Upload
siddu76
View
40
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
dental implants
Citation preview
2/13/2014 Dental Implants -Part - 1 by Dr. Shahid Ppt Presentation
http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/drshahidkhan-1834164-dental-implants-part-dr-shahid/ 1/7
Go Premium | Sign Up | Sign In | Take a Tour | Help
Home Browse Upload PowerPoint Presentations Search Presentations GOPowerPoint Templates
drshahidkhan
Share Add to Flag Embed
Views: 1523 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved
Presentation Description
My thesis topic
Dental Implants -part - 1 by Dr. Shahid
View More Presentations
Implant SimulationsBy: funnyside
ANATOMIA DENTALBy: fmolina
Los Angeles DentalImplants – What is the
Cost of Dental Implants?By: drkezian
Trigeminal Nerve-bydr.shahidBy: aSGuest84693
Dental Implants - Dr ArthurA. Kezian DDSBy: drkezian
Dental Care in Indiadelivering the best Dental
ImplantsBy: Dental013
finalAutoimmuneDiseases by-
DR.SHAHIDBy: drshahidkhan
Edmonds Dental Implants
at Dayton Dental,Edmonds, WABy: hu8035
Dentist Austin TX | DentalImplants Austin TX |Dental PracticeBy: PerioHealthAustin
Getting dental implantsfrom the best dentists via
Dental TourismBy: sheropova
Tags
Implants Shahid
Presentation Statistics
Views on authorSTREAM:1273
Views from mobile site : 240
Views from Embeds:10
www.facebook.com - 8 views
Others: 2
Download
2/13/2014 Dental Implants -Part - 1 by Dr. Shahid Ppt Presentation
http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/drshahidkhan-1834164-dental-implants-part-dr-shahid/ 2/7
Comments
Presentation Transcript
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
History….:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
IMPLANTS MODERATOR: Dr. Neelakamal Sir Presenter: Dr. Shahid
Introduction History And Evolution Of Implants Terminology & Definitions Classifications &Implant Systems Ideal Properties Of Implants Indications & Contraindications Advantages & Disadvantages
Evaluation Of Bone- Divisions & Density Diagnosis & Pt. Selection -History -Examination -Radiographic Assesment -
Study Models Contents:
Part-2 Surgical placement Ossiointegration Healing Period Prosthetic phase Implant
Maintainace Implant Complications & Management Special consideration- full Mouth implants supported, ZygomaImplants Conclusion Future References
Introduction: Dental implants are designed to provide a foundation for replacement of teeththat look, feel, and function like natural teeth. Reconstruction with dental implants has changed considerably. Rather
than merely focusing on the tooth/teeth to be replaced, today’s implant practitioners considers a broad and complex
set of interwoven factors before formulating an implant treatment plan.
History Of Implants 1. Ancient Era - 1000 A.D 2. Medieval Period (1000-1799 A.D) 3. The
Foundation Period (1800-1910) The Endosseous Oral Implantology Truly Began In The 19 th Century. 4. PremodernEra ( 1910-1930) 5.The Dawn Of The Modern Era (1935-1978) A.D
History…. 2500 BC - Ancient Egyptians - gold ligature. 500 BC - Etruscan population - gold bandsincorporating pontics.
500 BC - Phoenician population – gold wire. 300 AD - Phoenician population - Carved Ivoryteeth. 600 AD - Mayan population - Implantation of pieces of shell. Albucasis de Condue ( 936- 1013 A.D) an Arab
surgeon use ox bone to replace missing teeth described the transplantation procedures . .
1700 - John Hunter - Transplanting the teeth. 1911 - Greenfield – Irridoplatinum basket
soldered with 24 carat gold.
THE DAWN OF THE MODERN ERA 1935-1978 A.D. The modern era of implant dentistry
most definitely began in the late1930s with the work of Venable, Strock , Dahl , Gershkoff & Goldberg . Venable in 1937
developed the cast Co- Cr- Mo alloy known as Vitallium . 1937 Adams- Introduced submerged implants with ball headscrews. In 1939 Alvin & Strock used the Venable screw type implant .
In 1938 Stock placed the threaded vitallium implant into the extraction socket, the first longterm endosseous implant. It remained firm & asymptomatic for nearly 17 years .
1943 –Dahl -sub periosteal type of implant In 1947, Formiggini developed a single helixwire spiral implants made of stainless steel or tantalum. Two ends of the wire were soldered together to form a post
or neck.
Chercheve Modified it by increasing the length of the neck & double helix out of vitallium . In
1950 Lee’s - design i.e central narrow post with extensions .
1960 – Linkow developed blade Implants Late 1970s and Early 1980s - Tatum - custom
blade implants of Titanium alloy. Early 1980s -Tatum - Titanium root form implant
Add a comment
Facebook social plugin
7 comments
Hassan Sadek · Cairo, Egypt
great informative and educational presentation, it would be very useful as a reference. please sendme this presentation my e mail [email protected]
Reply · · Like · December 30, 2013 at 8:47am2
Santosh Nelogi · SDM
good one , can i have ur ppt .please send me on [email protected]
Reply · · Like · November 23, 2013 at 7:34pm1
Manar Magdy · Works at Sinai University-Faculty of Dentistry@
please send me this ppt to my e-mail ( [email protected])
Reply · Like · December 27, 2013 at 4:45am
Manar Magdy · Works at Sinai University-Faculty of Dentistry@
very good
Reply · Like · December 27, 2013 at 4:44am
dr.hanan alasad (signed in using Hotmail)
nice presentation please send me this ppt to my e-mail([email protected])
Reply · Like · December 10, 2013 at 9:47am
Moe Abaza
Please send me this ppt [email protected] , Thanx
Reply · Like · November 25, 2013 at 1:05pm
Ankush Rajput · Software Developer at Graebert India
Please send me this ppt at [email protected] if possible....it can be more helpful for me ...
Reply · Like · October 11, 2013 at 4:12am
2/13/2014 Dental Implants -Part - 1 by Dr. Shahid Ppt Presentation
http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/drshahidkhan-1834164-dental-implants-part-dr-shahid/ 3/7
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
Classifications & Implant Systems :
Epiosteal Implant:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
Various Implant Systems:
Branemark USA, Inc:
BRANEMARK SYSTEM COMPONENTS :
1978 – Bren mark in North America started 2 stage threaded implant placement. After
1980s –hollow basket Core vent implant - Screw vent implant - Screw vent implant with Hydroxyapatite -coating implant
with titanium plasma spray
TERMINOLOGY: Implant (GPT 8 ) Any object or material such as an alloplastic substance
or other tissue, which is partially or completely inserted or grafted into the body for therapeutic, diagnostic, prosthetic orexperimental purposes. Dental Implant : A prosthetic device made of alloplastic material implanted into the oral
tissues beneath the mucosal or/ & periosteal layer &/or within the bone to provide retention & support for a fixed or
removable dental prosthesis. A substance that is placed into or / & upon the jaw bone to support a fixed or removabledental prosthesis.
Implantology: Term historically coined as the study or science of planning and restoringdental implants. Implant system (GPT, 1993): Dental implant components that are designed mate together and can
represent a specific concept & inventor. It consists of the necessary parts and instruments to complete the implant
body placement and abutment components. Osseointegration: The apparent direct attachment or connection ofosseous tissue to an inert, alloplastic material without intervening connective tissue.
Classifications & Implant Systems Based on Implant placement within thetissues Epiosteal exp- Subperiosteal Endosteal - Root form Implants - Bladevent/plate form Implant - Ramus frame
Implant Transosteal / Transosseus /Transmandibular/Staple bone implant Mucosal Inserts
Epiosteal Implant It is a dental implant structure that covers almost the entire crestal surface of the
maxillary and mandibular residual alveolar bone under the soft tissue periosteum. It is a dental implant that receives
its primary bone support by resting on the bone. So new bone will grow around the implant. Example- SubperiostealImplant
SUBPERIOSTEAL IMPLANTS first placement Goldberg and Gershkoff (1949). covers thealmost entire crestal surface of ridge, with the four to six posts protruding out through gingiva and on it the complete
denture will be attached . for atrophic mandible. Maxillary subperiosteal implants have higher failure rate and was not
done routinely.
Endosteal Implant: In 1930 Strock placed first. It is a dental implant that extends into the
basal bone for support. Only 1 cortical plate is involve. Root form Plate form Used over a vertical column of bone. -usedfor horizontal column of bone which is flat and narrow facial lingual direction.
ROOT FORM IMPLANTS Advantages: Adaptability to multiple intra oral location. Uniformprecise Implant site preparation. Types of root form implants- Based on surgical procedure Two staged Single staged
Based on surface Press-fit/Non-threaded Screw type/Threaded Hollow basket implant
Blade vent / Plateform implants Introduced by Linkon in (1967). This form of implant uses a
horizontal dimension of base and is flat and narrow in faciolingual dimension. These are one stage system.
Indication: In distal extension cases that offer sufficient depth of bone to avoid damage to maxillary Sinus and themandibular canal. In long inter tooth span, which are not restorable, by fixed prosthodontics. completely edentulous
arches where four implants are used.
Contraindications: As abutments for a removable prosthesis, except in complete arch
overdenture. As a single tooth replacement unless these implants are splinted to at least one and preferably two
adjacent natural teeth. Disadvantages Bone necrosis due to large amount of bed preparation. Fibrous ankylosis ofimplant due to base necrosis from high temperature during implant bed preparation and immediate loading. Difficulty
to prepare a precise slot for blade placement. Large areas of bone lost when these blades are to be removed.
Ramus frame implants Developed by HD Roberts and RA Roberts in 1965. Used to aid in
retention and stability of mandibular full dentures. One piece endosseous implant that uses tripodal mechanical
support in the mandible (the ramii and the bony symphysis ).. It can be bent and shaped without difficulty. IndicationsPatients with h/o mandibular bone resorption. Patients inability to wear dentures. Patients with knife edged ridges,
high labial muscles, mucosal attachments and high convex to flat symphyseal areas with fibrous and flabby tissue.
Transosteal implants / Mandibular Staples/ Transcortical implants A dental implant thatpenetrates both cortical plates and passes through entire thickness of the alveolar bone. indicated in atropic anterior
mandible, where root form implants further compromises the strength of the jaw.
Advantages: Stock implants usually fits all mandibles. No special preoperative surgical or
preprosthetic preparation Short time required with minimal armamentarium Immediate wearing of denture with early to
limited function and chewing Stability adequate Adequate high success rate.
Mucosal inserts These are attachments in dentures to provide added stability and retention
. This technique was introduced by Dahl in 1943 ,modified by Lew 1957,Izikowitz 1961, Trainin 1962, Cronin 1970 . In
1973 Wein & Judy introduced a newly designed mucosal inserts that had more satisfactory design and health .
Advantagenous for providing retention Complete maxillary dentures . Distal extensionpartial dentures. Large bulb obturator. Usually 14 inserts are used for dentures. Disadvantages Retention is not
adequate Soreness due to ridge resorption
Other Classifications Based on Surface characteristics: Titanium plasma- sprayed Coating
Sand Blasting- Surface Etching Laser Induced surface roughening Hydroxyapatite coating Depending on function
Cosmetic cannot withstand masticatory forces Semifunctional can withstand along with mucoperiosteal. Functionalcan withstand masticatory load and transfer to bone
Based on Faundation : Implant supported Implant assisted Based on Retention of
prosthesis: Removable Fixed- screw retained, cement retained
PARTS:
Various Implant Systems Branemark system Developed from the pioneering work of Prof.
Per-Ingvar Branemark who introduced the term osteointegration . ( 1960)
33 Branemark USA , Inc Advantages ADA full acceptance (edentulous) and provisional
acceptance for all other uses. Longest documented research. Relatively simple surgery. Excellent educationavailability. Disadvantages Some sponsors do not allow general practitioners to take surgery course . Most expensive
system. Has only pure titanium implants.
BRANEMARK SYSTEM COMPONENTS FIXTURE – pure titanium with
machined threads . The top of the fixture has hexagonal design & threads .. The apical portion tapered with four vertical
notches. COVER SCREW- seals the coronal potion of fixture during the interim period.
2/13/2014 Dental Implants -Part - 1 by Dr. Shahid Ppt Presentation
http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/drshahidkhan-1834164-dental-implants-part-dr-shahid/ 4/7
PowerPoint Presentation:
FRIALIT Implant system:
ITI Implant System:
Other popular cylindrical endosseous dental implant systems :
Core-Vent (CORE-VENT Corp.):
Interpore IMZ:
Steri OSS Denar Corp:
Stryker Precision Stryker Inc:
Ideal Properties of implants:
Indications :
General Medical Contraindications :
Relative Contraindications:
PowerPoint Presentation:
Intraoral Contraindications:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
BONE EVALUATION :
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
ABUTMENT - -made of titanium in a cylinder shape. the apical portion has hexagonalshape to fit the coronal portion of fixture. ABUTMENT SCREW – insert through the abutment & threads into the fixture to
connect the two components. GOLD CYLINDER- made of Au , Pl, Pd. It is machined to fit the coronal portion of the
abutment. It becomes integral part of final prosthesis. GOLD SCREW –inserted through the gold cylinder & threads
into the abutment screw to connect the gold cylinder & abutment.
FRIALIT Implant system 1n 1974 Dr. Willi Schulte developed Frialit 1 also known asTubingen Implants World’s first root analog system. Advantages Optimum stabilization of the implant abutment
interface. Anti-rotational connection between the abutment and the implant. Clear and secure positioning of the
abutment on the implant. No possibility of screw breaking or loosening. Minimum risk of soft tissue perforation.
ITI Implant System International team of implantology Types – Hollow cylinder, Hollow screw Solid
screw Single stage and 2 stage versions Advantages: The microgap between the primary and secondary componentsis supragingival – good peri -implant hygiene. The construction of the implant body is such that no second stage
surgery for uncovering it is required.
38 Other popular cylindrical endosseous dental
implant systems
39 Core -Vent (CORE-VENT Corp.) Advantages Extensive implant options Extensive
Prosthodontics options Simple surgery Lower cost Good education High popularity Sells "Branemark" clone at lower
cost Disadvantages Complexity of options (both surgical and prosthodontic) requires good organization
40 Interpore IMZ Advantages ADA provisional acceptance for all uses. Relatively simple surgery
Moderate cost Good education Provides simulated periodontal ligament intramobile eIement - IMZ) if desired Pioneerin research on hydroxylapatite coating for faster integration Tissue recession on HA coating leaves polished surface
Disadvantages Intramobile element (IMZ) requires replacement on annual basis
41 Steri OSS Denar Corp Advantages Prosthodontics acceptability good Company will replace
implants that fail Simple surgery Good education Moderate cost Disadvantages Suggests very low hand piece rpm
(300 rpm), can get higher rpm if desired
42 Stryker Precision Stryker Inc Advantages Moderate cost Relatively simple surgery
Hand auger ostectomy is kind biologically Mechanical retention good Disadvantages Fair prosthodontic acceptability
Education availability fair Prosthodontic esthetics can be difficult because of some head designs Lacks ADA
acceptance
Ideal Properties of implants According to Branemark, 1969 & Brunski, 1988 : It should be
biocompatible (Not produce foreign body reaction / response). Non-allergenic. Non-carcinogenic. Should be
sterilizable . Resistant to strain. It should be able to moulded to specifically required forms. It would be ideal for the
implant to be integrated with surrounding bone and soft tissues. Inserted with atraumatic surgical technique. Placed
with initial stability Not functionally loaded during the healing period of 4 to 6 months.
Indications Patients who are unable to wear removable dentures and have adequate bone for
replacement of dental implants. Complete or partial edentulism . Painful / loose dentures. Bone resorption leading to
lack of stability of denture. Posterior edentulism where FPD is not possible. Orthodontic skeletal anchorage( micro
/mini implants). Cranio and maxillofacial defects either- Congenital Acquired
General Medical Contraindications Absolute Contraindications : Systemicdiseases such as developing cancer and Aids. Even HIV positive patients should not to be considered. Cardiac
diseases – patients with heart valve replacements and recent infarcts. Deficient hemostasis and blood dyscrasias.
Disorders involving erythrocytes – Anemia. Anticoagulant medication or any medication leading to impaired
hemostasis. Psychological diseases may carry potential risks. Uncontrolled infections.
Relative Contraindications Diabetes. Irradiation of the Jaws. - Specifically if the jaw hasbeen exposed to irradiation over the level of 50 Gy . (Sennerby & Rasmusson 2001, Lekholm Periodontology 2000, Vol.
33, 2003) Hyperbaric oxygen treatment preceding implant therapy, the failure rate can be reduced from 60% to about
5% . ( Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2006. Granstrom 1992) Reports have indicated a lower risk for failures if the pre-
operative irradiation has been less than 40 Gy and carried out two years or more prior to the implant placement.
Chemotherapy. If the implants are placed during medication or if the chemotherapy is given in combination with
irradiation higher failure rates have been indicated. (Wolfhardt et al 1996)
Smoking. If the patient stops smoking during the healing period, implants survival rate may
improve. (Bain 1996) Misuse of alcohol and drugs patients suffering from severe osteoporosis have been treated with
implants without developing any negative results in the long term. Robert A. Jaffin, INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC
IMPLANTS 2002;17:816–819) Friberg et al Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research,January2001,Sennerby &
Rasmusson 2001
Intraoral Contraindications No Pathologic conditions should be present. All Oral lesions,
including periodontal inflammation should be treated. Unfavorable intermaxillary relationships. Pathologic conditions
in alveolar bone. Pathologic alterations of Oral mucosa. Xerostomia- reduced salivary flow rate is a relative
contraindication for oral implantology. (Matukas 1998) Macroglossia. Unrestored teeth and poor oral hygiene.
Advantages Reduce the stress on the remaining teeth by offering independent support and
retention. Preserve natural teeth by avoiding the need to cut down adjacent teeth for conventional bridgework. Preserve
bone that results in loss of jaw height and the appearance of aging. Long-term data suggests that implants last longer
than conventional bridgework. Implants will allow to chew better and speak more clearly. Implant restorations are very
natural appearing and easy to clean and maintain.
Disadvantages A surgical procedure is necessary for implant placement. There may be
insufficient bone for implant placement. This may necessitate bone grafting and additional expense. While implant
fixtures (roots) have a 95% success rate, a porcelain crown placed on the implant may still fracture with time. Initial
implant expense may be costly but in the longterm is actually more cost-effective
Evaluation of Bone Divisons & density
BONE EVALUATION Available bone : is the amount of bone in the edentulous area considered
for implantation. it is measured in : width height length angulation crown : implant
Available bone height : crest of edentulous ridge to opposing landmarks . Max- Maxillary
canine Min.-Mandibular 1 st pre-molar Minimum bone height – long term survival - 10 mm Height requirementdepends on bone density .
Available bone width : once adequate height is available for implants – width is the primary
criteria width – facial & lingual plates at the crest Can be measured directly using bone callipers. –’ridge mapping’ By
2/13/2014 Dental Implants -Part - 1 by Dr. Shahid Ppt Presentation
http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/drshahidkhan-1834164-dental-implants-part-dr-shahid/ 5/7
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
BONE QUALITY: Lekholm and Zarb (1985) classified the bone quality into four classes :
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
Dental evaluation::
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
subtracting the sum of facial and palatal mucosal thicknesses from the width of the entire alveolar ridge, effective bone
width can be calculated ( Spiekermann 1987).
Available bone length : length – mesio distal for bone > 5 mm wide : min m - d : 7 mm
narrower ridge – 2 / more implants of smaller diameter Available bone angulation : Ideally it is aligned with the forces
of occlusion & is parallel to the long axis of prosthodontic restoration. Premolar region-10* 1 st Molar -15* 2 nd Molar-
20-25* For Wider ridge 30* is acceptable.
CROWN : IMPLANT : Affects appearance of the final prosthesis & the amount of momentforce on the implant & surrounding bone during occlusal loading. as the C: I increases the number of implants & / or
wider implants should be inserted to counteract the increase in stress. Most ideal – 1 : 2 More common – 1 : 1.5
Minimum requirement – 1 : 1
Divisions of available bone : By Mish & Judy ( 1990) Division A (Abundant bone) Dimension
> 5mm width > 10-13 mm height > 7 mm length < 30 degree angulation Crown / implant ratio < 1 Treatment options:Division A root form implant
Division B (Barely sufficient bone) : Adequate bone height, but reduced bone width
Dimensions 2.5 – 5 mm width > 10 – 13 mm height > 12mm length < 20 degree angulation Crown / implant ratio < 1
Treatment Options Osteoplasty , Division A root form Augumentation, Demanding aesthetics Great force factors
Narrow Implant Division B root form, Plate form.
Division C (Compromised bone) Unfavourable in : Width , Height , Length Angulation > 30 o
, Crown / implant ratio > 1 T/t options: Osteoplasty / Augumentation Fixed prosthesis endosteal or ramus frame or
transosteal implants.
Division D (Deficient bone): severe atrophy Dimension: Severe atrophy Basal bone lossFlat maxilla Pencil thin mandible T/t options: Augumentation
BONE QUALITY: Lekholm
and Zarb (1985) classified the bone quality into four classes Q1: Dense homogenous cortical bone with a small
trabecular bone Q2: Large, dense layer of cortical bone surrounding dense trabecular core Q3: Thinner layer of cortical
bone around dense trabecular core Q4: Thin cortical layer surrounding low-density trabecular bone.
Classification (Misch 1990) : D1 - Thick, dense compact bone Site : Anterior segment of the
atrophic edentulous mandible Thick lateral aspects of anterior mandible Advantages : Provides good primary stability
for the implants. More implant bone interface approximately 80%. Because of this use of shorter implants is possible.
It is highly mineralized and able to withstand greater loads.
5. Ensures excellent bone stability even after trauma. 6. Threaded Titanium implants when
placed into D1 bone, proved to be very predictable over long term period with a success rate of above 94%. ( Adell
1981, Babbush 1986) Disadvantages: Low Vascular supply compared with other bone categories and healing phase
is longer. Bone height is often short and so crown to implant ratio is increased . Difficult implant bed preparation and
may require greater burr revolutions ( up to 2000 rpm). Healing time is 5 months and immediate loading can be done
D2 Bone : Thick porous compact bone with coarse trabecular core. Site: Anterior and
posterior segment of the mandible. Anterior maxillary segment ( palatal aspect). Advantages: Provides immediate
stability and long term survival. Osseointegration is very predictable. The intrabony bleeding helps control over heating
during preparation. The percentage of contact at bone implant interface is 70%. The excellent blood supply and rigid
initial fixation permit adequate bone healing within 4 months. Progressive loading is important.
D3 Bone: Thin porous compact bone with coarse trabecular core. Site: Anterior (Facial
aspect) and posterior segments of the maxilla, posterior segments of the mandible, Condition following osteoplasty of
D2 bone Advantages: Good blood supply. Disadvantages Difficult implant bed preparation (widening). careful to avoid
lateral perforations of the cortical bone.
The rotations of the drill may have to be reduced to less than 1000 rpm to improve thetactile sense of the bone preparation. 3. Because of reduced implant bone interface, more number of implants may be
necessary. Time period of healing - 6 months. Extended gradual loading should be done.
D4 Bone: Fine trabecular bone Site: Maxillary tuberosity, condition following osteoplasty of
D3 Bone. Advantages: None. Disadvantages: Has very little bone density and little or no crestal cortical bone. Difficult
implant bed preparation. The bone site is easily distorted resulting in reduced initial stability of the implant.
Reduced implant bone interface, so optimum usage of available bone is necessary.
Number of implants to be placed is increased. Obtaining rigid fixation for the implant is very difficult. Up to 8 months of
undisturbed healing is suggested.
Diagnosis & Patient Evaluation
Evaluation of the patient for implant therapy: -Includes medical, dental and diagnostic
evaluation. Medical evaluation : The placement of an implant is basically a surgical procedure, the patients should be
evaluated if she/ he is fit to undergo surgery. Medically compromised patients who are unfit for surgical therapy are
contraindicated for implant therapy. Eg : endocrine disorder, cardiovascular disorder etc
Factors that affect the prognosis of implant prosthesis include-: Diabetes Arteriosclerosis
Renal diseases Endocrine imbalances Malnutritional effects Diseases of the CNS Smoking Age Motivation
Dental evaluation: Dental history will involve an oral examination, a radiographic examination and a
diagnostic evaluation. The oral examination should include routine assessment of hard & soft tissues. A dental &
periodontal evaluation will elicit information on the presence of caries, periodontal diseases & oral hygiene status.
EXTRA ORAL EXAMINATION: - Smile line -Smile symmetry -Incisal edges in relation to
Lower lip - Functional analyses - examination of the temporomandibular joints, muscles of mastication and occlusal
relationships. If functional disturbances of the masticatory system are present, recreate functional harmony by
selective grinding or fabrication of night guard.
INTRA ORAL EXAMINTION : Inspection of the oral cavity - Mucosal situation ( such as width
of attached gingiva) -Possible existence of pathological changes -Extent of bone resorption -Presence of lesions /
abscess : Inter arch space : Ideal inter arch space : 7 mm – posterior 8 – 10 mm – anterior Tooth Mobility oral hygiene
habits & periodontal health
Intraoral bidigital palpation - available bone mass (width), contour of the alveolar processand thickness of mucosa. Measurement of Mucosal thickness: to evaluate the width of available bone. The needle is
inserted through the mucosa to the bone surface and a rubber stop marks the position of the depth.
2/13/2014 Dental Implants -Part - 1 by Dr. Shahid Ppt Presentation
http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/drshahidkhan-1834164-dental-implants-part-dr-shahid/ 6/7
Diagnostic methods:
Timing of implant radiography:
Radiographic diagnosis:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
Diagnostic casts or study model analysis:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
PowerPoint Presentation:
Bibliography:
Diagnostic methods A primary determinant for the long term success of the endosteal implants
is the best possible anchorage in the bone. Before attempting any implant treatment. Analysis of appropriate and
adequate radiographs. Analysis of mounted study models.
Timing of implant radiography Time in months Radiographic procedures Treatmentplanning -1 Periapical, panoramic, cross sectional tomography, CT, Cephalometry Surgery (fixture placement) 0 Films
only for the correction of problems. Healing 0-3 Films only for the correction of problems Remodelling 4-12 Periapical,
panoramic Maintenance (without problem) 13+ Periapical, panoramic (follow up every three years) Problem present
(any time) Periapical, panoramic, cross sectional tomography
Radiographic diagnosis Peri apical radiographs: Intra oral radiographs provide valuableinformation concerning - The mesiodistal dimension, bone height . To determine whether implant treatment can be
performed after bone augmentation, if available bone volume is less. Any residual pathology.
Disadvantages : It cannot provide information about the buccolingual dimension of the
bone and whether implant treatment can be performed. 2. Limited value in determining bone density as a lateralcortical plates prevent accurate interpretation. 3. Little use in depicting the spatial relationship between the critical
structures and the proposed implant site
Occlusal radiograph: Can provide information about the cortical and cancellous bone
structure in edentulous jaw segments i.e., bone quality. It provides the 3 rd dimension in combination with otherradiographs to clarify the existence and localization of root tips, cysts, tumors etc. The disadvantage is that it shows the
widest width of the bone (at the base), rather than the width at the crest where diagnostic information is needed most.
Panoramic radiograph: General view of both jaw & bone condition Jaw relationship.Location of landmarks-
Advantages : 1. The opposing landmarks are easily identified. 2. The vertical height of bonecan be assessed. 3. Procedure is performed with convenience and speed. Gross anatomy of the jaws and any related
pathologic findings can be evaluated. Disadvantages : Produces vertical magnification of up to 10 % and horizontalmagnification of up to 20 %. 2. Does not demonstrate bone quality. 3. Does not provide spatial relationship betweenthe critical structures and the implant site.
Overcoming the shortcomings – Use of diagnostic templates that have 5mm ball bearings
or wires incorporated around the curvature of the dental arch when the radiograph is taken can enable the clinician todetermine the amounts of magnification in the radiograph. These metal spheres appear radio opaque in the film.
Because their diameter is known, it is easy to calculate the true bone height. (Spiekermann 1987)
Lateral cephalometric radiograph : Demonstrates a cross sectional image of the alveolus
of both the mandible and the maxilla in the midsagittal plane. Is more accurate for bone quantity determinations unlikepanoramic or periapical images. Magnification ranges from 6% to 15%. Provides information on bone availability in the
region of premaxilla and symphysis of the mandible.
Computed tomography : CT enables differentiation of both hard tissues and soft tissues. Tomographic sections
produced are of best image quality due to less disturbing ghost shadows from adjacent structures. CT enablesidentification of disease, identification of critical structures at the proposed region determination of bone quantity,
quality determination of the position and orientation of dental implants.
Evaluation of Misch’s bone density using CT number or Hounsfield unit : Each CT imageproduced has 2,60,000 pixels and each pixel has a CT number or Hounsfield unit (HU) related to the density of thetissues within the pixel Higher the CT number, denser is the tissue. D1 : >1250 HU D2: 850 HU - 1250 HU D3: 350 HU
– 850 HU D4: <400 HU
3-D reconstruction from CT data : 3-dimensional anatomical models of the jaws and skullscan be fabricated using CT data. Such models permit direct preoperative measurements as well as precisedeterminations of the spatial relationships between mandible and maxilla. COSMETIC, RESTORATIVE & IMPLANT
DENTISTRY 2009
Stereolithography: From the available CT data a model can be created from a solid block ofmaterial by means of a computer guided milling device or with two laser beams. In the future these type of 3-D
reconstruction may become a mandatory aid for pre-operative planning in dental implant cases in situations wheredifficulties are anticipated.
Advantages: Precise evaluation of the actual osseous condition. Surgical therapy can beprecisely planned preoperatively for determination of the most favorable implant axis orientation. Helpful for evaluating
the relationship of mandible to maxilla.
Diagnostic casts or study model analysis For edentulous patients Study
models of edentulous patients mounted in an adjustable articulator using bite registration enables to determine -intermaxillary relationship. Prognathism & Retrognathism after resorbtion. increase in inter alveolar distance. vertical
relationships placement and orientation of implants Shape of the ridge & future corrections if required.
Study model analysis – partially edentulous patients The goal is to analyze balancebetween applied force and the implant bone segment. clinical length of the prosthetic crown that will be supported bythe implant. (Crown-implant ratio). Inter arch distance In the saggital plane, the implant axes should parallel the axes
of adjacent natural teeth. Number of implants.
Surgical guides: Partially edentulous patients: Helps to position the implants appropriatelyfrom the prosthetic point of view. with some remaining teeth, these stents can be fabricated in the form of claspretained partial dentures or modified bridge constructions. Holes are drilled into the acrylic at appropriate locations
with proper axis orientation. holes in the acrylic that guide the pilot drills are ideally located in the center of the occlusalsurface of the artificial teeth.
Edentulous patients Surgical guide is not necessary if the treatment plan involves a
complete denture retained by 2-4 implants in the anterior segment of the edentulous maxilla or mandible. But if thetherapy involves rigid screw fixation prosthesis then the use of a surgical guide is required to achieve the bestpossible treatment result. The guide is prepared from clear acrylic. It could even be the patient’s own complete
denture.
Bibliography Contemporary Implant Dentistry, Carl E. Misch; 2 nd edition. Implantology – HubertusSpiekermann Atlas of Oral Implantology, A. Norman Cranin ; 2 nd edition Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry.Jan Lindhe ; 4 th edition . Carranza’s Clinical Periodontology. Takei, Newman, Carranza; 9 th edition.
2/13/2014 Dental Implants -Part - 1 by Dr. Shahid Ppt Presentation
http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/drshahidkhan-1834164-dental-implants-part-dr-shahid/ 7/7
Account
Join Now
Sign In
Premium
Education Specials
RSS
Featured
Featured Audio
Featured Animated
Latest Uploads
Most Liked
Most View ed
Featured Lessons
Browse
Podcast
Featured
Featured Audio
Featured Animated
Latest Uploads
Most Liked
Most View ed
Categories
Facebook App
Developers
Get your Widget
Channels
Latest Members
Pow erPoint TemplatesNEW
Help & Info
About Us
Help
API
FAQ
Contact Us
Terms and Conditions
Privacy Policy
Blog
Julia's Blog
Forum
What's new ?
Careers
Webinars
Why authorSTREAM
Feature Tour
How it Works
Pow erPoint to Video & iPod
Pow erPoint on Blogs
Pow erPoint to Flash
Share Presentations Online
Present Live
Presentations on iPad
Presentation Analytics
Branded Channels
Video in PPT
Greeting Cards
Referral
authorSTREAM Desktop
Buzz on authorSTREAM
Follow us on:
US 210-787-1860Open Monday to Friday, 8 AM to 6 PM EST
Have a question? Call us at
View and Share Fun Presentations on
Facebook Go to Application
© 2013 authorSTREAM. All rights reserved.