Corneal Inflammation After Penetrating Keratoplasty and

Miniature Keratoprosthesis Implantation

Alja Crnej, Masahiro Omoto, Thomas H. Dohlman, Claes H. Dohlman, and Reza Dana

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

No financial interests to disclose.This work was supported by the Boston-KPro research fund and the National Institute of Health (grant R01-EY 12963).

Background

Boston Keratoprosthesis (B-KPro), an artificial cornea, is well-established alternative to re-grafting and high-risk transplantation.Glaucoma, other optic neuropathies, epiretinal membrane, macular edema, and retinal detachment are still threats to good long-term visual outcomes after B-KPro surgery and it has been hypothesized that chronic postoperative corneal inflammation may be a contributing factor to these complications.

Boston Keratoprosthesis

We have established a novel murine model of KPro implantation(m-KPro) for evaluating host responses after KPro surgery.

Background

Design and dimensions of the m-KPro. A mouse with implanted m-KPro.

Purpose

To compare corneal inflammation after:

1) Syngeneic* PK**2) Allogeneic PK 3) Syngeneic m-KPro*** implantation4) Allogeneic m-KPro implantation

in mice.

*Syngeneic = autograft**PK = penetrating keratoplasty***m-KPro = miniature Keratoprosthesis

Methods

BALB/C (syngeneic) or C57BL/6 (allogeneic) corneas were transplanted onto BALB/C host beds as part of PK or m-KPro implantation. Corneal inflammation was assessed by determining the frequencies of CD45+ leukocytes, CD4+ T cells, CD11b+ cells, and Gr-1+ granulocytes/monocytes by flow cytometry at 2, 4, and 8 weeks post-transplantation. In addition, expression levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) were analyzed using Real-Time qPCR at 8 weeks post-transplantation.

ResultsQuantification Of Graft-infiltrating Immune Cells

B) CD4+

CD45+

CD11b+

CD4+

Gr1+

N – naïve SP – syngeneic PK SK – syngeneic m-KPro AP – allogeneic PK AK – allogeneic m-KPro

Corneal grafts plus host corneal beds were collected and analyzed for the presence of CD45+, CD4+, CD11b+ and Gr1+ cells using flow cytometry. n=3 eyes/group; ***p<0.001, **p<0.005, *p<0.05. Data from one experiment of two is shown.

ResultsQuantification Of Pro-inflammatory

Cytokines In The Graft

N – naïve SP – syngeneic PK SK – syngeneic m-KPro AP – allogeneic PK AK – allogeneic m-KPro

Corneal grafts plus host corneal beds were collected 8 weeks after the procedure and analyzed for the expression of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-1β by Real-Time qPCR. *p<0.01. Data from one representative experiment of two is shown.

TNFα IL-1β

Conclusion

Although the m-KPro device results in the inflammatory response in the cornea, allogenicity (of the carrier tissue) is alsoa significant contributor to inflammation.

This suggests using the patient’s own cornea as a carrier for the B-KPro, if possible. When an autograft carrier is not an option, - methods to reduce the allogenicity (such as decellularization), or- usage of inhibitors of inflammatory cytokines, should be considered.

References

• Ciolino JB, Belin MW, Todani A, Al-Arfaj K, Rudnisky CJ. Retention of the Boston keratoprosthesis type 1: multicenter study results. Ophthalmology 2013;120:1195-1200

• Mori Y, Nejima R, Minami K, Miyata K, Kamiya K, Fukud M. [Long-term outcomes of Boston keratoprosthesis]. Nihon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2013;117:35-43.• Aldave AJ, Sangwan VS, Basu S, et al. International results with the Boston type I keratoprosthesis. Ophthalmology 2012;119:1530-1538.• Srikumaran D, Munoz B, Aldave AJ, et al. Long-term Outcomes of Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Implantation: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort.

Ophthalmology 2014.• Cruzat A, Shukla A, Dohlman CH, Colby K. Wound anatomy after type 1 Boston KPro using oversized back plates. Cornea 2013;32:1531-1536.• Kamyar R, Weizer JS, de Paula FH, et al. Glaucoma associated with Boston type I keratoprosthesis. Cornea 2012;31:134-139.• Goldman DR, Hubschman JP, Aldave AJ, et al. Postoperative posterior segment complications in eyes treated with the Boston type I keratoprosthesis.

Retina 2013;33:532-541.• Oh JY, Lee HJ, Ko AY, Ko JH, Kim MK, Wee WR. Analysis of macrophage phenotype in rejected corneal allografts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54:7779-

7784.• King WJ, Comer RM, Hudde T, Larkin DF, George AJ. Cytokine and chemokine expression kinetics after corneal transplantation. Transplantation

2000;70:1225-1233.• Lee HJ, Ko JH, Ko AY, Kim MK, Wee WR, Oh JY. Intravenous Infusion of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Decreased CCR7(+) Antigen Presenting Cells in

Mice with Corneal Allotransplantation. Curr Eye Res 2014;39:780-789.• Crnej A, Omoto M, Dohlman TH, et al. A novel murine model for keratoprosthesis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:3681-3685.• Crnej A, Paschalis EI, Salvador-Culla B, et al. Glaucoma progression and role of glaucoma surgery in patients with Boston keratoprosthesis. Cornea

2014;33:349-354.• Cade F, Paschalis EI, Regatieri CV, Vavvas DG, Dana R, Dohlman CH. Alkali burn to the eye: protection using TNF-alpha inhibition. Cornea 2014;33:382-389.• Stevenson W, Cheng SF, Emami-Naeini P, et al. Gamma-irradiation reduces the allogenicity of donor corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:7151-

7158.• Messmer EM, Meyer P, Herwig MC, et al. Morphological and immunohistochemical changes after corneal cross-linking. Cornea 2013;32:111-117.• Mencucci R, Marini M, Paladini I, et al. Effects of riboflavin/UVA corneal cross-linking on keratocytes and collagen fibres in human cornea. Clin Experiment

Ophthalmol 2010;38:49-56.• Arafat SN, Robert MC, Shukla AN, Dohlman CH, Chodosh J, Ciolino JB. UV cross-linking of donor corneas confers resistance to keratolysis. Cornea

2014;33:955-959.