CORPORATION OF THE . TOWN OF GEORGINA . COUNCIL AGENDA . Wednesday, April 4, 2018 . 9:00 AM . 1. CALL TO ORDER - MOMENT OF MEDITATION “We would like to begin today’s meeti

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA

COUNCIL AGENDA

Wednesday, April 4, 2018

9:00 AM

1. CALL TO ORDER - MOMENT OF MEDITATION

“We would like to begin today’s meeting by acknowledging that the Town of Georgina is located over lands originally used and occupied by the First Peoples of the Williams Treaties First Nations and other Indigenous Peoples and thank them for sharing this land. “We would also like to acknowledge the Chippewas of Georgina Island First Nation as our close neighbour and friend, one with which we strive to build a cooperative and respectful relationship.”

2. ROLL CALL

3. COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS

(1) Georgina 200 Celebration ‘Did You Know’

4. INTRODUCTION OF ADDENDUM ITEM(S)

5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA

6. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND GENERAL NATURE THEREOF

7. ADOPTION OF MINUTES

Pages 1-26 (1) Minutes of the Council Budget Meeting held on January 23 and 24, 2018.

Pages 27-34 (2) Minutes of the Special Council Meeting held on March 22, 2018.

8. SPEAKERS

9. DELEGATIONS/PETITIONS None.

10. PRESENTATIONS None.

11. PUBLIC MEETINGS

(1) STATUTORY MEETING(S) UNDER THE PLANNING ACT OR MEETINGS

PERTAINING TO THE CONTINUATION OF PLANNING MATTERS

April 4, 2018 A 2 2018-04-04

Pages 35-87 (9:30 a.m.) (A) Application to Amend Zoning By-law No. 500

JRAD INVESMENTS INC. Part Lot 7, Concession 3 (NG), Parts 62 & 65, Plan 65R-31761; s/w Dovedale Drive and Woodbine Avenue AGENT: MacAulay Shiomi Howson Ltd. c/o Chris Stoyanovich

Report No. DS-2018-0044

Recommendation(s): 1. That Council receive Report DS-2018-0044 prepared by the Planning

Division, Development Services Department dated April 4, 2018 respecting an application to amend Zoning By-law 500 submitted by JRAD Investments Inc. for Iands located at the southwest corner of Dovedale Drive and Woodbine Avenue in Keswick.

2. That Council approve the application to amend Zoning By-law 500

submitted by JRAD Investments Inc. for the lands located at the southwest corner of Dovedale Drive and Woodbine Avenue in Keswick described as Parts 62 and 65 Plan 65R-31761

3. That Council adopt a By-law to amend Zoning By-law No. 500 and that the

By-law contain the site-specific provisions outlined in Report DS-2018-0044.

4. That pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990 C.P.13, as

amended, in the event minor revisions are necessary respecting the proposed amending Zoning By-law, further notice shall not be required.

(Advisement: Last before Council on December 13, 2017)

(2) STATUTORY MEETING(S) UNDER OTHER LEGISLATION None. (3) OTHER PUBLIC MEETINGS None.

12. REPORTS

(1) ADOPTION OF REPORTS NOT REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION (2) REPORTS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION

Reports from the Recreation and Culture Department:

Pages 88-90 (A) Chamber of Commerce Loan Guarantor Request

Report No. RC-2018-0008

April 4, 2018 A 3 2018-04-04

Recommendation(s): 1. That Council receive Report No. RC-2018-0008 prepared by the

Cultural Services Division, Recreation and Culture Department, dated April 4, 2018, respecting the Chamber of Commerce Loan Guarantor Request.

2. That Council approve the Town to be the loan guarantor for $8,000 in

addition to the previously approved $60,000 to the Chamber of Commerce in favour of South Lake Community Futures Development Corporation.

Pages 91-96

(B) Georgina Arts Centre & Gallery Future Facility Options – Shortlist Approval

Report No. RC-2018-0009

Recommendation(s): 1. That Council receive Report No. RC-2018-0009 prepared by the

Cultural Services Division, Recreation and Culture Department, dated April 4, 2018, respecting the Georgina Arts Centre & Gallery Future Facility Options Shortlist Approval.

2. That Council approve the shortlist of potential future facility options

for the Georgina Arts Centre & Gallery. 2. That staff report back on the recommended next steps detailed in this

report for for further direction.

Reports from the Operations and Infrastructure Department:

Pages 97-108 (C) Amendment of Traffic By-law 2002-0046 (TR-1), Schedule III; No

Parking (Simcoe Landing)

Report No. OI-2018-0005

Recommendation(s): 1. That Council receive Report No. OI-2018-0005 prepared by the

Operations Division, Operations and Infrastructure Department, dated April 4, 2018 respecting the Amendment of Traffic By-law 2002-0046 (TR-1), Schedule III: No Parking, for Simcoe Landing;

2. That Council amend By-law 2002-0046 (TR-1) – Schedule III Page 1

and Page 2 to reflect the recommendations per Report No. OED-2016-0006: Update of Staff Review of On-Street Parking Arrangement in the Town of Georgina;

3. That Council approve the by-law submitted to amend Traffic By-Law

2002-0046 (TR-1) – Schedule III: No Parking (Simcoe Landing).

April 4, 2018 A 4 2018-04-04

Pages 109-111

(D) Award of Contract for Consulting Services – Engineering Design and Asphalt Inspection

Report No. OI-2018-0009

Recommendation(s): 1. That Council receive Report No. OI-2018-0009 prepared by the

Operations Division, Operations and Infrastructure Department dated April 4, 2018 respecting the selection of consulting services.

2. That Council award the contract for “Consulting Services” to Greer

Galloway Consulting Engineers for the amount of $191,844 excluding applicable taxes.

3. That Council authorize the Purchasing Division to issue a Purchase

Order for RFP OID2018-019: Engineering Services – Engineering Design and Asphalt Inspection and the Director of Operations and Infrastructure enter into a standard Municipal Engineers Association (MEA) Agreement with Greer Galloway Consulting Engineers.

Reports from the Development Services Department

Pages 112-129 (E) Minor Variance Application Process

Zoning Provisions & House Sizes


Recommendation(s):

1. That Council receive Report DS-2018-0034 prepared by the Planning Division, Development Services Department dated April 4, 2018 respecting the Minor Variance Application process, Zoning Provisions and House Sizes.

Pages 130-135

(F) Assumption of Various Roads within Phases 7A and 7B Plan of Subdivision 19TG-2003-001 Simcoe Landing Subdivision Registered Plan 65M-4347 (Phase 7A) Registered Plan 65M-4368 (Phase 7B) Report No. DS-2018-0045 Recommendation(s): 1. That Council receive Report DS-2018-0045 prepared by the

Development Engineering Division, Development Services Department

April 4, 2018 A 5 2018-04-04

dated April 4, 2018 respecting the assumption of various roads within Phase 7 of the Simcoe Landing Subdivision on Registered Plan 65M-4347 (Phase 7A) and Registered Plan 65M-4368 (Phase 7B).

2. That Schedule “A” to By-law 94-60 (PWO-2) be further amended to assume various roads within the Simcoe Landing Subdivision on Registered Plan 65M-4347 (Phase 7A) and Registered Plan 65M-4368 (Phase 7B).

Pages 136-152

(G) Mourning Dove Road Extension Request Lot 259, Plan 427 Report No. DS-2018-0046 Recommendation(s): 1. That Council receive Report DS-2018-0046 prepared by the

Development Engineering Division, Development Services Department dated April 4, 2018 respecting an application for extension of Mourning Dove Road.

2. That the request to extend Mourning Dove Road across the frontage

of Lot 259, Plan 427 be approved and Council adopt a by-law authorizing the the Mayor and Clerk to execute a Development Agreement made between Thomas & Pernille Bojin, as the Owners, and the Corporation of the Town of Georgina relating to the extension of Mourning Dove Road.

Report from the Corporate Services Department: Pages 153-168

(H) Revisions to the Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes Policy

Report No. CS-2018-0009

Recommendation(s): 1. That Council receive Report No. CS-2018-0009 prepared by the

Clerk’s Division, Corporate Services Department, dated April 4, 2018, respecting updates to the Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes policy.

2. That Council approve the updates to the policy titled “Use of

Corporate Resources for Election Purposes”.

Report from the Chief Administrative Officer:

(I) Verbal Report from staff respecting the Thane Smelter - Response from the Ministry concerning a Letter of Concern

April 4, 2018 A 6 2018-04-04

13. DISPOSITIONS/PROCLAMATIONS, GENERAL INFORMATION ITEMS AND COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT (1) Dispositions/Proclamations

Page 169 (A) Trish Kosar, Georgina by the Lake House Tour, requesting temporary

exemption from the parking by-law during the annual house tour along Lake Drive on Saturday, June 9th between 11:00am and 4:00pm. (Advisement: Council granted temporary exemption from the parking by-law for this event in 2017)

Page 170-171 (B) Canada TNA, Toronto/Ontario Area Chapter and Newmarket,

requesting municipalities recognize the 6th International Trigeminal Neuralgia Day by lighting buildings in teal/blue, wearing teal/blue to support awareness and advertise its participation in the ‘Light Up Teal’ event on October 7th. (Advisement: Council supported this request in 2017 by lighting up the Civic Centre)

Page 172 (C) Bill Mauro, Minister of Municipal Affairs, outlining recent reforms to

municipal eligible investment authorities under the Municipal Act, 2001. Page 173

(D) Sutton Agricultural Society requesting Council declare the 163rd Sutton Fair and Horse Show being held from August 9-12 a ‘Community Festival Event’, temporary closure of Fairpark Lane between Hawkins Street and Snooks Road, and permission to operate an Entertainment Tent.

Page 174 (E) Sutton BIA requesting temporary closure of Market Square Crescent and

Market Street between 7:00am and 5:00pm during its Spring Fling to be held on Saturday, May 26th.

Pages 175-181 (F) Manish Rughani, Advisory Team Walk for Values, requesting Council

proclaim April 24th as ‘Human Values Day’ and support the ‘Walk for Values’ to bring greater awareness about human values that shape our lives and the future of our children.

Page 182 (G) Dipika Damerla, Minister of Seniors Affairs, inviting submission of

nominations for the 2018 Senior of the Year Award by the deadline of April 30, 2018.

Pages 183-184 (H) Friends of the Greenbelt Foundation announcing its ‘Prosperous

Greenbelt and Resilient Greenbelt’ funding streams and encouraging potential applicants to submit a Letter of Intent y April 10th.

Pages 185-186 (I) Percy Hatfield, MPP, Windsor-Tecumseh, supporting Georgina

Council’s position to disallow the DG Group’s application to construct a subdivision on the Maple Lake Estates land.

April 4, 2018 A 7 2018-04-04

Pages 187 (2) General Information Items

(3) Committee of Adjustment Planning Matters

(A) Under Review Pages 188-190

(B) Recommendations Pages 191-193 (C) Decisions

14. MOTIONS/NOTICES OF MOTION 15. REGIONAL BUSINESS 16. OTHER BUSINESS 17. BY-LAWS

Pages 194-200 (1) By-law Number 2018-0030 (PWO-2), being a by-law to amend By-law No. 94-

60 (PWO-2), and assume certain roads as public highway in the Town of Georgina; Bardawill Ave, Bostock Dr, Grey Wing Ave, Hickory Ridge St, Paulgrave Ave, Bud Legget Cres, Fred Mason Dr. (Advisement: Refer to Report No. DS-2018-0045, item No. 12(2)(F) of this agenda)

Page 201 (2) By-law Number 2018-0031 (CON-1), being a by-law to authorize the Mayor

and Clerk to execute a Development Agreement between Thomas and Pernille Bojin, owners, and the Town of Georgina, Road Extension of Mourning Dove Road for a length of 22 metres (Advisement: Refer to Report No. DS-2018-0046, item No. 12(2)(G) of this agenda)

Page 202 (3) By-law Number 2018-0032 (TR-1), being a by-law to amend By-law 2002-0046

(TR-1), Schedule III, to regulate traffic and control the parking of vehicles in Simcoe Landing (Advisement: Refer to Report No. OI-2018-0005, Item No. 12(2)(C) of this agenda)

Pages 203-206 (4) By-law Number 500-2018-0011 (PL-5), being a by-law to amend Zoning Bylaw

No. 500, JRAD INVESTMENTS INC., Part Lot 7, Concession 3 (NG), Parts 62 & 65, Plan 65R-31761, s/w Dovedale Drive and Woodbine Avenue (Advisement: Refer to Report No. DS-2018-0044 considered by Council on April 4, 2018)

18. CLOSED SESSION

(1) Motion to move into closed session of Council

(A) LABOUR RELATIONS OR EMPLOYEE NEGOTIATIONS, SECTION 239(2)(d), MA - C.U.P.E. 905.26 Roads and Water Bargaining Update

April 4, 2018 A 8 2018-04-04

(B) A PROPOSED OR PENDING ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF LAND BY THE MUNICIPALITY OR LOCAL BOARD, SECTION 239 (2)(c), MA - Jackson’s Point Land Acquisition Update - Land Acquisition Update

(C) ADVICE THAT IS SUBJECT TO SOLICITOR-CLIENT PROVILEGE INCLUDING COMMUNICATIONS NECESSARY FOR THAT PURPOSE, SECTION 239 (2)(f), MA - Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority Decision for Maple

Lake Estates subdivision

(2) Motion to reconvene into open session of Council and report on matters discussed in closed session.

19. CONFIRMING BY-LAW

Pages 207-210 (1) By-law No. 2018-0033 (COU-2), a by-law to confirm the proceedings of

Council on April 4, 2018.

20. MOTION TO ADJOURN

Staff:


COUNCIL MINUTES

**2018 Budget Review and Deliberations**

Tuesday, January 23, 2018 9:00AM

Winanne Grant, Chief Administrative Officer David Reddon, Director of Corporate Services/Deputy CAO Harold Lenters, Director of Development Services Robin McDougall, Director of Recreation and Culture Ron Jenkins, Director of Emergency Services and Fire Chief Bev Moffatt, Director of Human Resources Dan Pisani, Director of Operations and Infrastructure Karyn Stone, Manager of Economic Development and Tourism Development Rob Wheater, Treasurer Geoff Harrison, Acting Manager of Taxation/Revenue/Customer Service Darlene Carson-Hildebrand, Manager of Finance & Deputy Treasurer Phil Rose-Donahoe, Manager of Cultural Services Ken McAlpine, Landscape Architect Shawn Conde, Manager of Information Technology Ryan Cronsberry, Manager of Municipal Law Enforcement/C.M.L.E.O. Devon Dillabough, Supervisor of Inspections/Deputy CBO Patti White, Manager of Recreation Services John Armstrong, Acting Director of Operations and Infrastructure Michael Rozario, Deputy Fire Chief Stirling Munro, Manager of Purchasing Rod Larmer, Manager of Building and Chief Building Official Tanya Thompson, Communications Manager John Espinosa, Town Clerk Carolyn Lance, Council Services Coordinator

1. CALL TO ORDER- MOMENT OF MEDITATION

"We would like to begin today's meeting by acknowledging that the Town of Georgina is located over lands originally used and occupied by the First Peoples of the Williams Treaties First Nations and other Indigenous Peoples and thank them for sharing this land. We would also like to acknowledge the Chippewas of Georgina Island First Nation as our close neighbour and friend, one with which we strive to build a cooperative and respectful relationship."

A moment of meditation was observed .

1

January 23, 2018 Budget M 2 2018-01-23

Council recognized the passing of John Dallimore, WWII veteran, 57 years as a member of the Pefferlaw Lions Club and volunteer Fireman, honoured last fall with the Citizen of the Year award.

Council recognized the passing of Thomas "Jamie" Huntley, longtime resident of the Town of Georgina.

2. ROLL CALL

The following Members of Council were present:

Mayor Quirk Councillor Biggerstaff Councillor Neeson Councillor Harding

3. COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS

Regional Councillor Davison Councillor Fellini Councillor Sebo

(1) Georgina 200 Celebration 'Did You Know'

Regional Councillor Davison read a Georgina 200 Fact concerning the creation of York County out of the Home District in 1792; the order of survey for "the Gwillimbury's" was issued in 1800.

•Flood advisory to watch children and animals near waterways, ditches, etc •Town PA Day Camps, February 2nd •February 6th, "Tourism Now: Getting to Know Central Counties" Workshop at the Ramada Jackson's Point Resort and Spa, February 6th, 6:00-B:OOpm, register at Georgina.ca/events


•correspondence related to the budget (Royal Canadian Legion)


Moved by Councillor Neeson, Seconded by Councillor Harding

RESOLUTION NO. C-2018-0028

That the agenda, with the addendum item, be approved.

Carried.

2

January 23, 2018 Budget M 3 2018-01-23

6. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND GENERAL NATURE THEREOF

Councillor Neeson declared a pecuniary interest in all staffing requests because he is a member of C.U.P.E. and employed with York Region.

Councillor Biggerstaff declared a pecuniary interest in the items respecting the use of Broadband under the Information Technology Department as her spouse bids on contracts respecting the use of Broadband

Councillor Biggerstaff declared a pecuniary interest in Contracted Services for General programs and Seniors programs as she is contracted to provide these services.

7. ADOPTION OF MINUTES None.

8. SPEAKERS

Mayor Quirk inquired if there was anyone in attendance who wished to speak to any item on the agenda;

Walter Mackey, Royal Canadian Legion, 10 Wood river Bend, Apt. 3A and Rod Beswick, 76 Sandra Drive, informed Council that the majority of the Legion members agree with the relocation of the Keswick Cenotaph and are discussing fundraising opportunities.

New staff introductions: Harold Lenters introduced Zaidun Alganabi, Manager of Development Engineering Dan Pisani introduced Dean Rurak, Manager of Operations and Infrastructure and Lawrence Artin, Manager of Parks and Facilities

Moved by Councillor Sebo, Seconded by Regional Councillor Davison


That Walter Mackey and Rod Beswick of the Royal Canadian Legion respecting the relocation of the Keswick Cenotaph be received.

Carried.



3

January 23, 2018 Budget M 4 2018-01-23

11. PUBLIC MEETINGS None.

(1) STATUTORY MEETING(S) UNDER THE PLANNING ACT OR MEETINGS PERTAINING TO THE CONTINUATION OF PLANNING MATTERS None.

(2) STATUTORY MEETING(S) UNDER OTHER LEGISLATION None. (3) OTHER PUBLIC MEETINGS None.

12. REPORTS

(1) ADOPTION OF REPORTS NOT REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION None.

(2) REPORTS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION

Report from the Corporate Services Department:

(A) 2018 Draft Budget Supplemental Information Report

Report No. CS-2018-0005

Rob Wheater advised that the supplemental report was to provide additional information on items. Some major capital projects in the draft budget include the Pefferlaw Fire Station, new Aerial Apparatus, repair/reconstruction of McCowan Road, Duclos Point Road, Smith Blvd and Church Street, West Park Design, the Link Phases 2 and 3, the Wexford Pump Upgrade and the conceptual design of the Civic Centre.

The proposed tax increase is 1.95%, equating to $41 per year, with the option of adding 1% additional contribution to capital reserves equating to 2.95% or $60 per year per household.

Some items of significance in the draft operating budget include the full funding of minimum wage increase, full funding of the cost of living allowance, preserving the level of contributions to capital reserves, providing the option to increase the contributions to capital reserves and the addition of 11 new staff compliment including full-time and part-time.

Moved by Councillor Harding, Seconded by Councillor Fellini


1. That Council receive Report No. CS-2018-0005 prepared by the Office of the Treasurer, Corporate Services Department dated January 23, 2018 respecting additional information in regards to the 2018 Draft Budget.

Carried.

4

January 23, 2018 Budget M 5 2018-01-23

2018 BUDGET SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION PACKAGE

CAPITAL; NEW INITIATIVES

•Page 134, KESWICK CENOTAPH RELOCATION, was moved forward and dealt with;

Moved by Councillor Neeson, Seconded by Councillor Biggerstaff

That the Rules of Procedure be waived to permit Walter Mackey to address Council.

Carried.

Walter Mackey of the Sutton Branch of the Royal Canadian Legion advised that the cenotaph should be in an open location that can be easily seen by the public.

Moved by Councillor Neeson, Seconded by Councillor Fellini

That the Rules of Procedure be waived to permit Rod Beswick to address Council.

Carried.

Rod Beswick stated that the members of the Sutton Branch of the Royal Canadian Legion would appreciate being involved in all aspects of the relocation and noted that considerations should include parade routes and available parking.

APPROVE $155,000 in principle, allocate funds, direction given to staff to submit an information report to answer questions raised.

TAB 2- OPERATIONS AND INFRASTRUCTURE

•Page. 6, 18-PWK-1, Fleet Replacement, $605, 750; •Back Hoe Replacement V18-00, $150,000, •Front End Loader V0-19, 2007, $225,000, •1 Ton Dump Truck V0-10-5500, $80,000, •1 Ton Pickup Truck V0-13 5500, $80,000, •2003 Dodge Pickup 910-3MA, $52,000, •Pickup 01-10, $18,750 APPROVED

•Page. 10, 18-PWK-2, Equipment Replacement, $102,000; •2 x Chipper Caps for Tandem Dump Trucks, $16,000 each, $32,000 total•1996 Asphalt Hot Box, $35,000, •Culvert Steamer VERS Replacement, $20,000, •Replacement of 1975 Pole (culvert) Trailer, $30,000 APPROVED

•Page. 13, 18-PWK-3, Asset Management of Core Infrastructure, Roads 2018 Maintenance Program, $2,020.000; McCowan Road maintenance program from Ravenshoe Road to Baseline Road APPROVE; staff determine to what extent Georgina must repair the road, or in partnership with the Region to bring it up to

5

January 23, 2018 Budget M 6 2018-01-23

standard for assumption. A road must meet certain criteria prior to assumption by the Region. Discussions with the Region will continue concerning its assumption of McCowan Road.

•Page 16, 18-PWK-4, NOW Need Roads, $1,700,000; Rehabilitation of Duclos Point Road, Expanded Asphalt and HL4 ($500,000), Smith Boulevard from Park Road to 3.6 km east of Park Road, Double-Surface Treatment rehabilitation and Slurry Seal ($500,000) and Church Street, full reconstruction to an urban standard (curb and gutter) from Metro Road to Shorecrest Road (320 metres for $700,000) APPROVED

•Page 19, 18-PWK-5, Portable Sidewalk Grinder, $10,000 APPROVED

•Page 21, 18-PWK-6, Four Portable Speed Radar Signs, $14,000 APPROVED

•Page 24, 18-PWK-7, OSIM (Ontario Structural Inspection Manual) Bridge and Culvert Inspection, $12,000 APPROVED

•Page 27, 18-PWK-8, Replacement of East Sidewalk on Dalton Road, cost-sharing at 40% Town/60% Region, $85,000 APPROVE; Staff to report back with scope of work

•Page 29, Flex beam at De La Salle, $36,500 APPROVED Mayor Quirk requested staff report to Council respecting the implementation of temporary speed bumps, rumble strips or some form of traffic speed reduction in the De La Salle and Willow Beach areas along Lake Drive during the summer months, as a test pilot basis for the 2018 summer season 18-PWK-10, Thorah Park Blvd. , $43,650 APPROVED

•Page 31, 18-PRK-1, Parks and Facilities Vehicle Replacement Truck Replacement P1-08 (5500) and Garbage Compactor (Parks), $200,000 Truck Replacement P4-07, Dakota Crew Cab (Parks), $35,000 Truck Replacement P2-05, Dodge RAM (Parks), $32,000 Truck Replacement P2-07, Dodge RAM (Parks), $35,000 Truck Replacement H-109 (Forestry), $65,000 = 367,000 APPROVED

•Truck Replacement P3-10 F350, $67,000 PARKED

Staff requested to provide an annual report to Council summarizing savings realized through vehicle sales and/or trade-ins

•Page 35, 18-PRK-2, Replacement of 2 lawn tractors, John Deere ZTraks, $40,000 APPROVED Page 38, 18-PRK-3, Sutton (NWSDA) Community Park Design, Baseline Road Park Rob Wheater; funding could include Development Charges, Long Term Debt Federal Gas Tax or Corporate Capital Reserve; need to submit the project to AMO to determine Gas Tax funding eligibility

6

January 23, 2018 Budget M 7 2018-01-23

Robin McDougall; recreational community space is anticipated for this community; at risk of a shortfall of recreational services provision if it is not developed. In the development stage, 5.9 hectares in total of parkland was dedicated to the municipality for this area; Wyndham Park, a community park and a parkette Ken McAlpine; suggested design-bid builds; based on concept plan by consultant, potential park equipment include junior/senior playgrounds, open green, multi-use court, half-court basketball, splash pad, trail/fitness stations, parking lot, shade structure. Baseball diamond to be considered in the design APPROVED ·staff to provide design and funding allocation

•Page 41, 18-PRK-4, Bayview Bridge Refurbishment, $35,000 APPROVED •Page 44, 18-PRK-5 Continuation of EAB (Emerald Ash Borer) Program, $365,000 APPROVED Dan Pisani; to date, the municipality's expense toward EAB has been $32,000 in 2013, $175,000 in 2014, $300,000 in 2015, $360,000 on 2016, and approximately $250,000 2017 year to date, equating to $1.1 Million to date.

Council requested a firm figure of what the municipality has spent so far, once the 2017 year to date is available.

Moved by Councillor Biggerstaff, Seconded by Councillor Harding

That the meeting recess at 11:05 a.m.

Carried.

The meeting reconvened at 11:20 a.m.

Councillor Biggerstaff declared a pecuniary interest in pages 358 and 362 respecting contracts of services for adult and seniors programming. Prior to her election to Council, 2017 allocation was made as well as her contract put in place. The two lines in the 2018 budget will complete the funding for those contracts.

•Page 46, 18-PRK-6 Full Redevelopment of West Park (Design Portion), $850,000 ($740,000 Consultants, $60,000 LSRCA Permits, $50,000 Subwatershed Study •Option 1 (full rebuild) suggested, with phasing in of Option 1 B amenities based on cost and phasing stage

PARKED pending receipt of additional information from staff identifying specific costs for rehabilitation and to individual amenities

•Page 50, 18-PRK-7 Woodbine Avenue Streetscape Improvements - Median Replanting, $60,000 PARKED for separate vote

7

January 23, 2018 Budget M 8 2018-01-23

•Page 52, 18-ROC-1 Relocation of Ball Field Fencing to convert ROC #3 Ball Diamond to a Minor (smaller) Field, $60,000 APPROVED

•Page 56, 18-ROC-2 Supply and Installation of Sports Lighting at ROC Field #4, $200,000 PARKED for separate vote

Staff was requested to determine, over the next year, if there is grant funding that may be available to use towards work at the ROC Field #4.

Moved by Councillor Sebo, Seconded by Councillor Biggerstaff

That the Council Meeting recess at 12:26 p.m.

Carried.

The meeting reconvened at 1:04 p.m.

•Page 60, 18-HAL-1, Georgina Ice Palace- TSSA Project, engineering review/TSSA inspection $40,000 APPROVED

•Page 63, 18-HAL-2, Club 55 - Sutton Modifications, $1 00,000; EARMARK $1 00,000, request report from staff and Sutton Seniors Executive clarifying the required details, for complete discussion, including building study results prior to any expenditure •Page 66, 18-HAL-3, Fixed Ladder Replacement, $30,000 APPROVED •Page 68, 18-HAL-4, Pefferlaw Lions Hall - Domestic Hot Water Tank, $15,000 APPROVED •Page 70, 18-HAL-5, Roches Point Memorial Hall - Roof Shingle Replacement, $15,000 APPROVED •Page 72, 18-HAL-6, New Tables for existing Town Facilities, 10 for Club 55 Keswick, 10 for KIN Hall, $12,500 APPROVED •Page 74, 18-HAL-7, Belhaven Community Hall Parking Lot Upgrades, $94,800 APPROVED, Request to include the Executive of the Hall Board and Chair, Ms. Pegg in discussions •Page 76, 18-HAL-8 Udora Community Hall Parking Lot, $111,500 APPROVED •Page 78, 18-ICE-1 Asset Management, Ice Palace Sections 1 and 7 Roof Replacements, $230,000 APPROVED •Page 81, 18-ICE-2 Replacement Primary Ice Resurfacer at the Georgina Ice Palace, $97,000 APPROVED •Page 83, 18-LNK-1, The Link Phases 2 and 3 Interior Renovations, $1,785,000 APPROVED •Page 88, 18-GLP-1, Georgina Leisure Pool - Pump Motor Valve Replacement, $30,000 APPROVED

8

January 23, 2018 Budget M 9 2018-01-23

TAB 10, LIBRARY •Page 192, 18-LIB-1, Sutton Library Branch - Service Desk Redesign, $40,000 APPROVED Library CEO requested to obtain advice from GAAC Members, source a reasonablypriced builder to be funded from corporate capital reserve, and seek alternatives to an architect as a cost-saving measure. •Page 194, 18-LIB-2, Marketing and Branding Consultant, $29,000 APPROVED •Page 249, NI-LIB-1, E-Learning Resources, $10,000 APPROVED •Page 251 NI-LIB-2, Library Furniture Replacements, $5,000 APPROVED •Page 253 NI-LIB-3, Library Technology Updates, $4,500 APPROVED •Page 255 NI-LIB-4, Library Self-check Stations Upgrades, $5,200 APPROVED

STAFFING

Councillor Neeson declared a pecuniary interest in all staffing items; Councillor Neeson did not participate in any discussion or vote concerning staffing items

•Page 293, SR-LIB-1 Additional Hours, Pefferlaw Branch Librarian, 35 hours per week, $17,000

Moved by Reginal Councillor Davison, Seconded by Councillor Biggerstaff

That the Rules of Procedure be waived to permit Suzette Leeming, Chair of the Georgina Public Library Board, to address Council.

Carried.

Suzette Leeming advised that it is a common practice for most of the libraries systems to be closed on Mondays and is not just a staffing issue.

SR-LIB-1 Additional Hours, Pefferlaw Branch Librarian $17,000 APPROVED •Page 296, SR-LIB-2 Library Administration Assistant (Part Time), $35,030 APPROVED •Page 299, SR-LIB-3 Children's Summer Reading Club Assistant (Summer Student), $9,000 APPROVED

TAB 3- RECREATION AND CULTURE •Page 116, 18-CUL-1 Georgina Pioneer Village schoolhouse design, $15,000 Request to look at enhancing maintenance for Canada 200 event APPROVED •Page 120, 18-CUL-2 Safety and Security Improvements $10,000 APPROVED •Page 123, 18-CUL-3 The Link Accessibility and Signage $12,000 APPROVED •Page 125, 18-REC-1 Waterfront Safety Signage and Equipment $20,000 APPROVED

9

January 23, 2018 Budget M 10 2018-01-23

•Page 128, 18-REC-2 Pefferlaw Ice Pad Roof $267,500 APPROVED (from Gas Tax) •Page 131, 18-REC-3 Land Acquisition and property clean up, 127 Riveredge Drive $50,000 REMOVED -was removed as it is a duplicate from the 2017 budget •Page 134, 18-REC-4 Keswick cenotaph relocation PREVIOUSLY DEALT WITH

*Holmes Point Park Part-Time staff was approved in 2017 under New Initiatives, also stated at that time that in 2018 staff will investigate the need for a permanent washroom. This has not been included in this 2018 budget document. Direction is required.

Staff was requested to investigate a permanent washroom at Holmes Point Park during the 2018 year for the 2019 budget consideration, and investigate the use of portable washrooms for the 2018 year.

Staff was requested to also investigate the installation of permanent washroom facilities at various Town locations as required, including financial requirements, for submission of a report by June of 2018, for approval and completion in 2019.

TAB 4- FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICES

•Page 136, 18-FIR-1 Replacement of Aerial Apparatus $650,000 Fire Underwriter's Survey advises that if you have buildings over three storeys in height, an aerial device is required, as well as a backup aerial device. APPROVED •Page 138, 18-FIR-2 Replacement of Fire & Rescue Service Vehicles, $175,000 APPROVED •Page 140, 18-FIR-3 Replacement of Suppression Equipment $44,000 APPROVED •Page 143, 18-FIR-4 Purchase of Heavy Hydraulic Auto Extraction Rescue Equipment $40,000 APPROVED •Page 145, 18-FIR-5 Purchase of Pagers, Tablets and Fire Investigation Equipment $17,700 APPROVED •Page 147, 18-FIR-6 Purchase of Bunker Gear and PPE $40,000 APPROVED •Page 149, 18-FIR-7 Purchase of Portable Radios $30,000 APPROVED •Page 151, 18-FIR-8 Station 1-4 (Keswick) Repairs and Expansion, $102,000 APPROVED •Page 154, 18-FIR-9 Station 1-6 (Sutton) Repairs, $46,200 APPROVED •Page 156, 18-FIR-10 Station 1-8 (Pefferlaw) Rebuild $3,740,000 APPROVED PREVIOUSLY

TAB 5 - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

•Page 158, 18-PLN-1 Planning Application Fees Review, $30,000 APPROVED

10

January 23, 2018 Budget M 11 2018-01-23

•Page 161 18-ENG-1 New Truck $40,000 PARKED pending discussion on 'new staffing'

The Fleet Manager was requested to consider the potential of electric vehicles when replacing some Town vehicles; can go 400 kilometres on a single charge, recharging while driving, completely recyclable, none goes to landfill, no greenhouse gas emissions, quiet.


That the meeting recess at 3:02 p.m.

Carried.

Reconvened at 3:12p.m.

TAB 7 -CORPORATE SERVICES

TAB2

Councillor Biggerstaff declared a pecuniary interest in Item 18-ITS-1 as her spouse works in the communication technology field; Councillor Biggerstaff did not participate in any discussion or vote on Item 18-ITS-1.

•Page 163, 18-ITS-1 Annual Corporate Information and Communications Technology Cycling Program $349,500 APPROVED •Page 167, 18-ITS-2 Customer Relationship Management Solution $100,000 APPROVED •Page 170, 18-ITS-3 Corporate IT Strategic Plan $60,000 APPROVED •Page 173, 18-ITS-4 Security Camera Upgrades $25,000 APPROVED •Page 175, 18-ITS-5 Council/Committee Agenda Software $19,000 APPROVED •Page 179, 18-MLE-1 Asset/Fleet Replacement- two 2009 Toyota Corollas with two new mid-size SUV's and required markings and safety lighting $70,000 APPROVED •Page 182 18-MLE-2 Animal Shelter Lobby Renovation, Storage and Additional Access Controls, $29,000 APPROVED •Page 185 18-MLE-3 Mobile Parking Ticketing $36,000 APPROVED •Page 188, 18-CA0-1 Land/Property Acquisition for Broad Corporate Purposes APPROVED •Page 189, 18-CA0-2 Civic Centre Replacement Program- Next Steps, $1,500,000 APPROVED (long term debt) Winanne Grant; Estimated construction value was from September 2016, staff is identifying timelines for priority capital projects; Fire Hall, MURC, Civic Centre

•Page 91 , Fire Hydrant Painting, $25,000 APPROVED

11

January 23, 2018 Budget M 12 2018-01-23

•Page 93, Water Building Condition Assessment, $10,000 APPROVED •Page 95, Vehicle Replacement and Purchase (50% Water expense); End of Life Replacement of W6-05 Cube Van, W7-10 Pickup, 01-10 Pickup, W1-12 Pickup, $109,375 APPROVED •Page 98, SCADA Enhancements $29,500 APPROVED •Page 100, Asset Replacement Strategy for Wexford Pumping Station $250,000 APPROVED •Page 103, Church Street Water Service Replacement $150,000 APPROVED •Page 105, Engineering for Watermain Project $75,000 APPROVED •Page 107, Pumping Station Roof Replacement(s) $22,000 APPROVED •Page 109, Wastewater Building Condition Assessments $120,000 APPROVED •Page 111, Vehicle Replacement (50% Sewer Expense), End of Life Replacement of W6-05 Cube Van, W7-10 Pickup, 01-10 Pickup, W1-12 Pickup, $109,375 APPROVED

NEW OPERATING INITIATIVES

TAB3 •Page 196, N 1-PWK-1, Storm Water Management- Road Side Ditching, Expanded Ditching Program $87,000 APPROVED *Storm Water Master Plan consists of 3 steps; Step 1 was the development of a master plan, adopted by Council, Step 2 was to develop a 1 0-year maintenance program. Step 3 is road side ditching. Maintenance plan still to be developed

Staff was requested to investigate the Island Drive/Lake Drive area, the area of Metro Road and Joel Avenue, as well as properties at the south end of Fairbank Avenue, which flood frequently; the major drainage issues need to be addressed on a permanent basis.

•Page 198, NI-PRK-1, Afforestation, $7,500 APPROVED •Page 200, NI-PRK-2, GL Dedicated to the Maintenance and Repair of Fencing, $10,000 APPROVED •Page 202, NI-PRK-3, Permanent GL dedicated to Maintenance and Repair of Key Streetscapes $30,000 APPROVED •Page 205, NI-WAT-1, Remote Building Security Access, Wastewater Division, $6,000 APPROVED •Page 207, NI-WAT-2, SCADA Maintenance Contract $2,600 APPROVED •Page 209, NI-SEW-1, Remote Building Security Access, Water Division, $6,000 APPROVED •Page 211, NI-CUL-1, St. Leacock Theatre- Light Console Board, $7,500 APPROVED •Page 214, NI-CUL-2 GEDAC 'Music in the Streets' $3,000 APPROVED •Page 216, NI-REC-1 Canada 150 Project Celebrations $3,000 APPROVED •Page 218, NI-REC-2 Georgina 200 Celebrations $32,350 APPROVED

12

January 23, 2018 Budget M 13 2018-01-23

•Page 220, NI-REC-3, Georgina Gym, Lease Photocopier/Printer, $4,800 APPROVED •Page 223, NI-REC-4, Special Event and Programming Walkie Talkies, $5,000 APPROVED •Page 226, NI-FIR-1, YRP/Fire Department's Shared Dispatch - Fee Increase $10,895 APPROVED •Page 228, NI-FIR-2, Overtime to Accommodate Mandatory 'Road to Mental Readiness' Training $$14,000 APPROVED •Page 230, NI-FIR-3 Increased Public Education, $7,600 APPROVED •Page 232, NI-FIR-4 TableUSoftware Programming Fees $7,500 APPROVED •Page 234, NI-ECD-1, Economic Incentive Grant Program $100,000 APPROVED IN PRINCIPLE pending Council's consideration of a policy and criteria Karyn Stone; staff intends to develop a policy and criteria that will accompany this grant incentive program that will be submitted to Council for final approval Rob Wheater; $100,000 is in the Tax Levy but should be from the Rate Stabilization Reserve; removing it from the tax levy will reduce the tax levy by .25 percent, or Council could choose to contribute 1.25 percent extra to Reserves

•Page 237, NI-ECD-2, Annual hydro services contribution to Sutton Mill Pond Fountain, $2,280 PARKED for separate vote

•Page 240, NI-ITS-1, Human Resources Information System Software, $60,000 APPROVE

•Page 244, NI-COM-1 Annual Community Report Funding, $10,000 - linked to new staffing requests (Page 283, SR-COM-1, Communications Specialist) PARKED pending discussion on 'new staffing'

•Page 247, NI-CA0-1, Various Growth Studies/Reviews, $10,000 if required APPROVED

Councillor Neeson declared a pecuniary interest with all staffing items; Councillor Neeson did not participate in any discussion or vote concerning staffing items

TAB 4, NEW STAFFING

Operations and Infrastructure •Page 257, SR-PWK-1, Temporary Administrative Assistant - Fleet and Capital Projects $53,870 APPROVED •Page 260, SR-PWK-2, Roads Technologist, $71,230 APPROVED •Page 266, SR-WAT-1, Compliance Coordinator, $71,230 APPROVED

Development Services •Page 270, SR-BLD-1, Application Examiner, Full Time, $23,070 APPROVED •Page 273, SR-ENG-1, Development Inspector, Full Time $69,080 APPROVED

13

January 23, 2018 Budget M 14 2018-01-23

•Page276, SR-ENG-2, Technologist, Full Time $75,560 APPROVED •Page 283, SR-COM-1, Communications Specialist, Full Time $60,460 APPROVED •Page 279, SR-ECD-1, Part Time Summer Student (information Outreach Coordinator), $7,940 APPROVED Karyn Stone; will be confident in skillset required to move the Economic Development Division forward by the end of the year; will provide a detailed job description for evaluation by the end of the summer to determine if this part time position should be transitioned to full-time EARMARK $25,000, request staff to develop a full-time position within Economic Development Division, reporting to Council with details for consideration in July or August of 2018 to determine if position will be included Karyn Stone; has applied to Canada Summer Jobs program for funding assistance to pay for this 16-week position

Moved by Councillor Sebo, Seconded by Councillor Harding

That the meeting recess at 4:45p.m.

Carried.

14

January 23, 2018 Budget M 15 2018-01-23

The Meeting reconvened at 9:00a.m. on Wednesday, January 24, 2018.

Staff:

2018 Budget Review and Deliberations

Wednesday, January 24, 2018 9:00AM

Winanne Grant, Chief Administrative Officer David Reddon, Director of Corporate Services/Deputy CAO Harold Lenters, Director of Development Services Robin McDougall, Director of Recreation and Culture Ron Jenkins, Director of Emergency Services and Fire Chief Bev Moffatt, Director of Human Resources Dan Pisani, Director of Operations and Infrastructure Karyn Stone, Manager of Economic Development and Tourism Development Rob Wheater, Treasurer Geoff Harrison, Acting Manager of Taxation/Revenue/Customer Service Darlene Carson-Hildebrand, Manager of Finance & Deputy Treasurer Ryan Cronsberry, Manager of Municipal Law Enforcement/C.M.L.E.O. Mark Pourvahidi, Executive Director of Capital Initiatives John Armstrong, Director of Operations and Infrastructure Mike Rozario, Deputy Fire Chief Tanya Thompson, Communications Manager John Espinosa, Town Clerk Carolyn Lance, Council Services Coordinator




TAB 5- OPERATING BUDGET DETAIL, BASE BUDGET

Mayor Quirk inquired ifthere are any programs, service or line items within the base budget requiring separation for discussion;

•Page 306, Net Debris, Litter; $41 ,390; this is the cost of cleaning litter from ditches annually; speaks to the benefit of a potential anti-litter campaign •Gravel resurfacing work was conducted and completed at boat launches

15

January 23, 2018 Budget M 16 2018-01-23

Councillor Biggerstaff declared pecuniary interest in pages 358 and 362 respecting contracts of services for adult and seniors programming. Prior to her election to Council, 2017 allocation was made as well as her contract put in place; these two line items will complete the funding for those contracts. Councillor Biggerstaff did not participate in any discussion or vote on these line items.

•Page 358, Account No. 1-2-4513101-3410, Contracted Services, $35,500 •Page 361, Account No. 1-2-4514354-3410, Seniors Programs Club 55, Contracted Services $9,300 •Page 393, Account No. 1-2-3554000-3410, Broadband Services, Contracted Services $54,540

QUESTIONS •Page 319, Weed Harvesting Program; Device designed to remove aquatic weeds down to 4 or 5 feet with attachments for suction/dredging/fire suppression, $120,000; •staff was requested to prepare a report on the concept of expanding service delivery into weed harvesting and procuring the necessary equipment on a contracted service or in-house at either the existing service level or at an expanded service level, with input from the Georgina Environmental Advisory Committee

•Page 328, Net Planting Program, $494, 149; includes all plantings •Page 335, 'Pefferlaw Church' line item will be removed and absorbed into the cost of the Pefferlaw Fire Hall

•Various lines for mobile phones; suggest consistency be improved concerning 'mobile' vs 'land-line'

•Page 335, Pefferlaw Church line items; 'building repairs and utilities' will remain for asbestos evaluation, etc. •Page 322, Account No. 1-2-1531101-3620, Equipment Rentals $15,500; contingency account, need flexibility to obtain equipment when it breaks •Page 329, Account No. 1-2-1532000-2920, The ROC, Refreshments $45,000; offsets concession sales •Page 362, Account No. 1-2-4514354-3410, Expenses, Miscellaneous $25,000-covers all Snofest expenditures •Page 381, Account No. 1-2-5534000-3908, Economic Initiatives, $5,000; used for initiatives arising out of the Economic Development Committee to participate, it is not connected to the Grant Program •all committees have a variety of line items, suggested staff prepare a report concerning funding allocated to all the committees, to create a more even playing field

TAB 5 APPROVED in its entirety

16

January 23, 2018 Budget M 17 2018-01-23

Moved by Councillor Biggerstaff, Seconded by Councillor Fellini

That the meeting continue past the four-hour timeframe.

Carried.

PARKED ITEMS •Page 32, 18-PRK-1 Parks and Facilities Vehicle Replacement, Parks Truck Replacement- P3-10 (F350) $67,000 APPROVED •used all year; grass cutting in summer, bus stop shoveling in winter, well used, substantial repair requirements needed, well beyond its life

Staff to provide yearly report to summarize what we have salvaged over the year through vehicle sales/trade-ins

•Page 46, 18-PRK-6 Full Redevelopment of West Park

Moved by Councillor Sebo

That staff proceed with Option 5 of the West Park Redevelopment.

Lost ... no seconder

Moved by Regional Councillor Davison, Seconded by Councillor Biggerstaff


That staff approve Capital Investment 18-PRK-6 for the Full Redevelopment of West Park, Option #1 Total Rebuild in the amount of $850,000 and that staff report on the options of a full build vs a multi-year phased-in build for Council's consideration to ensure an appropriate financial decision.

A recorded vote was requested; the Town Clerk recorded the vote as follows:

Regional Councillor Davison Mayor Quirk Councillor Harding Councillor Neeson Councillor Biggerstaff

YEA NAY

X

X

X

X

X

17

January 23, 2018 Budget M

Councillor Fellini Councillor Sebo

YEA- 6 NAY- 1

Carried.

18 2018-01-23

X

X

•Page 50, 18-PRK-7 Woodbine Avenue Streetscape Improvements - Median Replanting, $60,000


That 18-PRK-7, Woodbine Avenue Streetscape Improvements- Median Replanting, $60,000, be denied

Lost. .. no seconder

Moved by Councilor Harding, Seconded by Councillor Sebo

That $30,000 be allocated to the Woodbine Avenue streetscape improvements and $30,000 be allocated to the balance of the Town.

Defeated.



That 18-PRK-7, Woodbine Avenue Streetscape Improvements, Median Replanting in the amount of $60,000 be approved.

A recorded vote was requested, the Town Clerk recorded the vote as follows :

Councillor Biggerstaff Councillor Fellini Councillor Sebo Regional Councillor Davison Mayor Quirk

YEA NAY

X

X

X

X

X

18

January 23, 2018 Budget M

Councillor Harding Councillor Neeson

YEA- 5 NAY- 2

Carried.

19

X

X

•Page 56, 18-ROC-2 Sports Lighting at ROC Field #4, $200,000


2018-01-23

That the Sports Lighting at ROC Field #4 in the amount of $200,000 not proceed at this time and that it be reconsidered during the 2019 budget deliberations.

Defeated.

Moved by Councillor Neeson, Seconded by Councillor Biggerstaff


That the Sports Lighting at ROC Field #4 in the amount of $200,000 be approved and to be funded from Gash-in-Lieu of Park Land Reserve.


Councillor Neeson Councillor Sebo Councillor Davison Mayor Quirk Councillor Harding Councillor Fellini Councillor Biggerstaff

YEA NAY

Carried.

5 2

YEA NAY X

X

X

X

X

X

X

•Page 52, 18-ROC-1, Relocation of Ball Field Fencing to convert ROC #3 Ball Diamond to a Minor (smaller) Field, $60,000 APPROVED •the distance between home plate and the backstop needs to be reduced, will be repositioning the backstop closer to home plate

•Page 161 18-ENG-1 New Truck $40,000 APPROVED

19

January 23, 2018 Budget M 20 2018-01-23

•Page 237, NI-ECD-2, Annual hydro services contribution to Sutton Mill Pond Fountain, $2,280 •BIA to look after installation, removal and maintenance

Winanne Grant advised that staff will report back on financial contributions and relationships with the BIAs, and the partnership framework with the BIA's, establishing expectations for committees and equity for all committees.



That NI-ECD-2 Annual Hydro Services contribution to Sutton Mill Pond Fountain in the amount of $2,280 be approved.


Councillor Fellini Councillor Biggerstaff Councillor Neeson Councillor Sebo Regional Councillor Davison Mayor Quirk Councillor Harding

YEA-5 NAY-2

Carried.

YEA NAY

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

The Udora/Leaskdale Lions Club requested to work with the Town on a proposed pavilion- Uxbridge passed $10,000, the request from the Lions Club is to match the $10,000, from tax rate stabilization reserve, one-time request.

Rob Wheater; GTTI and this project; staff will submit a report on February 71h

indicating final budget figures

Moved by Councillor Harding, Seconded by Regional Councillor Davison


That the Town of Georgina enter into a one-time partnership with the Udora/Leaskdale Lions Club at a matching amount of $10,000 funded from the Tax

20

January 23, 2018 Budget M 21 2018-01-23

Rate Stabilization Reserve, towards a proposed construction of a pavilion at the Udora Community Hall with the understanding that it will have no impact to the tax levy.

Carried unanimously.

Moved by Councillor Fellini, Seconded by Councillor Neeson


That the Georgina Trades Training Incorporated (GTTI) Study be funded in the amount of $9,520 from the base budget and the remaining $35,480 from the Tax Rate Stabilization Reserve.

Carried.

Page 244, NI-COM-1 Annual Community Report Funding, $10,000 APPROVED



That staff be requested to submit a report by the end of February respecting the cost for the purchase and installation of a flagpole and Town of Georgina flag at the Egypt Community Hall.

Carried.

Moved by Councillor Harding, Seconded by Councillor Neeson


That staff submit a report indicating which Town facilities currently do not contain flag poles, and investigating a proposed protocol respecting the cost for the purchase, installation and maintenance of flag poles at all Georgina facilities.

Carried.

Staff was requested to endeavor to prepare these two flag related reports for submission at the March 7th Council Meeting.

Council requested staff to remain vigilant in replacing damaged and/or frayed flags this year, as it is Georgina's 200th anniversary.

21

January 23, 2018 Budget M 22 2018-01-23


That $5,000 be allocated for the installation of finger docks on the Maskinonge River in Sutton either at Mill Pond Park or above the dam behind the Scotia Bank.

Lost ... no seconder

Holmes Point Washrooms; staff is to report on the installation of better portable washroom facilities for use during the 2018 summer season.

Staff was requested to ensure that funding is allocated to repair the broken fencing behind home plate on ROC Field #2.



That the $75,000 remain in the budget and be allocated to the Corporate Capital Reserve.

Carried.

RESPONSES TO EMAIL RECEIVED FROM RESIDENT THIS A.M. Rob Wheater; •2017 budget vs 2017 actuals, recent actuals are better and lower place to start. Showing 2018 base budget being the same as the 2017 final budget but when analyzed, there were a number of columns on there, being (2016) final actuals, 2016 with variance, 2017 year to date to August, estimate of year-end from September to December. Staff listed the 2018 base budget as being the same as the 2017 so that any changes made were within one of those columns and provide comments as to why they were increasing/decreasing. Also, the nature of the business can be seasonal so to purely base it on estimated actuals for year-end or current year-todate actuals would be irresponsible. •zero based budgeting is a concept; it is a good budgeting technique to look at every individual function and building from the base up rather than starting at actuals, but a lot of it comes down to resources •what is account 8168 Reserve for Future Expenditures? That is a reserve contributions from the Operating Fund into all reserves. Supplemental report lists the specific contributions and tie back into the Operating Budget.

Bev Moffat •Do we have a good handle on Full Time Equivalent (FTE)? There are different statuses. Numbers are accurate. Will have even a better handle on it once the HR system up and running.

22

January 23, 2018 Budget M 23 2018-01-23

•Do we fill retiree vacancies? The opportunity is taken to review the position to ensure it is still relevant and needed. Every vacancy from retirees have been filled. • Total payroll costs, are they in keeping with other municipalities? Every three years, a market review is conducted on non-union positions to ensure fiscal responsibility and competitiveness. Every time the Town enters into bargaining, a review and comparison study is conducted. Overall compensation costs are in keeping with other municipalities.

Breakdown of employees: 250 full-time, 39 part-time, 15 temporary, 67 casual, 80 seasonal, 91 sessional, 26 students, 7 Council Members

Winanne Grant; •Clarification of number of Directors; there are 7 directors, and one director who reports to the Library Board and is not included in that number •Page 166, GAO's Departmental Overview, omission of numbers; correct, no FTE's listed. Page 166, Corporate Services Delivery Excellence is 1, Strategic Initiatives Coordinator is 1, Communications is 3. Strategic Initiatives Coordinator position is a good example of a retiree position as that was previously the position of the Executive Assistant to the GAO •Art Centre not in the budget; it is reflected in the Business Plans as being a project for 2018. Relocation of the Gallery was a resolution in 2017 and reflected as a 2018 project, no requirement for dollars

Mayor Quirk and Council expressed their appreciation to staff for their hard work in preparing the 2018 Budget document.

13. DISPOSITIONS/PROCLAMATIONS, GENERAL INFORMATION ITEMS AND COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT None.

(1) Dispositions/Proclamations None. (2) General Information Items None. (3) Committee of Adjustment Planning Matters None.

(a) Under Review (b) Recommendations (c) Decisions

14. MOTIONS/NOTICES OF MOTION None.

15. REGIONAL BUSINESS None.

23

January 23, 2018 Budget M 24 2018-01-23

16. OTHER BUSINESS

•John Dallimore visitation, Forrest and Taylor Funeral Home, Thursday, January 25th, 2:00-4:00, 7:00-9:00pm, Lions Club Memorial Service in the funeral home 1:30pm, Veteran's service Thursday at 7:00pm, service in the chapel on Friday, at 1:30pm. Jamie Huntley, visitation Wednesday, January 24th at Becker's Funeral Home from 2:00-4:00, 7:00-9:00pm, memorial service at Egypt Hall, January 25th at 12:00pm

•Residents were assured that the Nurse-Practitioner Led Clinic phone number is back up and running, it has secured a temporary location at 152 High Street for the administrative operations and is using space at Dr. Mcintyre and Dr. Hall's offices on different days. Relayed suggestion that sign be put up at old location, directing people to the phone number at 152 High Street of 905-722-3251

17. BY-LAWS None.

18. CLOSED SESSION

(1) Motion to move into closed session of Council

Moved by Councillor Fellini, Seconded by Regional Councillor Davison

That Council convene into Closed Session at 11:49 a.m., observe a recess and convene the closed session business at 12:04 p.m. pursuant to Section 239 of The Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, to deal with the following matter(s):

(A) A PROPOSED OR PENDING ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF LAND BY THE MUNICIPALITY OR LOCAL BOARD, SECTION 239 (2) (c), MA

- Maskinonge Pedestrian Bridge - Waterfront Inventory verbal update, re inventory of municipal

parklands

Carried.

(2) Motion to reconvene into open session of Council and report on matters discussed in closed session.

Moved by Regional Councillor Davison, Seconded by Councillor Sebo

That Council rise from Closed Session at 12:40 p.m. and report on matters discussed in closed session.

Carried.

24

January 23, 2018 Budget M 25 2018-01-23

(A) A PROPOSED OR PENDING ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF LAND BY THE MUNICIPALITY OR LOCAL BOARD, SECTION 239 (2) (c), MA

- Maskinonge Pedestrian Bridge - Waterfront Inventory verbal update

Maskinonge Pedestrian Bridge



That staff seek the desired legal counsel and report back to Council.

Carried

Waterfront Inventory Verbal Update

Moved by Councillor Harding, Seconded by Councillor Sebo


That upon receipt of the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority assessment, staff report back to Council.

Carried

Rob Wheater advised that tax levy increase is 1.76% plus an additional 1.19% contribution to Reserves, equating to 2.95%. He also advised that the blended tax rate increase with the Region of York and the School Boards would be approximately 2.4%.

Moved by Councillor Neeson, Seconded by Regional Councillor Davison


That Council direct that the final2018 budget include a 1.19% additional contribution to Reserves.

Carried.

25

January 23, 2018 Budget M 26 2018-01-23

Moved by Councillor Sebo, Seconded by Councillor Fellini


That the Treasure be directed to present on February 7, 2018, the Town of Georgina 2018 budgets including subsidiary motions, declared conflicts and notes as discussed and recorded during deliberations held on January 23rd and 241h, 2018.



Moved by Regional Councillor Davison, Seconded by Councillor Biggerstaff

That the following by-law be approved:

(1) By-law No. 2018-0004 (COU-2), a by-law to confirm the proceedings of Special Council on January 23, 2018.

Carried.



That the meeting adjourn at 12:43pm.

Carried.

Margaret Quirk, Mayor

John Espinosa, Town Clerk

26

Staff:


SPECIAL COUNCIL MINUTES

Thursday, March 22, 2018 7:00PM

David Reddon, Director of Corporate Services/Deputy CAO Harold Lenters, Director of Development Services Ron Jenkins, Director of Emergency Services and Fire Chief John Armstrong, Acting Director of Operations and Infrastructure Ryan Cronsberry, Manager of Municipal Laws Enforcement/C.M.L.E.O. Tyler Nicholson, Municipal Law Enforcement Officer 1 Kim MacGillivray, Communications & Social Media Strategist Rachel Dillabough, Deputy Clerk Carolyn Lance, Council Services Coordinator


"We would like to begin today's meeting by acknowledging that the Town of Georgina is located over lands originally used and occupied by the First Peoples of the Williams Treaties First Nations and other Indigenous Peoples and thank them for sharing this land. We would also like to acknowledge the Chippewas of Georgina Island First Nation as our close neighbour and friend, one with which we strive to build a cooperative and respectful relationship."

2. ROLL CALL

The following Members of Council were present:



3. COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS None.


Item No. 13.2

Item No. 13.2

Item No. 13.2

Correspondence from Aird Berlis, legal counsel for North Gwillimbury Forest Alliance, providing comments Correspondence from Phil Craig in opposition to the development Correspondence from Councillor Neeson providing his concerns with moving forward with the development

27

March 22, 2018 Special Council M

Item No. 13.2 Item No. 13.2

Item No. 13.2

Item No. 13.2

Carried.

2 2018-03-22

Notice of Motion from Councillor Dave Neeson Correspondence from Loralea Carruthers in favour of protecting the North Gwillimbury Forest and Wetlands Correspondence from Tom Sandler referencing the founder of Water Keepers Worldwide Correspondence from 'Protect Our Water and Environmental Resources (P.O.W.E.R.)' in support of the preservation and protection of the environmentally significant Paradise Beach-Island Grove lands




That the agenda, with the following addendum items, be approved:

Item No. 13.2

Item No. 13.2

Item No. 13.2

Item No. 13.2 Item No. 13.2

Item No. 13.2

Item No. 13.2

Carried.

Correspondence from Aird Berlis, legal counsel for North Gwillimbury Forest Alliance, providing comments Correspondence from Phil Craig in opposition to the development Correspondence from Councillor Neeson providing his concerns with moving forward with the development Notice of Motion from Councillor Dave Neeson Correspondence from Loralea Carruthers in favour of protecting the North Gwillimbury Forest and Wetlands Correspondence from Tom Sandler referencing the founder of Water Keepers Worldwide Correspondence from 'Protect Our Water and Environmental Resources (P.O.W.E.R.)' in support of the preservation and protection of the environmentally significant Paradise Beach-Island Grove lands

Mayor Quirk thanked Council Members for attending this Special Council meeting during its March Break. This Council's goal has been to protect the Maple Lake Estates lands.

Mayor Quirk requested that Item No. 13(1 )(A) be moved forward and Council given the opportunity to provide their comments, prior to the Speaker section, noting that no vote will be taken until after the public has spoken.

28

March 22, 2018 Special Council M 3 2018-03-22

Moved by Councillor Harding, Seconded by Regional Councillor Davison

That Item No. 13( 1 )(A) be moved forward.

Carried.

13. DISPOSITIONS/PROCLAMATIONS, GENERAL INFORMATION ITEMS AND COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT

(1) Dispositions/Proclamations

(A) Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority Report No. 10-18-BOD, Maple Lake Estates (DG Group) Permit Application and Proposed Land Transfer, scheduled on the LSRCA Board of Directors Meeting Agenda of March 23rd.

All Council Members voiced their opinions in support of the protection of the Provincially Significant Wetland

Moved by Councilor Biggerstaff, Seconded by Regional Councillor Davison

That the Rules of Procedure be waived to permit Councillor Neeson to put forward his motion

Carried.

Councillor Neeson read out a proposed motion as follows;

WHEREAS 80 percent of the Paradise Beach -Island Grove lands are a Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW);

AND WHEREAS the development of a 1 ,073 unit subdivision on the Paradise Beach - Island Grove PSW would undermine the environmental sustainability of Georgina and the Lake Simcoe community;

AND WHEREAS the development of a 1,073 unit subdivision threatens the current and long-term health of Lake Simcoe;

AND WHEREAS the residents of Ward 3 and the broader community of the Town of Georgina have not been allowed to fully participate in the decision making process that will directly impact the health and quality of life in their community;

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Town of Georgina requests;

• The Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority exercise its mandate to conserve and protect the environmentally significant Paradise Beach - Island

29


Grove lands for the future health of Lake Simcoe and its surrounding communities.

• The Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority decline to issue a section 28 permit on the Maple Lake Estates Property.

• That the Council of the Town of Georgina hereby declares that should the Board of Directors of the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority issue a section 28 permit for the Maple Lake Estates lands, that the Town of Georgina will consider all of the options at its disposal which may include taking legal action.

Not voted on at this time.

6. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND GENERAL NATURE THEREOF None.

7. ADOPTION OF MINUTES None.

8. SPEAKERS

Mayor Quirk requested if anyone was in attendance who wished to speak to the item on the agenda

Jack Gibbons, 430 Raines Street, Roches Point, requested Council support Councillor Neeson's proposed motion to save the provincially significant wetland and North Gwillimbury Forest, to provide strong political leadership to protect Lake Simcoe, its wetlands and forests for today and for future generations.

Councillor Neeson expressed appreciation to Jack Gibbons and to the North Gwillimbury Forest Alliance for their advocacy work

Susan Sheard, 565 Lake Drive, Willow Beach, advised she has learned a lot about the issues facing Lake Simcoe directly from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority and believes they should follow their mandate to protect the watershed. The Authority cannot support the replacement of a wetland with a development and protect the watershed at the same time. Ms. Sheard requested Council to request the Conservation Authority to reject the DG Group's application for permission to build the proposed subdivision in a provincially significant wetland.

Phil Craig, 208 Carrick Avenue, advised that he is a former Georgina Councillor and former representative to the Conservation Authority and requested our Mayor and Regional Councillor to oppose the Conservation Authority's recommendation to approve the development of the North Gwillimbury provincially significant wetland and that a recorded vote be requested at the Conservation Authority meeting.

30


Paul Harp ley, President of the South Lake Simcoe Naturalists, stated that it is time for municipal council to stand up for conservation in their communities, mentioning a section in the Municipal Act that states that Council Members are to represent the public and to consider the well-being and interests of the municipality as a whole.

Bill Major, 11 Corners Avenue, Cannington, advised that it is International Water Day. Mr. Major stated that wetlands are the lungs of the lake and people have a moral and spiritual obligation to care for and preserve the earth and this wetland and urged Council to support the motion.

Katherine Southern, 15 Sandy Point Lane, Island Grove, advised that wetlands play a major role in mitigating flood risk, storm surges and filters runoff from pesticides and salt before it reaches the main water streams. In southern Ontario, 72% of wetlands have already disappeared to urbanization and industrialization. We need to understand climate-change resilience and invest in the wetlands.

Harry Behrend, 835 Lake Drive North, advised that he is not impressed with the Conservation Authority's work to protect the watershed and gives his full support to the proposed.

Moved by Councillor Neeson, Seconded by Councillor Harding


WHEREAS 80 percent of the Paradise Beach -Island Grove lands are a Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW);

AND WHEREAS the development of a 1 ,073 unit subdivision on the Paradise Beach - Island Grove PSW would undermine the environmental sustainability of Georgina and the Lake Simcoe community;

AND WHEREAS the development of a 1 ,073 unit subdivision threatens the current and long-term health of Lake Simcoe;

AND WHEREAS the residents of Ward 3 and the broader community of the Town of Georgina have not been allowed to fully participate in the decision making process that will directly impact the health and quality of life in their community;

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Town of Georgina requests;

• The Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority exercise its mandate to conserve and protect the environmentally significant Paradise Beach - Island Grove lands for the future health of Lake Simcoe and its surrounding communities.

31


• The Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority decline to issue a section 28 permit on the Maple Lake Estates Property.

• And further, that the Council of the Town of Georgina hereby declares that should the Board of Directors of the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority issue a section 28 permit for the Maple Lake Estates lands, that the Town of Georgina will consider all of the options at its disposal which may include taking legal action.

A recorded vote was requested; the Deputy Clerk recorded the vote as follows;

YEA NAY Councillor Sebo x Regional Councillor Davison x Councillor Harding x Mayor Quirk x Councillor Neeson x Councillor Fellini x Councillor Biggerstaff x

YEA -7 NAY -0


(2) General Information Items

• Correspondence from Aird Berlis, legal counsel for North Gwillimbury Forest Alliance (NGFA), providing comments on LSRCA Staff Report No. 10-18-BOD.

• Correspondence from Phil Craig in opposition to the development of the North Gwillimbury Provincially Significant Wetland.

Correspondence from Councillor Dave Neeson providing his concerns with moving forward with the development of a subdivision on Provincially Significant Wetland .

• Notice of Motion submitted by Councillor Dave Neeson to conserve and protect the environmentally significant Paradise Beach - Island Grove lands.

• Loralea Carruthers in favour of protecting the North Gwillimbury Forest and Wetlands.

32


• Correspondence from Tom Sandler, local freelance photographer, referencing Robert Kennedy Jr, founder of Water Keepers Worldwide, and providing his photograph of an owl taken in the subject wetlands.

• Correspondence from 'Protect Our Water and Environmental Resources' (P.O.W.E.R.) in support of the preservation and protection of the environmentally significant Paradise Beach - Island Grove lands.



That the General Information items opposing the development of a 1,073 unit subdivision on the Paradise Beach - Island Grove provincially significant wetland, Maple Lake Estates lands, be received

Carried.



11 . PUBLIC MEETINGS None. (1) STATUTORY MEETING(S) UNDER THE PLANNING ACT OR MEETINGS

PERTAINING TO THE CONTINUATION OF PLANNING MATTERS (2) STATUTORY MEETING(S) UNDER OTHER LEGISLATION (3) OTHER PUBLIC MEETINGS

12. REPORTS None. (1) ADOPTION OF REPORTS NOT REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION (2) REPORTS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION

13. DISPOSITIONS/PROCLAMATIONS, GENERAL INFORMATION ITEMS AND COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT

(3) Committee of Adjustment Planning Matters None. (A) Under Review (B) Recommendations (C) Decisions

14. MOTIONS/NOTICES OF MOTION

15. REGIONAL BUSINESS None.

16. OTHER BUSINESS None.

17. BY-LAWS None.

33


18. CLOSED SESSION None. (1) Motion to move into closed session of Council (2) Motion to reconvene into open session of Council and report on matters

discussed in closed session.


Moved by Councillor Harding, Seconded by Councillor Biggerstaff

That the following by-law be approved:

(1) By-law No. 2018-0024 (COU-2), a by-law to confirm the proceedings of Special Council on March 22, 2018.

Carried.


Moved by Councillor Fellini, Seconded by Councillor Sebo

That the meeting adjourn at 8:25 p.m.

Carried.


Rachel Dillabough, Deputy Clerk

34

SUBJECT:


REPORT NO. DS-2018-0044

FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF COUNCIL APRIL 4, 2018

APPLICATION FOR ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT SIW DOVEDALE DRIVE & WOODBINE AVENUE, KESWICK JRAD INVESTMENTS INC. C/0 CHRIS STOYANOVICH

1. RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. That Council receive Report DS-2018-0044 prepared by the Planning Division, Development Services Department dated April 4, 2018 respecting an application to amend Zoning By-law 500 submitted by JRAD Investments Inc. for lands located at the southwest corner of Dovedale Drive and Woodbine Avenue in Keswick.

2. That Council approve the application to amend Zoning By-law 500 submitted by JRAD Investments Inc. for the lands located at the southwest corner of Dovedale Drive and Woodbine Avenue in Keswick described as Parts 62 and 65 Plan 65R-31761

3. That Council adopt a By-law to amend Zoning By-law No. 500 and that the By-law contain the site-specific provisions outlined in Report DS-2018-0044.

4. That pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990 C.P.13, as amended, in the event minor revisions are necessary respecting the proposed amending Zoning By-law, further notice shall not be required.

2. PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to provide Staff's recommendations on a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment to change the zoning on the property from site specific General Commercial (C1-34), which currently permits a bank only, to site specific Shopping Centre Commercial (C4-ZZ) to expand the permitted uses on the property. A Wendy's restaurant and mechanical garage are currently proposed for the site.

3. BACKGROUND:

OWNER/APPLICANT: JRAD Investments Inc.

35

- Page 2 of Report No. DS-2018-0044-

AGENT:

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:

FILE NUMBER:

Macaulay Shiomi Howson Ltd. c/o Chris Stoyanovich

(refer to Attachments 1 - 3) Part Lot 7, Concession 3 (NG) Parts 62 & 65, Plan 65R-31761 S/W Dovedale Drive and Woodbine Avenue Roll# 147-101

03.1118

3.1 SUBJECT LAND AND SURROUNDING LAND USES

The subject property is located on the south/west corner of Dovedale Drive and Woodbine Avenue in Keswick. The property is vacant. It is located to the north of the Keswick Marketplace plaza and is accessed via Dovedale Drive through a private access road.

Commercial uses surround the property on the north, west and south sides. The property directly to the west is currently vacant but zoned for commercial uses. The property to the east, which is designated in the Keswick Business Park Secondary Plan for future industrial uses, is currently being farmed (refer to Attachment 3).

Site Information KSP Designation Commercial/Employment Current Zoning C1-34 Proposed Zoning C4 (with site specific provisions) Location s/w Dovedale Dr. & Woodbine Ave. Lot Area 3,806 s_guare metres Frontage 27.71 metres on Woodbine Avenue

3.2 PREVIOUS PLANNING APPROVALS

Through a Zoning By-law Amendment application in 1996, the subject property was zoned General Commercial (C1-34), which restricted the permitted uses on the site to a bank only.

4. PROPOSAL:

For an overview of Staff's preliminary analysis of this proposal, please refer to the planning staff report dated December 13, 2017 and the minutes of the public meeting through the links below:

December 13, 2017 Council considered Report DS-2017-0144 • Link to the agenda (pages 13-48):

https://www.georgina.ca/sites/default/files/agendas-andminutes/2018/december 13 2017 continuous agenda.pdf

36

- Page 3 of Report No. DS-2018-0044 -

• Link to the minutes: https://www.georgina.ca/sites/defaultlfiles/agendas-andminutes/2018/december 13 2017 minutes.pdf

The minutes of the December 13, 2017 public meeting are also included as Attachment No. 4.

The subject application is to re-zone the property to a site specific Shopping Centre Commercial (C4-ZZ) zone to permit a range of commercial uses, as well as to provide relief from certain provisions of the C4 zone. The proposed use of the property is a Wendy's restaurant with drive thru and outdoor patio, as well as a future mechanical garage. A site plan showing the proposal is included as Attachment 5. An application for Site Plan Approval has also been submitted and is currently under review by Town staff and relevant agencies.

The amendment includes the following requests for relief:

Provision of By-Law Required/Permitted Permitted Use- Sec. 17.2 See Section 6.1

Number of Parking Spaces (Minimum) - 1 0 spaces per 95 Sec 5.28 (b) square metres of non-

residential floor area for a restaurant

Definition of Restaurant- Sec 2.168 "means a building where food, beverages or refreshments are prepared and offered for sale to the public for consumption. "

Front Yard Setback (Minimum) - Sec 8 metres 17.4 (c) Exterior Side Yard Setback (Minimum) 8 metres - Sec 17.4 (d) Interior Side Yard Setback (Minimum) - 8 metres Sec 17.4 (f)_ Rear Yard Setback (Minimum) - Sec 8 metres 17.4 (e) Height of Building (Maximum) - Sec 11 metres 17.4 (h) Width of Access Driveway (Minimum) - 7 metres Sec. 5.28 (i)

5. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND NOTICE REQUIREMENTS

5.1 PUBLIC CIRCULATION

Proposed See Section 6.1

5.5 spaces per 95 square metres of non-residential floor area for a restaurant

Adding: "but shall not include a dance hall, discoteque, dinner theatre, night club, or entertainment lounge but shall include an outdoor dining area/patio and take out drive thru feature." 5 metres

5 metres

3 metres

3 metres

15 metres

6 metres

37

-Page 4 of Report No. DS-2018-0044-

Pursuant to the provisions in the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, as amended, a Notice of Continuation of Public Meeting was mailed to all interested parties on March 15, 2018. The Notice was also posted on the Town's website on the Planning Division Public Notices webpage on March 16, 2018.

A public meeting under the Planning Act was held on December 13, 2017. No member of the public, apart from the applicant's consultant, spoke at the public meeting.

As of the finalization of this report, staff have received comment from Larry Regan (representing Craft Development Corporation; Keswick Marketplace Plaza): Emails dated October 27, 2017 and December 28, 2017. (Refer to Attachment 6). The issues in these e-mails are summarized below.

• Zoning

• The current zoning of the site for a bank was the basis for parking, heights, access related to the Keswick Marketplace site.

• The proposal would allow for the range of shopping centre uses including restaurants as proposed. Reducing the parking requirements for a restaurant on such a small parcel may not be sufficient particularly if another restaurant is proposed.

• The Shopping Centre zoning would provide for a height over 11 metres which is in excess of that required for the current proposed buildings which are in the 7 metre range. The Keswick Market Place development was based upon a design of smaller buildings in the front and larger buildings at the back of the site.

• Traffic

• The traffic study only deals with volumes not the impact of turning left into the centre and making an immediate left into the Wendy's including a drive thru lane or other retail use.

• The access road is the main entrance which is included under the ownership of the adjacent Dovedale land and for this reason and grading access from Dovedale Drive was never anticipated.

• The entrance alignment into Wendy's and the adjacent Dovedale lands should be aligned.

38

-Page 5 of Report No. DS-2018-0044-

• Easement Widening

• Any approval should be subject to this matter being resolved to the satisfaction of the Town, the Owner of the access road and the property owners benefitting from this easement.

The issues identified by Mr. Regan are addressed in Section 6.

5.2 EXTERNAL AGENCY AND TOWN DEPARTMENT COMMENTS

All comments received pertaining to the subject application can be found in the previous report DS- 2017-0144.

6. ANALYSIS:

An analysis of the proposal against applicable Provincial, Regional and Town planning documents can be found in Report DS-2017-0144.

6.1 ZONING BY-LAW

A copy of the draft ZBA is included as Attachment 7.

The subject property is zoned site specific General Commercial (C1-34) on Map 2, page 2, to Schedule 'A' of Zoning By-law 500. A bank is the only permitted use on the site.

The applicant proposes to re-zone the property to a site-specific Shopping Centre Commercial (C4-ZZ) zone. Both the Keswick Marketplace plaza and the commercial plaza to the north are zoned site specific Shopping Centre Commercial (C4-8 and C4-7, respectively). Further, many provisions of the proposed amending by-law are the same as those within the site-specific by-law for the Keswick Marketplace plaza, which is adjacent to the subject property.

An outline of the proposed amendment is provided below under balded point form headings.

• To permit the range of uses that are permitted in the C4 zone, with some exceptions.

The current proposal is for a Wendy's restaurant and mechanical garage. However, the proposed zoning by-law seeks a range of permitted uses to accommodate the long- term development of the site. These are shown under the C4-ZZ column and are contrasted with the permitted use list in the C4 zone. The proposed uses that are not otherwise permitted in the C4 zone are shown in italics.

39


C4 Zone Permitted Uses Proposed Uses (C4-ZZ) Bank Bank Bakery or bakeshop Bakery or bakeshop Bowling alley Building supply and equipment

establishment Business or professional office use Business or professional office use Catering establishment Catering establishment Church Clinic, health care Clinic, health care Club, commercial or private Clinic, veterinary (animal hospital),

but not including outdoor canine runs or animal containment areas

Dry cleaning establishment Hawker or pedlar use Hotel Garage, Mechanical Golf course miniature Laundromat Laundromat Motel or motor hotel Motor vehicle fuel bar Place of amusement Parking Lot, Commercial Police station Printing shop Refreshment vehicle, bicycle unit or cart Restaurant Restaurant Retail store Retail store Retail store, supermarket School, Private or Commercial Service shop, personal or light Service shop, personal or light Studio Studio Tourist information centre Tourist information centre Taxi stand Theatre wholesale establishment within a wholesale establishment within a building of which at least 25% is used building of which at least 25% is for retail sales used for retail sales accessory buildings, structures accessory buildings, structures and uses to any permitted use and uses to any permitted use

The range of proposed uses is considered appropriate for the subject site.

• To permit 5.5 parking spaces per 95 square metres of non-residential floor area for a restaurant, whereas 1 0 spaces per 95 square metres of non-residential floor area for a restaurant is required.

40


The proposal is for a Wendy's restaurant and a future mechanical garage. Pursuant to Section 5.28 (b) of Zoning By-law 500, 10 parking spaces are required per 95 square metres of non-residential floor area for a restaurant. 3.5 spaces per 95 square metres of non-residential floor area are required for a mechanical garage if the parking demands are considered individually. As per the Town's Accessible Parking Standards By-law 2010-0008, the site would require 2 of these spaces to be barrier free. Two barrier free spaces are shown on the site plan.

There is no relief requested with respect to the required parking for a mechanical garage, which at 206.4 square metres, would require 8 parking spaces. Note: The applicant has advised that there will be a reduction in the proposed size of the mechanical garage as it proceeds in future through the site plan approval process.

With a non-residential floor area of 233.2 square metres for the restaurant, 10 spaces per 95 square metres would equate to a requirement of 25 parking spaces (for a total of 33 parking spaces on the site). The applicant is requesting that the parking requirement for a restaurant be reduced to 5.5 parking spaces per 95 square metres of non residential floor area, which would result in 14 required spaces (for a total of 22 required parking spaces on the site).

As shown on the site plan, 31 parking spaces (two of which are barrier free) are currently proposed.

According to Zoning By-law 500, the zoning prov1s1ons for the Keswick Marketplace plaza, as well as the commercial plaza to the north of the property, both require 5.5 spaces per 95 square metres of non-residential floor area. In that regard, the application is proposing the zoning standards in line with the adjacent commercial sites. The shopping centre zoning is based upon an approach which blends the overall parking demands of retail, office and service uses with the more intensive requirements associated with restaurants.

While the subject site would generally function as part of the Keswick Marketplace development it is under separate ownership and is located on the northwestern periphery of the plaza and outside of the shared parking areas for multiple uses that exists to the south and west. Accordingly, should the site develop completely for restaurant uses the overall shopping centre parking requirement of 5.5 spaces per 95 square metres may be insufficient. On that basis, an overall cap of 280 square metres (3,014 sq. ft.} for restaurant uses is recommended. This accommodates the current Wendy's restaurant and associated patio areas that are included in the calculation of gross floor area while preventing additional restaurant uses on the site ..

• To permit outdoor patio/dining areas.

As part of the Wendy's restaurant concept, the applicant is proposing an outdoor seating area that would accommodate three tables. The current definition of restaurant in Zoning By-law 500 does not include the provision of outdoor dining

41

- Page 8 of Report No. DS-2018-0044-

areas. The site specific zoning for the remainder of the Keswick Marketplace plaza permits outdoor dining areas and is considered appropriate for the current site as proposed.

• To permit a minimum front yard and exterior side yard setback of 5 metres, as well as a rear and interior side yard setback of 3 metres, whereas an 8 metre minimum setback is required for all yards.

As shown on the proposed site plan (refer to Attachment 5), the two proposed buildings meet the 8 metre setback required for all yards1 with the exception of the interior side yard setback for the restaurant, which is shown to be 5.8 metres.

The applicant's agent has advised staff that the request for reduced setback requirements that are not necessarily tied to the current proposal are to address future development potential of the site. Staff note, and the same has been highlighted by the applica.nt in the Planning Justification Report, that the proposed setbacks are the same as those that are permitted for the remainder of the Keswick Marketplace plaza.

Staff concur with the overall logic of the proposed setbacks which would be consistent with the Keswick Marketplace development.

• To permit a maximum building height of 15 metres, whereas a maximum height of 11 metres is currently permitted.

The increased maximum height of 15 metres is the same that is permitted for the remainder of the Keswick Marketplace plaza. Staff have considered the comments from Mr. Regan concerning the design philosophy of the Keswick Marketplace site. This development is largely based upon the location of the Wai-Mart department store anchoring the site along the western edge with supporting retail and service commercial uses transitioning easterly to Woodbine Avenue. The Keswick Market Place Urban Design Report dated December 2004 prepared by the Office for Urbanism forms the basis for the approved site plan of development. This report establishes that the site be developed with building heights no higher than 15 metres (4 storeys) or 22 metres ( 6 storeys) for mixed use or stand alone office buildings.

The range of proposed uses are considered appropriate for the subject site and allowing for a maximum height consistent with the adjacent Keswick Marketplace development at 15 metres is considered appropriate. Despite this, owing to the concerns raised by Craft Development Corporation ( Keswick Market Place ) the applicant has agreed not to further request an increase in height to 15 metres and on that basis the recommended zoning by-law would allow for a height of 11 metres which is consistent with the proposed C-4 Shopping Centre zoning provisions and

1 The site plan shows a 13.3 metre front yard setback, 9.7 metre exterior side yard setback, 11.7 metre rear yard setback and a 5.8 metre interior side yard setback.

42


the existing site specific C 1-34 zoning on the site. Attachment 8 shows the proposed elevations.

• To permit a driveway aisle with a minimum width of 6 metres, whereas a minimum of 7 metres is required.

As shown on the site plan, the minimum width of the driveway aisle is 6 metres. As per the submitted Traffic Management and Site Circulation Plan submitted in support of the Site Plan Approval application, analysis was completed showing the movements and turning radius of a garbage truck as well as a fire truck on the site. Development Engineering and Fire Department staff have reviewed this matter and advised of no objections

6.2 TRAFFIC

In support of the subject proposal the applicant has submitted Traffic and Access Review reports by Lea Consulting Ltd dated December 11, 2017 and March 12, 2018. (Refer to Attachment 9) The Traffic and Access Reports include full intersection analysis of all turning movements in and out of the site. All movements at both intersections are forecasted to operate within capacity and with acceptable delay following the development of the subject site. The reports establish that the queue length for cars waiting to turn left into the subject site from the access road are expected to be minimal and as such it is unlikely that cars waiting to turn left into the subject site will create any blockage of the Dovedale Drive intersection.

With respect to the drive thru, the reports conclude that the drive thru can accommodate 7 vehicles, as required by the Town's Zoning By-law and has the capacity for an additional 3 vehicles for a total of 10. The report concludes that overspill from the drive thru into the site driveway should not be of concern.

The report also addresses the alignment of the driveway from the adjacent property on the south side of Dovedale Drive. This site is currently proposed for use as a car wash (Halo Car Wash) and is under Site Plan Control review. The southern driveway from the car wash site to the central driveway into the Keswick Marketplace will align with the driveway into the subject site.

Staff have reviewed the Traffic and Access reports submitted in support of the applications and are generally satisfied with the analysis and conclusions.

6.3 DRIVEWAY EASEMENT

As part of the site plan approval for the proposed site the applicant will be required to widen the central driveway into the Keswick Market Place by a width of one metre. The site plan approval process for the "Halo" car wash development located on the western side of the northerly entrance driveway into the Keswick Marketplace is currently underway. As part of this process, Staff will be

43


recommending the widening of the entrance driveway into the Keswick Marketplace by an additional one metre from the car wash site. This would expand the overall width of the driveway in this location to 8 metres from 6 metres currently. Adjustments to the driveway easements in this location will be recommended as a condition of site plan approval for each respective development. The widening of the entrance driveway in this location will facilitate better turning radii at Dovedale Drive and allow for better unimpeded traffic flow along the driveway if and when cars are queued for turning movements.

Staff have considered the input from Mr. Larry Regan on behalf of the Development Corporation for the Keswick Market Place and believe that onbalance that the issues raised have been reasonably addressed

7. FINANCIAL AND BUDGETARY IMPACT:

There are no financial concerns or budgetary impacts on the Town as a result of this application. Prior to any site alteration or development, the applicant will be required to apply for and obtain all necessary approvals, building permits, pay development charges and all applicable fees. A Site Plan Control application has been submitted and is being processed.

6. CONCLUSION:

Staff are satisfied that all of the concerns raised have been adequately addressed. In this respect, staff are of the opinion that the proposal is consistent with provincial policies, conforms to the Town and Region Official Plans, is appropriate and represents good planning.

In conclusion, Staff recommend Council's approval of the application and should Council approve the application, staff have prepared the amending by-law for passing.

44


Prepared by:

~P. ~ Supervisor of Development Planning

Harold . Lenters, M.Sc.PI, MCIP, RPP Director of Development Services

4 April2018

Attachment 1 - Context Map Attachment 2 - Key Map Attachment 3 - Aerial Map Attachment 4 - Public Meeting Minutes Attachment 5 - Site Plan Attachment 6 - E-mail comments Keswick Marketplace Attachment 7- Proposed Zoning By-law Attachment 8 - Elevation Drawings Attachment 9 - Site Traffic Analysis

Reviewed by:

V~et L. Ross, MCIP, RPP Manager of Planning

Approved by:

Wina~B~~CT, CEMC Chief Administrative Officer

45

Cook Bay

SUBJECT PROPERTY

<..3Fox Island

A L=J

l&End G"-""

Lake Simcoe

to. OoclooPolnt

r ~ " -- ~

I

Legend

I.A"ti...IK+~U::u:»IUII

1cial Highway 'ro Co<ri<b n_ru IV ""'eo"""' o 1 2 IKJI""'"""' -+-

o w ·- :::J Secondary Plan Area 8

....,::::~0 -:~-----~-·

n 0 z -1 m )( -1 s )> -o

46

--- ---- - --

/

I r~----------·~e~n~w~o=oms~venue J~ 1----------=-.:.""-------=--=-.;.__;----;rl;::::::;----;:= r-1::::;--r= 1 ===;-

1 ---..

1 ------.

1 M Report# DS-2018-0044

I LJ LJ · · etres Attachment 2 0 45 90 180 270 360 Pages 1 of 1

~-------------------------------~~~'--~~

47

AERIAL PHOTO 48

December 13, 2017 M 4 2017-12-13

(2) REPORTS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION

Report from the Fire and Rescue Services Department:

(A) Station 1-8 Design and Rebuild Options

Report No. FRS-2017-0009

Paul Mcintosh, Thomas Brown Architects Inc, provided summary of the two design and rebuild options for Station 1-8 to illustrate t scope of the projects; one design retains the church while the other does not dvising that the benefit to incorporating the church in the design is the 3,000 s are feet of useable space in good condition, which would cost a million dollar o rebuild. A sloped roof was considered but not chosen .

Ron J. Staff was requested to consider providing ace for a Level 3 Electric Vehicle Charging Station in the design of the new re hall, and to seek provincial funding for similar recharge stations in 2018 or potential incorporation into future developments within the Town bound es.

Ron J.

Moved by Councillor Harding, Sec ded by Regional Councillor Davison

1. That Council receive eport No. FRS-2017-0009 prepared by the Fire & Rescue Services 0 partment dated December 13, 2017 respecting design options for the ne Pefferlaw Station 1-8 fire hall.

2. That Option 1 ttachment #1, be the chosen option for the design and rebuild of the new ire station which will maintain the historical Cooke's United Church/P erlaw Youth Centre.

Carried.

Chief J nkins advised that the current fire hall will need to be demolished, the fire truck will be relocated within the Pefferlaw area and construction on the new de · n may commence in July of 2018 with construction expected to take place o r a twelve to fourteen month period .

11. PUBLIC MEETINGS

(1) STATUTORY MEETING(S) UNDER THE PLANNING ACT OR MEETINGS PERTAINING TO THE CONTINUATION OF PLANNING MATTERS

(8:01 p.m.) (A) Application for Zoning By-law Amendment

JRAD INVESTMENTS INC. c/o Chris Stoyanovich Part Lot 7, Concession 3 (NG), Part 62 & 65, Plan 65R-31761, s/w Dovedale Drive and Woodbine Avenue

Report# DS-2018-0044 Attachment 4 Pages 1 of 3

49

December 13, 2017 M 5 2017-12-13

AGENT: MacAulay Shiomi Howson Ltd. c/o Chris Stoyanovich


Mayor Quirk explained the procedure for a public meeting.

Chris Stoyanovich, Agent for the applicant; •applicant is a Wendy's franchisee, has over 20 Wendy's restaurants and is proposing another on the subject property, along with a future building •subject site is approximately 40,000 square feet or 3,800 square metres and historically owned by the Bank of Montreal for many years, obtaining C1 zoning permitting strictly a bank; plans changed and the applicant purchased the property two years ago •under the bank ownership, easements were obtained over the access road off of Dovedale Drive along the west property line into the Keswick Marketplace and is shared between the landowners •the C1 zoning use is restrictive for any other purchaser; the applicant has applied to change the zoning to C4 to bring the parcel into conformity with the Official Plan and C4 zoning of the Keswick Marketplace and other properties in the area •proposal is in conformity with other uses in the area •restaurant approximately 233 square metres or 2,500 square feet with outdoor seating area and drive-through along south side of property •if a tenant is secured for the second future building, will require submission of a site plan application amendment •elevation drawings and details reviewed •C4 zoning is consistent with zoning on surrounding properties, specifically allowing an outdoor patio •suggested to the Town Planner we some amendments can be eliminated; a) width of access driveway, town requires 7 metres and that can be accommodated; b) can revert back from 15 metre building height to the Town standard of 11 metres; c) can accommodate the Town's standard side yard and rear yard setbacks of 8 metres, but reductions to 5 and 3 metres respectively would provide more flexibility for future building #2; d) instead of 10 parking spaces per 95 square metres, the applicant is requesting 5.5 parking spaces per 95 square metres given that the business will not open until 1 O:OOam and simply will not require 10 parking spaces per 95 square metres

Maryann Hunt, Planner; •the suggested zoning provisions would be bringing the subject property in line with what is already permitted on the Keswick Marketplace to the south and the plaza to the north; as the property is located within the Keswick market place plaza, it is appropriate to assess what zoning provisions could be appropriate for this site; some of the provisions are what is permitted for the Keswick Marketplace •site plan application has been submitted concurrently; if application approved, staff will not bring back the zoning bylaw amendment until further along in the site plan process •no concerns received from any circulated agency or department

Report # DS-2018-0044 Attachment 4 Pages 2 of 3

50

December 13, 2017 M 6 2017-12-13

Harold L.

•two comments received from Larry Regan of Craft Development Corp, the developer of Keswick Marketplace plaza; respecting the access point for the site off of Dovedale Drive, as well as the difference in trip generations •applicant submitted traffic access and review plan that reviewed the access point and trip generation; report suggested it is within industry standards and is appropriate but is being reviewed •Larry Ducher representing a carwash immediately west of subject land respecting the narrowness of the access point off Dovedale Drive into the plaza. Engineering staff will address the need to widen that access point. •staff will review all comments received and return with a recommendation report and continue with the site plan process

Chris Stoyanovich; •architects advised that the restaurant will be 24 feet at its highest point, therefore the 11 metre height regulation in the bylaw is more than acceptable and can easily be accommodated •applicant is more than willing to dedicate or create an additional 1 metre width access road through discussions with Town engineering staff

Moved by Councillor Biggerstaff, Seconded by Regional Councillor Davison

RESOLUTION NO. C-2017 -0655

Maryann H. 1. That Council receive Report DS-2017-0144 prepared by the Planning Division, Development Services Department dated December 13, 2017 respecting an application to amend Zoning By-law 500 submitted by JRAD Investments Inc. for lands located at the south west corner of Dovedale Drive and Woodbine Avenue in Keswick.

2 That staff report further to Council following the receipt and assessment of the public and Council's comments.

3 That staff provide written notice of the next public meeting, a minimum of two weeks in advance of the date of this meeting, to the following:

i. Any person or public body that has requested to be notified of any future public meeting(s); and,

ii. Any person or public body that has requested to be notified of Council's decision regarding the approval or refusal of the subject application.

Carried.


51

52

From: Larry Regan [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: December-28-17 2:34PM To: Chris Stoyanovich <[email protected]>; Bryan Sloss <[email protected] >; Larry Duchscher <[email protected]>; Maryann Hunt <[email protected]> Cc: 'Beneventi, Ernie' <Ernie [email protected]>; Michael Baskerville <[email protected] >; Darren Dunphy <[email protected]>; Shirlena Lau <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Wendy's Rezoning Woodbine Dovedale

Chris, thank you again for keeping us in the loop. I have spoken to both the owners of the adjacent Dovedale lands and the owner's of the retail buildings along Woodbine and we are all not clear on some of the answers addressed at the council meeting and the report provided. I would like to address these formally through council and to you direct, as it is not our intent to stop this development, but to have good development practices, as it impacts all the parties of the development. I have not spoken to Walmart and/or Riomor who both have rights under the existing access easement (REOA), but I have kept them in the loop.

Dear council, on behalf of the owners of the properties adjacent to the Proposed Wendy's development, we would like to highlight the following items which we feel have not been fully dealt with, including:

1. Zoning: The current zoning of the corner (for a bank) was the basis for parking, heights, limited access and other matters related to this property as it relates to Keswick Marketplace. PILES, the original developer, included full zoning on the adjacent vacant Dovedale parcel under the assumption the corner would be a bank. I trust the City understand that rezoning a 1 acre parcel to a shopping centre zoning designation, could include many permitted uses (the application cannot be considered on the basis of a Wendy's and a Lube shop). These uses could change to any SC permitted use, at any time. A restaurant of any kind requires excessive parking for peak periods. Reducing the parking requirements for a restaurant on such a small parcel may not be sufficient and further down the road there could be a second restaurant which would create the potential for parking and traffic related issues for the adjacent parcels. The SC zoning would also include a height of over 11m, while Wendy's does not propose to be more than 7+ metres, then next bldg could be ll+m which would not be consistent for the centre. Keswick Marketplace was designed with higher buildings at the back and lower at the front, for obvious reasons.

2. Traffic: The traffic report was provided at the meeting, which I am not sure if the Town has had the opportunity to review, or peer review. This report deals with the theoretical use of a restaurant and lube shop, again, the second use is unknown as well as the use for the adjacent Dovedale parcel being unknown. Further, it only deals with volumes, not the impact of turning left into the centre and making an immediate left into the Wendy's development, including a drive thru lane and/or another retail use. Cars stopping and waiting for traffic or deciding to turn left or right could compound the issue getting into Keswick Marketplace off Dovedale. Again, with the current bank use and the adjacent Dovedale lands being a second non-restaurant use (this property is restricted from doing a restaurant), there would likely not be a concern. This access road is the main entrance, which is included under the ownership of the adjacent Dovedale land, and for this reason and grading, access off of Dovedale was never anticipated. Further, the entrance alignment into Wendy's and the adjacent Dovedale lands, should be aligned and as of today it is not known if the alignment will be practical as proposed or if it will work for the development of the Dovedale lands. If not aligned, this could create a second entrance (right turn) shortly after the proposed Wendy's entrance (left turn).


53

3. Easement widening: any approval should be subject to this matter being resolved to the satisfaction of the Town, the Owner of the access road and the property owners benefiting from this easement.

At this point we are not sure of the Town's position on these matters, and offer these comments as consideration as the move forward with any decision for rezoning. In the meantime, should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.

Many thanks,

Notice of Confidentiality:

Larry Regan CRAFT Development Corporation 10 Queen Elizabeth Blvd, Unit #2, Toronto, ON MBZ 1L8 Direct 416.204.0730 Ofc 416.979.9996 ext 360 [email protected] craftdevelopment.ca

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review re-transmission dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error please contact the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission including all attachments without copying distributing or disclosing same.


54

Maryann Hunt

From: Larry Regan @ m> Sent: October-27-17 3:51PM To: Cc: Subject:

Chris Stoyanovich; Bryan Sloss; Larry Duchscher; Shirlena Lau 'Beneventi, Ernie'; Michael Baskerville; Darren Dunphy; Maryann Hunt RE: Wendy's Rezoning Woodbine Dovedale

Attachments: 18131- Wendy's Dovedale Traffic Management Plan.pdf

Importance: High

Thank you Chris, please keep me in the loop as you work through these items and get input from the adjacent owners.

The construction and use of this access road is important to the adjacent owners (see the owner's contacts, Bryan & Larry, included in this email), as well as CRAFT/PILES and the other Keswick Marketplace owners. Having this entrance, not bottleneck access to the respective Dovedale parcels and the Keswick Marketplace is critical, and in all our best interests.

Other than the initial notice, this is the first information I have seen and after a quick look at the attached report, I have highlighted a few questions/notes below; -it is a quick left into the site, from Dovedale; -it does not take into account the potential access to the Dovedale parcel to the west; -there is no traffic volume consideration, the change from a bank to a restaurant and second retail or restaurant use (worst case), is significant.

On another note, and I do not have an answer, but the access road off of Dovedale is part of the Dovedale Property to the East, with an easement for the benefit of all of Keswick marketplace. I am not sure what is required to facilitate this widening.

Shirlena, if you can pass this on to Rio-Can, so they are in the loop as far as the Wai-Mart property, as I do not have a contact there.

Many thanks,

Larry Regan CRAFT Development Corporation 10 Queen Elizabeth Blvd, Unit #2, Toronto, ON MSZ lLS Direct ___________ _

2 7 n craftdeye!opment.ca

Notice of Confidentiality: The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review re-transmission dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error please contact the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission including all attachments without copying distributing or disclosing same.

From: Chris Stoyanovich [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: October 27, 2017 2:02PM To: Larry Regan > Cc: 'Beneventi, Ernie' <[email protected]>; 'Michael Baskerville' <[email protected]>; 'Darren Dunphy' <[email protected]>; 'Maryann Hunt' <[email protected]> Subject: Wendy's Rezoning Woodbine Dovedale

1


55

Hi Larry: Further to my call to you and our telephone conversation, please find the attached Lea Consulting Traffic Management Plan and On-Site Circulation Study that was requested as part of our site plan submission for the proposed Wendy's development.

As I indicated to you, the Town Engineering staff requested that our client dedicate 1.0 m of land to widen the access road off of Dovedale as well as provide sidewalks and curbs as part oftheir development for a proposed new Wendy's restaurant.

The site plan drawings (a copy of which was attached to the Town's Zoning Amendment Notice) includes the 1.0 m widening off our client's landholding, and the installation of curbs and sidewalks as requested by Town staff.

As discussed, if you can provide me with the name and contact info for the owners ofthe vacant parcel to the west of our clients lands we will arrange to speak to them as well.

If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me as we would like to ensure that adjacent land owners understand and can support our client's application to rezone the subject property.

Thank you Chris

Chris Stoyanovich, MCIP, RPP Senior Associate Macaulay Shiomi Howson Ltd.

E [email protected] T 416.487.4101 x305 F 416.487.5489 c 647.525.9335

MSH

600 Annette Street Toronto, Ontario M6S 2C4 Canada

2


56

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA IN THE

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK

BY-LAW NUMBER 500-2018- __ _

A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW NUMBER 500, BEING A BY-LAW TO REGULATE

THE USE OF LANDS AND THE CHARACTER, LOCATION AND USE OF BUILDINGS

AND STRUCTURES WITHIN THE TOWN OF GEORGINA.

Pursuant to Section 34 of the Planning Act, RSO., 1990, the Council of the Town of

Georgina ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. That Map 2, Schedule 'A' to Zoning By-law Number 500 as amended, is hereby

further amended by changing the zone symbol from 'C 1-34' to 'C4-11' on lands

described as Part of Lot 7, Concession 3 (NG), being Parts 62 and 69, on Plan

65R-31761, shown in heavy outline and designated 'C4-11' on Schedule 'A'

attached hereto.

2. That Section 17.5 SPECIAL PROVISIONS of Zoning By-law Number 500 as

amended, is hereafter further amended by adding after Subsection 17.5.8., the

following:

"17.5.9 PART OF LOTS 7 CONCESSION 3 (NG) PARTS 62 & 69, PLAN 65R-31761

'C4-11' (Map 2)

Nothwithstanding Section 17.2, on lands shown in heavy outline and designated

'C4-11' on Schedule 'A' attached hereto, only the following non-residential uses

shall be permitted:

- bakery or bakeshop

-bank

- business or professional office

- catering establishment

- clinic, healthcare Report# DS-2018-0044

Attachment ·r Pages 1 of 4

57

- clinic, veterinary (animal hospital), but not including outdoor canine runs or

animal containment areas

- laundromat

- parking lot, commercial

- garage, mechanical

-building supply and equipment establishment

- restaurant

- retail store

- service shop, personal or light

- school, private or commercial

-studio

-tourist information centre

- wholesale establishment within a building of which at least 25% is used for retail

sales

-accessory buildings, structures, and uses to any permitted use

The following provisions shall apply to those lands shown in heavy outline and designated

'C4-11' on Schedule 'A' attached hereto:

a) Notwithstanding Sections 2.55, 2.108, 2.168, 2.191, 5.28(b) and (i) and Section

13, the following provisions shall apply:

• Access to and from a parking area may be provided by means of an

unobstructed driveway connected to an access street or road pursuant to

Section 2.192. The maximum width of the driveway, shall be in accordance

with an approved site plan.

• The definition of a restaurant shall be as follows: "RESTAURANT: means

a building where food, beverages or refreshments are prepared and offered

for sale to the public for consumption, but shall not include a dance hall,

discoteque, dinner theatre, night club or entertainment lounge but shall

include an outdoor dining area/patio and take out drive thru feature."

• The minimum number of parking spaces for a restaurant shall be 5.5 spaces

per 95 square metres of gross floor area. Report# DS-2018-0044

Attachment 7 Pages 2 of 4

58

• A mechanical garage shall be subject to the provisions established for the

'C4-11' zone and not Section 13.

b) Notwithstanding Section 2.82, 'floor area, non-residential' shall be defined to mean

"the total floor area of a non-residential building, including a basement, or cellar

area designed or used for non-residential purposes, but excluding any utility room,

washroom, janitorial closet, stairwell, hallway, permanent stock room, staff lunch

room, indoor loading area receiving vestibule, indoor garage storage vestibule, and

accessory office space", for the purpose of calculating parking requirements.

c) Notwithstanding any provision of this By-law to the contrary the maximum gross

floor area of restaurant uses shall not exceed 280 square metres

d) Notwithstanding Sections 17.4(c), (d) and (e), the following shall apply:

YARD ABUTTING WOODBINE AVENUE (MINIMUM) 5 metres

YARD ABUTTING DOVEDALE DRIVE (MINIMUM) 5 metres

ALL OTHER YARDS 3 metres

READ a first, second and third time and finally passed this_ day of ____ , 2018.

Mayor

Town Clerk


59

PART LOT 7 CONCESSION 3 (NG) THIS IS SCHEDULE 'A' TO REGISTERED PLAN 65R-31761, PARTS 62, 69 AND 71 TOWN OF GEORGINA BY-LAW 500 - 2018 - (PL-5)

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK

FORMERLY TOWNSHIP OF NORTH GWILLIMBURY COUNTY OF YORK

Dovedale Drive

'C4-11'

PASSED THIS'---_DAY OF

------- 2018

CLERK

MAYOR

(1) :J c: ~

<( (1) c: ·-..0

"0 0

~

lV

SCHEDULE 'A' TO BY- LAW, 500-2018-

fl_Jl_J I I I Metres

(PL-5) ~ Report# DS-2018-0044

Attachment 7 Pages 4 of 4

0 1 0 20 40 60 80

60

DOVEDALE DR. & WOODBINE AVE. KESWICK, ONTARIO

lOCI!,.;::;,

l<l-~1"'

EXTERIOR FINISt-ES LEGEND

NOTE: REFER TOSI-IEETA61 FORSI'ECIACATIOHS OF~ LIA.TERIAL.S AND FINISIES

@!)

~ ~

(]IT)

(ill

@)

~~:'t:nl.l (ClEAR.AlUMIN.JM)

NICHIHA VIHTAGE WOOD (CeDAR)

NICHIHAARCHITECTIJRAL PANB.. (llll .. IINA'TJON BlAZE)

NICH""-AARal~P.ANa. (IllUMINATION KNIGHT'SAAJIIOR)

1~ LON·E INSIA.ATBHii.ASS

METAL Tl'lMJIHD B~METALCQ.£AA ALU'-'INUM)

PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SEPT 2017

61

LEt\< )

.... . '

March 12, 2018

Chris Stoyanovich, MCIP, RPP Senior Associate Macaulay Shiomi Howson Ltd. 600 Annette Street Toronto, ON

M652C4

RE: Proposed Wendy's and Quick-Lube Development-Dovedale Drive:

Responses to Traffic Concerns

Dear Chris Stoyanovich,

LEA Consulting Ltd. 625 Cochrane Drive, 9th Floor

Markham, ON, l3R 9R9 Canada

T I 905 470 0015 F I 905 470 0030

Our Ref. 18131/200

Following the completion of the Traffic and Access Review by LEA Consulting Ltd., dated December 11, 2017, it is understood that further concerns have been expressed by the neighbouring property with respect to potential traffic operations issues that may result from development of the proposed Wendy's restaurant and quick-lube establishment on Dovedale Drive. This letter has been prepared to respond to these comments and concerns to provide further information and to help demonstrate that the proposal for the subject site will introduce an acceptable traffic impact.

TRAFFIC CONCERNS This letter will proceed by outlining the comments and concerns received along with the accompanying response to those comments or concerns. It is understood that the following points have been raised in response to the Traffic Review Letter prepared December 11, 2017:

1. The report involves the theoretical use of a restaurant and lube shop. The second use on-site is unknown as well as the use for the adjacent Dovedale parcel being unknown.

2. The report only deals with volumes and not the impact ofturning left into the centre and making an immediate left Into the Wendy's development, including a drive thru lane and/or another retail use.

3. Cars stopping and waiting for traffic or deciding to turn left or right could compound traffic issues getting into Keswick Marketplace from Dovedale. With the current bank use and the adjacent Dovedale lands being a second non-restaurant use, there would likely not be a concern.

4. The access road is the main entrance, which is included under the ownership of the adjacent Dovedale land, and for this reason and grading, access off of Dovedale was never anticipated. Further, the entrance alignment into Wendy's and the adjacent Dovedale lands, should be aligned and as of today it is not known if the alignment will be practical as proposed or if it will work for the development of the Dovedale lands. If not aligned, this could create a second entrance (right-turn) shortly after the proposed Wendy's entrance (left-turn).

LEA's responses to the abovementioned comments and concerns are detailed below:

1. It is understood that through the rezoning exercise the subject site will be restricted to provide only one (1) restaurant, and therefore the second building on-site will be prohibited from being a second restaurant use. This will ensure another potential high-generator of traffic will not be developed on-site. It is further

WW\AI I 1- /\.( 1\


62

understood that the rezoning application is being submitted on behalf of Wendy's while a quick-lube establishment is being secured as the tenant of the second building on-site. The resulting traffic generation of the Wendy's and quick-lube establishment has been found to be acceptable through the intersection capacity analysis conducted summarized in Table 3 and Table 4 in the Traffic and Access Review dated December 11, 2017. Also, in the traffic analyses completed in the Traffic and Access Review, the adjacent Dovedale parcel was accounted for in the analysis and was assumed to generate the same amount of traffic as the subject site. This was assumed to ensure that a conservative amount of traffic has been accounted for of the adjacent property in the results, and that the study was comprehensive in accounting for other future potential generators of traffic in the area.

2. The Traffic and Access Review dated December 11, 2017 included intersection capacity analyses of the entry intersection into Keswick Marketplace from Dovedale Drive, along with the driveway intersection into the subject site on the access road. The intersection capacity analyses forecasted future traffic operations including delay, vehicle-to-capacity ratio, and queueing. These intersection capacity analyses included the existing traffic, new traffic generated by the subject site turning left into onto the Keswick Marketplace access road from Dovedale Drive, as well as new traffic subsequently turning left into the subject site from the access road. Under a second sensitivity scenario, traffic as generated by the adjacent Dovedale property was also added to the future traffic analyses. The intersection capacity analyses results reveal acceptable future traffic operations as shown in Table 3 and Table 4 (sensitivity scenario) of the Traffic and Access Review. All movements at both intersections are forecasted to operate within capacity and with acceptable delay following the development of the subject site as proposed, and assuming the adjacent Dovedale property generates comparable traffic.

3. As demonstrated in the Traffic and Access Review dated December 11, 2017, the subject site as proposed is anticipated to generate only slightly more traffic versus a bank use during the weekday PM peak hour, and less traffic versus a bank during the Saturday peak hour. As such, comparable traffic operations are expected in the area given either the proposed development or a bank occupy the site. It is important to note that cars queueing waiting to turn left into the subject site from the access road are expected to be minimal as shown under the conservative scenario results in Table 4 in the Traffic and Access Review (less than one car-length under peak conditions). Therefore, it is unlikely that cars waiting to turn left into the subject site will create any blockage of the Dovedale Drive intersection . With respect to the drive-thru, it is understood that the drive-thru for the Wendy's restaurant is proposed to accommodate 7 vehicles, which satisfies the Town's Zoning By-Law. It is further understood that if determined to be advantageous, the drive-thru may be designed to accommodate up to 10 vehicles. Therefore, overspill from the drive-thru into the site's driveway which would subsequently cause traffic blockages on the access road and Dovedale Drive should not be of concern.

4. It is expected that it would be preferred if the adjacent Dovedale property aligns its future site driveway with the subject site. If this is the case, the Traffic and Access Review dated December 11, 2017 has forecasted acceptable traffic operations of this intersection as per Table 4. All approaches are forecasted to operate with level of service Cor better, and minimal queueing. It is important to identify that the adjacent Dovedale property has numerous options with respect to gaining site access. Dovedale Drive, which may not be the intended access location, is only one of those options. The adjacent Dovedale property could also gain access along its southern or western frontages at the other existing driveways, in addition to the access road studied as part ofTraffic and Access Review. The driveway was assumed to be aligned with the subject site as a conservative analysis to demonstrate that acceptable traffic operations can be anticipated if this option, whether desirable or not, is pursued.

Pagel2 WWW .LEA.C/\


63

This response letter had been completed to provide additional information and clarification on the results of the Traffic and Access Review, dated December 11, 2017 as it relates to future traffic operations of Dovedale Drive and the Keswick Marketplace access road intersection. The study found acceptable traffic operations are anticipated given the subject site is developed as proposed, and assuming the adjacent Dovedale property generates a similar amount of site traffic.

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 470-0015 extension 313 or at [email protected].

Yours truly,

LEA CONSULTING LTD.

Paul Grove, M.PI. Transportation Planner

Kenneth Chan, P.Eng., PTOE, PMP Vice President Head of Transportation Engineering

End: Appendix A- Traffic and Access Review, December 11, 2017

Page 13 W\11/\11/ LE/\.C/\


64

APPENDIX A

Traffic and Access Review, December 11, 2017


65

December 11, 2017

Chris Stoyanovich, MCIP, RPP Senior Associate Macaulay Shiomi Howson Ltd. 600 Annette Street Toronto, ON M6S2C4

LEA Consulting Ltd. 625 Cochrane Drive, 91h Floor

Markham, ON, L3R 9R9 Canada

T I 905 470 0015 F I 905 470 0030

Our Ref. 18131/200

RE: Proposed Wendy's and Mr. Lube Development- 6625 Dovedale Drive, Traffic and Access Review

Dear Chris Stoyanovich,

The following letter has been prepared to review the access arrangement and traffic impact of the proposed Wendy's and quick-lube development located at 6625 Dovedale Drive (herein referred to as the subject site). LEA Consulting Ltd. has prepared a traffic and access review of the development as proposed to understand how this will impact the lands in the surrounding area. The proposed site is located south of Dovedale Drive and west of Woodbine Avenue, just north of an existing commercial plaza. The current development proposal will gain access to an internal connection to the southern property from Dovedale Drive. The site context is illustrated below in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Conceptual Site Plan

This letter will firstly outline the current development proposal, followed by the projected trip generation. This trip generation was compared to what was previously approved on-site to understand the difference in traffic impact. An intersection capacity analysis was performed of the anticipated future volumes as well. Following this, a sensitivity analysis was completed considering the impact to a potential development of the lands to the west of the subject site,


66

as the subject site and this property may have an aligned access to the internal road connection. Overall, it was concluded that the introduction of the proposed development can be accommodated onto the road network and will not negatively impact the lands in the surrounding area.

DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL The development as proposed will consist of a Wendy's restaurant and a quick-lube establishment with a proposed GFA of 2,510 ft 2 and 2,222 ft2 respectively. The proposed site access will be located off the existing internal connection to the southern commercial property. The preliminary site plan is illustrated below in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Proposed Development Site Plan

TRIP GENERATION The anticipated trip generation for both the Wendy's and quick-lube have been projected. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, gth Edition has been used to project the anticipated trip generation for the proposed quick-lube. Land use code 941 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop has been used to determine the future trips. For the Wendy's restaurant, three (3) proxy site trip rates of Quick Service Restaurants in similar transportation contexts have been used to determine an appropriate trip rate to project the Wendy's trips. Table 1 outlines the trip generation of the proposed development.

I

Pagel2 WWW.LEA.lA

Report# DS-201 B-0044 Attachment 9 Pages 6 of 26

67

TRIP GENERATION

Weekday PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour

In Out Total In Out Total

ITE Land Use Code 941: Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop (2,222 ft21/3 Servicing Positions)

Average Rate (Trips/Servicing Position) 2.53 2.07 4.60 2.12 2.39 4.50

Trips 8 6 14 6 7 13

Average Proxy Rate -Quick Service Restaurant (2,S10 ft2)

Average Rate (Trips/1,000 ft2) 22.0 21.3 43.3 19.8 16.5 36.2

Trips 55 53 108 50 41 91

TOTAL 63 59 122 56 48 104

Table 1: Proposed Development Trip Generation

A total of 122 trips (63 inbound, 59 outbound) are projected to occur in the Weekday PM Peak Hour and 104 trips (56 inbound, 48 outbound) are projected for the Saturday Peak Hour.

As-of-Right Trip Generation The subject lands were previously zoned as C1, and the site was understood to be approved to permit a drive-in bank. The anticipated trips which would be generated from the approved bank was determined in order to compare this with the current development proposal of the Wendy's and quick-lube. The ITE Trip Generation Manual, gth Edition was used to derive the trips associated with the previously approved bank. Land Use Code 912 Drive-In Bank was applied. Two (2) drive-in banks located in the commercial plaza south of the subject site were referenced for GFA. This includes the RBC bank located at 23564 Woodbine Avenue and the TO Canada Trust bank located at 23532 Woodbine Ave. Table 2

outlines the previous and current trip generation.

TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON

Weekday PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour

In Out Total In Out Total

Proposed Development (Wendy's + Quick Lube)

ITE Land Use Code 941: Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop

Average Rate (Trips/Servicing Position) 2.53 2.07 4.60 2.12 2.39 4.50

Trips 8 6 14 6 7 13

Average Proxy Rate- Quick Service Restaurant

Average Rate (Trips/ 1,000 ft2) 22.0 21.3 43.3 19.8 16.5 36.2

Trips 55 53 108 so 41 91

TOTAL 63 59 122 56 48 104

As·of·Right Trip Generation (Drive·ln Bank)

ITE Land Use Code 912: Drive-In Bank

Average Rate (Trips/ 1,000 ft2) 10.23 9.83 20.06 6.59 13.18 26.35

TOTAL Previous Trips 54 54 108 72 70 142

DIFFERENCE +9 +5 +14 -16 -22 -38

Table 2: Trip Generation Comparison

A comparison of the previous approved site and current development proposal reveals a minimal increase of 14 trips generated during the Weekday PM peak hour and a trip reduction of 38 trips during the Saturday peak hour. The increase of 14 trips in the Weekday PM peak hour will result in one (1) additional vehicle every four (4) minutes during PM peak hour traffic. To confirm the traffic impact of the current proposed development, an intersection capacity analysis has been performed with the results detailed in the following subsection below.

Pagel3 WWW.LEA.CA


68

TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT Turning movement counts (TMC) of the existing access into the commercial plaza from Dovedale Drive were collected on Thursday, November 23, 2017 from 4:00PM-6:30PM and Saturday, November 25, 2017 from 11:00 AM-3 :00PM in order to capture the peak traffic volumes occurring at the intersection. The projected site trips outlined above were then added to the existing traffic to determine the futu re traffic impact. The site trips were distributed based on the observed traffic volumes on Dovedale Drive. The total future volumes are shown in Figure 3. The intersection capacity results are outlined below in Table 3.

§: ~ G" t ~

co <0 C7> ... ...,. .. 4 r

(7) 9 J ..,

(120) 81 ~

(34) 35 ~ l c.

~ ~ t ~ C7>

~ .., 4

LEGEND

(f) IIOT TO SCALE

XX(XX)

$

Page 14

55 (49)

116 {83)

161 265 Dovedale Drive ,...

<o ~ ..... <0 M" :c ?::

59 (48)

Proposed SUBJECT SITE Site Access

~ g

WEEKDAY AM (PM) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC

SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION

Figure 3: Future Total Volumes

WWW LEA .Cf\


69

I~--.~· , l_SI \ •.

Intersection

23580 Woodbine Ave Access/236 Dovedale Dr. Access & Dovedale Drive

23580 Woodbine Ave Access & Proposed Site

Access

23580 Woodbine Ave Access/236 Dovedale Dr. Access & Dovedale Drive

23580 Woodbine Ave Access & Proposed Site

Access

Movement of Interest

EBLTR

WBLTR

NBLTR

SBLTR

EBLTR

WBLTR

SBLTR

EBLTR

WBLTR

NBLTR

SBLTR

EBLTR

WBLTR

SBLTR

Flow Rate Capacity (vph) (vph)

Weekday PM Peak Hour

10 1396

179 1469

359 717

70 169

0 1700

64 752

68 1275

Saturday Peak Hour

8 1446

285 1424

383 614

54 133

0 1700

52 707

61 1224

Table 3: Intersection Capacity Analysis Results - Future Scenario

Control 95th V/C LOS

Delay (s) Queue (m)

0.6 0.2 0.01 A

4.3 3.3 0.12 A

14.9 22.6 0.50 B

40.7 14.8 0.41 E

0.0 0.0 0.00 A

10.2 2.2 0.09 B

2.8 1.4 0.05 A

0.4 0.1 O.Dl A

6.0 6.0 0.20 A

20.1 34.6 0.62 c 49.5 14.0 0.41 E

0.0 0.0 0.00 A

10.5 1.9 0.07 B

1.8 1.3 0.05 A

The intersection capacity analysis reveals that both the existing commercial plaza access off of Dovedale Drive and the proposed site access will operate with residual capacity and minimal delays during both the Weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. The southbound left-thru-right movement at the existing commercial plaza access on the north side of Dovedale Drive operates with an LOS of E. This is an acceptable amount of delay. Further, all movements operate within

capacity.

Sensitivity Analysis A sensitivity analysis was completed considering the property to the west of the subject site which may share an aligned site access with the subject site along the internal connection. It is understood that the land uses to be proposed of the vacant lands to the west of the subject site are preliminary or unknown at this time. To be conservative, the trip generation forecasted of the subject site was applied to the lands to the west, and it has been assumed that the property to the west would have access to only the internal connection to be further conservative. Unlike the subject site, this property to the west could gain access directly to Dovedale Drive, or the internal connection to the west.

This sensitivity scenario therefore involves the addition of the assumed site traffic of the lands to the west to the future scenario contemplated previously involving the site the trips as forecasted for the subject site. The future volumes under this scenario are illustrated in Figure 4. Further, the intersection capacity results are shown below in Table 4.

Page IS WWW.LEA.CA


70

Page 16

§; a> G) ~

co co 0> ..q

.... ... (7) 9 1

(120) 81

(40) 46 l

$ Sf $ ~

<") ~ C'? <C <C

.... ... (48) 59 J

LEGEND

XX (XX)

s

t 55 (49)

- 116 (83) r 212 312 Dovedale Drive ., ....

~ ~ ,_ ;;

"' ~ ~ ~

t 59 (48)

SUBJECT Proposed SITE Site Access

~ g

WEEKDAY AM (PM) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC

SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION

Figure 4: Future Total Volumes- Sensitivity Analysis

WWW.LEA.CA

Report# DS-2018-0044 Attachment 9

Pages 10 of 26

71

Intersection Movement Flow Rate Capacity Control 95th

V/C LOS of Interest (vph) (vph) Delay_(s) Queue (m)

Weekday PM Peak Hour

23580 Woodbine Ave EBLTR 10 1396 0.6 0.2 0.01 A

Access/236 Dovedale WBLTR 236 1455 5.1 4.6 0.16 A Dr. Access & Dovedale NBLTR 424 654 20.1 38.0 0.65 c

Drive SBLTR 72 115 78.6 25.4 0.63 F

23580 Woodbine Ave EBLTR 64 324 18.8 5.8 0.20 c Access & Proposed Site WBLTR 64 752 10.2 2.2 0.09 B

Access SBLTR 68 1275 2.3 1.4 0.05 A

Saturday Peak Hour

23580 Woodbine Ave EBLTR 8 1446 0.4 0.1 0.01 A

Access/236 Dovedale WBLTR 335 1417 6.5 7.4 0.24 A Dr. Access & Dovedale NBLTR 434 560 30.1 56.9 0.77 D

Drive SBLTR 57 98 83.6 21.8 0.58 F

23580 Woodbine Ave EBLTR 52 261 22.2 5.8 0.20 c Access & Proposed Site WBLTR 52 707 10.5 1.9 0.07 B

Access SBLTR 61 1224 1.7 1.3 0.05 A

Table 4: Intersection Capacity Analysis Results -Sensitivity Analysis

The sensitivity analysis reveals that both unsignalized intersections will operate acceptably with the addition of site traffic from the lands to the west. The proposed site access will continue to operate with minimal delays if it were to become a shared access for the subject site and lands to the west. An increase in delay is observed for the southbound left-thru-right movement at Dovedale Drive and the northern commercial plaza access under the Weekday PM and Saturday peak hours, respectively. However, this delay is still acceptable, and the movement operates well within capacity.

ACCESS CONSIDERATIONS The subject site is proposed to be accessed from the existing internal connection, providing connectivity to the commercial plaza south of the subject site. The subject site is limited to this location for gaining site access. For the property to the west of the subject site, there are several other opportunities to gain access, including from Dovedale Drive directly, through the commercial plaza south of the site, or through the commercial access road further west. Unlike the subject site, the lands to the west will have several viable access opportunities. If the western property were to have access at multiple points, the traffic impact to the internal connection and Dovedale Drive could be reduced, despite the conservative analysis revealing acceptable traffic operations with a single shared access with the subject site.

CONCLUSIONS The future traffic analysis concludes that the proposed Wendy's and quick-lube development at 6625 Dovedale Drive can be accommodated onto the road network with minimal delays or constraints. Further, the sensitivity analysis concludes that the development of these lands will not adversely impact the development potential of the lands to the west, if a single shared access were to be pursued. A marginal trip generation difference of 14 trips and -38 trips in the Weekday PM and Saturday peak hours will result versus the drive-in bank which was previously approved on the site and the current development proposal.

Page 17 WWW.LEA.CA


72

IL...6. ; , ~ ··

Yours truly,

LEA CONSULTING LTD.

Paul Grove, M.PI. Transportation Planner

Encl: Appendix A -Intersection Capacity Analysis (Future Scenario) Appendix B- Intersection Capacity Analysis (Future Sensitivity Scenario)

WWW.LEA.CA


73

APPENDIX A

Intersection Capacity Analysis (Future Scenario)


74

Weekday P.M Peak Hour

Report # DS-2018-0044 Attachment 9

Pages 14 of 26

75

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: 23580 Woodbine Ave Access/236 Dovedale Dr Access & Dovedale Drive 12/11/2017

Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 9 Future Volume (Veh/h) 9 Sign Control Grade Peak Hour Factor 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 10 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 190 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 190 tC, single (s) 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 pO queue free % 99 eM capacity (veh/h) 1396

Volume Total 139 Volume Left 10 Volume Right 39 cSH 1396 Volume to Capacity 0.01 Queue Length 95th (m) 0.2 Control Delay (s) 0.6 Lane LOS A Approach Delay (s) 0.6 Approach LOS

Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min)

4+ 81 81

Free 0%

0.90 90 1

3.6 1.2

0

None

369 179

61 1469 0.12 3.3 4.3

A 4.3

35 35

0.90 39

359 43

298 717

0.50 22.6 14.9

B 14.9

B

10.6 50.9%

15

4+ 161 116 55 161 116 55

Free 0%

0.90 0.90 0.90 179 129 61

4 3.6 1.2

0

None

300

129

129 4.1

2.2 88

1469

70 54 9

169 0.41 14.8 40.7

E 40.7

E

ICU Level of SeNice

Existing Conditions + Site Traffic 11/27/2017 Weekday PM Peak Hour

4+ 39 16 39 16

Stop 0%

0.90 0.90 43 18

660 678

660 678 7.1 6.5

3.5 4.0 87 95

333 329

4+ 268 49 6 8 268 49 6 8

Stop 0%

0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 298 54 7 9

114 958 666 160

114 958 666 160 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2

3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 68 62 98 99

942 141 333 889

A

Report # DS·-2018-0044 Attachment 9 Pages 15 of 26

76

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: 23580 Woodbine Ave Access & Proposed Site Access

Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 Sign Control Grade Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 638 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 638 tC , single (s) 7.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 pO queue free % 100 eM capacity (veh/h) 342

Volume Total 0 Volume Left 0 Volume Right 0 cSH 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.00 Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 Lane LOS A Approach Delay (s) 0.0 Approach LOS A


~ 0 0

Stop 0%

0.92 0

574

574 6.5

4.0 100 406

64 0

64 752 0.09 2.2

10.2 B

10.2 B

0 0

0.92 0

151

151 6.2

3.3 100 895

287 0 0

1430 0.00 0.0 0.0

0.0

2.2 38.3%

15

0 0

0.92 0

574

574 7.1

3.5 100 412

219 68 0

1275 0.05 1.4 2.8

A 2.8

~ 0 59 0 59

Stop 0%

0.92 0.92 0 64

574 287

574 287 6.5 6.2

4.0 3.3 100 91 406 752

ICU Level of Service

Existing Conditions + Site Traffic 11/27/2017 Weekday PM Peak Hour

~ 0 264 0 264

Free 0%

0.92 0.92 0 287

None

151

151 4.1

2.2 100

1430

12/11/2017

~ 0 63 139 0 0 63 139 0

Free 0%

0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 68 151 0

None

287

287 4.1

2.2 95

1275

A


Pages 16 of 26

77

Saturday Peak Hour


-==r:

78


Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ Traffic Volume (veh/h) 7 120 34 265 83 49 Future Volume (Veh/h) 7 120 34 265 83 49 Sign Control Free Free Grade 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 8 129 37 285 89 53 Pedestrians 4 3 Lane Width (m) 3.6 3.6 Walking Speed (m/s) 1.2 1.2 Percent Blockage 0 0 Right tum flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) 300 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 145 166 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf val vCu, unblocked val 145 166 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 2.2 pO queue free % 99 80 eM capacity (veh/h) 1446 1424

Volume Total 174 427 383 54 Volume Left 8 285 40 27 Volume Right 37 53 326 10 cSH 1446 1424 614 133 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.20 0.62 0.41 Queue Length 95th (m) 0.1 6.0 34.6 14.0 Control Delay (s) 0.4 6.0 20.1 49.5 Lane LOS A A c E Approach Delay (s) 0.4 6.0 20.1 49.5 Approach LOS c E

Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.9% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15

Existing Conditions+ Site Traffic 11/27/2017 Saturday Peak Hour

4+ 37 16 37 16

Stop 0%

0.93 0.93 40 17

872 878

872 878 7.1 6.5

3.5 4.0 81 93

214 229

4+ 303 25 16 9 303 25 16 9

Stop 0%

0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 326 27 17 10

3 3.6 1.2

0

150 1190 870 122

150 1190 870 122 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2

3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 64 68 93 99

899 84 231 929

B


79

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: 23580 Woodbine Ave Access & Pro~osed Site Access

~ -+ ~ ., +- '

Lane Configurations 4t- 4t-Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 48 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 48 Sign Control Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 52 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 791 739 282 739 739 335 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 791 739 282 739 739 335 tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 pO queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 93 eM capacity (veh/h) 274 328 757 320 326 707

Volume Total 0 52 335 343 Volume Left 0 0 0 61 Volume Right 0 52 0 0 cSH 1700 707 1280 1224 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.05 Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 1.9 0.0 1.3 Control Delay (s) 0.0 10.5 0.0 1.8 Lane LOS A B A Approach Delay (s) 0.0 10.5 0.0 1.8 Approach LOS A B

Average Delay 1.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.3% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15

Existing Conditions+ Site Traffic 11/27/2017 Saturday Peak Hour

"" t 4t-

0 308 0 308

Free 0%

0.92 0.92 0 335

None

282

282 4.1

2.2 100

1280

12/11/2017 ,. \. ~ .,

4t-0 56 259 0 0 56 259 0

Free 0%

0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 61 282 0

None

335

335 4.1

2.2 95

1224

A


80

APPENDIXB

Intersection Capacity Analysis (Future Sensitivity Scenario)


Pages 20 of 26

81

Weekday P.M Peak Hour


Pages 21 of 26

82


Lane Configurations 4t Traffic Volume (veh/h) 9 81 46 Future Volume (Veh/h) 9 81 46 Sign Control Free Grade 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 10 90 51 Pedestrians 1 Lane Width (m) 3.6 Walking Speed (m/s) 1.2 Percent Blockage 0 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 190 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 190 tC, single (s) 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 pO queue free % 99 eM capacity (veh/h) 1396

Volume Total 151 426 424 Volume Left 10 236 51 Volume Right 51 61 352 cSH 1396 1455 654 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.16 0.65 Queue Length 95th (m) 0.2 4.6 38.0 Control Delay (s) 0.6 5.1 20.1 Lane LOS A A c Approach Delay (s) 0.6 5.1 20.1 Approach LOS c

Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.5% Analysis Period (min) 15

Sensitivity Analysis 11/27/2017 Weekday PM Peak Hour

4t 212 116 55 46 212 116 55 46

Free 0%

0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 236 129 61 51

4 3.6 1.2

0

None

300

141 782

141 782 4.1 7.1

2.2 3.5 84 81

1455 264

72 54 9

115 0.63 25.4 78.6

F 78.6

F


4t 19 317 19 317

Stop 0%

0.90 0.90 21 352

798 120

798 120 6.5 6.2

4.0 3.3 92 62

267 934

B

4t 49 8 8 49 8 8

Stop 0%

0.90 0.90 0.90 54 9 9

1134 792 160

1134 792 160 7.1 6.5 6.2

3.5 4.0 3.3 42 97 99 92 269 889

Report-# DS-2018~0044 Attachment 9

Pages 22 of 26

83

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: 23580 Woodbine Ave Access & Pro~osed Site Access

~ -+ ~ .( .,.__ .....

Lane Configurations 4t- 4t-Traffic Volume (veh/h) 59 0 0 0 0 59 Future Volume (Veh/h) 59 0 0 0 0 59 Sign Control Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 64 0 0 0 0 64 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right tum flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 672 608 185 608 642 287 vC 1, stage 1 conf val vC2, stage 2 conf val vCu, unblocked val 672 608 185 608 642 287 tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 pO queue free % 80 100 100 100 100 91 eM capacity (veh/h) 324 388 857 391 371 752

Volume Total 64 64 287 287 Volume Left 64 0 0 68 Volume Right 0 64 0 68 cSH 324 752 1350 1275 Volume to Capacity 0.20 0.09 0.00 0.05 Queue Length 95th (m) 5.8 2.2 0.0 1.4 Control Delay (s) 18.8 10.2 0.0 2.3 Lane LOS c B A Approach Delay (s) 18.8 10.2 0.0 2.3 Approach LOS c B

Average Delay 3.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.5% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15

Sensitivity Analysis 11/27/2017 Weekday PM Peak Hour

~ t

0 0

Free 0%

0.92 0.92 0 287

None

219

219 4.1

2.2 100

1350

12/11/2017

I" \.. ~ 4'

4t-0 63 139 63 0 63 139 63

Free 0%

0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 68 151 68

None

287

287 4.1

2.2 95

1275

A


84

Saturday Peak Hour


85


Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 7 Future Volume (Veh/h) 7 Sign Control Grade Peak Hour Factor 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 8 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 145 vC 1 , stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 145 tC, single (s) 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 pO queue free % 99 eM capacity (veh/h) 1446

Volume Total 180 Volume Left 8 Volume Right 43 cSH 1446 Volume to Capacity 0.01 Queue Length 95th (m) 0.1 Control Delay (s) 0.4 Lane LOS A Approach Delay (s) 0.4 Approach LOS


4+ 120 120

Free 0%

0.93 129

4 3.6 1.2

0

None

477 335

53 1417 0.24 7.4 6.5

A 6.5

40 40

0.93 43

434 45

370 560 0.77 56.9 30.1

D 30.1

D

18.3 68.9%

15

Sensitivity Analysis 11/27/2017 Saturday Peak Hour

312 312

0.93 335

172

172 4.1

2.2 76

1417

57 27 10 98

0.58 21.8 83.6

F 83.6

F

t 4+ 4+ 83 49 42 18 83 49 42 18

Free Stop 0% 0%

0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 89 53 45 19 3

3.6 1.2

0

None

300

976 982

976 982 7.1 6.5

3.5 4.0 74 90

172 190


344 344

0.93 370

154

154 6.2

3.3 59

896

c

4+ 25 19 9 25 19 9

Stop 0%

0.93 0.93 0.93 27 20 10

3 3.6 1.2

0

1338 976 122

1338 976 122 7.1 6.5 6.2

3.5 4.0 3.3 53 90 99 58 192 929


86

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: 23580 Woodbine Ave Access & Proposed Site Access

Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 48 Future Volume (Veh/h) 48 Sign Control Grade Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 52 Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 822 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked val 822 tC, single (s) 7.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 pO queue free % 80 eM capacity (veh/h) 261

Volume Total 52 Volume Left 52 Volume Right 0 cSH 261 Volume to Capacity 0.20 Queue Length 95th (m) 5.8 Control Delay (s) 22.2 Lane LOS c Approach Delay (s) 22.2 Approach LOS c


4+ 0 0

Stop 0%

0.92 0

770

770 6.5

4.0 100 315

52 0

52 707 0.07 1.9

10.5 B

10.5 B

0 0

0.92 0

312

312 6.2

3.3 100 728

335 0 0

1216 0.00 0.0 0.0

0.0

2.8 55.7%

15

Sensitivity Analysis 11/27/2017 Saturday Peak Hour

4+ 0 0 48 0 0 48

Stop 0%

0.92 0.92 0.92 0 0 52

770 800 335

770 800 335 7.1 6.5 6.2

3.5 4.0 3.3 100 100 93 306 302 707

404 61 61

1224 0.05 1.3 1.7

A 1.7


4+ 0 308 0 308

Free 0%

0.92 0.92 0 335

None

343

343 4.1

2.2 100

1216

12/11/2017

4+ 0 56 259 56 0 56 259 56

Free 0%

0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 61 282 61

None

335

335 4.1

2.2 95

1224

8


87


REPORT NO. RC-2018-0008

FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF COUNCIL

APRIL 4, 2018

SUBJECT: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE LOAN GUARANTOR REQUEST

1. RECOMMENDATION:

1. That Council receive Report No. RC-2018-0008 prepared by the Cultural Services Division, Recreation and Culture Department, dated April 4, 2018, respecting the Chamber of Commerce Loan Guarantor Request.

2. That Council approve the Town to be the loan guarantor for $8,000 in addition to the previously approved $60,000 to the Chamber of Commerce in favour of South Lake Community Futures Development Corporation.

2. PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to seek Council's approval for the Town to be the loan guarantor for an additional $8,000 to the Chamber of Commerce from South Lake Community Futures Development Corporation.

3. BACKGROUND:

On November 16, 2016, Council passed Resolution No. C-2016-0585 as follows:

1. That Council receive Report No. RC-2016-0040 prepared by the Cultural Services Division, Recreation and Culture Department, dated November 16, 2016, respecting the Chamber of Commerce Temporary Location at The Link and Loan Guarantor Request.

2. That Council approve the use of Program Room 2 as the temporary location for the Chamber of Commerce for a monthly fee of $500 plus applicable taxes and direct staff to bring forward a lease agreement for the period January 1 to April 1, 2017.

88

Page 2 of Report No. RC-2018-0008

3. That Council approve the Town to be the guarantor for a loan of $60,000 to the Chamber of Commerce in favour of South Lake Community Futures Development Corporation.

The loan is to be used to fund tenant improvements for Hub Space B, which the Chamber of Commerce received a building permit for on February 12, 2018.

On February 13, 2018, Georgina Chamber of Commerce Manager of Membership Services & Tourism emailed the Town's Treasurer to state that although Town Council had previously approved being a guarantor for a loan of $60,000, the actual loan amount from South Lake Community Futures Development Corporation is $68,000.

On March 9, 2018, with Council's approval, the Treasurer signed documents on behalf of the Town to be the Guarantor on the first $60,000.

4. ANALYSIS:

Town staff have been granted authority and have guaranteed $60,000 of the $68,000 loan request and therefore require further Council authorization for the remaining $8,000 not previously approved in November, 2016. South Lake Community Futures Development Corporation will not provide the additional $8,000 unless the Town is willing to be the Guarantor on the additional amount.


Upon taking occupancy of Hub Space B, the Chamber of Commerce will pay the Town a monthly licence fee of approximately $1,100 (excluding HST) in 2018.

6. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND NOTICE REQUIREMENTS:

This report is available on the Town's website and upon request from the Town Clerk.

7. CONCLUSION:

Staff recommend that Council approve the Town be the guarantor for the additional $8,000 to the Chamber of Commerce in favour of South Lake Community Futures Development Corporation.

89


y:

. f(L--Phil ose-Donahoe, B.A. Hons., MMSt Manager of Cultural Services

Recommended by:

Rob Whea r, CPA, CA Treasurer

Recommended by:

Robin McDo all, B.A. KINE, DPA Director of Recreation and Culture

Approved by:

fh;v_~Ut P.Wo.-, Winanne Grant, .A., AMCT, CEMC Chief Administrative Officer

90


REPORT NO. RC-2018-0009


APRIL 4, 2018

SUBJECT: GEORGINA ARTS CENTRE & GALLERY FUTURE FACILITY OPTIONS - SHORTLIST APPROVAL

1. RECOMMENDATION:

1. That Council receive Report No. RC-2018-0009 prepared by the Cultural Services Division, Recreation and Culture Department, dated April 4, 2018, respecting the Georgina Arts Centre & Gallery Future Facility Options Shortlist Approval.

2. That Council approve the shortlist of potential future facility options for the Georgina Arts Centre & Gallery.

3. That staff report back on the recommended next steps detailed in this report for for further direction.

2. PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to seek Council's approval of the facility shortlist for the Georgina Arts Centre & Gallery (GACAG).

3. BACKGROUND:

On October 11, 2017, Council passed Resolution No. C-2017-0528 as follows:

That the presentation by Bill Major, Georgina Arts Council/ Georgina Arts Centre and Gallery, respecting the progress of the Arts Centre be received and that Town Council endorse the concept of further investigation with the Arts Centre on their longterm vision and that Town staff assist in exploring potential new locations.

Since passing the above resolution, Town staff developed a preliminary Facility Assessment Checklist to help guide the evaluation of future potential art gallery locations (Attachment 1 ).

91


Staff met with GACAG staff and Board members on January 25, 2018, and using the Checklist to guide the discussion, created a shortlist of potential facilities to explore over the coming months with the purpose of determining the feasibility of each.

In December 2017, the GACAG Board of Directors also partnered with the Ontario Water Centre (OWC) and the Chippewas of Georgina Island First Nation (CGIFN) on a collaborative grant application to South Lake Community Futures Development Corporation (SLCFDC) seeking funds to support the completion of a plan for a multidisciplinary arts facility adjacent to ClearWater Farm. Although the grant submission was not approved, SLCFDC suggested that another collaborative application could be submitted at a later date.

4. ANALYSIS:

The list below includes the long list of facility options discussed on January 25. It is divided into New Build and Existing/Renovation. The New Build list includes opportunities to add an art gallery space to a future facility. The Existing/Renovation list includes opportunities to renovate an existing facility to accommodate an art gallery space.

New Build: 1. New Civic Centre, Keswick: with the potential development of a new Civic

Centre, there may be an opportunity to incorporate an art gallery space into the construction of this facility.

2. Multi-Use Recreation Complex (MURC), Keswick: similar to the Civic Centre option, it may be possible to include an art gallery space into the future MURC project.

3. Red Barn property, Jackson's Point: is a privately-owned property, but given the history of the property as an arts and culture venue, staff and the GACAG recognized the potential of this site.

4. Stephen Leacock Theatre/Club 55, Keswick: the addition of an art gallery to the Stephen Leacock Theatre/Club 55 facility would transform it into a Cultural Centre that would combine arts programming and the performing arts with other arts and cultural activities. The merits of this option include the colocation of like services that could lead to operating efficiencies and collaborative programming opportunities. The addition of an art gallery to an already busy facility would present parking concerns that would need to be addressed. Alternatively, an expansion of the proposed dedicated senior's programming space at the MURC, combined with the option of a smaller dedicated space at the current Club 55 site, could help to alleviate this concern.

5. Current GACAG, Sutton: given the long list of deficiencies identified in the Building Condition Assessment, renovating the existing facility poses significant

92


challenges, however, it may be possible to construct a new art gallery on the existing property that better serves the needs of the community.

6. OWC/CiearWater Farm: as previously mentioned, the GACAG Board of Directors has the opportunity to partner with the Ontario Water Centre and the CGIFN) on a second grant application to SLCFDC for the development of a plan for a multidisciplinary arts facility adjacent to ClearWater Farm.

Existing/Renovation: 1. The Link, Sutton: it is likely too late to accommodate a full-scale art gallery at The

Link given the number of organizations approved as tenants. However, it may be worth exploring the possibility of a satellite gallery and programming space at The Link that could meet some of the GACAG's needs.

2. Current GACAG, Sutton: given the deficiencies identified at the art gallery, a large-scale renovation of the existing space seems unlikely, however, it may be worth exploring the possibility of renovating part of the facility, demolishing other parts and constructing an addition to the remaining building.

3. Former Operations Centre, Keswick: while this option may be unlikely for a host of reasons, given the ample square footage and high visibility on Baseline Road, staff and the GACAG raised it as an option.

4 . St. James Parish Hall, Sutton: this option was raised by a community member, but given the structure's small footprint, its historic significance, the fact it is not Town owned, and that the building has a long list of deficiencies, staff believe this option should not be explored further.

5. Sutton High School, Sutton: the declining student population at Sutton High School has presented the possibility of entering into a facility partnership with York Region District School Board for access to a portion of the school. The GACAG Board has done some preliminary exploration of this option and believe enough barriers exist so as not to explore it further at this time. Some of their concerns include the age of the school, uncertainty regarding lease costs and lease agreement term lengths, and accessibility barriers.

6. Nurse Practitioner Clinic, Sutton: with the construction of a new Nurse Practitioner Clinic in Jackson's Point, a community member raised the possibility of moving the art gallery into the existing clinic once it is vacated. Following general discussion with members of the Health Care Council, the feasibility of this option is doubtful.

Based on a preliminary assessment of the options listed above, staff and the GACAG recommend that the following facilities be shortlisted for further examination:

New Build: 1. Civic Centre 2. MURC 3. Stephen Leacock Theatre/Club 55 4. Current GACAG

93


5. Ontario Water Centre/ClearWater Farm

Existing Facility:

1. Current GACAG

With Council's approval of this shortlist, staff recommend the following next steps be taken:

1. Review the Building Condition Assessments for each shortlisted facility, if available;

2. Work with the GACAG and other Town staff to complete a Facility Assessment for each shortlisted facility;

3. Research funding available to assist with the development of a more robust feasibility study and plan that includes basic facility designs, construction costing, an operational business plan, and funding strategies for each option.


There are no direct financial impacts associated with this report. Any funding required for this project would be brought forward during the annual budget process.


Town staff consulted with GACAG staff and Board during the preparation of this report. This report is available on the Town's website and upon request from the Town Clerk.

7. CONCLUSION:

Staff recommend that Council approve the facility shortlist for the GACAG so that staff and the GACAG can continue to examine the feasibility of each options.

94


Prepared by:

Uf'-/ Phil ose-Donahoe, B.A. Hons., MMSt Manager of Cultural Services

Approved by:

~\(/\b~ Winanne Grant, B.A., MCT, CEMC Chief Administrative Officer

Recommended by:

Robin McDou II, B.A. KINE, DPA Director of Recreation and Culture

Attachment 1- GACAG Future Facility Options -Initial Feasibility Assessment

95

GAC Future Facility Options - Initial Feasibility Assessment

Evaluator's name:

Name of location:

Criteria Score (see scale

Comments details below)

Location (on arterial road, transportation corridor) Land/building acquisition costs Current property owner Building condition Renovation costs Purpose-built (e.g. for display and storage of art, arts programming, public gatherings, etc.) Square feet (add minimum required) Estimated annual capital costs Estimated annual operating costs Opportunity for shared amenities/operating efficiencies Partnership opportunities Fundraising opportunities Timing Planning considerations (e.g. service allocation, zoning, etc.)

Accessibility (e.g. AODA compliance, location along public transportation route, etc.) TOTAL SCORE:

Scale: 1 =does not meet criteria; 3=somewhat meets criteria; 5=totally meets criteria

Report RC-2018-0009 Attachment 1

96


REPORT NO. 01-2018-0005

FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF COUNCIL APRIL 4, 2018

SUBJECT: AMENDMENT OF TRAFFIC BY-LAW 2002-0046 (TR-1), SCHEDULE Ill: NO PARKING (SIMCOE LANDING)

1. RECOMMENDATION:

1. That Council receive Report No. 01-2018-0005 prepared by the Operations Division, Operations and Infrastructure Department, dated April 4, 2018 respecting the Amendment of Traffic By-law 2002-0046 (TR-1 ), Schedule Ill: No Parking, for Simcoe Landing;

2. That Council amend By-law 2002-0046 (TR-1) - Schedule Ill Page 1 and Page 2 to reflect the recommendations per Report No. OED-2016-0006: Update of Staff Review of On-Street Parking Arrangement in the Town of Georgina;

3. That Council approve the by-law submitted to amend Traffic By-Law 2002-0046 (TR-1)- Schedule Ill: No Parking (Simcoe Landing).

2. PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to amend Schedule Ill: No Parking (Simcoe Landing) (Attachment 1) of By-law 2002-0046 (TR-1 ), being a by-law to regulate traffic and to govern and control the parking of vehicles in the Town of Georgina, for five (5) intended sections of No Parking in Simcoe Landing, based on the recommendations of Report No. OED-2016-0006: Update of Staff Review of On-Street Parking Arrangements in the Town of Georgina (Attachment 2).

3. BACKGROUND:

In Report No. PB-2009-0054: Parking Issues Within the Simcoe Landing Subdivision, states that Phases I to IV of the first draft approved plan for Simcoe Landing allowed for reduced width standards for parking spaces, both in the garage and in the front yard driveway (i.e. 2.75 metres). Such reduced standards created parking issues, particularly in townhouse dwelling units containing single car garages. In Phases V to VII, these standards have been increased (i.e. return to the general width requirement of 3.0 meters) for townhouse dwelling units to help alleviate the problems being experienced in the earlier phases.

97

Page 2 of Report No. 01-2018-0005

Because of the issues in Phases I to IV, Council directed staff to review on street parking arrangements Town-wide and analyze the impacts from an operational, enforcement, risk and liability perspective. This review was completed and reported in Report No. OED-2016-0006: Update of Staff Review of On-Street Parking Arrangements in the Town of Georgina. Despite the redesign of Phase V and VI, Council approved to include streets identified in Phases I through VI in Simcoe Landing for the street parking restrictions .

These restrictions, which are unique to Simcoe Landing within Phases I through VI are:

1. Parking is allowed on odd and even days on the side of the road with odd and even number houses respectively, from 9:00 a.m. of the respective day to 9:00 a.m. of the next day,

2. The provision of the By-law No. 2002-0046 (TR 1) (as most recently amended) which allows parking for three (3) hours on Town roads does not apply,

3. The provision of the By-law no. 2002-0046 (TR1) for no parking on Town roads between 2:00a.m. and 7:00a.m. from and including November 15th of each year, to and including April 15th of the following year does not apply in the noted area of Simcoe Landing .

Municipal Law Enforcement (MLE) has received complaints from residents regarding the parking arrangements on the unassumed portions of the roads in Phases VII A, VII Band VIII of Simcoe Landing. Council will be presented Report DS-2018-0045: Phase VII A and VII BRoad Assumptions in Simcoe Landing, on April4, 2018, for the assumption of further roads in Phases VII A and VII B.

The current Schedule Ill places the same conditions on the new phases (road extensions) as in Phases I through VI. As the situation regarding the parking and housing density was addressed in the phases after Phase VI, the Schedule Ill parking restrictions are not required for future phases.

4. ANALYSIS:

The streets in Schedule Ill, within Simcoe Landing, define all of the limits as "Entire Street" where No Parking would be enforced, which would include any future extensions.

It was the intention of the Report No. OED-2016-0006 to have only portions of the roads listed below to include No Parking restrictions as follows (Attachment 3) :

Street Amended Limit

Joe Dales Drive The Queensway South to the westerly limit of Robert Wilson Crescent

Paulgrave Avenue Laurendale Avenue to Bache Avenue Strathgreen Lane Terrell Avenue to Bostock Drive Terrell Avenue Strathgreen Lane to Laurendale Drive

Thornlodge Drive Ravenshoe Road to the northern limit of Carness Crescent.

98


This report recommends the amendment to define the extent of the parking restrictions in Simcoe Landing. The amendment to Schedule Ill will meet the intention of the staff Report No. OED-2016-0006.

Minor changes are required to the street signs to accommodate this proposed amendment.

5. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

- Goal 4: Provide Exceptional Municipal Service


There are sufficient funds in the appropriate operating budget to make the necessary changes and ensure on-street signage comply with the amended by-law.


N/A for this report.

99


8. CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that Traffic By-law 2002-0046 (TR-1), Schedule Ill be amended to define the limits of the parking restrictions for the aforementioned five (5) streets.

I

Manager of Operations and Infrastructure

Approved by:

Winan~Bh~MCT, CEMC Chief Administrative Officer

Recommended by:

Jo~ Acting Director of Operations & Infrastructure

Attachment 1- Bylaw 2002-0046 (TR-1)- Schedule Ill- No Parking (Simcoe Landing) Attachment 2- Report OED-2016-0006 Attachment 3 - Simcoe Landing Map

100

CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA IN THE


BY-LAW NO. 2018-

BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW NO. 2002-0046 (TR-1) - SCHEDULE Ill, TO REGULATE TRAFFIC AND CONTROL THE PARKING OF VEHICLES IN SIMCOE LANDING

WHEREAS the Town of Georgina wishes to amend Schedule Ill of By-law 2002-0046 (TR-1) which regulates the parking in Simcoe Landing, to add limits to No Parking for Joe Dales Drive, Paulgrave Avenue, Strathgreen Lane, Terrell Avenue and Thornlodge Drive and replace pages 1 and 2 of Schedule Ill.

NOW THEREFORE, enacted by the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Georgina that:

1) By-Law 2002-0046 (TR-1) as amended is hereby further amended by deleting therefrom Page 1 and Page 2 of Schedule Ill and replacing same with Page 1 and Page 2 of Schedule Ill, with the additions of limits as follows:

i) Joe Dales Drive, within the limits of The Queensway South to the westerly limit of Robert Wilson Crescent;

ii) Paulgrave Avenue from Laurendale Avenue to Bache Avenue;

iii) Strathgreen Lane from Terrell Avenue to Bostock Drive; iv) Terrell Avenue from Strathgreen Lane to Laurendale

Drive; v) Thornlodge Drive from Ravenshoe Road to the northerly

limit of Carness Crescent.

READ and enacted this 41h day of April, 2018.



101


REPORT NO. OED-2016-0006

FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF COUNCIL MARCH 2, 2016

SUBJECT: UPDATE OF STAFF REVIEW OF ON-STREET PARKING ARRANGEMENTS IN TOWN OF GEORGINA

1. RECOMMENDATION:

1. That Council receive Report No. OED-2016-0006 prepared by the Operations and Engineering Department dated March 2, 2016 regarding the update of staff review of on street parking arrangements in Town of Georgina,

2. That Staff recommends amending By-law 2002-0046 (TR-1) to exempt the noted area of Simcoe Landing from parking prohibitions for the defined times of the days and defined winter period as noted in the report,

3. That Staff recommends a tighter enforcement of the switchover period from one side of the road to the other in the noted area of Simcoe Landing,

4. That Staff recommends that no more roads in the noted area of Simcoe Landing or any new road in any new development be added to the bylaw to allow on-street parking without further staff review and analysis, and further the current By-law 2002-0045 (TR-1) be amended to include only the streets noted in the report and not the entire Simcoe Landing for the current on-street parking arrangements,

5. That Staff recommends adding the definition of Winter Maintenance Event in By-law 2002-0046 (TR-1) as noted in the Analysis section of the report, and

6. That Staff recommends adding a provision for no on-street parking Town-wide when the Director of Operations and Engineering, or his or her designate, declares a Winter Maintenance Event.

2. PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to provide Council with an update regarding staff review of the on-street parking arrangements on Town roads.

3. BACKGROUND:

Staff was directed by Council to review on-street parking arrangements Town-wide and analyze the impacts from an operational, enforcement, risk and liability perspective. Staff has investigated other snow belt municipalities and cities for best practices.

Report No. 01-2018-0005 Attachment 1

Page 1 of 4

102

Page 2 of Report No. OED-2016-0004

4. ANALYSIS:

After reviewing the on-street parking arrangements Town wide, staff concluded that the current arrangements are reasonably acceptable Town-wide with respect to any negative impacts from an operational, enforcement, risk and liability perspective.

Unique on-street parking arrangements exist within the following boundaries of Simcoe Landing: south of Joe Dales Drive up to Ravenshoe Road east of The Queensway up to Thornlodge Drive, Along with: north of Joe Dales Drive up to Bostock Drive, and east of Strathgreen Lane up to Grangmuir Drive

The names of the roads in the above noted area of Simcoe Landing which are included in the current by-law and where the unique parking arrangements apply are as per below: Bache Avenue, Bostock Drive, Brecken Drive, Brookhurst Avenue, Carness Crescent Crittenden Drive, Glasgow Crescent, Grangemuir Drive, Havenwood Trail, Hirst Avenue, lan Drive, Joe Dales Drive, Laurendale Avenue, Lundigan Drive, Paulgrave Avenue, Reddenhurst Crescent, Silverstone Crescent, Strathgreen Lane, Terrell, Avenue, Thorn lodge Drive, Truscott Avenue, Violet Avenue.

These unique arrangements within the above noted area of Simcoe Landing are described below:

1. Parking is allowed on odd and even days on the side of the road with odd and even number houses respectively, from 9:00a.m. of the respective day to 9:00 a.m. of the next day,

2. The provision of the by-law No. 2002-0046 (TR1) (as most recently amended) which allows parking for three (3) hours on Town roads do not apply,

3. The provision of the by-law no. 2002-0046 (TR 1) for no parking on Town roads between 2:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. from and including November 151h of each year, to and including April 151h of the following year do not apply in the noted area of Simcoe Landing.

As per a previous staff report, it was approved by Council to exempt the noted area of Simcoe Landing from parking prohibitions for the defined times of the days and defined winter period as mentioned in #3 above, but by-law has not been amended.

As a result of the above-mentioned, staff recommends amending By-law 2002-0046 (TR-1) to exempt the noted area of Simcoe Landing from parking prohibitions for the defined times of the days and defined winter period as noted in the report.


Page 2 of 4

103


Currently, municipal staff is providing a grace period from 8:00a.m. to 10 a.m. for switching over parking from one side of the road to the other side of the road in the noted area of Simcoe Landing. If this switchover period is enforced more tightly, then staff can adjust the timing of winter maintenance operations based on the winter event and the day of the month, meaning starting early in the a.m. with the side of the road which has no cars parked and then starting at 9:00 a.m. with the other side of the road.

As a result of the above-mentioned, staff recommends a tighter enforcement of the switchover period from one side of the road to the other In the noted area of Simcoe Landing.

Ideally, to cover risk and liability for the Town, there should be no parking on streets at any time of the day during the winter period. Staff understands the land use pattern in the noted area of Simcoe Landing and further also acknowledges that this area has extended families with multiple vehicles per household. There is a need for providing reasonable on-street parking to facilitate this situation.

As a result of the above-mentioned, staff recommends that no more roads in the noted area of Simcoe Landing or any new road in any new development be added to the by-law without further staff review and analysis.

Staff recommends adding the definition of Winter Maintenance Event: "Winter Maintenance Event" means a period of time from and including November 15th

of each year, to and including April 151h of the following year during which the Director of Operations and Engineering, or his or her designate, in his or her sole discretion, declares that he/she anticipates weather that is likely to require snow plowing, sanding, salting, direct liquid application, snow removal or other winter maintenance operations.

Further, staff recommends adding a provision in by-law 2002-0046 for no onstreet parking Town-wide when Director of Operations and Engineering, or his or her designate, declares a Winter Maintenance Event.


There are adequate funds in the appropriate operating budget to make the necessary changes and ensure on-street signage comply with the current by-law.


N/A for this report. The current parking arrangements in the noted area of Simcoe Landing were arrived at as a result of public consultations in the past.


Page 3 of 4

104


7. CONCLUSION:

The noted recommendations will achieve a reasonable balance for covering the Town's risk/liability and providing reasonable on street parking throughout the Town.

The by-law will be amended based on Council's adoption of the noted recommendations in this report and presented to Council for adoption.

Prepared by:

~~ Gag Sandhu, P.Eng., PMP Infrastructure and Operations Manager

Approved by: (1);] til n f Winanne Grant, B.A., AMCT, CEMC Chief Administrative Officer

. Eng. perations & Engineering


Page 4 of 4

105

BY-LAW 2002-0046 (TR-1) SCHEDULE Ill

COLUMN 1- HIGHWAY

Bache Avenue

Bostock Drive

Brecken Drive

Brookhurst Avenue

Carness Crescent

Crittenden Drive

Glasgow Crescent

Glasgow Crescent

Grangemuir Drive

Havenwood Trail

Hirst Avenue

lan Drive

Jee Dales Drive

Laurendale Avenue

Lundigan Drive

Paulgrave Avenue

COLUMN 2 - SIDE

Even house numbers

Odd house numbers

"

"

"

"

"

..

Even house numbers

Odd house numbers

Even house numbers

Odd house numbers

"

" ..

"

Even house numbers

Odd house numbers

"

I"

Page 1

COLUMN 3- BElWEEN

Entire Street

Entire Street

" ..

"

"

"

"

Entire Street

Entire Street

Entire Street

Entire Street

"

"

" The Queensway South and the westerly limi t of Robert W ilsan Crescent

Entire Street

Entire Street

"

ILaurenQale Avenue te Ba~;;he Aven~e

NO PARKING

COLUMN 4- PROHIBITED

TIMES OR DAYS

9am on odd days to 9am on even days

9am on even days to 9am on odd days

"

"

"

"

"

"



except no parkng on both sides between on the north side of 50 metres, from the westerly boundaries of 1 03 Glasgow Crescent to the southern boundaries of 117 Glasgow Crescent, and on the south side for a distance of 62 metres from the westerly boundaries of 104 Glasgow Crescent to the southern boundaries of 110 Glasgow Crescent.

1-



"

"

"

"




Page 1 of 2

"

"

106

BY-LAW 2002-0046 (TR-1) SCHEDULE Ill

COLUMN 1- HIGHWAY

Reddenhurst Crescent

Silverstone Crescent

Strat_!l~reen Lane _ _ _ _

Page 2

COLUMN 2- SIDE COLUMN 3 - BElWEEN

Even house numbers Entire Street

Odd house numbers Entire Street

Terrell Avenue to Bostock Drive

Terrell Avenue " ---=- -~~--~~--;-.s.:.:ctr::.:.a:...t-~hg'-reen Lane to Laurendale Drive- - --=--~~- - ------ 1 ~

Ravenshoe Road to the northern limtt of earness erescent Thomlodge Drive

Truscott Avenue Even house numbers Entire Street

Odd house numbers Entire Street

Violet Avenue

NO PARKING

COLUMN 4- PROHIBITED TIMES OR DAYS



1- - -

-------9am on odd days to 9am on even days



Page 2 of2

107

"·

Map of Amended Street Limits: Simcoe Landing


ii) Paulgrave Avenue from Laurendale Avenue to Bache Avenue; iii) Strathgreen Lane from Terrell Avenue to Bostock Drive; iv) Terrell Avenue from Strathgreen Lane to Laurendale Drive; v) Thornlodge Drive from Ravenshoe Road to the northerly limit

of Carness Crescent.

Meters (m) "

Meter' (m') " :r.•bl• Soap St!Kt

Report no. 01-2018-0005 Attachment 3

Page 1 of 1

108


REPORT NO. 01-2018-0009


APRIL 4, 2018

SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR CONSULTING SERVICESENGINEERING DESIGN AND ASPHALT INSPECTION

1. RECOMMENDATION:

1. That Council receive Report No. 01-2018-0009 prepared by the Operations Division, Operations and Infrastructure Department dated April 4, 2018 respecting the selection of consulting services.

2. That Council award the contract for "Consulting Services" to Greer Galloway Consulting Engineers for the amount of $191,844 excluding applicable taxes.

3. That Council authorize the Purchasing Division to issue a Purchase Order for RFP OID2018-019: Engineering Services - Engineering Design and Asphalt Inspection and the Director of Operations and Infrastructure enter into a standard Municipal Engineers Association (MEA) Agreement with Greer Galloway Consulting Engineers.

2. PURPOSE:

To seek Council approval to enter into a Municipal Engineers Association standard agreement with Greer Galloway Consulting Engineers.

3. BACKGROUND:

As part of the 2018 budget process Council approved projects • Engineering forWatermain Project (18-WAT-6) • Roads Maintenance Program (18-PWK-3) • Roads Now Needs- Church Street (18-PWK-4).

Staff issued Request for Proposal (RFP) 0102018-019 for Consulting Services -Engineering Design and Asphalt Inspection. The RFP closed on Thursday March 15, 2018.

109


4. ANALYSIS:

The Request for Proposal was completed using the Two Envelope System with a breakdown of 20 for Price and 80 for Technical. Staff received four (4) submissions. Three of the four Respondents achieved the minimum score of 60 out of 80 on the Technical Evaluation and therefore the three (3) Financial Envelopes were opened and scored out of 20 for the 'Total Score' as summarized below.

Proponent Total Score 1 GREER GALLOWAY CONSULTING ENGINEERS 91.14 2 CHISHOLM, FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES 87.22 3 NOVEEN ENGINEERING INC. 85.00

Staff have worked with Greer Galloway's project team for previous projects and are confident in their ability to deliver the required services for various projects.


This report addresses the following strategic goal(s):

GOAL 4: "Provide Exceptional Municipal Service" - ORGANIZATIONAL & OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE.

Staff are proceeding with the design of the shovel ready watermain project in order to be prepared for any applicable funding programs. (18-WAT-6) In addition, staff are implementing the strategic asset management plans not only for water, but for the Roads division in proceeding with the right investment at the right time for the most effective use of municipal funds. (18-PWK-4)


These projects have been approved and are within the 2018 Town of Georgina capital budget.


As part of the assignment, an effective Communication Plan will be established based on need requirements. Notifications through social media, postings on Town Page and hand delivered notices to residents prior to construction will be considered.

110


8. CONCLUSION:

Staff recommend awarding the consulting services works to Greer Galloway Consulting Engineers

Prepared by:

Bob Fortier C.E.T. CRS Capital Projects Manager

Approved by:

Wina~ B.h. ~CT, CEMC Chief Administrative Officer

Recommended by:

John Arms rong Director of perations and Infrastructure

111


SUBJECT:



APRIL 4, 2018

MINOR VARIANCE APPLICATION PROCESS ZONING PROVISIONS & HOUSE SIZES

1. RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. That Council receive Report DS-2018-0034 prepared by the Planning Division, Development Services Department dated April 4, 2018 respecting the Minor Variance Application process, Zoning Provisions and House Sizes.

2. PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to provide staff comments respecting the provisions of Zoning By-law No. 500 in relation to house sizes, and the Minor Variance Application process.

3. BACKGROUND:

At the February 14, 2018 Council meeting, Council considered interoffice memorandums from the Committee of Adjustment Secretary-Treasurer, providing a brief outline on recent decisions issued by the Committee of Adjustment on applications for Minor Variance and/or Consent approval.

With particular regard to a Minor Variance application seeking relief from the maximum lot coverage and maximum height provisions of Zoning By-law 500, Council noted that members of the public have expressed concern respecting larger homes being approved and constructed beside smaller homes. Council referenced the recent approval being granted by the Committee respecting a variance application (Application A40-17) for a proposed 3-storey single family dwelling , having an increased height of 12.9 metres (whereas a maximum height of 11 metres is permitted), and having an increased maximum lot coverage of 36% (whereas a maximum lot coverage of 30% is permitted).

In response, Council requested staff to provide a report explaining the evaluation methodology by the Committee of Adjustment in considering Minor Variance Applications for relief from the provisions of Zoning By-law 500, specifically in relation to the established maximum restrictions on lot coverage and height for

112

Page 2 of Report No. DS-2018-0034

single family dwellings. A copy of the relevant minutes from the February 14, 2018 meeting is provided herein as Attachment 1.

5. ANALYSIS:

5.1 Zoning Provisions affecting Dwelling Sizes

Zoning By-laws control the use of land within a municipality, and with clear specificity, state how land may be used, where buildings and other structures can be located, identify the types of buildings that are permitted and how they may be used, and set restrictions (i.e. minimums/maximums) on such matters as lot sizes and dimensions, parking requirements, building heights, setbacks from the street and property lines, lot coverage, etc.

The Zoning By-law implements the objectives and policies of the Town's Official Plan (including the Secondary Plans), and provides a legal way of managing land use and future development.

Georgina's current comprehensive zoning by-law, referenced as Zoning By-law 500 (the "By-law" or "By-law 500"), was enacted on July 7, 1994, and replaced the Town's first comprehensive zoning by-law, Zoning By-law 911, which was enacted on May 9, 1977.

With specific regard to the matter of single family dwellings, this form of residential use is permitted within the Low Density Urban Residential zones (R1 and R2), the Residential zone (R), the Estate Residential zone (ER), the Transitional zone (T), and the Rural zone (RU). Generally the residential properties within the municipally serviced areas of the Town (i.e. served by municipal water supply and municipal sewage treatment facilities) would be zoned R1 or R2. Notwithstanding, those areas serviced by the Willow Beach servicing project area (now designated as the "Serviced Lakeshore" area) remain, in the most part, zoned R, which generally refer to larger lots, or lots with increased minimum setbacks from the lot lines originally intended to accommodate the installation and maintenance of private sewage disposal systems on the properties.

Section 6.1 of By-law 500 outlines the development standards for the single family dwelling uses within each of the aforementioned zone categories applicable to the individual land parcels within the Town (refer to Attachment 2).

The massing or scale of development on a property is generally established through the minimum setbacks from the lot lines, lot coverage and building height. The intent of establishing minimum setbacks from lot lines is to ensure that there is adequate separation and privacy between adjacent dwellings in order to provide for proper grading and drainage on each lot, to provide for access to the rear yards,

113


to mitigate the massing of dwellings from a streetscape perspective, and to prevent overshadowing impacts on adjacent properties. Similarly, restrictions on the maximum height of a dwelling would also mitigate the massing of the dwelling from a streetscape perspective, and ensure that the height of a dwelling will not result in unacceptable adverse overlook or overshadowing impacts on adjacent properties. Restrictions on the maximum lot coverage would ensure there is sufficient amenity space and that the property does not become overdeveloped.

With reference to Attachment 2 for the specific details, the following table outlines those general provisions applicable to single family dwellings on interior lots (i.e .. not corner lots) on R1 or R2 zoned properties and on R zoned properties (remembering many of those R zoned properties are now on full municipal services):

Zone R1 R2 R Standard Lot 15 m where served by 15 m where served by 30m Frontage sanitary sewers sanitary sewers (min) Lot Area 450 sq m 450 sq m 4,000 sq m (min) Front Yard 6m 6m 8 m (if lot less than (min) 4,000 sq m)

10m (if lot 4,000 sq m or greater)

Ext. Side 5m 5m 7 m (if lot less than Yard (min) 4,000 sq m)

9 m (if lot 4,000 sq m or greater)

Rear Yard Bm Bm 12m (min) Int. Side 1.2 m + 0.5 m for 1.2 m + 0.5 m for 1.2 m on one side + Yard (min) each additional or each additional or 0.5 m for each

partial storey above partial storey above additional or partial the first. If no the first. If no storey above the first, attached garage or attached garage or and 2.5 m on the carport, the min. on carport, the min. on other side one side shall be 2.5 one side shall be 2.5 m m

Floor Area 1 00 sq m (if lot less 1 00 sq m (if lot less 100 sq m (if lot less (min) than 4,000 sq m) than 4,000 sq m) than 4,000 sq m)

114


Zone R1 R2 R Standard (Note: 112 sq m (if lot 4,000 112 sq m (if lot 4,000 112 sq m (if lot 4,000 There is no sq m or greater) sq m or greater) sq m or greater) restriction on a max floor area.) Lot 30% 30% 30% Coverage (max) Height of 11 m 11 m 11 m Building (max)

For the most part, the above referenced provisions are the general standards that have been in place since the enactment of the first comprehensive zoning by-law in 1977, and these remain applicable to most of the older residential areas of the Town, including many of the residential subdivisions that were constructed in the 1970's and 1980's.

In response to the provincial directive for intensification over the past two decades to help curb urban sprawl (refer to the provincial consideration of OPA 71 -Keswick Secondary Plan in 1994), residential subdivisions since that time have been designed and approved at higher densities, with larger dwellings on smaller lots, decreased setbacks from the lot lines, and without maximum lot coverage standards being imposed. As the historic zone standards would not produce the increasing density targets required by the Province, this has resulted in numerous site-specific zoning by-laws being enacted for every subdivision application over the last 20+ years, all having much lesser standards in comparison to those first enacted in the 1977 Zoning By-law.

As an example of the above, the following table illustrates the residential zone standards for subdivisions recently approved within the Keswick and Sutton communities (DG Group Ph. 9 in Keswick and Ballymore Ph. 2 in Sutton):

Zone Standard R1-137 R1-140 (DG Group Ph 9) (Ballymore Ph 2)

Lot Frontage 11 m 11 m (min) Lot Area (min) 280 sq m 330 sq m

Front Yard 4 m to dwelling 5 m to dwelling (min)

5.8 m to garage 6 m to garage

115


Zone Standard R1-137 R1-140 (DG Group Ph 9) (Ballymore Ph 2)

Ext. Side Yard 2.4 m 4m (min)

(3.0 m if abutting a road having a width of 23 m or greater)

Rear Yard 6m 7.5 m (min) Int. Side Yard 0.6 m on one side and 1.2 m on 0.6 m on one side and 1.2 m on the (min) the other side other side, plus 0.5 m for each

additional or partial storey above the second

Floor Area 100 sq m (if lot less than 4, 000 100 sq m (if lot less than 4, 000 sq (min) sq m) m)

112 sq m (if lot 4,000 sq m or 112 sq m (if lot 4,000 sq m or greater) greater)

(i.e. no change from standard) (i.e. no change from standard)

Lot Coverage Not applicable Not applicable (max) Height of 11m 11 m Building (max) (i.e. no change from standard) (i.e. no change from standard)

In consideration of the above demonstration, one can see how the massing and scale of residential lot development within our communities has changed over the years. Larger homes on smaller lots, with decreased setbacks from the lot lines and no maximum lot coverage provisions (i.e. dwelling dimensions are now dictated by setbacks from lot lines) . What is also illustrated is that there has been no change to the zone standards within the new subdivisions in relation to the maximum height of dwellings; it remains at an 11 m maximum height.

Pursuant to Section 2.99 of By-law 500, "height" is defined as the vertical distance of a building or structure measured between the average finished grade and the highest point of the roof structure. While the By-law does not restrict the number of storeys in a single family dwelling unit, it does define the term "storey" as being the height between any floor and the floors, ceiling or roof next above (refer to Sec. 2.190 of By-law 500).

As discussed with our Building Division, where a dwelling is more than 1-storey, one typically measures from the top of the one floor to the top surface of the next floor (i.e. walking surface to walking surface), which generally adds an additional

116


1 ft (0.3 m) to the storey height1. In this regard, for a dwelling having an 8ft or 9ft ceiling height, the height of the storey would typically be 9ft or 10ft (i.e. including the additional 1 ft thereon). Therefore the storey height of a typical 3-storey dwelling (excluding the roof and any foundation above grade) would be between 27 - 30 ft. Depending upon the foundation design and the design of the roof structure on the dwelling, an 11 metre maximum height (i.e. 36 ft) could in fact result in a 3-storey single family dwelling.

In the past 10 years (i.e. 2008 forward), the Committee of Adjustment has processed 3 applications for minor variance approval with regard to requests to exceed the maximum height restrictions of the By-law:

• Application A26-13, for 580 Lake Drive North, was approved by the Committee on August 19, 2013, for a 3-storey dwelling having a height of 14.05 metres from average finished grade to top of the roof peak.

• Application A1-16, for 6 Shangri La Lane, was approved by the Committee on March 7, 2016, for a 3-storey dwelling having a height of 11.8 metres from average finished grade to top of the roof peak.

• Application A40-17, for 25 Shirlea Boulevard, was approved by the Committee on January 22, 2018, for a 3-storey dwelling having a height of 12.9 metres from average finished grade to top of the roof peak.

• All three requests for height exceedance were supported by staff, approved by the Committee, and not appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.

Upon discussion with Building Division staff, there are various examples of 3-storey single family dwellings having been constructed within the Town, including those noted above for which variances were granted to exceed the height limitation of the by-law; and, other 3-storey dwellings built without need for variances on the height restrictions, such as 1A Lake Drive South, 4 Shangri La Lane, 32 Shirlea Boulevard, and 260 Metro Road North. Building staff have also advised that single family homes within most new subdivisions in the Town are constructed at or close to the 11 metre maximum height limitation, albeit with only 2-storeys of living space, or 2 storeys with a portion of the roof space/attic area also providing living space (i.e. 3rd storey living space within the roof area).

5.2 Minor Variances and the Planning Act

Section 44(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 c.P.13, as amended, grants the power of a municipality to, by by-law, constitute and appoint a Committee of Adjustment for the municipality. In 1984, By-law 84-40 (COU-1) first constituted and appointed a Committee of Adjustment, while By-law 84-42 (COU-1) appointed the members thereto. Since that time, various by-laws have been passed to appoint new members to the Committee, coinciding with the terms of office for

1 The Ontario Building Code utilizes the imperial measurement system (i.e. "feet") rather than the metric measurement system (i.e. "metres").

117


Council. The last such Appointment By-law, being By-law Number 2015-0023 (COU-1) was passed on February 18, 2015.

The Committee operates in accordance with the authority granted to it under the Planning Act. In addition to directing the scope of the Committee's authority, the Act also outlines the considerations that the Committee must have when making any decision on an application considered before it, and directs the administrative processes regarding notice of applications/decisions and hearing procedures. With the establishment of the Committee of Adjustment, Council has no ability to influence decisions of the Committee or to define the parameters of Committee business. The Committee is a quasi-judicial administrative tribunal appointed by Council that operates at arm's length from the Town's administration.

Pursuant to Section 45 of the Act, the established Committee is empowered to grant minor variances to any by-law that is passed under Section 34 or 38 of the Act (i.e. variances from a Zoning By-law or an Interim Control By-law); to permit the enlargement or extension of buildings/structures containing legal nonconforming uses; to permit the use of land, building or structures for "similar" uses to the existing non-conforming uses; and, to permit additional uses, where the uses permitted in the By-law are defined in general terms (refer to Sec. 45(1) and (2) of the Act). 2

The most frequent form of minor variance requests we receive are applications by the landowner (or agent thereof) seeking permission for relief from one or more provisions of the Zoning By-law when circumstances make it difficult to meet the standards established in the Zoning By-law. The variance may be required in order to obtain a building permit, to sell a property, or to seek relief from the standards of the by-law in order to recognize an existing deficiency or non-compliance with those standards.

In particular reference to applications for Minor Variance approval, pursuant to Section 45(1) of the Act:

"the committee of adjustment, upon application of the owner of any land, building or structure affected by any by-law that is in effect under section 34 or 38, or a predecessor of such sections, or any person authorized in writing by the owner, may despite any other Act, authorize such minor variance from the provisions of the by-law, in respect of the land, building or structure or use thereof, as in its opinion is desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or

2 The Act also allows Council to empower the Committee to grant minor variances from any other by-law which implements an Official Plan (ex. the Property Maintenance and Occupancy Standards By-law), but only through the passing of a separate by-law authorizing such additional powers under Sec. 45(3) of the Act; to date, no such by-law has been passed.

118


structure, if in the opinion of the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure, if in the opinion of the committee the general intent and purpose of the by-law and the official plan, if any, are maintained."

In determining whether to approve or refuse an application for a minor variance, the Committee considers each application under the following "four tests" and must make the determination:

1. whether the variance requested maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan;

2. whether the variance requested maintains the intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law;

3. that the variance is desirable for the appropriate and orderly development or use of the land, building or structure; and

4. that the variance, in the view of the Committee, is minor in nature.

In this regard, the Committee must be satisfied on each individual test or component, such that all four questions can be answered with a definitive "yes". Should the proposal fail on any one of the four components, the variance is denied.

Before discussing the test components, it is important to understand the inclusion of the word "may" within the context of the Committee's authority noted in Sec. 45(1) of the Act. The word "may" is permissive and infers a discretionary nature to the Committee's ability to decide as to whether or not grant a variance request, even if the test is satisfied. In this regard, beyond the four-prong test, the Committee is entitled to consider anything that reasonably bears on whether or not an application should be supported and the variance(s) granted.

Pursuant to historic process and practice, the municipal planners (i.e. the Planning Division) provides comment to the Committee on each application received by way of a staff report providing an evaluative analysis of the requested variance(s) against the four tests, and concluding opinion for the Committee's consideration. In effect, Planning staff are a commenting agency, and have no role to facilitate the processes or procedures established under the Planning Act that the Committee must comply with. The Committee considers not only the comments from the Planning Division (i.e. the report), but also the comments received from the public, external agencies and other internal staff, and is responsible for formulating their decision on the basis of their own analysis of the variance(s) against the four tests pursuant to the Act.

While the interpretation and application of the four tests has varied amongst Committees of Adjustment, and municipal planners, extensive case law has been established through decisions of the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) and through the courts on the meaning of the tests and how each is to be applied. Notwithstanding these various interpretations, the Committee must consider each

119


of the four requirements on every variance request, and through its analysis, explain the reasoning for its decision.

With respect to the first two tests, the Committee is required to consider and reach an opinion on whether the variance(s) sought would maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and of the Zoning By-law. In this regard, they are required to undertake an analysis of the relevant and respective policies and provisions of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to determine the general intent and purpose of same, and to consider whether the variance(s) sought would maintain that general intent and purpose.

The third test is whether each variance (either alone or together with the other variances being sought) is desirable for the appropriate and orderly development or use of the land, building or structure. The test is not simply whether the applicant thinks the variance is desirable, nor is it whether the variance is simply "compatible". But rather, desirability refers to whether the variance is desirable from a planning and public interest point of view. The test on desirability includes considering various factors that can affect the public interest as it relates to the subject property, such as the existing/proposed pattern of development and the impact on the surrounding neighbourhood. The desirability test is often connected with impact; whether the variance, if granted, will have an adverse impact on the surrounding area.

The fourth test is whether, in the view of the Committee, the variance is minor in nature. There is no test on "major" vs. "minor".

In considering the question of "minor" planners and lawyers often reference the 2005 Divisional Court case Vincent v DeGasperis3 ("DeGasperis" case). In the 2005 decision, the Court shed light on the four part variance test and referenced the Concise Oxford Dictionary in relation to the definition of "minor", by explaining that the term "minor" is something that is "lesser or comparatively small in size or importance" such that a variance could be more than minor "because it is too large to be considered minor, or, because it is too important to be considered minor". The decision further indicates that too often the "likely impact" of a variance is considered to be the only factor in determining whether it qualifies as minor, but in the Court's view, "impact is an important factor, but it is not the only factor''. In some circumstances, the variance could be too large to qualify as minor even if it would likely have no impact whatsoever on anyone or anything.

"Minor" is not determined on the basis of a mathematical calculation, such as a "small" change or minor in relation to physical size, magnitude, or impact, but rather, the concept of minor is considered flexible and its interpretation must be based on the unique circumstances of each application. Impact may relate to such

3 2005 Divisional Court Decision; Vincent v. DeGasperis, O.J. No. 2890

120


matters as loss of sunlight, reduced privacy, issues related to access, parking, vegetation loss or damage, drainage impacts, noise concerns, incompatibility with the established built form and character, impact on the visual aesthetics of the streetscape, etc. The principal consideration is the potential impact that the variance may have on neighbouring properties, both in the immediate area and in the general area, and whether that impact is considered to be minor or acceptable.

Every application before the Committee must satisfy each part of the test: (i) does it maintain the general intent and purpose of the official plan; (ii) does it maintain the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law; (iii) is it desirable for the appropriate use and development of the land, building or structure; and, (iv) is it minor in nature. While both Committee of Adjustment members and Planners seek guidance from past decisions through the Ontario Municipal Board and case law, one thing we are clear on is that the interpretation of what is minor cannot be determined through a checklist or a mathematical evaluation .


This report addresses the following strategic goals:

GOAL4: "Provide Exceptional Municipal Service"


There are no financial or budgeting impact resulting from this report.

8. CONCLUSION:

The minor variance process allows a property owner the opportunity to seek permission or relief from a specific provision (or multiple provisions) of the Town's zoning by-law by applying to the Committee of Adjustment. When an application for a minor variance is submitted, Planning Division staff undertake a review of the proposal and provide comments to the Committee by way of an evaluative report for their consideration. Ultimately, the decision to approve or refuse the variance request is under the jurisdiction of the Committee, who must be satisfied that any application for a minor variance satisfies all components of the four-prong test pursuant to the Planning Act.

Prepared by:

Velvet L. Ross, MCIP, RPP Manager of Planning

121


~b~= Harold W. Lenters, M.Sc.PI, MCIP, RPP Director of Development Services

7 March 2018

Approved by:

&vvv~-~ Winanne Grant, B.A. AMC , CEMC Chief Administrative Officer

Attachment 1 -February 14, 2018 Council Meeting Minutes (excerpt) Attachment 2- Section 6.1 -Zone Requirements for Single Family Dwellings (Zoning By-law No. 500)

122

=

February 14, 2018 M 13 29 2018-02-14


That Council endorse Town staff to work with Georgina Trades Training I . (GTTI) in its submission of an application to the Ontario Trillium Foundation eed Grant Investment Stream to deveiop a Social Enterprise Cafe Program at 1 e Link with a focus on providing employment readiness skills for persons with di bilities.

Carried.

(G) Catalina Blumenburg, Deputy Clerk, Townshi of Uxbridge, advising of its opposition to the implementation of four-way stop at the intersection of Ravenshoe Road and Re · nal Road 1.

Moved by Councillor Harding, Seconded by Re9i

RESOLUTION NO. C,-2018-0089

That correspondence from Catalina menburg, Deputy Clerk, Township of Uxbridge, advising of its opposition to e implementation of a four-way stop at the intersection of Ravenshoe Road an egional Road 1, be received.

Carried.

(2) Generallnformation

t General lnfonnation Item No. 13(2)(iv), being correspondence fro e Region of York respecting its report entitled 'Establishing Procedures for AI rnate Members of Council', be placed on the February 281h

Council Agenda r consideration.

Moved by C ncillor Biggerstaff, Seconded by Councillor Fellini

ION NO. C-2()18-0090

he General Information Items of February 141 2018 be received.

(3) Committee of Adjustment Planning Matters (A) Under RevieW · (B) Recommendati(Jns None. (C) Decisions ·

·Addendum Memo from Mamata Baykar, Secretary .. Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment respecting an amended status for Minor Varianee Application A40-17


123

February 14, 2018 M 14 30 2018-02-14

It was noted that concerns have been expressed by members of the public respecting new homes being constructed, larger homes beside smaller homes, lot coverage and height; staff will be submitting a written information report to Council concerning what is permitted through our current zoning by-law in terms of height and lot coverage and how the Minor Variance process operates through the Committee of Adjustment; what is considered minor and what is considered major.

Council noted approval being recommended for a Minor Variance application for a variance respecting a three-storey single detached dwelling past the 11 metre height requirement to 12.9 metres.



That the Committee of Adjustment Planning Matters for February 14, 2018 be received.

Carried.

14. MOTIONS/NOTICES OF MOTION None

15. REGIONAL BUSINESS

•All-way stop in Udora will be discussed by Regional Council tom

16. OTHER BUSINESS

(1) Christopher Raynor, Regional Clerk, Regi York, providing an update on the Upper York Sewage Solutions I idual Environmental Assessment Approval Status.

Mayor Quirk advised that a R nal report was before Regional Council on January 25th, 2018; it provid n update on the Upper York Sewage Solutions Individual Environmental essment initially submitted to the Province in July of 2014 and in the Provi s hands since that time; this and previous councils have expressed conce with the Upper York Sewage Solution. The Mayor has requested the gion to provide more details with regard to the Upper York Sewage Solution o eir website, to provide a more thorough history of the Upper York, the

tional capacity for East Gwillimbury, Newmarket and Aurora was first re ed, the legislation in place, the lack of ability to construct another sewage

eatment plant on Lake Simcoe, the desire to expand the York-Durh~m system, the


.. · .

124

Page 6-2

SECTION 6 - ZONE REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES (cont.)

6.1 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS

(a) LOT FRONTAGE (MINIMUM)

RU Zone 180 metres

Other Zones 30 metres

- except that in an R1 or R2 Zone where the lot is served by sanitary sewers, the minimum frontage shall be 15 metresi and,

- in the case of a corner lot in an R1 or R2 Zone, where the lot is served by sanitary sewers, the minimum frontage shall be 18 metres.

Notwithstanding the lot frontage requirements as set forth above, where a lot is created by consent as defined herein and has a lesser frontage than required, the minimum lot frontage requirement shall be deemed to be the lot frontage of such lot as created by consent .

Further, notwithstanding the frontage requirements set forth above, the minimum frontage for lots fronting on Highway 48 shall be 45 metres.

(b) LOT AREA (MINIMUM)

RU Zone 20 hectares

ER Zone 6 000 sq metres

R Zone 4 000 sq metres

R1 or R2 Zones 450 sq metres

- except that in the case of a corner lot in an R1 or R2 Zone, where a lot is served by sanitary sewers, the minimum lot area shall be 540 sq metres.

Notwithstanding the lot area requirements as set forth above, where a lot is created by consent as defined herein and has a lesser area than required,


125

Page 6-3


the minimum lot area requirement shall be deemed to be the area of such lot as created by consent.

(c) FRONT YARD (MINIMUM)

RU Zone

lots less than 4 000 sq m lots 4 000 sq m up to 4.0 ha lots 4.0 ha or greater

ER Zone

R Zone

lots less than 4 000 sq m lots 4 000 sq m or greater

R1 and R2 Zones

10 metres 15 metres 30 metres

15 metres

8 metres 10 metres

6 metres

except that in the case of a lot fronting on Highway 48 1 the minimum front yard shall be 7. 5 metres.

(d) EXTERIOR SIDE YARD (MINIMUM)

RU Zone

lots less than 4 000 sq m lots 4 000 sq m up to 4.0 ha lots 4.0 ha or greater

ER Zone

R Zone

lots less than 4 000 sq m lots greater than 4 000 sq m

10 metres 15 metres 30 metres

15 metres

7 metres 9 metres

- except that in the case of a lot flanking Highway 48 1 the minimum exterior side yard shall be 7. 5 metres for lots less than 4 000 sq metres.

R1 and R2 Zones 5 metres


126

Page 6-4


(500-97-056)

- except where a driveway, providing access to an attached garage or carport, is located in the exterior side yard, the minimum exterior side yard for the garage or carport shall be 6 metres.

- except that in the case of a lot flanking Highway 48, the minimum exterior side yard shall be 7. 5 metres.

(e) REAR YARD (MINIMUM)

RU, ER, and R Zones 12 metres

R1 and R2 Zones 8 metres

(f) INTERIOR SIDE YARD (MINIMUM)

RU and ER Zones 9 metres

- except that in an RU Zone, an interior side yard may be reduced to 3 metres when the exterior wall facing said yard contains no habitable room windows or where the lot is less than 4 000 sq metres.

R Zone

- 1.2 metres on one side, plus 0.5 metres for each additional or partial storey above the first and, 2.5 metres on the other side.

R1 and R2 Zones

- 1.2 metres plus 0.5 metres for each additional or partial storey above the first. Where there is not an attached garage or carport on a lot, the minimum interior side yard on one side shall be 2.5 metres.

(g) FLOOR AREA (MINIMUM)

RU Zone

ER Zone

Other Zones

112 sq metres

140 sq metres


127

Page 6-5


(500-96-037)

lots less than 4 000 sq m lots 4 000 sq m or greater

(h) FLOOR AREA (MAXIMUM)

- Deleted in en tirety -

( i) LOT COVERAGE (MAXIMUM)

100 sq metres 112 sq metres

RU Zone where lot is greater than 4 000 sq m and in ER Zone 10%

RU Zone where lot is less than 4 000 sq m

R, R1 and R2 Zones

20%

30%

Other Zones as set forth therein

(j) HEIGHT OF BUILDING (MAXIMUM)

All Zones 11 metres

(k) NUMBER OF SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS PER LOT

All Zones

provided that in a RU Zone minimum area of 40 hectares, an family dwelling is permitted. dwelling shall:

1 only

on a lot with a additional single

Such additional

i) be separated from the principal dwelling by a minimum of 30 metres;

ii) use the same entrance to the street as the principal residence; and,

iii) comply with all other requirements of Section 6.1 hereof.

provided that, in R1 and R2 zones the maximum number of pre-registration dwellings shall not exceed 20% of the total number of single family dwellings which are to be built on proposed lots


128

Page 6-6


6.2

which have been draft plan of subdivision approved for the subject parcel.

(1) LIVESTOCK OPERATION SETBACK

In a RU Zone, any new single family dwelling shall be located a minimum of 60 metres from any livestock building or manure storage facility.

ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, USES, PARKING, PLANNED WIDTH OF STREET ALLOWANCE, AND ALL OTHER GENERAL PROVISIONS

In accordance with the provisions of Sections 5 hereof.

SEMI-DETACHED DWELLING

(a) LOT FRONTAGE PER UNIT (MINIMUM) 10 metres

except that in the case of a corner lot, the minimum lot frontage for the exterior dwelling unit shall be 13 metres.

except that in the case of a lot fronting on Highway 48, the minimum lot frontage per unit shall be 22.5 metres.

(b) LOT AREA PER UNIT (MINIMUM) 300 sq metres

except that in the case of a corner lot, the minimum lot area for the exterior dwelling unit shall be 390 sq metres.

(c) FRONT YARD (MINIMUM) 6 metres

except that in the case of a lot fronting on Highway 48, the minimum front yard shall be 7. 5 metres.

(d) EXTERIOR SIDE YARD (MINIMUM) 5 metres

- except where a driveway, providing access to an attached garage or carport, is located in the exterior side yard, the minimum exterior side yard


129




APRIL 4, 2018

SUBJECT: ASSUMPTION OF VARIOUS ROADS WITHIN PHASES 7A AND 78 PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 19TG-2003-001 SIMCOE LANDING SUBDIVISION REGISTERED PLAN 65M-4347 (PHASE 7 A) REGISTERED PLAN 65M-4368 (PHASE 7B)

1. RECOMMENDATION:

1. That Council receive Report DS-2018-0045 prepared by the Development Engineering Division, Development Services Department dated April 4, 2018 respecting the assumption of various roads within Phase 7 of the Simcoe Landing Subdivision on Registered Plan 65M-4347 (Phase 7 A) and Registered Plan 65M-4368 (Phase 7B).

2. That Schedule "A" to By-law 94-60 (PW0-2) be further amended to assume various roads within the Simcoe Landing Subdivision on Registered Plan 65M-4347 (Phase 7 A) and Registered Plan 65M-4368 (Phase 7B).

3. PURPOSE:

... /2

The purpose of this report is to recommend the adoption of a by-law to assume various roads within the Simcoe Landing Subdivision on Registered Plan 65M-4347 (Phase 7A) and Registered Plan 65M-4368 (Phase 78).

The location plan is provided as Attachment 1 and the plans of subdivision for Simcoe Landing Phase 7 A and 78 are included as Attachments 2 and 3 respectively .

130

Page 2 of Report DS-2018-0045

4. BACKGROUND:

On July 12, 2012 the Town of Georgina entered into a Subdivision Agreement with Camlane Holdings Inc., Grangemuir Developments Inc. and Carness Developments Inc. respecting the development of fifty six (56) lots on Registered Plan 65M-4347, known as Phase 7A of the Simcoe Landing Subdivision, a copy of this plan is included as Attachment 2. On October 29, 2012 the Town of Georgina entered into a Subdivision Agreement with Camlane Holdings Inc., Grangemuir Developments Inc. and Carness Developments Inc. respecting the development of one hundred and fifty-six (156) lots on Registered Plan 65M-4368 known as Phase 78 of the Simcoe Landing Subdivision, a copy of this plan is included as Attachment 3. All public works have now been completed to this Department's satisfaction.

5. ANALYSIS:

The various roads within Phase 7 Simcoe Landing Subdivision built by the developers have been constructed as a condition of subdivision approval and are generally acceptable for assumption purposes.


.. ./3

The development of any subdivision road has the financial impact expected of additional municipal infrastructure to maintain. Initially these are the responsibility of the developer but ultimately become the responsibility of the Town to carry out all appropriate maintenance. It is expected that this maintenance cost will now be captured in future budget requirements. The Town has benefitted from the revenue generated through the development review and building permit processes and ongoing tax generation .

131

Page 3 of Report DS-2018-0045

7. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND NOTICE REQUIREMENT:

No public notice or consultation is specifically required for the purpose of this report.

8. CONCLUSION:

It is respectfully submitted that it is appropriate to assume the various roads within Phase 7 of the Simcoe Landing Subdivision on registered Plans 65M-4347 (Phase 7 A) and 65M-4368 (Phase 78) to facilitate municipal infrastructure maintenance operations.

p~ Darren Dunphy, C.E.T., rcji Development Engineering Technologist

Recommended by:

~CIP,RPP Director of Development Services

Attachment 1 - Location Plan Attachment 2 - Plan of Subdivision - Phase 7 A Attachment 3 - Plan of Subdivision - Phase 78

Reviewed by:

Zaidun AI anabi, M.Eng, P.Eng. Manager of Development Engineering

Approved by:

Wina~~~. AMCT, CEMC Chief Administrative Officer

132

c 0 0

A A

l\

v I

Reporl DS-2018-0045 Attachment 1 Location Plan

133

Bardawill Avenue Bostock Drive Grey Wing Avenue Hickory Ridge Street Paulgrave Avenue

I'

, .

I P~AN 6:M- 1 13~.~ ' ~~ · ~·

J.l/IJd !)I lOiS 2 t.~~U J CCNCESSION 3

TOWN OF GEORGINA

'"OAQ.'II..t0 11N.lf1\IIH~t.

.. 1/v

...... ~~· .... • 1-

Reporl DS-2018-0045 Attachment 2

Plan of Subdivision- Phase 7 A (65M-4347)

134

""TlC:O ...., c ~Q. s:' Dl co fJJCO oco ::J!a oo ~-CD < (JJ CD ()

CD ;::!.

_ .. ·. '":,

"'•.-.=-...;..:..

:~tjj_J -=-- . t . -"- -· . __ ._:-_- _-.-;··

~~---

- .::.!-

_llf"ooro..• f!----

•I

l 0-

i I

135




APRIL 4, 2018

SUBJECT: MOURNING DOVE ROAD EXTENSION REQUEST LOT 259, PLAN 427

1. RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. That Council receive Report DS-2018-0046 prepared by the Development Engineering Division, Development Services Department dated April 4, 2018 respecting an application for extension of Mourning Dove Road.

2. That the request to extend Mourning Dove Road across the frontage of Lot 259, Plan 427 be approved and Council adopt a by-law authorizing the the Mayor and Clerk to execute a Development Agreement made between Thomas & Pernille Bojin, as the Owners, and the Corporation of the Town of Georgina relating to the extension of Mourning Dove Road.

2. PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to recommend adoption of a by-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute the necessary development agreement to facilitate the extension of Mourning Dove Road abutting Lot 259, Plan 427.

3. INFORMATION:

OWNERS/APPLICANT: Thomas & Pernille Bojin

AGENT: Gunnell Engineering Ltd .

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 259, Plan 427

FILE NUMBERS: Mourning Dove Road

136


4. BACKGROUND:

An application for development of Lot 259, Plan 427 on Mourning Dove Road dated July 27, 2017 was received by the Development Engineering Division. The subject property is zoned Residential (R) in accordance with Zoning By-law No. 500 and does not have a municipal address.

The property does not front on a road or street and as per section 5.13 of Zoning By-Law No.500, "No person shall erect any building or structure in any zone unless the lot upon which such building or structure is to be erected fronts upon a public street, except:

a) In a registered plan of subdivision for which there exists a valid subdivision agreement, but the streets have not yet been assumed, or

b) In respect of a lot which does not front on a public street and which contains a legally existing building, in which case such building may be enlarged, reconstructed, repaired, renovated or replaced in accordance with section 5. 11 and accessory buildings may be erected, or

c) In respect of a lot where a street has been constructed to a standard approved by the Town for assumption, but where the Town has not yet assumed the street."

As per exemption (c) in order to develop the property the Owners are required to upgrade the existing gravel/dirt road to the Town of Georgina rural paved road design standard.

The entire road extension is 21.66 metres long in order to extend the paved road along the frontage of the property that is to be developed. The road extension has to be designed to accommodate the existing paved road, while also accommodating the existing drainage patterns.

5. ANALYSIS:

Comments regarding the first submission package were provided to the applicant, the second submission package is expected upon LSRCA review.

The next submission drawing package will include the updated geotechnical report and updated drawings adhering to the Extension of Existing Roads or Upgrading Unassumed Roads Policy, Policy No. RD-16 of the Town of Georgina.

The Town will require the Owners to convey a 6 metre easement over a portion of the owners lands (end of driveway) to facilitate appropriate turning manoeuvers for snow ploughs, garbage trucks and emergency vehicles.

Town staff have reviewed the documents and drawings provided by the applicant and it is expected that the applicant will address all internal department and external agency comments prior to providing a subsequent submission for

137


circulation with the intent of finalizing all plans. The draft agreement is included as Attachment 4.

The Development Agreement is to be executed by the Owners prior to execution of same by the Town. The owners, their agent or solicitor will provide the necessary schedules for this agreement to the Town's satisfaction. The execution of the Development Agreement is in accordance with the standard development practices of the Town and supports new development in a timely fashion and orderly manner.


This report and the development proposed herein addresses the following strategic goals:

GOAL 1: "Grow Our Economy"- SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH AND EMPLOYMENT

GOAL 2: "Promote a High Quality of Life" - HEAL THY, SAFE, SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES


The development of any road has the financial impact expected of additional municipal infrastructure to maintain. Initially these are the responsibility of the developer, but ultimately become the responsibility of the Town to carry out all appropriate maintenance.


Public consultation and notice is not required, however, a notice has been circulated to 33 Mourning Dove Road, Lot 258, Plan 427, who had requested to be circulated on this development application.

9. CONCLUSION:

The Owners are proceeding in a reasonable manner to address all internal department and external agency comments and is close to finalizing the design to the satisfaction of all agencies having jurisdiction with the development.

It is respectfully submitted that it is appropriate to enter into the Development Agreement with the proponent and that a by-law should be passed authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to execute the agreement accordingly.

138


Darren D phy, C.E.T., rcji Development Engineering Technologist

Recommended by:

~P,RPP Director of Development Services

Attachment 1 - Location Map Attachment 2 - Aerial Map

Submitted by:

~ ~ zaidlJn i anabi, M.Eng, P. Eng. Manager of Development Engineering

Approved by:

Winanne rant, B. . , AMCT, CEMC Chief Administrative Officer

Attachment 3 - Proposed Mourning Dove Road Extension Attachment 4 - Draft Development Agreement

139

SUBJECT LAND

j

4 I

~ /

I I


~\

Sl88ALO POINT Pl?0111NCit',[ PAl?K

"'- __ ... -'-'"-""" "'---- -

~, v ..

l-l~ ~ :1:

~ 2 ... !II :! ., "' ! 's:' !!l : g

/ r

Report DS-2018-0046 Attachment 1

140



141

;;c CD "0 0 ;:::).

)>0 ~C(> Q>N {)0 :::::r ....>.

3Cf CDO :::JO ...... .j:>. w (J)

ccml: ~::: ...,,,~ =:."'r'O~<.::O.OIIIM ~r~~ ''!"lt'' -i !l_.r !h~ p·r.:~:;;?..,.-::!d ojr:•,-.;·'Ot:<l;m: (l'lo7•,o~l" ;:ll"oJ C ~~~W;!~·] ,;., llr.lrTiU:-:'1 d ~~ .1 T.'

L'>" ~t:n:;_'?:!r ~•I•::J, ;,;•~ I!;" rr.r;r •IT-<11Mnn•1~:11o:el c.' frl br r::1~d C"~lCn::.ir.f"l ,. .. ::r~-;; ~--.a jt;;••".? ''l:l'lt-rtl u •r :Jr:J~e1·, •~eHhn 1'~·;Jt!:..Jiai: all! .:I ~, Th:•cl::n: .:1!0~;11 r:•l !.<7" 4-"!1' Jf (.(ll!lc-:""~~~~Of"· ::-..:1 n;~~ b~r-1 .;)'.:lvd~:l w:illr•r :'"~~? fl:.:•JJ~,;·\.:i'l ~r~oll ~ 1..11"1:1 L'l~: I ::22. "[• t:h:~'o-;!iClr'.l :m:: I'E 91t11::.~Jnt F."'!~ tr) C13',...1JI!J S~~ 1 h:::r r:cr.-~;~._,!1:-'fi \•rhmo:- 1~10011~

-- ------ - ·- ·- ·- --- - ·---- - - ·- ·- - - ·- - -- - - ·- -- - -

/ I

I .....

--~-- ... M.:~:;,;,.~ \o

rr.a:21 ·:..!r:f>P.

--- ---t.·- ... ~- . - ..

•,

-- -- -- ..J

~- -- .. ·-- -,.

I ---I I

~ ~ "' {

·'

I

I

:'-~:1";, P.u<ji ,.,.,1 =•.,.··:t,l•• [le•.;,l·~••- ;>:": ' •i ~-~~·~ "'liO I""'t.or ·:;,,; ~o:>..l,;;. o::. t !, ,~.;.,.-,.,..,,. -:-I!I~"C!O! Ill I;C 22· Fl"111; a=·l'!'l~ ~~l!

;)~..::._·;' :11 .:•~' 1P~o;11':; l lhlo , :t~ p:-·( ~ 1.:,: t." ]ille<""~~

.....

- · ...... ~ - ....::.

·· ·-.

M:.:i ; .. ,J T·rr• .~ ;.:;;, ;:;.. •-tJ Go•, r·~ ::)iCH~r ,;c; :~-, -~f' nl r:-~-·:Hi)l'"i

~·1·~-~-~.,.···::.~r.--~

Limit of Corn; !ruction

l#'·6..! __ _________ ..,.__ ___ _ ? ,.3~

~~.. ~j .... - --- -,----- ----- -

" Ex1s.ting Mourning §' Dov~ Rd. 2

- - - # " - ----

~LI"'•" I :;::!l :.!fl'E~ f:;,.,:~.::rlt:CI;,-,.,.,,~IJT . <

Extension to Mourning Dove Rd. (>: 21 66~ Long)

- ,:\.' .y. . ~_:.:_==_j;~;:; __ -_-_-:_=_=_::;_;_~;?;..!~J~£~-~-~-~~;~~~~~::'~::,;;-~-~-~-~~-:::;;;:::~::=.-:~:.=_ -=======:=_=_:::_ ~~ ..... ~,==~~= ~ ~\.._$', ~:r~: -~~~~~ r:Lj ._ __ __ -- -------~~-&:,-~ ... -

- · Ul~ ... ~~ .. c.:;P ... ~ .

='rco::C!Il. (C!rtr.:Ji-,~ :; ':t" ,~ h~ t., =?•.· ·:'II,,..,.,. l ~I :'! ' ·0"{ ,.:.:.~ .l ·~

~·il~l!'t •. t:"' f.-,~.- Et:•;~ -J ::?'l:~.:f.!.t.~·

- .... ,:>:>'";Jr"l ::.~-.~~.-.;:3"1

l.:i, ,, f--\.-;' ~ ~ ....... -

::::r: ::r. ""~~

:. ,UK;,U~ \.

Road EJCtension Plan S<..lo. I ' (I)

., .. ,:l;-.r4 Eo'!;.:ll~

'"" .C· ----

:~,.,.-,..'In;;. C:tk:!" ",q' : ,., o:r!o; ... O"""'l.~'' ::f!' 1'1":11"'l

--[.~ .. "'·'.::; •.:'!•·•: ..

142

THIS AGREEMENT mmre m triplicate. on the day of • 20 8

BETWEEN:

and -

THOMAS :BOJIN, of the Town of Georgina, in tbe Regiooal "cipality v~. Province of Ontario

PERNILLE BOJIN, or the Town of Georgma, in the Regional un".cipality Yoo, P rovince of Ontario

hereinafter ca~ tile "'WNERS" Of THE FIRST PART:

TtE CORPORATION Of THE TOWN Of GEORGINA In lhe Regional Muf!lclpolityofYork

hereinafter called the "TO\oVN" OF THE SECOND PART:

WHEREAS the Owners won'allt that lhey are lhe registered 0\mern of l ot 259, PI<Wt 427, Mouming Dove Road, as more partiwfarty descnbed in Sdledule "A" hereto;

NO'IIV THEREFORE lliiS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH lila! in coosideration of the prenises and o~ V<Wable consicleralion and of mUiual c:ovena and agreemerns hereincontaitle, the parties hereto agree with each .wHh the o1her as folloWs~

Construction of Roads and Services

The QM)e[9 agree to construct Moumiog Dove Road abutting lhe s~ randS 110 an assumable slandartl and to coostrucl al a the expense of lhe OM:Iers.. ~ completion of lhe roadwolks a t'l\0 (2) year maintenance periOd commence a that tJme the ~llity can be re1easec1

PJior to the issuance of a buik!ing pennit lor a dweling on the subject loC !he well and .septic s~s shaU be hlly useable and the OMlers Sllal make arrangements to pro-.;oe hydro electric poo.wr, naturnt gas, telephone and cable 1V seNCe to the sWject land an at no cost to the TOWTI.

No shall be CC~~alructed wilhm the mlilicipaf road aBowlilce wilboul. the pic:¥ approval of lhe Town.

2 Sne A lteration Permit

The ONnel:s agree to provide the To!Ml, prior to lhe issuance of lhe bullding permit lOr a dwelling on the subject klt a site alteratiofl application and s.Wsequen drav.ings prepared by U~ O#.mern' consulting engineer estabflSI:lin!J lhe proposed gracfmg of the lands to provide for proper dra.iil:age Ulereot and dra.inBge o( al adjacer~t lands which drain through the said de •elopn'lent

The ·re a erotioo penni1 application is o be prepar:e(l m a£cord;:mc.e .th lhe Town's s· e Afterati.on By-law No. 2011-0044 (REG- 1) and as lllll1ef1ded by By-Law No. 2014-0048 (REG- ), ·n effect at the dale or this Agreemen The grading of the lands sh be carried out in general accordance with suoll Site Af!eration Pem1 . If, in the opinion of the Director of Development SeNices, drainage tProblems occur p or to Final Accepta ce of the r03d works by lhe Town, the Owners agree to correct


Page 1 of 9

143

these by regrading « by construction of catch -basins, swales, retaining walls, break walls or other structures as may be necessary to conect such problems ..

The Owners agree to opsoi] and sod tile ditches and bOulevards and to topsoil and sod each of the lots upon con pletion of lhe construction of ruldings lhereon. A minimum of 150mm .of Copsoil shall be placed on all disturbed areas.

3 Baildlng Requi rements

The OMlers coveR:lllt aoo agree that once •buidilg permits have been issued, not ro pemit ~ancy of any blDiing, or part thereof, un1i the folla.IMrlg req~.~irements ~ lbeef\ fulfilled, all to lhe salisfadion d the Director of Devdcpment SeMiles:

(a) The wo1t1 ,for ·tMlOCh 1he lbuildilg permlt was ~oecl )s ClOfTlPieted ·n accordartee lhe reqt~ilemem of the OntOOo Building Code Act (latest revisions. lhereo1), Building By-raws, as amended, and In accordance to thec:oodidiollS set OtJt by ltle-Town;

(b) AD ct.vellings shall be f1.l1ished with a roonidpaE house nwmer, as assigned to the dwellling by the TCMtJ. and same nas been permanen11y affilc.ed on the froA'I of lhe dwelling and 00'1inaled in .such a mamer as ~ be visible mn lhe s1reet

4 BuJdi!q Permits

Prior to the issuance ot a ooildfng permit 1he OWr)ers «shall:

(a)

{b)

5

:Provide the T a.vn WI .a cash deposit or letter of Dedi •in the amount ,of lwenly five h1111d'red dollars (S2.500.00) per sirlg!e f3{l1ij dwelling lot ·~ guaranree OOil!Jlletion of the ~·or saki lot i"' accordartee with the Sie Aleration Penni;

The o.vners, shall retain a profes$ooal engiooer to ensure that the gradirlQ and scddilrlg for lh.e site altemlion peTmi is completed Co the satisfaclioo of lhe Director of Development Services, within one year of da1e d issu311W of the building permt. The OWners hereby ack~ge lhe T()IINI1's right, notiMU'lst:!nd"~ng ;my o1her remedies it may ha~ to draw ~n ~ seo.llity it my hold and ~ enter onto the lot upon default and pedonnanywo.rl<.itdeems.necessal)', all al ene cost .of -.eOM!efs.

Where caupa11cy occurn llel'Men Nowmber 1" and JJ.I1e 1'\ topsOil and SClddilg sha/l lle oai11Jieled poor to July 1"' next ensuing.

Where occupancy occurs between .lJne 2"~ and October 31111,

topsoil ad soddirlQ shall be COOlP!eted witlm thirty (30) days of ocxupancy, proWled, llowe\ler, 1tla ocrupancy shall permitted only upon ~ and acceplmce of the lltermgracing certllicale as af«emerffioned.

6 Aooroyals

No~stmdirlg anything herein coo1ai"led, the Tov.n shall net be obligated under this agreement lrillhe Ta.vn or ltle Owners has o!J(alned any aoo· all approvals required b be obtaiiled from the Regional Municipality of York, Mlmstry of NaCuraJ Resooroes, Ministry of Cilirenstlip, Culll.re and Recrea.ti.co a.nd 1t1e Lall.e Sfmcoe Region Cal5elv-adion Authority and nothing


Page 2 of 9

144

herein shall relieve the Owners fi"om Gblal~ 311 approvals and consents required by MY governmental aulhotity.

7 LawU Levies and Rales

The o..mers further oodertake and agree to pay all taxes levied, or to be revied, on the said lands on the basis and ,in accordance with the assessment al1d oolllecfors roll enitries Wlli such time as tile kmd herein being developed has been assessed and, entered on the oonectof's roll according to the Registered f?larL

Interest sl)al be payable lby the Dwnern to the Town on~ sums of mooey payable under this .Agreemef11. vmit.h are rn paid wilhin thirty (30) days from the due date. The mle of merest payable sllaU be lteen per cent (15%) per anrun

8 Liability Insurance

Prior to execution of this Agreement by tt.e Town, the Owners covenants .and agrees o supp'y tile Town:

a) Genera Liability lnsu~e in tile amount or Frve illiQn Dollars (SS,OOO,O(KUJO) in a fom:a satisfactory to the Town, inctuding but not limited to coverage for bodily injury incJud'ing d eath, personal injury, property damage induding loss of use tllereot. a oon.owned autom<lbile iabili:ty. The policy sttall contain a cross-liability and severability of interest clause, protecting lhe Town against claims by the OwneJS as if it were separately insured a11d providing tllat the Town shall be insured ~ng any breach of any condltio"in the policy by any olher insured. The Town shall be named as an addilional insured_

b) AJI policies shall be endorsed to provide the Town wi nol less than tllirty (30) days' written notice of coocellat1on.

c) Jn the event that the Owners fails to maintain insurance as reqtlired tile Town shall have the right to provide and maintain such insurance and the OIIIR~ mLts.t pay ail costs to tfle Town within fourteen (14) days.

d) Evidence of insurance must be satisfactory to the Town and shall be provided prior to the signing of the Agreement and shaD remain in effect unbl such time as final assumptiOn.

The Owners may be required to prollide and maintain additional insuraoce coverage(s), related to this Agreement, as 'reasonably delem ined by the Town.

9 Indemnification

The OWners cov-enants af)d agrees to iildenmily and save harmles::~ the Town and each of ids offieers, employees, agents and elected and appointed officials from and against 311 claims, dema!lds, losses, damages, costs (mOOing reasonable legal costs), actions and other proceedings made, sustained, brough prosecuted, threatened to be brought Of" prosecuted in any manner based upoo, occasioned by or aUributable to an injury to or deattl of a person or damage to or loss of property, infringement of rights or any other loss Of" damages wha1soever, alising in relation tot/toe coflStructioo of any and all of the worts and services in tne !IObdivision or by reason of the maintenance or lack of maintenance of such wotks or services h>l the OWners pUI'Su.ar1 to the


Page 3 of 9

145

terms of th!s Agreement from tile date of ~meot of any wor11s or services until final acceptance of llie 9li'bclivision..

10 Oevelooment Charges and Pat Lew

The 0\!tners .acknowledge at a Oerelopment Charge and PaT1t Levy Shall be ,payable on the lot wtithin ,t'he ~klject land$, pfor to the issLJa!Jce of a building permit fa said ld.. The Development Charge shall be calculaled at the time ,of pa"Yf!'leot in accordance wilh all applicable bylaws passed pursuant to the Development Chatpes Act. 199-7, and any amendments there o.

11 Repair of Qamaoed Public ' ofiks oo Adioinioo Lands

The OWners covenant and agee 'that all streets abutting lands, as so· des>cn"bed in the regis1ered plan of survey, and to be used for access during the conslnlction o~ any IOOuse or J)uilclirlg andfo~ ror the construction of public V«>Tts, shaD be maintained in good. and usable condition during tlile period of .tile said oollStruclion. If any a<fJOlning 'land or public works Is damaged by lfle 0M"tefS, oc palties emptoyed by tt1e OWners, in COMtruction of tile said '1Mlf1ts, Of' by builders so employed, lhe Owners win repalr and restore inTmedialel),o_ Alllrucks makiog delivery(s) to or laking rnateools to or from 1he :subjec b !lds, shall .be adequately covered and not unreasonably loaded so as scatter refuse, rubbish or deb;ris on tlile said streets abutting;_

12 Cleaning and Sweeping of Streets

The OM:lers covenanls and agrees to maintain all roads in a Olean alld reasonable oondloon throughoo . the period of house construction and shall provide lhe necessary labour and equipment to do so on a daily basts, ~ as required by the Oirecb" of Development SeJvjces_ If, in the opinion of the DirectDr c« DevelpJllDefll Sewices such roads do not meet with these requirements, then the wofk may be done by the Town .at the Owner's eX~pense:.

13 Inspection of Wortts

The TOMl, by its of:fioers, seMJnts. employees and ageo!s• may enter on 1t1e said lands orpmts thereof ami any building(s) erected thereon to efl&lre the proper compliance of any works required to be COilSiruded by the Owners.

If at any tine the .callSiructioo of lbe WOOls lis, Withe opitDt of lbe Director of Development SeFYices, ncll::leing C3f1ied out in atcOfdance with good el'l!jneemg practice,. lhen ftle Dmtor o1 Developmen SeM:ces may stop f~ cmstrudion of am or any part:of the works for; any reaoonable tengltl of time Ulltil suc.h WOOl have beeta ~lin sa'lmactoJY rondlion

14 Reaistralion on Tille

The 0\MllefS llereby oavmant and agree lhat Dis ~nt ancllhe schedules hereto 01 any pares. tlbereof may be registered upon the title to the 'lands wiltWl tile said devetopmenl Sudl registmlion sha11 be a1 the W!stance of 1heTO'Ml and ails oole and absdu1e oocretlort

15 Director or Devetopme11 Sesvices

I m mdei!S1ood and agreed ClliB4 villfmwer Ule '&elm 'Director of Oeve1opment Servlces' is referred to in Chis agreement or lhe sdledules attached hereto, it shaD mean the Director of Oeve!apment Services fur 1he


Page 4 of 9

146

Corporation of tf1e Town of Georgina or peroons so deSigl"'81ed ID ad on his behalf.

The ONne!S covenan1 and. agreed to reimb.~ne the town for all the Town's legal and engineering expenses 1..1pon~ of this Agreement.

16 Special ProviSions

The OWnel's shall, prior 10 applying fa a buikfing permit, convey to 1he Town, free of rost and tree Of all encuml:lranc:es, .an easemen over lhal part of the l..ar)ds l!}a 1s design& Ed as a certain IX3fl on a deposited :R-Plan to penTiit turning maneuvers of snow l*luQhs, garbage trucks and emergency vehicles. The Transfer of Easemen shall be in a form satisfactory to the Town Solicitor.

Prior to OCQJPan.cy of 1t1e dwelli1g 1o be .cooslnJded on the lands, ·ltle OWnel's shal construct an adequale drivew~ •o pemlit the fuming maneuvers referred 1o il lhe above paragraj:h

17 Address of TOIMI, 0\Mlers & Consulting Eooineet"

If any rl01ioe is re<J)ited 1o be given b;r the TO\WI to lhe OM!ers and/or their oollSUtilg engineer with respect to 11\is agreefl"IOO sucll notice sl:lall be mailed or delivered to:

(a) Town:

Corporation of 1he Town of Geocgha 26557 Civic Centre ·Road. R.R. 2 Keswidl:, Ontario, l4P 3G1 Attention: John Espinosa, Town Olef1t Phone: 905-476-4301 FaiC 905-476-8100

(b) C>.Yne:rs:

Thomas & Pem·ne Bofm 78 Rose Stree RR2 Sutton, Ontario, LOE 1RO Phone: 416-560-7159

(c) Consultant

Gunnel Engineering 1110 Stellar Dfive, Unit 106 Newmar1c:et, Ontario, l3Y 787 Attention: Eric Gunne , P. Ellg. Phone: 905-868-'9400 Fa · 905-853-5734

or Sllch other addresses of which !:be Owners a.ndlor .c;onsul1mg eng1neer has notified the Director of t:nmneering and PUbl c arks in wnting and any such no ·ce maJl ed or ddivered sha be deemed good and sufficient notice under the terms of 'this agreement. All notices. demands or requests shal be deemed lo have bee p~~ en delivered personally or sent by prepaid mai • If not ce IS given by , the .same sha be effective five (5) business days after bej:ng depos" ~ wi II the post office.


Page 5 of 9

147

18 Ust of Sdledul~

Sehe<!ule 'A' being a description of lhe lands to be oevei!Oped.

Sched e '8' being a schedule of worl!s to be constructed by4he Owners.

Sdledule 'C' being a schedule or lhe financial provislolls.

IT IS HEREBY DECLARED 111at 1llis agreement alld the covenants, p rovisos, eoncfrtions and ·sdledules herein contained shall be binding upon and ensute beflefrt of 111e pasties hereto, their successotS and assigns.

1 WHENEVER the .siJlgular and masctJIIne are used

throughou this agreement, tfle same shall be collSlrued as meaning 111e plural or feminine or neuter wllefe the context ol the parties hereto reqt1ire.

WITNESS lhe hands and corporate seals o lhe parties hereto, attested to by lhe. hands of their proper sigJling o cern d lly authorized in that behalf, day first above written .

) OWNERS )

) ~---------------------~ Name: Pemille Boj"n )

) ~~=---~~-----------) ame: Thomas Bojin ~ ) ) THE CORPORATION OFTHETOWNOF ) GEORGINA )

) ~------~~--------------) Margaret Ouilk, Mayor ) )

) ~---~~,---=-~~-------) John Espinosa, <tM~n Cle!'k ) ) lfWe have the authority o bind the Corpomtion.


Page 6 of 9

148

SCHEDULE 'A'

BEING A BOUNDARY (LEGAL) DESCRIPTION OF THE LANDS TO BE DEVELOPED

THOSE CERTAIN LANDS situate in lhe Town of Georgina, in the Regional Municipality of York (former geographic Township of Georgina) and being composed of the following:

Lot 259, Plan 427

---To be provided by Owner·-

Development Agreement (Re: Mourning Dove Road E>densfon)


Page 7 of9

149

SCHEDULE 'B'

WORKS TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY THE OWNER OR OWNER'S CONSULTANT

(a) GRADING & DRIVEWAYS:

Construction of the grading of all lots as indicated on the Site Plan and to the satisfaction of the Director Development Services.

The Owner covenants and agrees to place asphalt makeup equivalent to the road, from the edge of the existing paved road to the north lot line of the lands as well as the first 6 meters into the driveway in accordance with the Town's 'Development Design Criteria', as amended.

Prior to occupancy of any dwelling, the granular base shall be installed and compacted on the driveway in accordance with the Town's 'Development Design Criteria', as amended.

(b) SODDING:

Construction of sodding of all lots where the turf has been disturbed and/or where there is no turf with the exception of those areas that are hard surfaced or similarly finished by landscaping.

(c) RESTORATION:

All disturbed areas within the municipal right-of-way shall be restored to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services

(d) SILT AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS:

All si~ and sediment controls shall be installed as per the reviewed plans and shall be in place prior to the start of construction. All si~ and sediment controls shall remain in place and be maintained until all disturbed areas have been stabilized,

Development Agreement (Re: Mourning Dove Road Extension)


Page 8 of 9

150

SCHEDULE 'C'

FINANCIAL PAYMENTS

Forthwith upon execution of this Agreement, the Owners agree lo pay to the Town:

1. Agreement Preparation

An amount of $6,462 00 as a contribution towards preparation of the agreement and processing of this Agreement by the Town, which amount does not include the costs of registration of the documents, plus an additional15% administrative fee

2. 5.4% Engineering Fees

Prior to the execution of this Agreement, the Owner agrees that they shall pay an amount of 5,4% of the value of all external works and services to be constructed by the Owner, as estimated by the Owne~s consultant in the Cost Estimate and confirmed by the Director towards the engineering and legal fees.

SECURITIES:

Prior to the execution of this Agreement by the Town, the Owner shall provide to the Town, in form and content satisfactory to the Town's solicitor, an irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of S36, 075.00 from a Canadian Chartered Bank, in an amount as determined by the Director for the road works.

Development Agreement (Re: Mourning Dove Rosd Extension)


Page 9 of 9

151


IN THE


BY-LAW NUMBER 2018- ( )

BEING A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THOMAS AND PERNILLE BOJIN, AS OWNER'S, AND THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA RESPECTING THE ROAD EXTENSION OF MOURNING DOVE ROAD FOR A LENGTH OF 22 METRES.

WHEREAS it is deemed appropriate to enter into a Development Agreement between Thomas and Pernille Bojin, as Owner's, and the Corporation of the Town of Georgina in connection with a road extension fronting Lot 259, Plan 427 and with a Site Alteration Permit application on Lot 259, Plan 427.

BE IT THEREFORE ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute a Development Agreement between Thomas and Pernille Bojin, as Owners, and The Corporation of the Town of Georgina respecting the road extension fronting Lot 259, Plan 427.

READ AND ENACTED this 4th day of April 2018.



152


REPORT NO. CS-2018-0009


APRIL 4, 2018

SUBJECT: REVISIONS TO THE USE OF CORPORATE RESOURCES FOR ELECTION PURPOSES POLICY

1. RECOMMENDATION:

1. That Council receive Report No. CS-2018-0009 prepared by the Clerk's Division, Corporate Services Department, dated April 4, 2018, respecting updates to the Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes policy.

2. That Council approve the updates to the policy titled "Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes".

2. PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to provide clarity with respect to the use of corporate resources for election purposes and obtain Council approval for the proposed revisions to the "Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes" policy.

3. BACKGROUND:

Following the 2014 Municipal Election, the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, S.O. 1996, c. 32, as amended (the Act) was reviewed and a number of changes made. The Municipal Elections Modernization Act, 2016 (Bill181) received Royal Assent on June 9, 2016. Section 88.18 of the amended Act states Ontario municipalities must establish " ... rules and procedures with respect to the use of municipal or board resources, as the case may be, during the election campaign period."

The Town's current Use of Corporate and Communication Resources for Election Purposes policy (Attachment 1) was adopted on March 29, 2010. Staff recommend the current policy be updated with the revised Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes policy (Attachment 2).

4. ANALYSIS_:

Based on the Town's commitment to a fair and transparent election process and changes to legislation, amendments are being proposed to the current policy. The

153

Page 2 of Report No. CS-2018-0009

purpose of the proposed policy is to establish guidelines on the appropriate use of corporate resources during an election period to protect the interests of both the Members of Council and the Town.

A. General Contributions

Section 88.15(1) of the Act states " ... money, goods and services given to and accepted by a person for his or her election campaign, or given to and accepted by another person who is acting under the person's direction, are contributions." The Act, under Section 88.8(4), also prohibits the acceptance of a contribution from a person or entity who is not entitled to make a contribution. A municipality is unable to make a contribution to a candidate.

Any use of the Corporation's resources for a candidate's election campaign would be viewed as a contribution by the Town to the candidate, which is a violation of Section 88.8(4) of the Act.

B. Updates Due to Legislative and Technological Changes

The proposed updates to the current policy include third party advertisers, clarification of signage, staff participation, modern technology, use of To~n facilities and the change to the beginning of the nomination period.

1. Third Party Advertisers

A definition has been added to the proposed policy for third party advertisers. Only an individual, corporation or trade union may file a notice of registration to be a registered third party for the election. Candidates may not register as third party advertisers. Individuals, corporations and unions are also able to make contributions to third party advertisers. Third party advertisers need to register with any municipality where they want to advertise. Registration allows a third party advertiser to promote or oppose any candidate or take a position on a question on the ballot. Third party advertising must be done independently of candidates, who are not able to direct a third party advertiser. Expenses must be incurred utilizing broadcast, print, electronic, or other medium to be considered a third party advertisement.

2. Campaign Signage and Materials

Further clarity has been provided regarding allowable signage during a rental period at a Town owned facility. Campaign-related signs or any other election/campaign-related materials may only be displayed within the area designated in the rental agreement and all materials shall be removed when the rental period ends. No campaign-related material is permissible at an "All

154


Candidates" meeting. Specific requirements regarding election signs can be found in the Election Sign By-law.

3. Staff Participation in Election Campaign-Related Activities

It is important to ensure all candidates have equal access to resources during an election campaign. One of the main proposed revisions to the current policy revolves around expectations of staff regarding participation in election campaign-related activities.

The proposed revisions state that during an election campaign, staff shall not:

(i) use corporate resources to support or oppose a candidate or third party advertiser;

(ii) canvass or actively work in support of or opposition to a municipal candidate or party during regular working hours unless they are on a leave of absence without pay, lieu time, float day, or vacation leave and shall not identify as a Town employee if engaged in political activity in accordance with this policy;

(iii) canvass or work in support of or opposition to a candidate wearing any item identifying themselves as a Town employee;

(iv) work as an election official if related to a Member of Council or a candidate;

(v) use official authority or influence to interfere or affect the result of an election, nor use their official title identifying themselves as a Town employee while participating in permissible political activities.

4. Technological Changes

A number of the proposed updates to the policy are reflective of changes in technology. The proposed amendments to the policy acknowledge the increased use of technology in election campaigns, including increased use of websites, e-newsletters and social media sites, such as Facebook and Twitter.

During our two by-elections in 2017, there were a number of issues surrounding candidates using Town branding, such as the Town logo, on various election campaign-related websites, primarily on social media. Revisions have been proposed to the current policy in response to these issues. The Town logo, slogan, brand, etc. shall not be used on any election-related campaign materials or be included on a candidate's or election-related campaign website, including social media, unless it is a link to the Town's website to obtain information about the municipal election process. Photographs or images of Town facilities are not permitted for use on election-related campaign materials

155


or websites, including social media. Photographs produced for and owned by the Town shall not be used for election-related campaign purposes.

5. Use of Town Facilities

Town facilities may only be used by candidates or registered third party advertisers for campaign related purposes if the usual rental charges and permit procedures have been followed. No Town facility shall be rented for an election-related purpose during any day voting is taking place on the facility property.

6. Change to the Beginning of the Nomination Period

The change in the start of the nomination period from January to May does not affect the section in the policy regarding budgets for Members of Council. This section ensures 1112th of the budget is available after the election for the new or returning Members of Council. This is also in line with our Discretionary Spending Budget for Elected Officials policy.


This report addresses the following strategic goal:

GOAL 4: "Provide Exceptional Municipal Service" - ORGANIZATIONAL & OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE

This goal is achieved by ensuring the Town is committed to a fair and transparent election process.


There are no financial or budgetary impacts with the implementation of the updates to this policy.


There is no requirement that Council engage in public consultation or notice to revise policies.

8. CONCLUSION:

Staff recommend that Council approve the proposed updates to the Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes policy.

156


achel Dillaboug Deputy Town Cler

Approved~

David Red~\ Director of Corporate Services/ Deputy CAO

Recommended by:

John Espinosa, B.A., J.D. Town Clerk

Winanne Grant, B.A, AMCT, CEMC Chief Administrative Officer

Attachment 1 - Use of Corporate and Communication Resources for Election Purposes Policy

Attachment 2 - Revised Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes Policy

157

TOWN OF GEORGINA- CLERK'S DEPARTMENT POLICY No. DAS-CL-032

Subject: Authority, Ref. & Sec. USE OF CORPORATE AND COMMUNICATION RESOURCES FOR Council ELECTION PURPOSES

Policy Classification: Pages:

Clerk's Division 1 of4

Year

2010

Recommended/Approved by: Contact Position for lnf.

Council Town Clerk

1. Policy Statement:

Month Day

03 29

The purpose of this policy is to clarify that all election candidates, including Members of Council, are required to follow the provisions of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 and

1) No candidate shall use the facilities, equipment, supplies, services, staff or other resources of the Town (including Councillor newsletters and Councillor budgets) for any election campaign or campaign related activities.

2) No candidate shall undertake campaign-related activities on any municipal property during regular working hours other than under the circumstances outlined in Item No. 4 below.

3) No candidate, including Members of Council, shall use the services of persons during hours in which those persons receive any compensation from the municipality, and in the case of a Town employee unless they are on a leave of absence without pay, lieu time, float day or vacation leave, for any election campaign or campaign related activity.

4) Notwithstanding Clause 1 above, candidates, including Members of Council, may use municipally provided facilities for campaign related meetings subject to the usual rental charges and permit procedures for such use. "All Candidates" meetings may be held in a municipal facility; however, neither campaign-related signs nor any other election/campaignrelated materials will be displayed in any municipally provided facility.

This provision excludes the use of facilities in the Municipal Office Building at 26557 Civic Centre Road, which shall not be used by any candidates or Members of Council for any election-related purpose.

Report #CS-2018-0009 Attachment 1

Page 1 of 4

158

TOWN OF GEORGINA- CLERK'S DIVISION POLICY No. DAS-CL-032

Subject: Page: Use of Corporate and Communication Resources For Election Purposes

2. Application:

This policy is applicable to all candidates, including Members of Council.

Specific Policy:

1) That, in order to ensure compliance with Section 70(4) of the Municipal Elections Act 1996:

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Corporate resources, assets and funding may not be used for any election-related campaign purposes;

Staff may not canvass or actively work in support of a municipal candidate or party during normal working hours unless they are on a leave of absence without pay, lieu time, float day, or vacation leave;

Candidates, including Members of Council, may not display materials in municipally-provided facilities for any election-related campaign purposes, which includes displaying of any campaign related signs in the window or on the premises, as well as displaying any election-related material in the office;

The Budgets for Members of Council for the period January 1st to Election Day in a municipal election year be restricted to 11112ths of the approved annual budget amount with the provision that subsequent to election day:

i) New Members of Council be allocated a budget equal to 111 ih of the approved budget amount for the month of December; and

ii) Re-elected Members of Council have available to them the balance of funds remaining as of Election Day;

(e) The following be discontinued for Members of Council from the day prior to Nomination day in a municipal election year to Election Day:

(i) all forms of advertising, including in municipal publications;

(ii) all printing, high speed photocopying and distribution, including printing and general distribution of newsletters unless so directed and approved by Council;


Page 2 of4

159



(iii) the ordering of office furniture and furnishings, except those of an emergency nature, as well as no movement of furniture and furnishings; and

(iv) the ordering of stationery

(f) Members of Council may not deliver any unsolicited material outside their existing ward where the printing and/or distribution costs are paid by the municipality. Care should be taken to ensure that the mailing of newsletters be restricted to the member's ward only (with accommodation made for the normal spillage associated with Canada Post postal walks). This recommendation to be effective not only during an election year but at all times;

(g) Members of Council may not:

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

(iv)

print or distribute any material paid by municipal funds that illustrates that a Member of Council or any other individual is registered in any election or where they will· be running for office;

profile (name or photograph) or make reference to, in any material paid by municipal funds, any individual who is registered as a candidate in any election;

print or distribute any material using municipal funds that makes reference to, or contains the names or photographs, or identifies registered candidate, for municipal elections; and that Minutes of municipal Council and Committee meetings be exempt from this policy; and ·

enter into joint ventures using municipal funds outside their existing wards from September 1 01

h to Election Day, in the year of the municipal election, unless specifically approved by Council. At all other times a signed agreement between Ward Councillors is required;

(h) Members of Council are responsible to ensure that the content of any communications material, including printed material such as newsletters, advertising, etc. funded by the Town for the operation of each Councillor's Office, is not election-related;

(i) Web sites or domain names that are funded by the municipality may not include any election-related campaign material;


Page 3 of4

160



Members of Council may not use the municipality's voice mail system to record election related messages; and the computer network (including the Town 's e-mail system) may not be used to distribute election-related correspondence;

(k) cell phones and Personal Digital Assistants (PDA 's) that are funded by the Town may not be used for any election-related campaign purposes, unless the Town is reimbursed;

(I) The above rules also apply to an acclaimed Member or a Member not seeking re-election; and .

2) That the Municipal Clerk be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect to this policy.

Limitation:

Nothing in this Policy shall preclude a Member of Council from performing their job as a Councillor nor inhibit them from representing the interests of the constituents who elected them.

Implementation:

This policy shall become effective immediately upon approval by municipal Council.

Date Approved by Council:

Rationale and Legislative Authority:

It is necessary to establish guidelines on the appropriate use of corporate resources during an election period to protect the interests of both the Members of Council and the Corporation. The Municipal Elections Act, 1996 prohibits a municipality from making a contribution to a candidate. The Act also prohibits a candidate, or someone acting on the candidate's behalf, from accepting a contribution from a person who is not entitled to make a contribution.

As a contribution may take the form of money, goods or services, any use by a Member of Council of the Corporation's resources for his or her election campaign would be viewed as a contribution by the Town to the Member, which is a violation of the Act.

C:Policies/EiectionCorporateResources 2010/05/06


Page 4 of4

161

TOWN OF GEORGINA- CLERK'S DEPARTMENT POLICY No. DCS-CL-032

Subject: Authority, Ref. & Sec. USE OF CORPORATE AND COMMUNICATION RESOURCES FOR Council ELECTION PURPOSES

Policy Classification: Pages: Year Month Day

Clerk's Division 1 of7 2010 03 29

Recommended/Approved by: Contact Position for lnf.

Council Town Clerk

1. Policy Statement

The purpose of this policy is to clarify that all election candidates, including Members of Council, are required to follow the provisions of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, S.O. 1996, c. 32, as amended (the Act) and during the election campaign period:

1) No candidate or third party advertisers shall use the facilities, equipment, supplies, services, staff or other resources of the Town (including Councillor newsletters and Councillor budgets) for any election campaign or campaign-related activities, including Councillor newsletters, a-newsletters, Councillor budgets, Town of Georgina registered trademarks or Town of Georgina branding such as the logo.

No candidate shall undertake campaign related activities on any municipal property during regular •.vorking hours other than under the circumstances outlined in Item No. 4 belo'tv.

2) No candidate, including Members of Council, or third party advertisers shall use the services of persons during hours in which those persons receive any compensation from the municipality Town. and in the case of a A Town employee unless they are must be on a leave of absence without pay, lieu time, float day or vacation leave fef to participate in any election campaign or campaign-related activity.

3) No candidate shall undertake campaign-related activities on any municipal property during regular worl(ing hours other than under the following circumstances. outlined in Item No. 4 below. Notwithstanding Clause 1 above, candidates, including Members of Council, and third party advertisers may use municipally provided facilities for C?Impaign related meetings subject to the usual rental charges and permit procedures for such use. Campaign-related signs or any other election/campaign-related materials shall only be displayed within the area designated in the rental agreement and all materials shall be removed when the rental period ends. "All Candidates" meetings may be held in a municipal facility; however,

Report #CS-20 18-0009 Attachment 2

Page 1 of7

162

TOWN OF GEORGINA- CLERK'S DIVISION POLICY No. DCS-CL-032

Subject: Use of Corporate and CemmuniGation Resources For Election Purposes

Page:2

neither campaign-related signs nor any other election/campaign-related materials will be displayed in any municipally provided facility during an "All Candidates" meeting.

This provision excludes the use of facilities in the Municipal Office Building Town of Georgina Civic Centre at 26557 Civic Centre Road, which shall not be used by any candidates or Members of Council for any election-related purpose.

2. Definitions

Acclaimed: A candidate elected by acclamation pursuant to Section 37 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, S.O. 1996, c. 32, as amended.

Candidate: A person who has filed, and not withdrawn, a nomination for elected office in any level of government.

Campaign Materials: Materials, in any media, used to solicit votes for a candidate or question on the ballot in an election including but not limited to posters, signs, banners, pictures, buttons, stickers, clothing, literature, other election paraphernalia, radio or television, online including websites and/or social media.

Clerk: The Town Clerk for the Town of Georgina or his/her designate.

Corporate Resources: Anything a person would have access to by virtue of their employment with the Town of Georgina or elected Office.

Election: An election or by-election for any level of government.

Election-related: Anything that relates directly to an election.

Nomination Day: Nomination day for a regular election is the fourth Friday in July in the year of the election or as otherwise provided in the Act.

Staff: Full-time and part-time individuals hired by the Town of Georgina, including contract, temporary, student, secondment or co-operative placement.

Third Party Advertisers: Any person, who is not a registered candidate, corporation or trade union who is registered under Section 88.6 of the Act.


Page 2 of7

163


Subject: Use of Corporate aRd Camm~;miGatiaR Resources For Election Purposes

Page:3

Voting Day: Voting day in a regular election is the fourth Monday in October and in the case of a by-election, the 45th day after Nomination Day.

3. Direction

This policy is applicable to all candidates in an election, including Members of Council, an acclaimed Member and Members not seeking re-election.

4. Scope and Responsibilities

It is necessary to establish guidelines on the appropriate use of corporate resources during an election period to protect the interests of both the Members of Council and the Corporation Town. The Municipal Elections Act, 1996, S.O. 1996, c. 32, as amended prohibits a municipality from making a contribution to a candidate or third party advertiser. The Act also prohibits a candidate, or someone acting on the candidate's behalf, from accepting a contribution from a person who is not entitled to make a contribution.

As a contribution may take the form of money, goods or services, any use by a Member of Council , candidate or third party advertiser of the Corporation's resources for his or her election campaign would be viewed as a contribution by the Town to the Member, candidate or third party advertiser, which is a violation of the Act.

5. Details

5.1 Specific Policy

That, in order to ensure eompliance ·.vith Section 70(4) of the Mt:Jnioipal Eleotions Aot 1996 The Town of Georgina is committed to ensuring a fair and transparent election process. Elections must be fair and unbiased while making certain candidates and voters are treated in a fair and consistent manner. This policy ensures incumbent candidates do not experience a material advantage over other candidates through the use of corporate resources.

(a) Corporate resources, assets and funding may not be used for any election-related campaign purposes, including Town registered trademarks or Town branding, such as the Town logo.


Page 3 of7

164


Su~ect: _ Use of Corporate and CemmuniGatien Resources For Election Purposes

Page:4

(b) Town events shall not be used for any election-related campaign purposes.

(c) Staff shall not:

(i) use corporate resources to support or oppose a candidate or third party advertiser;

(ii) Staff may not canvass or actively work in support of or opposition to a municipal candidate or party during normal regular working hours unless they are on a leave of absence without pay, lieu time, float day, or vacation leave and shall not identify as a Town employee if engaged in political activity in accordance with this policy;

(iii) canvass or work in support of or opposition to a candidate wearing any item identifying themselves as a Town employee;

(iv) work as an election official if related to a Member of Council or a candidate;

(v) use official authority or influence to interfere or affect the result of an election, nor use their official title identifying themselves as a Town employee while participating in permissible political activities.

(d) Candidates, including Members of Council, may shall not display materials in municipally provided facilities for any election-related campaign purposes, which includes displaying of any campaign related signs in the window or on the premises, as well as displaying any election-related material in the office.

(e) The Town logo, slogan, brand, etc. shall not be used on any electionrelated campaign materials or be included on a candidate's or election-related campaign website, including social media, unless it is a link to the Town's website to obtain information about the municipal election process.

(f) Photographs or images of Town facilities are not permitted for use on election-related campaign materials or websites, including social media.


Page 4 of7

165


Subject: Page:5 Use of Corporate aAd CemmuAiGatieA Resources For Election Purposes

(g) Photographs produced for and owned by the Town shall not be used for election-related campaign purposes.

(h) Distribution lists prepared using corporate resources shall not be utilized for election purposes.

(i) No Town facility shall be rented for an election-related purpose during any day voting is taking place on the facility r;>roperty.

U) The Budgets for Members of Council for the period January 1st to Election Day in a municipal election year be restricted to 11112ths of the approved annual budget amount with the provision that subsequent to election day:

i) New Members of Council be allocated a budget equal to 1/12th of the approved budget amount for the month of December; and

ii) Re-elected Members of Council have available to them the balance of funds remaining as of Election Day.

(k) The following be discontinued for Members of Council from the day prior to Nomination day in a municipal election year to Election Day:

(i) all forms of advertising, including in municipal publications;

(ii) all printing, high speed photocopying and distribution, including printing and general distribution of newsletters unless so directed and approved by Council;

(iii) the ordering of office furniture and furnishings, except those of an emergency nature, as well as no movement of furniture and furnishings; and

(iv) the ordering of stationery.

(I) Members of Council may not deliver any unsolicited-material outside their existing ward where the printing and/or distribution costs are paid by the municipality. Care should be taken to ensure that the mailing of newsletters be restricted to the member's ward only (with accommodation made for the normal spillage associated with Canada Post postal walks). This recommendation is to be effective not only during an election year but at all times.


Page 5 of7

166


Subject: Page:6 Use of Corporate aAd CemmYAisatieA Resources For Election Purposes

(m) Members of Council may shall not:

(n)

(o)

(p)

(q)

(r)

(i) print or distribute any material paid by municipal funds that illustrates that a Member of Council or any other individual is registered in any election or where they will be running for office;

(ii) profile (name and/or photograph) or make reference to, in any material paid by municipal funds, any individual who is registered as a candidate in any election;

(iii) print or distribute any material using municipal funds that makes reference to, or contains the names or photographs, or identifies registered candidate, for municip~l elections; and that Minutes of municipal Council and Committee meetings be exempt from this policy; and

(iv) enter into joint ventures using munic~al funds outside their existing wards from September 10 Non:"~ination Day to Election Day, in the year of the municipal election, unless specifically approved by Council. At all other times a signed agreement between Ward Councillors is required.

Members of Council are responsible to ensure that the content of any communications material, including printed and electronic material such as newsletters, advertising, etc. funded by the Town for the operation of each Councillor's Office, is not election-related.

Web sites or domain names that are funded by the municipality may not include any election-related campaign material.

Members of Council may not use the municipality's voicemail system to record election related messages; and the computer network (including the Town's e-mail system) may not be used to distribute election-related correspondence.

Cell phones, tablets and laptops and Personal Digital Assistants (PDA's) that are funded by the Town may not be used for any election-related campaign purposes. unless the Tovm is reimbursed.

The above rules alse apply to an acclaimed Member or a Member not seeking re-election. aA6


Page 6 of7

167


Subject: Use of Corporate and CommuniGation Resources For Election Purposes

5.2 Authorization

Page:7

That the Municipal Town Clerk be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect to this policy.

5.3 Staff Prohibitions

Staff are required to abide by Town Human Resources Policies and Procedures, including Respectful Workplace and Code of Ethics Policies.

5.4 Limitation

Nothing in this Policy shall preclude a Member of Council from performing their job as a Councillor nor inhibit them from representing the interests of the constituents who elected them.

5.5 Implementation

History:

This policy shall become effective immediately upon approval by municipal Council.

Policy in effect 2010/05/06


Page 7 of7

168

Subject:

From: trish kosa~ Sent: February-09-18 2:59 PM To: Melissa Thorne Cc: Ryan Cronsberry

FW: Georgina by the Lake House Tour- June 9th, 2018- Temporary Parking Exemption Request

Subject: Georgina by the Lake House Tour- June 9th, 2018- Temporary Parking Exemption Request

Melissa, last year you helped guide a resolution thru the process to enable the Food Pantry fundraiser (Georgina by the Lake House Tour) to have a temporary parking exemption so we can tell our ticket holders that they could park near the homes on the Tour without worrying re parking signs. I am hoping you can help us again!

The House Tour happens on June 9th from 11 am until4 pm. (Though volunteers arrive at homes by 10:30). The process is the same each year ie we print a ticket with 8 homes described & addresses provided; ticketholders purchase the ticket and do self-guided Tours during the day. Each year I aspire to sell 300 tickets ... tho 270 tends to be the reality. Perhaps 2018 will be that year!

The addresses for the 8 homes on the Tour are listed below:

1 Main Street, Pefferlaw 234 Pefferlaw Road, Pefferlaw 68 Sibbald Crescent 30 Hedge Road, Sutton 73 Wood River Bend 36 Marie Street, JP 9 Lands End, JP 207 Lake Drive E, Orchard Beach

Additionally we will serve a light luncheon at The Link Hall b/t 11:30- 2:30 Hoping the parking there is sufficient!

We print the ticket in April and I hope to know by April 1 re resolution so we can tell our guests that they can park near the homes. Last year we added this text to the ticket and I would like to repeat it this year:

Parking: The Town of Georgina is one our our fantastic sponsors. One way they support the Tour is allowing you to safely ignore No Parking signs you may see near the homes on the Tour (between 11 am and 4 pm)- as long as you don't park near hydrants or block driveways.

Best wishes- Trish

Volunteer

1

169

Carolyn Lance

Subject: Attachments:

FW: light up building request/proclamation LTNNME HELLO DOC 2018.docx

-------- Original message --------From: kathy Somers <Kathleen [email protected]> Date: 2018-03-04 17:08 (GMT-05:00) To: *Community Events <[email protected]> Subject: light up building request/proclamation

October 7th. 2018 is our 6th International Trigeminal Neuralgia day. The 2018 Light up Teal illumination initiative is to bring light and awareness to the World Health Organization by asking them to please add Trigeminal Neuralgia to their "Health Topic List" of illnesses which will expand awareness, grant access to further resources, and create opportunities for funding research for Trigeminal Neuralgia and Facial Pain Disorders.

Canadian Trigeminal Neuralgia Assoc (CATNA) support group, supports TNNME in the lighting up of buildings, bridges, all over the world. We go out to dinner, wear teal/blue clothing, ribbons to celebrate on October 7th. Please help us bring awareness for those who suffer from Trigeminal Neuralgia. Perhaps you even know someone who has tn and they have not been diagnosed. 10 percent of MS patients will be diagnosed with TN.

TN patients are likely to be in so much pain they can't speak, work, or socialize with others. Please help bring awareness by announcing our 6th International day, wear teal/blue to support awareness for TN. PLEASE HELP LIGHT UP THE WORLD IN TEAL/BLUE FOR AWARENESS!! If you are not able to light up buildings for us, perhaps you could put us on your social media sites.

From Kathy Somers kathleen [email protected] Group Leader for Canada TNA (CaTNA) www.catna2.ca Toronto/Ontario area Chapter and Newmarket

"TOGETHER WE WILL END THE PAIN"

1

170

R Annual International Trigeminal Neuralgia Awareness Day on October 7th, 20181

We would be thankful for your authorization to "Light up Teal" (or Blue) on October 7th, 2018. If you're not the main

person to make this kind of authorization could you, please forward this request to the individual that provides this sort

of permissions? This year we would like to shine a little brighter teal with the Light Up Teal illumination initiative by

asking not only your structure to light up teal but if you can pay it forward and suggest another iconic building and public

spaces to join us. The 2018 Light up Teal illumination initiative is to bring light and awareness to the World Health

Organization by asking them to please add Trigeminal Neuralgia to their "Health Topic List" of illnesses which will expand

awareness, grant access to further resources, and create opportunities for funding research for Trigeminal Neuralgia and

Facial Pain Disorders. Our goal this year is to have over 200 World Landmarks, international bridges, buildings, and

structures to "Light up Teal" for October 7th, 2018. We're flexible with dates.

All approvals will be mentioned on TNnME websites, social network sites as well as continuous press announcements,

newspapers article, and/or blog posts We will make sure to send any coverage to help keep everyone posted and this

year we would like your help and letting us know your social media sites so we can give public thank you and mentions.

All mentions of approvals will be listed on 2018 "Light up Teal" on TNnME web-site.

Follow this link for TNnME Media Page Hashtags: #LightUpTeal #trigeminalneuralgia #FaciaiPainDisorders

#TNTeal #WHO #WHOHealthtopiclist #we_are_not_invisible See below for details and please let us know should

there be anything we could do to get your authorization and support.

Name of Organization: TNNME (Trigeminal Neuralgia and Me) and The Facial Pain Research Foundation (Non-Profit)

International Awareness: Education and Financing for Trigeminal Neuralgia and Facial Pains Disorders

Contact Person: Toni Saunders Email address: [email protected] Reason related to submitting the

illumination request: 6th International Trigeminal Neuralgia Awareness Day October 7th, 2018

Date of Special Lighting: Sunday Oct 07, 2018 (We're flexible with dates as we had approvals from last year October 1st

thru October 13th in 2017! First choice date: 10/7/2018 Second choice date: 10/6/2018 Third date choice:

10/8/2018

Colors Requested: Colors 1 =Teal Colors 2 = Blue Colors 3 = Light Blue, Colors Requested: Teal, RGB #0080 80 128, 128,

blue RGB #OOOOFF 0,0, 255

notes to Requestee and Editors:

WHAT IS TRIGEMINAL NEURALGIA? Definition Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a very painful disorder ofthe portion of the

fifth cranial nerve (trigeminal nerve) that supplies sensation to the face. It is characterized by recurrent electric shock

like (paroxysmal) pains in one or more branches ofthe trigeminal nerve (maxillary, mandibular, and/or ophthalmic

branches), each supplying a different portion of the face.

Severe facial pain can last from a second to 15 minutes or longer; some individuals may have up to 100 lightning-like

bursts of stabbing pain in a day. Although remissions are common, trigeminal neuralgia usually is a long-term condition .

It can be triggered by such stimuli as heat or cold, windy hitting the face, chewing, yawning, or talking. Because the

sudden, sharp pain causes the individual to wince, the condition is known as Tic Douloureux or painful twitch

171

Ministry of Municipal Affairs

Office of the Minister

777 Bay Street, 1711' Floor Toronto ON M5G 2E6 Tel.: 416 685·7000 Fax: 416 585·6470

MAR 0 6 2018

Dear Head of Council:

Minlstere des Affalres munlclpales

Bureau du mlnistre

777, rue B11y, 17" ~tage Toronto ON M5G 2E6 Tel. : 416 686-7000 Tt'll~c. : 416 685-6470

Ontario

18-76007

I am pleased to inform you that the Provincial government has approved reforms to municipal eligible investment authorities that will provide your municipality with access to broader investment options.

Legislative amendments to the Municipal Act, 2001 passed under the Modernizing Ontario's Municipal Legislation Act, 2017 have been proclaimed in force as of March 1, 2018. These amendments, together with changes to Ontario Regulation 438/97 (Eligible Investments and Related Financial Agreements), provide eligible municipalities with access to investing in any security in accordance with the prudent investor standard and other requirements set out in the regulation.

This new investment authority may help municipalities earn better risk adjusted rates of return which can be used to address local priorities, such as financing the repair and replacement of local infrastructure.

For municipalities that do not invest under this new standard, further regulatory changes provide broader investment authorities under the prescribed list of securities.

The amendments deliver on the commitments that our government made through the recent review of the Municipal Act, 2001 and the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and demonstrate our government's ongoing efforts to support the financial sustainability of all municipalities in Ontario.

If your municipal staff would like further information about these changes, please advise them to reach out to the appropriate Municipal Service Office of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs .

I wish your municipality success as you examine how best to take advantage of these new investment opportunities.

Sincerely,

/A/~~ Bill Mauro Minister

c: Municipal Treasurer

172

April 1, 2018

Town of Georgina

26557 Civic Centre Road

RR#2 Keswick, Ontario

L4P 3G1

Attention: Carolyn Lance- Administrative Assistant to the Town Clerk, Council Services Coordinator

Dear Carolyn,

Re: 163rd Sutton Fair & Horse Show- August 9, 10, 11, 12, 2018

The fair is fast approaching and this letter will serve as the Sutton Agricultural Society's official request for:

-a temporary road closure of Fairpark Lane between Hawkins Street and Snooks Road

-to operate an entertainment tent

-the Town of Georgina to declare our fair a community event/festival

The dates of the 163'd Sutton Fair are listed above.

We look forward to hearing from you in this regard.

Thank you for your time,

Claire Bunnik

Secretary

Sutton Agricultural Society

173

Carolyn Lance

To: Melissa Thorne Subject: RE: Spring Fling - May 2018 - Road Closure Request - Market Square

From: Greg Forrest Sent: March-14-18 3:46PM To: Melissa Thorne <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Spring Fling - May 2018 - Road Closure Request- Market Square

Hi Melissa

Date: Saturday, May 26 Time: Event from 8am-2pm. Closure needed from 7am to Spm Road: Market Square Crescent. Would need from high street (on both ends of Market Square) and Market Street closed off Site Contact Name: Rebecca Caston or Audree Forrest

Thank you Rebecca

1

174

Carolyn Lance

Subject: Attachments:

FW: Proclamation : Human Values Day 24 April 2018 2017.Message WFVFromThePrimeMinister.pdf; A TTOOOOl.htm; 2017.HumanValuesDayMessage FromThePrime Minister. pdf; A TT00002.htm; 2018WFVBriefHistory.pdf; ATT00003.htm; HumanValuesDayProclamation.pdf; A TT00004.htm; WFV _HumanValuesDay_Proclamations.pdf; A TTOOOOS.htm

From: Manish Rughani [mailto :[email protected]]

Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 12:29 PM To: Margaret Quirk <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Proclamation : Human Values Day 24 April 2018

Mayor, Town of Georgina

Re: Proclamation Human Values Day April. 24th 2018

Dear Mayor Margaret Quirk

On behalf of the Steering Committee and the large number of community volunteers at the Walk for Values, we like to express our deep gratitude to raise awareness to practice Human Values and to building the "Communities of Character". Canada is a great country and we are proud of its multiculturalism and the rich values we hold.

This is the 16th year that we again take an important step walking together at the Walk for Values 2018, not for "fund" raising but taking a pledge to transform self and the community by practicing values. The Walk for Values started in 2003 when street violence took place in Malvern area of Toronto. Your support for this Walk and the proclamation of"HUMAN VALUES DAY" on April 24, 2018 will bring greater awareness about human values that shape our lives and the future of our children. Please be rest assured, we will continue to work diligently to spread your message of living in harmony, caring for each other and our environment, in every city in Canada and around the world.

We have attached with this mail the following documents for your records:

• A write up about the Walk for Values and how it is spreading the Values and helping us to be better citizens of this great country

• Message from Prime Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau

• Proclamation and messages from the Province of Alberta, Province of British Columbia, Province of Manitoba and Province of Ontario

• Proclamation from Cities, Towns, Districts, Counties, Municipalities and Villages

• One page summary of 90 Human Values Day Proclamations received in 2017 from across Canada

We look forward to the Town of Georgina proclaiming April 24, 2018 as the "Human Values Day".

1

175

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• CELEBRATING 15 YEARS WALK FOR VALUES

HONOURING CANADA 150 YEARS

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

PROCLAMATIONS & MESSAGES

WORLD HUMAN VALUES DAY 24th April Every Year

Flag Hoisted at Parliament Hill, Ottawa on April 24, 2017

Sathya Sai International Organisation, Canada Sathya Sai School, Canada

CANADA 150 1111?-2017

176

PRIME MINISTER • PREMIER MINISTRE

May 28,2017

Dear Friends:

I am pleased to extend my warmest greetings to everyone taking part in the 2017 Walk for Values.

Walk for Values is a community-based initiative that helps raise awareness of five important values: love, peace, truth, non-violence and right conduct. Since the inaugural event 15 years ago, the walkathon has grown to become a global phenomenon; every year participants in major cities around the world take up the pledge to improve the lives of their fellow citizens.

This year, the Walk for Values team has collaborated with the Royal Canadian Legion to include a special ceremony, An Act of Remembrance, in tribute to every Canadian soldier who answered the call to serve. I would like to commend the organizers and the students of Sathya Sai School for inspiring the community through this worthy initiative.

Please accept my best wishes for a wonderful day, and for every success in achieving your goals.

Sincerely,

" •

The Rt. Hon. Justin P.J. Trudeau, P.C., M.P. Prime Minister of Canada

177

PRIME MINISTER· PREMIER MINISTRE

Human Values Day

It is with great pleasure that I welcome you to Human Values Day, hosted by the

Organizing Committee of the Walk for Values.

This year marks Canada's 1501h year of Confederation, a chance to look back over

the span of our history and celebrate that which makes our country special, including our common commitment to human tights and positive values.

As we gather today to celebrate Human Values Day, we reflect on the importance

of community and reaffirm our dedication to treating others with respect. Canada

is stronger when we work together and interact based on our humanitarian ideals.

Thank you to the organizers of this amazing event and to all of you who are in attendance to support this worthwhile cause. Please accept my warmest welcome and best wishes for a memorable Human Values Day.

Ottawa

2017

178

1+1

What is Walk for Values?

Walk for Values rt 'J()~ 5<n ffle, fflll ~ ad fflll ~l

Celebrating 16 Years of Walk For Values

www.walkforvalues.com

1+1

This is a walkathon which was started in the town of Malvern, ON., in 2003 by the Parent Council of the Sathya Sai

School of Canada, a private elementary school, registered with the Ontario Ministry of Education. The school's thrust is

Education in Human Values, where the staff, parents, students and volunteers all focus on integrating human values

into the regular curriculum.

In 2004, this Walk became a national event being conducted annually in the cities of Ottawa, Kingston, Toronto,

Saskatoon, Winnipeg, Edmonton, Calgary, and Coquitlam where representatives from Vancouver, Surrey, and

Abbotsford join together with the City's Teddy Bear Parade. In 2007, it continued at Dundas Square, in downtown

Toronto and in 2007, it also became international when it was done in Australia in 5 major cities on a national scale.

Today it has spread over 4 continents in 30 major cities across the world. This is the little Walk that grew from just over

3000 walkers in Malvern in 2003 to over 5000 participants in 2010 at Yonge-Dundas Square, the heart of downtown

Toronto, growing by the end of 2014 to an annual international event covering 28 major cities in 4 continents and

counting! Since 2013, this Walk is being conducted from the prestigious Nathan Phillips Square, at Toronto City Hall.

This Walk is aimed at raising awareness of the importance of practicing positive values at helping in the eradication of

violence, bullying, drugs, crime, disrespect and greed in our society. The uniqueness of the event is that it is not a

fundraiser. Rather, each participant resolves to make the community richer by pledging to practice a value of his or

her choice. In this way, it is a "walk of love" aimed at making our city, one citizen at a time, richer in our commitment

to human values as a first step towards raising our social conscience.

Mission Statement

"Walk for Values" is a walk designed to raise awareness of Human Values and to promote individual and collective

responsibility for the progress of humanity, one step at a time.

Vision Statement

A non-monetary, non-denominational event, this unique initiative, based on the five basic universal human values of

Truth, Right Conduct, Peace, Love and Non-violence, is part of a global drive to seed human consciousness with

timeless affirmations such as hope, kindness, patience and honesty, along with other positive values deemed integral

to the sustenance and survival of mankind.

It calls for an honest self-examination from all its participants who identify areas for personal growth and pledge to

practice associated values not only for self-transformation but also collectively for social, environmental and global

reformation.

The Objective of the "Walk for Values"

The objective of the "Walk for Values" is to give members of the community, participating organisations and students

a clearer understanding of the importance of a values-based life. Basic Human Values of truth, right conduct, peace,

love and non-violence have been on the decline in our communities and our nations. We can see this in the daily

reports in the newspapers, radio and TV news broadcasts. Guns, violence and drugs have infiltrated our streets, our

communities and our families. By doing nothing we contribute to the increase of this decline. As responsible citizens,

we simply must do something about it. This WALK is an opportunity to fulfil that responsibility in a positive way by

raising the awareness of human values in our community.

179

•V. for 'V, , ~~' ·~

I ••··· c:\ . ., . \ ' J ,.,. /

.. LO'VIJ .

1+1 Walk for Values

A W~ ~ me, HU~ ~ a«d HU~ ~! Celebrating 16 Years of Walk For Values

www. walkforvalues.com

1+1

The Values we walk for are Values to live by

TRUTH- honesty, integrity, optimism, excellence RIGHT CONDUCT- courtesy, gratitude, fairplay, perseverance, determination, responsibility, sacrifice, initiative, leadership, courage, duty, ethics PEACE - contentment, discipline, humility, patience, satisfaction, self-control, self-confidence, self-respect, understanding, modesty LOVE- caring, compassion, reverence, forgiveness, generosity, kindness, enthusiasm, tolerance, dedication, devotion, unity NON-VIOLENCE - gentleness, consideration, moderation, cooperation, brotherhood, equality, cultural respect, social justice

Current Locations, touching the 6 continents- North America, South America ,Europe, Australia, Asia and Africa. Ca_nada: Ottawa, Kingston, Toronto, Saskatoon, Winnipeg, Edmonton, Calgary Fort McMurray and Coquitlam.

Australia: Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide, Canberra, Perth and Brisbane. USA: New York, Austin, Houston, Dallas,

Raleigh, Seattle, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Chicago and Tampa. Mexico India: Chandigarh, Visakhapatnam New Delhi. ~ew

Zealand: Auckland. Malaysia: Kampala. Hong Kong: The city of Hong Kong. Africa: Cape Town and Johannesburg.

Europe: UK. South America: Suriname

• It's not a fund raiser, but an event to promote Human Values and Character Development.

• The only major public event that supports & promotes excellence in Character in communities

• Collection of non-perishable food items -with goal of 10 tons- on a National basis for the Food Banks across

Canada

• Conducting a National Blood Donation drive in partnership with CBS

• Collecting new and re-usable clothing to be distributed to the needy

• Donated 108 Children's' beds to charity through the agency of 'Furniture Bank'

• Colorful floats, music bands and participation by other local public schools

• Motivational keynote speakers from the various community organizations

• "Go Green" was the theme for 2009 and continues as an underlying goal of all events

• Promotion of family values with fun games and prizes for children

• Leaders from the three levels of Government and other community organisations lead the parade

• Ignite Partner of Pan Am Games

• Alliance Partner for Canada 150

• Received 90 Proclamation of Human Values Day Across Canada

Respectfully submitted,

Man ish Rughani (Advisor Team -Walk for Values)

Hosted by the Parent Council - Sathya Sai School, Sathya Sai International Organization, Canada 451 Ellesmere Rd., Toronto, ON., Canada M1R 4E5; T. 416-297-7970; F. 416-297-0945; www.sathyasalschool.ca

Values Without Borders!

180

2017- PROCLAMATIONS WALK FOR VALUES

is proud to celebrate " Human Values Day" as proclaimed by the Premiers, Mayors and Members of Council in the following Canadian Provinces and Municipalities

• 1\ll\ T (~NJI!NI.

WhltchurchStoutfvMle

VillageofHalnesJunctlon

181

Minister of Seniors Affairs

61h Floor 400 University Avenue Toronto ON M7A 2R9 Tel.: (416) 314-9710 Fax: (416) 325-4787

March 2018

Mlnlstre des Affelres des personnes Agees

6"lltage 400, avenue University Toronto ON M7A 2R9 Till. : (416) 314-9710 Tlllllc.: (416) 325-4787

Dear Mayor, Reeve and Members of Council:

w ~.;;,-

Ontario

I am pleased to invite you to submit a nomination for the 2018 Senior of the Year Award. This annual award was established in 1994 to give each municipality in Ontario the opportunity to honour one outstanding local senior; who, after the age of 65, has enriched the social, cultural, or civic life of his or her community. The award pays tribute to this accomplishment, while simultaneously showing how seniors are making a difference in the lives of those around them.

Click here to submit a nomination.

Deadline: April 30, 2018

A certificate will be provided by the Ontario government and include as signatories: Her Honour the Honourable Elizabeth Dowdeswell, Lieutenant Governor, myself, Minister of Seniors Affairs, and the local Head of Council.

The Government of Ontario is proud to work with municipalities on this initiative. Seniors have generously offered their time, knowledge and expertise to make this province a great place to live and it is important we recognize their valuable contributions.

If you have questions, please contact the Ontario Honours and Awards Secretariat:

Email: Phone: Toll-free: TTY:

[email protected] 416-314-7526 1-877-832-8622 416-327-2391

Thank you for your support.

182

Carolyn Lance

Subject: FW: New Greenbelt Funding Programs Announced

Dear Councillor Neeson --

We are pleased to announce the Friend of the Greenbelt Foundation's latest funding programs - the Prosperous Greenbelt and Resilient Greenbelt funding streams.

Municipalities are a key partner in achieving the goals of the Greenbelt and supportive policies in the Growth Plan. We welcome the opportunity to partner on innovative and transformative

projects that make the most of all the Greenbelt offers.

We also encourage you to share this announcement with your constituents. Many community organizations are already a large part of the Greenbelt's success.

Ontario's Greenbelt protects farmland, natural systems and an abundant supply of clean water in the Greater Golden Horseshoe. This region is home to 70% of Ontarians and expected to grow by

3.8 million people and an additional 1.5 million jobs by 2041. The continued prosperity and

livability of the region will be determined to a very significant degree by the success and strength

of the Greenbelt and supportive programs.

By investing in the opportunities provided by the Greenbelt, the Foundation is helping to ensure

Ontarians benefit from a working countryside that includes agriculture, one of the province's top economies, supports $9.1 billion in economic activity every year and enjoys a $3.2 billion "return

on environment" through ecosystem services.

Funding priorities for Prosperous Greenbelt build on the unique character of the Greenbelt's agricultural and natural landscape by investing in projects that generate economic activity to

support the agricultural economy, rural vitality including outdoor recreation and tourism, and

planning for climate resilient communities.

The Resilient Greenbelt funding stream works with nature to increase public benefits provided

by the Greenbelt's natural resources and river valleys such as flood protection, fresh water, clean

air, local food and the enjoyment of nature. Through a climate mitigation and adaptation lens,

the health of the Greenbelt and its river valleys are essential to improving resilience in the

region.

The Foundation is able to fund charities and not-for-profit organizations. To be considered for funding, your organizations must submit a Letter of Intent that outlines a case for support

1

183

including your project idea and budget. Letters are due no later than April 10, 2018 by 5:00pm EST.

Full details on the Foundation's Funding Program can be found at www.qreenbelt.ca/apolyinq for a grant and the 2018 Grant Guidelines. Applicants are asked to use the Foundation's grant porta l to submit materials . All organization must first register and complete and eligibility quiz before proceeding to submit a Letter of Intent.

We encourage all potential applicants to contact the Foundation to discuss your idea prior to submitting a Letter of Intent. The Foundation 's grant program staff can be reached [email protected] and 416-960-0001 ext. 310.

Sincerely,

-- Edward McDonnell, CEO

The Friends of the Greenbelt Foundation is a non-partisan, registered charity, separate from government.

This project has received from the Government of Ontario. Such support does not indicate

endorsement by the Government of Ontario of the contents of this material.

Friends of the Greenbelt Foundation · 661 Yonge St, Suite 500, Toronto, ON M4Y 1Z9, Canada

This email was sent to [email protected]. To stop receiving emails, cl'c ere.

Created by cStreet Campaigns & Friends of the Greenbelt Foundation with NationBuilder.

2

184

~ Ontario

Percy Hatfield MPP \Vindsor-Tccumsch

March 26, 2018

Hon Bill Mauro, Minister of Municipal Affairs Hon Chris Ballard, Minister of the Environment and Climate Change Hon Peter Z. Milczyn, Minister of Housing Hon Nathalie DesRosiers, Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry

Good day, Ministers.

I am writing in an attempt to have you interject in a planning issue in North Gwillimbury. There's a piece of property there known as the Maple Lake Estates. Part of it contains the Paradise Beach-Island Grove provincially significant wetland.

Georgina Council unanimously passed a motion calling on the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority not to allow an application from the DG Group that would destroy the wetland. However, the board at the Conservation Authority accepted a staff report, approving the project- because the developers had promised to hand over lands in the Greenbelt Protected Countryside that are already protected from development.

Once again, we see the interests of a developer being given more priority by a Conservation Authority than the interests of local residents or the very environment CA's are supposed to be protecting.

The wetland is to be sacrificed for a giant subdivision.

Provincially Significant Wetlands are among the most robust and diverse habitats on our planet. Our fens, bogs, marshes and swamps are integral to our natural habitat. Allowing parts of them to be destroyed for development is short-sighted, and in no way follows our strategy to encourage more sustainable wetlands .

Queen's Park office Room 363, Main Legislative Building, ~een's Park, Toronto, ON, M? A lAS lei 416-325-6773 I"' 416-325-6795 I" m;1 il [email protected]

... /2

Community office 5452 Tecumseh Rd. E., Unit 1 Windsor, ON, NST lC? ll'l 519-251-5199 I ;1x 519-251-5299 L m.ul [email protected]

185

Page 2- Paradise Beach-Island Grove provincially Significant Wetland

There is nothing innovative about it- it certainly doesn't demonstrate good stewardship - and there is nothing here that demonstrates restoration.

I say "shame" on the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority.

Ministers, I call on you to do whatever you can to reverse this decision. Issue a zoning order or take any action you deem fit to stop this giant subdivision in its tracks.

Send a message that our precious environment of today will still be here for our children and grandchildren, and not sacrificed on the altar of poor planning.

Regards,

Percy Hatfield, MPP NDP Critic for Municipal Affairs and Housing

c.c. Georgina Town Council c. c. Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority c.c. North Gwillimbury Forest Alliance

186

TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

DATE:

Mayor Quirk Members of Council

MEMORANDUM


General Information Items

April 4, 2018

Please notify the Clerk's office if you wish to have any of these items placed on the agenda for discussion:

i) Minutes of the Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting held on February 21, 2018. ii) Lisa Gagnon, Chair, Board of Directors, DeafBiind Ontario Services, urging Council

to check out its recommendations on how everyone can support the United Nations Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities by including the rights of individuals who are deafblind.

:je

187

interoffice Development Services Department

•M•E•M•O--•@ Town of Georgina

DATE:

TO:

CC:

FROM:

RE:

March 26, 2018

Carolyn Lance, Council Services Coordinator

Harold Lenters, Director, Development Services Dept. Velvet Ross, Manager of Planning Alan Drozd, Supervisor of Development Planning Dustin Robson, Junior Planner

Mamata Baykar, Secretary-Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment

Committee of Adjustment- March 26, 2018 Meeting -STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS

The following is provided for Council's information respecting Committee of Adjustment matters currently under consideration File Owner Location Status

A18-18 Minor Marq & Catharine 1 04 Elizabeth Street Agenda released; Staff support Variance Rusnell application.

Proposal The owners have submitted a minor variance application requesting relief from provisions of the Zoning By-law to permit construction of an addition to the east of the existing attached garage, having a minimum rear yard setback of 2.8 metres (whereas a minimum rear yard setback of 12.0 metres is required).

The property is zoned Residential (R) and is a corner lot located at the northeast corner of Elizabeth Street and Jaclyn Street.

Staff Recommendation: Staff support application for requested variances subject to the imposition of suggested conditions: (i) Submission to the Secretary-Treasurer of written confirmation from Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) indicating the owner has satisfied the condition outlined in their correspondence regarding obtaining LSRCA permit; and (2) That the above conditions be fulfilled within one (1) year of the date of the Notice of Decision.

File Owner Location Status

A19-18 Minor Maria & Jose De- 943 Lake Drive Agenda released; Staff support Variance Oliveira North, Island Grove application.

Proposal The owners have submitted a minor variance application requesting relief from provisions of the Zoning By-law to permit construction of a pool deck (with steps) around an existing above ground pool having a minimum exterior side yard setback of 5.3 metres from the existing exterior yard lot line (i.e. being 3.21 metres from the full extent of the planned street width for Charles Crescent); whereas a minimum

Mamata Baykar, Secretary-Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment, ext. 2267 Page 1 of3

188

File A20-18 Minor Variance

Proposal


Proposal

exterior side yard setback of 8.51 metres is required from the existing exterior side lot line (i.e. being 6.0 metres from the full extent of the planned street width for Charles Crescent).

The property is zoned Residential (R) and is a corner lot located at the southeast corner of Lake Drive North and Charles Crescent.

Staff Recommendation: Staff support application for requested variance; no conditions or terms imposed.

Owner Location Stacey And Shari 19 Robert Street, Miller Keswick

Status Agenda released; Staff support application .

The owners have submitted a minor variance application requesting relief from provisions of the Zoning By-law to permit construction of a detached garage (4.27 metres x 6.71 metres) in the front yard, having a minimum setback of 8.5 metres from the front lot line, (whereas an accessory building/structure is only permitted within an interior side yard and a rear yard).

The owners had previously, through Minor Variance application A35-16 obtained a minor variance approval (Notice of Decision dated January 24, 2017) to construct a two-storey detached garage in the front yard with an increased maximum height of 6.5 metres to the peak (measured from average finished grade). The owners have since changed their plans for the detached garage in the front yard. The owners through this minor variance application (A20-18), are now proposing a smaller onestorey detached garage in the front yard with a maximum height of 3.77 metres to the peak (measured from average finished grade).

The subject property is zoned Low Density Urban Residential (R 1) and is located on the east side of Robert Street and North of Lake Drive South, in Keswick.

Staff Recommendation: Staff support application for requested variances subject to the imposition of suggested terms: (i) that the detached garage shall not have any interior water fixtures and/or washroom facilities (i.e. sink, toilet, shower, or bathtub); (ii) that the detached garage shall not be utilized for sleeping accommodation/living quarters at any time; (iii) that the detached garage shall maintain minimum setback of 1.2 metres from the north interior side lot line; (iv) that the detached garage shall maintain a minimum setback of 8.5 metres from the front lot line; (v) that the detached garage shall maintain a minimum setback of 9.9 metres from the south interior side lot line; and, (vi) that the detached garage shall have a maximum height of 3. 77 metres.

Owner Mitchell Cecil Maries & Elizabeth Ann Maries

Location 24404 Park Road, Egypt

Status Agenda released; Staff support application .

The owners have submitted an application for minor variance requesting relief from


189

various provisions of the Zoning By-law to construct an accessory building (dry storage building) in the rear yard. Specifically, the following relief is requested: (1) To permit construction of a proposed accessory building having a minimum south interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres (whereas a minimum interior side yard setback of 3.0 metres is required); and, (2) to permit construction of a proposed accessory building having a minimum rear yard setback of 1.2 metres (whereas a minimum rear yard setback of 9.0 metres is required) .

The property is zoned Rural (RU) and is located on the west side of Park Road and north of Smith Boulevard.

Staff Recommendation: Staff support application for requested variances subject to the imposition of suggested terms: (i) that the accessory building shall not have any interior water fixtures and/or washroom facilities (i.e. sink, toilet, shower, or bathtub); (ii) that the accessory building shall not be utilized for sleeping accommodation/living quarters at any time; and, (iii) that the accessory building shall have a maximum height of 4.9 metres to the peak, measured from average finished grade.

Should Council wish to obtain further information, please contact Mamata Baykar, Secretary-Treasurer to the Committee of Adjustment.


190

interoffice Development Services Department

•M•E•M•O--•@ Town of Georgina

DATE:

TO:

CC:

FROM:

RE:

March 26, 2018

Carolyn Lance, Council Services Coordinator

Harold Lenters, Director, Development Services Dept. Velvet Ross, Manager of Planning Alan Drozd, Supervisor of Development Planning Dustin Robson, Junior Planner

Mamata Baykar, Secretary-Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment

Committee of Adjustment- March 12,2018 Meeting- COA DECISIONS

The following is provided for Council's information respecting Committee of Adjustment matters currently under consideration

File

A15-18 Minor Variance

Proposal

Owner

Joseph & Ashley Mclaughlin

Location

4698 Old Homestead Road,

Status

Approved as recommended.

The owners have submitted an application for minor variance requesting relief from various provisions of the Zoning By-law to construct a second storey addition to the existing single detached dwelling. Specifically, the following relief is requested: (1) to permit construction of a proposed second storey addition to the existing single detached dwelling having a minimum front yard setback of 13.19 metres (whereas a minimum front yard setback of20.0 metres is required, i.e. being 15.0 metres from the full extent of the planned street width for Old Homestead Road); and (2) to permit an existing porch (including steps) to be covered having a maximum encroachment of 2.71 metres into the required front yard, resulting in a setback of 10.48 metres to the front lot line (whereas a maximum encroachment of 2.0 metres into the required front yard is permitted). The subject property currently has a single detached dwelling on-site in addition to a barn.

The property is zoned Rural (RU) and is located on the north side of Old Homestead Road and east of McCowan Road.

Staff Recommendation: Staff support application for requested variances subject to the imposition of suggested conditions: (i) Submission to the Secretary-Treasurer of written confirmation from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) that the owner has satisfied their requirements pertaining to obtaining LSRCA permit; and (ii) That all conditions be fulfilled within one (1) year of the date of the Notice of Decision.


191


Proposal


Proposal

Owner Andrew Dixon.

Location 279 Parkway Avenue, Keswick

Status Approved as recommended.

The owner has submitted an application for minor variance requesting relief from various provisions of the Zoning By-law to demolish the existing detached garage and construct a new detached garage in its place. Specifically, the following relief is requested: (1) To permit construction of a proposed detached garage having a maximum lot coverage of 13.0% (whereas a maximum lot coverage of 10.0% is permitted for accessory buildings); and (2) To permit construction of an accessory building in the rear yard having a maximum height of 6.4 metres to the peak, measured from average finished grade, and a maximum height of 4.9 metres to the eaves, measured from average grade (whereas a maximum height of4.5 metres to the peak, and a maximum height of 3.0 metres to the eaves, measured from average grade, is required).

The property is zoned Low Density Urban Residential (R1) and is located on the south side of Parkway Avenue and east of Lake Drive South in Keswick.

Staff Recommendation: Staff support application for requested variances subject to the imposition of suggested terms: (i) that the detached garage shall not have any interior water fixtures and/or washroom facilities (i.e . sink, toilet, shower, or bathtub); (ii) that the detached garage shall not be utilized for sleeping accommodation/living quarters at any time; and, (iii) that the detached garage be constructed a minimum of 1.7 metres from the rear lot line and 1.7 metres from the west interior side lot line. Staff also requested imposition of conditions: (i) Submission to the Secretary-Treasurer of written confirmation from the Planning Division indicating that the owner has removed all existing accessory buildings onsite; and (ii) All conditions imposed are to be satisfied within 1-year of the date of the notice of decision.

Owner Nicola Lamanna

Location 9 Queen Street, Sutton

Status Approved as recommended; without any conditions. See below.

The owner has submitted an application for minor variance requesting relief from various provisions of the Zoning By-law to construct a replacement single detached dwelling and an accessory building. Specifically, the following relief is requested: (1) To permit construction of a proposed single detached dwelling and accessory building having a maximum lot coverage of 37.0% (whereas a maximum lot coverage of 30.0% is permitted); and (2) To permit construction of an accessory building in the rear yard having a maximum height of 5.5 metres to the peak, measured from average finished grade (whereas a maximum height of 4.5 metres to the peak, measured from average finished grade, is required).

The property is zoned Low Density Urban Residential (R1) and is located on the east side of Queen Street in Sutton.


192

File 89-18 & 81 0-18 Consents

Proposal

Staff Recommendation: Staff support application for requested variances subject to the imposition of suggested terms: (i) that the detached garage shall not have any interior water fixtures and/or washroom facilities (i.e. sink, toilet, shower, or bathtub); and, (ii) that the detached garage shall not be utilized for sleeping accommodation/living quarters at any time. Staff also requested imposition of conditions: (i) Submission to the Secretary-Treasurer of written confirmation from the Planning Division indicating that the owner has removed the existing detached garage, wood shed and tin shed on-site; and (ii) All conditions imposed are to be satisfied within 1-year of the date of the notice of decision .

COA Decision: As the applicant has already obtained Demolition Permit, the Committee approved the minor variance application without the recommended condition regarding removal of the existing accessory structures.

Owner Location Status Danielle & William 438 Pefferlaw Road Approved as recommended. Hutchinson (Also identified as 24

Memory Lane)

The owners have submitted two Consent applications (89-18 & 810-18) for the purpose of permanent easement over Memory Lane. Memory Lane is a privately owned right-of-way located on the subject property.

89-18: Through Consent application 89-18 the applicant is proposing to create a permanent easement over Memory Lane in favour of the property, municipally identified as 17 Memory Lane for legal access. 810-18: Through Consent application 810-18 the applicant is proposing to create a permanent easement over Memory Lane in favour of the property, municipally identified as 21 Memory Lane for legal access.

The property is zoned Rural (RU) and is located on the east side of Pefferlaw Road and north of Morning Glory Road.

Staff Recommendation: Staff support both applications for consent (easement) . There are no conditions or terms recommended.

Should Council wish to obtain further information, please contact Mamata 8aykar, Secretary-Treasurer to the Committee of Adjustment.


193



BY-LAW NUMBER 2018-0030 (PW0-2)

BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW NO. 94-60 (PW0-2) AND ASSUME CERTAIN ROADS AS PUBLIC HIGHWAY IN THE TOWN OF GEORGINA

WHEREAS the Council of the Town of Georgina deems it necessary to assume the following portion of road as a public highway:

ROAD REGISTERED LENGTH

NEEDS ROAD NAME PLAN FROM TO KM

STUDY Simcoe Landing Phase 7

Bardawill Thorn lodge Hickory -- Avenue 65M-4347 Drive Ridge Street

0.180

-- Bostock Drive 65M-4347 Hickory Lundigan

0.075 Ridge Street Drive

-- Grey Wing 65M-4347

Thorn lodge Hickory 0.180

Avenue Drive Ridge Street Hickory Ridge Paulgrave Bostock -- Street 65M-4347

Avenue Drive 0.219

Paulgrave 65M-4347 Thorn lodge Bache 0.145 --

Avenue Drive Avenue Bud Legget

Thorn lodge Bud Legget -- Crescent 65M-4368 Drive Cul-de-sac

0.230

Fred Mason 65M-4368 Joe Dales Paulgrave

0.220 --Drive Drive Avenue

194

BE IT THEREFORE ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA THAT Schedule 'A' to By-law 94-60 (PW0-2) is hereby further amended by deleting Pages 1, 2, 5, 6 and 11 of Schedule "A" and replacing same with Pages 1, 2, 5, 6 and 11 respectively, of Schedule 'A'.

~ READ AND ENACTED this 4th day of April 2018.



195

BY-LAW 94-60 SCHEDULE A

~-~AbbeY Rood

i"doioode -~Drive • ..., Drive

~Sir..t 'IMhCrescs>l llah C..SC.,I

...... ond« Boultvonl ,...,.end« Boulevard lk<IAvo,.,. ..... er;.., ~er;.., ,.,.,. er;.., ~-Orive ~~co --East ~~o-... Roedll'oiHI

Aifngl:on [)ivo Ashclolo Rood

~A"'"""' ...,dubon w.:y Becbo Allonue Be~ Rood aut.m Rood Bol!i>i~l

IJotdo<MI AlionJo ~A-Beyeo..t ~AvtiiiiO lay.liowAve,.,.

~-IMvwdoloC-1 -.!Rood

IBeclbd Rood ~!"Rood

Drive

FROM

Lake Drive N<>111 Grilfth ......... LakoDriveSoulh ~-ord F1allldinB410chflo<od PlrkwoodAvenue Lakovlow Boultvonl Motro Roed tiT8 VdgoAvSiue Motto Roed tiT8 Dollan Roed Foirwcocl Drive Ookcra Otivo Georg<llto Street IS!rilll Road Qau<h&reol Cllurch-_ .... .., ... 18

-.dllrivo

- Hora> er;.., Smilll 8o<Hverd Poulgravo Avonuo McCowan Roed IQyclermaq's Side Rood ~!Jrille lbcmlodgt Drive She~ All-• lllcllo Olive Tho au......... South 112 Tho 0uotmway Sc:U11 112 Motro Rood tiT8 Plnocro.tRoed Pa-k Road 118 Joen Street lfighway ll48 The Quemtwoy South 112

TO

Mllro Roed tiT8 West End Ea.t End Collide .llolenuo South &d Glo<-.lo Avenue Pana,.oodAv..,e VolaoAvenuo South End Cedor Grol• Rood Wo.tEnd £&lit End r:l Pion &sM-3332 S!>ring Roed Tho Q, ... swoy South 112 Nodi! End Nodh End NcxlltEnd RichmGld Park Drive Nodi! Qt..,el Drive Eul End South End JoeO...._DM ~·$Side Rood Hi!tlwaY f48 lloWdolo Orivo Hidcory Rldcle Sire« Woodl>no A-18 NodhEnd Lax. Driva South East End Tho Qlomswoy South 112 Plnec:res!Raod JoanSirMI West End lolirrwRood Bise&)TI!_ Boulovord

Page1

N~Sl\IDY SEC110ft NO

(2D08l

1332 ~

1010 1171 1400 10C8 1052 1405 1400' 1254 1454

11$7 10$0 1157 1184 11112 1588 1122 2112 252$

1522 1524

1302 1212 10112 1084 1134 3062 20SO l!ll31 2SSO 1088

ASSUMED ROADS X:IADMIN-'lPS\My Doclftlel'lts 2003\Byt-s\ASSUMED

L.EitGllt j!<M

O.ll!IC: 0.30CI 0.15C 0~

0.1 0.11 0.20 0.4 0.12C D.~

0.25Ci 0.95(! 0.42C 0.90(

0~ 0.10 0.10 0.58 0.1 0.1 1.10 0.20( 1.0()( 1.601 0,51 0.18( 0.551: 0.05( 0.50(

0.45< 0.15< 0.35< 0.25< 0.25< o.:io< 0.25(

196

BY-LAW!M-60 SCHEDULE A

~ADNAA'E

BolheiSid010 .. Bow.-, Drive "rc!I Knaii Road "rd!Roed

"rd!Roed -... ~ BculoYard

lad< Rlv• RcedfiD ~Riv-RoadfiO llue Haren Orive llue~-.-d Bom>ci<llrive -Ill! .. ~--Slreet l!owin11 G.., Roed

~-!Boo.wsRo.:i IBcYII'SRoed ~Rood l!redcon Oriw [Brenda Rood IBr.,.,«Court ~or Court [BroecMowA\IIIIllle· [Brocl!croscont

ocl!ht.lnliW-· uceAvenue

"'"~ lnlle 1..aiewlrt lnlle l.alc8w8y ludlecgt~

!'urb-rbSb'eot

OJ_rbSUeol llmabv Drive Ot_mieRoad mercncr-~Ccut ~oseOrlva

- Drive ::ai'IIIS!Te« ~Rood :ame.s Closee<'t

Car<>IAveroe

FIIOM

WanlonAY11111Je Mct.lilln Orfve Sibbold Reed VolgaAIIonue

IM!roRoedt'711 The Que..-ay S<Uh 112 Pet1c Road 118 2.8lcm WftA of~ BouloYilrd ~Pant Road t..cll Lana

Slralhcreon Lane [Hicl<ay Ridge Smol IM!roRoedt'711 Hil<ns!Road Mot:oRoadt'711 MecroRoadt'711 :1/arrwrf Roll.d 111/ardenAWriiM Tho OU....~S<Uh 112 touiso Slrftl Gltnd!Mer c,.._t e-n.. Ccut (CtJI..d6.sac) qcs HcmesUad R.-1 ~9 Faostry Drive Joe Dolo$ Orilla Ravenst>oe Road m MelroRoed t'711 V~A>Ienue

Uoke Drive East Thcmlodge Drive Higll SlrMI Garmt Drive H9tl_ $Intel Woxbd llriw

51>:\sol Beach -The Oueemwoy ScUh 112 Hocl!jnsAvw..,. Bisaiyl1o.~

T-Orille R.vonshoa ROild W32 ~A-ue Thcmtodgo Drive

MolroRoedt'711

Page2

TO

IIC.ennect1 Road .a The Qj-~ South 112 Soulll End Soolll End saUl! end WoodllineA-JII8 2.8cmEost Hoddon Rood NO!th End l.al<ashcre Road Uudii"!_Orfva Uudgon Clive Wast End Soulll End WeotEnd V.meyRo.:l WoodtinoA-18 WoodbinoA....,...I8

·~Drive

MlrioSIIMI To the weoteoly firni ol ~ 65M-3860 er-. Court (SSM-3860) Hc:hfi<kl Crasc:enl Fonlslty Drive Gran;onUr North End VOlga A_..., SoiA!! End Mllro Reed ~8 Budl-ag«Q-uan-...._.II"Lant WeotEnd North Steel Glltncn Plo.ot Ltnixaolc Drive The Q,..,~ Soulh 112 lioclgns ...,..,...

-Oriw HoiYwood Drive North End Rewmboo Rcedl32 Tl!arnlod!l- Drive Soolll End

NEEDS S lUOY SEC11011 NO

(200G)

1528 1024 2009 1414 1414 1090 ~

2060 2104

2082

1270 1238 I:ZSO 1262 1530 1532

1432 1594

1228 3068

1000 1410 1411 1420

4062 4064 4068 1466 2088 1112 1091 1099 1031 1002 1556

1336

ASSUMED ROADS X:\ADMIN.OPS\My DOCI.mS1ts 2003\Bylaws\ASSUMED

t..aKmf II<MI

2,00(

0.401: 0.20 0.17 0.53 UIO 2 0 . O.!l 0 0.1 om 0.65 OJ() 0.21:1 1.25

1~ 2.10(

0.521 OJOC 0.(13( 0.00 0.40C 0.65( 0.12! 0.50( 0.47 0.16( 0.15( 0.231 0.30( 0.301 0.101 ~_.l!Q( 0.20(

0.601 0.25( 0.40C

0-I!i( 2.()0( OA7 0.30(

197

BY-l..AWSN-60 SCHEDULE A

!RoAD~

(Ea__..Sir .. :ast Slreot ~sy_Sirall :dill> Street 3i:rabllhsn.ot 3izabolhsn.t ~Av.,ue

-All-• ~U..e

- Ur!o lmYiowGtr.-.s --.,sAvenue 0\t~Av-e 'aHaiDriw

l'airbank Avenue fajrct110tAVIIrnl& Fairpark Lane

Fairpark Lane FairM>od Drive Farley Circle Fanmoro"-ce Famcnlft Drive Famcrall Drive

rstAvenue Ao<ence Drive Fontaimo DriY• F<nslry Drive ~nBeachRoad ,. __ Ff1111 ....... 0riY. Frog Street

ogSiroot

IGoaloo All-• !Garden Avenue ~Ill Drive pea-go Road

G-oa Road IGecrgotte Stroot

FROM

Higl Slreel North Straot Riverside Drive

--~ Pork Read#! 8 Jac!yn SlrM! lake Orivo South lak811iew Boulevard BTIPOJanue .._.. Orivo Nor1h lake Drive North lake Driw Eost Pari< Rood ;J18

Metrol!oedm Catering Rood

Melto Roocl lr78

Grew BaJI"""'d St. Jarres Slreel Snooks Rood

.Arnt.vifN!I Drive lake Drive Eost 1/Vexford Drive Metro Road~ Highcaslle .Aol...,. Old HarMstee.d Road lr79

Poll.low Road f'21 camek Avenue Cld HarMstee.d Road tl19 LBke Drive East Metro Rood lr78

Joe Delos OriYe PorkRood;J19 Park Rood;J19

Cool<'s B8Y Drive Metro Road lr78 Burke Stroll Elizllbllh Straet

~-Water Drive

TO

North Street

Eo~ End RMnido Drive Sal.thEnd Jac:lynSlrell

West End

The a..-- South ;J12 The a,_,_~ IJ12

[SaY\"'wt Avenue Sal.th Unit

Motro RoodT/8 Molro Roodlr78

Mcunina Dcwe Road

Cedar Groole Rood West End

LakBDriveEII~

East End Sn-sRood St. James Street Bi~e l!aJiovard Molro Rood tl18 Eo~ IOidlumarumd

ti~Avonue

0.47 ""'-~ o(tf~slle ..., .... Melro Road lr78 North End West End

0.5km~

Melro Rood tRB Cedar Stn!et PouknvaAvenue West End Eost End

Metro Road lr78 I The a,_,swav South lf12

North End Corolyn Stroll Sal.th Urrit Pian39' LakeDriveSal.th

NEEDSSlUDY SECnoNNO

(2006)

4072

4074 2144 1412

2026 2026 1076 1049 1080 1244

1220 1314

2032 1252 1464

1376 4034 4092 4114

1374

1474 1237

1247

1232 3016 1183

n4 1398 1168

2514 2516

1138 1140

4066 2019

2019 1032

ASSUMED ROADS X:IADMN~PS\My Doc..nenls 2003\Byl-s.ASSUMED

LENC1H (KM:

0.101 0 .101 0 .451 0 .481 0.251 0.351 0.06(

0.201 0.25(

0. 16(

0.401 0.301 0.511(

0.511(

0.651

0.20 0.201 0.3111

1.17 1.11ll 0.16(

0.31 0.47 0.35(

0.2! 0.4(

o.sc 0.31! 0.2!

0.221

2.101 1.3 0.1

0.3 a. 0.5 0.04( 0.15(

198

BY~SCHEDULEA

~OADHAIE

GeagjnaSireel Glo-0-~Crascent

Gloncn Place Glonview Avenue Glenwoods Avenue GlenwooclsAv811Uo Glenwoocls Avenue

Glenwoods Avenue

Glenwoods Avenue Glenwoods Avanuo Glenwoods Avenue Golf Road

olf.liwr crescent Golf.liew Oescent Grwlgemujr Drive

131:-Boulellard Gr.. Boulevard GIWy Wn!l Jlllenuo GriflllhA""""" Gwondolyn Boultlvard

adden Road adera Place

Halbur1a1Drille UnarPalkRoed

-llriva Ha..-onv. Hastings Road

ldlie Court HaveDW<lOdTrail

awlcins Slreot awlcins Slreot -·-Ha-.sSinoot

-Avenue Hedrlo Road Hedgo Road "-Y Shot iici!Dry Ridge Slroot -tid~ Slreot i !#1<11511e Avenue i~Oescent

lcrestRood

FROM

Me--l..anandoleAvenue Richmond Pall< IJriva Bu-naby llrillo larch l..ano The Ouoensway Scuth ;1112 The Oueenswav South ;1112

0.2km East of Tho Oueensway Sallh ;1112

0.71on East oflhe OuoensWIIY South ;1112 Werden Avenue Kennedy Rood ~ McC<Man Road Metro Roedtll9 Wood River Bend Northwood Rood lhanlodgo Drive IJIIce Drive East MeadawlooAwnue lhanlodgo Drive PetrarlowRood.:!1 The Ouoonswav Scuth ;1112 Highway;ll48

Corrick Avenue Adelne Drive Peffor1awRood;ll21 Soolllllriw MetroRoodtll9 Peffor1awRood;ll21

Old Han-d Road tll9 L.aurandale AvMlue High Slreot 0.051an West ofHidl Street High Slreot Highstreot Faeslry Drive IJIIco Drive East MopleA-Tho OuoensWIIY South ;1112 Plui!PWN..,o Dalon Road Old -d R-tll9 9mocMaw N OMUO IJIIco Drivo North

TO

North End GIIIS!IDWOes<anl Prlnglon IJriva IO..mvileR-IL.o-areRoad l..oke Drive South 0.2km East

0.7km East oflho QJ8a1sway South ;1112 WooclineA...,..IIl

Wccdbino A-..18 !Warden Avenue I Ksnnecti Road 1!3 l..oke Drive North Northwood Road Wood River Bend I .Joe Dales llrM! 0.51an South Doton Road liclu>ry~-Adelaide Slreot Moira Road tll8 I!IKk Riv• Road 1110 North End lr.- llriva East End MolroRoodtll9 Sod~~ End South End North End Bache Nenue 0.05kmWest O.:!llun West Wast End WostaiNorlllSirHI Pinec:rBSIR-Moplo N...,O POJtc Roed;ll18 .Mnanorio on.. -Drive Wast End Femcroft Drive

Br-iew Awnue East End

NI!EDS SlUOY secTION NO

QD06I

4094

1592 1468

20n 1058 1500 1501

1502

1504 1506 1508 1246 4038 4040

4024 4026

3032 1148 2056 1173 1014 3006 1424 1428 3014

4058 4058 4060 4076 3068 2000 2002 1142

1456 1231 1230 1240

ASSUMED ROADS X:IADIIIN.OPS\My Docwnents 2003\Bylaws\ASSUMED

U!HG1H ~

0.251 0.78 0.7!JO 0.2$ 0.501 0.800 0.21]0 0 .501

0,951

2.1()( 1.951 2 .05! 0.2()( 0.15( 0.75( O.S3! 0.50(

0.41j 0.1 0.01

~ 0 0 0 . 0 .1 0 0 (l

0 .1 o. 0 .1 0 0 .1 0 2. 1 02 11.21 0 ,1()( 0..59(

0.55C 0.20(

199

BY -!.AW 94-60 SCHEDULE A

~-!'i_cla DriYe N!cla()M J'IO<IhClh..,olllriYo --Norlh-

~-l'lorvol Rood 0o1<e1est OrOie

l!ouloward 'Oelllono llci-Roodn&

-ac!Roodm -Roodm Shiloh Rood Shllah Rood Shioll Road

lid Shiloh Rood lid Shiloh Rood lldT"""""oRood

P.,goCaJrt Prd1.-d Bud1 Rood p.bcunesntt

Jlbc><noSirHI Olbtr c ..... Po..,..(;Qjrt l>orwho Drive ..,Rood

~-...,.....,.., ... MyA>iOOI""

rtwood Av-o 'asodana [lr;..,o lltricio Ploco _ ......... ~ ........... -....,. imeS.chllriw

nePostRoed --

FROM

L&eDriYoNa1h lllie1!oRoadn& Tho t:luoonsW1lY Soulh .,2 BoxlooSIIeot Riv.-Str.l GoNewC:ra..m Uko·Drtv• East Tho CluHnswavScUh•12 l~eBQ.oloo;ard

Uko Drive Eost MolroRoodn& Polo'$1.ano 0.11om- of_.....,. l'arkRoodiJI8 Pirie Rood IJI 8 121crn e:.s otl'lrlc Rood.,8

-· Sidotood.al ~-1-l!ghwlyNI Nlda Drive Uko Orivo Naill Scudill' Sllett ScudiorStreot Pin-ell Rood CWnrcse llriw Lake Olivo Eosl larch lono Metn>Roadn& Uko Drive Sculll 1\'1-/>N-o Uko Olivo Sculh Uko[lr;..,oSoulh W1tt1 Pirie Heigllls L..I,.,_/>Nrie Thanlodgo Drive

--~ The~ScUh.,2

ldelroRoadnB

.._,,

TO

McoRoodn8 EutEnd rNost End lildtt Stroot lillricol Stroot WestEild MolroRoodnB ...,,_,_[)riye Riwrs;lon~

So<J!'~Un'it

Ub~-0.11omw..t Wd.End Wool End !.21om EM Woi''o S .dotood .a1

Cedomm-\lidoria Slrootll82 1-t"~yl'lll

Na1h End MttroRoodll78 Soull1 End O...PiricRood Eotl End Soull1 &ld Soull1 End l.aloooboro Rood The au-- Salth 1n2 PI,_.. A>;enue

e:.st End --· Tho au_,-.y Salth 1n2 Eost End BacheAv..,... Bache ......... Old-odRoodm UJuo Dive Soull1 MttroRoodf78 ()ooll: DriYo

NEEDSS'NOY SECTION NO

I200e)

1208 1214 1118 4070 4088 4042 1312 1138 1103 1388 1222 3059 3GIO 2500 2502 2504 2508 2508 1588 1210 1234 1266 1288 3084 1101 1330 2070 1164 1064 1065 1054 1042 1018

3036 1068 1264 3060

ASSUMED ROADS X:IADMN.OPS\My Docwnents 2003\Byl-s\ASSUMED

LEJICnt (Kro'l

0;!5(

02>(

0~ OJIX 0 .10( O.:lO! 0.30( 0.37 O.AOC 0.1 0 0.1 0. I 1 5 1. 0 0 0 .05C 0.20( 0,30( 0 0 0 0.1 0. 0. o. 0.1 0 0. 0.1 0 .1 0,1 OA 0.6! 0.80 0.10

200



BY-LAW NUMBER 2018-0031 (CON-1)

BEING A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THOMAS AND PERNILLE BOJIN, AS OWNER'S, AND THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA RESPECTING THE ROAD EXTENSION OF MOURNING DOVE ROAD FOR A LENGTH OF 22 METRES

WHEREAS it is deemed appropriate to enter into a Development Agreement between Thomas and Pernille Bojin, as Owner's, and the Corporation of the Town of Georgina in connection with a road extension fronting Lot 259, Plan 427 and with a Site Alteration Permit application on Lot 259, Plan 427.

BE IT THEREFORE ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute a Development Agreement between Thomas and Pernille Bojin, as Owners, and The Corporation of the Town of Georgina respecting the road extension fronting Lot 259, Plan 427.

READ AND ENACTED this 41h day of April 2018.



201



BY-LAW NO. 2018-0032 (TR-1)

BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW NO. 2002-0046 (TR-1) - SCHEDULE Ill, TO REGULATE TRAFFIC AND CONTROL THE PARKING OF VEHICLES IN SIMCOE LANDING

WHEREAS the Town of Georgina wishes to amend Schedule Ill of By-law 2002-0046 (TR-1) which regulates the parking in Simcoe Landing, to add limits to No Parking for Joe Dales Drive, Paulgrave Avenue, Strathgreen Lane, Terrell Avenue and Thornlodge Drive and replace pages 1 and 2 of Schedule Ill.

NOW THEREFORE, enacted by the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Georgina that:

1) By-Law 2002-0046 (TR-1) as amended is hereby further amended by deleting therefrom Page 1 and Page 2 of Schedule Ill and replacing same with Page 1 and Page 2 of Schedule HI, with the additions of limits as follows:


ii) Paulgrave Avenue from Laurendale Avenue to Bache Avenue;

iii) Strathgreen Lane from Terrell Avenue to Bostock Drive; iv) Terrell Avenue from Strathgreen Lane to Laurendale

Drive; v) Thornlodge Drive from Ravenshoe Road to the northerly

limit of Carness Crescent.




202



BY-LAW NUMBER 500-2018-0011 (PL-5)

A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW NUMBER 500, BEING A BY-LAW TO REGULATE

THE USE OF LANDS AND THE CHARACTER, LOCATION AND USE OF BUILDINGS

AND STRUCTURES WITHIN THE TOWN OF GEORGINA.

Pursuant to Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, the Council of the Town of

Georgina ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. That Map 2, Schedule 'A' to Zoning By-law Number 500 as amended, is hereby

further amended by changing the zone symbol from 'C1-34' to 'C4-11' on lands

described as Part of Lot 7, Concession 3 (NG), being Parts 62 and 69, on Plan

65R-31761, shown in heavy outline and designated 'C4-11' on Schedule 'A'

attached hereto.

2. That Section 17.5 SPECIAL PROVISIONS of Zoning By-law Number 500 as

amended, is hereafter further amended by adding after Subsection 17.5.8., the

following:

"17.5.9 PART OF LOTS 7 CONCESSION 3 (NG) PARTS 62 & 69, PLAN 65R-31761

'C4-11' (Map 2)

Nothwithstanding Section 17.2, on lands shown in heavy outline and designated

'C4-11' on Schedule 'A' attached hereto, only the following non-residential uses

shall be permitted:

- bakery or bakeshop

-bank

- business or professional office

-catering establishment

- clinic, healthcare

Page 1 of 3

203

- clinic, veterinary (animal hospital), but not including outdoor canine runs or

animal containment areas

- laundromat

- parking lot, commercial

- garage, mechanical

- building supply and equipment establishment

- restaurant

- retail store

- service shop, personal or light

-school, private or commercial

-studio

- tourist information centre

- wholesale establishment within a building of which at least 25% is used for retail

sales

- accessory buildings, structures, and uses to any permitted use

The following provisions shall apply to those lands shown in heavy outline and designated

'C4-11' on Schedule 'A' attached hereto:

a) Notwithstanding Sections 2.55, 2.108, 2.168, 2.191, 5.28(b) and (i) and Section

13, the following provisions shall apply:

• Access to and from a parking area may be provided by means of an

unobstructed driveway connected to an access street or road pursuant to

Section 2.192. The maximum width of the driveway, shall be in accordance

with an approved site plan.

• The definition of a restaurant shall be as follows: "RESTAURANT: means

a building where food, beverages or refreshments are prepared and offered

for sale to the public for consumption, but shall not include a dance hall,

discoteque, dinner theatre, night club or entertainment lounge but shall

include an outdoor dining area/patio and take out drive thru feature."

• The minimum number of parking spaces for a restaurant shall be 5.5 spaces

per 95 square metres of gross floor area.

Page 2 of 3

204

• A mechanical garage shall be subject to the provisions established for the

'C4-11' zone and not Section 13.

b) Notwithstanding Section 2.82, 'floor area, non-residential' shall be defined to mean

"the total floor area of a non-residential building, including a basement, or cellar

area designed or used for non-residential purposes, but excluding any utility room,

washroom, janitorial closet, stairwell, hallway, permanent stock room, staff lunch

room, indoor loading area receiving vestibule, indoor garage storage vestibule, and

accessory office space", for the purpose of calculating parking requirements.

c) Notwithstanding any provision of this By-law to the contrary the maximum gross

floor area of restaurant uses shall not exceed 280 square metres

d) Notwithstanding Sections 17.4(c), (d) and (e), the following shall apply:

YARD ABUTTING WOODBINE AVENUE (MINIMUM)

YARD ABUTTING DOVEDALE DRIVE (MINIMUM)

ALL OTHER YARDS


Mayor

Town Clerk

5 metres

5 metres

3 metres

Page 3 of 3

205

PART LOT 7 CONCESSION 3 (NG) THIS IS SCHEDULE 'A' TO REGISTERED PLAN 65R-31761, PARTS 62, 69 AND 71 TOWN OF GEORGINA BY-LAW 500-2018- COl I (PL-5)

PASSED THIS ij't'h DAY OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK

FORMERLY TOWNSHIP OF NORTH GWILLIMBURY COUNTY OF YORK

Dovedale Drive

'C4-11'

Af&lL 2018

CLERK

MAYOR

CD :::J c ~

<( CD c ·-..0

"0 0

~

SCHEDULE 'A' TO BY- LAW , 500- 2018 -C{) /I (PL-5)

Metres 0 1 0 20 40 60 80

206



BY-LAW NO. 2018-0033 (COU-2)

BEING A BY-LAW TO CONFIRM THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON THE 41h DAY OF APRIL, 2018

WHEREAS under subsection 5(3) of the Municipal Act, S. 0. 2001, c. 25, as amended, the powers of a council of a municipal corporation shall be exercised by by-law;

AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient that the proceedings of the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Georgina at its meeting held on the 241h day of April, 2018 be confirmed and adopted by by-law.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the Town of Georgina, in the Regional Municipality of York, hereby enacts as follows:

1. The proceedings and actions of Council as contained in the Rep.orts and Additional Business referred to in Schedule 'A' at the end of this by-law are adopted and confirmed as if each proceeding and action were expressly adopted and confirmed by by-law. As if all such proceedings were expressly embodied in this by-law.

2. Subject to section 3, the Mayor, any other appropriate member of Council and the proper Town officials be authorized and directed to undertake all actions necessary to give effect to the proceedings and directions of Council referred to in section 1.

3. Where a proceeding or action requires an additional approval to that of Council before a particular action can be done in order to give full effect to it, the Mayor, any other appropriate member of Council and the proper Town officials before taking the particular action under the authorization of section 2, shall seek and obtain the necessary additional approval and are authorized to do so.

4. A document required to be signed on behalf of the Town shall be signed by the Mayor or Deputy Mayor, Town Clerk or Deputy Clerk.

207

-2-

5. A Member of Council, whose name is set out in Column 1 of Schedule 'B', Conflict of Interest, at the end of this by-law, has declared an interest with respect to any item in Column 2 set out opposite the member's name, and the Member has declared an interest in this confirmatory bylaw as it relates to the confirmation of the proceedings and actions on the item.

6. This by-law shall be signed by the Mayor and Clerk, affixed with the seal of the Corporation and engrossed in the By-law book.

READ and enacted this 4th day of April, 2018.



208

Schedule 'A' to By-law No. 2018-0033 (COU-2)

MINUTES

Council Meeting of April 4, 2018

209

Schedule 'B' to By-law No. 2018-0033 (COU-2)

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Column 1

n/a

Column 2

n/a

210

Documents

CORPORATION OF THE . TOWN OF GEORGINA . COUNCIL AGENDA . Wednesday, April 4, 2018 . 9:00 AM . 1. CALL TO ORDER - MOMENT OF MEDITATION “We would like to begin today’s meeti