Declaration of Individual Sovereignty

8/13/2019 Declaration of Individual Sovereignty

1/9

Declaration of individual sovereignty

I Ed Curtis, A legal citizen of the United States do hereby declare mylegal and rightful individual sovereignty from any Government and its

agencies that are in tyranny. Any law that is contrary to the Constitutionis null and void.The Constitution and its attachments, including the Federalist papers,The Bill of rights, and the Declaration of independence Lay forth theduties of the people to protect themselves and each other from domesticencroachment on liberties and lives.Federalist# 46 James Madison They must be told that the ultimateauthority, Wherever the derivative may be found resides in the people

alone and that it will not depend merely on the comparative ambition oraddress of the different Governments whether either, or which of them,will be able to enlarge its sphere of Jurisdiction at the expense of theother.Federalist # 49 It is the reason, alone, of the public, alone that ought tocontrol and regulate the Government. The people and the Constitutionare bound together so that one may protect the other then both can

protect the country.Therefore, I give myself the duty to protect and defend both me, my the

public, My government and my country. I will not obey any law orunlawful order. I reserve the right to live free with and with all myfreedoms.I reserve the right to keep and bear arms for my protection fromencroachments. and I will use my arms in the event that I am illegallyencroached upon.I will join the people to rid any and all corruption to restore order and

protect the people.

I will resist, revolt, unite and fight to regain my Country.Hereby , I declare my sovereignty as prescribed by the ConstitutionEd Curtis924 5th St. S.Fargo, N.D.This is for you and Birch Burdick 701-241-5728 Michael Montplaisir

If you get a hold of me I will send them in word for your remodel and use! ndpow32417@ gmail, yahoo, or gmx.c


2/9

We were warned in the bible to not sell our birthright BUT WE DID ANYWAY.

A Birthright Sold For PottageBy Christopher Holloman Hansen

There is a well known story in the Bible concerning two brothers, Esau and Jacob, the twin sonsof Isaac. Esau was the eldest son and had the birthright from his father. He came in from a fieldand was faint with hunger. His brother, Jacob had cooked red pottage of lentiles but would notgive any to Esau saying, Sell me this day thy birthright. And Esau said he was at the point ofdeath so what good was the birthright at that moment. Then Jacob did something that was, veryinteresting he said, Swear to me this day. And Esau did swear and sold his birthright to Jacob.(See Gen. Chapter 5.)

There is another loss of a birthright in the Bible. It makes the sale of Esaus birthright pale incomparison for this was the loss of the birthright of an entire nation. It is documented in FirstSamuel Chapter 8. Here we find the People of Israel rejecting liberty and demanding slavery.They rejected responsibility and requested subjection. They rejected their God and demanded anearthly master. They rejected their birthright to obtain a little temporary security. They becameservants to another instead of masters of themselves. They Voluntarily gave up their liberty,their property and the liberty of their children so they could have the benefits of being likeother nations and so the king could go out before them, and fight their battles.

Could there be anything more foolish than what the Israelites had done?

Our Founding Fathers did just the opposite of the ancient Israelites. Instead of selling theirposterity into bondage they took upon themselves personal responsibilities and pledged theirlives, fortunes and sacred honor to the establishment of liberty not only for themselves but theirposterity. The concern for their posterity was made evident in two major documents of times:

In 1775 the Continental Congress wrote: Honour, justice, and humanity, forbid us tamely to

surrender that freedom which we received from our gallant ancestors, and which our innocentposterity have a right to receive from us. We cannot endure the infamy and guilt of resigningsucceeding generations to that wretchedness which inevitably awaits them, if we basely entailhereditary bondage upon them.

And from the preamble of the Constitution we find: We the People of the United States, inOrder to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide forthe common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty toourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of

America.

These honorable ideas of the Founders have been abandoned today in favor of the faulty wisdom

of the apostate Israelites. We, as a nation, have become more concerned about our own needs andtemporary securities, like, Esau than the far reaching sacrifices of George Washington andSamuel Adams. The World War II generation not only did not mind the infamy and guilt ofresigning succeeding generations to that wretchedness which inevitably awaits them, if we baselyentail hereditary bondage upon them but call hereditary bondage a sacred trust. This


3/9

hereditary bondage is said to be the most popular program of the federal government. It is calledSocial Security.

All of the blame, however, can not be placed upon a single generation. While our nation, likeIsrael, sold its birthright for the so-called benefits of Social Security; Social Security is also a

personal sale of an Americans birthright. It is interesting to note that, like Esaus sale of hisbirthright to Jacob was sealed by an oath, the voluntary application for a Social Security numberalso requires an oath. You sign your application swearing that the information you gave is true.Most Americans do not know if the information is true or even what it means to them personally.

Most Americans do not realize that there is no law requiring them to obtain a Social Securitynumber. It is an application. You or your parents must apply. Foreigners must have a number in

order to work but that requirement is not placed upon Union State Citizens in the Social Securityact.

There are however requirements for Social Security numbers if you want to be given a benefitfrom the federal government. Not even unalienable rights secured by the Bill of Rights areprotected if you receive a benefit because you voluntarily requested the benefit and so you gaveup your rights, the government did not take it from you. This was made clear in BOWEN v.ROY, 476 U.S. 693 (1986) where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled:

"The question presented is whether the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment compelsthe Government to accommodate a religiously based objection to the statutory requirements thata Social Security number be provided by an applicant seeking to receive certain welfare benefits

and that the States use these numbers in administering the benefit programs.

The importance of the Social Security number to these matching techniques is illustrated by thefacts of this case... Appellees may not use the Free Exercise Clause to demand Government

benefits, but only on their own terms, particularly where that insistence works a demonstrabledisadvantage to the Government in the administration of the programs.

The Appellees sold their birthright for a government benefit.

How has all this happened?Why do Americans believe that Social Security numbers are required?What do you become when you apply for Social Security number?The answer to the first question is: By a long train of deceptions and misrepresentations by thevery government officials that had sworn to protect and uphold the Constitution of the UnitedStates. Research has shown that treaties created Social Security system with other nations in an

attempt to bypass the restriction in the Constitution.

The answer to question two is: Americans have been lied to by their government servants that

have believed the lies told to them by people above them in the chain of command. (They aredeceiving, and being deceived, See II Tim Chapter 3) Americans, instead of reading the lawthemselves, have listened to oral traditions created by tyrants that seek to usurp authority andsteal your birthright and unalienable rights. Thomas Jefferson warned us of this when he said, Ifa nation expects to be ignorant and free, it expects what never was and never will be.


4/9

The answer to question three is two fold. The first part is easy. It is found in the United StatesCode Title 5 in Chapter 552a:

(13) the term Federal personnel means officers and employees of the Government of the

United States, members of the uniformed services (including members of the ReserveComponents), individuals entitled to receive immediate or deferred retirement benefits under anyretirement program of the Government of the United States (including survivor benefits).

Did you get that? If you are an individual entitled to receive immediate or deferred retirementbenefits under ANY retirement program of the Government of the United States (includingsurvivor benefits) you are Federal personnel. Of course in order to be entitled you must have

a Social Security number. Even a one-day-old child with a Social Security number (applied forby its parents as trustees of their childs birthright) is entitled to survivor benefits and istherefore Federal personnel. Federal personnel are not necessarily protected by the Bill ofRights. A member of the Unites States military, for instance, does not have the right to remainsilent. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is not authorized statutorily to investigate StateCitizens but they are authorized to investigate Federal personnel.

The answer to the second half of question three arises from a situation not foreseen within theframework of the Constitution. Oddly enough it is concerning something that does not reallyexist a citizen of the United States. The truth of this is well described in a California court casefrom 1855:

A citizen of any one of the States of the union, is held to be, and called a citizen of the UnitedStates, although technically and abstractly there is no such thing. To conceive a citizen of theUnited States who is not a citizen of some one of the States, is totally foreign to the idea, andinconsistent with the proper construction and common understanding of the expression as used in

the Constitution, which must be deduced from its various other provisions. The object then to beattained, by the exercise of the power of naturalization, was to make citizens of the respective

States. Ex Parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300

Now that you know what you are and are not, the question is why do you sign documents underoath that say you are a United States or U. S. citizen when technically and abstractly there is nosuch thing? This is very important because everyone that lives in areas under the jurisdiction ofthe United States and not within one of the union states are now called citizens of the UnitedStates by default as their existence was not foreseen or authorized in the Constitution. Such landthat would not become States nor sold to the federal government by the States but owned bycongress was not spoken of directly in the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson even questioned the

legitimacy of the Louisiana purchase but decided that it was within the treaty powers given to theUnited States Senate as they were the direct representatives of the States before the anti-constitutional 17th Amendment.

Thomas Jefferson understood that this land could only be held by the federal government asterritory until it could be adopted into the union of States.


5/9


6/9

without subjects which was your inheritance secured by the Founding Fathers by contractsknown as the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States of America.With this in mind consider also the following Maxims:

Time runs against the slothful and those who neglect their rights. Currit tempus contra desides et

sui juris contemptores.

An error not resisted is approved. Error qui non resistitur, approbatur.

To be able to know is the same as to know. This maxim is applied to the duty of every one toknow the law. Idem est scire aut scire debet aut potuisse.

In law none is credited unless he is sworn. All the facts must when established, by witnesses, beunder oath or affirmation. In judicio non creditur nisi juratis. (Have you ever wondered why youhave to sign IRS and SSA forms under oath but the government servants almost never do?)

The following quotes are taken from the very enlightening United States Supreme Court case ofDOWNES v. BIDWELL, 182 U.S. 244 (1901). The author highly recommends that the readerstudies this long and diverse case.

It is sufficient to observe in relation to these three fundamental instruments, that it can nowherebe inferred that the territories were considered a part of the United States.

The 13th Amendment to the Constitution, prohibiting slavery and involuntary servitude within

the United States, or in any place subject to their jurisdiction, is also significant as showing thatthere may be places within the jurisdiction of the United States that are no part of the Union.

Upon the other hand, the 14th Amendment, upon the subject of citizenship, declares only that

all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, arecitizens of the United States, and of the state wherein they reside. Here there is a limitation to

persons born or naturalized in the United States, which is not extended to persons born in anyplace subject to their jurisdiction.

As the only judicial power vested in Congress is to create courts whose judges shall hold theiroffices during good behavior, it necessarily follows that, if Congress authorizes the creation ofcourts and the appointment of judges for a limited time, it must act independently of theConstitution and upon territory which is not part of the United States within the meaning of theConstitution.

The power to make needful rules and regulations would certainly not authorize anythinginconsistent with the Constitution if it applied to the territories. Certainly no such court could becreated within a state, except under the restrictions of the judicial clause. We are therefore of

opinion that the island of Porto Rico is a territory appurtenant and belonging to the United States,but not a part of the United States within the revenue clauses of the Constitution...

Alaska contained an express provision excluding from citizenship the uncivilized native tribes,and it has been nowhere contended that this condition of exclusion was inoperative because of


7/9

the want of power under the Constitution in the treaty-making authority to so provide, whichmust be the case if the limitation on the treaty- making power, which is here asserted, be wellfounded. The treaty concerning Alaska, therefore, adds cogency to the conception established byevery act of the government from the foundation, that the condition of a treaty, when expressly orimplied ratified by Congress, becomes the measure by which the rights arising from the treaty are

to be adjusted.

In conclusion: When you abandon your union State Citizenship by inaction or oath and become aU.S. or United States citizen you sell your birthright of personal sovereignty for the benefits ofFederal citizenship. You reject the security of God for Social Security. You become a subject ofthe U.S. congress, subject to their whims and no longer have Constitutionally secured rights thatrestrict congress. You lose the right to Article III court and are subjected to territorial courts that

need not follow the Constitution. You are no longer a part of We the People that established andmaintain the God given Constitution but a native inhabitant restricted by treaty. You reject theGod of this nation, Jesus Christ, and place as your master your former servant, the federalgovernment. In the words of George Washington, Government... Like fire, it is a dangerousservant and a fearful master. Is your current master not fearful? Do you not fear the IRS? Is itnot time to reject this fraud and theft of State Citizenship and regain your sovereignty underChrist?

You have the right and duty to yourself and posterity to reestablish this birthright of individualresponsibility and liberty under Christ and to reclaim with sacrifice and assertion yourunalienable rights given by God which are not subject to any earthly government or treaty.Honor, justice, and humanity, forbid you tamely to surrender that freedom which you received

from your gallant ancestors, and which your innocent posterity have a right to receive from you.Or can you endure the infamy and guilt of resigning succeeding generations to that wretchednesswhich inevitably awaits them, if you basely entail hereditary bondage upon them?

To those of you that can endure the infamy and guilt through your support of or participation inSocial Security and socialism or even your inaction I leave you with the words of Samuel Adams.

If you love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animatingcontest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch downand lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you and may posterity forgetthat ye were our countrymen.

YOU FREAKS robbed me of 7 years of life, destroyed my business career, family, and life. YOUare thieves, liars and traitors to this country and the entire human race.I want you to know that all of you in this criminal N.D. Government are the worst war criminalsin the history of the entire human race, YOU are the dirtiest county of the dirtiest state of the

dirtiest country in all history. YOU may think you will get away with your WAR CRIMES butyou will not. YOU are by far, the most dangerous band of criminally insane sociopaths EVER.YOU shit on the people, the Constitution and and every man, women and child FORCED to pay

your way. How can you live with yourselves? I directly accuse you of ;Theft, breach of contract,Crimes against humanity, treason, kidnaping, attempted murder, and out right genocide, I ammaking my case to the people in hopes of rounding you ALL up and putting you in a place youcan not hurt anyone else, until you are brought to real justice. On such a scale as to be beyond allsanity, human decency, the law and this country, you prove yourselves traitors to the entire


8/9

human race. Dan will NOT pay you for your tax swindle, IF you people MURDER my brotherand try steal his home for not paying your EXTORTUNE, You had best MURDER everyone inmy family, and my news groups. YOU will NOT get away any other way. YOU ALL areFREAKS OF NATURE. When this country gets liberated FROM you, you all will be brought tojustice or justice will never have any meaning or deserve any respect. YOU ALL ARE NUTS.

Public Notice of TREASONEd ,Dan, Shane, Justin, and the entire Curtis Family.Sovereign Citizen Plaintiffsvs.ALL members of the N.D. legal, cops, judges, lawyers and buraratsAccused

Treason against the United States of AmericaViolation of Your Sworn OATH of Office

You. as a Public Officials, who has Sworn an Oath of Office, to Defend,Protect, and Preserve the Constitution for the united States ofAmerica against all enemies, both Foreign and Domestic, as well as itsCitizens, and to Honor it as the Supreme Law of the Land; defined byLaw as one owing Allegiance to the United States of America in yourposition of Public Trust.You failure to honor your Sworn Oath (documented by the within namedPlaintiff, in my book) fulfills the requirements of an Act of Treason as cited in

the United States Constitution, to wit: "in levying war against them[the States and "We the People"], or, in adhering to their enemies,giving them aid and comfort."TREASON, by law, is

punishable by the Death Penalty.

Thus, any violation one's Oath of Office, by those Sworn and paid toHonor the Constitution for the united States of America, is an overtact of treason against "We the People."Such acts are in contempt of the law, affecting other Public Servantswho may 'go along - to get along,' leading to the loss of confidencein Government and eventual corruption in Government. If lawlessnesscontinues un-reported and un-punished, tyranny becomes king andGovernment the Master.

If enough citizens, patriots, and Christians understand thistraditional love for Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness,traditional in America - this will not happen.

You. (the Accused, are now put on notice by this letter, that youract(s) of Treason are now part of the Public Record.This letter is delivered to you, the Accused, showing that there is alegal file being prepared for your prosecution. The responsibility todocument Your Act(s) of Treason rests with the Plaintiff. The


9/9

Plaintiff has a legal obligation to make your Act(s) of Treason knownto Government Officials and WE THE PEOPLE. (18 USC Section 4) and the moralresponsibility to post this Notice in public places near your place ofbusiness, or in the areas of your residence, as a Public Service. Alllocal media will, also, in this process, be fully informed.

For Your information, this letter will be entered as a Court Exhibit,in addition to other evidence, to document your Act(s) of Treasonagainst "We the People," when formal charges and proceedings are filedagainst you. An Act of Treason against one individual, by another - isan act against all American Citizens.Signature: Edward D. CurtisAddress:924 5th ST. S.

Date:_Sunday, March 04, 2012City, : Fargo,STATE OF:North DakotaCOUNTY OF: Cass1st witness:_Dan Curtis2nd witness:_Shane Curtis3rd witness:_Justin Curtis If you wish, I will bring in 1000 names as witnessI demand you LAWFULLY file this on record as a matter of law, your duty and record

Documents

Declaration of Individual Sovereignty