15
Creating a Value Proposition With Creating a Value Proposition With Knowledge Management Knowledge Management Points for discussion Points for discussion Patrick Callioni Canberra 2 April 2002

Creating a Value Proposition With Knowledge Management Points for discussion Patrick Callioni Canberra 2 April 2002

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Creating a Value Proposition With Knowledge Management Points for discussion Patrick Callioni Canberra 2 April 2002

Creating a Value Proposition With Creating a Value Proposition With Knowledge ManagementKnowledge Management

Points for discussionPoints for discussion

Patrick Callioni

Canberra 2 April 2002

Page 2: Creating a Value Proposition With Knowledge Management Points for discussion Patrick Callioni Canberra 2 April 2002

Purpose of presentation

To discuss the significance of knowledge management to the future of Australia

To discuss measurement issues with knowledge management

To discuss how to create a value proposition for knowledge management

Page 3: Creating a Value Proposition With Knowledge Management Points for discussion Patrick Callioni Canberra 2 April 2002

The context

“The Newtonian God - ‘the God who made a clockwork universe, wound it, and withdrew’ - is dead.” Richard Hames Burying the 20th Century (1997).

““When a human society reaches the limits of its stability, it When a human society reaches the limits of its stability, it becomes supersensitive and is highly responsive to the becomes supersensitive and is highly responsive to the smallest fluctuation. Then the system responds even to smallest fluctuation. Then the system responds even to subtle changes in values, beliefs, worldviews and subtle changes in values, beliefs, worldviews and aspirations.”aspirations.” Ervin Laszlo Ervin Laszlo MacroshiftMacroshift (2001) (2001)

Page 4: Creating a Value Proposition With Knowledge Management Points for discussion Patrick Callioni Canberra 2 April 2002

The National Office for the Information Economy We must position the Australian economy as a

knowledge and service economy of the twenty-first century

Our international competitiveness is high and we rank highly in international benchmarking studies that measure countries against criteria related to information economy capacity

Our focus in tools that can help us do this, which are largely information management tools

Page 5: Creating a Value Proposition With Knowledge Management Points for discussion Patrick Callioni Canberra 2 April 2002

Measurement: Why it is important

““Each day, their organisations’ operations consume Each day, their organisations’ operations consume public resources. Each day these operations produce public resources. Each day these operations produce real consequences for society – intended or not. If the real consequences for society – intended or not. If the managers cannot account for the value of these efforts managers cannot account for the value of these efforts with both a story and demonstrated accomplishments, with both a story and demonstrated accomplishments, then the legitimacy of their enterprise is undermined then the legitimacy of their enterprise is undermined and, with that, their capacity to lead.” and, with that, their capacity to lead.”

MH Moore, Creating public value, Harvard University Press 1995, p. 57.

Page 6: Creating a Value Proposition With Knowledge Management Points for discussion Patrick Callioni Canberra 2 April 2002

Measuring knowledge and information

Information is an inert substance, with no inherent power of action, motion, or resistance; one must add something to make it useful and that something is belief (in the form of expectations), derived from experience (or knowledge = information + beliefknowledge = information + belief)

To create value in the information economy…we need knowledge and the capacity to manage that knowledge…to manage information and belief systems

Google shows over 3.2 million references for knowledge Google shows over 3.2 million references for knowledge management, more than for “risk management” (under 3 million)management, more than for “risk management” (under 3 million)

Page 7: Creating a Value Proposition With Knowledge Management Points for discussion Patrick Callioni Canberra 2 April 2002

Creating a value proposition with KM There are three sets of issues

First, measuring the cost of KM (and the cost of adding or subtracting to KM)

Second, measuring the value of KM to tangibles such as profit and loss statements

Third, measuring the value of KM to intangibles, such as service, satisfaction, perceptions, expectations, emotions, response time, quality, cycle-time, innovation and so on

Page 8: Creating a Value Proposition With Knowledge Management Points for discussion Patrick Callioni Canberra 2 April 2002

Creation of value

Value is a word that requires context to be understood

In most cases, the point of reference will be that of a shareholder or of a stakeholder

….but most of us occupy more that one vantage point and value to a shareholder may be ruination to an environmentalist…who may be the same person

Understanding beliefs and belief states is crucial

Page 9: Creating a Value Proposition With Knowledge Management Points for discussion Patrick Callioni Canberra 2 April 2002

A value creation modelOrganisation isaccountable for...

Measured how? By whom? Why? (Primaryreason)

Customer/client ... quality service Personalsatisfaction; returncustom

The customer Self interest

Shareholder/owner ... return oninvestment

Size of return oninvestment

The shareholder Self-interest

Regulator(s) ... meeting policyobjectives,delivering servicesaccording toprescribedminimum standards

Complaints, legalaction

The regulator(s), theMinister, theGovernment,Parliament,

To satisfy ownaccountabilities

Surrogates (lobbygroups et al)

... satisfying policyinterests

Satisfaction ofownclients/customers

Its clients/customers To satisfy ownaccountabilities

Community ... being a goodcorporate citizen

Amount of taxpaid, managementof the environment,how employees aretreated

The community,opinion leaders

Self interest

Partner (supplier) ... meeting agreed(mutual) obligations

Personalsatisfaction

The supplier Self interest

Page 10: Creating a Value Proposition With Knowledge Management Points for discussion Patrick Callioni Canberra 2 April 2002

Value creation model is fractal…..

The model can be used at the organisational level or…

...at any level below or above…

such as, for example, a division, team or individual…

...or a community, industry, region or state…

...and beyond.

Page 11: Creating a Value Proposition With Knowledge Management Points for discussion Patrick Callioni Canberra 2 April 2002

Creating a value proposition with KM (cont.)

The value proposition is the business case for action (and investment)

It is the logical link between action and return: If we do A, then B will happen, and the return on B will be higher than either the cost of A or the potential risk of not making B happen

We need to know who is measuring value to know what to measure and how

Page 12: Creating a Value Proposition With Knowledge Management Points for discussion Patrick Callioni Canberra 2 April 2002

Using the model

Whose point of view is important here? When you can answer that question, you can

use the model to understand what that “actor” values and.....why…

...and then... …how it might best be measured...

Page 13: Creating a Value Proposition With Knowledge Management Points for discussion Patrick Callioni Canberra 2 April 2002

Where to from here?

The major issues are issues of measurement

and, in particular, the management of intangibles

Page 14: Creating a Value Proposition With Knowledge Management Points for discussion Patrick Callioni Canberra 2 April 2002

The importance of intangibles

Tangibles explain less than 20% of the value of most publicly listed firms. Time Warner has only 6.49% of its value attributable to tangibles…for every $1 of true value, only $0.065 cents is being measured and managed by conventional management practices. For Oracle Corporation, tangibles account for only 4% of its value. For General Electric (worth over US$450 billion), tangibles account for less than 11% of its value (Standards Institute)