County Delivery Review School Survey ResultsReport to Steering CommitteeAugust 16, 2010Prepared by Judy AshleyExtension Coordinator for School Relations

MethodsTarget audience: school superintendents

and elementary school principalsOnline survey via Survey Monkey218 responded73 counties represented in results (46%)78 school systems represented (43%)Survey divided into:

◦ Introductory questions ◦Funding◦Value of programming areas◦Value of delivery methods◦Demographics

Introductory/Funding questions

Does UGA CE/4-H provide programming in any school in your school system?

Does your school system provide funding?

If yes, return on investment?Willingness to collaborate?Would you allow

paraprofessionals?

Value of Programming AreasHealthy Lifestyles and Nutrition

EducationPublic SpeakingCitizenship and Youth LeadershipScience Engineering and

TechnologyYouth in Agriculture

Ranking of Programming AreasCitizenship/Leadership (121)Science Engineering and

Technology (105)Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition

(99)Public Speaking (98)Youth in Agriculture (82)

Value of Delivery Methods

Camps and conferencesIn-school programming (club

meetings)Competitive eventsEnvironmental Education

Ranking of Delivery Methods

In-school programming (95)Competitive Events (83)Environmental Education and

Camps and Conferences (69 each)

Funding Strategies

Increase funding 20-30%Maintain current funding but

collaborateSupport property tax levyIncrease user fees to students

Demographics

Name of the school systemPositionSchool System enrollment

Summary87% received programming from

CE/4-H75% willing to collaborate59% disagreed with using

paraprosHighest ranked programming

area – Citizenship/LeadershipHighest ranked delivery method –

In-school programming

Thank you

Judy AshleyExtension Coordinator for School Relationsjashley@uga.edu