35
Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration Rachel Rhodes, Commissioning & Procurement Adviser, NAVCA Nathan Dick, Local Development Team Leader, Clinks

Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

  • Upload
    mirit

  • View
    27

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration. Rachel Rhodes, Commissioning & Procurement Adviser, NAVCA Nathan Dick, Local Development Team Leader, Clinks. Programme. The changing criminal justice commissioning landscape Why collaborate and how Understanding your market - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Criminal JusticeCommissioning and Collaboration

Rachel Rhodes, Commissioning & Procurement Adviser, NAVCANathan Dick, Local Development Team Leader, Clinks

Page 2: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Programme

The changing criminal justice commissioning landscape

Why collaborate and how

Understanding your market

Collaborating to deliver public services

Page 3: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

The Commissioning Cycle

Page 4: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

The changing criminal justice commissioning landscape

Page 5: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

What’s the direction?

NOMS commissioning intentions

Competitive tendering and outcomes

Payment by results

Aggregated contracts VS. Localism

Page 6: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Who are the main players?

Probation trusts Police and Crime Commissioners Joining up the local commissioners Joint/Co-commissioning The Voluntary and Community Sector The Prime Providers

Page 7: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Where does this leave your organisation?

• What are the main challenges – threats and opportunities that your organisation faces?

• Identify the strengths and weaknesses that your organisation has in adapting to these changes.

Activity

Page 8: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Collaboration and where you are now

Page 9: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Collaboration

• What is it?• Common drivers and motives• Levels of collaboration

a cooperative arrangement in which two or more organisations (which may or may not have any previous relationship) work jointly towards a common goal.

Page 10: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Collaboration

Why? What is the driver?• Geographically larger contracts• Reduction in specialist services• Fewer grants• Opportunity to improve/join up services• Expand reach or impact• Savings/efficiencies• Collaborate to influence

Page 11: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Exploring collaboration, simple steps….

Clarify purpose of collaboration

Evaluate shape of opportunities

Decide structure & nature of collaboration

Explore options

Understand your organisational needs & priorities

Page 12: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration
Page 13: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

On post-its:• A collaborative activity you currently undertake• The purpose of the collaboration

• Plot these on the collaboration spectrum.

Activity

Member of supported housing forum. Main purpose: influence commissioners

Subcontracted part of contract to work with males to another vol sector orgPurpose: to keep to our organisational aims

Page 14: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Changing strategic partnerships and decision makers

Considering the types of collaboration you currently undertake:

• Where do you have good links/representation?• Where is this lacking?• Are your collaborative working arrangements fit

for purpose?• Are they likely to be fit for purpose in the new

commissioning environment?

Page 15: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Understanding your market

Page 16: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Internal assessment

Page 17: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Market AppraisalWhat does your market look like?

Size Undeveloped / changing / growing / shrinking / sunset

Profitability not at all / low / high

Competition Highly competitive <----------> no competition

Type of competition Lots of small providers <-----> a few large providers

Customers Many <--------------> Few

Page 18: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Are opportunities..

• Changing• Plentiful or hard to come by• Profitable• Getting smaller – more personalised services• Getting bigger – joined up services• More competitive

Page 19: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Collaborating to deliver public services

Page 20: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Speculative

Responsive

Longer term collaboration, set up in advance with a wide membership and wide areas of activity

Shorter scale collaboration, set up in response to a particular opportunity with only relevant partners

What is a consortium:• Group of organisations who come together to win

contracts• Formal end of collaboration spectrum

Page 21: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

‘Before you Begin’

• What would you give, what would you get?

• Why would you consider forming/joining a consortium?

Activity

Page 22: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Managing ProviderContractor

Managing Provider Provision of Services

Sub-contractors Provision of Services

Page 23: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Managing AgentContractor

Managing Agent

Sub-contractors Provision of Services

Page 24: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Special Purpose Vehicle

•‘Super provider’ SPV•Social enterprise with own board•Constituted & incorporated•Prime contractor•Hub and spokes model

Page 25: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Super Provider( support unit)

Tender

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

Page 26: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

What benefits or risks are there with the 3 different consortia

models?

Page 27: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Stages of consortium development

Internal assessment

Exploration

Negotiation

planning

delivery

Review

Page 28: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

1. Internal assessment

Why do you exist?

Do you need to collaborate?

What does the future hold?

If so, what are you collaborating for?One or two areas of activity

Everything

What are you strengths / weaknesses

Page 29: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

2. Exploration

Who can add value to your mission?Do they exist?

Do you know each other?

Are they open to collaboration with you or others?

Do you share culture, values, delivery methods?

Page 30: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

3. Planning

Due diligence Leading to a formal agreement / partnership agreement covering:

Who does what – roles & responsibilities

Communications

Decision making & dispute resolution

Investment & resources

Costs

Branding

Location

Page 31: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

4. Delivery

Integrating different deliveryCreating a coherent service for service users

Monitoring

Management costs & overheads

Underperforming partners?

Page 32: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

5. Review

What is the success of collaboration

Outcomes

What next

Deeper integration or exit strategy?

Page 33: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Tendering collaboratively

Who will submit a PQQ?

Who will write the tender?

What evidence & policies do you need?

Will you/others hedge your bets?

Do you need sub-contract agreements?

What risk is the lead bidder willing to take?

Page 34: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

What next?

• Recap – main benefits, key risks

• What further support /resources do you require?

• Links to other resources

Page 35: Criminal Justice Commissioning and Collaboration

Nathan Dick

Local Development Team Leader, Clinks

[email protected]

Rachel Rhodes

Commissioning & Procurement Adviser, NAVCA

[email protected]

www.navca.org.uk/lcpu