12
Researchjournali’s Journal of Sociology Vol. 2 | No. 2 February | 2014 ISSN 2347-8241 1 www.researchjournali.com Benedicta O. Asante ZoomLion Ghana LTD, Research and Development Department Agyei-Baffour P Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, College of Health Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Kumasi, Ghana Cost Drivers Of Household Treatment Of Presumptive Malaria In Home-Based Management Of Malaria In Ejisu- Juaben Municipality

COST DRIVERS OF HOUSEHOLD TREATMENT OF PRESUMPTIVE MALARIA IN HOME-BASED MANAGEMENT OF MALARIA IN EJISU-JUABEN MUNICIPALITY

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This paper was prepared for Department of Community Health as a Master’s Degree Thesis by Benedicta Ofosuhemaa Asante.

Citation preview

  • Researchjournalis Journal of Sociology Vol. 2 | No. 2 February | 2014 ISSN 2347-8241

    1

    www.researchjournali.com

    Benedicta O. Asante

    ZoomLion Ghana LTD, Research and Development

    Department

    Agyei-Baffour P

    Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and

    Technology, College of Health Sciences, School of

    Medical Sciences, Kumasi, Ghana

    Cost Drivers Of

    Household Treatment

    Of Presumptive

    Malaria In Home-Based

    Management Of

    Malaria In Ejisu-

    Juaben Municipality

  • Researchjournalis Journal of Sociology Vol. 2 | No. 2 February | 2014 ISSN 2347-8241

    2

    www.researchjournali.com

    Abstract

    Home-Based Management of Malaria (HBMM) is one of the key strategies to reduce the burden of malaria

    for vulnerable populations in endemic countries. The strategy seeks to allow caregivers to have immediate

    health care from some selected and trained community members. The study sought to identify the cost drivers

    of presumptive malaria treatment and cost of seeking care from the community medicine distributors

    (CMDs). A cross-sectional study was done in the Ejisu-Juaben Municipality in the Ashanti Region. The study

    involved randomly selected 400 caregivers, (10) health staff and (90) community-based medicine distributors

    (CMDs). Structured questionnaires were employed to collect these data and data was analyzed into

    descriptive statistics with SPSS version 17 software. Test for associations were done at 95% confidence

    interval. With the assumption that transport cost and food cost were zero (0) in HBMM. The results reveals

    that, the cost of treatment of malaria for children between 6-11 months ranged from GHP0.01-1.00 ( 0.19

    STD), while children between the ages of 12-24 months ranged from GH1.00-1.50 (0.04 STD) and 36-59

    months ranged from GH2.00-3.00 (0.30 STD). Generally cost was described as affordable and drivers of

    treatment cost were level of severity of the illness, distance to the homes, time spent in travelling and in the

    consumers homes as well as the number of population within the CMDs catchment area. Cost incurred in

    accessing HBMM treatment was affordable to caregivers Drivers of treatment cost in HBMM varies from the

    caregivers and care seekers.

    Keyword: Malaria, Cost, Home-based management, Households, Treatment.

    1. Introduction

    Malaria, one of the world's most common and serious tropical diseases, cause at least one million deaths

    every year. Majority of which occur in the most resource-poor countries which also accommodate more than

    half of the world's population and are at risk of acquiring malaria. This proportion increases each year because

    of deteriorating health systems, growing drug and insecticide resistance, climate change, natural disasters and

    armed conflicts. Overall malaria accounts for 10% of Africas disease burden, and is estimated that malaria

    costs the continent more than $12 billion annually. The estimated cost to effectively control malaria in the 82

    countries with the highest burden is about $3.2 billion annually. In Ghana however, statistics show that one in

    five childhood deaths result from malaria. The cost of treatment of malaria alone is crippling the health

    budget in that in 2007 alone the cost of treating malaria amounted to about US $772 million and this equalled

    the entire health budget for 2008, and represents 10% of the countrys GDP for 2006.

    According to these researchers (Goodman et al., 2000; Akazili, 2002; Hanson et al., 2004) the economic

    burden of malaria was not high at the worldwide, but it was seen greatly in the various household and this was

  • Researchjournalis Journal of Sociology Vol. 2 | No. 2 February | 2014 ISSN 2347-8241

    3

    www.researchjournali.com

    the barrier to accessing health care as stated earlier. Lots of studies on malaria management are throwing

    more light on the importance of wealth position on malaria burden as well as access to treatment and

    prevention actions. In other studies, they value and measured economic cost basis on output or income losses

    incurred in the household rather than using a general indicator such as average wage rate. Loss of output and

    wages accounted for the highest proportion of the economic cost of the patients as well as the households.

    Relative to children, more young adults and middle-aged people had `malaria' which also caused greater

    economic loss in these age groups. Women tended to care for patients rather than substitute their labour to

    cover productive work lost due to illness. Comparing the methods used by other researchers for valuing

    economic cost, demonstrating the significant impact that methods of measurement and valuation could have

    on the estimation of economic cost, and justify the recommendation for methodological research in this area

    (Lipsey, 1994).

    Issues influencing cost of home-based management of malaria vary from one point to the other. Factors can

    either increase or decrease the size of cost. According to Collette (1994), level of severity of the illness,

    distant to the homes, kind of the interventions received (intensive or standard case management), time spent

    in travelling and in the consumers homes as well as the size of each of population each CMDs handles could

    affect the cost of HBMM. From the article of Joel (2006), there was an ideal that, the length of illness before

    getting a treatment was the key factor that determines either a high or low cost of treatment: In that, the longer

    the length of illness the higher the cost of treatment hence vice versa. In 1994, Lipsey studies also showed

    that, the cost of illness for outpatients who received early diagnosis and prompt treatment was four to seven

    times cheaper than the cost of illness for those who were hospitalized. Therefore, people from malaria

    endemic sectors should be educated in seeking early treatment from health facilities.

    According to some agencies, embedded in the cost involve in the various forms of activities within the

    HBMM were the factors which decrease or increase the cost of the programme. These activities included the

    administrative support, photo copies, stationery, telephone and supervision, meetings, training, as well as

    monitoring, and salaries for facilitators of CMDs. In addition is the cost of purchasing of bicycles, motor

    bikes, repairs and maintenance incurred on vehicles, motor bikes, and bicycles, boots, others are raincoats,

    torch lights and tool kits (made up of a box, cups and spoons, a torch light, napkins, stop watches, registers,

    treatment charts and blister packs of artesunate-amodiaquine, referral and tally cards) for distributors were

    also factors which pressurizes the cost of the programme. Again, at home, factors of late reporting of cases,

    adult wanting to take medicines when ill, mothers not completing medicines, and mothers refusing referral for

    lack of money as well as food and period of recovery, influence cost of home- based management. In

  • Researchjournalis Journal of Sociology Vol. 2 | No. 2 February | 2014 ISSN 2347-8241

    4

    www.researchjournali.com

    budgetary, policy and theory formulation as well as service-planning decisions, the above could serve as the

    basis.

    2. Methodology

    2.1 Study Sites And Population

    Ejisu-Juaben Municipality considered being one of the 26 political Municipalities of Ashanti Region. Its 2007

    population was estimated at 162,256, with a growth rate of 3.4%. The population aged below one year was

    4% and pre-school children for 20% of the population. Malaria was the leading cause of outpatient visits and

    accounts for 44.3% of OPD visits. Malaria was hyperendemic (Browne et al., 2000). It has 26 health facilities

    including 3 hospitals. It has 90 communities with 39 of them having functional village health committees.

    There were about 100 community-based medicine distributors (CMDs) who had been trained in home based

    management of malaria (HBMM) using pre-packed artesunate-amodiaquine (in the recent HBMM study),

    acute respiratory infections (ARI) and diarrhoea case management using ORS. The Municipality has doctor-

    patient ratio of 31344:1 and nurse-patient ratio of 4124:1.

    The current malaria interventions were case management, home management of malaria, distribution of

    insecticides treated nets (ITNs), and intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp). The Municipality

    capital, Ejisu was 20 km from Kumasi, the regional capital. It was a predominantly rural Municipality, with

    the main of occupation of the people being subsistence farming. A few farmers engaged in commercial

    farming, mainly cocoa and oil palm (Source: Population Reference Bureau/ Data Finder - Ghana, 2004). The

    study was done within a total population of about 162,256. The study population consisted of caregivers of

    children less than five years, health providers and CMDs. They were consented to be part after reading the

    informed consent and or the study protocols was interpreted to them in a language best understood by them

    and in the presence of a witness (es).

    2.2 Sampling Size

    A cross-sectional study was done in the Ejisu-Juaben Municipality in the Ashanti Region. The study involved

    randomly selected 400 caregivers, (10) health staff and (90) community-based medicine distributors (CMDs).

    The main outcome of the study was the proportion of the caregivers whose children presented with fever and

    were taken to the community health workers otherwise known as community medicine distributors (CMDs)

    for uncomplicated malaria treatment. Based on an unknown parameter, a prevalence figure of 60% was used

    to calculate the sample size. With a power of 95% confidence level, 5% significance level, the required error

    of 0.002025, design effect of 1, non-respondents of 10%, the sample size was 455 rounded up to 500. This

  • Researchjournalis Journal of Sociology Vol. 2 | No. 2 February | 2014 ISSN 2347-8241

    5

    www.researchjournali.com

    was estimated for the survey using the, n=Z2 p (1-p) d/e

    2, where Z= (1.96), p=proportion of event of interest,

    and e= required error, d=design effect.

    2.3 Data Collection Method

    Data on the cost of malaria and HBMM were collected as per objectives as follows: Information on

    identification of cost drivers were collected from caregivers and health providers including CMDs. These

    were done using structured questionnaires. For household cost, the cost of febrile episode receiving prompt

    treatment from CMDs, household cost of transport to and from source of care, household time costs of

    seeking care were collected. Structured questionnaires were employed to collect these data. Costing of

    HBMM was done in three main stages.

    Identification stage: This stage involved grouping household costs into cost of care; drugs, food, transport

    and time. However, cost of food and transport were valued at zero cost since caregivers never incurred such

    costs.

    Quantification stage: At this stage, monetary values were assigned to the various items using 2008 prevailing

    market prices to value.

    Valuation stage: The opportunity costs were estimated by multiplying the time spent in hours by wage rate

    per hour. This was done as follows: first all caregivers and CMDs were assumed to be labourers receiving a

    minimum wage rate of 1.92 for eight working hours as per the national minimum wage rate of Ghana. It

    means that the wage per hour was estimated as GHC 1.92/8 hours which amounted to GHC 0.24. This is

    consistent with similar method employed by Asenso-Okyere and Dzator (1997).

    Data pertaining to objective three (O3), assessing whether HBMM was sustainable; information was collected

    from caregivers and the project office. These were collected using questionnaires. To assess the ability of

    CDDs to prescribe medicines in HBMM was collected on participants. These were done using

    questionnaires, forms and interview guides. Information on objective five (5), estimating the opportunity costs

    of CDD and health providers in HBMM was collected using questionnaires, forms and interview guides.

    3. Data Handling And Analysis

    Structured questionnaires were employed to collect these data. The data was analysed using descriptive

    statistics, summarised and displayed in tables. Frequencies were further analysed using chi-square test to test

    for associations between some selected variables. For continuous variables, the estimates were for difference

  • Researchjournalis Journal of Sociology Vol. 2 | No. 2 February | 2014 ISSN 2347-8241

    6

    www.researchjournali.com

    in means with 95% confidence levels. Data was entered and analyzed into descriptive statistics with SPSS

    version 17 software.Test for associations were done at 95% confidence interval.

    3.1 Sensitivity Analysis

    Sensitivity analysis was an important feature of economic evaluations in which study results were sensitive to

    the values taken by key parameters. (Drummond et al, 2004) Sensitivity shows how the variation in the output

    of a mathematical model was apportioned, qualitatively or quantitatively, to different sources of variation in

    the input of a mode (Saltell et al, 2008). Sensitivity analysis was done using discount rates of 3% as a

    minimum and 5% for the upper ceiling with an estimated change in cost of +/-5%. This analysis indicated the

    possible change in cost as a result of change in discount rate. It thus measures the effects of economic

    conditions on cost of treatment for malaria.

    3.2 Results

    This study was done to identify the cost drivers influencing the cost of malaria as well as HBMM. Household

    cost as used here were both financial and opportunity cost one incurred whiles seeking treatment for malaria.

    The main component of the household cost of malaria were the source of treatment, cost of treatment,

    distance and time, days spent among the caregivers, health providers and CMDs. Table 1.1 presents detailed

    household cost incurred in seeking malaria treatment in the district.

    Table 1.1 Household cost

    Variables Indicators Health Consumers Community

    Medicine

    Distributors

    Source of treatment of malaria Home

    Chemical sellers

    CMDs

    100 (25%)

    152 (38.0)

    148 (37%)

    -

    -

    -

    Cost of treatment 0.1-1.00

    1.10-2.0

    2.10-3.0

    27 (6.8%)

    328 (82.0%)

    45 (11.2%)

    47 (100%)

    22 (5.5%)

    21 (5.25%)

    Average cost

    Standard deviation

    1.0788

    0.35140

    0.9111

    0.67299

    Consideration of cost Expensive

    Cheap

    Very cheap

    211 (52.8%)

    189 (47.2%)

    -

    33 (36.7%)

    43 (47.8%)

    14 (15.6%)

  • Researchjournalis Journal of Sociology Vol. 2 | No. 2 February | 2014 ISSN 2347-8241

    7

    www.researchjournali.com

    Bearer of cost of treatment Mother

    Father

    Other

    305 (76.2%)

    68 (17.0%)

    27 (6.8%)

    -

    -

    -

    Distance from the CMDs 0.5km

    1km

    213 (53.2%)

    187 (46.8%)

    -

    -

    Time spent with the CMDs 5

    10

    15

    30

    57 (14.2%)

    169 (42.2%)

    134 (33.5%)

    40 (10.0%)

    -

    -

    -

    -

    Level of satisfaction of treatment Very satisfied

    Not satisfied

    Not sure

    290 (72.5%)

    82 (20.5%)

    28 (7.0%)

    -

    -

    -

    Days spent with the CMDs 1day

    2days

    3days

    85 (21.2%)

    274 (68.5%)

    41 (10.2%)

    -

    -

    -

    Source: Authors Fieldwork, 2009

    Household cost of seeking treatment of malaria includes monetary cost incurred, distance, as well as time

    spent expressed in monetary cost. The household cost for seeking treatment ranges from 10Gp-30Gp per each

    episode of malaria. According to 82% of the health consumers, they pay between 20Gp and 30Gp for

    treatment of malaria of their children under five with a mean cost of 1.0788 and standard deviation of

    0.35140. Whiles the CMDs also indicate the cost of treatment to be between 10-30Gp with the average cost of

    0.9111 and its standard deviation of 0.67299. Again, 53.2% of the caregivers walk a distance of 0.5km, 42.2%

    spent 10 minutes and 68.5% spend a maximum of two (2) days with the CMDs. Also for uncomplicated and

    severe malaria, 70% and 41% of the CMDs spent 3-20 minutes and 28-39 minutes respectively with children

    under five years. However, the costs of the health providers charge for treatment for malaria in their various

    hospitals differ and hence expensive as compared to the home based management of malaria. About 40% of

    the health providers indicate the cost of treatment to be 6.00GH for uncomplicated malaria with an average

    cost of6.4000 and a standard deviation of 1.62959.Also, 40% of the health providers indicates the cost of

  • Researchjournalis Journal of Sociology Vol. 2 | No. 2 February | 2014 ISSN 2347-8241

    8

    www.researchjournali.com

    treatment to be 10.0GH for severe malaria with an average cost of 10.1000 and a standard deviation of

    1.663333.

    Table 1.2: Relationship between cost of treatment and occupational background of health consumers

    Occupation Cost of treatment of malaria for children

    0.5Gp 10Gp 20Gp p-value <

    Frequency (%) Frequency (%) Frequency (%)

    Famer 27 (6.75% ) 99 (24.7%) 0 (0%)

    0.0001

    Trader 0 (0%) 84 (21%) 45 (11.3%)

    Artisan 0 (0%) 119 (29.7%) 0 (0%)

    civil/public

    servant

    0 (0%) 26 (6.5%) 0 (0%)

    Total 27 328 45

    Source: Authors Fieldwork, 2009

    Table 1.2, presents the relationship between occupation of the caregivers and the amount paid for seeking

    fever treatment for their children. Twenty-seven of the farmers representing 7% paid 0.5 GP for treatment,

    and 99 (25%) paid GHC 1.00 for treatment. Twenty-one and eleven percent of the traders paid GHC 1.00 and

    GHC 2.00 respectively for treatment. Just about 30% of the artisans and 7% of the civil or public servants

    paid GHC 1.00. There were significant differences between the type of occupation and the cost paid for

    treatment, p-value

  • Researchjournalis Journal of Sociology Vol. 2 | No. 2 February | 2014 ISSN 2347-8241

    9

    www.researchjournali.com

    the cost Personnel(incentives)

    Distance

    Type of health facility

    Type of treatment

    Not sure

    -

    -

    100 (25%)

    258 (64.5%)

    42 (10.5%)

    2 (20.0%)

    -

    -

    -

    1 (10%)

    43 (47.8%)

    -

    -

    -

    -

    Factors that

    increase

    the cost

    Suppliers

    Personnel(incentives)

    Health facility

    Not sure

    -

    -

    -

    -

    3 (30%)

    2 (20%)

    3 (30%)

    2 (20%)

    30 (33.3%)

    60 (66.7%)

    -

    -

    Reasons for

    increase

    /decrease of cost

    Type of equipment

    and drugs availability

    Type and number

    of personnel

    -

    -

    6 (60%)

    2 (20%)

    90 (100%)

    -

    Trend of cost Increasing

    Decreasing

    -

    -

    8 (80%)

    2 (20%)

    -

    -

    Approaches to

    ensure least cost

    of treatment

    Find additional

    source of funds

    Outsource for staff

    Educate clients to

    seek early treatment

    -

    -

    -

    2 (20%)

    2 (20%)

    6 (60%)

    -

    -

    -

    Source: Authors Fieldwork, 2009

    Several factors influence the cost of home based management of malaria in the district. There were several

    factors either decreasing or increasing the effect of cost in home base management of malaria in the district.

    Suppliers, personnel, incentives, distance, type of health facility, type of treatment among others were the

    major factors influencing cost of diagnosing and treatment of malaria. For the health consumers, 64.5% of

    them indicate the type of health facility they sort treatment from as the cause of change in the cost of

    treatment of malaria. Again, 70% of the health providers indicate that the suppliers for the home based

    management of malaria influence the cost whiles 60% of CMDs indicates suppliers and the type of health

    facility affect the cost of HBMM. Also, 52.2% of the CMDs indicate suppliers as affecting the cost of

    treatment and 66.7% of them indicate incentives to the CMDs as another factor.

  • Researchjournalis Journal of Sociology Vol. 2 | No. 2 February | 2014 ISSN 2347-8241

    10

    www.researchjournali.com

    Table 1.4: Relationship between the gender and the cost drivers that decrease/increase HBMM

    Gender, n=90 P-value

    Increase cost of

    HBMM

    Male Females 1.000

    Supplies 14(15.6%) 16(17.8%)

    Incentives 28(31.1%) 32(35.6%)

    Decreases cost of

    HBMM

    Male Females 0.030

    Supplies 17(18.9%) 30(33.3%)

    Incentives 25(27.8%) 18(20.0%)

    Source: Authors Fieldwork, 2009

    There were no significant differences between the cost of HBMM and the cost drivers (supplies and

    incentives), P-value 1.000 at 95 confidence interval. Based on this, it could be concluded that, largely,

    incentives giving to the CMDs has no bearing on the cost of HBMM.There were significant difference

    between the cost of HBMM and the cost drivers (supplies and incentives). P-value 0.030 at 95 confidence

    interval. Based on this, it could be concluded that, decrease in supplies could reduce the cost of HBMM.

    4. Discussions

    From the cost of the HBMM and the health providers, it was seen that HBMM was less costly and affordable.

    A similar study done by Akazili, (2002) and WHO (2006), found that household cost of malaria treatment

    was estimated at 34% and 1% respectively of household income among the poor and the rich. This does not

    make the burden of malaria heavy on the household. However, a study done by Goodman et al., (2000);

    Akazili, (2002); Hanson et al., (2004) ) showed that, the economic burden of malaria was not high at the

    worldwide, but it was seen greatly in the various households and this was the barrier to accessing health care

    as stated earlier. Transportation cost is an important cost of seeking care, however in HBMM CMDs are

    located within a walking distance of 0.5 to 1km therefore, no transport cost is incurred. Proximity to source of

    care (CMDs) meant that time is saved in travelling. It follows that more time would be made available for

    economic activities. This confirms a study by Sauerborn et al, (1995) confirms that that reducing time spent in

    seeking treatment meant saving money since the time costs of seeking care was far lower than the value of

    time lost to care.

    According to Guest (1997), researches have uncovered a range of possible influences on rising costs.

    Supporting Guests studies, this study uncovered supplies and incentives giving to CMDs as the major factors

    influencing the cost of HBMM positively or negatively. Contrary to this study, the study of Collette (1994),

  • Researchjournalis Journal of Sociology Vol. 2 | No. 2 February | 2014 ISSN 2347-8241

    11

    www.researchjournali.com

    showed that the level of severity of the illness, distant to the homes, the kind of interventions received (either

    intensive or standard case management) time spent in travelling and the size of people each CMDs handles

    were the factors which either increase or decrease the cost of HBMM. Table 4.8.3 and 4.8.4 evidently

    indicates that suppliers involve in HBMM and incentives given to the CMDs actually influence the cost of

    HBMM. Thus the suppliers and monthly incentives could either decrease or increase the cost of HBMM. The

    hypothesis that, the cost drivers of integrated diagnostic and treatment package for HBMM does not increase

    or decreases the cost of treatment was rejected.

    5. Conclusion

    From the findings and discussions, cost incurred in accessing HBMM was less as compared to the one sought

    from the health facilities. All the caregivers could afford the price range of HBMM; GHC0.5 to GHC2.0.

    Supplies and incentives to CMDs were the two key factors influencing cost of HBMM. Other factors such as

    transport, distance and cost though expected as important, respondents did not mention them. Cost incurred in

    accessing HBMM treatment was affordable to caregivers Drivers of treatment cost in HBMM varies from the

    caregivers and care seekers.

    Authors Note

    This paper was prepared for Department of Community Health as a Masters Degree Thesis by Benedicta O. Asante.

    6. References

    Agyei-Baffour, P. (2008): Access, use and cost implications for equity of home management of malaria in children under

    five years in rural Ghana (PhD Thesis).

    Akazili, (2002): Costs to households of seeking malaria care in the Kassena-Nankana Municipality of Northern Ghana.

    In: Third MIM Pan-African Conference on Malaria Arusha, Tanzania, and 17-22 November 2002. Bethesda, MD,

    Multilateral Initiative on Malaria: Abstract 473.

    Asante and Asenso-Okyere (2003). Economic Burden of Malaria in Ghana, Institute of Social and Economic Research,

    University of Ghana, Technical Report submitted to the WHO- data Idriss, O (2007) Methodology for Calculating the

    Economic Cost of Malaria.

    Asenso-Okyere, W. K. and Dzator, J. A. (1997). Household cost of seeking malaria care. A Retrospective study of two

    Municipalitys in Ghana. Soc. Sci. Med. Vol. 45, No. 5,pp. 659-667.

    Ahmed K (1989) Malaria in Ghana-Overview. Ghana Med J, 22:190-196.

    Browne, E. N. L. (2003). Home management of malaria in rural Ghana using pre-packed Chloroquine (in preparation).

    Chima, R., Goodman, A. and Mills, A. (2003). The economic impact of malaria in Africa: A Critical review of the

    evidence, Health Policy, 63:1, 17-36.

  • Researchjournalis Journal of Sociology Vol. 2 | No. 2 February | 2014 ISSN 2347-8241

    12

    www.researchjournali.com

    Creese, A., Parker, D. Collette, A. (1994): Cost analysis in primary health care: a training manual for programme

    managers, WHO, Geneva.

    Drummond, M., Aguiar-Ibez, Nixon (2006): Economic evaluation. Evidence-Based Medicine and Healthcare,

    Singapore Med J; 47(6): 456.

    Hanson, K., Goodman, C., Line, J., Meek, S., Bradely, D., and Mills, A. (2004): The economics

    of malaria control interventions. Global Forum for Health Research, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Hopkins, H., Talisuna, A., Whitty, C. J.M. and Staedke, S. G. (2007): Impact of home-based management of malaria on

    health outcomes in Africa: a systematic review of the evidence. Mal. J. 6:134.

    Joel, E. S. (2006) RTI International RTI-UNC Centre of Excellence in Health Promotion Economics.

    McGuire, T., (2000): Physician agency. In: New house, J., Culyer, A. (Eds.), Handbook of Health Economics, Vol. 1.

    North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Ofosu, P. (2006): Pride of Ashanti, Dsezyn origin.

    RBM, (2001): Malaria: Progress in Rolling Back Malaria in the African Region, Lia. Bul. of Mal. Pro.WHO/AFRO, 4:4.

    Russell, S. (2004). The economic burden of illness for households in developing countries: A Review of studies focusing

    on malaria, tuberculosis and human Immunodeficiency Virus /Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Am. J. of Trop.

    Med. and Hyg. 7s Suppl. 2, pp. 147155.

    WHO, (2006): The Africa Malaria Report. Regional Offices for Africa and Eastern Mediterranean.