Cuyamaca College 2016 Key Performance Indicators · Cuyamaca College 2016 Key Performance Indicators Office of Research, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness April 26, 2017 Grossmont-Cuyamaca

College Cuyamaca2016 Student Success

Key Performance Indicators

Office of Research, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness April 26, 2017

1 | P a g e

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction: 2016 Key Performance Indicators ............................................................................................................................ 3

Student Success Scorecard .............................................................................................................................................................. 3

Evaluation of Disproportionate Impact ............................................................................................................................................. 4

College Profile ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 10

All Students ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 10

First-Time Students .......................................................................................................................................................................... 15

Student Access & College Readiness ............................................................................................................................................... 22

Student Demographics and Service Area ................................................................................................................................... 22

Assessment Rates and College Readiness .................................................................................................................................. 24

English Assessments .................................................................................................................................................................... 24

Preparation Rates (Student Success Scorecard)....................................................................................................................... 54

Student Success Milestones ................................................................................................................................................................ 58

First Year Enrollment Patterns ..................................................................................................................................................... 58

Developmental Sequence Completion Patterns....................................................................................................................... 62

Developmental English Sequence, College Level Completion ......................................................................................... 62

Developmental English Sequence, Transfer Level Completion ....................................................................................... 66

Developmental Math Sequence, College Level Completion ............................................................................................ 70

Developmental Math Sequence, Transfer Level Completion ........................................................................................... 74

Remedial Progress Rates (Student Success Scorecard) .......................................................................................................... 78

Remedial English Progress Rates ............................................................................................................................................. 78

Remedial Math Progress Rates ................................................................................................................................................. 82

ESL Progress Rates ...................................................................................................................................................................... 86

Course Completion ......................................................................................................................................................................... 90

Course Success Rates: All Courses ........................................................................................................................................ 90

Course Success Rates: Transfer Level Courses .................................................................................................................. 94

Course Success Rates: Developmental Courses ................................................................................................................. 98

Course Success Rates: Career Technical Education (CTE) Courses .......................................................................... 102

Course Success Rates: Distance Education (DE) Courses ............................................................................................ 106

Retention Rates ............................................................................................................................................................................. 110

Course Retention Rates: All Courses ................................................................................................................................. 110

Course Retention Rates: Transfer Level Courses ........................................................................................................... 114

Course Retention Rates: Developmental Courses .......................................................................................................... 118

Cuyamaca College 2016 Key Performance Indicators Office of Research, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness April 26, 2017 Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District P:\Key Performance Indicators\KPI 2016\Reports\CC\Cuyamaca College 2016 Key Performance Indicators 20170426.docx

2 | P a g e

Course Retention Rates: Career Technical Education (CTE) Courses ..................................................................... 122

Course Retention Rates: Distance Education (DE) Courses ........................................................................................ 126

Persistence Rates (Fall to Spring) .............................................................................................................................................. 130

Persistence Rates (Fall to Spring): All Students ................................................................................................................ 130

Persistence Rates (Fall to Spring): First-Time Students .................................................................................................. 134

Persistence Rates (Fall to Fall) ................................................................................................................................................... 138

Persistence Rates (Fall to Fall): All Students ...................................................................................................................... 138

Persistence Rates (Fall to Fall): First-Time Students ....................................................................................................... 142

Persistence Rates (Student Success Scorecard) .................................................................................................................... 146

Units Attempted ............................................................................................................................................................................ 150

Units Attempted: All Students .............................................................................................................................................. 150

Units Attempted: First-Time Students ................................................................................................................................ 154

Units Completed ........................................................................................................................................................................... 158

Units Completed: All Students .............................................................................................................................................. 158

Units Completed: First-Time Students ............................................................................................................................... 163

24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year ............................................................................................................................... 167

30+ Units Completion Rate (Student Success Scorecard) ................................................................................................. 171

GPA ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 175

GPA: All Students ..................................................................................................................................................................... 175

GPA: First-Time Students ....................................................................................................................................................... 180

Student Success Outcomes ............................................................................................................................................................. 185

Completion Rates (Student Success Scorecard) ................................................................................................................... 185

CTE Completion Rates (Student Success Scorecard) ......................................................................................................... 195

Degrees and Certificates ............................................................................................................................................................. 199

Transfers .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 203

Transfer Rate (Student Success Scorecard) ....................................................................................................................... 203

Number of Transfers: CCCCO Methodology .................................................................................................................. 206

Number of Transfers: GCCCD Methodology .................................................................................................................. 206

Appendix .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 207

Data Definitions ............................................................................................................................................................................. 207

Student Characteristics: GCCCD Research Database ................................................................................................... 207

Student Characteristics: Student Success Scorecard ...................................................................................................... 207


3 | P a g e

INTRODUCTION: 2016 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Developed by the GCCCD Student Success Committee in 2013, the Student Success Framework provided guidance and structure to the student achievement metrics detailed in the Key Performance Indicators Report. As shown in Figure 1, the Framework is based on a student pathways model for student achievement. Measurement and data definitions were developed collaboratively in the Institutional Research and Planning Committee throughout 2013-2014.

This report is to provide the college community with useful information as it relates to students achievement and success as well as to incorporate accountability measures from the Student Success Scorecard. The data collected here is generated both by the California Community College Chancellor’s Office (via MIS reporting) and the GCCCD Research Database.

Lastly, this is an ongoing process and the future structure of this report will respond to the college’s need for data that is aligned with major initiatives associated with Strategic Planning, Enrollment Management, Program Reviews, and other major projects on the campus.

Figure 1: GCCCD Student Success Framework

Student Success Scorecard This report makes extensive use of the Student Success Scorecard. The Student Success Task Force (SSTF) recommended the implementation of a new accountability framework, whose purpose is to provide stakeholders with clear and concise information on key student progress and success metrics in order to improve performance. The recommendation specified that a scorecard be built on the existing reporting system, the Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC).

Financial AssistancePre-assessment PrepAssessment/Orientation/AdvisementLong Term Education PlanRegistration Before Term Begins

Start English/Math Sequence in First YearPersist in Developmental SequenceComplete Developmental Sequence within 2 Years Update Long Term Education Plan at End of First YearEnroll in Gatekeeper Courses

Start English/Math within First YearPass College Level English/Math Within One YearContinuously Enroll in First Three Primary TermsComplete 30 units of Degree Applicable WorkCompletion of GE Package within 6 YearsAchieve Transfer Preparedness within 6 Years

Degree CompletionCertificate CompletionTransfer OutcomeJob Placement (Focus on CTE)Licensure/Certification Pass Rates

ACCESS DEVELOPMENTAL COLLEGE-LEVEL COMPLETION

GCCCD Student Success Framework


4 | P a g e

In 2004, Assembly Bill 1417 triggered the creation of a performance measurement system for the California Community Colleges (CCC). That legislation and ensuing budget action authorized the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO) to design and implement a performance measurement system containing performance indicators for the system and its colleges. This comprehensive system is known as the Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges, or ARCC. To satisfy the request of the SSTF, the ARCC Advisory Workgroup, which guided the development of the initial accountability system in 2005, was reconvened. The workgroup was represented by individuals from various community college organizations and stakeholder groups, as well as researchers with technical expertise in performance measures. This technical workgroup reviewed the existing framework and designed the new Student Success Scorecard.

The data has now been disaggregated by gender, age, ethnicity, disability status, economically disadvantaged status, and veteran status in order for the colleges to monitor achievement gaps. In addition, outcome metrics are further broken down by whether or not first-time students enrolled at the colleges prepared for college level academics.

The Student Success Scorecard can be found at the following link: http://scorecard.cccco.edu/scorecard.aspx. The following report includes synopsis of the overall trends in the scorecard data.

EVALUATION OF DISPROPORTIONATE IMPACT

Using cohorts and outcomes from the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO) Student Success Scorecard and DataMart, this document presents two methodologies to measure disproportional impact for disaggregated subgroups within the California Community Colleges (CCC) student population: the 80% test and the proportionality test.

Disproportionate impact occurs when “the percentage of persons from a particular racial, ethnic, gender, age or disability group who are directed to a particular service or placement based on an assessment instrument, method, or procedure is significantly different from the representation of that group in the population of persons being assessed, and that discrepancy is not justified by empirical evidence demonstrating that the assessment instrument, method or procedure is a valid and reliable predictor of performance in the relevant educational setting.” [Title 5 Section 55502(d)]

The second-to-last column of all tables disaggregated by cohort student characteristics contains an evaluation of possible disproportionate impact for each subgroup of students using the “80% Rule” outlined in the 1978 Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures and was used in Title VII enforcement by the U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission, Department of Labor, and the Department of Justice.

The 80% Rule states that: “A selection rate for any race, sex, or ethnic group which is less than four-fifths (4/5) (or eighty percent) of the rate for the group with the highest rate will generally be regarded by the Federal enforcement agencies as evidence of adverse impact, while a greater than four-fifths rate will generally not be regarded by Federal enforcement agencies as evidence of adverse impact.” [Section 60-3, Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedure (1978); 43 FR 38295(August 25, 1978)]

Subgroups that do not comprise at least two percent of the cohort are denoted by with an asterisk (*). The bold percentage located at the bottom of the disproportionate impact column provides the outcome percentage of the reference group multiplied by 80 percent (the reference group is provided in parentheses).

The last column of all tables contains the results obtained from the proportionality methodology. The proportionality methodology compares the percentage of a disaggregated subgroup in an initial cohort to its own percentage in the resultant outcome group. The formula for proportionality is the percentage in the outcome group divided by the percentage in the original cohort (outcome percentage/cohort percentage). For example, 7.9 percent of the first-time, “degree/transfer-seeking” cohort is comprised of African American or black students; whereas 6.0 percent of the students who achieved a successful outcome (i.e., degree, certificate, transfer, or transfer-prepared) were African American or black students. Dividing 6.0% by 7.9% we find a proportionality index of 0.76. The higher the proportionality, the higher the rate at which a subgroup has attained a desired educational outcome; the lower the proportionality index, the lower the attainment rate.

The proportionality methodology does not specify at which point a proportionality index should be considered as a “disproportionate impact.” The designation of which disaggregated subgroups should be considered as disproportionately impacted will rely on the judgment of the analysis team at the college. Cuyamaca College 2016 Key Performance Indicators Office of Research, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness April 26, 2017 Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District P:\Key Performance Indicators\KPI 2016\Reports\CC\Cuyamaca College 2016 Key Performance Indicators 20170426.docx

http://scorecard.cccco.edu/scorecard.aspx

5 | P a g e

Proportionality Index Interpretation

1.0 Proportions of subgroups are equal.

Less Than 1.0 Subgroup is less prevalent in the outcome group.

More Than 1.0 Subgroup is more prevalent in the outcome group.

The tables below summarize the indicators of possible disproportionate impact by the different population groups of students across all measures investigated in this report. The summary categories are defined as:

Classification Description

Yes Disproportionate impact indicated by BOTH the 80% test and the proportionality test (< 0.90)

Yes1 Disproportionate impact indicated by the 80% test but NOT the proportionality test (>= 0.90)

Yes2 Disproportionate impact indicated by the proportionality test (< 0.90) but NOT the 80% test

No Disproportionate impact NOT indicated

N/A Sample size less than 30 students


6 | P a g e

Table 1: Summary of Disproportionate Impact by Race/Ethnicity

African

American

American

IndianAsian Filipino Hispanic

Pacific

IslanderWhite

Multi-

Racial

Student Access

ENGL-109/110 Placement Yes N/A Yes Yes No N/A No No

ENGL-120 Placement Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A No No

MATH-103/110 Placement Yes N/A No No No N/A No No

MATH-120 or above Placement Yes N/A No No Yes1 N/A Yes1 Yes1

Preparation Rate (SSS) Yes No No Yes Yes No No No

Student Success Milestones: Developmental

1st Year Enrollment Yes Yes No Yes No No No No

Developmental English Seq. (College) Yes N/A No No No N/A No No

Developmental English Seq. (Transfer) Yes N/A No No No N/A No No

Remedial English Progress (SSS) Yes Yes No No No No No No

Developmental Math Seq. (College) Yes N/A No N/A No N/A No No

Developmental Math Seq. (Transfer) Yes N/A No N/A No N/A No No

Remedial Math Progress (SSS) Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No

ESL Progress (SSS) N/A N/A No N/A Yes N/A No No

Course Completion: Developmental Yes N/A No No No N/A No No

Student Success Milestones: College Level

Course Completion: Overall Yes No No No No No No No

Course Completion: Transfer Yes No No No No No No No

Course Completion: CTE Yes No No No No No No No

Course Completion: DE Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No

Persistence (Fall to Spring) Yes2 Yes2 No No No No No No

1st Time Persistence (Fall to Spring) Yes2 Yes2 No No No No No No

Persistence (Fall to Fall) Yes Yes2 No No No No No No

1st Time Persistence (Fall to Fall) Yes Yes No No No No No No

Persistence (SSS) No No No No No No No No

24+ Units Completion Yes Yes No No No No No No

30+ Units Completion (SSS) Yes2 No No No No No No No

Student Success Outcomes

Completion Rate (SSS) Yes2 No No Yes2 Yes2 Yes2 No No

CTE Completion Rate (SSS) No No No No No No No No

Transfer Rate (SSS) No No No No Yes2 Yes No No


7 | P a g e

Table 2: Summary of Disproportionate Impact by Gender

Female Male

Student Access

ENGL-109/110 Placement No No

ENGL-120 Placement No No

MATH-103/110 Placement No No

MATH-120 or above Placement No No

Preparation Rate (SSS) No No


1st Year Enrollment No No

Developmental English Seq. (College) No No

Developmental English Seq. (Transfer) No Yes

Remedial English Progress (SSS) No No

Developmental Math Seq. (College) No Yes

Developmental Math Seq. (Transfer) No Yes

Remedial Math Progress (SSS) No No

ESL Progress (SSS) No Yes

Course Completion: Developmental No No


Course Completion: Overall No No

Course Completion: Transfer No No

Course Completion: CTE No No

Course Completion: DE No No

Persistence (Fall to Spring) No No

1st Time Persistence (Fall to Spring) No No

Persistence (Fall to Fall) No No

1st Time Persistence (Fall to Fall) No No

Persistence (SSS) No No

24+ Units Completion No No

30+ Units Completion (SSS) No No


Completion Rate (SSS) No No

CTE Completion Rate (SSS) No No

Transfer Rate (SSS) No No


8 | P a g e

Table 3: Summary of Disproportionate Impact by Age

<20 years 20-24 years 25-39 years 40+ years

Student Access

ENGL-109/110 Placement No No No No

ENGL-120 Placement Yes Yes No Yes

MATH-103/110 Placement No Yes Yes Yes

MATH-120 or above Placement No Yes Yes Yes

Preparation Rate (SSS) No Yes Yes Yes


1st Year Enrollment No Yes Yes Yes

Developmental English Seq. (College) No Yes Yes Yes

Developmental English Seq. (Transfer) No Yes Yes Yes

Remedial English Progress (SSS) No Yes Yes Yes

Developmental Math Seq. (College) Yes1 Yes No No

Developmental Math Seq. (Transfer) No No No Yes

Remedial Math Progress (SSS) Yes Yes1 No No

ESL Progress (SSS) No Yes1 Yes1 Yes

Course Completion: Developmental No Yes No No


Course Completion: Overall No No No No

Course Completion: Transfer No No No No

Course Completion: CTE No No No No

Course Completion: DE No No No No

Persistence (Fall to Spring) No No No No

1st Time Persistence (Fall to Spring) No Yes Yes Yes

Persistence (Fall to Fall) No Yes1 Yes No

1st Time Persistence (Fall to Fall) No Yes Yes Yes

Persistence (SSS) No No No No

24+ Units Completion No Yes Yes Yes

30+ Units Completion (SSS) No No No No


Completion Rate (SSS) No Yes Yes Yes

CTE Completion Rate (SSS) No No Yes1 Yes

Transfer Rate (SSS) No Yes Yes Yes


9 | P a g e

Table 4: Summary of Disproportionate Impact by Disability Status, Economically Disadvantaged, Veteran Status, Foster Youth, and 1st Generation

Disability

Status

Economically

Disadvantaged

Veteran

Status

Foster

Youth

1st

Generation

Student Access

ENGL-109/110 Placement Yes No No N/A Yes

ENGL-120 Placement Yes Yes No N/A Yes

MATH-103/110 Placement Yes No Yes N/A No

MATH-120 or above Placement Yes Yes1 Yes N/A Yes

Preparation Rate (SSS) Yes Yes Yes N/A N/A


1st Year Enrollment No No Yes2 No No

Developmental English Seq. (College) Yes Yes No N/A No

Developmental English Seq. (Transfer) Yes No No N/A No

Remedial English Progress (SSS) Yes No No N/A N/A

Developmental Math Seq. (College) Yes No No N/A No

Developmental Math Seq. (Transfer) Yes No No N/A No

Remedial Math Progress (SSS) No No No N/A N/A

ESL Progress (SSS) No No N/A N/A N/A

Course Completion: Developmental No No No Yes No


Course Completion: Overall No No No Yes No

Course Completion: Transfer No No No Yes No

Course Completion: CTE No No No Yes No

Course Completion: DE No No No Yes No

Persistence (Fall to Spring) No No No No No

1st Time Persistence (Fall to Spring) No No No No No

Persistence (Fall to Fall) No No No Yes2 No

1st Time Persistence (Fall to Fall) No No No Yes No

Persistence (SSS) No No No N/A N/A

24+ Units Completion Yes No No Yes No

30+ Units Completion (SSS) No No No N/A N/A


Completion Rate (SSS) Yes2 No No N/A N/A

CTE Completion Rate (SSS) No No No N/A N/A

Transfer Rate (SSS) Yes Yes No N/A N/A


10 | P a g e

COLLEGE PROFILE

All Students Based on the GCCCD Research Database, the following tables display the unduplicated student headcount of those who received a grade notation. Annual headcounts include “leading” summers (e.g., summer 2010 enrollments are included in the 2010-2011 annual headcount).

Table 5: Unduplicated Student Headcount Five-Year Trend

Table 6: Unduplicated Student Headcount by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15Five-Year

Average% Change

Summer 2,431 1,229 1,437 2,794 2,395 2,057 -1.5%

Fall 10,239 8,754 8,665 8,996 8,765 9,084 -14.4%

Spring 10,290 9,908 9,236 9,304 9,079 9,563 -11.8%

Total (Unduplicated) 15,464 13,466 13,176 13,896 13,380 13,876 -13.5%

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Female 53.4% 53.0% 52.5% 52.9% 53.9% 53.1%(n = 4,672) (n = 4,590) (n = 4,727) (n = 4,633) (n = 4,933) (n = 23,555)

Male 45.7% 46.2% 46.9% 46.5% 45.2% 46.1%(n = 4,002) (n = 4,005) (n = 4,215) (n = 4,078) (n = 4,130) (n = 20,430)

Unknown 0.9% 0.8% 0.6% 0.6% 0.9% 0.8%(n = 80) (n = 70) (n = 54) (n = 54) (n = 82) (n = 340)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325)


11 | P a g e

Table 7: Unduplicated Student Headcount by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

African-American/Black 6.0% 6.1% 6.2% 5.9% 5.5% 5.9%(n = 523) (n = 526) (n = 559) (n = 513) (n = 502) (n = 2,623)

American Indian 0.4% 0.4% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4%(n = 33) (n = 33) (n = 44) (n = 38) (n = 39) (n = 187)

Asian 3.7% 3.7% 3.4% 3.2% 3.2% 3.4%(n = 322) (n = 317) (n = 306) (n = 284) (n = 292) (n = 1,521)

Filipino 2.4% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%(n = 211) (n = 216) (n = 222) (n = 221) (n = 230) (n = 1,100)

Hispanic/Latino 26.9% 29.3% 31.3% 32.9% 32.0% 30.5%(n = 2,359) (n = 2,540) (n = 2,814) (n = 2,881) (n = 2,928) (n = 13,522)

Pacific Islander 0.7% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.3% 0.5%(n = 61) (n = 47) (n = 49) (n = 41) (n = 32) (n = 230)

White 48.0% 46.8% 45.5% 45.4% 46.6% 46.4%(n = 4,200) (n = 4,051) (n = 4,089) (n = 3,981) (n = 4,264) (n = 20,585)

Two or more 7.6% 7.7% 7.8% 7.7% 8.1% 7.8%(n = 666) (n = 665) (n = 705) (n = 673) (n = 741) (n = 3,450)

Unknown 4.3% 3.1% 2.3% 1.5% 1.3% 2.5%(n = 379) (n = 270) (n = 208) (n = 133) (n = 117) (n = 1,107)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325)


12 | P a g e

Table 8: Unduplicated Student Headcount by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 9: Unduplicated Student Headcount by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

< 20 years 26.9% 25.6% 25.7% 25.3% 26.1% 25.9%(n = 2,353) (n = 2,216) (n = 2,308) (n = 2,219) (n = 2,386) (n = 11,482)

20-24 years 31.4% 33.5% 34.6% 34.2% 33.4% 33.4%(n = 2,746) (n = 2,905) (n = 3,114) (n = 2,994) (n = 3,053) (n = 14,812)

25-39 years 24.9% 25.3% 24.9% 26.2% 26.4% 25.6%(n = 2,184) (n = 2,194) (n = 2,237) (n = 2,298) (n = 2,418) (n = 11,331)

40+ years 16.8% 15.6% 14.9% 14.3% 14.1% 15.1%(n = 1,471) (n = 1,350) (n = 1,337) (n = 1,254) (n = 1,288) (n = 6,700)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 8.3% 9.5% 9.1% 8.9% 8.2% 8.8%(n = 729) (n = 820) (n = 818) (n = 779) (n = 748) (n = 3,894)

No 91.7% 90.5% 90.9% 91.1% 91.8% 91.2%(n = 8,025) (n = 7,845) (n = 8,178) (n = 7,986) (n = 8,397) (n = 40,431)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325)


13 | P a g e

Table 10: Unduplicated Student Headcount by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Table 11: Unduplicated Student Headcount by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 12: Unduplicated Student Headcount by Foster Youth, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 61.0% 63.2% 65.0% 66.1% 66.0% 64.3%(n = 5,341) (n = 5,476) (n = 5,843) (n = 5,792) (n = 6,032) (n = 28,484)

No 39.0% 36.8% 35.0% 33.9% 34.0% 35.7%(n = 3,413) (n = 3,189) (n = 3,153) (n = 2,973) (n = 3,113) (n = 15,841)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 5.7% 6.3% 5.7% 5.2% 4.7% 5.5%(n = 499) (n = 546) (n = 509) (n = 459) (n = 434) (n = 2,447)

No 94.3% 93.7% 94.3% 94.8% 95.3% 94.5%(n = 8,255) (n = 8,119) (n = 8,487) (n = 8,306) (n = 8,711) (n = 41,878)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 0.4% 0.4% 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.4%(n = 31) (n = 34) (n = 31) (n = 30) (n = 33) (n = 159)

No 99.6% 99.6% 99.7% 99.7% 99.6% 99.6%(n = 8,723) (n = 8,631) (n = 8,965) (n = 8,735) (n = 9,112) (n = 44,166)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325)


14 | P a g e

Table 13: Unduplicated Headcount by Recent High School Graduate, Fall 2011-2015

Table 14: Unduplicated Headcount by First Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 11.7% 10.7% 11.8% 10.4% 10.7% 11.0%(n = 1,026) (n = 924) (n = 1,060) (n = 908) (n = 976) (n = 4,894)

No 88.3% 89.3% 88.2% 89.6% 89.3% 89.0%(n = 7,728) (n = 7,741) (n = 7,936) (n = 7,857) (n = 8,169) (n = 39,431)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 18.6% 22.2% 26.8% 30.6% 33.3% 26.4%(n = 1,630) (n = 1,924) (n = 2,409) (n = 2,684) (n = 3,041) (n = 11,688)

No 28.7% 35.8% 42.2% 46.0% 48.0% 40.2%(n = 2,516) (n = 3,102) (n = 3,794) (n = 4,030) (n = 4,391) (n = 17,833)

Unknown/Not reported 52.6% 42.0% 31.0% 23.4% 18.7% 33.4%(n = 4,608) (n = 3,639) (n = 2,793) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,713) (n = 14,804)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325)


15 | P a g e

First-Time Students Figure 2 displays the five-year unduplicated headcount trend of first-time students who received a grade notation.

Figure 2: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount, Fall 2011-2015


16 | P a g e

The following tables display the unduplicated headcounts of first-time students who received a grade notation

Table 15: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Female 46.8% 48.3% 47.0% 48.6% 51.5% 48.4%(n = 787) (n = 782) (n = 889) (n = 856) (n = 952) (n = 4,266)

Male 52.2% 51.0% 52.1% 50.5% 46.9% 50.5%(n = 878) (n = 825) (n = 987) (n = 889) (n = 867) (n = 4,446)

Unknown 1.0% 0.7% 0.9% 1.0% 1.7% 1.1%(n = 17) (n = 11) (n = 17) (n = 17) (n = 31) (n = 93)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805)


17 | P a g e

Table 16: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

African-American/Black 6.9% 8.3% 7.4% 7.4% 5.6% 7.1%(n = 116) (n = 135) (n = 140) (n = 130) (n = 103) (n = 624)

American Indian 0.3% 0.4% 0.3% 0.4% 0.6% 0.4%(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 12) (n = 35)

Asian 2.9% 2.8% 2.6% 2.2% 2.9% 2.7%(n = 114) (n = 45) (n = 50) (n = 39) (n = 53) (n = 235)

Filipino 2.5% 3.1% 2.5% 2.6% 2.1% 2.5%(n = 42) (n = 50) (n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 39) (n = 224)

Hispanic/Latino 35.4% 39.4% 38.9% 37.4% 34.9% 37.2%(n = 596) (n = 638) (n = 737) (n = 659) (n = 646) (n = 3,276)

Pacific Islander 0.4% 0.4% 0.5% 0.4% 0.3% 0.4%(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 36)

White 43.2% 38.9% 40.1% 42.8% 45.6% 42.2%(n = 727) (n = 629) (n = 760) (n = 755) (n = 843) (n = 3,714)

Two or more 6.8% 5.5% 6.7% 6.2% 7.5% 6.5%(n = 114) (n = 89) (n = 126) (n = 109) (n = 138) (n = 576)

Unknown 1.6% 1.2% 1.0% 0.6% 0.5% 1.0%(n = 27) (n = 19) (n = 18) (n = 11) (n = 10) (n = 85)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805)


18 | P a g e

Table 17: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 18: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

< 20 years 58.3% 60.9% 61.3% 58.1% 56.9% 59.1%(n = 981) (n = 986) (n = 1,160) (n = 1,023) (n = 1,052) (n = 5,202)

20-24 years 15.9% 16.7% 15.4% 17.0% 16.9% 16.4%(n = 268) (n = 270) (n = 291) (n = 300) (n = 312) (n = 1,441)

25-39 years 15.6% 15.5% 15.7% 17.8% 18.3% 16.6%(n = 262) (n = 251) (n = 298) (n = 314) (n = 338) (n = 1,463)

40+ years 10.2% 6.9% 7.6% 7.1% 8.0% 7.9%(n = 171) (n = 111) (n = 144) (n = 125) (n = 148) (n = 699)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 7.4% 8.2% 6.2% 5.8% 5.0% 6.5%(n = 124) (n = 133) (n = 118) (n = 103) (n = 93) (n = 571)

No 92.6% 91.8% 93.8% 94.2% 95.0% 93.5%(n = 1,558) (n = 1,485) (n = 1,775) (n = 1,659) (n = 1,757) (n = 8,234)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805)


19 | P a g e

Table 19: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Table 20: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 21: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by Foster Youth, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 62.5% 61.1% 63.5% 64.9% 67.6% 64.0%(n = 1,052) (n = 988) (n = 1,203) (n = 1,143) (n = 1,251) (n = 5,637)

No 37.5% 38.9% 36.5% 35.1% 32.4% 36.0%(n = 630) (n = 630) (n = 690) (n = 619) (n = 599) (n = 3,168)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 4.6% 5.5% 5.1% 4.0% 4.1% 4.6%(n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 96) (n = 71) (n = 75) (n = 409)

No 95.4% 94.5% 94.9% 96.0% 95.9% 95.4%(n = 1,604) (n = 1,529) (n = 1,797) (n = 1,691) (n = 1,775) (n = 8,396)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 0.3% 0.4% 0.3% 0.3% 0.5% 0.4%(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 32)

No 99.7% 99.6% 99.7% 99.7% 99.5% 99.6%(n = 1,677) (n = 1,611) (n = 1,888) (n = 1,757) (n = 1,840) (n = 8,773)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805)


20 | P a g e

Table 22: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by Recent High School Graduate, Fall 2011-2015

Table 23: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by First Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 49.9% 51.9% 51.3% 47.8% 47.9% 49.7%(n = 840) (n = 839) (n = 971) (n = 843) (n = 887) (n = 4,380)

No 50.1% 48.1% 48.7% 52.2% 52.1% 50.3%(n = 842) (n = 779) (n = 922) (n = 919) (n = 963) (n = 4,425)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 33.1% 33.6% 35.6% 34.9% 38.3% 35.2%(n = 556) (n = 544) (n = 673) (n = 615) (n = 709) (n = 3,097)

No 45.6% 56.5% 54.7% 58.1% 53.2% 53.7%(n = 767) (n = 914) (n = 1,036) (n = 1,024) (n = 985) (n = 4,726)

Unknown/Not reported 21.3% 9.9% 9.7% 7.0% 8.4% 11.2%(n = 359) (n = 160) (n = 184) (n = 123) (n = 156) (n = 982)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805)


21 | P a g e

Table 24: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by High School Attendance, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Valhalla 8.0% 9.1% 9.6% 10.2% 9.2% 9.2%(n = 134) (n = 148) (n = 182) (n = 179) (n = 170) (n = 813)

Steele Canyon 8.1% 8.3% 7.1% 7.9% 7.6% 7.8%(n = 137) (n = 135) (n = 134) (n = 139) (n = 140) (n = 685)

Monte Vista 6.8% 7.9% 8.8% 6.9% 6.2% 7.3%(n = 115) (n = 128) (n = 167) (n = 122) (n = 114) (n = 646)

Granite Hills 7.0% 5.7% 5.7% 5.3% 6.6% 6.0%(n = 117) (n = 92) (n = 107) (n = 93) (n = 122) (n = 531)

Mount Miguel 5.6% 4.0% 4.3% 4.0% 3.3% 4.2%(n = 95) (n = 65) (n = 82) (n = 70) (n = 61) (n = 373)

El Cajon Valley 4.3% 4.3% 4.7% 3.4% 3.9% 4.1%(n = 73) (n = 69) (n = 89) (n = 60) (n = 72) (n = 363)

Grossmont 2.2% 3.3% 2.3% 2.8% 3.7% 2.9%(n = 37) (n = 53) (n = 44) (n = 49) (n = 68) (n = 251)

El Capitan 1.6% 1.8% 3.0% 2.0% 1.9% 2.1%(n = 27) (n = 29) (n = 57) (n = 36) (n = 35) (n = 184)

Helix 1.6% 2.0% 3.0% 2.3% 1.4% 2.1%(n = 27) (n = 33) (n = 56) (n = 41) (n = 26) (n = 183)

West Hills 1.4% 1.9% 1.5% 1.3% 1.5% 1.5%(n = 24) (n = 30) (n = 29) (n = 23) (n = 27) (n = 133)

Morse 1.0% 1.4% 1.1% 1.6% 0.8% 1.2%(n = 17) (n = 22) (n = 21) (n = 29) (n = 15) (n = 104)

Santana 0.8% 0.9% 1.3% 1.1% 0.9% 1.0%(n = 13) (n = 14) (n = 24) (n = 20) (n = 17) (n = 88)

Henry 1.2% 1.1% 1.2% 0.9% 0.5% 1.0%(n = 20) (n = 18) (n = 23) (n = 15) (n = 10) (n = 86)

Bonita Vista Senior 0.8% 1.1% 0.9% 1.0% 0.7% 0.9%(n = 14) (n = 18) (n = 17) (n = 18) (n = 13) (n = 80)

Eastlake 1.1% 1.1% 0.6% 0.8% 0.8% 0.9%(n = 19) (n = 18) (n = 11) (n = 14) (n = 14) (n = 76)

Sweetwater 0.6% 1.1% 0.7% 1.2% 0.5% 0.8%(n = 10) (n = 18) (n = 13) (n = 21) (n = 10) (n = 72)

Hilltop Senior 0.6% 1.1% 0.7% 0.7% 0.3% 0.7%(n = 10) (n = 18) (n = 14) (n = 12) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 60)

0.4% 0.8% 1.0% 0.6% 0.5% 0.7%(n = 1 to 9) (n = 13) (n = 18) (n = 10) (n = 10) (n = 58)

Otay Ranch Senior 0.4% 0.6% 0.4% 0.9% 0.6% 0.6%(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 15) (n = 12) (n = 50)

46.3% 42.5% 42.2% 45.2% 49.1% 45.1%(n = 779) (n = 688) (n = 798) (n = 796) (n = 908) (n = 3,969)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805)

Charter School of San

Diego

Other high school/Not

reported


22 | P a g e

STUDENT ACCESS & COLLEGE READINESS

Student Demographics and Service Area The college service area is defined by the zip codes in which 90% of the enrolled students reside in each given academic year (summer, fall, spring). The service area population estimates were extracted from SANDAG on 6/17/2016, and college demographics are from the GCCCD research database.

Table 25: Cuyamaca College Service Area Population and Student Comparison by Race/Ethnicity

CC StudentsService Area

PopulationCC Students

Service Area


Service Area


Service Area


Service Area


Service Area

Population

African-American 7.0% 6.9% 6.0% 6.5% 6.7% 6.2% 6.4% 5.9% 6.1% 6.4% 6.5% 6.4%

Asian 3.9% 11.7% 3.9% 11.5% 3.9% 11.5% 3.6% 11.7% 3.3% 10.3% 3.7% 11.4%

Hispanic 25.2% 38.0% 27.3% 38.7% 28.5% 39.2% 30.7% 39.1% 31.8% 42.7% 28.6% 39.5%

White 47.0% 39.2% 47.2% 39.1% 46.3% 38.9% 45.3% 39.0% 45.5% 36.5% 46.3% 38.6%

Two or more 7.8% 3.2% 8.2% 3.1% 8.1% 3.2% 8.3% 3.2% 8.2% 3.0% 8.1% 3.1%

Unknown/Other 9.1% 1.1% 7.4% 1.1% 6.6% 1.1% 5.6% 1.1% 5.2% 1.1% 6.8% 1.1%

Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Average2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15


23 | P a g e

Table 26: Cuyamaca College Service Area Population and Student Comparison by Gender

Table 27: Cuyamaca College Service Area Population and Student Comparison by Age



Service Area


Service Area


Service Area


Service Area


Service Area

Population

Female 54.9% 50.4% 53.5% 50.3% 53.2% 50.4% 53.8% 50.4% 53.8% 50.7% 53.9% 50.4%

Male 44.4% 49.6% 45.7% 49.7% 46.1% 49.6% 45.5% 49.6% 45.5% 49.3% 45.4% 49.6%

Unknown 0.8% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0%

Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Average



Service Area


Service Area


Service Area


Service Area


Service Area

Population

10-17 years 6.6% 12.9% 2.8% 12.7% 3.0% 12.5% 3.2% 12.5% 3.5% 12.7% 3.9% 12.7%

18-24 years 52.4% 13.1% 55.4% 13.1% 55.6% 13.0% 56.0% 13.0% 56.3% 13.1% 55.1% 13.0%

25-29 years 12.5% 9.4% 13.1% 9.4% 13.2% 9.5% 13.3% 9.4% 13.5% 8.6% 13.1% 9.3%

30-39 years 12.6% 16.3% 12.8% 16.1% 12.9% 16.4% 13.1% 16.4% 12.8% 15.9% 12.8% 16.2%

40-64 years 15.2% 35.9% 15.1% 35.9% 14.5% 35.7% 13.5% 35.5% 12.9% 36.1% 14.3% 35.8%

65+ years 0.7% 12.4% 0.8% 12.6% 0.7% 12.9% 0.9% 13.2% 0.9% 13.6% 0.8% 12.9%

Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Average


24 | P a g e

Assessment Rates and College Readiness English, ESL, and math assessment rates of first-time fall cohort students were examined. It should be noted that in spring 2014, the district changed assessment instruments to ACCUPLACER, thus the fall 2014 cohort primarily assessed using ACCUPLACER whereas earlier cohorts assessed using the prior assessment instruments. Also, many first-time students are exempt from the assessment process via various methods (e.g., AP scores, SAT/ACT scores, EAP, prior coursework, assessments taken at other California community colleges), but the tables include only students who took an assessment at GCCCD.

Table 28: Assessment Rates of First-Time GCCCD Students by Discipline, Fall 2011-2015

English Assessments

Table 29: English Placement Levels, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

English Placement Test 53.9% 55.4% 59.3% 55.1% 49.8% 54.7%(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)

ESL Placement Test 9.9% 7.0% 6.5% 9.0% 12.9% 9.1%(n = 167) (n = 114) (n = 123) (n = 159) (n = 239) (n = 802)

63.6% 61.7% 65.5% 63.3% 61.6% 63.2%(n = 1,069) (n = 999) (n = 1,240) (n = 1,116) (n = 1,139) (n = 5,563)

Math Placement Test 61.5% 60.6% 64.3% 62.0% 56.6% 61.0%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)

1st Time Cohort (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805)

English or ESL

Placement Test

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

ENGL-090 11.6% 13.7% 10.0% 11.9% 13.7% 12.1%(n = 105) (n = 123) (n = 112) (n = 115) (n = 126) (n = 581)

ENGL-098 57.6% 58.0% 57.8% 26.6% 31.3% 46.4%(n = 522) (n = 520) (n = 649) (n = 258) (n = 288) (n = 2,237)

ENGL-109/110 22.5% 17.8% 22.3% 35.5% 35.0% 26.6%(n = 204) (n = 160) (n = 250) (n = 344) (n = 322) (n = 1,280)

ENGL-120 8.4% 10.5% 10.0% 26.1% 20.1% 14.9%

(n = 76) (n = 94) (n = 112) (n = 253) (n = 185) (n = 720)

1st Time Cohort (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)


25 | P a g e

ENGL-090 Placements

Table 30: ENGL-090 Placements by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 31: ENGL-090 Placements by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

African American/Black 26.7% 17.8% 8.2% 21.8% 10.2% 17.1%(n = 60) (n = 73) (n = 61) (n = 55) (n = 49) (n = 298)

American Indian 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 7.1%(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 14)

Asian 22.2% 33.3% 20.0% 46.7% 28.6% 29.3%(n = 18) (n = 18) (n = 20) (n = 15) (n = 28) (n = 99)

Filipino 16.7% 13.0% 0.0% 12.0% 14.3% 10.7%(n = 18) (n = 23) (n = 23) (n = 25) (n = 14) (n = 103)



White 7.6% 12.5% 7.1% 9.5% 16.1% 10.4%(n = 344) (n = 329) (n = 450) (n = 399) (n = 380) (n = 1,902)


Total 11.6% 13.7% 10.0% 11.9% 13.7% 12.1%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Female 12.9% 12.6% 10.5% 12.1% 14.0% 12.3%(n = 420) (n = 454) (n = 545) (n = 478) (n = 443) (n = 2,340)

Male 10.1% 14.5% 9.5% 11.8% 13.5% 11.7%(n = 477) (n = 435) (n = 569) (n = 485) (n = 465) (n = 2,431)

Total 11.6% 13.7% 10.0% 11.9% 13.7% 12.1%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)


26 | P a g e

Table 32: ENGL-090 Placements by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 33: ENGL-090 Placements by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

< 20 years 10.1% 13.1% 9.7% 11.3% 12.8% 11.3%

(n = 775) (n = 753) (n = 937) (n = 787) (n = 743) (n = 3,995)

20-24 years 17.9% 21.2% 11.8% 12.3% 11.2% 14.4%(n = 67) (n = 66) (n = 85) (n = 81) (n = 98) (n = 397)

25-39 years 15.2% 14.8% 6.9% 15.7% 25.8% 15.4%(n = 46) (n = 61) (n = 72) (n = 83) (n = 62) (n = 324)

40+ years 42.1% 5.9% 20.7% 15.8% 22.2% 21.6%(n = 19) (n = 17) (n = 29) (n = 19) (n = 18) (n = 102)

Total 11.6% 13.7% 10.0% 11.9% 13.7% 12.1%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 39.7% 26.4% 29.1% 32.4% 27.3% 30.7%(n = 63) (n = 87) (n = 79) (n = 71) (n = 55) (n = 355)

No 9.5% 12.3% 8.5% 10.2% 12.8% 10.6%(n = 844) (n = 810) (n = 1,044) (n = 899) (n = 866) (n = 4,463)

Total 11.6% 13.7% 10.0% 11.9% 13.7% 12.1%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)


27 | P a g e

Table 34: ENGL-090 Placements by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Table 35: ENGL-090 Placements by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 36: ENGL-090 Placements by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 14.3% 16.1% 12.6% 13.7% 17.1% 14.7%(n = 574) (n = 584) (n = 755) (n = 677) (n = 662) (n = 3,252)

No 6.9% 9.3% 4.6% 7.5% 5.0% 6.6%(n = 333) (n = 313) (n = 368) (n = 293) (n = 259) (n = 1,566)

Total 11.6% 13.7% 10.0% 11.9% 13.7% 12.1%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 11.4% 7.3% 2.4% 3.4% 3.6% 5.7%(n = 35) (n = 41) (n = 41) (n = 29) (n = 28) (n = 174)

No 11.6% 14.0% 10.3% 12.1% 14.0% 12.3%(n = 872) (n = 856) (n = 1,082) (n = 941) (n = 893) (n = 4,644)

Total 11.6% 13.7% 10.0% 11.9% 13.7% 12.1%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 0.0% 20.0% 25.0% 0.0% 33.3% 19.2%(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 26)

No 11.6% 13.7% 9.9% 11.9% 13.5% 12.0%(n = 904) (n = 892) (n = 1,119) (n = 965) (n = 912) (n = 4,792)

Total 11.6% 13.7% 10.0% 11.9% 13.7% 12.1%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)


28 | P a g e

Table 37: ENGL-090 Placements by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 17.2% 17.6% 15.2% 16.7% 18.0% 16.9%(n = 309) (n = 306) (n = 401) (n = 342) (n = 362) (n = 1,720)

No 7.4% 10.1% 5.3% 7.9% 9.8% 8.0%(n = 446) (n = 514) (n = 619) (n = 569) (n = 502) (n = 2,650)

Total 11.6% 13.7% 10.0% 11.9% 13.7% 12.1%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)


29 | P a g e

ENGL-098 Placements



Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average



Asian 61.1% 61.1% 50.0% 6.7% 21.4% 39.4%(n = 18) (n = 18) (n = 20) (n = 15) (n = 28) (n = 99)

Filipino 61.1% 78.3% 69.6% 32.0% 50.0% 58.3%(n = 18) (n = 23) (n = 23) (n = 25) (n = 14) (n = 103)



White 53.8% 47.7% 49.1% 21.6% 23.7% 38.9%(n = 344) (n = 329) (n = 450) (n = 399) (n = 380) (n = 1,902)


Total 57.6% 58.0% 57.8% 26.6% 31.3% 46.4%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Female 59.5% 60.6% 57.6% 26.2% 33.6% 47.6%(n = 420) (n = 454) (n = 545) (n = 478) (n = 443) (n = 2,340)

Male 56.6% 55.6% 58.0% 26.8% 28.8% 45.5%(n = 477) (n = 435) (n = 569) (n = 485) (n = 465) (n = 2,431)

Total 57.6% 58.0% 57.8% 26.6% 31.3% 46.4%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)


30 | P a g e



Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

< 20 years 58.5% 59.8% 60.1% 27.2% 32.4% 48.1%

(n = 775) (n = 753) (n = 937) (n = 787) (n = 743) (n = 3,995)

20-24 years 64.2% 48.5% 48.2% 30.9% 30.6% 43.1%(n = 67) (n = 66) (n = 85) (n = 81) (n = 98) (n = 397)

25-39 years 45.7% 50.8% 43.1% 19.3% 22.6% 34.9%(n = 46) (n = 61) (n = 72) (n = 83) (n = 62) (n = 324)

40+ years 26.3% 41.2% 48.3% 15.8% 16.7% 31.4%(n = 19) (n = 17) (n = 29) (n = 19) (n = 18) (n = 102)

Total 57.6% 58.0% 57.8% 26.6% 31.3% 46.4%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 41.3% 58.6% 51.9% 23.9% 25.5% 42.0%(n = 63) (n = 87) (n = 79) (n = 71) (n = 55) (n = 355)

No 58.8% 57.9% 58.2% 26.8% 31.6% 46.8%(n = 844) (n = 810) (n = 1,044) (n = 899) (n = 866) (n = 4,463)

Total 57.6% 58.0% 57.8% 26.6% 31.3% 46.4%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)


31 | P a g e




Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 58.5% 59.8% 60.9% 28.8% 32.9% 47.9%(n = 574) (n = 584) (n = 755) (n = 677) (n = 662) (n = 3,252)

No 55.9% 54.6% 51.4% 21.5% 27.0% 43.4%(n = 333) (n = 313) (n = 368) (n = 293) (n = 259) (n = 1,566)

Total 57.6% 58.0% 57.8% 26.6% 31.3% 46.4%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 45.7% 46.3% 48.8% 10.3% 28.6% 37.9%(n = 35) (n = 41) (n = 41) (n = 29) (n = 28) (n = 174)

No 58.0% 58.5% 58.1% 27.1% 31.4% 46.7%(n = 872) (n = 856) (n = 1,082) (n = 941) (n = 893) (n = 4,644)

Total 57.6% 58.0% 57.8% 26.6% 31.3% 46.4%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 66.7% 80.0% 50.0% 40.0% 22.2% 46.2%(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 26)

No 57.5% 57.8% 57.8% 26.5% 31.4% 46.4%(n = 904) (n = 892) (n = 1,119) (n = 965) (n = 912) (n = 4,792)

Total 57.6% 58.0% 57.8% 26.6% 31.3% 46.4%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)


32 | P a g e


Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 60.2% 67.6% 61.1% 30.1% 38.1% 51.1%(n = 309) (n = 306) (n = 401) (n = 342) (n = 362) (n = 1,720)

No 55.8% 53.5% 55.1% 24.4% 25.3% 42.7%(n = 446) (n = 514) (n = 619) (n = 569) (n = 502) (n = 2,650)

Total 57.6% 58.0% 57.8% 26.6% 31.3% 46.4%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)


33 | P a g e

ENGL-109/110 Placements

Table 46: ENGL-109/110 Placements by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 47: ENGL-109/110 Placements by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

African American/Black 16.7% 11.0% 13.1% 34.5% 44.9% 22.5% YES 0.85(n = 60) (n = 73) (n = 61) (n = 55) (n = 49) (n = 298)

American Indian 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 33.3% 0.0% 14.3% YES* 0.54(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 14)

Asian 16.7% 5.6% 25.0% 20.0% 17.9% 17.2% YES 0.65(n = 18) (n = 18) (n = 20) (n = 15) (n = 28) (n = 99)

Filipino 11.1% 8.7% 26.1% 28.0% 35.7% 21.4% YES 0.80(n = 18) (n = 23) (n = 23) (n = 25) (n = 14) (n = 103)

Hispanic/Latino 20.3% 16.5% 16.8% 36.2% 35.5% 24.8% NO 0.93(n = 375) (n = 387) (n = 481) (n = 403) (n = 380) (n = 2,026)

Pacific Islander 25.0% 40.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 38.9% NO* 1.46(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 18)

White 26.7% 22.2% 29.1% 36.8% 35.0% 30.3% NO 1.14(n = 344) (n = 329) (n = 450) (n = 399) (n = 380) (n = 1,902)

Two or more 23.5% 19.6% 18.9% 29.2% 33.3% 24.9% NO 0.94(n = 68) (n = 51) (n = 74) (n = 65) (n = 63) (n = 321)

Total 22.5% 17.8% 22.3% 35.5% 35.0% 26.6% 24.2%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (White)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 20.2% 17.0% 20.7% 37.7% 32.7% 25.6% NO 0.97(n = 420) (n = 454) (n = 545) (n = 478) (n = 443) (n = 2,340)

Male 24.3% 18.9% 23.6% 33.6% 37.2% 27.5% NO 1.03(n = 477) (n = 435) (n = 569) (n = 485) (n = 465) (n = 2,431)

Total 22.5% 17.8% 22.3% 35.5% 35.0% 26.6% 22.0%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Male)


34 | P a g e

Table 48: ENGL-109/110 Placements by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 49: ENGL-109/110 Placements by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 50: ENGL-109/110 Placements by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 22.8% 18.1% 21.2% 36.6% 35.9% 26.7% NO 1.01(n = 775) (n = 753) (n = 937) (n = 787) (n = 743) (n = 3,995)

20-24 years 14.9% 16.7% 24.7% 28.4% 35.7% 25.2% NO 0.95(n = 67) (n = 66) (n = 85) (n = 81) (n = 98) (n = 397)

25-39 years 26.1% 13.1% 30.6% 32.5% 22.6% 25.6% NO 0.96(n = 46) (n = 61) (n = 72) (n = 83) (n = 62) (n = 324)

40+ years 26.3% 29.4% 27.6% 31.6% 33.3% 29.4% NO 1.11(n = 19) (n = 17) (n = 29) (n = 19) (n = 18) (n = 102)

Total 22.5% 17.8% 22.3% 35.5% 35.0% 26.6% 23.5%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (40+ years)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 12.7% 9.2% 13.9% 28.2% 34.5% 18.6% YES 0.70(n = 63) (n = 87) (n = 79) (n = 71) (n = 55) (n = 355)

No 23.2% 18.8% 22.9% 36.0% 35.0% 27.2% NO 1.02(n = 844) (n = 810) (n = 1,044) (n = 899) (n = 866) (n = 4,463)

Total 22.5% 17.8% 22.3% 35.5% 35.0% 26.6% 21.8%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 20.0% 16.6% 19.3% 34.9% 32.9% 25.0% NO 0.94(n = 574) (n = 584) (n = 755) (n = 677) (n = 662) (n = 3,252)

No 26.7% 20.1% 28.3% 36.9% 40.2% 29.9% NO 1.12(n = 333) (n = 313) (n = 368) (n = 293) (n = 259) (n = 1,566)

Total 22.5% 17.8% 22.3% 35.5% 35.0% 26.6% 23.9%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not Econ)


35 | P a g e

Table 51: ENGL-109/110 Placements by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 52: ENGL-109/110 Placements by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 53: ENGL-109/110 Placements by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 28.6% 24.4% 43.9% 34.5% 28.6% 32.2% NO 1.21(n = 35) (n = 41) (n = 41) (n = 29) (n = 28) (n = 174)

No 22.2% 17.5% 21.4% 35.5% 35.2% 26.4% NO 0.99(n = 872) (n = 856) (n = 1,082) (n = 941) (n = 893) (n = 4,644)

Total 22.5% 17.8% 22.3% 35.5% 35.0% 26.6% 21.1%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not Vet)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 33.3% 0.0% 25.0% 20.0% 22.2% 19.2% YES* 0.72(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 26)

No 22.5% 17.9% 22.3% 35.5% 35.1% 26.6% NO 1.00(n = 904) (n = 892) (n = 1,119) (n = 965) (n = 912) (n = 4,792)

Total 22.5% 17.8% 22.3% 35.5% 35.0% 26.6% 21.3%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not FY)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 17.2% 10.5% 18.0% 36.0% 30.4% 22.7% YES 0.85(n = 309) (n = 306) (n = 401) (n = 342) (n = 362) (n = 1,720)

No 25.3% 21.4% 25.8% 35.1% 38.8% 29.4% NO 1.11(n = 446) (n = 514) (n = 619) (n = 569) (n = 502) (n = 2,650)

Total 22.5% 17.8% 22.3% 35.5% 35.0% 26.6% 23.5%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not FG)


36 | P a g e

ENGL-120 Placements



Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test


American Indian 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 33.3% 100.0% 21.4% NO* 1.43(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 14)

Asian 0.0% 0.0% 5.0% 26.7% 32.1% 14.1% YES 0.95(n = 18) (n = 18) (n = 20) (n = 15) (n = 28) (n = 99)


Hispanic/Latino 6.9% 6.7% 5.0% 20.6% 15.5% 10.8% YES 0.72(n = 375) (n = 387) (n = 481) (n = 403) (n = 380) (n = 2,026)

Pacific Islander 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 11.1% YES* 0.74(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 18)

White 11.9% 17.6% 14.7% 32.1% 25.3% 20.5% NO 1.37(n = 344) (n = 329) (n = 450) (n = 399) (n = 380) (n = 1,902)


Total 8.4% 10.5% 10.0% 26.1% 20.1% 14.9% 16.4%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (White)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 7.4% 9.9% 11.2% 24.1% 19.6% 14.5% NO 0.97(n = 420) (n = 454) (n = 545) (n = 478) (n = 443) (n = 2,340)

Male 9.0% 11.0% 9.0% 27.8% 20.4% 15.3% NO 1.02(n = 477) (n = 435) (n = 569) (n = 485) (n = 465) (n = 2,431)

Total 8.4% 10.5% 10.0% 26.1% 20.1% 14.9% 12.2%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Male)


37 | P a g e




Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 8.6% 9.0% 9.0% 24.9% 18.8% 13.9% YES 0.93(n = 775) (n = 753) (n = 937) (n = 787) (n = 743) (n = 3,995)

20-24 years 3.0% 13.6% 15.3% 28.4% 22.4% 17.4% YES 1.16(n = 67) (n = 66) (n = 85) (n = 81) (n = 98) (n = 397)

25-39 years 13.0% 21.3% 19.4% 32.5% 29.0% 24.1% NO 1.61(n = 46) (n = 61) (n = 72) (n = 83) (n = 62) (n = 324)

40+ years 5.3% 23.5% 3.4% 36.8% 27.8% 17.6% YES 1.18(n = 19) (n = 17) (n = 29) (n = 19) (n = 18) (n = 102)

Total 8.4% 10.5% 10.0% 26.1% 20.1% 14.9% 19.3%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (25-39 years)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 6.3% 5.7% 5.1% 15.5% 12.7% 8.7% YES 0.58(n = 63) (n = 87) (n = 79) (n = 71) (n = 55) (n = 355)

No 8.5% 11.0% 10.3% 26.9% 20.6% 15.4% NO 1.03(n = 844) (n = 810) (n = 1,044) (n = 899) (n = 866) (n = 4,463)

Total 8.4% 10.5% 10.0% 26.1% 20.1% 14.9% 12.4%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 7.1% 7.5% 7.2% 22.6% 17.1% 12.5% YES 0.83(n = 574) (n = 584) (n = 755) (n = 677) (n = 662) (n = 3,252)

No 10.5% 16.0% 15.8% 34.1% 27.8% 20.1% NO 1.35(n = 333) (n = 313) (n = 368) (n = 293) (n = 259) (n = 1,566)

Total 8.4% 10.5% 10.0% 26.1% 20.1% 14.9% 16.1%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not Econ)


38 | P a g e




Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 14.3% 22.0% 4.9% 51.7% 39.3% 24.1% NO 1.62(n = 35) (n = 41) (n = 41) (n = 29) (n = 28) (n = 174)

No 8.1% 9.9% 10.2% 25.3% 19.5% 14.6% NO 0.98(n = 872) (n = 856) (n = 1,082) (n = 941) (n = 893) (n = 4,644)

Total 8.4% 10.5% 10.0% 26.1% 20.1% 14.9% 11.7%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not Vet)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 22.2% 15.4% NO* 1.03(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 26)

No 8.4% 10.5% 10.0% 26.0% 20.1% 14.9% NO 1.00(n = 904) (n = 892) (n = 1,119) (n = 965) (n = 912) (n = 4,792)

Total 8.4% 10.5% 10.0% 26.1% 20.1% 14.9% 12.0%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not FY)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 5.5% 4.2% 5.7% 17.3% 13.5% 9.4% YES 0.63(n = 309) (n = 306) (n = 401) (n = 342) (n = 362) (n = 1,720)

No 11.4% 15.0% 13.7% 32.5% 26.1% 20.0% NO 1.34(n = 446) (n = 514) (n = 619) (n = 569) (n = 502) (n = 2,650)

Total 8.4% 10.5% 10.0% 26.1% 20.1% 14.9% 16.0%

(n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not FG)


39 | P a g e

Math Assessments

Table 62: Math Placement Levels of First-Time GCCCD Students, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

MATH-088 18.7% 19.9% 18.2% 29.7% 25.4% 22.4%(n = 194) (n = 195) (n = 222) (n = 325) (n = 266) (n = 1,202)

MATH-090 32.5% 36.2% 33.2% 19.4% 26.3% 29.4%(n = 336) (n = 355) (n = 404) (n = 212) (n = 275) (n = 1,582)

MATH-103/110 25.5% 24.5% 27.1% 38.1% 25.6% 28.3%(n = 264) (n = 240) (n = 330) (n = 416) (n = 268) (n = 1,518)

MATH-120 or above 23.3% 19.4% 21.4% 12.8% 22.7% 19.9%

(n = 241) (n = 190) (n = 261) (n = 140) (n = 238) (n = 1,070)

1st Time Cohort (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)


40 | P a g e

Math-088 Assessments

Table 63: MATH-088 Placements by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 64: MATH-088 Placements by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average



Asian 13.6% 27.3% 4.3% 38.1% 22.2% 20.9%(n = 22) (n = 22) (n = 23) (n = 21) (n = 27) (n = 115)

Filipino 18.8% 9.5% 13.6% 8.3% 11.8% 12.0%(n = 16) (n = 21) (n = 22) (n = 24) (n = 17) (n = 100)



White 26.8% 20.4% 20.8% 31.1% 28.3% 25.6%(n = 444) (n = 388) (n = 520) (n = 489) (n = 480) (n = 2,321)


Total 18.7% 19.9% 18.2% 29.7% 25.4% 22.4%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Female 22.8% 21.0% 19.4% 33.1% 28.5% 25.0%(n = 486) (n = 499) (n = 587) (n = 556) (n = 522) (n = 2,650)

Male 15.2% 18.6% 17.1% 26.0% 22.0% 19.7%(n = 539) (n = 472) (n = 620) (n = 526) (n = 510) (n = 2,667)

Total 18.7% 19.9% 18.2% 29.7% 25.4% 22.4%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)


41 | P a g e

Table 65: MATH-088 Placements by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 66: MATH-088 Placements by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

< 20 years 7.0% 10.7% 7.9% 20.1% 17.6% 12.5%

(n = 791) (n = 787) (n = 961) (n = 835) (n = 731) (n = 4,105)

20-24 years 37.3% 42.9% 39.0% 46.7% 34.9% 39.8%(n = 102) (n = 77) (n = 105) (n = 105) (n = 129) (n = 518)

25-39 years 67.7% 61.7% 61.8% 69.8% 47.5% 61.2%(n = 93) (n = 81) (n = 102) (n = 106) (n = 120) (n = 502)

40+ years 77.6% 80.0% 85.7% 72.3% 52.2% 71.7%(n = 49) (n = 35) (n = 49) (n = 47) (n = 67) (n = 247)

Total 18.7% 19.9% 18.2% 29.7% 25.4% 22.4%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 44.2% 29.7% 34.5% 56.4% 43.3% 41.0%(n = 77) (n = 91) (n = 87) (n = 78) (n = 67) (n = 400)

No 16.7% 18.9% 17.0% 27.7% 24.2% 20.9%(n = 958) (n = 889) (n = 1,130) (n = 1,015) (n = 980) (n = 4,972)

Total 18.7% 19.9% 18.2% 29.7% 25.4% 22.4%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)


42 | P a g e

Table 67: MATH-088 Placements by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Table 68: MATH-088 Placements by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 69: MATH-088 Placements by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 24.4% 23.3% 21.0% 33.2% 29.1% 26.3%(n = 692) (n = 660) (n = 828) (n = 792) (n = 776) (n = 3,748)

No 7.3% 12.8% 12.3% 20.6% 14.8% 13.3%(n = 343) (n = 320) (n = 389) (n = 301) (n = 271) (n = 1,624)

Total 18.7% 19.9% 18.2% 29.7% 25.4% 22.4%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 29.7% 39.1% 40.0% 39.4% 25.0% 35.2%(n = 37) (n = 46) (n = 45) (n = 33) (n = 32) (n = 193)

No 18.3% 19.0% 17.4% 29.4% 25.4% 21.9%(n = 998) (n = 934) (n = 1,172) (n = 1,060) (n = 1,015) (n = 5,179)

Total 18.7% 19.9% 18.2% 29.7% 25.4% 22.4%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average


No 18.7% 19.9% 18.1% 29.8% 25.4% 22.3%(n = 1,033) (n = 975) (n = 1,213) (n = 1,088) (n = 1,037) (n = 5,346)

Total 18.7% 19.9% 18.2% 29.7% 25.4% 22.4%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)


43 | P a g e

Table 70: MATH-088 Placement by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 25.7% 27.8% 22.4% 35.8% 29.9% 28.3%(n = 385) (n = 353) (n = 442) (n = 399) (n = 431) (n = 2,010)

No 10.7% 10.8% 12.2% 23.0% 17.5% 15.1%(n = 458) (n = 520) (n = 638) (n = 608) (n = 519) (n = 2,743)

Total 18.7% 19.9% 18.2% 29.7% 25.4% 22.4%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)


44 | P a g e

MATH-090 Placements

Table 71: MATH-090 Placements by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 72: MATH-090 Placements by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average



Asian 40.9% 22.7% 21.7% 14.3% 22.2% 24.3%(n = 22) (n = 22) (n = 23) (n = 21) (n = 27) (n = 115)

Filipino 37.5% 33.3% 36.4% 12.5% 35.3% 30.0%(n = 16) (n = 21) (n = 22) (n = 24) (n = 17) (n = 100)



White 25.2% 33.2% 30.2% 18.0% 22.7% 25.6%(n = 444) (n = 388) (n = 520) (n = 489) (n = 480) (n = 2,321)


Total 32.5% 36.2% 33.2% 19.4% 26.3% 29.4%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Female 31.7% 35.3% 34.8% 19.2% 27.8% 29.7%(n = 486) (n = 499) (n = 587) (n = 556) (n = 522) (n = 2,650)

Male 33.4% 36.9% 31.9% 20.0% 25.1% 29.4%(n = 539) (n = 472) (n = 620) (n = 526) (n = 510) (n = 2,667)

Total 32.5% 36.2% 33.2% 19.4% 26.3% 29.4%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)


45 | P a g e

Table 73: MATH-090 Placements by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 74: MATH-090 Placements by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

< 20 years 33.5% 38.4% 34.9% 19.8% 24.2% 30.3%

(n = 791) (n = 787) (n = 961) (n = 835) (n = 731) (n = 4,105)

20-24 years 41.2% 33.8% 34.3% 25.7% 31.0% 33.0%(n = 102) (n = 77) (n = 105) (n = 105) (n = 129) (n = 518)

25-39 years 22.6% 27.2% 26.5% 12.3% 32.5% 24.3%(n = 93) (n = 81) (n = 102) (n = 106) (n = 120) (n = 502)

40+ years 16.3% 14.3% 12.2% 14.9% 28.4% 18.2%(n = 49) (n = 35) (n = 49) (n = 47) (n = 67) (n = 247)

Total 32.5% 36.2% 33.2% 19.4% 26.3% 29.4%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 33.8% 40.7% 46.0% 17.9% 29.9% 34.3%(n = 77) (n = 91) (n = 87) (n = 78) (n = 67) (n = 400)

No 32.4% 35.8% 32.2% 19.5% 26.0% 29.1%(n = 958) (n = 889) (n = 1,130) (n = 1,015) (n = 980) (n = 4,972)

Total 32.5% 36.2% 33.2% 19.4% 26.3% 29.4%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)


46 | P a g e

Table 75: MATH-090 Placements by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Table 76: MATH-090 Placements by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 77: MATH-090 Placements by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 33.1% 35.0% 33.9% 19.1% 24.7% 28.9%(n = 692) (n = 660) (n = 828) (n = 792) (n = 776) (n = 3,748)

No 31.2% 38.8% 31.6% 20.3% 30.6% 30.7%(n = 343) (n = 320) (n = 389) (n = 301) (n = 271) (n = 1,624)

Total 32.5% 36.2% 33.2% 19.4% 26.3% 29.4%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 45.9% 39.1% 35.6% 27.3% 43.8% 38.3%(n = 37) (n = 46) (n = 45) (n = 33) (n = 32) (n = 193)

No 32.0% 36.1% 33.1% 19.2% 25.7% 29.1%(n = 998) (n = 934) (n = 1,172) (n = 1,060) (n = 1,015) (n = 5,179)

Total 32.5% 36.2% 33.2% 19.4% 26.3% 29.4%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average


No 32.5% 36.1% 33.2% 19.2% 25.8% 29.3%(n = 1,033) (n = 975) (n = 1,213) (n = 1,088) (n = 1,037) (n = 5,346)

Total 32.5% 36.2% 33.2% 19.4% 26.3% 29.4%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)


47 | P a g e

Table 78: Placements by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 33.5% 36.3% 35.5% 20.6% 30.2% 31.1%(n = 385) (n = 353) (n = 442) (n = 399) (n = 431) (n = 2,010)

No 31.7% 36.2% 32.8% 19.1% 24.3% 28.6%(n = 458) (n = 520) (n = 638) (n = 608) (n = 519) (n = 2,743)

Total 32.5% 36.2% 33.2% 19.4% 26.3% 29.4%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)


48 | P a g e

MATH-103/110 Placements

Table 79: MATH-103/110 Placements by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 80: MATH-103/110 Placements by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test



Asian 13.6% 22.7% 39.1% 23.8% 29.6% 26.1% NO 0.92(n = 22) (n = 22) (n = 23) (n = 21) (n = 27) (n = 115)

Filipino 12.5% 19.0% 9.1% 66.7% 29.4% 29.0% NO* 1.03(n = 16) (n = 21) (n = 22) (n = 24) (n = 17) (n = 100)



White 24.3% 25.3% 24.4% 36.6% 23.3% 26.9% NO 0.95(n = 444) (n = 388) (n = 520) (n = 489) (n = 480) (n = 2,321)


Total 25.5% 24.5% 27.1% 38.1% 25.6% 28.3% 24.4%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Latino)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 23.5% 25.1% 28.3% 36.2% 24.1% 27.6% NO 0.98(n = 486) (n = 499) (n = 587) (n = 556) (n = 522) (n = 2,650)

Male 27.1% 23.9% 26.0% 39.7% 27.3% 28.8% NO 1.02(n = 539) (n = 472) (n = 620) (n = 526) (n = 510) (n = 2,667)

Total 25.5% 24.5% 27.1% 38.1% 25.6% 28.3% 23.0%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Male)


49 | P a g e

Table 81: MATH-103/110 Placements by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 82: MATH-103/110 Placements by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 83: MATH-103/110 Placements by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 31.0% 27.3% 31.8% 45.1% 31.5% 33.4% NO 1.18(n = 791) (n = 787) (n = 961) (n = 835) (n = 731) (n = 4,105)

20-24 years 10.8% 22.1% 16.2% 21.9% 19.4% 18.0% YES 0.64(n = 102) (n = 77) (n = 105) (n = 105) (n = 129) (n = 518)

25-39 years 6.5% 8.6% 6.9% 12.3% 6.7% 8.2% YES 0.29(n = 93) (n = 81) (n = 102) (n = 106) (n = 120) (n = 502)

40+ years 4.1% 2.9% 0.0% 6.4% 7.5% 4.5% YES 0.16(n = 49) (n = 35) (n = 49) (n = 47) (n = 67) (n = 247)

Total 25.5% 24.5% 27.1% 38.1% 25.6% 28.3% 26.8%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (< 20 years)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 13.0% 17.6% 11.5% 17.9% 16.4% 15.3% YES 0.54(n = 77) (n = 91) (n = 87) (n = 78) (n = 67) (n = 400)

No 26.5% 25.2% 28.3% 39.6% 26.2% 29.3% NO 1.04(n = 958) (n = 889) (n = 1,130) (n = 1,015) (n = 980) (n = 4,972)

Total 25.5% 24.5% 27.1% 38.1% 25.6% 28.3% 23.4%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 22.0% 22.3% 26.6% 35.6% 26.4% 26.8% NO 0.95(n = 692) (n = 660) (n = 828) (n = 792) (n = 776) (n = 3,748)

No 32.7% 29.1% 28.3% 44.5% 23.2% 31.5% NO 1.12(n = 343) (n = 320) (n = 389) (n = 301) (n = 271) (n = 1,624)

Total 25.5% 24.5% 27.1% 38.1% 25.6% 28.3% 25.2%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not Econ)


50 | P a g e

Table 84: MATH-103/110 Placements by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 85: MATH-103/110 Placements by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 86: MATH-103/110 Placements by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 16.2% 15.2% 15.6% 27.3% 21.9% 18.7% YES 0.66(n = 37) (n = 46) (n = 45) (n = 33) (n = 32) (n = 193)

No 25.9% 24.9% 27.6% 38.4% 25.7% 28.6% NO 1.01(n = 998) (n = 934) (n = 1,172) (n = 1,060) (n = 1,015) (n = 5,179)

Total 25.5% 24.5% 27.1% 38.1% 25.6% 28.3% 22.9%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not Vet)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 50.0% 0.0% 25.0% 20.0% 0.0% 11.5% YES* 0.41(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 26)

No 25.5% 24.6% 27.1% 38.1% 25.8% 28.3% NO 1.00(n = 1,033) (n = 975) (n = 1,213) (n = 1,088) (n = 1,037) (n = 5,346)

Total 25.5% 24.5% 27.1% 38.1% 25.6% 28.3% 22.7%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not FY)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 23.1% 20.4% 26.5% 33.1% 24.8% 25.7% NO 0.91(n = 385) (n = 353) (n = 442) (n = 399) (n = 431) (n = 2,010)

No 28.6% 28.8% 28.7% 42.9% 27.9% 31.7% NO 1.12(n = 458) (n = 520) (n = 638) (n = 608) (n = 519) (n = 2,743)

Total 25.5% 24.5% 27.1% 38.1% 25.6% 28.3% 25.4%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not FG)


51 | P a g e

MATH-120 or Above Placements

Table 87: MATH-120 or Above Placements by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 88: MATH-120 or Above Placements by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test



Asian 31.8% 27.3% 34.8% 23.8% 25.9% 28.7% NO 1.44(n = 22) (n = 22) (n = 23) (n = 21) (n = 27) (n = 115)


Hispanic/Latino 23.3% 19.1% 18.2% 11.4% 21.1% 18.5% YES 0.93(n = 387) (n = 403) (n = 499) (n = 414) (n = 379) (n = 2,082)


White 23.6% 21.1% 24.6% 14.3% 25.6% 21.9% YES 1.10(n = 444) (n = 388) (n = 520) (n = 489) (n = 480) (n = 2,321)

Two or more 25.0% 13.0% 25.7% 13.9% 19.3% 19.8% YES 0.99(n = 76) (n = 54) (n = 74) (n = 72) (n = 83) (n = 359)

Total 23.3% 19.4% 21.4% 12.8% 22.7% 19.9% 23.0%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Asian)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 22.0% 18.6% 17.5% 11.5% 19.5% 17.7% NO 0.89(n = 486) (n = 499) (n = 587) (n = 556) (n = 522) (n = 2,650)

Male 24.3% 20.6% 25.0% 14.3% 25.7% 22.1% NO 1.11(n = 539) (n = 472) (n = 620) (n = 526) (n = 510) (n = 2,667)

Total 23.3% 19.4% 21.4% 12.8% 22.7% 19.9% 17.7%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Male)


52 | P a g e

Table 89: MATH-120 or Above Placements by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 90: MATH-120 or Above Placements by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 91: MATH-120 or Above Placements by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 28.6% 23.6% 25.4% 15.0% 26.7% 23.8% NO 1.19(n = 791) (n = 787) (n = 961) (n = 835) (n = 731) (n = 4,105)

20-24 years 10.8% 1.3% 10.5% 5.7% 14.7% 9.3% YES 0.47(n = 102) (n = 77) (n = 105) (n = 105) (n = 129) (n = 518)

25-39 years 3.2% 2.5% 4.9% 5.7% 13.3% 6.4% YES 0.32(n = 93) (n = 81) (n = 102) (n = 106) (n = 120) (n = 502)

40+ years 2.0% 2.9% 2.0% 6.4% 11.9% 5.7% YES 0.28(n = 49) (n = 35) (n = 49) (n = 47) (n = 67) (n = 247)

Total 23.3% 19.4% 21.4% 12.8% 22.7% 19.9% 19.0%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (<20 years)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 9.1% 12.1% 8.0% 7.7% 10.4% 9.5% YES 0.48(n = 77) (n = 91) (n = 87) (n = 78) (n = 67) (n = 400)

No 24.4% 20.1% 22.5% 13.2% 23.6% 20.8% NO 1.04(n = 958) (n = 889) (n = 1,130) (n = 1,015) (n = 980) (n = 4,972)

Total 23.3% 19.4% 21.4% 12.8% 22.7% 19.9% 16.6%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 20.5% 19.4% 18.5% 12.1% 19.7% 17.9% YES 0.90(n = 692) (n = 660) (n = 828) (n = 792) (n = 776) (n = 3,748)

No 28.9% 19.4% 27.8% 14.6% 31.4% 24.5% NO 1.23(n = 343) (n = 320) (n = 389) (n = 301) (n = 271) (n = 1,624)

Total 23.3% 19.4% 21.4% 12.8% 22.7% 19.9% 19.6%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not Econ)


53 | P a g e

Table 92: MATH-120 or Above Placements by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 93: MATH-120 or Above Placements by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 94: MATH-120 or Above Placements by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 8.1% 6.5% 8.9% 6.1% 9.4% 7.8% YES 0.39(n = 37) (n = 46) (n = 45) (n = 33) (n = 32) (n = 193)

No 23.8% 20.0% 21.9% 13.0% 23.2% 20.4% NO 1.02(n = 998) (n = 934) (n = 1,172) (n = 1,060) (n = 1,015) (n = 5,179)

Total 23.3% 19.4% 21.4% 12.8% 22.7% 19.9% 16.3%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not Vet)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test


No 23.3% 19.4% 21.5% 12.9% 23.0% 20.0% NO 1.00(n = 1,033) (n = 975) (n = 1,213) (n = 1,088) (n = 1,037) (n = 5,346)

Total 23.3% 19.4% 21.4% 12.8% 22.7% 19.9% 16.0%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not FY)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 17.7% 15.6% 15.6% 10.5% 15.1% 14.9% YES 0.75(n = 385) (n = 353) (n = 442) (n = 399) (n = 431) (n = 2,010)

No 29.0% 24.2% 26.3% 15.0% 30.3% 24.6% NO 1.24(n = 458) (n = 520) (n = 638) (n = 608) (n = 519) (n = 2,743)

Total 23.3% 19.4% 21.4% 12.8% 22.7% 19.9% 19.7%

(n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not FG)


54 | P a g e

Preparation Rates (Student Success Scorecard) The preparation rate data are derived from the completion cohorts in the Student Success Scorecard. The completion cohorts comprise of first time students in the system that earned at least six units (within six years of their first enrollments) and attempted any level of math or English within three years. . If a student’s first attempted English class was below transfer level English (ENGL-120) or first attempted math course was below college level math (MATH-103/110), then the student was considered “unprepared.” Students must have attempted transfer level English and college level math or higher to be considered “prepared” (See Table 379).

Figure 3: Preparation Rate Five-Year Trends


55 | P a g e

Table 95: Preparation Rate Five-Year Trends by Race/Ethnicity

Table 96: Preparation Rate Five-Year Trends by Gender

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

African American 12.8% 10.6% 16.5% 11.3% 9.8% 12.1% YES 0.74(n = 47) (n = 66) (n = 85) (n = 106) (n = 92) (n = 396)

American Indian 0.0% 50.0% 30.8% 15.4% 0.0% 22.9% NO* 1.40(n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 13) (n = 13) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 48)

Asian 22.6% 14.7% 12.1% 16.3% 14.8% 15.7% NO 0.96(n = 31) (n = 34) (n = 33) (n = 49) (n = 88) (n = 235)


Hispanic 11.5% 10.1% 10.7% 12.2% 12.4% 11.5% YES 0.70(n = 209) (n = 248) (n = 289) (n = 343) (n = 364) (n = 1,453)

Pacific Islander 30.8% 12.5% 26.3% 25.0% 18.8% 22.6% NO* 1.38(n = 13) (n = 16) (n = 19) (n = 20) (n = 16) (n = 84)

White 22.2% 21.5% 19.2% 21.1% 14.8% 19.4% NO 1.18(n = 504) (n = 553) (n = 637) (n = 611) (n = 770) (n = 3,075)

Two or more N/A N/A N/A N/A 16.0% 16.0% NO* 0.98(n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 106) (n = 106)

Unknown 12.9% 17.4% 15.5% 17.0% 11.3% 15.6% NO 0.95(n = 155) (n = 144) (n = 168) (n = 264) (n = 53) (n = 784)

Total 18.0% 17.4% 16.3% 17.3% 13.9% 16.4% 15.5%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (White)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 15.2% 18.6% 14.6% 17.4% 12.4% 15.5% NO 0.95(n = 506) (n = 607) (n = 692) (n = 799) (n = 832) (n = 3,436)

Male 21.8% 15.9% 18.4% 17.0% 15.5% 17.5% NO 1.07(n = 454) (n = 492) (n = 570) (n = 610) (n = 658) (n = 2,784)

Total 18.0% 17.4% 16.3% 17.3% 13.9% 16.4% 14.0%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Male)


56 | P a g e

Table 97: Preparation Rate Five-Year Trends by Age

Table 98: Preparation Rate Five-Year Trends by Disability Status

Table 99: Preparation Rate Five-Year Trends by Economically Disadvantaged

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

<20 years 19.2% 18.5% 17.5% 19.3% 17.7% 18.4% NO 1.12(n = 796) (n = 935) (n = 1,052) (n = 1,117) (n = 1,019) (n = 4,919)

20-24 years 21.7% 10.3% 10.1% 18.3% 8.9% 13.1% YES 0.80(n = 60) (n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 109) (n = 146) (n = 482)

25-39 years 12.7% 11.1% 9.9% 4.6% 7.2% 8.2% YES 0.50(n = 71) (n = 45) (n = 71) (n = 109) (n = 180) (n = 476)

40+ years 5.1% 13.0% 11.1% 6.6% 2.4% 6.0% YES 0.37(n = 39) (n = 46) (n = 54) (n = 91) (n = 169) (n = 399)

Total 18.0% 17.4% 16.3% 17.3% 13.9% 16.4% 14.7%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (<20 years)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 3.6% 8.2% 4.1% 5.7% 5.8% 5.5% YES 0.34(n = 55) (n = 61) (n = 73) (n = 88) (n = 86) (n = 363)

No 18.9% 17.9% 17.0% 18.1% 14.4% 17.1% NO 1.04(n = 943) (n = 1,043) (n = 1,193) (n = 1,338) (n = 1,428) (n = 5,945)

Total 18.0% 17.4% 16.3% 17.3% 13.9% 16.4% 13.7%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Not DSPS)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 12.2% 11.8% 10.9% 14.6% 10.4% 12.0% YES 0.73(n = 557) (n = 634) (n = 753) (n = 1,030) (n = 1,195) (n = 4,169)

No 25.4% 24.9% 24.2% 24.5% 27.0% 25.1% NO 1.53(n = 441) (n = 470) (n = 513) (n = 396) (n = 319) (n = 2,139)

Total 18.0% 17.4% 16.3% 17.3% 13.9% 16.4% 19.3%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (No Econ)


57 | P a g e

Table 100: Preparation Rate Five-Year Trends by Veteran Status

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 11.1% 13.9% 13.0% 18.9% 10.0% 13.2% YES 0.80(n = 36) (n = 36) (n = 46) (n = 37) (n = 50) (n = 205)

No 18.3% 17.5% 16.4% 17.3% 14.0% 16.5% NO 1.01(n = 962) (n = 1,068) (n = 1,220) (n = 1,389) (n = 1,464) (n = 6,103)

Total 18.0% 17.4% 16.3% 17.3% 13.9% 16.4% 13.2%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Non Vet)


58 | P a g e

STUDENT SUCCESS MILESTONES

First Year Enrollment Patterns First year enrollments in English, ESL, and math among first-time students consist of the cohort fall term, and the subsequent spring and summer terms, and can completed anywhere in the district.

Table 101: First Year Enrollment of First Time Students, Fall 2010-2014

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

10.6% 9.8% 11.8% 11.6% 13.3% 11.4%(n = 248) (n = 164) (n = 191) (n = 219) (n = 235) (n = 1,057)

Enrolled in Math Only 11.5% 13.5% 10.8% 9.9% 8.8% 10.9%(n = 270) (n = 227) (n = 174) (n = 188) (n = 155) (n = 1,014)

36.5% 36.2% 35.5% 41.6% 40.0% 38.0%(n = 854) (n = 609) (n = 574) (n = 788) (n = 705) (n = 3,530)

41.4% 40.5% 42.0% 36.9% 37.9% 39.8%

(n = 970) (n = 682) (n = 679) (n = 698) (n = 667) (n = 3,696)


Enrolled in English/ESL

Only

Enrolled in Both

English/ESL and Math

Not enrolled in

English/ESL or Math


59 | P a g e

Table 102: First Year Enrollment in Both English/ESL and Math by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2010-2014

Table 103: First Year Enrollment in Both English/ESL and Math by Gender, Fall 2010-2014

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test


American Indian 41.7% 20.0% 0.0% 80.0% 14.3% 31.4% YES* 0.83(n = 12) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 35)

Asian 36.6% 31.3% 33.3% 48.0% 30.8% 36.4% NO 0.96(n = 82) (n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 50) (n = 39) (n = 264)




White 35.2% 32.5% 31.2% 42.4% 39.6% 36.3% NO 0.96(n = 1,083) (n = 727) (n = 629) (n = 760) (n = 755) (n = 3,954)


Total 36.5% 36.2% 35.5% 41.6% 40.0% 38.0% 34.7%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Latino)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 37.9% 37.0% 37.7% 42.7% 42.3% 39.5% NO 1.04(n = 1,173) (n = 787) (n = 782) (n = 889) (n = 856) (n = 4,487)

Male 35.4% 35.5% 33.3% 40.8% 37.8% 36.6% NO 0.96(n = 1,140) (n = 878) (n = 825) (n = 987) (n = 889) (n = 4,719)

Total 36.5% 36.2% 35.5% 41.6% 40.0% 38.0% 31.6%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Female)


60 | P a g e

Table 104: First Year Enrollment in Both English/ESL and Math by Age, Fall 2010-2014

Table 105: First Year Enrollment in Both English/ESL and Math by Disability Status, Fall 2010-2014

Table 106: First Year Enrollment in Both English/ESL and Math by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2010-2014

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 55.1% 53.9% 52.7% 59.3% 60.0% 56.3% NO 1.48(n = 1,218) (n = 981) (n = 986) (n = 1,160) (n = 1,023) (n = 5,368)

20-24 years 16.4% 14.9% 9.6% 16.5% 15.3% 14.7% YES 0.39(n = 385) (n = 268) (n = 270) (n = 291) (n = 300) (n = 1,514)

25-39 years 15.7% 11.1% 8.0% 12.1% 9.6% 11.8% YES 0.31(n = 452) (n = 262) (n = 251) (n = 298) (n = 314) (n = 1,577)

40+ years 17.1% 6.4% 7.2% 11.1% 12.0% 11.8% YES 0.31(n = 287) (n = 171) (n = 111) (n = 144) (n = 125) (n = 838)

Total 36.5% 36.2% 35.5% 41.6% 40.0% 38.0% 45.0%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (< 20 years)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 33.5% 29.8% 42.1% 32.2% 37.9% 35.0% NO 0.92(n = 170) (n = 124) (n = 133) (n = 118) (n = 103) (n = 648)

No 36.7% 36.7% 34.9% 42.3% 40.1% 38.2% NO 1.01(n = 2,172) (n = 1,558) (n = 1,485) (n = 1,775) (n = 1,659) (n = 8,649)

Total 36.5% 36.2% 35.5% 41.6% 40.0% 38.0% 30.6%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 40.3% 38.2% 40.4% 44.8% 44.6% 41.8% NO 1.10(n = 1,283) (n = 1,052) (n = 988) (n = 1,203) (n = 1,143) (n = 5,669)

No 31.8% 32.9% 27.8% 36.1% 31.5% 32.1% NO 0.84(n = 1,059) (n = 630) (n = 630) (n = 690) (n = 619) (n = 3,628)

Total 36.5% 36.2% 35.5% 41.6% 40.0% 38.0% 25.6%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not Econ)


61 | P a g e

Table 107: First Year Enrollment in Both English/ESL and Math by Veteran Status, Fall 2010-2014

Table 108: First Year Enrollment in Both English/ESL and Math by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2010-2014

Table 109: First Year Enrollment in Both English/ESL and Math by 1st Generation, Fall 2010-2014

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 32.7% 34.6% 24.7% 38.5% 23.9% 31.3% NO 0.82(n = 98) (n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 96) (n = 71) (n = 432)

No 36.6% 36.3% 36.1% 41.8% 40.7% 38.3% NO 1.01(n = 2,244) (n = 1,604) (n = 1,529) (n = 1,797) (n = 1,691) (n = 8,865)

Total 36.5% 36.2% 35.5% 41.6% 40.0% 38.0% 30.6%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not Vet)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 38.5% 20.0% 42.9% 0.0% 60.0% 34.3% NO* 0.90(n = 13) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 35)

No 36.5% 36.3% 35.4% 41.7% 40.0% 38.0% NO 1.00(n = 2,329) (n = 1,677) (n = 1,611) (n = 1,888) (n = 1,757) (n = 9,262)

Total 36.5% 36.2% 35.5% 41.6% 40.0% 38.0% 30.4%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not FY)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 25.5% 39.7% 38.8% 42.6% 43.7% 38.9% NO 1.03(n = 435) (n = 556) (n = 544) (n = 673) (n = 615) (n = 2,823)

No 26.7% 36.9% 34.7% 40.0% 38.6% 35.9% NO 0.94(n = 738) (n = 767) (n = 914) (n = 1,036) (n = 1,024) (n = 4,479)

Total 36.5% 36.2% 35.5% 41.6% 40.0% 38.0% 28.7%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not FG)


62 | P a g e

Developmental Sequence Completion Patterns The following tables summarize the enrollment patterns among first-time students that were enrolled in developmental English (ENGL-090 or ENGL-098) or developmental math (MATH-080, MATH-088, or MATH-090) in their first-year at the college, and successfully completed a college level course (ENGL-109/110 or MATH-103/110) or a transfer level course (ENGL-120/124 or MATH-120 or higher) at either college in the same discipline within two years.

Developmental English Sequence, College Level Completion

The following table displays the percentage of first-time students who enrolled in English during their first year (Summer, Fall, Spring, Summer) and successfully completed ENGL-109 or ENGL-110 within two years. These college level English completion rates are broken out by the course level of the students’ first English enrollment. For example, among Fall 2013 first-time students who began their English sequence at ENGL-090, about 48 percent successfully completed college level English within two years. Overall, nearly 70 percent of Fall 2013 first-time students successfully completed college level English within two years.

Table 110: Developmental English Sequence Completion, Fall 2009-2013

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

ENGL-090 36.7% 29.5% 35.0% 31.0% 47.9% 36.4%(n = 90) (n = 88) (n = 60) (n = 84) (n = 96) (n = 418)

ENGL-098 58.4% 52.1% 64.9% 64.1% 58.1% 59.3%(n = 358) (n = 386) (n = 373) (n = 309) (n = 315) (n = 1,741)

ENGL-099 N/A N/A N/A 79.6% 75.0% 76.5%(n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 49) (n = 100) (n = 149)

ENGL-109/110/120/124 75.7% 80.3% 81.4% 87.3% 87.5% 82.2%(n = 247) (n = 284) (n = 167) (n = 158) (n = 287) (n = 1,143)

61.7% 60.0% 66.5% 66.8% 69.5% 64.9%

(n = 695) (n = 758) (n = 600) (n = 600) (n = 798) (n = 3,451)

Annual ENGL-

109/110 or Higher

Success Rate


63 | P a g e

The following tables display the percentages of first-time students who enrolled in a developmental English course (ENGL-090, ENGL-098, ENGL-099) during their first year (Summer, Fall, Spring, Summer) and successfully completed ENGL-109 or ENGL-110 within two years.

Table 111: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2009-2013

Table 112: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Gender, Fall 2009-2013

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test


American Indian N/A 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 37.5% YES* 0.67(n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9)

Asian 71.4% 60.0% 58.3% 85.7% 66.7% 69.2% NO 1.23(n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 12) (n = 14) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 52)

Filipino 42.9% 33.3% 62.5% 88.2% 83.3% 70.0% NO 1.24(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 17) (n = 12) (n = 50)



White 62.0% 48.3% 70.5% 65.9% 66.0% 62.2% NO 1.11(n = 163) (n = 149) (n = 129) (n = 132) (n = 147) (n = 720)


Total 54.0% 47.9% 60.7% 59.5% 59.5% 56.3% 49.8%

(n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (White)

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 65.6% 50.6% 60.7% 65.4% 65.6% 61.4% NO 1.09(n = 224) (n = 259) (n = 214) (n = 228) (n = 250) (n = 1,175)

Male 41.6% 44.5% 60.5% 53.3% 53.5% 50.8% NO 0.90(n = 219) (n = 211) (n = 215) (n = 212) (n = 258) (n = 1,115)

Total 54.0% 47.9% 60.7% 59.5% 59.5% 56.3% 49.1%

(n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Female)


64 | P a g e

Table 113: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Age, Fall 2009-2013

Table 114: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Disability Status, Fall 2009-2013

Table 115: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2009-2013

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 56.0% 49.6% 60.6% 62.3% 60.8% 57.9% NO 1.03(n = 373) (n = 403) (n = 386) (n = 395) (n = 451) (n = 2,008)

20-24 years 52.3% 41.4% 53.6% 35.7% 45.2% 46.3% YES 0.82(n = 44) (n = 29) (n = 28) (n = 28) (n = 31) (n = 160)

25-39 years 32.0% 33.3% 69.2% 31.3% 75.0% 44.0% YES 0.78(n = 25) (n = 30) (n = 13) (n = 16) (n = 16) (n = 100)

40+ years 33.3% 41.7% 83.3% 66.7% 30.8% 45.0% YES* 0.80(n = 1 to 9) (n = 12) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 13) (n = 40)

Total 54.0% 47.9% 60.7% 59.5% 59.5% 56.3% 46.3%

(n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (< 20 years)

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 31.0% 46.8% 38.9% 42.3% 39.1% 40.5% YES 0.72(n = 29) (n = 47) (n = 36) (n = 52) (n = 46) (n = 210)

No 55.6% 48.0% 62.7% 61.8% 61.5% 57.9% NO 1.03(n = 419) (n = 427) (n = 397) (n = 390) (n = 465) (n = 2,098)

Total 54.0% 47.9% 60.7% 59.5% 59.5% 56.3% 46.3%

(n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 54.3% 50.7% 59.3% 58.1% 57.9% 56.2% NO 1.00(n = 247) (n = 296) (n = 297) (n = 313) (n = 378) (n = 1,531)

No 53.7% 43.3% 64.0% 62.8% 63.9% 56.4% NO 1.00(n = 201) (n = 178) (n = 136) (n = 129) (n = 133) (n = 777)

Total 54.0% 47.9% 60.7% 59.5% 59.5% 56.3% 45.1%

(n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not Econ)


65 | P a g e

Table 116: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Veteran Status, Fall 2009-2013

Table 117: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2009-2013

Table 118: Developmental English Sequence Completion by 1st Generation, Fall 2009-2013

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 52.0% 50.0% 66.7% 45.5% 85.7% 58.8% NO 1.04(n = 25) (n = 18) (n = 12) (n = 11) (n = 14) (n = 80)

No 54.1% 47.8% 60.6% 59.9% 58.8% 56.2% NO 1.00(n = 423) (n = 456) (n = 421) (n = 431) (n = 497) (n = 2,228)

Total 54.0% 47.9% 60.7% 59.5% 59.5% 56.3% 45.0%

(n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not Vet)

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test


No 54.1% 48.0% 60.8% 60.1% 59.6% 56.5% NO 1.00(n = 444) (n = 469) (n = 431) (n = 436) (n = 510) (n = 2,290)

Total 54.0% 47.9% 60.7% 59.5% 59.5% 56.3% 45.2%

(n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not FY)

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 45.2% 44.7% 59.8% 59.7% 57.6% 56.4% NO 1.00(n = 42) (n = 85) (n = 174) (n = 186) (n = 217) (n = 704)

No 58.1% 33.9% 61.4% 60.3% 63.1% 57.7% NO 1.02(n = 86) (n = 109) (n = 189) (n = 219) (n = 233) (n = 836)

Total 54.0% 47.9% 60.7% 59.5% 59.5% 56.3% 46.1%

(n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not FG)


66 | P a g e

Developmental English Sequence, Transfer Level Completion

The following table displays the percentage of first-time students who enrolled in English during their first year (Summer, Fall, Spring, Summer) and successfully completed ENGL-120 or ENGL-124 within two years. These transfer level English completion rates are broken out by the course level of the students’ first English enrollment. For example, among Fall 2013 first-time students who began their English sequence at ENGL-090, 25 percent successfully completed transfer level English within two years. Overall, about 52 percent of Fall 2013 first-time students successfully completed transfer level English within two years.

Table 119: Developmental English Sequence Completion, Fall 2009-2013

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

ENGL-090 20.0% 15.9% 18.3% 17.9% 25.0% 19.6%(n = 90) (n = 88) (n = 60) (n = 84) (n = 96) (n = 418)

ENGL-098 37.2% 27.2% 35.9% 40.5% 37.1% 35.3%(n = 358) (n = 386) (n = 373) (n = 309) (n = 315) (n = 1,741)

ENGL-099 N/A N/A N/A 57.1% 60.0% 59.1%(n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 49) (n = 100) (n = 149)

ENGL-109/110 51.2% 55.7% 54.5% 63.9% 60.9% 56.3%(n = 168) (n = 185) (n = 110) (n = 72) (n = 138) (n = 673)

ENGL-120/124 77.2% 83.8% 87.7% 89.5% 85.9% 84.9%(n = 79) (n = 99) (n = 57) (n = 86) (n = 149) (n = 470)

42.9% 40.2% 42.5% 48.5% 51.8% 45.3%

(n = 695) (n = 758) (n = 600) (n = 600) (n = 798) (n = 3,451)

Annual ENGL-

120/124 Success

Rate


67 | P a g e

The following tables display the percentages of first-time students who enrolled in a developmental English course (ENGL-090, ENGL-098, ENGL-099) during their first year (Summer, Fall, Spring, Summer) and successfully completed ENGL-120 or ENGL-124 within two years.

Table 120: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2009-2013

Table 121: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Gender, Fall 2009-2013

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test


American Indian N/A 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 100.0% 25.0% YES* 0.74(n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9)

Asian 0.0% 40.0% 41.7% 78.6% 44.4% 46.2% NO 1.36(n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 12) (n = 14) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 52)

Filipino 14.3% 0.0% 37.5% 64.7% 58.3% 44.0% NO 1.30(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 17) (n = 12) (n = 50)



White 39.9% 26.2% 41.1% 43.9% 43.5% 38.8% NO 1.14(n = 163) (n = 149) (n = 129) (n = 132) (n = 147) (n = 720)


Total 33.7% 25.1% 33.5% 38.0% 39.3% 34.0% 31.0%

(n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (White)

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 43.8% 26.6% 36.0% 44.3% 42.4% 38.4% NO 1.13(n = 224) (n = 259) (n = 214) (n = 228) (n = 250) (n = 1,175)

Male 22.8% 23.2% 31.2% 31.1% 36.0% 29.1% YES 0.86(n = 219) (n = 211) (n = 215) (n = 212) (n = 258) (n = 1,115)

Total 33.7% 25.1% 33.5% 38.0% 39.3% 34.0% 30.7%

(n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Female)


68 | P a g e

Table 122: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Age, Fall 2009-2013

Table 123: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Disability Status, Fall 2009-2013

Table 124: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2009-2013

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 35.4% 26.6% 34.5% 39.5% 40.8% 35.5% NO 1.04(n = 373) (n = 403) (n = 386) (n = 395) (n = 451) (n = 2,008)

20-24 years 25.0% 20.7% 21.4% 28.6% 25.8% 24.4% YES 0.72(n = 44) (n = 29) (n = 28) (n = 28) (n = 31) (n = 160)

25-39 years 24.0% 16.7% 23.1% 18.8% 37.5% 23.0% YES 0.68(n = 25) (n = 30) (n = 13) (n = 16) (n = 16) (n = 100)

40+ years 33.3% 8.3% 50.0% 33.3% 23.1% 25.0% YES* 0.74(n = 1 to 9) (n = 12) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 13) (n = 40)

Total 33.7% 25.1% 33.5% 38.0% 39.3% 34.0% 28.4%

(n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (< 20 years)

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 24.1% 25.5% 25.0% 26.9% 19.6% 24.3% YES 0.71(n = 29) (n = 47) (n = 36) (n = 52) (n = 46) (n = 210)

No 34.4% 25.1% 34.3% 39.5% 41.3% 34.9% NO 1.03(n = 419) (n = 427) (n = 397) (n = 390) (n = 465) (n = 2,098)

Total 33.7% 25.1% 33.5% 38.0% 39.3% 34.0% 28.0%

(n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 35.6% 27.4% 31.0% 37.1% 39.7% 34.4% NO 1.01(n = 247) (n = 296) (n = 297) (n = 313) (n = 378) (n = 1,531)

No 31.3% 21.3% 39.0% 40.3% 38.3% 33.1% NO 0.97(n = 201) (n = 178) (n = 136) (n = 129) (n = 133) (n = 777)

Total 33.7% 25.1% 33.5% 38.0% 39.3% 34.0% 26.5%

(n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not Econ)


69 | P a g e

Table 125: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Veteran Status, Fall 2009-2013

Table 126: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2009-2013

Table 127: Developmental English Sequence Completion by 1st Generation, Fall 2009-2013

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 32.0% 22.2% 25.0% 36.4% 64.3% 35.0% NO 1.03(n = 25) (n = 18) (n = 12) (n = 11) (n = 14) (n = 80)

No 33.8% 25.2% 33.7% 38.1% 38.6% 33.9% NO 1.00(n = 423) (n = 456) (n = 421) (n = 431) (n = 497) (n = 2,228)

Total 33.7% 25.1% 33.5% 38.0% 39.3% 34.0% 27.1%

(n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not Vet)

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test


No 33.8% 25.4% 33.4% 38.5% 39.4% 34.1% NO 1.01(n = 444) (n = 469) (n = 431) (n = 436) (n = 510) (n = 2,290)

Total 33.7% 25.1% 33.5% 38.0% 39.3% 34.0% 27.3%

(n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not FY)

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 19.0% 18.8% 34.5% 35.5% 38.2% 33.1% NO 0.97(n = 42) (n = 85) (n = 174) (n = 186) (n = 217) (n = 704)

No 33.7% 22.9% 33.9% 40.6% 42.5% 36.6% NO 1.08(n = 86) (n = 109) (n = 189) (n = 219) (n = 233) (n = 836)

Total 33.7% 25.1% 33.5% 38.0% 39.3% 34.0% 29.3%

(n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not FG)


70 | P a g e

Developmental Math Sequence, College Level Completion

Table 128: Developmental Math Sequence Completion, Fall 2009-2013

Table 129: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2009-2013

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

MATH-080/88 21.7% 18.0% 15.9% 14.8% 15.2% 17.8%(n = 115) (n = 128) (n = 63) (n = 54) (n = 79) (n = 439)

MATH-090/96/97 34.4% 26.4% 38.9% 33.8% 37.0% 34.4%(n = 195) (n = 193) (n = 221) (n = 219) (n = 281) (n = 1,109)

MATH-103/110 or higher 68.0% 65.5% 74.4% 79.3% 72.4% 71.0%(n = 506) (n = 588) (n = 399) (n = 343) (n = 463) (n = 2,299)

53.4% 50.5% 57.5% 57.5% 54.8% 54.4%

(n = 816) (n = 909) (n = 683) (n = 616) (n = 823) (n = 3,847)

Annual MATH-103/110 or

Higher Success Rate

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test


American Indian N/A 0.0% 0.0% N/A 0.0% 0.0% YES* 0.00(n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9)

Asian 18.2% 14.3% 22.2% 60.0% 66.7% 28.9% NO 0.97(n = 11) (n = 14) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 45)

Filipino 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 100.0% 50.0% 52.9% NO* 1.78(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 17)

Hispanic/Latino 27.3% 16.0% 31.5% 29.1% 27.7% 27.0% NO 0.91(n = 77) (n = 81) (n = 108) (n = 127) (n = 173) (n = 566)

Pacific Islander 50.0% 0.0% N/A 50.0% N/A 33.3% NO* 1.12(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9)

White 35.9% 27.9% 36.2% 33.0% 36.2% 33.5% NO 1.13(n = 145) (n = 165) (n = 105) (n = 94) (n = 141) (n = 650)


Total 29.7% 23.1% 33.8% 30.0% 32.2% 29.7% 26.8%

(n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (White)


71 | P a g e

Table 130: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Gender, Fall 2009-2013

Table 131: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Age, Fall 2009-2013

Table 132: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Disability Status, Fall 2009-2013

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 32.7% 22.9% 37.9% 34.2% 34.0% 32.1% NO 1.08(n = 165) (n = 188) (n = 153) (n = 149) (n = 206) (n = 861)

Male 24.1% 21.1% 27.6% 24.4% 30.1% 25.6% YES 0.86(n = 141) (n = 128) (n = 127) (n = 123) (n = 153) (n = 672)

Total 29.7% 23.1% 33.8% 30.0% 32.2% 29.7% 25.6%

(n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Female)

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 29.1% 13.2% 33.8% 30.6% 32.1% 28.7% YES 0.97(n = 148) (n = 152) (n = 195) (n = 219) (n = 274) (n = 988)

20-24 years 25.0% 27.8% 32.3% 18.2% 26.3% 26.3% YES 0.88(n = 48) (n = 36) (n = 31) (n = 22) (n = 38) (n = 175)

25-39 years 36.1% 31.6% 38.5% 34.8% 48.4% 36.5% NO 1.23(n = 61) (n = 76) (n = 39) (n = 23) (n = 31) (n = 230)

40+ years 28.3% 35.1% 26.3% 33.3% 17.6% 29.7% NO 1.00(n = 53) (n = 57) (n = 19) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 17) (n = 155)

Total 29.7% 23.1% 33.8% 30.0% 32.2% 29.7% 29.2%

(n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (25-39 years)

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 25.0% 25.7% 20.6% 20.7% 16.1% 21.7% YES 0.73(n = 32) (n = 35) (n = 34) (n = 29) (n = 31) (n = 161)

No 30.2% 22.7% 35.6% 31.1% 33.7% 30.6% NO 1.03(n = 278) (n = 286) (n = 250) (n = 244) (n = 329) (n = 1,387)

Total 29.7% 23.1% 33.8% 30.0% 32.2% 29.7% 24.5%

(n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not DSPS)


72 | P a g e

Table 133: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2009-2013

Table 134: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Veteran Status, Fall 2009-2013

Table 135: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2009-2013

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 31.0% 24.1% 31.5% 30.7% 32.7% 29.9% NO 1.01(n = 203) (n = 253) (n = 216) (n = 192) (n = 272) (n = 1,136)

No 27.1% 19.1% 41.2% 28.4% 30.7% 29.1% NO 0.98(n = 107) (n = 68) (n = 68) (n = 81) (n = 88) (n = 412)

Total 29.7% 23.1% 33.8% 30.0% 32.2% 29.7% 23.3%

(n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not Econ)

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 40.7% 41.7% 50.0% 35.3% 65.2% 47.4% NO 1.59(n = 27) (n = 12) (n = 16) (n = 17) (n = 23) (n = 95)

No 28.6% 22.3% 32.8% 29.7% 30.0% 28.6% NO 0.96(n = 283) (n = 309) (n = 268) (n = 256) (n = 337) (n = 1,453)

Total 29.7% 23.1% 33.8% 30.0% 32.2% 29.7% 22.8%

(n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not Vet)

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A 0.0% YES* 0.00(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9)

No 29.8% 23.4% 33.9% 30.3% 32.2% 29.9% NO 1.01(n = 309) (n = 316) (n = 283) (n = 271) (n = 360) (n = 1,539)

Total 29.7% 23.1% 33.8% 30.0% 32.2% 29.7% 23.9%

(n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not FY)


73 | P a g e

Table 136: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by 1st Generation, Fall 2009-2013

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 25.0% 18.2% 35.6% 34.2% 28.7% 30.3% NO 1.02(n = 32) (n = 55) (n = 118) (n = 117) (n = 150) (n = 472)

No 18.8% 16.4% 34.3% 27.0% 36.1% 29.5% NO 0.99(n = 48) (n = 55) (n = 108) (n = 126) (n = 155) (n = 492)

Total 29.7% 23.1% 33.8% 30.0% 32.2% 29.7% 23.6%

(n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not FG)


74 | P a g e

Developmental Math Sequence, Transfer Level Completion

Table 137: Developmental Math Sequence Completion, Fall 2009-2013

Table 138: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2009-2013

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

MATH-080/88 2.6% 0.8% 4.8% 7.4% 3.8% 3.2%(n = 115) (n = 128) (n = 63) (n = 54) (n = 79) (n = 439)

MATH-090/96/97 4.6% 7.8% 16.3% 13.2% 18.1% 12.6%(n = 195) (n = 193) (n = 221) (n = 219) (n = 281) (n = 1,109)

MATH-103/110 17.7% 20.9% 38.4% 38.3% 36.1% 28.5%(n = 249) (n = 268) (n = 172) (n = 141) (n = 216) (n = 1,046)

MATH-120 or higher 65.0% 67.2% 75.8% 80.2% 78.5% 72.6%(n = 257) (n = 320) (n = 227) (n = 202) (n = 247) (n = 1,253)

27.3% 31.6% 40.6% 40.4% 39.6% 35.4%

(n = 816) (n = 909) (n = 683) (n = 616) (n = 823) (n = 3,847)

Annual MATH-120+ Success

Rate

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test


American Indian N/A 0.0% 0.0% N/A 0.0% 0.0% YES* 0.00(n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9)

Asian 0.0% 7.1% 11.1% 60.0% 33.3% 15.6% NO 1.56(n = 11) (n = 14) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 45)

Filipino 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 5.9% YES* 0.59(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 17)

Hispanic/Latino 2.6% 3.7% 13.0% 13.4% 15.0% 11.0% NO 1.10(n = 77) (n = 81) (n = 108) (n = 127) (n = 173) (n = 566)

Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% N/A 0.0% N/A 0.0% YES* 0.00(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9)

White 6.2% 4.8% 16.2% 8.5% 16.3% 10.0% NO 1.01(n = 145) (n = 165) (n = 105) (n = 94) (n = 141) (n = 650)


Total 3.9% 5.0% 13.7% 12.1% 15.0% 9.9% 8.8%

(n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Latino)


75 | P a g e

Table 139: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Gender, Fall 2009-2013

Table 140: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Age, Fall 2009-2013

Table 141: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Disability Status, Fall 2009-2013

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 3.6% 5.3% 18.3% 16.1% 14.6% 11.4% NO 1.14(n = 165) (n = 188) (n = 153) (n = 149) (n = 206) (n = 861)

Male 3.5% 4.7% 7.9% 7.3% 15.7% 8.0% YES 0.81(n = 141) (n = 128) (n = 127) (n = 123) (n = 153) (n = 672)

Total 3.9% 5.0% 13.7% 12.1% 15.0% 9.9% 9.1%

(n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Female)

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 0.7% 3.9% 14.9% 11.9% 15.0% 10.4% NO 1.05(n = 148) (n = 152) (n = 195) (n = 219) (n = 274) (n = 988)

20-24 years 4.2% 11.1% 16.1% 13.6% 13.2% 10.9% NO 1.09(n = 48) (n = 36) (n = 31) (n = 22) (n = 38) (n = 175)

25-39 years 11.5% 2.6% 10.3% 13.0% 22.6% 10.0% NO 1.01(n = 61) (n = 76) (n = 39) (n = 23) (n = 31) (n = 230)

40+ years 3.8% 7.0% 5.3% 11.1% 5.9% 5.8% YES 0.58(n = 53) (n = 57) (n = 19) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 17) (n = 155)

Total 3.9% 5.0% 13.7% 12.1% 15.0% 9.9% 8.3%

(n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (< 20 years)

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 0.0% 5.7% 5.9% 6.9% 12.9% 6.2% YES 0.62(n = 32) (n = 35) (n = 34) (n = 29) (n = 31) (n = 161)

No 4.3% 4.9% 14.8% 12.7% 15.2% 10.4% NO 1.04(n = 278) (n = 286) (n = 250) (n = 244) (n = 329) (n = 1,387)

Total 3.9% 5.0% 13.7% 12.1% 15.0% 9.9% 8.3%

(n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not DSPS)


76 | P a g e

Table 142: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2009-2013

Table 143: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Veteran Status, Fall 2009-2013

Table 144: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2009-2013

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 4.9% 3.6% 12.0% 13.5% 14.3% 9.7% NO 0.97(n = 203) (n = 253) (n = 216) (n = 192) (n = 272) (n = 1,136)

No 1.9% 10.3% 19.1% 8.6% 17.0% 10.7% NO 1.07(n = 107) (n = 68) (n = 68) (n = 81) (n = 88) (n = 412)

Total 3.9% 5.0% 13.7% 12.1% 15.0% 9.9% 8.5%

(n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not Econ)

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 7.4% 25.0% 18.8% 11.8% 43.5% 21.1% NO 2.12(n = 27) (n = 12) (n = 16) (n = 17) (n = 23) (n = 95)

No 3.5% 4.2% 13.4% 12.1% 13.1% 9.2% NO 0.93(n = 283) (n = 309) (n = 268) (n = 256) (n = 337) (n = 1,453)

Total 3.9% 5.0% 13.7% 12.1% 15.0% 9.9% 7.4%

(n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not Vet)

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A 0.0% YES* 0.00(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9)

No 3.9% 5.1% 13.8% 12.2% 15.0% 10.0% NO 1.01(n = 309) (n = 316) (n = 283) (n = 271) (n = 360) (n = 1,539)

Total 3.9% 5.0% 13.7% 12.1% 15.0% 9.9% 8.0%

(n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not FY)


77 | P a g e

Table 145: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by 1st Generation, Fall 2009-2013

Fall

2009

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 2.1% 9.1% 13.9% 10.3% 17.4% 12.4% NO 1.25(n = 48) (n = 55) (n = 108) (n = 126) (n = 155) (n = 492)

No 3.1% 3.6% 16.1% 14.5% 12.0% 12.1% NO 1.21(n = 32) (n = 55) (n = 118) (n = 117) (n = 150) (n = 472)

Total 3.9% 5.0% 13.7% 12.1% 15.0% 9.9% 9.7%

(n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not FG)


78 | P a g e

Remedial Progress Rates (Student Success Scorecard)

Remedial English Progress Rates

The initial cohort of students is comprised of those first-time students whose first attempt in an English course was below transfer level (ENGL-120). The cohort year is based on the academic year of the first attempt. Students with successful outcomes are those students who successfully completed transfer level English (ENGL-120) within six years of their first attempt.

Figure 4: Remedial English Progress Rate Five-Year Trends


79 | P a g e

Table 146: Remedial English Progress Rate Five-Year Trends by Race/Ethnicity

Table 147: Remedial English Progress Rate Five-Year Trends by Gender

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test


American Indian 40.0% 33.3% 30.0% 22.2% 66.7% 34.8% YES* 0.80(n = 15) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 46)

Asian 50.0% 35.7% 40.6% 72.0% 47.1% 48.3% NO 1.11(n = 24) (n = 28) (n = 32) (n = 25) (n = 34) (n = 143)

Filipino 36.0% 46.2% 40.7% 44.4% 46.4% 42.9% NO 0.99(n = 25) (n = 26) (n = 27) (n = 27) (n = 28) (n = 133)

Hispanic 36.1% 44.5% 34.8% 40.1% 45.8% 40.6% NO 0.93(n = 244) (n = 254) (n = 270) (n = 324) (n = 343) (n = 1,435)

Pacific Islander 28.6% 53.8% 37.5% 33.3% 71.4% 46.0% NO* 1.06(n = 14) (n = 13) (n = 16) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 14) (n = 63)

White 43.9% 45.1% 46.6% 46.3% 50.3% 46.5% NO 1.07(n = 474) (n = 443) (n = 498) (n = 508) (n = 485) (n = 2,408)



Total 40.7% 43.0% 41.8% 43.2% 47.8% 43.4% 37.2%

(n = 1,004) (n = 981) (n = 1,083) (n = 1,157) (n = 1,152) (n = 5,377) (White)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 44.0% 47.2% 46.2% 47.4% 53.6% 47.8% NO 1.10(n = 489) (n = 538) (n = 569) (n = 610) (n = 603) (n = 2,809)

Male 36.9% 38.0% 36.9% 38.4% 41.2% 38.3% NO 0.88(n = 488) (n = 439) (n = 512) (n = 541) (n = 539) (n = 2,519)

Total 40.7% 43.0% 41.8% 43.2% 47.8% 43.4% 38.3%

(n = 1,004) (n = 981) (n = 1,083) (n = 1,157) (n = 1,152) (n = 5,377) (Female)


80 | P a g e

Table 148: Remedial English Progress Rate Five-Year Trends by Age

Table 149: Remedial English Progress Rate Five-Year Trends by Disability Status

Table 150: Remedial English Progress Rate Five-Year Trends by Economically Disadvantaged

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

<20 years 46.4% 48.4% 47.6% 47.9% 53.6% 48.9% NO 1.13(n = 666) (n = 655) (n = 685) (n = 793) (n = 746) (n = 3,545)

20-24 years 34.0% 36.5% 33.9% 35.5% 40.1% 36.1% YES 0.83(n = 156) (n = 148) (n = 221) (n = 197) (n = 212) (n = 934)

25-39 years 23.3% 30.5% 32.7% 34.9% 34.4% 31.2% YES 0.72(n = 116) (n = 105) (n = 110) (n = 109) (n = 131) (n = 571)

40+ years 20.5% 26.0% 23.9% 20.7% 33.3% 25.2% YES 0.58(n = 44) (n = 73) (n = 67) (n = 58) (n = 63) (n = 305)

Total 40.7% 43.0% 41.8% 43.2% 47.8% 43.4% 39.1%

(n = 1,004) (n = 981) (n = 1,083) (n = 1,157) (n = 1,152) (n = 5,377) (<20 years)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 36.7% 39.7% 28.0% 27.5% 44.8% 35.1% YES 0.81(n = 79) (n = 73) (n = 75) (n = 102) (n = 87) (n = 416)

No 41.1% 43.3% 42.9% 44.7% 48.1% 44.1% NO 1.02(n = 925) (n = 908) (n = 1,008) (n = 1,055) (n = 1,065) (n = 4,961)

Total 40.7% 43.0% 41.8% 43.2% 47.8% 43.4% 35.3%

(n = 1,004) (n = 981) (n = 1,083) (n = 1,157) (n = 1,152) (n = 5,377) (Not DSPS)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 40.0% 38.9% 39.7% 43.4% 47.1% 42.4% NO 0.98(n = 482) (n = 507) (n = 534) (n = 652) (n = 784) (n = 2,959)

No 41.4% 47.5% 43.9% 43.0% 49.5% 44.7% NO 1.03(n = 522) (n = 474) (n = 549) (n = 505) (n = 368) (n = 2,418)

Total 40.7% 43.0% 41.8% 43.2% 47.8% 43.4% 35.8%

(n = 1,004) (n = 981) (n = 1,083) (n = 1,157) (n = 1,152) (n = 5,377) (No Econ)


81 | P a g e

Table 151: Remedial English Progress Rate Five-Year Trends by Veteran Status

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 30.2% 40.4% 48.9% 38.1% 37.5% 38.8% NO 0.89(n = 53) (n = 52) (n = 47) (n = 42) (n = 56) (n = 250)

No 41.3% 43.2% 41.5% 43.4% 48.4% 43.7% NO 1.01(n = 951) (n = 929) (n = 1,036) (n = 1,115) (n = 1,096) (n = 5,127)

Total 40.7% 43.0% 41.8% 43.2% 47.8% 43.4% 34.9%

(n = 1,004) (n = 981) (n = 1,083) (n = 1,157) (n = 1,152) (n = 5,377) (Non Vet)


82 | P a g e

Remedial Math Progress Rates

The initial cohort of students is comprised of those first-time students whose first attempt in a math course was below college level (MATH-103/110). The cohort year is based on the academic year of the first attempt. Students with successful outcomes are those students who successfully completed college level math (MATH-103/110) within six years of their first attempt.

Figure 5: Remedial Math Progress Rate Five-Year Trends


83 | P a g e

Table 152: Remedial Math Progress Rate Five-Year Trends by Race/Ethnicity

Table 153: Remedial Math Progress Rate Five-Year Trends by Gender

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test


American Indian 20.0% 42.9% 20.0% 25.0% 0.0% 25.8% YES* 0.66(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 31)

Asian 50.0% 60.0% 38.9% 53.8% 52.9% 51.4% NO 1.32(n = 10) (n = 15) (n = 18) (n = 13) (n = 51) (n = 107)

Filipino 8.3% 33.3% 25.0% 40.0% 33.3% 26.8% YES* 0.69(n = 12) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 41)

Hispanic 31.8% 30.0% 26.8% 29.7% 35.2% 30.7% YES 0.79(n = 151) (n = 150) (n = 142) (n = 185) (n = 159) (n = 787)


White 41.9% 39.2% 43.4% 41.9% 53.4% 44.7% NO 1.15(n = 265) (n = 265) (n = 249) (n = 260) (n = 371) (n = 1,410)



Total 36.3% 36.1% 36.2% 36.9% 47.3% 39.0% 35.7%

(n = 578) (n = 571) (n = 575) (n = 643) (n = 742) (n = 3,109) (White)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 36.7% 40.4% 37.6% 43.6% 50.7% 42.3% NO 1.09(n = 338) (n = 332) (n = 338) (n = 374) (n = 448) (n = 1,830)

Male 35.9% 29.6% 34.3% 27.4% 41.5% 33.9% NO 0.87(n = 220) (n = 233) (n = 236) (n = 263) (n = 284) (n = 1,236)

Total 36.3% 36.1% 36.2% 36.9% 47.3% 39.0% 33.9%

(n = 578) (n = 571) (n = 575) (n = 643) (n = 742) (n = 3,109) (Female)


84 | P a g e

Table 154: Remedial Math Progress Rate Five-Year Trends by Age

Table 155: Remedial Math Progress Rate Five-Year Trends by Disability Status

Table 156: Remedial Math Progress Rate Five-Year Trends by Economically Disadvantaged

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

<20 years 35.6% 34.4% 32.4% 31.1% 41.1% 34.7% YES 0.89(n = 261) (n = 253) (n = 247) (n = 267) (n = 219) (n = 1,247)

20-24 years 32.8% 27.7% 35.6% 33.1% 43.2% 34.9% YES 0.90(n = 122) (n = 112) (n = 135) (n = 166) (n = 155) (n = 690)

25-39 years 33.0% 41.9% 39.5% 48.8% 51.5% 44.2% NO 1.13(n = 109) (n = 117) (n = 114) (n = 123) (n = 202) (n = 665)

40+ years 51.4% 43.8% 44.3% 44.8% 54.2% 48.7% NO 1.25(n = 70) (n = 89) (n = 79) (n = 87) (n = 166) (n = 491)

Total 36.3% 36.1% 36.2% 36.9% 47.3% 39.0% 38.9%

(n = 578) (n = 571) (n = 575) (n = 643) (n = 742) (n = 3,109) (40+ years)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 47.1% 49.1% 35.3% 35.3% 43.4% 41.8% NO 1.07(n = 68) (n = 55) (n = 68) (n = 68) (n = 76) (n = 335)

No 34.9% 34.7% 36.3% 37.0% 47.7% 38.6% NO 0.99(n = 510) (n = 516) (n = 507) (n = 575) (n = 666) (n = 2,774)

Total 36.3% 36.1% 36.2% 36.9% 47.3% 39.0% 30.9%

(n = 578) (n = 571) (n = 575) (n = 643) (n = 742) (n = 3,109) (Not DSPS)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 36.4% 37.4% 38.2% 39.3% 48.6% 41.2% NO 1.06(n = 319) (n = 334) (n = 322) (n = 427) (n = 613) (n = 2,015)

No 36.3% 34.2% 33.6% 31.9% 41.1% 34.9% NO 0.90(n = 259) (n = 237) (n = 253) (n = 216) (n = 129) (n = 1,094)

Total 36.3% 36.1% 36.2% 36.9% 47.3% 39.0% 27.9%

(n = 578) (n = 571) (n = 575) (n = 643) (n = 742) (n = 3,109) (No Econ)


85 | P a g e

Table 157: Remedial Math Progress Rate Five-Year Trends by Veteran Status

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 35.9% 39.1% 52.6% 37.5% 50.0% 43.2% NO 1.11(n = 39) (n = 46) (n = 38) (n = 32) (n = 44) (n = 199)

No 36.4% 35.8% 35.0% 36.8% 47.1% 38.7% NO 0.99(n = 539) (n = 525) (n = 537) (n = 611) (n = 698) (n = 2,910)

Total 36.3% 36.1% 36.2% 36.9% 47.3% 39.0% 31.0%

(n = 578) (n = 571) (n = 575) (n = 643) (n = 742) (n = 3,109) (Non Vet)


86 | P a g e

ESL Progress Rates

The initial cohort of students is comprised of those first-time students whose first attempt in an ESL course was below transfer level. The cohort year is based on the academic year of the first attempt. Students with successful outcomes are those students who successfully completed transfer level English (ENGL-120) within six years of their first attempt of an ESL course.

Figure 6: ESL Progress Rate Five-Year Trends


87 | P a g e

Table 158: ESL Progress Rate Five-Year Trends by Race/Ethnicity

Table 159: ESL Progress Rate Five-Year Trends by Gender

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

African American 100.0% 50.0% 33.3% 100.0% 100.0% 70.0% NO* 2.26(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10)

American Indian N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A(n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0)

Asian 28.6% 26.3% 36.8% 27.6% 40.0% 33.1% NO 1.07(n = 14) (n = 19) (n = 19) (n = 29) (n = 40) (n = 121)

Filipino 16.7% 0.0% 33.3% N/A N/A 18.2% YES* 0.59(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 11)

Hispanic 20.3% 16.4% 16.0% 28.9% 36.0% 22.2% YES 0.72(n = 59) (n = 55) (n = 75) (n = 83) (n = 25) (n = 297)

Pacific Islander N/A 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 16.7% N/A N/A(n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9)

White 38.9% 34.6% 24.4% 38.1% 35.8% 34.5% NO 1.11(n = 36) (n = 52) (n = 78) (n = 105) (n = 201) (n = 472)



Total 26.5% 23.7% 25.4% 36.1% 36.8% 31.0% 27.6%

(n = 166) (n = 177) (n = 224) (n = 305) (n = 302) (n = 1,174) (White)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 27.0% 25.0% 30.8% 38.6% 41.5% 33.9% NO 1.09(n = 111) (n = 124) (n = 143) (n = 202) (n = 183) (n = 763)

Male 28.6% 20.8% 16.0% 29.3% 30.9% 25.7% YES 0.83(n = 42) (n = 53) (n = 81) (n = 99) (n = 110) (n = 385)

Total 26.5% 23.7% 25.4% 36.1% 36.8% 31.0% 27.2%

(n = 166) (n = 177) (n = 224) (n = 305) (n = 302) (n = 1,174) (Female)


88 | P a g e

Table 160: ESL Progress Rate Five-Year Trends by Age

Table 161: ESL Progress Rate Five-Year Trends by Disability Status

Table 162: ESL Progress Rate Five-Year Trends by Economically Disadvantaged

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

<20 years 36.4% 42.3% 50.0% 42.4% 61.3% 45.8% NO 1.48(n = 33) (n = 26) (n = 30) (n = 59) (n = 31) (n = 179)

20-24 years 10.0% 20.5% 17.6% 49.2% 42.9% 33.0% YES 1.06(n = 20) (n = 39) (n = 34) (n = 61) (n = 49) (n = 203)

25-39 years 30.8% 21.9% 23.9% 35.6% 30.3% 29.0% YES 0.93(n = 52) (n = 64) (n = 88) (n = 101) (n = 109) (n = 414)

40+ years 24.5% 18.8% 20.8% 22.6% 33.6% 25.4% YES 0.82(n = 49) (n = 48) (n = 72) (n = 84) (n = 113) (n = 366)

Total 26.5% 23.7% 25.4% 36.1% 36.8% 31.0% 36.6%

(n = 166) (n = 177) (n = 224) (n = 305) (n = 302) (n = 1,174) (<20 years)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 42.9% 16.7% 31.3% 57.1% 26.3% 35.5% NO 1.14(n = 7) (n = 6) (n = 16) (n = 14) (n = 19) (n = 62)

No 25.8% 24.0% 25.0% 35.1% 37.5% 30.8% NO 0.99(n = 159) (n = 171) (n = 208) (n = 291) (n = 283) (n = 1,112)

Total 26.5% 23.7% 25.4% 36.1% 36.8% 31.0% 24.6%

(n = 166) (n = 177) (n = 224) (n = 305) (n = 302) (n = 1,174) (Not DSPS)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 31.1% 26.3% 30.2% 38.1% 36.6% 33.8% NO 1.09(n = 132) (n = 133) (n = 169) (n = 257) (n = 295) (n = 986)

No 8.8% 15.9% 10.9% 25.0% 42.9% 16.5% NO 0.53(n = 34) (n = 44) (n = 55) (n = 48) (n = 7) (n = 188)

Total 26.5% 23.7% 25.4% 36.1% 36.8% 31.0% 13.2%

(n = 166) (n = 177) (n = 224) (n = 305) (n = 302) (n = 1,174) (No Econ)


89 | P a g e

Table 163: ESL Progress Rate Five-Year Trends by Veteran Status

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 20.0% YES* 0.65(n = 2) (n = 1) (n = 4) (n = 2) (n = 1) (n = 10)

No 26.8% 23.3% 25.9% 36.3% 36.5% 31.1% NO 1.00(n = 164) (n = 176) (n = 220) (n = 303) (n = 301) (n = 1,164)

Total 26.5% 23.7% 25.4% 36.1% 36.8% 31.0% 24.9%

(n = 166) (n = 177) (n = 224) (n = 305) (n = 302) (n = 1,174) (Non Vet)


90 | P a g e

Course Completion Course completion rates are based on duplicated enrollments. Successful Course Completion Rate = (Grades A, B, C, and P) / (Grades A, B, C, D, F, P, NP, I, W).

Course Success Rates: All Courses

The following charts and tables report the success rates of all credit courses offered in the fall terms at the college.

Figure 7: All Course Success Rates, Fall 2011-2015


91 | P a g e

Table 164: All Course Success Rates by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 165: All Course Success Rates by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

African American/Black 54.4% 56.9% 56.4% 59.8% 60.7% 57.5% YES 0.80(n = 1,183) (n = 1,197) (n = 1,344) (n = 1,195) (n = 1,051) (n = 5,970)

American Indian 68.0% 66.7% 66.0% 67.4% 67.6% 67.1% NO* 0.94(n = 75) (n = 57) (n = 94) (n = 86) (n = 68) (n = 380)

Asian 71.7% 78.2% 72.9% 81.8% 78.3% 76.4% NO 1.07(n = 704) (n = 628) (n = 642) (n = 593) (n = 635) (n = 3,202)

Filipino 72.2% 74.8% 72.2% 73.9% 69.8% 72.6% NO 1.01(n = 417) (n = 457) (n = 468) (n = 476) (n = 484) (n = 2,302)

Hispanic/Latino 66.3% 67.0% 66.1% 66.4% 66.9% 66.5% NO 0.93(n = 5,751) (n = 6,080) (n = 6,930) (n = 6,949) (n = 6,688) (n = 32,398)


White 73.7% 75.7% 76.7% 78.3% 80.0% 76.9% NO 1.07(n = 9,278) (n = 8,844) (n = 9,134) (n = 8,969) (n = 9,690) (n = 45,915)

Two or more 66.1% 71.8% 68.1% 69.7% 70.0% 69.1% NO 0.97(n = 1,527) (n = 1,522) (n = 1,533) (n = 1,496) (n = 1,532) (n = 7,610)

Total 69.7% 71.6% 70.8% 72.3% 73.6% 71.6% 61.5%

(n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (White)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 71.1% 73.3% 72.1% 74.0% 76.0% 73.3% NO 1.02(n = 10,603) (n = 10,304) (n = 10,722) (n = 10,597) (n = 10,940) (n = 53,166)

Male 67.9% 69.6% 69.5% 70.4% 70.6% 69.6% NO 0.97(n = 9,154) (n = 9,042) (n = 9,871) (n = 9,408) (n = 9,342) (n = 46,817)

Total 69.7% 71.6% 70.8% 72.3% 73.6% 71.6% 58.7%

(n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Female)


92 | P a g e

Table 166: All Course Success Rates by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 167: All Course Success Rates by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 168: All Course Success Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 70.9% 71.8% 71.3% 71.9% 73.6% 71.9% NO 1.00(n = 6,393) (n = 5,860) (n = 6,525) (n = 6,264) (n = 6,089) (n = 31,131)

20-24 years 65.7% 68.4% 67.2% 68.0% 68.7% 67.6% NO 0.94(n = 6,095) (n = 6,483) (n = 6,893) (n = 6,623) (n = 6,744) (n = 32,838)

25-39 years 70.0% 72.4% 71.5% 72.7% 75.0% 72.4% NO 1.01(n = 4,428) (n = 4,455) (n = 4,527) (n = 4,604) (n = 4,861) (n = 22,875)

40+ years 74.6% 77.2% 77.7% 83.3% 83.1% 79.1% NO 1.10(n = 3,014) (n = 2,711) (n = 2,777) (n = 2,650) (n = 2,744) (n = 13,896)

Total 69.7% 71.6% 70.8% 72.3% 73.6% 71.6% 63.3%

(n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (40+ years)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 70.5% 68.4% 69.0% 70.2% 71.9% 70.0% NO 0.98(n = 1,786) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,926) (n = 1,816) (n = 1,734) (n = 9,155)

No 69.6% 71.9% 71.0% 72.5% 73.7% 71.8% NO 1.00(n = 18,144) (n = 17,616) (n = 18,796) (n = 18,325) (n = 18,704) (n = 91,585)

Total 69.7% 71.6% 70.8% 72.3% 73.6% 71.6% 57.4%

(n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 67.7% 70.3% 69.4% 71.6% 74.1% 70.7% NO 0.99(n = 13,079) (n = 13,092) (n = 14,271) (n = 14,231) (n = 14,722) (n = 69,395)

No 73.3% 74.1% 74.0% 73.9% 72.3% 73.5% NO 1.03(n = 6,851) (n = 6,417) (n = 6,451) (n = 5,910) (n = 5,716) (n = 31,345)

Total 69.7% 71.6% 70.8% 72.3% 73.6% 71.6% 58.8%

(n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not Econ)


93 | P a g e

Table 169: All Course Success Rates by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 170: All Course Success Rates by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 171: All Course Success Rates by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 74.6% 74.0% 73.0% 73.8% 69.4% 73.1% NO 1.02(n = 1,203) (n = 1,310) (n = 1,250) (n = 1,151) (n = 1,016) (n = 5,930)

No 69.3% 71.4% 70.7% 72.2% 73.8% 71.5% NO 1.00(n = 18,727) (n = 18,199) (n = 19,472) (n = 18,990) (n = 19,422) (n = 94,810)

Total 69.7% 71.6% 70.8% 72.3% 73.6% 71.6% 57.2%

(n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not Vet)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 59.8% 60.0% 38.7% 33.9% 50.0% 49.6% YES* 0.69(n = 82) (n = 85) (n = 75) (n = 59) (n = 80) (n = 381)

No 69.7% 71.6% 71.0% 72.4% 73.7% 71.7% NO 1.00(n = 19,848) (n = 19,424) (n = 20,647) (n = 20,082) (n = 20,358) (n = 100,359)

Total 69.7% 71.6% 70.8% 72.3% 73.6% 71.6% 57.3%

(n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not FY)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 64.1% 68.5% 69.9% 71.1% 74.0% 70.2% NO 0.98(n = 3,732) (n = 4,443) (n = 5,879) (n = 6,457) (n = 7,085) (n = 27,596)

No 68.8% 70.4% 70.3% 71.9% 71.8% 70.8% NO 0.99(n = 5,755) (n = 7,145) (n = 8,968) (n = 9,369) (n = 9,766) (n = 41,003)

Total 69.7% 71.6% 70.8% 72.3% 73.6% 71.6% 56.7%

(n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not FG)


94 | P a g e

Course Success Rates: Transfer Level Courses

The following charts and tables report the success rates of all credit courses that transfer to either CSU or UC offered in the fall terms at the college (NOTE: for math courses, we only included courses at or above MATH-120; for English courses, we included courses at or above ENGL-120).

Figure 8: Transfer Level Course Success Rates, Fall 2011-2015

69.5% 71.0% 68.9%

71.2% 71.8% 70.5%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Five-Year Average

(n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323)


95 | P a g e

Table 172: Transfer Level Course Success Rates by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 173: Transfer Level Course Success Rates by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

African American/Black 56.8% 58.6% 55.4% 60.6% 57.3% 57.7% YES 0.82(n = 708) (n = 693) (n = 828) (n = 786) (n = 694) (n = 3,709)


Asian 72.5% 77.3% 71.3% 81.7% 77.0% 75.9% NO 1.08(n = 418) (n = 365) (n = 404) (n = 388) (n = 453) (n = 2,028)




White 72.5% 74.8% 74.3% 77.3% 78.6% 75.6% NO 1.07(n = 5,530) (n = 5,181) (n = 5,457) (n = 5,471) (n = 6,192) (n = 27,831)

Two or more 66.1% 72.5% 66.5% 67.8% 67.1% 67.9% NO 0.96(n = 961) (n = 907) (n = 936) (n = 980) (n = 1,009) (n = 4,793)

Total 69.5% 71.0% 68.9% 71.2% 71.8% 70.5% 60.7%

(n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Asian)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 71.2% 72.3% 69.7% 72.6% 73.8% 71.9% NO 1.02(n = 6,582) (n = 6,319) (n = 6,811) (n = 6,946) (n = 7,286) (n = 33,944)

Male 67.4% 69.4% 68.1% 69.6% 69.2% 68.8% NO 0.98(n = 5,436) (n = 5,411) (n = 6,041) (n = 5,869) (n = 6,169) (n = 28,926)

Total 69.5% 71.0% 68.9% 71.2% 71.8% 70.5% 57.6%

(n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Female)


96 | P a g e

Table 174: Transfer Level Course Success Rates by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 175: Transfer Level Course Success Rates by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 176: Transfer Level Course Success Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 72.9% 73.4% 71.6% 73.2% 74.0% 73.0% NO 1.04(n = 4,484) (n = 4,047) (n = 4,545) (n = 4,500) (n = 4,437) (n = 22,013)

20-24 years 66.2% 68.5% 66.4% 68.1% 67.6% 67.4% NO 0.96(n = 4,272) (n = 4,500) (n = 5,031) (n = 4,900) (n = 5,093) (n = 23,796)

25-39 years 68.5% 70.4% 66.9% 68.9% 71.8% 69.4% NO 0.98(n = 2,194) (n = 2,243) (n = 2,303) (n = 2,427) (n = 2,762) (n = 11,929)

40+ years 69.9% 73.6% 73.7% 82.5% 80.8% 76.2% NO 1.08(n = 1,167) (n = 1,029) (n = 1,049) (n = 1,078) (n = 1,262) (n = 5,585)

Total 69.5% 71.0% 68.9% 71.2% 71.8% 70.5% 60.9%

(n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (40+ years)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 69.5% 66.5% 67.3% 69.2% 71.3% 68.7% NO 0.98(n = 947) (n = 993) (n = 1,073) (n = 998) (n = 1,018) (n = 5,029)

No 69.5% 71.4% 69.1% 71.4% 71.8% 70.6% NO 1.00(n = 11,170) (n = 10,826) (n = 11,855) (n = 11,907) (n = 12,536) (n = 58,294)

Total 69.5% 71.0% 68.9% 71.2% 71.8% 70.5% 56.5%

(n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 67.1% 69.4% 67.2% 70.5% 72.1% 69.4% NO 0.98(n = 7,775) (n = 7,809) (n = 8,746) (n = 9,038) (n = 9,572) (n = 42,940)

No 73.7% 74.0% 72.5% 72.9% 70.9% 72.8% NO 1.03(n = 4,342) (n = 4,010) (n = 4,182) (n = 3,867) (n = 3,982) (n = 20,383)

Total 69.5% 71.0% 68.9% 71.2% 71.8% 70.5% 58.2%

(n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not Econ)


97 | P a g e

Table 177: Transfer Level Course Success Rates by Veteran Status, 2011-2015

Table 178: Transfer Level Course Success Rates by Foster Youth Status, 2011-2015

Table 179: Transfer Level Course Success Rates by 1st Generation, 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 71.2% 72.7% 71.3% 71.6% 67.8% 71.0% NO 1.01(n = 673) (n = 762) (n = 654) (n = 680) (n = 653) (n = 3,422)

No 69.4% 70.9% 68.8% 71.2% 72.0% 70.5% NO 1.00(n = 11,444) (n = 11,057) (n = 12,274) (n = 12,225) (n = 12,901) (n = 59,901)

Total 69.5% 71.0% 68.9% 71.2% 71.8% 70.5% 56.4%

(n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not Vet)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 58.3% 64.5% 44.8% 28.2% 54.0% 51.7% YES* 0.73(n = 60) (n = 62) (n = 58) (n = 39) (n = 50) (n = 269)

No 69.5% 71.0% 69.0% 71.3% 71.8% 70.6% NO 1.00(n = 12,057) (n = 11,757) (n = 12,870) (n = 12,866) (n = 13,504) (n = 63,054)

Total 69.5% 71.0% 68.9% 71.2% 71.8% 70.5% 56.4%

(n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not FY)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 63.9% 67.5% 66.9% 68.7% 72.4% 68.6% NO 0.97(n = 2,020) (n = 2,469) (n = 3,345) (n = 3,838) (n = 4,397) (n = 16,069)

No 70.0% 71.1% 69.9% 72.0% 70.8% 70.8% NO 1.00(n = 3,620) (n = 4,539) (n = 6,048) (n = 6,487) (n = 7,052) (n = 27,746)

Total 69.5% 71.0% 68.9% 71.2% 71.8% 70.5% 56.7%

(n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not FG)


98 | P a g e

Course Success Rates: Developmental Courses

The following charts and tables report the course success rates of basic skills courses in math, English, and ESL courses (i.e., courses coded at least two levels below transfer). They do not include the outcomes for skills courses (e.g., ENGL-064 or ENGL-090R).

Figure 9: Developmental Course Success Rates, Fall 2011-2015


99 | P a g e

Table 180: Developmental Course Success Rates by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 181: Developmental Course Success Rates by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test



Asian 70.6% 78.5% 74.2% 84.6% 74.4% 75.5% NO 1.02(n = 85) (n = 65) (n = 62) (n = 39) (n = 39) (n = 290)



Pacific Islander 100.0% 80.0% 75.0% 0.0% 100.0% 80.8% NO* 1.09(n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 26)

White 80.9% 76.6% 82.2% 80.9% 83.6% 81.0% NO 1.09(n = 771) (n = 788) (n = 967) (n = 933) (n = 989) (n = 4,448)


Total 74.2% 71.5% 76.8% 72.2% 76.8% 74.4% 64.8%

(n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (White)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 75.4% 75.0% 79.7% 74.5% 82.2% 77.5% NO 1.04(n = 944) (n = 968) (n = 1,116) (n = 1,013) (n = 1,041) (n = 5,082)

Male 72.9% 66.8% 73.2% 69.1% 68.9% 70.3% NO 0.95(n = 722) (n = 745) (n = 923) (n = 773) (n = 731) (n = 3,894)

Total 74.2% 71.5% 76.8% 72.2% 76.8% 74.4% 62.0%

(n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Female)


100 | P a g e

Table 182: Developmental Course Success Rates by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 183: Developmental Course Success Rates by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 184: Developmental Course Success Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 70.5% 68.2% 72.9% 65.4% 71.3% 69.9% NO 0.94(n = 735) (n = 764) (n = 920) (n = 662) (n = 656) (n = 3,737)

20-24 years 63.1% 65.2% 71.1% 62.5% 64.0% 65.3% YES 0.88(n = 236) (n = 339) (n = 343) (n = 357) (n = 303) (n = 1,578)

25-39 years 81.1% 77.2% 84.8% 78.3% 84.0% 81.3% NO 1.09(n = 365) (n = 329) (n = 409) (n = 387) (n = 445) (n = 1,935)

40+ years 82.5% 80.9% 82.6% 86.6% 87.7% 84.2% NO 1.13(n = 348) (n = 303) (n = 379) (n = 388) (n = 383) (n = 1,801)

Total 74.2% 71.5% 76.8% 72.2% 76.8% 74.4% 67.4%

(n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (40+ years)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 72.9% 63.4% 67.0% 62.9% 69.2% 66.8% NO 0.90(n = 218) (n = 284) (n = 264) (n = 251) (n = 211) (n = 1,228)

No 74.4% 73.1% 78.2% 73.7% 77.8% 75.6% NO 1.02(n = 1,466) (n = 1,451) (n = 1,787) (n = 1,543) (n = 1,576) (n = 7,823)

Total 74.2% 71.5% 76.8% 72.2% 76.8% 74.4% 60.5%

(n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 75.5% 71.6% 77.4% 73.1% 79.1% 75.5% NO 1.01(n = 1,372) (n = 1,385) (n = 1,706) (n = 1,556) (n = 1,553) (n = 7,572)

No 68.6% 71.1% 73.6% 66.4% 61.5% 68.9% NO 0.93(n = 312) (n = 350) (n = 345) (n = 238) (n = 234) (n = 1,479)

Total 74.2% 71.5% 76.8% 72.2% 76.8% 74.4% 55.1%

(n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not Econ)


101 | P a g e

Table 185: Developmental Course Success Rates by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 186: Developmental Course Success Rates by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 187: Developmental Course Success Rates by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 71.6% 64.3% 76.5% 59.3% 47.1% 66.5% NO 0.89(n = 67) (n = 70) (n = 85) (n = 54) (n = 34) (n = 310)

No 74.3% 71.8% 76.8% 72.6% 77.4% 74.7% NO 1.00(n = 1,617) (n = 1,665) (n = 1,966) (n = 1,740) (n = 1,753) (n = 8,741)

Total 74.2% 71.5% 76.8% 72.2% 76.8% 74.4% 59.7%

(n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not Vet)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 83.3% 63.6% 33.3% 42.9% 46.2% 55.0% YES* 0.74(n = 1 to 9) (n = 11) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 13) (n = 40)

No 74.2% 71.6% 76.9% 72.3% 77.0% 74.5% NO 1.00(n = 1,678) (n = 1,724) (n = 2,048) (n = 1,787) (n = 1,774) (n = 9,011)

Total 74.2% 71.5% 76.8% 72.2% 76.8% 74.4% 59.6%

(n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not FY)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 71.5% 72.5% 77.2% 73.4% 77.9% 75.0% NO 1.01(n = 466) (n = 582) (n = 854) (n = 823) (n = 849) (n = 3,574)

No 71.7% 68.2% 74.2% 65.3% 69.9% 69.9% NO 0.94(n = 385) (n = 560) (n = 639) (n = 547) (n = 518) (n = 2,649)

Total 74.2% 71.5% 76.8% 72.2% 76.8% 74.4% 55.9%

(n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not FG)


102 | P a g e

Course Success Rates: Career Technical Education (CTE) Courses

The following charts and tables report the course success rates for CTE courses (SAM Codes = Apprenticeship, Advanced Occupational, Clearly Occupational, or Possibly Occupational).

Figure 10: CTE Course Success Rates, Fall 2011-2015

67.5% 70.9% 71.2% 72.5%

74.8% 71.2%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%


(n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333)


103 | P a g e

Table 188: CTE Course Success Rates by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 189: CTE Course Success Rates by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test



Asian 65.5% 77.6% 73.4% 84.1% 80.4% 76.1% NO 1.07(n = 145) (n = 165) (n = 158) (n = 138) (n = 143) (n = 749)




White 72.8% 75.1% 76.4% 76.5% 79.9% 75.9% NO 1.07(n = 2,329) (n = 2,129) (n = 2,056) (n = 1,829) (n = 1,714) (n = 10,057)

Two or more 60.1% 70.4% 63.7% 68.3% 70.3% 66.5% NO 0.93(n = 323) (n = 368) (n = 355) (n = 284) (n = 303) (n = 1,633)

Total 67.5% 70.9% 71.2% 72.5% 74.8% 71.2% 60.7%

(n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (White)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 67.0% 73.0% 72.1% 74.7% 76.9% 72.5% NO 1.02(n = 2,153) (n = 2,002) (n = 1,972) (n = 1,738) (n = 1,779) (n = 9,644)

Male 67.9% 69.0% 70.5% 70.7% 73.1% 70.1% NO 0.98(n = 2,535) (n = 2,411) (n = 2,433) (n = 2,193) (n = 1,967) (n = 11,539)

Total 67.5% 70.9% 71.2% 72.5% 74.8% 71.2% 58.0%

(n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Female)


104 | P a g e

Table 190: CTE Course Success Rates by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 191: CTE Course Success Rates by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 192: CTE Course Success Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 58.3% 61.4% 66.7% 66.2% 71.8% 64.0% NO 0.90(n = 720) (n = 546) (n = 460) (n = 464) (n = 412) (n = 2,602)

20-24 years 63.3% 66.0% 66.5% 67.7% 72.3% 67.0% NO 0.94(n = 1,384) (n = 1,356) (n = 1,351) (n = 1,198) (n = 1,225) (n = 6,514)

25-39 years 68.9% 73.1% 71.4% 73.8% 74.6% 72.3% NO 1.02(n = 1,526) (n = 1,537) (n = 1,589) (n = 1,483) (n = 1,424) (n = 7,559)

40+ years 76.7% 79.3% 79.0% 80.8% 81.4% 79.2% NO 1.11(n = 1,095) (n = 1,010) (n = 1,033) (n = 811) (n = 709) (n = 4,658)

Total 67.5% 70.9% 71.2% 72.5% 74.8% 71.2% 63.4%

(n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (40+ years)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 68.8% 72.9% 74.0% 70.5% 69.0% 71.1% NO 1.00(n = 385) (n = 377) (n = 384) (n = 336) (n = 316) (n = 1,798)

No 67.4% 70.7% 70.9% 72.7% 75.4% 71.2% NO 1.00(n = 4,340) (n = 4,072) (n = 4,049) (n = 3,620) (n = 3,454) (n = 19,535)

Total 67.5% 70.9% 71.2% 72.5% 74.8% 71.2% 57.0%

(n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 64.0% 69.4% 67.3% 69.9% 73.7% 68.7% NO 0.96(n = 2,799) (n = 2,700) (n = 2,721) (n = 2,343) (n = 2,377) (n = 12,940)

No 72.6% 73.2% 77.3% 76.3% 76.8% 75.1% NO 1.05(n = 1,926) (n = 1,749) (n = 1,712) (n = 1,613) (n = 1,393) (n = 8,393)

Total 67.5% 70.9% 71.2% 72.5% 74.8% 71.2% 60.1%

(n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Not Econ)


105 | P a g e

Table 193: CTE Course Success Rates by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 194: CTE Course Success Rates by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 195: CTE Course Success Rates by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 81.9% 77.7% 76.2% 76.6% 72.7% 77.2% NO 1.08(n = 426) (n = 435) (n = 512) (n = 406) (n = 337) (n = 2,116)

No 66.0% 70.2% 70.5% 72.0% 75.0% 70.5% NO 0.99(n = 4,299) (n = 4,014) (n = 3,921) (n = 3,550) (n = 3,433) (n = 19,217)

Total 67.5% 70.9% 71.2% 72.5% 74.8% 71.2% 56.4%

(n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Not Vet)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 58.3% 11.1% 28.6% 50.0% 27.3% 35.6% YES* 0.50(n = 12) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 11) (n = 45)

No 67.5% 71.0% 71.2% 72.5% 75.0% 71.3% NO 1.00(n = 4,713) (n = 4,440) (n = 4,426) (n = 3,950) (n = 3,759) (n = 21,288)

Total 67.5% 70.9% 71.2% 72.5% 74.8% 71.2% 57.0%

(n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Not FY)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 61.0% 66.5% 71.1% 70.9% 73.6% 69.1% NO 0.97(n = 919) (n = 992) (n = 1,172) (n = 1,128) (n = 1,266) (n = 5,477)

No 64.9% 67.6% 69.3% 71.1% 73.7% 69.6% NO 0.98(n = 1,460) (n = 1,617) (n = 1,895) (n = 1,878) (n = 1,813) (n = 8,663)

Total 67.5% 70.9% 71.2% 72.5% 74.8% 71.2% 55.7%

(n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Not FG)


106 | P a g e

Course Success Rates: Distance Education (DE) Courses

The following charts and tables include the course success rates of all courses that were taught 51% or more online.

Figure 11: DE Course Success Rates, Fall 2011-2015


107 | P a g e

Table 196: DE Course Success Rates by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 197: DE Course Success Rates by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test


American Indian 80.0% 60.0% 33.3% 46.2% 60.0% 51.1% YES* 0.82(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 12) (n = 13) (n = 10) (n = 45)

Asian 52.1% 76.0% 60.7% 76.7% 68.5% 66.7% NO 1.07(n = 96) (n = 104) (n = 117) (n = 90) (n = 149) (n = 556)


Hispanic/Latino 53.9% 54.6% 52.1% 53.7% 56.5% 54.2% YES 0.87(n = 707) (n = 756) (n = 931) (n = 936) (n = 1,054) (n = 4,384)

Pacific Islander 45.5% 56.3% 77.3% 43.8% 46.2% 55.1% YES* 0.89(n = 22) (n = 16) (n = 22) (n = 16) (n = 13) (n = 89)

White 66.0% 70.1% 65.7% 69.6% 74.2% 69.4% NO 1.12(n = 1,387) (n = 1,430) (n = 1,441) (n = 1,498) (n = 1,874) (n = 7,630)


Total 58.6% 63.6% 59.0% 62.3% 66.2% 62.2% 55.6%

(n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (White)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 58.4% 64.7% 58.6% 64.6% 68.7% 63.2% NO 1.02(n = 1,776) (n = 1,792) (n = 1,940) (n = 1,891) (n = 2,279) (n = 9,678)

Male 59.1% 61.9% 59.2% 59.2% 62.5% 60.5% NO 0.97(n = 1,086) (n = 1,136) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,262) (n = 1,501) (n = 6,251)

Total 58.6% 63.6% 59.0% 62.3% 66.2% 62.2% 50.6%

(n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Female)


108 | P a g e

Table 198: DE Course Success Rates by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 199: DE Course Success Rates by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 200: DE Course Success Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 56.4% 66.1% 61.1% 66.2% 69.5% 64.4% NO 1.04(n = 447) (n = 454) (n = 509) (n = 580) (n = 685) (n = 2,675)

20-24 years 56.2% 59.4% 54.4% 59.2% 63.5% 58.8% NO 0.95(n = 1,063) (n = 1,074) (n = 1,275) (n = 1,192) (n = 1,465) (n = 6,069)

25-39 years 59.9% 64.6% 61.2% 60.6% 65.3% 62.4% NO 1.00(n = 961) (n = 1,006) (n = 1,077) (n = 1,023) (n = 1,235) (n = 5,302)

40+ years 64.2% 69.5% 65.1% 70.8% 73.1% 68.6% NO 1.10(n = 419) (n = 423) (n = 370) (n = 384) (n = 420) (n = 2,016)

Total 58.6% 63.6% 59.0% 62.3% 66.2% 62.2% 54.9%

(n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (40+ years)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 61.4% 62.4% 60.0% 59.3% 62.4% 61.1% NO 0.98(n = 166) (n = 205) (n = 205) (n = 209) (n = 218) (n = 1,003)

No 58.4% 63.7% 58.9% 62.6% 66.5% 62.2% NO 1.00(n = 2,724) (n = 2,752) (n = 3,026) (n = 2,970) (n = 3,587) (n = 15,059)

Total 58.6% 63.6% 59.0% 62.3% 66.2% 62.2% 49.8%

(n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 55.2% 61.9% 56.3% 61.3% 66.4% 60.6% NO 0.98(n = 1,841) (n = 1,996) (n = 2,224) (n = 2,195) (n = 2,648) (n = 10,904)

No 64.5% 67.2% 64.9% 64.6% 65.8% 65.4% NO 1.05(n = 1,049) (n = 961) (n = 1,007) (n = 984) (n = 1,157) (n = 5,158)

Total 58.6% 63.6% 59.0% 62.3% 66.2% 62.2% 52.3%

(n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not Econ)


109 | P a g e

Table 201: DE Course Success Rates by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 202: DE Course Success Rates by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 203: DE Course Success Rates by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 69.7% 64.6% 59.0% 63.1% 56.9% 62.6% NO 1.01(n = 185) (n = 240) (n = 195) (n = 198) (n = 209) (n = 1,027)

No 57.9% 63.6% 59.0% 62.3% 66.8% 62.1% NO 1.00(n = 2,705) (n = 2,717) (n = 3,036) (n = 2,981) (n = 3,596) (n = 15,035)

Total 58.6% 63.6% 59.0% 62.3% 66.2% 62.2% 49.7%

(n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not Vet)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 64.7% 42.1% 42.9% 25.0% 60.0% 49.3% YES* 0.79(n = 17) (n = 19) (n = 14) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 15) (n = 73)

No 58.6% 63.8% 59.0% 62.4% 66.3% 62.2% NO 1.00(n = 2,873) (n = 2,938) (n = 3,217) (n = 3,171) (n = 3,790) (n = 15,989)

Total 58.6% 63.6% 59.0% 62.3% 66.2% 62.2% 49.8%

(n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not FY)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 56.9% 57.7% 57.1% 61.0% 67.8% 61.5% NO 0.99(n = 441) (n = 527) (n = 784) (n = 916) (n = 1,224) (n = 3,892)

No 55.6% 62.0% 58.0% 62.9% 64.8% 61.4% NO 0.99(n = 840) (n = 1,018) (n = 1,404) (n = 1,504) (n = 1,934) (n = 6,700)

Total 58.6% 63.6% 59.0% 62.3% 66.2% 62.2% 49.1%

(n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not FG)


110 | P a g e

Retention Rates Course retention rates are based on duplicated enrollments. Retention Rate = (Grades A, B, C, D, F, P, NP, I) / (Grades A, B, C, D, F, P, NP, I, W). Basically, the retention rate is the percentage of course enrollments resulting in a grade notation EXCEPT for Withdrawal.

Course Retention Rates: All Courses

The following charts and tables report the retention rates of all credit courses offered in the fall terms at the college.

Figure 12: All Course Retention Rates, Fall 2011-2015


111 | P a g e

Table 204: All Course Retention Rates by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 205: All Course Retention Rates by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

African American/Black 76.2% 79.7% 80.0% 81.0% 81.1% 79.6% NO 0.93(n = 1,183) (n = 1,197) (n = 1,344) (n = 1,195) (n = 1,051) (n = 5,970)


Asian 83.2% 87.6% 86.4% 88.2% 87.4% 86.5% NO 1.01(n = 704) (n = 628) (n = 642) (n = 593) (n = 635) (n = 3,202)




White 84.5% 87.4% 88.0% 88.5% 89.8% 87.7% NO 1.02(n = 9,278) (n = 8,844) (n = 9,134) (n = 8,969) (n = 9,690) (n = 45,915)

Two or more 81.4% 86.6% 84.2% 85.0% 85.2% 84.5% NO 0.99(n = 1,527) (n = 1,522) (n = 1,533) (n = 1,496) (n = 1,532) (n = 7,610)

Total 83.7% 86.0% 86.0% 86.1% 86.8% 85.7% 70.1%

(n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (White)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 83.9% 85.7% 85.9% 86.2% 87.8% 85.9% NO 1.00(n = 10,603) (n = 10,304) (n = 10,722) (n = 10,597) (n = 10,940) (n = 53,166)

Male 83.4% 86.2% 86.1% 86.0% 85.7% 85.5% NO 1.00(n = 9,154) (n = 9,042) (n = 9,871) (n = 9,408) (n = 9,342) (n = 46,817)

Total 83.7% 86.0% 86.0% 86.1% 86.8% 85.7% 68.7%

(n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Female)


112 | P a g e

Table 206: All Course Retention Rates by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 207: All Course Retention Rates by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 208: All Course Retention Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 88.5% 89.1% 90.0% 88.8% 89.2% 89.1% NO 1.04(n = 6,393) (n = 5,860) (n = 6,525) (n = 6,264) (n = 6,089) (n = 31,131)

20-24 years 81.4% 84.1% 83.8% 83.6% 84.1% 83.4% NO 0.97(n = 6,095) (n = 6,483) (n = 6,893) (n = 6,623) (n = 6,744) (n = 32,838)

25-39 years 80.8% 84.3% 83.3% 84.2% 85.9% 83.8% NO 0.98(n = 4,428) (n = 4,455) (n = 4,527) (n = 4,604) (n = 4,861) (n = 22,875)

40+ years 82.3% 86.6% 86.6% 89.3% 90.0% 86.9% NO 1.01(n = 3,014) (n = 2,711) (n = 2,777) (n = 2,650) (n = 2,744) (n = 13,896)

Total 83.7% 86.0% 86.0% 86.1% 86.8% 85.7% 69.5%

(n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (40+ years)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 83.9% 86.6% 86.9% 85.1% 86.6% 85.8% NO 1.00(n = 1,786) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,926) (n = 1,816) (n = 1,734) (n = 9,155)

No 83.7% 85.9% 85.9% 86.2% 86.9% 85.7% NO 1.00(n = 18,144) (n = 17,616) (n = 18,796) (n = 18,325) (n = 18,704) (n = 91,585)

Total 83.7% 86.0% 86.0% 86.1% 86.8% 85.7% 68.6%

(n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 82.1% 85.1% 85.2% 85.4% 86.9% 85.0% NO 0.99(n = 13,079) (n = 13,092) (n = 14,271) (n = 14,231) (n = 14,722) (n = 69,395)

No 86.7% 87.8% 87.8% 87.7% 86.6% 87.4% NO 1.02(n = 6,851) (n = 6,417) (n = 6,451) (n = 5,910) (n = 5,716) (n = 31,345)

Total 83.7% 86.0% 86.0% 86.1% 86.8% 85.7% 69.9%

(n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not Econ)


113 | P a g e

Table 209: All Course Retention Rates by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 210: All Course Retention Rates by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 211: All Course Retention Rates by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 87.7% 88.2% 86.7% 88.2% 84.5% 87.2% NO 1.02(n = 1,203) (n = 1,310) (n = 1,250) (n = 1,151) (n = 1,016) (n = 5,930)

No 83.4% 85.8% 86.0% 86.0% 87.0% 85.6% NO 1.00(n = 18,727) (n = 18,199) (n = 19,472) (n = 18,990) (n = 19,422) (n = 94,810)

Total 83.7% 86.0% 86.0% 86.1% 86.8% 85.7% 68.5%

(n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not Vet)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 75.6% 76.5% 76.0% 72.9% 76.3% 75.6% NO* 0.88(n = 82) (n = 85) (n = 75) (n = 59) (n = 80) (n = 381)

No 83.7% 86.0% 86.0% 86.1% 86.9% 85.8% NO 1.00(n = 19,848) (n = 19,424) (n = 20,647) (n = 20,082) (n = 20,358) (n = 100,359)

Total 83.7% 86.0% 86.0% 86.1% 86.8% 85.7% 68.6%

(n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not FY)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 80.9% 84.7% 86.5% 86.0% 87.0% 85.5% NO 1.00(n = 3,732) (n = 4,443) (n = 5,879) (n = 6,457) (n = 7,085) (n = 27,596)

No 84.6% 86.3% 85.8% 86.3% 86.0% 85.9% NO 1.00(n = 5,755) (n = 7,145) (n = 8,968) (n = 9,369) (n = 9,766) (n = 41,003)

Total 83.7% 86.0% 86.0% 86.1% 86.8% 85.7% 68.7%

(n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not FG)


114 | P a g e

Course Retention Rates: Transfer Level Courses

The following charts and tables report the retention rates of all credit courses that transfer to either CSU or UC offered in the fall terms at the college (NOTE: for math courses, we only included courses at or above MATH-120; for English courses, we included courses at or above ENGL-120).

Figure 13: Transfer Level Course Retention Rates, Fall 2011-2015


115 | P a g e

Table 212: Transfer Level Course Retention Rates by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 213: Transfer Level Course Retention Rates by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

African American/Black 76.8% 82.0% 80.7% 81.3% 79.8% 80.2% NO 0.94(n = 708) (n = 693) (n = 828) (n = 786) (n = 694) (n = 3,709)


Asian 83.3% 87.1% 86.4% 85.8% 86.8% 85.8% NO 1.01(n = 418) (n = 365) (n = 404) (n = 388) (n = 453) (n = 2,028)




White 84.1% 86.5% 86.9% 88.1% 88.8% 86.9% NO 1.02(n = 5,530) (n = 5,181) (n = 5,457) (n = 5,471) (n = 6,192) (n = 27,831)

Two or more 81.7% 87.2% 83.0% 84.1% 83.5% 83.9% NO 0.99(n = 961) (n = 907) (n = 936) (n = 980) (n = 1,009) (n = 4,793)

Total 83.5% 85.6% 85.2% 85.2% 85.8% 85.1% 69.5%

(n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (White)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 84.1% 85.1% 84.7% 85.3% 86.6% 85.2% NO 1.00(n = 6,582) (n = 6,319) (n = 6,811) (n = 6,946) (n = 7,286) (n = 33,944)

Male 82.7% 86.1% 85.8% 85.1% 84.8% 84.9% NO 1.00(n = 5,436) (n = 5,411) (n = 6,041) (n = 5,869) (n = 6,169) (n = 28,926)

Total 83.5% 85.6% 85.2% 85.2% 85.8% 85.1% 68.2%

(n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Female)


116 | P a g e

Table 214: Transfer Level Course Retention Rates by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 215: Transfer Level Course Retention Rates by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 216: Transfer Level Course Retention Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 89.1% 88.8% 89.5% 88.6% 89.5% 89.1% NO 1.05(n = 4,484) (n = 4,047) (n = 4,545) (n = 4,500) (n = 4,437) (n = 22,013)

20-24 years 81.2% 84.4% 83.7% 83.1% 82.9% 83.1% NO 0.98(n = 4,272) (n = 4,500) (n = 5,031) (n = 4,900) (n = 5,093) (n = 23,796)

25-39 years 79.2% 82.4% 80.5% 81.8% 84.0% 81.7% NO 0.96(n = 2,194) (n = 2,243) (n = 2,303) (n = 2,427) (n = 2,762) (n = 11,929)

40+ years 78.5% 85.2% 83.9% 88.2% 89.1% 85.0% NO 1.00(n = 1,167) (n = 1,029) (n = 1,049) (n = 1,078) (n = 1,262) (n = 5,585)

Total 83.5% 85.6% 85.2% 85.2% 85.8% 85.1% 71.3%

(n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (< 20 years)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 83.5% 85.7% 86.7% 84.1% 85.3% 85.1% NO 1.00(n = 947) (n = 993) (n = 1,073) (n = 998) (n = 1,018) (n = 5,029)

No 83.5% 85.6% 85.1% 85.3% 85.9% 85.1% NO 1.00(n = 11,170) (n = 10,826) (n = 11,855) (n = 11,907) (n = 12,536) (n = 58,294)

Total 83.5% 85.6% 85.2% 85.2% 85.8% 85.1% 68.1%

(n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 81.5% 84.7% 84.2% 84.3% 85.8% 84.2% NO 0.99(n = 7,775) (n = 7,809) (n = 8,746) (n = 9,038) (n = 9,572) (n = 42,940)

No 87.0% 87.4% 87.3% 87.3% 85.9% 87.0% NO 1.02(n = 4,342) (n = 4,010) (n = 4,182) (n = 3,867) (n = 3,982) (n = 20,383)

Total 83.5% 85.6% 85.2% 85.2% 85.8% 85.1% 69.6%

(n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not Econ)


117 | P a g e

Table 217: Transfer Level Course Retention Rates by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 218: Transfer Level Course Retention Rates by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 219: Transfer Level Course Retention Rates by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 85.1% 88.1% 86.7% 87.2% 83.3% 86.1% NO 1.01(n = 673) (n = 762) (n = 654) (n = 680) (n = 653) (n = 3,422)

No 83.4% 85.4% 85.1% 85.1% 86.0% 85.0% NO 1.00(n = 11,444) (n = 11,057) (n = 12,274) (n = 12,225) (n = 12,901) (n = 59,901)

Total 83.5% 85.6% 85.2% 85.2% 85.8% 85.1% 68.0%

(n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not Vet)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 73.3% 83.9% 81.0% 66.7% 76.0% 77.0% NO* 0.90(n = 60) (n = 62) (n = 58) (n = 39) (n = 50) (n = 269)

No 83.5% 85.6% 85.2% 85.3% 85.9% 85.1% NO 1.00(n = 12,057) (n = 11,757) (n = 12,870) (n = 12,866) (n = 13,504) (n = 63,054)

Total 83.5% 85.6% 85.2% 85.2% 85.8% 85.1% 68.1%

(n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not FY)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 80.3% 84.4% 85.8% 84.6% 86.4% 84.8% NO 1.00(n = 2,020) (n = 2,469) (n = 3,345) (n = 3,838) (n = 4,397) (n = 16,069)

No 85.5% 86.2% 85.8% 85.8% 85.4% 85.7% NO 1.01(n = 3,620) (n = 4,539) (n = 6,048) (n = 6,487) (n = 7,052) (n = 27,746)

Total 83.5% 85.6% 85.2% 85.2% 85.8% 85.1% 68.6%

(n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not FG)


118 | P a g e

Course Retention Rates: Developmental Courses

The following charts and tables report the course retention rates of basic skills courses in math, English, and ESL courses (i.e., courses coded at least two levels below transfer). They do not include the outcomes for skills courses (e.g., ENGL-049 or ENGL-090R).

Figure 14: Developmental Course Retention Rates, Fall 2011-2015


119 | P a g e

Table 220: Developmental Course Retention Rates by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 221: Developmental Course Retention Rates by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

African American/Black 83.9% 90.7% 87.9% 83.3% 84.4% 86.2% NO 0.95(n = 87) (n = 97) (n = 116) (n = 102) (n = 77) (n = 479)


Asian 91.8% 89.2% 93.5% 97.4% 87.2% 91.7% NO 1.01(n = 85) (n = 65) (n = 62) (n = 39) (n = 39) (n = 290)



Pacific Islander 100.0% 90.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.2% NO* 1.05(n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 26)

White 92.7% 91.9% 94.0% 92.4% 94.9% 93.3% NO 1.02(n = 771) (n = 788) (n = 967) (n = 933) (n = 989) (n = 4,448)


Total 90.7% 89.9% 93.3% 90.2% 91.4% 91.2% 74.6%

(n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (White)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 91.0% 91.4% 94.2% 90.8% 93.4% 92.2% NO 1.01(n = 944) (n = 968) (n = 1,116) (n = 1,013) (n = 1,041) (n = 5,082)

Male 90.6% 87.8% 92.5% 89.4% 88.6% 89.9% NO 0.99(n = 722) (n = 745) (n = 923) (n = 773) (n = 731) (n = 3,894)

Total 90.7% 89.9% 93.3% 90.2% 91.4% 91.2% 73.8%

(n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Female)


120 | P a g e

Table 222: Developmental Course Retention Rates by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 223: Developmental Course Retention Rates by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 224: Developmental Course Retention Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 91.2% 91.6% 94.9% 91.8% 90.5% 92.2% NO 1.01(n = 735) (n = 764) (n = 920) (n = 662) (n = 656) (n = 3,737)

20-24 years 85.2% 85.5% 88.9% 85.7% 88.1% 86.8% NO 0.95(n = 236) (n = 339) (n = 343) (n = 357) (n = 303) (n = 1,578)

25-39 years 90.1% 89.7% 95.1% 89.9% 92.1% 91.5% NO 1.00(n = 365) (n = 329) (n = 409) (n = 387) (n = 445) (n = 1,935)

40+ years 94.3% 90.4% 91.6% 91.8% 94.5% 92.6% NO 1.02(n = 348) (n = 303) (n = 379) (n = 388) (n = 383) (n = 1,801)

Total 90.7% 89.9% 93.3% 90.2% 91.4% 91.2% 74.0%

(n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (40+ years)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 89.0% 88.4% 89.4% 84.5% 91.9% 88.5% NO 0.97(n = 218) (n = 284) (n = 264) (n = 251) (n = 211) (n = 1,228)

No 91.0% 90.1% 93.9% 91.1% 91.3% 91.6% NO 1.00(n = 1,466) (n = 1,451) (n = 1,787) (n = 1,543) (n = 1,576) (n = 7,823)

Total 90.7% 89.9% 93.3% 90.2% 91.4% 91.2% 73.3%

(n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 90.4% 89.0% 93.9% 90.4% 91.9% 91.2% NO 1.00(n = 1,372) (n = 1,385) (n = 1,706) (n = 1,556) (n = 1,553) (n = 7,572)

No 92.3% 93.4% 90.4% 88.7% 88.0% 90.9% NO 1.00(n = 312) (n = 350) (n = 345) (n = 238) (n = 234) (n = 1,479)

Total 90.7% 89.9% 93.3% 90.2% 91.4% 91.2% 72.7%

(n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not Econ)


121 | P a g e

Table 225: Developmental Course Retention Rates by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 226: Developmental Course Retention Rates by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 227: Developmental Course Retention Rates by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 92.5% 88.6% 92.9% 85.2% 91.2% 90.3% NO 0.99(n = 67) (n = 70) (n = 85) (n = 54) (n = 34) (n = 310)

No 90.7% 89.9% 93.3% 90.3% 91.4% 91.2% NO 1.00(n = 1,617) (n = 1,665) (n = 1,966) (n = 1,740) (n = 1,753) (n = 8,741)

Total 90.7% 89.9% 93.3% 90.2% 91.4% 91.2% 73.0%

(n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not Vet)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 83.3% 72.7% 66.7% 85.7% 76.9% 77.5% NO* 0.85(n = 1 to 9) (n = 11) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 13) (n = 40)

No 90.8% 90.0% 93.4% 90.2% 91.5% 91.2% NO 1.00(n = 1,678) (n = 1,724) (n = 2,048) (n = 1,787) (n = 1,774) (n = 9,011)

Total 90.7% 89.9% 93.3% 90.2% 91.4% 91.2% 73.0%

(n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not FY)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 89.9% 88.8% 93.0% 89.9% 90.3% 90.6% NO 0.99(n = 466) (n = 582) (n = 854) (n = 823) (n = 849) (n = 3,574)

No 89.6% 92.9% 92.6% 89.0% 90.0% 91.0% NO 1.00(n = 385) (n = 560) (n = 639) (n = 547) (n = 518) (n = 2,649)

Total 90.7% 89.9% 93.3% 90.2% 91.4% 91.2% 72.8%

(n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not FG)


122 | P a g e

Course Retention Rates: Career Technical Education (CTE) Courses

The following charts and tables report the course retention rates for CTE courses (SAM Codes = Apprenticeship, Advanced Occupational, Clearly Occupational, or Possibly Occupational).

Figure 15: CTE Course Retention Rates, Fall 2011-2015


123 | P a g e

Table 228: CTE Course Retention Rates by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 229: CTE Course Retention Rates by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test



Asian 78.6% 86.1% 85.4% 90.6% 88.1% 85.7% NO 1.02(n = 145) (n = 165) (n = 158) (n = 138) (n = 143) (n = 749)




White 82.9% 86.8% 85.3% 86.1% 88.5% 85.7% NO 1.02(n = 2,329) (n = 2,129) (n = 2,056) (n = 1,829) (n = 1,714) (n = 10,057)


Total 81.5% 84.1% 82.9% 84.4% 86.1% 83.7% 68.6%

(n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (White)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 80.2% 83.5% 82.5% 84.2% 87.7% 83.5% NO 1.00(n = 2,153) (n = 2,002) (n = 1,972) (n = 1,738) (n = 1,779) (n = 9,644)

Male 82.7% 84.6% 83.3% 84.5% 84.6% 83.9% NO 1.00(n = 2,535) (n = 2,411) (n = 2,433) (n = 2,193) (n = 1,967) (n = 11,539)

Total 81.5% 84.1% 82.9% 84.4% 86.1% 83.7% 67.1%

(n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Male)


124 | P a g e

Table 230: CTE Course Retention Rates by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 231: CTE Course Retention Rates by Disability Status, 2011-2015

Table 232: CTE Course Retention Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 79.9% 81.9% 82.2% 82.3% 87.9% 82.4% NO 0.98(n = 720) (n = 546) (n = 460) (n = 464) (n = 412) (n = 2,602)

20-24 years 80.9% 82.4% 80.3% 82.4% 85.0% 82.1% NO 0.98(n = 1,384) (n = 1,356) (n = 1,351) (n = 1,198) (n = 1,225) (n = 6,514)

25-39 years 81.5% 84.8% 82.9% 84.8% 85.5% 83.8% NO 1.00(n = 1,526) (n = 1,537) (n = 1,589) (n = 1,483) (n = 1,424) (n = 7,559)

40+ years 83.6% 86.6% 86.7% 87.8% 88.2% 86.4% NO 1.03(n = 1,095) (n = 1,010) (n = 1,033) (n = 811) (n = 709) (n = 4,658)

Total 81.5% 84.1% 82.9% 84.4% 86.1% 83.7% 69.1%

(n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (40+ years)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 80.5% 87.0% 85.9% 85.4% 82.9% 84.4% NO 1.01(n = 385) (n = 377) (n = 384) (n = 336) (n = 316) (n = 1798)

No 81.6% 83.8% 82.6% 84.3% 86.4% 83.6% NO 1.00(n = 4340) (n = 4072) (n = 4049) (n = 3620) (n = 3454) (n = 19535)

Total 81.5% 84.1% 82.9% 84.4% 86.1% 83.7% 66.9%

(n = 4725) (n = 4449) (n = 4433) (n = 3956) (n = 3770) (n = 21333) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 79.7% 82.8% 79.8% 82.6% 85.2% 81.9% NO 0.98(n = 2,799) (n = 2,700) (n = 2,721) (n = 2,343) (n = 2,377) (n = 12,940)

No 84.2% 86.2% 87.9% 87.0% 87.6% 86.5% NO 1.03(n = 1,926) (n = 1,749) (n = 1,712) (n = 1,613) (n = 1,393) (n = 8,393)

Total 81.5% 84.1% 82.9% 84.4% 86.1% 83.7% 69.2%

(n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Not Econ)


125 | P a g e

Table 233: CTE Course Retention Rates by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 234: CTE Course Retention Rates by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 235: CTE Course Retention Rates by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 90.6% 89.4% 86.3% 88.4% 84.9% 88.0% NO 1.05(n = 426) (n = 435) (n = 512) (n = 406) (n = 337) (n = 2,116)

No 80.6% 83.5% 82.5% 83.9% 86.2% 83.2% NO 0.99(n = 4,299) (n = 4,014) (n = 3,921) (n = 3,550) (n = 3,433) (n = 19,217)

Total 81.5% 84.1% 82.9% 84.4% 86.1% 83.7% 66.6%

(n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Not Vet)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 75.0% 44.4% 28.6% 100.0% 72.7% 64.4% YES* 0.77(n = 12) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 11) (n = 45)

No 81.6% 84.2% 83.0% 84.4% 86.1% 83.7% NO 1.00(n = 4,713) (n = 4,440) (n = 4,426) (n = 3,950) (n = 3,759) (n = 21,288)

Total 81.5% 84.1% 82.9% 84.4% 86.1% 83.7% 67.0%

(n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Not FY)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 78.9% 81.5% 83.6% 84.4% 85.5% 83.0% NO 0.99(n = 919) (n = 992) (n = 1,172) (n = 1,128) (n = 1,266) (n = 5,477)

No 80.3% 82.7% 81.5% 83.7% 85.3% 82.8% NO 0.99(n = 1,460) (n = 1,617) (n = 1,895) (n = 1,878) (n = 1,813) (n = 8,663)

Total 81.5% 84.1% 82.9% 84.4% 86.1% 83.7% 66.2%

(n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Not FG)


126 | P a g e

Course Retention Rates: Distance Education (DE) Courses

The following charts and tables include the course retention rates of all courses that were taught 51% or more online.

Figure 16: DE Course Retention Rates, Fall 2011-2015

75.4% 78.1%

75.6% 77.8%

81.0% 77.7%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%


(n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062)


127 | P a g e

Table 236: DE Course Retention Rates by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 237: DE Course Retention Rates by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test


American Indian 100.0% 80.0% 58.3% 53.8% 80.0% 68.9% NO* 0.89(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 12) (n = 13) (n = 10) (n = 45)

Asian 74.0% 85.6% 76.1% 84.4% 81.2% 80.2% NO 1.03(n = 96) (n = 104) (n = 117) (n = 90) (n = 149) (n = 556)


Hispanic/Latino 73.6% 73.4% 71.6% 73.0% 76.3% 73.7% NO 0.95(n = 707) (n = 756) (n = 931) (n = 936) (n = 1,054) (n = 4,384)


White 78.5% 82.3% 79.9% 81.8% 85.2% 81.8% NO 1.05(n = 1,387) (n = 1,430) (n = 1,441) (n = 1,498) (n = 1,874) (n = 7,630)


Total 75.4% 78.1% 75.6% 77.8% 81.0% 77.7% 65.4%

(n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (White)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 75.2% 78.3% 75.7% 78.4% 83.1% 78.4% NO 1.01(n = 1,776) (n = 1,792) (n = 1,940) (n = 1,891) (n = 2,279) (n = 9,678)

Male 75.7% 77.8% 75.4% 77.0% 77.7% 76.8% NO 0.99(n = 1,086) (n = 1,136) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,262) (n = 1,501) (n = 6,251)

Total 75.4% 78.1% 75.6% 77.8% 81.0% 77.7% 62.7%

(n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Female)


128 | P a g e

Table 238: DE Course Retention Rates by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 239: DE Course Retention Rates by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 240: DE Course Retention Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 78.3% 80.0% 80.7% 81.0% 84.1% 81.1% NO 1.04(n = 447) (n = 454) (n = 509) (n = 580) (n = 685) (n = 2,675)

20-24 years 74.9% 76.4% 74.0% 77.9% 79.5% 76.7% NO 0.99(n = 1,063) (n = 1,074) (n = 1,275) (n = 1,192) (n = 1,465) (n = 6,069)

25-39 years 74.3% 77.2% 74.9% 74.6% 80.5% 76.5% NO 0.98(n = 961) (n = 1,006) (n = 1,077) (n = 1,023) (n = 1,235) (n = 5,302)

40+ years 76.1% 82.5% 75.9% 81.3% 82.4% 79.7% NO 1.03(n = 419) (n = 423) (n = 370) (n = 384) (n = 420) (n = 2,016)

Total 75.4% 78.1% 75.6% 77.8% 81.0% 77.7% 64.9%

(n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (< 20 years)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 75.9% 78.5% 77.1% 78.9% 74.8% 77.1% NO 0.99(n = 166) (n = 205) (n = 205) (n = 209) (n = 218) (n = 1,003)

No 75.4% 78.1% 75.5% 77.7% 81.3% 77.8% NO 1.00(n = 2,724) (n = 2,752) (n = 3,026) (n = 2,970) (n = 3,587) (n = 15,059)

Total 75.4% 78.1% 75.6% 77.8% 81.0% 77.7% 62.2%

(n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 73.6% 76.8% 73.5% 77.1% 81.2% 76.7% NO 0.99(n = 1,841) (n = 1,996) (n = 2,224) (n = 2,195) (n = 2,648) (n = 10,904)

No 78.6% 80.7% 80.2% 79.4% 80.6% 79.9% NO 1.03(n = 1,049) (n = 961) (n = 1,007) (n = 984) (n = 1,157) (n = 5,158)

Total 75.4% 78.1% 75.6% 77.8% 81.0% 77.7% 63.9%

(n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not Econ)


129 | P a g e

Table 241: DE Course Retention Rates by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 242: DE Course Retention Rates by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 243: DE Course Retention Rates by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 81.1% 81.7% 74.4% 80.8% 76.6% 79.0% NO 1.02(n = 185) (n = 240) (n = 195) (n = 198) (n = 209) (n = 1,027)

No 75.0% 77.8% 75.7% 77.6% 81.2% 77.6% NO 1.00(n = 2,705) (n = 2,717) (n = 3,036) (n = 2,981) (n = 3,596) (n = 15,035)

Total 75.4% 78.1% 75.6% 77.8% 81.0% 77.7% 62.1%

(n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not Vet)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 76.5% 73.7% 64.3% 62.5% 73.3% 71.2% NO* 0.92(n = 17) (n = 19) (n = 14) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 15) (n = 73)

No 75.4% 78.1% 75.6% 77.8% 81.0% 77.8% NO 1.00(n = 2,873) (n = 2,938) (n = 3,217) (n = 3,171) (n = 3,790) (n = 15,989)

Total 75.4% 78.1% 75.6% 77.8% 81.0% 77.7% 62.2%

(n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not FY)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 74.4% 73.2% 76.0% 77.3% 82.1% 77.7% NO 1.00(n = 441) (n = 527) (n = 784) (n = 916) (n = 1,224) (n = 3,892)

No 75.1% 76.1% 74.6% 78.9% 79.7% 77.3% NO 0.99(n = 840) (n = 1,018) (n = 1,404) (n = 1,504) (n = 1,934) (n = 6,700)

Total 75.4% 78.1% 75.6% 77.8% 81.0% 77.7% 61.9%

(n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not FG)


130 | P a g e

Persistence Rates (Fall to Spring) Fall to spring persistence is tracked from fall at each college to spring enrollments districtwide.

Persistence Rates (Fall to Spring): All Students

The following charts and tables include all students who were enrolled in the fall term.

Figure 17: Fall to Spring Persistence Rates, Fall 2010-2014


131 | P a g e

Table 244: All Students Fall to Spring Persistence Rates by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2010-2014

Table 245: All Students Fall to Spring Persistence Rates by Gender, Fall 2010-2014

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

African American/Black 62.4% 64.4% 65.2% 62.6% 63.2% 63.5% NO 0.88

(n = 686) (n = 523) (n = 526) (n = 559) (n = 513) (n = 2,807)


Asian 72.3% 73.6% 75.7% 77.1% 74.3% 74.5% NO 1.03(n = 379) (n = 322) (n = 317) (n = 306) (n = 284) (n = 1,608)




White 69.7% 75.5% 75.4% 75.0% 75.2% 74.0% NO 1.02(n = 4,858) (n = 4,200) (n = 4,051) (n = 4,089) (n = 3,981) (n = 21,179)


Total 68.2% 73.7% 73.8% 73.1% 73.1% 72.3% 59.6%

(n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Asian)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 68.7% 74.6% 75.0% 74.3% 74.8% 73.3% NO 1.01(n = 5,588) (n = 4,672) (n = 4,590) (n = 4,727) (n = 4,633) (n = 24,210)

Male 67.6% 72.6% 72.3% 71.9% 71.2% 71.0% NO 0.98(n = 4,564) (n = 4,002) (n = 4,005) (n = 4,215) (n = 4,078) (n = 20,864)

Total 68.2% 73.7% 73.8% 73.1% 73.1% 72.3% 58.6%

(n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Female)


132 | P a g e

Table 246: All Students Fall to Spring Persistence Rates by Age, Fall 2010-2014

Table 247: All Students Fall to Spring Persistence Rates by Disability Status, Fall 2010-2014

Table 248: All Students Fall to Spring Persistence Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2010-2014

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 73.4% 82.6% 83.6% 83.5% 82.5% 80.7% NO 1.12(n = 2,979) (n = 2,353) (n = 2,216) (n = 2,308) (n = 2,219) (n = 12,075)

20-24 years 65.4% 71.7% 72.6% 71.8% 71.7% 70.6% NO 0.98(n = 3,102) (n = 2,746) (n = 2,905) (n = 3,114) (n = 2,994) (n = 14,861)

25-39 years 65.3% 67.5% 68.0% 65.6% 66.0% 66.5% NO 0.92(n = 2,513) (n = 2,184) (n = 2,194) (n = 2,237) (n = 2,298) (n = 11,426)

40+ years 68.7% 72.5% 70.0% 70.8% 72.6% 70.9% NO 0.98(n = 1,645) (n = 1,471) (n = 1,350) (n = 1,337) (n = 1,254) (n = 7,057)

Total 68.2% 73.7% 73.8% 73.1% 73.1% 72.3% 64.5%

(n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (< 20 years)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 76.7% 81.8% 77.6% 79.6% 76.4% 78.4% NO 1.08(n = 774) (n = 729) (n = 820) (n = 818) (n = 779) (n = 3,920)

No 67.5% 73.0% 73.5% 72.5% 72.8% 71.7% NO 0.99(n = 9,465) (n = 8,025) (n = 7,845) (n = 8,178) (n = 7,986) (n = 41,499)

Total 68.2% 73.7% 73.8% 73.1% 73.1% 72.3% 57.4%

(n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 75.7% 77.8% 78.1% 76.3% 77.1% 77.0% NO 1.07

(n = 5,321) (n = 5,341) (n = 5,476) (n = 5,843) (n = 5,792) (n = 27,773)

No 60.1% 67.4% 66.5% 67.4% 65.3% 64.9% NO 0.90

(n = 4,918) (n = 3,413) (n = 3,189) (n = 3,153) (n = 2,973) (n = 17,646)

Total 68.2% 73.7% 73.8% 73.1% 73.1% 72.3% 51.9%

(n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not Econ)


133 | P a g e

Table 249: All Students Fall to Spring Persistence Rates by Veteran Status, Fall 2010-2014

Table 250: All Students Fall to Spring Persistence Rates by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2010-2014

Table 251: All Students Fall to Spring Persistence Rates by 1st Generation, Fall 2010-2014

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 73.4% 74.3% 70.0% 71.3% 69.7% 71.8% NO 0.99

(n = 546) (n = 499) (n = 546) (n = 509) (n = 459) (n = 2,559)

No 67.9% 73.7% 74.1% 73.3% 73.3% 72.3% NO 1.00

(n = 9,693) (n = 8,255) (n = 8,119) (n = 8,487) (n = 8,306) (n = 42,860)

Total 68.2% 73.7% 73.8% 73.1% 73.1% 72.3% 57.8%

(n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not Vet)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 80.0% 71.0% 73.5% 58.1% 50.0% 67.1% NO* 0.93

(n = 35) (n = 31) (n = 34) (n = 31) (n = 30) (n = 161)

No 68.2% 73.7% 73.9% 73.2% 73.2% 72.3% NO 1.00

(n = 10,204) (n = 8,723) (n = 8,631) (n = 8,965) (n = 8,735) (n = 45,258)

Total 68.2% 73.7% 73.8% 73.1% 73.1% 72.3% 57.8%

(n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not FY)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 59.7% 70.7% 70.8% 72.7% 73.9% 70.6% NO 0.98

(n = 1,337) (n = 1,630) (n = 1,924) (n = 2,409) (n = 2,684) (n = 9,984)

No 58.8% 70.5% 71.1% 71.7% 72.0% 69.5% NO 0.96

(n = 2,403) (n = 2,516) (n = 3,102) (n = 3,794) (n = 4,030) (n = 15,845)

Total 68.2% 73.7% 73.8% 73.1% 73.1% 72.3% 55.6%

(n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not FG)


134 | P a g e

Persistence Rates (Fall to Spring): First-Time Students

The following charts and tables include only first-time students to GCCCD who were enrolled in the fall term.

Figure 18: First-Time Students Fall to Spring Persistence Rates, Fall 2010-2014


135 | P a g e

Table 252: First-Time Students Fall to Spring Persistence Rates by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2010-2014

Table 253: First-Time Students Fall to Spring Persistence Rates by Gender, Fall 2010-2014

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

African American/Black 62.3% 60.3% 65.9% 61.4% 59.2% 61.9% NO 0.84

(n = 146) (n = 116) (n = 135) (n = 140) (n = 130) (n = 667)

American Indian 66.7% 80.0% 50.0% 80.0% 57.1% 65.7% NO* 0.89(n = 12) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 35)

Asian 65.9% 70.8% 73.3% 66.0% 69.2% 68.6% NO 0.93(n = 82) (n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 50) (n = 39) (n = 264)




White 74.0% 75.5% 73.3% 78.8% 76.3% 75.5% NO 1.02(n = 1,083) (n = 727) (n = 629) (n = 760) (n = 755) (n = 3,954)


Total 71.4% 75.1% 73.4% 75.6% 74.2% 73.8% 60.4%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (White)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 72.2% 76.4% 76.9% 77.6% 76.5% 75.6% NO 1.02(n = 1,173) (n = 787) (n = 782) (n = 889) (n = 856) (n = 4,487)

Male 70.9% 74.0% 70.2% 74.2% 71.8% 72.2% NO 0.98(n = 1,140) (n = 878) (n = 825) (n = 987) (n = 889) (n = 4,719)

Total 71.4% 75.1% 73.4% 75.6% 74.2% 73.8% 60.5%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Female)


136 | P a g e

Table 254: First-Time Students Fall to Spring Persistence Rates by Age, Fall 2010-2014

Table 255: First-Time Students Fall to Spring Persistence Rates by Disability Status, Fall 2010-2014

Table 256: First-Time Students Fall to Spring Persistence Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2010-2014

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 79.2% 84.5% 84.3% 86.6% 84.0% 83.6% NO 1.13(n = 1,218) (n = 981) (n = 986) (n = 1,160) (n = 1,023) (n = 5,368)

20-24 years 59.0% 64.6% 55.2% 60.1% 61.3% 60.0% YES 0.81(n = 385) (n = 268) (n = 270) (n = 291) (n = 300) (n = 1,514)

25-39 years 64.6% 59.5% 59.8% 56.7% 60.5% 60.7% YES 0.82(n = 452) (n = 262) (n = 251) (n = 298) (n = 314) (n = 1,577)

40+ years 65.9% 62.0% 52.3% 57.6% 59.2% 60.9% YES 0.82(n = 287) (n = 171) (n = 111) (n = 144) (n = 125) (n = 838)

Total 71.4% 75.1% 73.4% 75.6% 74.2% 73.8% 66.9%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (< 20 years)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 82.4% 81.5% 79.7% 82.2% 79.6% 81.2% NO 1.10(n = 170) (n = 124) (n = 133) (n = 118) (n = 103) (n = 648)

No 70.6% 74.6% 72.9% 75.2% 73.8% 73.3% NO 0.99(n = 2,172) (n = 1,558) (n = 1,485) (n = 1,775) (n = 1,659) (n = 8,649)

Total 71.4% 75.1% 73.4% 75.6% 74.2% 73.8% 58.6%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 78.6% 78.6% 79.1% 78.6% 79.9% 79.0% NO 1.07(n = 1,283) (n = 1,052) (n = 988) (n = 1,203) (n = 1,143) (n = 5,669)

No 62.8% 69.4% 64.4% 70.4% 63.7% 65.8% NO 0.89(n = 1,059) (n = 630) (n = 630) (n = 690) (n = 619) (n = 3,628)

Total 71.4% 75.1% 73.4% 75.6% 74.2% 73.8% 52.7%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not Econ)


137 | P a g e

Table 257: First-Time Students Fall to Spring Persistence Rates by Veteran Status, Fall 2010-2014

Table 258: First-Time Students Fall to Spring Persistence Rates by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2010-2014

Table 259: First-Time Students Fall to Spring Persistence Rates by 1st Generation, Fall 2010-2014

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 81.6% 74.4% 74.2% 77.1% 70.4% 75.9% NO 1.03(n = 98) (n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 96) (n = 71) (n = 432)

No 71.0% 75.2% 73.4% 75.6% 74.3% 73.7% NO 1.00(n = 2,244) (n = 1,604) (n = 1,529) (n = 1,797) (n = 1,691) (n = 8,865)

Total 71.4% 75.1% 73.4% 75.6% 74.2% 73.8% 59.0%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not Vet)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 76.9% 40.0% 71.4% 80.0% 80.0% 71.4% NO* 0.97(n = 13) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 35)

No 71.4% 75.3% 73.4% 75.6% 74.2% 73.8% NO 1.00(n = 2,329) (n = 1,677) (n = 1,611) (n = 1,888) (n = 1,757) (n = 9,262)

Total 71.4% 75.1% 73.4% 75.6% 74.2% 73.8% 59.1%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not FY)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 63.4% 74.8% 72.1% 75.6% 73.5% 72.4% NO 0.98(n = 435) (n = 556) (n = 544) (n = 673) (n = 615) (n = 2,823)

No 63.3% 79.0% 75.1% 75.7% 74.3% 73.8% NO 1.00(n = 738) (n = 767) (n = 914) (n = 1,036) (n = 1,024) (n = 4,479)

Total 71.4% 75.1% 73.4% 75.6% 74.2% 73.8% 59.0%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not FG)


138 | P a g e

Persistence Rates (Fall to Fall) Fall to fall persistence is tracked from fall at each college to fall enrollments the following year districtwide.

Persistence Rates (Fall to Fall): All Students

The following charts and tables include all students who were enrolled in the fall term.

Figure 19: All Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates, Fall 2010-2014


139 | P a g e

Table 260: All Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2010-2014

Table 261: All Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates by Gender, Fall 2010-2014

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

African American/Black 39.4% 48.4% 43.0% 44.7% 42.1% 43.3% YES 0.82

(n = 686) (n = 523) (n = 526) (n = 559) (n = 513) (n = 2,807)


Asian 53.3% 52.8% 56.2% 54.9% 56.7% 54.7% NO 1.03(n = 379) (n = 322) (n = 317) (n = 306) (n = 284) (n = 1,608)




White 52.3% 55.9% 54.6% 54.5% 54.7% 54.3% NO 1.03(n = 4,858) (n = 4,200) (n = 4,051) (n = 4,089) (n = 3,981) (n = 21,179)


Total 50.1% 54.6% 54.7% 53.1% 52.9% 53.0% 43.7%

(n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (White)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 51.0% 56.4% 56.5% 53.6% 54.4% 54.2% NO 1.02(n = 5,588) (n = 4,672) (n = 4,590) (n = 4,727) (n = 4,633) (n = 24,210)

Male 48.9% 52.4% 52.6% 52.7% 51.2% 51.5% NO 0.97(n = 4,564) (n = 4,002) (n = 4,005) (n = 4,215) (n = 4,078) (n = 20,864)

Total 50.1% 54.6% 54.7% 53.1% 52.9% 53.0% 43.4%

(n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Female)


140 | P a g e

Table 262: All Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates by Age, Fall 2010-2014

Table 263: All Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates by Disability Status, Fall 2010-2014

Table 264: All Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2010-2014

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 58.5% 66.3% 69.0% 68.3% 65.8% 65.2% NO 1.23(n = 2,979) (n = 2,353) (n = 2,216) (n = 2,308) (n = 2,219) (n = 12,075)

20-24 years 44.6% 50.1% 51.2% 48.5% 49.4% 48.7% YES 0.92(n = 3,102) (n = 2,746) (n = 2,905) (n = 3,114) (n = 2,994) (n = 14,861)

25-39 years 45.8% 46.9% 45.9% 45.6% 44.9% 45.8% YES 0.86(n = 2,513) (n = 2,184) (n = 2,194) (n = 2,237) (n = 2,298) (n = 11,426)

40+ years 51.7% 55.5% 52.7% 50.6% 53.2% 52.7% NO 1.00(n = 1,645) (n = 1,471) (n = 1,350) (n = 1,337) (n = 1,254) (n = 7,057)

Total 50.1% 54.6% 54.7% 53.1% 52.9% 53.0% 52.1%

(n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (< 20 years)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 60.2% 65.8% 62.4% 58.7% 57.6% 60.9% NO 1.15(n = 774) (n = 729) (n = 820) (n = 818) (n = 779) (n = 3,920)

No 49.3% 53.6% 53.9% 52.6% 52.4% 52.2% NO 0.99(n = 9,465) (n = 8,025) (n = 7,845) (n = 8,178) (n = 7,986) (n = 41,499)

Total 50.1% 54.6% 54.7% 53.1% 52.9% 53.0% 41.8%

(n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 55.5% 58.7% 57.6% 54.6% 56.5% 56.6% NO 1.07(n = 5,321) (n = 5,341) (n = 5,476) (n = 5,843) (n = 5,792) (n = 27,773)

No 44.3% 48.1% 49.6% 50.4% 45.9% 47.3% NO 0.89(n = 4,918) (n = 3,413) (n = 3,189) (n = 3,153) (n = 2,973) (n = 17,646)

Total 50.1% 54.6% 54.7% 53.1% 52.9% 53.0% 37.9%

(n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not Econ)


141 | P a g e

Table 265: All Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates by Veteran Status, Fall 2010-2014

Table 266: All Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2010-2014

Table 267: All Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates by 1st Generation, Fall 2010-2014

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 49.3% 52.5% 45.2% 46.4% 44.4% 47.6% NO 0.90(n = 546) (n = 499) (n = 546) (n = 509) (n = 459) (n = 2,559)

No 50.1% 54.7% 55.3% 53.6% 53.4% 53.3% NO 1.01(n = 9,693) (n = 8,255) (n = 8,119) (n = 8,487) (n = 8,306) (n = 42,860)

Total 50.1% 54.6% 54.7% 53.1% 52.9% 53.0% 42.6%

(n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not Vet)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 42.9% 64.5% 47.1% 48.4% 33.3% 47.2% NO* 0.89(n = 35) (n = 31) (n = 34) (n = 31) (n = 30) (n = 161)

No 50.1% 54.5% 54.7% 53.2% 53.0% 53.0% NO 1.00(n = 10,204) (n = 8,723) (n = 8,631) (n = 8,965) (n = 8,735) (n = 45,258)

Total 50.1% 54.6% 54.7% 53.1% 52.9% 53.0% 42.4%

(n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not FY)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 39.5% 52.9% 54.4% 53.9% 55.2% 52.3% NO 0.99(n = 1,337) (n = 1,630) (n = 1,924) (n = 2,409) (n = 2,684) (n = 9,984)

No 39.6% 51.4% 53.2% 52.8% 52.0% 50.4% NO 0.95(n = 2,403) (n = 2,516) (n = 3,102) (n = 3,794) (n = 4,030) (n = 15,845)

Total 50.1% 54.6% 54.7% 53.1% 52.9% 53.0% 40.4%

(n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not FG)


142 | P a g e

Persistence Rates (Fall to Fall): First-Time Students

The following charts and tables include only first-time students to GCCCD who were enrolled in the fall term.

Figure 20: First-Time Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates, Fall 2010-2014


143 | P a g e

Table 268: First-Time Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2010-2014

Table 269: First-Time Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates by Gender, Fall 2010-2014

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test


(n = 146) (n = 116) (n = 135) (n = 140) (n = 130) (n = 667)


Asian 56.1% 45.8% 60.0% 58.0% 66.7% 56.8% NO 1.03(n = 82) (n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 50) (n = 39) (n = 264)




White 56.6% 58.3% 56.4% 62.6% 57.9% 58.3% NO 1.05(n = 1,083) (n = 727) (n = 629) (n = 760) (n = 755) (n = 3,954)


Total 52.0% 55.9% 55.5% 59.0% 54.9% 55.3% 46.6%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (White)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 54.9% 58.2% 58.7% 60.7% 56.3% 57.6% NO 1.04(n = 1,173) (n = 787) (n = 782) (n = 889) (n = 856) (n = 4,487)

Male 49.2% 53.6% 52.8% 57.6% 53.4% 53.2% NO 0.96(n = 1,140) (n = 878) (n = 825) (n = 987) (n = 889) (n = 4,719)

Total 52.0% 55.9% 55.5% 59.0% 54.9% 55.3% 46.1%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Female)


144 | P a g e

Table 270: First-Time Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates by Age, Fall 2010-2014

Table 271: First-Time Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates by Disability Status Fall 2010-2014

Table 272: First-Time Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2010-2014

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 60.7% 66.5% 69.7% 69.9% 68.0% 66.8% NO 1.21(n = 1,218) (n = 981) (n = 986) (n = 1,160) (n = 1,023) (n = 5,368)

20-24 years 34.0% 38.8% 30.0% 43.0% 38.7% 36.8% YES 0.67(n = 385) (n = 268) (n = 270) (n = 291) (n = 300) (n = 1,514)

25-39 years 45.1% 42.4% 34.7% 41.6% 34.1% 40.1% YES 0.73(n = 452) (n = 262) (n = 251) (n = 298) (n = 314) (n = 1,577)

40+ years 50.2% 43.3% 38.7% 39.6% 39.2% 43.8% YES 0.79(n = 287) (n = 171) (n = 111) (n = 144) (n = 125) (n = 838)

Total 52.0% 55.9% 55.5% 59.0% 54.9% 55.3% 53.4%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (< 20 years)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 64.7% 65.3% 66.2% 60.2% 63.1% 64.0% NO 1.16(n = 170) (n = 124) (n = 133) (n = 118) (n = 103) (n = 648)

No 51.0% 55.2% 54.5% 58.9% 54.4% 54.7% NO 0.99(n = 2,172) (n = 1,558) (n = 1,485) (n = 1,775) (n = 1,659) (n = 8,649)

Total 52.0% 55.9% 55.5% 59.0% 54.9% 55.3% 43.7%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 55.6% 58.6% 59.7% 59.3% 58.5% 58.2% NO 1.05(n = 1,283) (n = 1,052) (n = 988) (n = 1,203) (n = 1,143) (n = 5,669)

No 47.7% 51.6% 48.9% 58.6% 48.3% 50.7% NO 0.92(n = 1,059) (n = 630) (n = 630) (n = 690) (n = 619) (n = 3,628)

Total 52.0% 55.9% 55.5% 59.0% 54.9% 55.3% 40.6%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not Econ)


145 | P a g e

Table 273: First-Time Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates by Veteran Status, Fall 2010-2014

Table 274: First-Time Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2010-2014

Table 275: First-Time Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates by 1st Generation, Fall 2010-2014

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 59.2% 59.0% 39.3% 58.3% 45.1% 52.5% NO 0.95(n = 98) (n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 96) (n = 71) (n = 432)

No 51.7% 55.8% 56.4% 59.0% 55.4% 55.4% NO 1.00(n = 2,244) (n = 1,604) (n = 1,529) (n = 1,797) (n = 1,691) (n = 8,865)

Total 52.0% 55.9% 55.5% 59.0% 54.9% 55.3% 44.4%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not Vet)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 23.1% 40.0% 28.6% 60.0% 40.0% 34.3% YES* 0.62(n = 13) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 35)

No 52.2% 56.0% 55.6% 59.0% 55.0% 55.4% NO 1.00(n = 2,329) (n = 1,677) (n = 1,611) (n = 1,888) (n = 1,757) (n = 9,262)

Total 52.0% 55.9% 55.5% 59.0% 54.9% 55.3% 44.3%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not FY)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 38.9% 57.4% 53.7% 57.4% 50.9% 52.4% NO 0.95(n = 435) (n = 556) (n = 544) (n = 673) (n = 615) (n = 2,823)

No 43.9% 59.3% 57.2% 59.7% 56.7% 55.9% NO 1.01(n = 738) (n = 767) (n = 914) (n = 1,036) (n = 1,024) (n = 4,479)

Total 52.0% 55.9% 55.5% 59.0% 54.9% 55.3% 44.7%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not FG)


146 | P a g e

Persistence Rates (Student Success Scorecard) The persistence rate data are derived from the completion cohorts in the Student Success Scorecard. The completion cohorts comprise of first time students in the system that earned at least six units (within six years of their first enrollments) and attempted any level of math or English within three years. Successful persistence includes students who attempted a credit course OR completed a degree or certificate or transferred to a four-year institution within the first three consecutive major terms.

Figure 21: Persistence Rate Five-Year Trends


147 | P a g e

Table 276: Persistence Rate Five-Year Trends by Race/Ethnicity

Table 277: Persistence Rate Five-Year Trends by Gender

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

African American 61.7% 71.2% 54.1% 68.9% 65.2% 64.4% NO 0.92(n = 47) (n = 66) (n = 85) (n = 106) (n = 92) (n = 396)


Asian 77.4% 79.4% 69.7% 85.7% 77.3% 78.3% NO 1.12(n = 31) (n = 34) (n = 33) (n = 49) (n = 88) (n = 235)




White 72.2% 73.1% 65.9% 70.2% 75.1% 71.4% NO 1.02(n = 504) (n = 553) (n = 637) (n = 611) (n = 770) (n = 3,075)



Total 73.7% 71.9% 64.6% 69.4% 71.9% 70.1% 57.1%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (White)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 73.3% 72.2% 64.7% 69.6% 73.3% 70.5% NO 1.01(n = 506) (n = 607) (n = 692) (n = 799) (n = 832) (n = 3,436)

Male 74.0% 71.7% 64.6% 69.5% 70.1% 69.8% NO 0.99(n = 454) (n = 492) (n = 570) (n = 610) (n = 658) (n = 2,784)

Total 73.7% 71.9% 64.6% 69.4% 71.9% 70.1% 56.4%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Female)


148 | P a g e

Table 278: Persistence Rate Five-Year Trends by Age

Table 279: Persistence Rate Five-Year Trends by Disability Status

Table 280: Persistence Rate Five-Year Trends by Economically Disadvantaged

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

<20 years 75.5% 72.9% 62.3% 66.2% 65.3% 68.0% NO 0.97(n = 796) (n = 935) (n = 1,052) (n = 1,117) (n = 1,019) (n = 4,919)

20-24 years 60.0% 61.5% 65.2% 73.4% 78.1% 69.7% NO 0.99(n = 60) (n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 109) (n = 146) (n = 482)

25-39 years 57.7% 66.7% 81.7% 85.3% 87.8% 79.8% NO 1.14(n = 71) (n = 45) (n = 71) (n = 109) (n = 180) (n = 476)

40+ years 82.1% 73.9% 87.0% 83.5% 89.3% 85.2% NO 1.21(n = 39) (n = 46) (n = 54) (n = 91) (n = 169) (n = 399)

Total 73.7% 71.9% 64.6% 69.4% 71.9% 70.1% 54.4%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (<20 years)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 76.4% 72.1% 72.6% 71.6% 79.1% 74.4% NO 1.06(n = 55) (n = 61) (n = 73) (n = 88) (n = 86) (n = 363)

No 73.6% 71.9% 64.1% 69.2% 71.4% 69.9% NO 1.00(n = 943) (n = 1,043) (n = 1,193) (n = 1,338) (n = 1,428) (n = 5,945)

Total 73.7% 71.9% 64.6% 69.4% 71.9% 70.1% 55.9%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Not DSPS)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 75.2% 72.1% 65.9% 71.3% 75.9% 72.3% NO 1.03(n = 557) (n = 634) (n = 753) (n = 1,030) (n = 1,195) (n = 4,169)

No 71.9% 71.7% 62.8% 64.4% 56.7% 66.0% NO 0.94(n = 441) (n = 470) (n = 513) (n = 396) (n = 319) (n = 2,139)

Total 73.7% 71.9% 64.6% 69.4% 71.9% 70.1% 52.8%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (No Econ)


149 | P a g e

Table 281: Persistence Rate Five-Year Trends by Veteran Status

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 75.0% 75.0% 67.4% 67.6% 78.0% 72.7% NO 1.04(n = 36) (n = 36) (n = 46) (n = 37) (n = 50) (n = 205)

No 73.7% 71.8% 64.5% 69.4% 71.7% 70.1% NO 1.00(n = 962) (n = 1,068) (n = 1,220) (n = 1,389) (n = 1,464) (n = 6,103)

Total 73.7% 71.9% 64.6% 69.4% 71.9% 70.1% 56.1%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Non Vet)


150 | P a g e

Units Attempted Categories of units attempted represent units attempted districtwide, and the average units attempted provide a breakdown of units attempted districtwide and at each college. Units attempted are counted for any course in which a grade notation was received (grades A, B, C, D, F, P, NP, I, W).

Units Attempted: All Students

The following tables include all students enrolled in the fall term.

Table 282: All Students Units Attempted, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

0.1 - 2.9 Units 5.9% 4.8% 3.0% 2.8% 1.8% 3.6%(n = 520) (n = 412) (n = 270) (n = 244) (n = 168) (n = 1,614)

3.0 - 5.9 Units 17.5% 18.4% 17.5% 18.2% 18.6% 18.0%(n = 1,534) (n = 1,596) (n = 1,570) (n = 1,597) (n = 1,702) (n = 7,999)

6.0 - 8.9 Units 19.2% 19.3% 19.2% 19.3% 18.7% 19.1%(n = 1,680) (n = 1,676) (n = 1,726) (n = 1,695) (n = 1,710) (n = 8,487)

9.0 - 11.9 Units 17.4% 17.5% 18.4% 18.1% 18.2% 17.9%(n = 1,527) (n = 1,515) (n = 1,655) (n = 1,586) (n = 1,663) (n = 7,946)

12.0+ Units 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.7% 41.2%

(n = 3,493) (n = 3,466) (n = 3,775) (n = 3,643) (n = 3,902) (n = 18,279)

All Students Cohort (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325)

Avg. Units GCCCD 9.11 9.15 9.49 9.40 9.54 9.34

Avg. Units CC 7.02 7.04 7.44 7.46 7.45 7.28

Avg. Units GC 2.09 2.11 2.05 1.94 2.09 2.06


151 | P a g e

Table 283: All Students Units Attempted by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 284: All Students Units Attempted by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test


American Indian 30.3% 27.3% 29.5% 42.1% 20.5% 29.9% YES* 0.73(n = 33) (n = 33) (n = 44) (n = 38) (n = 39) (n = 187)

Asian 43.8% 39.1% 47.4% 44.0% 48.6% 44.5% NO 1.08(n = 322) (n = 317) (n = 306) (n = 284) (n = 292) (n = 1,521)




White 38.5% 38.3% 41.1% 41.5% 45.5% 41.0% NO 0.99(n = 4,200) (n = 4,051) (n = 4,089) (n = 3,981) (n = 4,264) (n = 20,585)


Total 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.7% 41.2% 35.6%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Asian)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 39.2% 39.1% 40.7% 41.8% 42.3% 40.6% NO 0.99(n = 4,672) (n = 4,590) (n = 4,727) (n = 4,633) (n = 4,933) (n = 23,555)

Male 40.7% 41.0% 43.3% 41.2% 43.2% 41.9% NO 1.02(n = 4,002) (n = 4,005) (n = 4,215) (n = 4,078) (n = 4,130) (n = 20,430)

Total 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.7% 41.2% 33.5%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Male)


152 | P a g e

Table 285: All Students Units Attempted by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 286: All Students Units Attempted by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 287: All Students Units Attempted by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 59.5% 57.7% 62.9% 62.1% 58.9% 60.2% NO 1.46(n = 2,353) (n = 2,216) (n = 2,308) (n = 2,219) (n = 2,386) (n = 11,482)

20-24 years 41.0% 42.5% 43.2% 41.4% 44.0% 42.5% YES 1.03(n = 2,746) (n = 2,905) (n = 3,114) (n = 2,994) (n = 3,053) (n = 14,812)

25-39 years 27.8% 27.8% 27.3% 29.5% 30.4% 28.6% YES 0.69(n = 2,184) (n = 2,194) (n = 2,237) (n = 2,298) (n = 2,418) (n = 11,331)

40+ years 24.5% 25.3% 27.5% 27.8% 32.4% 27.4% YES 0.66(n = 1,471) (n = 1,350) (n = 1,337) (n = 1,254) (n = 1,288) (n = 6,700)

Total 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.7% 41.2% 48.2%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (< 20 years)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 37.2% 38.3% 37.4% 33.0% 36.4% 36.5% NO 0.88(n = 729) (n = 820) (n = 818) (n = 779) (n = 748) (n = 3,894)

No 40.1% 40.2% 42.4% 42.4% 43.2% 41.7% NO 1.01(n = 8,025) (n = 7,845) (n = 8,178) (n = 7,986) (n = 8,397) (n = 40,431)

Total 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.7% 41.2% 33.4%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 45.4% 45.0% 47.4% 48.2% 50.0% 47.3% NO 1.15(n = 5,341) (n = 5,476) (n = 5,843) (n = 5,792) (n = 6,032) (n = 28,484)

No 31.2% 31.5% 31.9% 28.7% 28.5% 30.4% NO 0.74(n = 3,413) (n = 3,189) (n = 3,153) (n = 2,973) (n = 3,113) (n = 15,841)

Total 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.7% 41.2% 24.3%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not Econ)


153 | P a g e

Table 288: All Students Units Attempted by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 289: All Students Units Attempted by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 290: All Students Units Attempted by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 52.7% 54.8% 50.9% 53.6% 51.8% 52.8% NO 1.28(n = 499) (n = 546) (n = 509) (n = 459) (n = 434) (n = 2,447)

No 39.1% 39.0% 41.4% 40.9% 42.2% 40.6% NO 0.98(n = 8,255) (n = 8,119) (n = 8,487) (n = 8,306) (n = 8,711) (n = 41,878)

Total 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.7% 41.2% 32.5%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not Vet)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 29.0% 44.1% 32.3% 30.0% 48.5% 37.1% NO* 0.90(n = 31) (n = 34) (n = 31) (n = 30) (n = 33) (n = 159)

No 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.6% 41.3% NO 1.00(n = 8,723) (n = 8,631) (n = 8,965) (n = 8,735) (n = 9,112) (n = 44,166)

Total 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.7% 41.2% 33.0%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not FY)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 35.7% 40.4% 42.8% 43.7% 45.2% 42.2% NO 1.02(n = 1,630) (n = 1,924) (n = 2,409) (n = 2,684) (n = 3,041) (n = 11,688)

No 38.7% 40.0% 44.4% 43.6% 42.6% 42.2% NO 1.02(n = 2,516) (n = 3,102) (n = 3,794) (n = 4,030) (n = 4,391) (n = 17,833)

Total 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.7% 41.2% 33.8%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not FG)


154 | P a g e

Units Attempted: First-Time Students

The following tables include only first-time students to GCCCD who were enrolled in the fall term.

Table 291: First-Time Students Units Attempted, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

0.1 - 2.9 Units 8.7% 5.9% 2.7% 3.3% 2.2% 4.5%(n = 146) (n = 95) (n = 52) (n = 59) (n = 40) (n = 392)

3.0 - 5.9 Units 18.1% 21.9% 14.6% 18.3% 14.5% 17.3%(n = 304) (n = 354) (n = 276) (n = 322) (n = 269) (n = 1,525)

6.0 - 8.9 Units 16.9% 16.3% 16.7% 14.2% 13.7% 15.5%(n = 285) (n = 264) (n = 316) (n = 251) (n = 253) (n = 1,369)

9.0 - 11.9 Units 14.4% 15.0% 15.6% 16.0% 15.9% 15.4%(n = 243) (n = 242) (n = 296) (n = 282) (n = 295) (n = 1,358)

12.0+ Units 41.9% 41.0% 50.3% 48.1% 53.7% 47.3%

(n = 704) (n = 663) (n = 953) (n = 848) (n = 993) (n = 4,161)


Avg. Units GCCCD 9.06 8.95 10.19 9.72 10.39 9.69

Avg. Units CC 7.36 7.42 8.77 8.28 8.59 8.12

Avg. Units GC 1.70 1.53 1.42 1.44 1.80 1.57


155 | P a g e

Table 292: First-Time Students Units Attempted by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 293: First-Time Students Units Attempted by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

African American/Black 40.5% 32.6% 47.9% 38.5% 42.7% 40.4% NO 0.85(n = 116) (n = 135) (n = 140) (n = 130) (n = 103) (n = 624)

American Indian 20.0% 16.7% 80.0% 57.1% 8.3% 31.4% YES* 0.67(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 12) (n = 35)

Asian 35.4% 35.6% 50.0% 41.0% 58.5% 44.7% NO 0.95(n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 50) (n = 39) (n = 53) (n = 235)




White 38.2% 38.3% 49.9% 46.5% 57.5% 46.7% NO 0.99(n = 727) (n = 629) (n = 760) (n = 755) (n = 843) (n = 3,714)


Total 41.9% 41.0% 50.3% 48.1% 53.7% 47.3% 40.0%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Latino)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 43.2% 43.0% 52.3% 51.3% 54.0% 49.1% NO 1.04(n = 787) (n = 782) (n = 889) (n = 856) (n = 952) (n = 4,266)

Male 40.8% 38.8% 48.7% 45.0% 53.7% 45.5% NO 0.96(n = 878) (n = 825) (n = 987) (n = 889) (n = 867) (n = 4,446)

Total 41.9% 41.0% 50.3% 48.1% 53.7% 47.3% 39.3%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Female)


156 | P a g e

Table 294: First-Time Students Units Attempted by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 295: First-Time Students Units Attempted by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 296: First-Time Students Units Attempted by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 57.3% 53.1% 66.5% 64.7% 67.5% 62.1% NO 1.31(n = 981) (n = 986) (n = 1,160) (n = 1,023) (n = 1,052) (n = 5,202)

20-24 years 26.1% 21.5% 27.8% 30.7% 36.2% 28.7% YES 0.61(n = 268) (n = 270) (n = 291) (n = 300) (n = 312) (n = 1,441)

25-39 years 20.6% 25.5% 24.8% 24.8% 35.8% 26.7% YES 0.57(n = 262) (n = 251) (n = 298) (n = 314) (n = 338) (n = 1,463)

40+ years 10.5% 15.3% 18.8% 12.8% 33.1% 18.2% YES 0.38(n = 171) (n = 111) (n = 144) (n = 125) (n = 148) (n = 699)

Total 41.9% 41.0% 50.3% 48.1% 53.7% 47.3% 49.7%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (< 20 years)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 29.0% 36.8% 39.0% 32.0% 38.7% 35.0% YES 0.74(n = 124) (n = 133) (n = 118) (n = 103) (n = 93) (n = 571)

No 42.9% 41.3% 51.1% 49.1% 54.5% 48.1% NO 1.02(n = 1,558) (n = 1,485) (n = 1,775) (n = 1,659) (n = 1,757) (n = 8,234)

Total 41.9% 41.0% 50.3% 48.1% 53.7% 47.3% 38.5%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 43.7% 45.7% 54.4% 55.2% 60.4% 52.4% NO 1.11(n = 1,052) (n = 988) (n = 1,203) (n = 1,143) (n = 1,251) (n = 5,637)

No 38.7% 33.5% 43.2% 35.1% 39.7% 38.1% NO 0.81(n = 630) (n = 630) (n = 690) (n = 619) (n = 599) (n = 3,168)

Total 41.9% 41.0% 50.3% 48.1% 53.7% 47.3% 30.5%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not Econ)


157 | P a g e

Table 297: First-Time Students Units Attempted by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 298: First-Time Students Units Attempted by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 299: First-Time Students Units Attempted by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 60.3% 68.5% 64.6% 63.4% 62.7% 64.1% NO 1.36(n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 96) (n = 71) (n = 75) (n = 409)

No 41.0% 39.4% 49.6% 47.5% 53.3% 46.4% NO 0.98(n = 1,604) (n = 1,529) (n = 1,797) (n = 1,691) (n = 1,775) (n = 8,396)

Total 41.9% 41.0% 50.3% 48.1% 53.7% 47.3% 37.2%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not Vet)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 20.0% 42.9% 40.0% 40.0% 80.0% 50.0% NO* 1.06(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 32)

No 41.9% 41.0% 50.4% 48.2% 53.5% 47.2% NO 1.00(n = 1,677) (n = 1,611) (n = 1,888) (n = 1,757) (n = 1,840) (n = 8,773)

Total 41.9% 41.0% 50.3% 48.1% 53.7% 47.3% 37.8%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not FY)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 39.0% 41.9% 47.0% 48.5% 55.3% 46.9% NO 0.99(n = 556) (n = 544) (n = 673) (n = 615) (n = 709) (n = 3,097)

No 45.9% 41.7% 51.9% 48.3% 51.9% 48.2% NO 1.02(n = 767) (n = 914) (n = 1,036) (n = 1,024) (n = 985) (n = 4,726)

Total 41.9% 41.0% 50.3% 48.1% 53.7% 47.3% 38.5%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not FG)


158 | P a g e

Units Completed Categories of units completed represent units completed districtwide, and the average units completed provide a breakdown of units completed districtwide and at each college. Units completed are counted for any course in which a grade notation was received (grades A, B, C, D, and P).

Units Completed: All Students

The following tables include all students enrolled in the fall term.

Table 300: All Students Units Completed, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

0 Units 16.6% 15.8% 15.3% 15.4% 16.4% 15.9%(n = 1,453) (n = 1,365) (n = 1,374) (n = 1,351) (n = 1,501) (n = 7,044)

0.1 - 2.9 Units 4.6% 4.2% 3.3% 3.0% 2.1% 3.4%(n = 404) (n = 367) (n = 295) (n = 263) (n = 193) (n = 1,522)

3.0 - 5.9 Units 20.5% 19.8% 20.2% 20.6% 19.5% 20.1%(n = 1,797) (n = 1,718) (n = 1,814) (n = 1,803) (n = 1,781) (n = 8,913)

6.0 - 8.9 Units 19.1% 19.1% 19.0% 19.2% 18.6% 19.0%(n = 1,671) (n = 1,652) (n = 1,710) (n = 1,681) (n = 1,703) (n = 8,417)

9.0 - 11.9 Units 15.2% 15.9% 16.9% 15.3% 16.4% 16.0%(n = 1,331) (n = 1,380) (n = 1,520) (n = 1,343) (n = 1,497) (n = 7,071)

12.0+ Units 24.0% 25.2% 25.4% 26.5% 27.0% 25.6%

(n = 2,098) (n = 2,183) (n = 2,283) (n = 2,324) (n = 2,470) (n = 11,358)


Avg. Units GCCCD 6.79 6.98 7.11 7.09 7.20 7.04

Avg. Units CC 5.27 5.37 5.59 5.66 5.69 5.52

Avg. Units GC 1.52 1.61 1.52 1.43 1.51 1.52


159 | P a g e

Table 301: All Students Units Completed by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 302: All Students Units Completed by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test


American Indian 15.2% 9.1% 15.9% 21.1% 5.1% 13.4% YES* 0.52(n = 33) (n = 33) (n = 44) (n = 38) (n = 39) (n = 187)

Asian 28.9% 26.2% 30.7% 33.1% 35.3% 30.7% NO 1.20(n = 322) (n = 317) (n = 306) (n = 284) (n = 292) (n = 1,521)

Filipino 18.5% 20.8% 24.8% 26.7% 23.5% 22.9% YES 0.89(n = 211) (n = 216) (n = 222) (n = 221) (n = 230) (n = 1,100)

Hispanic/Latino 23.2% 24.8% 24.1% 24.3% 22.5% 23.8% YES 0.93(n = 2,359) (n = 2,540) (n = 2,814) (n = 2,881) (n = 2,928) (n = 13,522)


White 25.1% 26.4% 27.4% 29.1% 32.1% 28.0% NO 1.09(n = 4,200) (n = 4,051) (n = 4,089) (n = 3,981) (n = 4,264) (n = 20,585)


Total 24.0% 25.2% 25.4% 26.5% 27.0% 25.6% 24.6%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Asian)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 24.1% 25.5% 25.1% 27.9% 28.3% 26.2% NO 1.02(n = 4,672) (n = 4,590) (n = 4,727) (n = 4,633) (n = 4,933) (n = 23,555)

Male 23.8% 24.8% 25.6% 24.9% 25.4% 24.9% NO 0.97(n = 4,002) (n = 4,005) (n = 4,215) (n = 4,078) (n = 4,130) (n = 20,430)

Total 24.0% 25.2% 25.4% 26.5% 27.0% 25.6% 21.0%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Female)


160 | P a g e

Table 303: All Students Units Completed by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 304: All Students Units Completed by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 36.3% 36.7% 38.5% 40.2% 37.3% 37.8% NO 1.47(n = 2,353) (n = 2,216) (n = 2,308) (n = 2,219) (n = 2,386) (n = 11,482)

20-24 years 23.4% 25.3% 25.0% 24.6% 25.3% 24.7% YES 0.97(n = 2,746) (n = 2,905) (n = 3,114) (n = 2,994) (n = 3,053) (n = 14,812)

25-39 years 17.4% 17.9% 17.5% 18.8% 20.2% 18.4% YES 0.72(n = 2,184) (n = 2,194) (n = 2,237) (n = 2,298) (n = 2,418) (n = 11,331)

40+ years 15.1% 17.9% 17.0% 20.9% 24.8% 19.0% YES 0.74(n = 1,471) (n = 1,350) (n = 1,337) (n = 1,254) (n = 1,288) (n = 6,700)

Total 24.0% 25.2% 25.4% 26.5% 27.0% 25.6% 30.2%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (< 20 years)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 21.4% 22.7% 21.5% 18.1% 23.1% 21.4% NO 0.83(n = 729) (n = 820) (n = 818) (n = 779) (n = 748) (n = 3,894)

No 24.2% 25.5% 25.8% 27.3% 27.4% 26.0% NO 1.02(n = 8,025) (n = 7,845) (n = 8,178) (n = 7,986) (n = 8,397) (n = 40,431)

Total 24.0% 25.2% 25.4% 26.5% 27.0% 25.6% 20.8%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not DSPS)


161 | P a g e

Table 305: All Students Units Completed by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Table 306: All Students Units Completed by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 307: All Students Units Completed by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 26.4% 27.6% 28.3% 30.4% 32.1% 29.0% NO 1.13(n = 5,341) (n = 5,476) (n = 5,843) (n = 5,792) (n = 6,032) (n = 28,484)

No 20.2% 21.1% 19.9% 18.9% 17.2% 19.5% NO 0.76(n = 3,413) (n = 3,189) (n = 3,153) (n = 2,973) (n = 3,113) (n = 15,841)

Total 24.0% 25.2% 25.4% 26.5% 27.0% 25.6% 15.6%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not Econ)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 34.9% 35.7% 30.5% 32.0% 26.0% 32.0% NO 1.25(n = 499) (n = 546) (n = 509) (n = 459) (n = 434) (n = 2,447)

No 23.3% 24.5% 25.1% 26.2% 27.1% 25.2% NO 0.99(n = 8,255) (n = 8,119) (n = 8,487) (n = 8,306) (n = 8,711) (n = 41,878)

Total 24.0% 25.2% 25.4% 26.5% 27.0% 25.6% 20.2%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not Vet)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 16.1% 23.5% 3.2% 6.7% 15.2% 13.2% YES* 0.52(n = 31) (n = 34) (n = 31) (n = 30) (n = 33) (n = 159)

No 24.0% 25.2% 25.5% 26.6% 27.1% 25.7% NO 1.00(n = 8,723) (n = 8,631) (n = 8,965) (n = 8,735) (n = 9,112) (n = 44,166)

Total 24.0% 25.2% 25.4% 26.5% 27.0% 25.6% 20.5%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not FY)


162 | P a g e

Table 308: All Students Units Completed by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 20.3% 24.4% 26.2% 27.4% 28.6% 26.0% NO 1.01(n = 1,630) (n = 1,924) (n = 2,409) (n = 2,684) (n = 3,041) (n = 11,688)

No 22.5% 24.9% 26.9% 28.1% 26.1% 26.0% NO 1.01(n = 2,516) (n = 3,102) (n = 3,794) (n = 4,030) (n = 4,391) (n = 17,833)

Total 24.0% 25.2% 25.4% 26.5% 27.0% 25.6% 20.8%

(n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not FG)


163 | P a g e

Units Completed: First-Time Students

The following tables include only first-time students to GCCCD who were enrolled in the fall term.

Table 309: First-Time Students Units Completed, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

0 Units 19.1% 19.3% 16.6% 17.5% 13.9% 17.2%(n = 321) (n = 313) (n = 315) (n = 309) (n = 257) (n = 1,515)

0.1 - 2.9 Units 5.8% 4.5% 3.3% 3.1% 2.3% 3.7%(n = 97) (n = 73) (n = 63) (n = 55) (n = 42) (n = 330)

3.0 - 5.9 Units 20.4% 21.6% 18.1% 18.8% 18.2% 19.4%(n = 343) (n = 350) (n = 343) (n = 332) (n = 337) (n = 1,705)

6.0 - 8.9 Units 16.7% 15.6% 17.2% 17.1% 15.6% 16.5%(n = 281) (n = 253) (n = 326) (n = 302) (n = 289) (n = 1,451)

9.0 - 11.9 Units 13.4% 14.4% 15.1% 13.2% 16.3% 14.5%(n = 225) (n = 233) (n = 285) (n = 232) (n = 301) (n = 1,276)

12.0+ Units 24.7% 24.5% 29.6% 30.2% 33.7% 28.7%

(n = 415) (n = 396) (n = 561) (n = 532) (n = 624) (n = 2,528)


Avg. Units GCCCD 6.62 6.57 7.38 7.20 7.89 7.16

Avg. Units CC 5.43 5.50 6.44 6.17 6.62 6.06

Avg. Units GC 1.19 1.07 0.94 1.03 1.27 1.10


164 | P a g e

Table 310: First-Time Students Units Completed by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 311: First-Time Students Units Completed by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test


American Indian 20.0% 0.0% 40.0% 28.6% 0.0% 14.3% YES* 0.50(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 12) (n = 35)

Asian 22.9% 31.1% 34.0% 25.6% 41.5% 31.5% NO 1.10(n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 50) (n = 39) (n = 53) (n = 235)




White 25.6% 25.4% 31.6% 30.6% 41.6% 31.4% NO 1.10(n = 727) (n = 629) (n = 760) (n = 755) (n = 843) (n = 3,714)


Total 24.7% 24.5% 29.6% 30.2% 33.7% 28.7% 25.2%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Asian)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 26.8% 27.9% 31.7% 33.9% 37.1% 31.7% NO 1.11(n = 787) (n = 782) (n = 889) (n = 856) (n = 952) (n = 4,266)

Male 22.9% 21.2% 28.0% 26.8% 30.3% 25.9% NO 0.90(n = 878) (n = 825) (n = 987) (n = 889) (n = 867) (n = 4,446)

Total 24.7% 24.5% 29.6% 30.2% 33.7% 28.7% 25.4%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Female)


165 | P a g e

Table 312: First-Time Students Units Completed by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 313: First-Time Students Units Completed by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 314: First-Time Students Units Completed by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 33.2% 32.5% 40.3% 42.2% 42.2% 38.2% NO 1.33(n = 981) (n = 986) (n = 1,160) (n = 1,023) (n = 1,052) (n = 5,202)

20-24 years 15.7% 10.0% 13.7% 15.3% 18.9% 14.9% YES 0.52(n = 268) (n = 270) (n = 291) (n = 300) (n = 312) (n = 1,441)

25-39 years 13.0% 15.1% 15.4% 13.4% 25.7% 16.9% YES 0.59(n = 262) (n = 251) (n = 298) (n = 314) (n = 338) (n = 1,463)

40+ years 7.6% 9.9% 5.6% 9.6% 23.0% 11.2% YES 0.39(n = 171) (n = 111) (n = 144) (n = 125) (n = 148) (n = 699)

Total 24.7% 24.5% 29.6% 30.2% 33.7% 28.7% 30.6%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (< 20 years)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 16.1% 19.5% 17.8% 17.5% 19.4% 18.0% YES 0.63(n = 124) (n = 133) (n = 118) (n = 103) (n = 93) (n = 571)

No 25.4% 24.9% 30.4% 31.0% 34.5% 29.5% NO 1.03(n = 1,558) (n = 1,485) (n = 1,775) (n = 1,659) (n = 1,757) (n = 8,234)

Total 24.7% 24.5% 29.6% 30.2% 33.7% 28.7% 23.6%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 24.3% 26.3% 30.7% 33.3% 37.4% 30.8% NO 1.07(n = 1,052) (n = 988) (n = 1,203) (n = 1,143) (n = 1,251) (n = 5,637)

No 25.2% 21.6% 27.8% 24.4% 26.0% 25.1% NO 0.87(n = 630) (n = 630) (n = 690) (n = 619) (n = 599) (n = 3,168)

Total 24.7% 24.5% 29.6% 30.2% 33.7% 28.7% 20.1%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not Econ)


166 | P a g e

Table 315: First-Time Students Units Completed by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 316: First-Time Students Units Completed by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 317: First-Time Students Units Completed by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 41.0% 38.2% 50.0% 38.0% 30.7% 40.1% NO 1.40(n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 96) (n = 71) (n = 75) (n = 409)

No 23.9% 23.7% 28.5% 29.9% 33.9% 28.2% NO 0.98(n = 1,604) (n = 1,529) (n = 1,797) (n = 1,691) (n = 1,775) (n = 8,396)

Total 24.7% 24.5% 29.6% 30.2% 33.7% 28.7% 22.5%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not Vet)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test


No 24.7% 24.5% 29.7% 30.2% 33.9% 28.8% NO 1.00(n = 1,677) (n = 1,611) (n = 1,888) (n = 1,757) (n = 1,840) (n = 8,773)

Total 24.7% 24.5% 29.6% 30.2% 33.7% 28.7% 23.0%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not FY)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 20.7% 23.3% 27.2% 28.8% 34.4% 27.3% NO 0.95(n = 556) (n = 544) (n = 673) (n = 615) (n = 709) (n = 3,097)

No 28.6% 26.1% 31.4% 31.3% 32.4% 30.1% NO 1.05(n = 767) (n = 914) (n = 1,036) (n = 1,024) (n = 985) (n = 4,726)

Total 24.7% 24.5% 29.6% 30.2% 33.7% 28.7% 24.1%

(n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not FG)


167 | P a g e

24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year These series of tables summarize the percentage of students that completed at least 24 units districtwide in their first year. Completed units are grade notations A, B, C, D, and P.

Figure 22: 24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year, Fall 2010-2014


168 | P a g e

Table 318: 24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2010-2014

Table 319: 24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year by Gender, Fall 2010-2014

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test


(n = 146) (n = 116) (n = 135) (n = 140) (n = 130) (n = 667)


Asian 19.5% 18.8% 20.0% 24.0% 25.6% 21.2% NO 1.14(n = 82) (n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 50) (n = 39) (n = 264)




White 16.3% 20.8% 17.5% 24.7% 24.1% 20.4% NO 1.10(n = 1,083) (n = 727) (n = 629) (n = 760) (n = 755) (n = 3,954)


Total 14.4% 19.0% 17.0% 22.1% 21.6% 18.6% 17.0%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Asian)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 15.1% 21.1% 19.6% 24.1% 25.2% 20.6% NO 1.11(n = 1,173) (n = 787) (n = 782) (n = 889) (n = 856) (n = 4,487)

Male 13.8% 17.4% 14.5% 20.5% 18.3% 16.8% NO 0.90(n = 1,140) (n = 878) (n = 825) (n = 987) (n = 889) (n = 4,719)

Total 14.4% 19.0% 17.0% 22.1% 21.6% 18.6% 16.5%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Female)


169 | P a g e

Table 320: 24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year by Age, Fall 2010-2014

Table 321: 24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year by Disability Status, Fall 2010-2014

Table 322: 24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2010-2014

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

< 20 years 20.4% 26.9% 23.3% 30.5% 32.2% 26.5% NO 1.42(n = 1,218) (n = 981) (n = 986) (n = 1,160) (n = 1,023) (n = 5,368)

20-24 years 10.6% 9.7% 6.3% 9.3% 7.3% 8.8% YES 0.47(n = 385) (n = 268) (n = 270) (n = 291) (n = 300) (n = 1,514)

25-39 years 6.9% 8.4% 7.6% 10.7% 8.0% 8.2% YES 0.44(n = 452) (n = 262) (n = 251) (n = 298) (n = 314) (n = 1,577)

40+ years 5.9% 4.7% 8.1% 4.2% 4.0% 5.4% YES 0.29(n = 287) (n = 171) (n = 111) (n = 144) (n = 125) (n = 838)

Total 14.4% 19.0% 17.0% 22.1% 21.6% 18.6% 21.2%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (< 20 years)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 12.9% 8.9% 15.8% 14.4% 9.7% 12.5% YES 0.67(n = 170) (n = 124) (n = 133) (n = 118) (n = 103) (n = 648)

No 14.5% 19.8% 17.1% 22.6% 22.4% 19.1% NO 1.02(n = 2,172) (n = 1,558) (n = 1,485) (n = 1,775) (n = 1,659) (n = 8,649)

Total 14.4% 19.0% 17.0% 22.1% 21.6% 18.6% 15.3%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not DSPS)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 13.0% 18.4% 17.8% 22.6% 23.8% 19.1% NO 1.02(n = 1,283) (n = 1,052) (n = 988) (n = 1,203) (n = 1,143) (n = 5,669)

No 16.1% 20.0% 15.7% 21.3% 17.6% 17.9% NO 0.96(n = 1,059) (n = 630) (n = 630) (n = 690) (n = 619) (n = 3,628)

Total 14.4% 19.0% 17.0% 22.1% 21.6% 18.6% 14.4%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not Econ)


170 | P a g e

Table 323: 24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year by Veteran Status, Fall 2010-2014

Table 324: 24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2010-2014

Table 325: 24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year by 1st Generation, Fall 2010-2014

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 22.4% 28.2% 29.2% 38.5% 22.5% 28.5% NO 1.53(n = 98) (n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 96) (n = 71) (n = 432)

No 14.0% 18.6% 16.3% 21.3% 21.6% 18.2% NO 0.97(n = 2,244) (n = 1,604) (n = 1,529) (n = 1,797) (n = 1,691) (n = 8,865)

Total 14.4% 19.0% 17.0% 22.1% 21.6% 18.6% 14.5%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not Vet)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% YES* 0.15(n = 13) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 35)

No 14.5% 19.0% 17.1% 22.2% 21.7% 18.7% NO 1.00(n = 2,329) (n = 1,677) (n = 1,611) (n = 1,888) (n = 1,757) (n = 9,262)

Total 14.4% 19.0% 17.0% 22.1% 21.6% 18.6% 15.0%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not FY)

Fall

2010

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 8.0% 18.3% 14.9% 19.9% 19.3% 16.7% NO 0.90(n = 435) (n = 556) (n = 544) (n = 673) (n = 615) (n = 2,823)

No 11.5% 21.5% 19.0% 23.8% 23.3% 20.3% NO 1.09(n = 738) (n = 767) (n = 914) (n = 1,036) (n = 1,024) (n = 4,479)

Total 14.4% 19.0% 17.0% 22.1% 21.6% 18.6% 16.3%

(n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not FG)


171 | P a g e

30+ Units Completion Rate (Student Success Scorecard) Derived from the completion cohorts in the Student Success Scorecard, the 30+ Units Completion Rate tracks first time students in the system that earned at least six units (within six years of their first enrollments) and attempted any level of math or English within three years and identifies the percentage of students who completed 30 or more degree-applicable units anywhere in the system with six years of their first enrollment.

Figure 23: 30+ Unit Completion Rate Five-Year Trends


172 | P a g e

Table 326: 30+ Unit Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Race/Ethnicity

Table 327: 30+ Unit Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Gender

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test



Asian 80.6% 73.5% 66.7% 77.6% 80.7% 77.0% NO 1.13(n = 31) (n = 34) (n = 33) (n = 49) (n = 88) (n = 235)




White 66.3% 69.8% 65.6% 70.4% 77.8% 70.5% NO 1.03(n = 504) (n = 553) (n = 637) (n = 611) (n = 770) (n = 3,075)



Total 66.1% 67.2% 63.4% 69.1% 73.4% 68.2% 56.4%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (White)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 69.8% 70.5% 64.9% 71.0% 74.9% 70.4% NO 1.03(n = 506) (n = 607) (n = 692) (n = 799) (n = 832) (n = 3,436)

Male 62.3% 63.4% 61.8% 66.7% 71.9% 65.6% NO 0.96(n = 454) (n = 492) (n = 570) (n = 610) (n = 658) (n = 2,784)

Total 66.1% 67.2% 63.4% 69.1% 73.4% 68.2% 56.3%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Female)


173 | P a g e

Table 328: 30+ Unit Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Age

Table 329: 30+ Unit Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Disability Status

Table 330: 30+ Unit Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Economically Disadvantaged

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

<20 years 68.1% 67.5% 62.6% 67.3% 70.6% 67.1% NO 0.98(n = 796) (n = 935) (n = 1,052) (n = 1,117) (n = 1,019) (n = 4,919)

20-24 years 56.7% 52.6% 57.3% 67.9% 69.9% 62.7% NO 0.92(n = 60) (n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 109) (n = 146) (n = 482)

25-39 years 53.5% 84.4% 71.8% 79.8% 83.9% 76.7% NO 1.12(n = 71) (n = 45) (n = 71) (n = 109) (n = 180) (n = 476)

40+ years 61.5% 69.6% 77.8% 79.1% 82.8% 77.7% NO 1.14(n = 39) (n = 46) (n = 54) (n = 91) (n = 169) (n = 399)

Total 66.1% 67.2% 63.4% 69.1% 73.4% 68.2% 53.7%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (<20 years)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 60.0% 78.7% 76.7% 63.6% 75.6% 71.1% NO 1.04(n = 55) (n = 61) (n = 73) (n = 88) (n = 86) (n = 363)

No 66.5% 66.5% 62.6% 69.4% 73.3% 68.0% NO 1.00(n = 943) (n = 1,043) (n = 1,193) (n = 1,338) (n = 1,428) (n = 5,945)

Total 66.1% 67.2% 63.4% 69.1% 73.4% 68.2% 54.4%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Not DSPS)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 68.9% 70.3% 68.5% 72.7% 76.2% 72.1% NO 1.06(n = 557) (n = 634) (n = 753) (n = 1,030) (n = 1,195) (n = 4,169)

No 62.6% 63.0% 55.9% 59.6% 63.3% 60.6% NO 0.89(n = 441) (n = 470) (n = 513) (n = 396) (n = 319) (n = 2,139)

Total 66.1% 67.2% 63.4% 69.1% 73.4% 68.2% 48.5%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (No Econ)


174 | P a g e

Table 331: 30+ Unit Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Veteran Status

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 72.2% 66.7% 69.6% 75.7% 72.0% 71.2% NO 1.04(n = 36) (n = 36) (n = 46) (n = 37) (n = 50) (n = 205)

No 65.9% 67.2% 63.2% 68.9% 73.5% 68.1% NO 1.00(n = 962) (n = 1,068) (n = 1,220) (n = 1,389) (n = 1,464) (n = 6,103)

Total 66.1% 67.2% 63.4% 69.1% 73.4% 68.2% 54.5%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Non Vet)


175 | P a g e

GPA

GPA: All Students

Table 332: GPA of All Students, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

< 2.00 17.5% 17.4% 18.6% 19.8% 20.5% 18.8%

(n = 1,308) (n = 1,308) (n = 1,455) (n = 1,530) (n = 1,614) (n = 7,215)

2.00 - 2.59 18.0% 16.9% 15.9% 16.4% 14.8% 16.4%(n = 1,352) (n = 1,271) (n = 1,244) (n = 1,268) (n = 1,165) (n = 6,300)

2.60 - 2.99 9.5% 9.6% 9.4% 8.8% 9.1% 9.3%(n = 708) (n = 720) (n = 737) (n = 677) (n = 718) (n = 3,559)

3.00+ 55.0% 56.1% 56.1% 55.0% 55.7% 55.6%

(n = 4,124) (n = 4,217) (n = 4,394) (n = 4,247) (n = 4,390) (n = 21,372)

Total (n = 7,492) (n = 7,516) (n = 7,830) (n = 7,722) (n = 7,887) (n = 38,447)

GPA GCCCD 2.75 2.76 2.75 2.71 2.74 2.74


176 | P a g e

Table 333: GPA of All Students by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 334: GPA of All Students by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

African American/Black 2.23 2.26 2.29 2.25 2.23 2.25(n = 429) (n = 432) (n = 457) (n = 439) (n = 411) (n = 2,168)

American Indian 2.58 2.81 2.57 2.68 2.93 2.72(n = 30) (n = 30) (n = 36) (n = 35) (n = 35) (n = 166)

Asian 2.94 3.01 2.88 3.07 2.96 2.97(n = 271) (n = 276) (n = 278) (n = 251) (n = 262) (n = 1,338)

Filipino 2.74 2.89 2.92 2.70 2.70 2.79(n = 183) (n = 197) (n = 199) (n = 201) (n = 208) (n = 988)

Hispanic/Latino 2.57 2.54 2.52 2.47 2.45 2.51(n = 2,059) (n = 2,247) (n = 2,476) (n = 2,582) (n = 2,504) (n = 11,868)

Pacific Islander 2.70 2.74 2.36 2.49 2.34 2.55(n = 53) (n = 40) (n = 43) (n = 39) (n = 25) (n = 200)

White 2.91 2.91 2.94 2.93 2.98 2.94(n = 3,577) (n = 3,497) (n = 3,560) (n = 3,477) (n = 3,719) (n = 17,830)

Two or more 2.66 2.80 2.71 2.64 2.67 2.70(n = 561) (n = 562) (n = 597) (n = 582) (n = 627) (n = 2,929)

Total 2.75 2.76 2.75 2.71 2.74 2.74

(n = 7,492) (n = 7,516) (n = 7,830) (n = 7,722) (n = 7,887) (n = 38,447)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Female 2.83 2.86 2.82 2.80 2.82 2.82(n = 3,989) (n = 3,931) (n = 4,082) (n = 4,059) (n = 4,248) (n = 20,309)

Male 2.65 2.64 2.67 2.62 2.64 2.64(n = 3,434) (n = 3,523) (n = 3,703) (n = 3,615) (n = 3,578) (n = 17,853)

Total 2.75 2.76 2.75 2.71 2.74 2.74

(n = 7,492) (n = 7,516) (n = 7,830) (n = 7,722) (n = 7,887) (n = 38,447)


177 | P a g e

Table 335: GPA of All Students by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 336: GPA of All Students by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

< 20 years 2.60 2.60 2.56 2.54 2.58 2.57(n = 2,165) (n = 2,030) (n = 2,150) (n = 2,075) (n = 2,070) (n = 10,490)

20-24 years 2.59 2.64 2.61 2.54 2.55 2.58(n = 2,389) (n = 2,570) (n = 2,751) (n = 2,687) (n = 2,755) (n = 13,152)

25-39 years 2.86 2.86 2.91 2.85 2.87 2.87(n = 1,778) (n = 1,823) (n = 1,837) (n = 1,942) (n = 2,027) (n = 9,407)

40+ years 3.20 3.17 3.19 3.26 3.26 3.22(n = 1,160) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,092) (n = 1,018) (n = 1,035) (n = 5,398)

Total 2.75 2.76 2.75 2.71 2.74 2.74

(n = 7,492) (n = 7,516) (n = 7,830) (n = 7,722) (n = 7,887) (n = 38,447)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 2.77 2.72 2.70 2.73 2.71 2.73(n = 586) (n = 675) (n = 699) (n = 660) (n = 643) (n = 3,263)

No 2.75 2.76 2.75 2.71 2.74 2.74(n = 6,906) (n = 6,841) (n = 7,131) (n = 7,062) (n = 7,244) (n = 35,184)

Total 2.75 2.76 2.75 2.71 2.74 2.74

(n = 7,492) (n = 7,516) (n = 7,830) (n = 7,722) (n = 7,887) (n = 38,447)


178 | P a g e

Table 337: GPA of All Students by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Table 338: GPA of All Students by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 339: GPA of All Students by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 2.67 2.72 2.70 2.67 2.72 2.70(n = 4,496) (n = 4,676) (n = 5,000) (n = 5,045) (n = 5,270) (n = 24,487)

No 2.86 2.82 2.83 2.79 2.77 2.82(n = 2,996) (n = 2,840) (n = 2,830) (n = 2,677) (n = 2,617) (n = 13,960)

Total 2.75 2.76 2.75 2.71 2.74 2.74

(n = 7,492) (n = 7,516) (n = 7,830) (n = 7,722) (n = 7,887) (n = 38,447)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 2.77 2.76 2.82 2.75 2.69 2.76(n = 458) (n = 493) (n = 453) (n = 416) (n = 384) (n = 2,204)

No 2.75 2.76 2.74 2.71 2.74 2.74(n = 7,034) (n = 7,023) (n = 7,377) (n = 7,306) (n = 7,503) (n = 36,243)

Total 2.75 2.76 2.75 2.71 2.74 2.74

(n = 7,492) (n = 7,516) (n = 7,830) (n = 7,722) (n = 7,887) (n = 38,447)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 2.37 2.31 2.07 1.16 2.15 2.04(n = 28) (n = 29) (n = 25) (n = 23) (n = 27) (n = 132)

No 2.75 2.76 2.75 2.72 2.74 2.74(n = 7,464) (n = 7,487) (n = 7,805) (n = 7,699) (n = 7,860) (n = 38,315)

Total 2.75 2.76 2.75 2.71 2.74 2.74

(n = 7,492) (n = 7,516) (n = 7,830) (n = 7,722) (n = 7,887) (n = 38,447)


179 | P a g e

Table 340: GPA of All Students by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 2.60 2.62 2.63 2.63 2.72 2.65(n = 1,303) (n = 1,587) (n = 2,031) (n = 2,320) (n = 2,572) (n = 9,813)

No 2.69 2.71 2.72 2.70 2.70 2.71(n = 2,242) (n = 2,754) (n = 3,380) (n = 3,617) (n = 3,939) (n = 15,932)

Total 2.75 2.76 2.75 2.71 2.74 2.74

(n = 7,492) (n = 7,516) (n = 7,830) (n = 7,722) (n = 7,887) (n = 38,447)


180 | P a g e

GPA: First-Time Students

Table 341: GPA of First-Time Students, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

< 2.00 21.7% 22.4% 26.0% 24.8% 25.0% 24.1%

(n = 309) (n = 311) (n = 435) (n = 381) (n = 406) (n = 1,842)

2.00 - 2.59 17.1% 17.8% 16.6% 18.9% 14.7% 17.0%(n = 243) (n = 247) (n = 278) (n = 290) (n = 239) (n = 1,297)

2.60 - 2.99 9.9% 9.0% 9.6% 8.3% 9.5% 9.3%(n = 141) (n = 125) (n = 160) (n = 127) (n = 154) (n = 707)

3.00+ 51.2% 50.8% 47.7% 48.1% 50.7% 49.6%

(n = 728) (n = 704) (n = 797) (n = 740) (n = 823) (n = 3,792)

Total (n = 1,421) (n = 1,387) (n = 1,670) (n = 1,538) (n = 1,622) (n = 7,638)

GPA GCCCD 2.62 2.57 2.49 2.52 2.60 2.56


181 | P a g e

Table 342: GPA of First-Time Students by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2011-2015

Table 343: GPA of First-Time Students by Gender, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

African American/Black 1.90 2.08 1.86 1.87 2.02 1.94(n = 92) (n = 105) (n = 121) (n = 109) (n = 87) (n = 514)

American Indian 2.35 2.56 1.57 3.13 2.60 2.54(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 11) (n = 32)

Asian 2.98 3.18 2.74 2.96 2.77 2.91(n = 40) (n = 37) (n = 42) (n = 33) (n = 47) (n = 199)

Filipino 2.74 3.06 2.43 2.45 2.66 2.68(n = 39) (n = 47) (n = 41) (n = 39) (n = 35) (n = 201)

Hispanic/Latino 2.57 2.47 2.36 2.45 2.43 2.45(n = 524) (n = 562) (n = 659) (n = 591) (n = 585) (n = 2,921)

Pacific Islander 2.81 1.84 1.93 2.87 1.65 2.25(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 33)

White 2.78 2.69 2.75 2.68 2.83 2.75(n = 599) (n = 537) (n = 675) (n = 644) (n = 724) (n = 3,179)

Two or more 2.27 2.65 2.34 2.44 2.41 2.41(n = 93) (n = 73) (n = 106) (n = 97) (n = 118) (n = 487)

Total 2.62 2.57 2.49 2.52 2.60 2.56

(n = 1,421) (n = 1,387) (n = 1,670) (n = 1,538) (n = 1,622) (n = 7,638)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Female 2.72 2.73 2.60 2.64 2.71 2.68(n = 672) (n = 668) (n = 783) (n = 737) (n = 835) (n = 3,695)

Male 2.51 2.43 2.40 2.41 2.47 2.44(n = 735) (n = 710) (n = 875) (n = 786) (n = 758) (n = 3,864)

Total 2.62 2.57 2.49 2.52 2.60 2.56

(n = 1,421) (n = 1,387) (n = 1,670) (n = 1,538) (n = 1,622) (n = 7,638)


182 | P a g e

Table 344: GPA of First-Time Students by Age, Fall 2011-2015

Table 345: GPA of First-Time Students by Disability Status, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

< 20 years 2.55 2.53 2.47 2.51 2.55 2.52(n = 899) (n = 894) (n = 1,089) (n = 945) (n = 997) (n = 4,824)

20-24 years 2.61 2.47 2.34 2.33 2.44 2.43(n = 208) (n = 218) (n = 235) (n = 252) (n = 270) (n = 1,183)

25-39 years 2.69 2.75 2.64 2.56 2.84 2.70(n = 190) (n = 194) (n = 234) (n = 248) (n = 263) (n = 1,129)

40+ years 3.03 2.89 2.71 3.10 2.86 2.92(n = 124) (n = 81) (n = 112) (n = 93) (n = 92) (n = 502)

Total 2.62 2.57 2.49 2.52 2.60 2.56

(n = 1,421) (n = 1,387) (n = 1,670) (n = 1,538) (n = 1,622) (n = 7,638)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 2.54 2.54 2.10 2.37 2.39 2.39(n = 85) (n = 106) (n = 99) (n = 83) (n = 82) (n = 455)

No 2.62 2.58 2.52 2.53 2.61 2.57(n = 1,336) (n = 1,281) (n = 1,571) (n = 1,455) (n = 1,540) (n = 7,183)

Total 2.62 2.57 2.49 2.52 2.60 2.56

(n = 1,421) (n = 1,387) (n = 1,670) (n = 1,538) (n = 1,622) (n = 7,638)


183 | P a g e

Table 346: GPA of First-Time Students by Economically Disadvantaged, Fall 2011-2015

Table 347: GPA of First-Time Students by Veteran Status, Fall 2011-2015

Table 348: GPA of First-Time Students by Foster Youth Status, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 2.53 2.51 2.39 2.43 2.52 2.47(n = 866) (n = 825) (n = 1,038) (n = 974) (n = 1,072) (n = 4,775)

No 2.76 2.67 2.66 2.69 2.75 2.71(n = 555) (n = 562) (n = 632) (n = 564) (n = 550) (n = 2,863)

Total 2.62 2.57 2.49 2.52 2.60 2.56

(n = 1,421) (n = 1,387) (n = 1,670) (n = 1,538) (n = 1,622) (n = 7,638)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 2.77 2.78 2.77 2.47 2.66 2.70(n = 74) (n = 83) (n = 88) (n = 64) (n = 66) (n = 375)

No 2.61 2.56 2.48 2.53 2.60 2.55(n = 1,347) (n = 1,304) (n = 1,582) (n = 1,474) (n = 1,556) (n = 7,263)

Total 2.62 2.57 2.49 2.52 2.60 2.56

(n = 1,421) (n = 1,387) (n = 1,670) (n = 1,538) (n = 1,622) (n = 7,638)

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 2.13 2.08 1.16 1.77 2.08 1.89(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 29)

No 2.62 2.58 2.50 2.53 2.60 2.56(n = 1,416) (n = 1,381) (n = 1,665) (n = 1,534) (n = 1,613) (n = 7,609)

Total 2.62 2.57 2.49 2.52 2.60 2.56

(n = 1,421) (n = 1,387) (n = 1,670) (n = 1,538) (n = 1,622) (n = 7,638)


184 | P a g e

Table 349: GPA of First-Time Students by 1st Generation, Fall 2011-2015

Fall

2011

Fall

2012

Fall

2013

Fall

2014

Fall

2015

Five-Year

Average

Yes 2.48 2.46 2.38 2.46 2.57 2.47(n = 430) (n = 451) (n = 575) (n = 524) (n = 597) (n = 2,577)

No 2.69 2.64 2.57 2.55 2.63 2.61(n = 697) (n = 818) (n = 944) (n = 917) (n = 920) (n = 4,296)

Total 2.62 2.57 2.49 2.52 2.60 2.56

(n = 1,421) (n = 1,387) (n = 1,670) (n = 1,538) (n = 1,622) (n = 7,638)


185 | P a g e

STUDENT SUCCESS OUTCOMES

Completion Rates (Student Success Scorecard) The Completion Rate data are derived from the completion cohorts in the Student Success Scorecard. The completion cohorts comprise of first time students in the system that earned at least six units (within six years of their first enrollments) and attempted any level of math or English within three years. Successful completion includes students who earned a degree or certificate OR transferred to a 4-year institution OR were transfer-prepared within six years of their first enrollment. Students are transfer-prepared if they successfully completed 60+ UC/CSU transferrable units with a GPA greater than or equal to 2.0.

Figure 24: Completion Rate Five-Year Trends


186 | P a g e

Figure 25: Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Outcome Categories


187 | P a g e

Table 350: Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Detailed Outcomes

Table 351: Percentage of Transfer Students with No Degrees/Certificates by Completed Units, 2005-2015

2005-06 to

2010-11

(n = 998)

2006-07 to

2011-12

(n = 1,104)

2007-08 to

2012-13

(n = 1,266)

2008-09 to

2013-14

(n = 1,426)

2009-10 to

2014-15

(n = 1,514)

Degree Only 1.7% 2.2% 1.8% 2.4% 2.8%

Degree & Transfer 0.9% 1.5% 1.3% 1.8% 1.5%

Degree & Transfer-Prepared 5.9% 5.8% 5.1% 5.1% 6.6%

Degree, Transfer, & Transfer-Prepared 10.9% 7.2% 8.5% 9.9% 11.0%

Overall Degree or Certificate 19.4% 16.8% 16.6% 19.1% 21.8%

Transfer Only 12.1% 12.7% 15.2% 12.5% 11.0%

Transfer & Transfer-Prepared 10.8% 11.9% 10.3% 9.3% 8.1%

Overall Transfer (No Degree) 22.9% 24.5% 25.4% 21.7% 19.1%

Transfer-Prepared Only 6.6% 7.3% 5.5% 6.5% 6.8%

Total Completions 49.0% 48.6% 47.6% 47.4% 47.7%

Completed Units

2005-06 to

2010-11

(n = 998)

2006-07 to

2011-12

(n = 1,104)

2007-08 to

2012-13

(n = 1,266)

2008-09 to

2013-14

(n = 1,426)

2009-10 to

2014-15

(n = 1,514)

0 - 11.9 8.7% 8.9% 13.7% 10.0% 10.4%

12 - 23.9 15.7% 12.9% 14.6% 11.9% 13.5%

24 - 35.9 5.7% 7.0% 8.1% 8.4% 7.3%

36 - 47.9 5.2% 7.0% 5.9% 6.5% 5.9%

48 - 59.9 8.7% 6.6% 7.8% 13.5% 9.0%

60 - 71.9 15.7% 15.1% 13.0% 16.5% 14.9%

72 - 83.9 17.5% 20.7% 20.5% 17.7% 20.1%

84 - 95.9 10.9% 10.7% 8.1% 7.1% 13.5%

96+ 11.8% 11.1% 8.4% 8.4% 5.5%

Total Transfers (No Degrees) 229 271 322 310 289


188 | P a g e

Table 352: Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Race/Ethnicity

Table 353: Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Gender

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test



Asian 54.8% 50.0% 48.5% 51.0% 42.0% 47.7% NO 0.99(n = 31) (n = 34) (n = 33) (n = 49) (n = 88) (n = 235)




White 52.6% 50.3% 51.5% 49.3% 48.6% 50.3% NO 1.05(n = 504) (n = 553) (n = 637) (n = 611) (n = 770) (n = 3,075)



Total 49.0% 48.6% 47.6% 47.4% 47.7% 48.0% 40.2%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (White)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 51.8% 53.0% 51.3% 52.3% 51.0% 51.8% NO 1.08(n = 506) (n = 607) (n = 692) (n = 799) (n = 832) (n = 3,436)

Male 45.6% 43.5% 42.8% 41.3% 43.5% 43.2% NO 0.90(n = 454) (n = 492) (n = 570) (n = 610) (n = 658) (n = 2,784)

Total 49.0% 48.6% 47.6% 47.4% 47.7% 48.0% 41.5%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Female)


189 | P a g e

Table 354: Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Age

Table 355: Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Disability Status

Table 356: Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Economically Disadvantaged

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

<20 years 51.4% 51.3% 48.7% 49.1% 54.4% 50.9% NO 1.06(n = 796) (n = 935) (n = 1,052) (n = 1,117) (n = 1,019) (n = 4,919)

20-24 years 35.0% 32.1% 40.4% 45.0% 38.4% 38.8% YES 0.81(n = 60) (n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 109) (n = 146) (n = 482)

25-39 years 35.2% 33.3% 43.7% 42.2% 32.8% 37.0% YES 0.77(n = 71) (n = 45) (n = 71) (n = 109) (n = 180) (n = 476)

40+ years 38.5% 37.0% 42.6% 36.3% 31.4% 35.3% YES 0.74(n = 39) (n = 46) (n = 54) (n = 91) (n = 169) (n = 399)

Total 49.0% 48.6% 47.6% 47.4% 47.7% 48.0% 40.7%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (<20 years)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 50.9% 42.6% 38.4% 37.5% 38.4% 40.8% NO 0.85(n = 55) (n = 61) (n = 73) (n = 88) (n = 86) (n = 363)

No 48.9% 49.0% 48.1% 48.1% 48.2% 48.4% NO 1.01(n = 943) (n = 1,043) (n = 1,193) (n = 1,338) (n = 1,428) (n = 5,945)

Total 49.0% 48.6% 47.6% 47.4% 47.7% 48.0% 38.7%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Not DSPS)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 48.5% 45.6% 42.8% 47.0% 44.9% 45.6% NO 0.95(n = 557) (n = 634) (n = 753) (n = 1,030) (n = 1,195) (n = 4,169)

No 49.7% 52.8% 54.6% 48.5% 58.3% 52.6% NO 1.10(n = 441) (n = 470) (n = 513) (n = 396) (n = 319) (n = 2,139)

Total 49.0% 48.6% 47.6% 47.4% 47.7% 48.0% 42.1%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (No Econ)


190 | P a g e

Table 357: Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Veteran Status

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 47.2% 41.7% 54.3% 37.8% 64.0% 50.2% NO 1.05(n = 36) (n = 36) (n = 46) (n = 37) (n = 50) (n = 205)

No 49.1% 48.9% 47.3% 47.7% 47.1% 47.9% NO 1.00(n = 962) (n = 1,068) (n = 1,220) (n = 1,389) (n = 1,464) (n = 6,103)

Total 49.0% 48.6% 47.6% 47.4% 47.7% 48.0% 38.3%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Non Vet)


191 | P a g e

Figure 26: Completion Rate Five-Year Trends, Prepared Students


192 | P a g e

Table 358: Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Detailed Outcomes, Prepared Students

2005-06 to

2010-11

(n = 180)

2006-07 to

2011-12

(n = 192)

2007-08 to

2012-13

(n = 206)

2008-09 to

2013-14

(n = 247)

2009-10 to

2013-14

(n = 210)

Degree Only 1.7% 1.6% 3.4% 2.0% 1.9%

Degree & Transfer 1.1% 2.6% 2.4% 2.8% 4.8%




Transfer Only 30.6% 29.2% 32.0% 25.1% 29.5%






193 | P a g e

Figure 27: Completion Rate Five-Year Trends, Unprepared Students


194 | P a g e

Table 359: Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Detailed Outcomes, Unprepared Students

2005-06 to

2010-11

(n = 818)

2006-07 to

2011-12

(n = 912)

2007-08 to

2012-13

(n = 1,060)

2008-09 to

2013-14

(n = 1,179)

2009-10 to

2014-15

(n = 1,304)

Degree Only 1.7% 2.3% 1.5% 2.5% 2.9%

Degree & Transfer 0.9% 1.3% 1.0% 1.5% 0.9%




Transfer Only 8.1% 9.2% 11.9% 9.8% 8.1%






195 | P a g e

CTE Completion Rates (Student Success Scorecard) The Career Technical Education (CTE) completion cohort includes first-time students in the system in the starting academic year that completed a CTE course and completed more than eight units in a single CTE discipline (two digit vocational TOP Code and completed at least one course with SAM Code of B or C) within three years. Successful completion includes students who earned a degree or certificate OR transferred to a 4-year institution OR were transfer-prepared within six years of their first enrollment. Students are transfer-prepared if they successfully completed 60+ UC/CSU transferrable units with a GPA greater than or equal to 2.0.

Figure 28: CTE Completion Rate Five-Year Trends


196 | P a g e

Table 360: CTE Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Race/Ethnicity

Table 361: CTE Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Gender

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test



Asian 65.0% 57.9% 50.0% 65.4% 54.9% 57.5% NO 1.13(n = 20) (n = 19) (n = 30) (n = 26) (n = 51) (n = 146)


Hispanic 45.8% 49.6% 50.3% 49.2% 45.2% 47.9% NO 0.94(n = 155) (n = 123) (n = 163) (n = 177) (n = 188) (n = 806)

Pacific Islander 75.0% 61.5% 33.3% 60.0% 57.1% 57.5% NO* 1.13(n = 1 to 9) (n = 13) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 40)

White 52.1% 54.3% 50.4% 47.8% 50.5% 50.8% NO 1.00(n = 378) (n = 376) (n = 417) (n = 456) (n = 539) (n = 2,166)



Total 49.9% 52.9% 51.0% 49.6% 51.2% 50.9% 46.0%

(n = 698) (n = 673) (n = 773) (n = 846) (n = 989) (n = 3,979) (Asian)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 47.7% 54.9% 54.8% 52.0% 54.4% 52.9% NO 1.04(n = 331) (n = 350) (n = 400) (n = 440) (n = 485) (n = 2,006)

Male 51.7% 51.9% 46.7% 47.2% 48.0% 48.9% NO 0.96(n = 350) (n = 312) (n = 368) (n = 398) (n = 490) (n = 1,918)

Total 49.9% 52.9% 51.0% 49.6% 51.2% 50.9% 43.5%

(n = 698) (n = 673) (n = 773) (n = 846) (n = 989) (n = 3,979) (Female)


197 | P a g e

Table 362: CTE Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Age

Table 363: CTE Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Disability Status

Table 364: CTE Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Economically Disadvantaged

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

<20 years 57.3% 64.4% 62.0% 58.8% 60.1% 60.5% NO 1.19(n = 185) (n = 188) (n = 192) (n = 194) (n = 228) (n = 987)

20-24 years 57.8% 64.6% 57.3% 59.7% 60.8% 60.1% NO 1.18(n = 173) (n = 175) (n = 185) (n = 236) (n = 263) (n = 1,032)

25-39 years 43.9% 47.8% 49.1% 45.3% 43.8% 45.8% YES 0.90(n = 189) (n = 157) (n = 220) (n = 236) (n = 283) (n = 1,085)

40+ years 37.9% 30.9% 34.7% 32.2% 39.5% 35.3% YES 0.69(n = 145) (n = 152) (n = 176) (n = 180) (n = 215) (n = 868)

Total 49.9% 52.9% 51.0% 49.6% 51.2% 50.9% 48.4%

(n = 698) (n = 673) (n = 773) (n = 846) (n = 989) (n = 3,979) (<20 years)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 58.8% 60.6% 59.5% 50.0% 48.9% 54.5% NO 1.07(n = 34) (n = 33) (n = 42) (n = 64) (n = 47) (n = 220)

No 49.4% 52.5% 50.5% 49.6% 51.3% 50.7% NO 1.00(n = 664) (n = 640) (n = 731) (n = 782) (n = 942) (n = 3,759)

Total 49.9% 52.9% 51.0% 49.6% 51.2% 50.9% 40.5%

(n = 698) (n = 673) (n = 773) (n = 846) (n = 989) (n = 3,979) (Not DSPS)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 54.8% 59.8% 58.9% 51.2% 51.3% 54.1% NO 1.06(n = 378) (n = 363) (n = 409) (n = 692) (n = 857) (n = 2,699)

No 44.1% 44.8% 42.0% 42.9% 50.0% 44.1% NO 0.87(n = 320) (n = 310) (n = 364) (n = 154) (n = 132) (n = 1,280)

Total 49.9% 52.9% 51.0% 49.6% 51.2% 50.9% 35.3%

(n = 698) (n = 673) (n = 773) (n = 846) (n = 989) (n = 3,979) (No Econ)


198 | P a g e

Table 365: CTE Completion Rate Five-Year Trends by Veteran Status

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 56.7% 50.8% 57.9% 62.3% 61.2% 58.0% NO 1.14(n = 67) (n = 61) (n = 76) (n = 61) (n = 85) (n = 350)

No 49.1% 53.1% 50.2% 48.7% 50.2% 50.2% NO 0.99(n = 631) (n = 612) (n = 697) (n = 785) (n = 904) (n = 3,629)

Total 49.9% 52.9% 51.0% 49.6% 51.2% 50.9% 40.1%

(n = 698) (n = 673) (n = 773) (n = 846) (n = 989) (n = 3,979) (Non Vet)


199 | P a g e

Degrees and Certificates The number of awards given by the college in five years has increased 46% since 2010-11. The number of degrees issued by the college has increased 64 percent.

Table 366: Number of Awards by Type, 2010-2015

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

Degrees

A.A. Degree 155 181 182 212 191

A.A.-T Degree -- -- 34 82 103

A.S. Degree 285 307 403 393 351

A.S.-T Degree -- -- -- 18 77

Total Degrees 440 488 619 705 722

Certificates

60+ Units -- -- -- -- --

30.0-59.9 Units 79 111 122 90 86

18.0-29.9 Units 81 86 92 77 69

12.0-17.9 Units -- -- -- -- --

Total Certificates 160 197 214 167 155

Total Awards 600 685 833 872 877


200 | P a g e

Many students earn more than one award in any given year. The table below shows that the number of students that have received an award has increased by 33 percent since 2010-11.

Table 367: Number of Students Receiving Awards by Type, 2010-2015

The table below shows the number of students who receive a degree or a certificate, as required for the ACCJC Annual Report. This table simply sums the “Degree Only” or “Certificate Only” categories respectively with the “Both” category in the previous table (e.g., in 2010-11, 301 students received only a degree while 73 earned a degree and a certificate: 301+73 = 374).

Table 368: Number of Students Receiving Awards (ACCJC Annual Report), 2010-2015

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

Degree Only 301 315 353 432 461

Certificate Only 63 70 56 70 60

Both Degree & Certificate 73 77 103 70 61

Total Unduplicated Students 437 462 512 572 582

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

Total Unduplicated Degree 374 392 456 502 522

Total Unduplicated Certificate 136 147 159 140 121

Total Unduplicated Students 437 462 512 572 582


201 | P a g e

Table 369: Number of Students Receiving Degrees by Race/Ethnicity, 2010-2015

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15Five-Year

Average

African American 5.7% 5.9% 4.2% 3.7% 5.1% 4.8%(n = 21) (n = 23) (n = 19) (n = 18) (n = 26) (n = 107)


Asian 4.0% 5.4% 2.4% 2.8% 2.0% 3.2%(n = 15) (n = 21) (n = 11) (n = 14) (n = 10) (n = 71)

Filipino 1.9% 3.3% 2.2% 1.4% 1.8% 2.1%(n = 1 to 9) (n = 13) (n = 10) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 46)

Hispanic 19.9% 24.9% 25.4% 26.0% 33.1% 26.3%(n = 74) (n = 97) (n = 115) (n = 128) (n = 169) (n = 583)


White 50.7% 44.9% 53.3% 50.2% 46.8% 49.2%(n = 188) (n = 175) (n = 241) (n = 247) (n = 239) (n = 1,090)


Unknown 10.5% 7.9% 4.2% 4.5% 2.5% 5.6%(n = 39) (n = 31) (n = 19) (n = 22) (n = 13) (n = 124)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 371) (n = 390) (n = 452) (n = 492) (n = 511) (n = 2,216)


202 | P a g e

Table 370: Number of Students Receiving Certificates by Race/Ethnicity, 2010-2015

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15Five-Year

Average

African American 6.7% 8.2% 4.5% 3.6% 4.2% 5.4%(n = 1 to 9) (n = 12) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 38)

American Indian N/A N/A N/A 0.7% N/A 0.1%(n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9)

Asian 3.0% 3.4% 5.1% 3.6% 3.4% 3.7%(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 26)

Filipino 3.0% 2.7% 1.3% 1.4% 3.4% 2.3%(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 16)

Hispanic 20.7% 23.8% 22.9% 24.3% 28.6% 23.9%(n = 28) (n = 35) (n = 36) (n = 34) (n = 34) (n = 167)

Pacific Islander 1.5% 2.0% 0.6% 0.7% N/A 1.0%(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9)

White 47.4% 46.9% 52.9% 53.6% 46.2% 49.6%(n = 64) (n = 69) (n = 83) (n = 75) (n = 55) (n = 346)

Two or more 4.4% 4.1% 8.3% 8.6% 12.6% 7.4%(n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 13) (n = 12) (n = 15) (n = 52)

Unknown 13.3% 8.8% 4.5% 3.6% 1.7% 6.4%(n = 18) (n = 13) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 45)

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(n = 135) (n = 147) (n = 157) (n = 140) (n = 119) (n = 698)


203 | P a g e

Transfers Transfer Rate (Student Success Scorecard)

The Transfer Rate data are derived from the completion cohorts in the Student Success Scorecard. The completion cohorts comprise of first time students in the system that earned at least six units (within six years of their first enrollments) and attempted any level of math or English within three years. The completion cohorts were then matched against the National Student Clearinghouse, CSU, and UC data files to find students enrolled in four year universities within six years of the time students first enrolled at the college.

Table 371: Transfer Rate Five-Year Trends by Race/Ethnicity

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test



Asian 38.7% 38.2% 39.4% 40.8% 27.3% 34.9% NO 1.04(n = 31) (n = 34) (n = 33) (n = 49) (n = 88) (n = 235)




White 36.9% 33.6% 38.6% 32.6% 30.4% 34.2% NO 1.02(n = 504) (n = 553) (n = 637) (n = 611) (n = 770) (n = 3,075)

Two or more NA NA NA NA 31.1% 31.1% NO* 0.93(n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 106) (n = 106)


Total 34.8% 33.3% 35.2% 33.4% 31.5% 33.5% 27.9%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Asian)


204 | P a g e

Table 372: Transfer Rate Five-Year Trends by Gender

Table 373: Transfer Rate Five-Year Trends by Age

Table 374: Transfer Rate Five-Year Trends by Disability Status

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Female 36.8% 38.2% 36.7% 37.4% 33.1% 36.3% NO 1.08(n = 506) (n = 607) (n = 692) (n = 799) (n = 832) (n = 3,436)

Male 33.0% 27.4% 33.0% 28.2% 29.5% 30.1% NO 0.90(n = 454) (n = 492) (n = 570) (n = 610) (n = 658) (n = 2,784)

Total 34.8% 33.3% 35.2% 33.4% 31.5% 33.5% 29.0%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Female)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

<20 years 38.2% 36.4% 38.6% 38.2% 40.9% 38.5% NO 1.15(n = 796) (n = 935) (n = 1,052) (n = 1,117) (n = 1,019) (n = 4,919)

20-24 years 28.3% 24.4% 27.0% 24.8% 21.9% 24.7% YES 0.74(n = 60) (n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 109) (n = 146) (n = 482)

25-39 years 18.3% 11.1% 16.9% 15.6% 10.6% 13.9% YES 0.41(n = 71) (n = 45) (n = 71) (n = 109) (n = 180) (n = 476)

40+ years 7.7% 8.7% 5.6% 5.5% 5.3% 6.0% YES 0.18(n = 39) (n = 46) (n = 54) (n = 91) (n = 169) (n = 399)

Total 34.8% 33.3% 35.2% 33.4% 31.5% 33.5% 30.8%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (< 20 years)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 34.5% 19.7% 21.9% 20.5% 12.8% 20.9% YES 0.63(n = 55) (n = 61) (n = 73) (n = 88) (n = 86) (n = 363)

No 34.8% 34.1% 36.0% 34.2% 32.6% 34.3% NO 1.02(n = 943) (n = 1,043) (n = 1,193) (n = 1,338) (n = 1,428) (n = 5,945)

Total 34.8% 33.3% 35.2% 33.4% 31.5% 33.5% 27.4%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Not DSPS)


205 | P a g e

Table 375: Transfer Rate Five-Year Trends by Economically Disadvantaged

Table 376: Transfer Rate Five-Year Trends by Veteran Status

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 32.3% 29.7% 28.0% 31.3% 26.8% 29.3% YES 0.87(n = 557) (n = 634) (n = 753) (n = 1,030) (n = 1,195) (n = 4,169)

No 37.9% 38.3% 45.6% 38.9% 49.2% 41.7% NO 1.24(n = 441) (n = 470) (n = 513) (n = 396) (n = 319) (n = 2,139)

Total 34.8% 33.3% 35.2% 33.4% 31.5% 33.5% 33.4%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (No Econ)

2005-06 to

2010-11

2006-07 to

2011-12

2007-08 to

2012-13

2008-09 to

2013-14

2009-10 to

2014-15

Five-Year

Average

80%

Test

Proportion

Test

Yes 36.1% 16.7% 37.0% 27.0% 40.0% 32.2% NO 0.96(n = 36) (n = 36) (n = 46) (n = 37) (n = 50) (n = 205)

No 34.7% 33.9% 35.1% 33.5% 31.2% 33.5% NO 1.00(n = 962) (n = 1,068) (n = 1,220) (n = 1,389) (n = 1,464) (n = 6,103)

Total 34.8% 33.3% 35.2% 33.4% 31.5% 33.5% 26.8%

(n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Non Vet)


206 | P a g e

Number of Transfers: CCCCO Methodology

The table below shows the number of students who transferred to a four-year institution after attending the College. For the UC and CSU transfer data, the table reflects the figures captured by the CCCCO from the UC and CSU systems respectively. Here, the transfer source institution is the community college where the student earned the most transferable units.

For the In-State Private (ISP) and Out of State (OOS) baccalaureate granting institutions, transfers in the 2009-10 academic year were captured from a series of aggregated first-time freshman cohorts (1993-94 to 2008-09) that completed at least 12 units while in the community college system. A student records match with the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) identifies the transfer baccalaureate granting institution.

Beginning with 1993-94 data, a series of first-time student cohorts was identified by academic year. First-time students are defined as individuals taking their initial credit course in the CCC system with no prior enrollments inside or outside the system. The students in these cohorts must have completed at least 12 units in the community college system at time of transfer. The community college identified in the report was where the student first completed a credit course. The transfers were identified by disaggregating the fifteen cohorts by academic year.

Table 377: Cuyamaca College Transfers by Institution Type, 2009-2015

Number of Transfers: GCCCD Methodology

In the next table, the students were included who attended Cuyamaca College and subsequently transferred to a four-year university within six years. Only students who completed three or more units at the college are included. Transfer data are provided by the National Student Clearinghouse. Students may have attended other colleges (in addition to Cuyamaca) prior to transferring to a four-year college.

Table 378: Cuyamaca College Transfers--GCCCD Fact Book, 2009-2015 (ACCJC Annual Report)

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

UC 38 51 51 61 65 57

CSU 196 349 141 227 226 247

ISP & OOS 249 229 224 241 244 220

483 629 416 529 535 524

Cuyamaca Transfers

Cuyamaca Total

20013-14 2014-15

Cuyamaca Transfers 1,153 1,450 976 1,067 1,088 1,133

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13


207 | P a g e

APPENDIX

Data Definitions Student Characteristics: GCCCD Research Database

Age, gender, and ethnicity of students are calculated from the college’s unduplicated headcount for the most recent academic year. The Students’ “Disability Status” is derived by whether or not they are reported having one or more disabilities. Students are classified as "Economically Disadvantaged" if they received a Board of Governor’s Waiver. Students that received their Veterans Benefits or received priority registration due to verified veteran status were classified as veterans. Students who brought in their county verified letter to the Financial Aid Office were classified as foster youth students.

Student Characteristics: Student Success Scorecard

Age, gender, and ethnicity of students are calculated from the college’s unduplicated headcount for the most recent academic year. The Students’ “Disability Status” is derived by whether or not they are reported having one or more disabilities. Students are classified as "Economically Disadvantaged" if they received a Board of Governor’s Waiver or PELL grant, are a CalWorks or Workforce Investment Act participant, or are a Department of Social Services client.

Preparation Rate

In addition to the student characteristics discussed above, the completion cohorts are disaggregated by whether or not the first-time students were “prepared” or “unprepared” for college work in math and/or English. If a student’s first attempted English class was below transfer level English (ENGL-120) or first attempted math course was below college level math (MATH-103/110), then the student was considered “unprepared.” Students must have attempted transfer level English and college level math or higher to be considered “prepared” (See table below).

Table 379: Definition of Prepared Students in the Student Success Scorecard

Math English Preparedness

Less than MATH-103/110 Less than ENGL-120 Unprepared

Less than MATH-103/110 ENGL-120 Unprepared

Less than MATH-103/110 No English Unprepared

MATH-103/110 or higher Less than ENGL-120 Unprepared

MATH-103/110 or higher ENGL-120 Prepared

MATH-103/110 or higher No English Prepared

No Math Less than ENGL-120 Unprepared

No Math ENGL-120 Prepared

No Math No English Not in cohort


208 | P a g e

Student Success Scorecard Cohorts

Table 380 provides concise definitions that will assist interpretations of the student success trends.

Table 380: Definitions of Student Success Scorecard Cohorts

* NOTE: Transfer-prepared students are those who successfully completed 60 UC/CSU transferrable units with a GPA >= 2.0.

Definitions Initial Cohort Outcomes Cohort

Completion Rate

First Time Student in the system in the starting

academic year that earned at least 6 units and

attempted any level of math or English within

three years.

Students who:

Earned a degree or certificate OR transferred to

a 4-year institution OR were transfer-prepared*

Persistence Rate




three years.

Students who attempted a credit course OR

completed a degree or certificate or transferred

to a four-year institution within the first three

consecutive major terms.

30+ Units Rate




three years.

Students who completed 30 or more units within

six years.

Remedial English Progress Rate

Students with a first attempt in an English course

below transfer level (cohort based on the

academic year of the first attempt).

Students who completed a college-level English

course.

Remedial Math Progress Rate

Students with a first attempt in an math course

below 2-4 levels below transfer level (cohort

based on the academic year of the first attempt).

Students who completed a college-level or one

level below transfer math course.

ESL Progress Rate

Students with a first attempt in an ESL course

below transfer level (cohort based on the

academic year of the first attempt).

Students who completed the ESL sequence or a

college-level ESL course.

CTE Completion Rate


academic year that completed a CTE course and

completed more than 8 units in a single discipline

within three years.

Students who:

Earned a degree or certificate OR transferred to

a 4-year institution OR were transfer-prepared*


209 | P a g e

Table 381 presents the cohort sizes for the 2009-10 student cohorts by college and student success metric. It is crucial to keep in mind that the sample sizes dwindle significantly the further the data is disaggregated, which means that making accurate inferences about the data will be problematic for some of the cohorts. Furthermore, it is important to note that the initial “completion cohorts” are the same for the following student success metrics: Completion Rates; Persistence Rates; and 30+ Unit Rates (see Table 380).

These particular cohorts are disaggregated by whether or not the first-time students attempted college level English or math (“Prepared”) or below transfer level English or math (2-4 levels below: “Remedial”). As shown by the table below, over 85 percent of the first-time students in the completion cohorts at Cuyamaca College began their college career “unprepared” for college level work, significantly more than the overall average for all of the San Diego County community colleges (75.7%) as well as the statewide average (75.3%)

Table 381: Initial Student Success Scorecard Cohorts by College

Remedial

English Cohorts

Remedial

Math Cohorts

ESL

Cohorts

CTE

Cohorts

2009-10 Cohorts N % Prepared N N N N

Cuyamaca College 1,514 13.9% 1,152 742 302 989

Grossmont College 2,923 18.8% 2,997 1,595 513 1,583

SD City College 2,393 11.6% 1,648 2,634 233 1,778

SD Mesa College 2,366 26.4% 1,310 1,981 190 1,972

SD Miramar College 1,148 25.8% 942 892 185 1,714

Southwestern College 3,620 21.0% 1,495 3,588 671 1,546

Palomar College 3,967 30.2% 2,269 3,072 313 2,369

MiraCosta College 1,857 48.5% 848 1,444 169 1,396

SD Average 2,474 24.3% 1,583 1,994 295 1,668

Statewide Average 202,075 24.7% 169,728 177,442 31,552 140,328

Completion

Cohorts


Documents

Cuyamaca College 2016 Key Performance Indicators · Cuyamaca College 2016 Key Performance Indicators Office of Research, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness April 26, 2017 Grossmont-Cuyamaca