accountability, including target development and negotiations

TWC’S DIVISION OF OPERATIONAL INSIGHT

• Does agency-wide performance and accountability, including target development and negotiations

TWC’S DIVISION OF OPERATIONAL INSIGHT

• Does agency-wide performance and accountability, including target development and negotiations

• Un-biased (believe us!)

• Understands what’s happening at the federal level

• Participates in federal workgroups for all agencies

WHEN THINGS GO…

THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PLAN PROCESS

Sub-recipient

monitoring

reports

Performance

reports/timely

data entry

Fiscal reports

Objective

Criteria

+

What is the risk

to the agency

or public?

Technical

Assistance Plan

Issued

THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PLAN

THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PLAN

Based on a set of clear issues

Examples: Failure to enter data on-time

Did not meet enrollment target

THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PLAN

Contains a set of clear benchmarks

Issue Benchmark

Failure to enter data on-

time

Complete six consecutive

monthly data validations

on-time with less than 5%

error rate (requiring

invalidation)

Did not meet enrollment

target

Meet four consecutive

months of meeting monthly

enrollment benchmark

THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PLAN

• Contains mutually agreed upon strategies to meet benchmarks

Issue Benchmark Strategies

Failure to enter data

on-time

Complete six

consecutive monthly

data validations on-

time with less than 5%

error rate (requiring

invalidation)

• Create standard

operating

procedure for data-

entry – DUE DATE

• Re-train data-entry

staff within 2

months

BEYOND THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PLAN

Technical Assistance

Plan

Corrective Action Plan

Intent to sanction

Sanctions

BEYOND THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PLAN

Technical Assistance

Plan

Corrective Action Plan

Intent to sanction

Sanctions

Getting here typically indicates a very severe systemic issue

Professional Development

Center

Texas A & M University

Career Pathways Expansion

Houston Community College

Public Library AEL

Expansion

Texas State Library and Archives Commission

Assessment and Standards Initiative

Texas State University

Focus on the Basics Reading and Math

Institutes Region 6

Distance Learning

Mentor Initiative

College of the

Mainland

Northside ISD

PD and Program Integration Efforts with Non-Profits

Literacy Texas

OneStar

Foundation

Adult Education and Literacy Grantees

Texas Workforce Commission

TRAIN TEX TRAINING, RESOURCE AND INNOVATION NETWORK FOR TEXAS

WHAT WORKS FOR TEXAS?

Vision

Ongoing/

”Just-in-Time”

• AEL Letters

• Technical assistance bulletins

• Webinars

• OCTAE Guidance

Weekly/ Bi-weekly

• All-grantee conference call

Monthly

• Program management reports

Yearly

• Business meetings (2-3 per year)

• Symposiums

• TWC Annual Conference

Multi-year/Long-term

• Strategic Plan

• AEL provider performance workgroup

Big/innovative performance idea

from TWC

Performance workgroup

determines: Will this work?

Big/innovative performance idea

from TWC

Performance workgroup determines:

Will this work?

TWC “tries it out”

QUESTIONS?

Anson Green

Director

[email protected]

Carrie Tupa

Strategic Planning and Accountability Coordinator

[email protected]

Lori Slayton

Program Specialist, Professional Development & Special Projects

[email protected]