12
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 US Army Corps of Engineers San Francisco District Craig Conner Flood Risk Management Program Manager San Francisco District 9 December 2013 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® San Francisco District Meeting the Rising Bay Tide in San Mateo County Sea Level Rise Planning and Corps Programs

Craig Conner Flood Risk Management Program Manager San Francisco District 9 December 2013 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® San Francisco District

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Craig Conner Flood Risk Management Program Manager San Francisco District 9 December 2013 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® San Francisco District

Craig ConnerFlood Risk ManagementProgram Manager San Francisco District

9 December 2013

US Army Corps of Engineers

BUILDING STRONG®

San Francisco District

Meeting the Rising Bay Tidein San Mateo CountySea Level Rise Planningand Corps Programs

Page 2: Craig Conner Flood Risk Management Program Manager San Francisco District 9 December 2013 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® San Francisco District

BUILDING STRONG® 2

US Army Corps of EngineersSan Francisco District

How Much Does Sea Level Change Really Matter?

Corps of Engineers’ general approach:

► Become better informed using our science agency partners.

► Start changing our way of thinking at all project levels.

• existing projects and new projects

► Think in larger time and spatial scales.

► Consider cumulative system effects, connectivity, and extremes.

► Build collaborative relationships and prepare for adaptability.

► Screen large body of projects and address methodically

GOAL: Realistic acknowledgement of residual risk, and the potential for impacts on performance and costs

► Path to develop appropriate plans and approach to adaptation.

► Be aware and ready if large scale impacts are possible.

Page 3: Craig Conner Flood Risk Management Program Manager San Francisco District 9 December 2013 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® San Francisco District

BUILDING STRONG® 3

US Army Corps of EngineersSan Francisco District

EC 1165-2-212 - Incorporating Sea Level Change Considerations in Civil Works Programs

Three estimates of future SLC must be calculated for all Civil Works Projects within the extent of estimated tidal influence:

► Low – Extrapolated ► Intermediate-Modified

NRC I Curve ► High - Modified

NRC III Curve

Current guidance does notassign a probability to each curve.

► Scenario-based approach required

1.5m

0.5m

0.2m

The USACE sea-level change curve calculator (3 scenarios) can be reached at: http://corpsclimate.us/ccaceslcurves.cfm

Page 4: Craig Conner Flood Risk Management Program Manager San Francisco District 9 December 2013 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® San Francisco District

BUILDING STRONG® 4

US Army Corps of EngineersSan Francisco District

Comparison of Peer-Reviewed Research Estimates:GLOBAL Sea Level Rise by 2100

Page 5: Craig Conner Flood Risk Management Program Manager San Francisco District 9 December 2013 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® San Francisco District

BUILDING STRONG® 5

US Army Corps of EngineersSan Francisco District

Alternatives Development & SelectionScenario

1Scenario

2Scenario

3

Alt A ☺ -2 -20

Alt B -1 ☺ -5

Alt C -10 -6 ☺

Good scenario-based planning should consider:► Adaptive Management► Facilitating Future

Modifications► Designing for the Future

Example of Least Regrets Approach

Page 6: Craig Conner Flood Risk Management Program Manager San Francisco District 9 December 2013 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® San Francisco District

BUILDING STRONG® 6

US Army Corps of EngineersSan Francisco District

Possible Planning Approaches[One-Time {Precautionary} & Phased Investment {Managed Adaptive}]

Page 7: Craig Conner Flood Risk Management Program Manager San Francisco District 9 December 2013 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® San Francisco District

BUILDING STRONG® 7

US Army Corps of EngineersSan Francisco District

Phased Investment AnalysisResilient Levee Prism targeting Curve H vs. Curves 1 or 3

Result: Assuming the smallest plan considered is an RLP targeting Curve H, if in 25 years you can’t raise the levee 2.2’ for less than $10M, then you should build to Curve 3 now.

Page 8: Craig Conner Flood Risk Management Program Manager San Francisco District 9 December 2013 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® San Francisco District

BUILDING STRONG® 8

US Army Corps of EngineersSan Francisco District

How Can the Corps Help?

LARGE Projects (~$11M to ~$1B): General Investigation (GI)

Small Projects (~$2M to ~$10M): Continuing Authorities Program (CAP)

Technical Assistance (~$1K to ~$100K): Floodplain Management Services (FPMS) Planning Assistance to States (PAS) Interagency and International Services (IIS)

Page 9: Craig Conner Flood Risk Management Program Manager San Francisco District 9 December 2013 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® San Francisco District

BUILDING STRONG® 9

US Army Corps of EngineersSan Francisco District

General Investigations (GI)

GI advantage: no funding limits on project and more flexibility in modifying project

GI disadvantage: has a longer approval process than a CAP {Requires Congressional Approval}

Recon (100% Fed) Feasibility (50% - 50%) Construction (65% - 35% + LERRD, 50% max)

Must go through entire budget cycle (submit 2 FYs, then start Recon Construction)

Page 10: Craig Conner Flood Risk Management Program Manager San Francisco District 9 December 2013 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® San Francisco District

BUILDING STRONG® 10

US Army Corps of EngineersSan Francisco District

Continuing Authorities Program (CAP)

CAP advantage: Corps already has authority CAP disadvantage: limited funds and must meet

authority guidelines Provides authority to modify Corps project to

improve the quality of the environment $5M to $7M project limits ($25M to $50M

national limit) Cost-share (50%-50%) study, (65% to 75%-35%

to 25%+LERRD) construction

Page 11: Craig Conner Flood Risk Management Program Manager San Francisco District 9 December 2013 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® San Francisco District

BUILDING STRONG® 11

US Army Corps of EngineersSan Francisco District

San Mateo County Sea Level Rise Projects Challenges

How do we optimize Civil Works projects to be resilient to climate change with limited project resources?

Answer: Shared Responsibility between Federal, State, & Local agencies – need better collaboration and leveraging of programs, data, and funds.

Page 12: Craig Conner Flood Risk Management Program Manager San Francisco District 9 December 2013 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® San Francisco District

BUILDING STRONG® 12

US Army Corps of EngineersSan Francisco District

Contact Information

Craig Conner (415) 503-6903

[email protected]

http://nfrmp.us

Tom Kendall (415) 503-6822

[email protected]