36
David Eubanks Director of Planning, Assessment, and Information Services [email protected] Coker College Hartsville, South Carolina Assessing The Elephant

David Eubanks Director of Planning, Assessment, and Information Services [email protected] Coker College Hartsville, South Carolina Assessing The Elephant

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

David EubanksDirector of Planning, Assessment, and Information Services

[email protected]

Coker CollegeHartsville, South Carolina

Assessing The

Elephant

map

G oal Test

C om plexityDialogue

A ssessing FA CS

The Goal

The College's goal is to graduate students with the ability to think analytically and

creatively, and to write and speak effectively.

The Unmoved Mover

[I]t is imperative […] to avoid narrow definitions of student learning or excessively standardized measures of student achievement.

The Unmoved Mover

Collegiate learning is complex, and the evidence used to investigate it must be similarly authentic and contextual.

The Unmoved Mover

But to pass the test of public credibility […] the evidence of student learning outcomes used in the accreditation process must be rigorous, reliable, and understandable.

All CHEA quotes are from: http://www.chea.org/pdf/StmntStudentLearningOutcomes9-03.pdf

public credibility

map

G oal Test

C om plexityDialogue

A ssessing FA CS

The question

The question

“Can Stanislav write effectively?”

should be answered in language that is rigorous, reliable, and understandable.

“…the meaning of a word is its usage in the language…”

-Wittgenstein

language

Context and perspective

A

B

C

D

map

G oal Test

C om plexityDialogue

A ssessing FA CS

Power of dialogue

Example: If we want to distinguish between 128 possibilities (where n = 7),

• Monologue requires 127 questions;

• Dialogue requires 7.

map

G oal Test

C om plexityDialogue

A ssessing FA CS

Complexity vs. reliability

Example: arithmetic

13 + 5 = 18 ?

This can be assessed with high reliability and high validity because it’s algorithmic.

Example: Turing Test

The Turing Test for Machine Intelligence:

If a computer, on the basis of its written replies to questions, could not be distinguished from a human respondent, then ‘fair play’ would oblige one to say that it must be ‘thinking’.

-Quoted from Alan Turing: The Enigma, by Andrew Hodges

map

G oal Test

C om plexityDialogue

A ssessing FA CS

Assessment as a Tire gauge

We can all agree that the tire pressure is about 30 psi.

Assessment as telescope

You don’t know what you’ll discover when you build the telescope, but we can create language to describe it.

map

G oal Test

C om plexityDialogue

A ssessing FA CS

Just The Facs, ma’am

The Faculty Assessment of Core Skills (FACS)

• Mission-based (effective writing, etc.)

• Rubrics in course syllabi

• Evaluation of authentic evidence each term

• Aggregation of results into group perception

features

• Uses authentic data in context

• Uses full perceptive ability of experts

• Fosters dialogue among students, faculty

• Creates a “Wittgensteinlich” language

• Has high prima fascia validity

• Has measurable reliability

• Is “low stakes”, reducing rater bias

Web survey

2003-2006 data

• 11,770 responses

• 1743 of 2054 traditional students (85%)

• Correlation with grades = .64

More Validity

Writing by Class and Library Use

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

Fall 05 Fall 04 Fall 03 Fall 02

Start Term

Avg

. W

riti

ng

Sco

re

> Library

< Library

Inter-rater Reliability

Analytical 50% on 820 studentsCreative 53% on 691 studentsWriting 50% on 799 studentsSpeaking 54% on 646 students

Probability of matching ratings between two raters for same student and skill:

Longitudinal DATA

Core Skills Over Four Years

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Semester

Assessed

Level

Writing

Speaking

THE matthew effect

Distributions

2005-6 FACS Average Distribution

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Performance level

Fra

ctio

n o

f cl

ass

Fresh

Soph

Jr

Sr

Class effectiveness

Effective Speaking

-0.20

-0.10

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5

COM 101

Other

Student/Advisor Report

AvgOfA AvgOfC AvgOfW AvgOfS1.29 1.25 1.14 1.50

Student has 104 Credits (about seven semesters)

Comparison group averages:

1.9, 1.8, 1.8, 1.9, respectively.

Program report

FEEDBACK AS Assessment

Contact Terri Flateby at [email protected]

Is this effective writing?