29
Duality in the Creation Accounts

Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Duality in the Creation Accounts

Page 2: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Egypt is in the background of the two creation accounts found

in the books of Moses and Abraham.

Page 3: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Duality pervades Egyptian thought and world view.

Page 4: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of
Page 5: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Desert

River

Page 6: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Desert

River

Chaos

Order

Page 7: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

The importance of duality in Egyptian thought . . .

Page 8: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

The importance of duality in Egyptian thought . . .

“The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of a united Egypt still bore the title ‘lord of the two lands’ and ‘he of the sedge and the bee.’ Similarly, the county was divided into the black land and the red land, and split between the east (the land of the living) and the west (the realm of the dead). The earth was distinct from the heavens but the two together were the complementary halves of the created universe, while beyond the universe was the ‘uncreated,’ the chaos from which man and the gods had emerged.

Page 9: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

“The duality is present at many levels of thought and symbolism, so that there are gods of Upper and Lower Egypt, and the gods of the living and the dead. The mythical struggle between Horus and Seth was essentially regarded as the universal struggle between good and evil, the triumph of light over darkness and the prevailing of order over chaos.” (The Dictionary of Ancient Egypt [1995], p. 88)

Page 10: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of
Page 11: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Lower Egypt

Upper Egypt

Page 12: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Dualism exemplified in the dual monarchy of ancient Egypt:

Page 13: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Dualism exemplified in the dual monarchy of ancient Egypt:

The government of ancient Egypt was a “dual monarchy, the kingship of Upper and the kingship of Lower Egypt united in the single person of the ruler. This extraordinary conception expressed in political form the deeply rooted Egyptian tendency to understand the world in dualistic terms as a series of pairs of contrasts balanced in unchanging equilibrium.” (Henri Frankfort, Kingship and the Gods [1978], p. 19)

Page 14: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Narmer’s Palette

Page 15: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Narmer’ in Battle

Page 16: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Narmer’s Palette

Page 17: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Narmer’s Palette

Crown of Upper Egypt

Page 18: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Narmer’s Palette

Crown of Upper Egypt

Page 19: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Narmer’s Palette

Crown of Upper Egypt

Crown of Upper Egypt

Page 20: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Narmer’s Palette

Crown of Upper Egypt

Crown of Upper Egypt

Page 21: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Crowns of Ancient Egypt

Page 22: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Crowns of Ancient Egypt

Upper

Page 23: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Crowns of Ancient Egypt

Upper Lower

Page 24: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Crowns of Ancient Egypt

Page 25: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Narmer—Pharoah United Egypt

Page 26: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of
Page 27: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

This picture shows two goddesses Wadjet wearing the red crown of lower Egypt and Nekhbet wearing the white crown of upper Egypt.

Page 28: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Dualism in Moses 2• Day 1 Without form and void; light and

darkness; day and night ; morning and evening (vss 2-5)

• Day 2 Divided waters (above) from waters (under) the firmament (vss 6-(above7)

• Day 3 Dry land and Sea; seed and it’s fruit (vss 9-12)

• Day 4 Lights in heaven for signs and for seasons; for days and years; the greater (sun) and lesser (moon) lights (vss 14-18)

• Day 5 Sea life and fowl in the air (vss 20-21)

Page 29: Desert River Desert River Chaos Order “The Egyptians believed that unity was emphasized by the complementary of its parts. Thus the king of

Dualism in Moses 2Day 6 . . . • animals and man; • God said unto mine Only Begotten; • Let us make man in our image after our

likeness; • Man is created male and female (vss. 24-27)