55

Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen
Page 2: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d

acknowledgements:

Business Improvement District #2Board of DirectorsEinar Tangen, ChairRon San Felippo, Vice-ChairMichael DeMichele, SecretaryMichael Gardner, TreasurerFrank KrejciScott SampsonGreg UhenRobert MonnatDick Wright

HTW Architectural Review BoardAlderman Robert Bauman, ChairmanEinar Tangen, Chair, BID #2Michael DeMichele, BID #2James Piwoni, AIAMatthew Jarosz, HPCDoug Stoneman, residentTracy Williams, DCDChris Rute, ARB ConsultantNancy O’Keefe, Board Secretary

Historic Third Ward AssociationBoard of DirectorsRon San Felippo, PresidentChuck Ward, Vice-PresidentDoug Stoneman, SecretaryMike Gardner, TreasurerStephanie Sherman, At LargeDennis BarthenheierLarry ComptonAngie D’AmatoSue DarrowMichael DeMicheleKaren ElertDon EllingsenBill JennaroClarke Johnson, ex-officioCarl KomassaChristopher LibbyMark LawsonMike MooneyBeth Nichols, ex-officioSue RiordanScott SampsonDon SmileySue StraussEinar TangenGreg UhenAndrew Wadsworth

Special Thanks to David Reed andDouglas Ryhn for their contributions tothe original guidleine document which

has provided the criteria for ARBdecisions over the past decade.

DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE HISTORIC THIRD WARD NEIGHBORHOOD

CITY OF MILWAUKEETo m B a r r e t t, M a y o r

City Planning CommissionR. Gray Mitchem, ChairPatricia Torres, Vice ChairMichael DawsonDouglas DrakeLarri Sue JacquartJ. Allen StokesGaurie Rodman

Department of City DevelopmentRocky Marcoux, CommissionerMartha Brown, Deputy CommissionerRobert Greenstreet, Planning DirectorJohn Hyslop, Assistant Planning Director

2006 EDITION

DCD Review GroupJohn HyslopVanessa KosterMichael MaierleKaren MierowGreg PatinMichael Wisniewski

Consultant TeamJames Piwoni, AIA Author / Editorin association withAmerican Design Inc., MappingJennifer Fletcher, Graphic LayoutRyan Schulze, Graphic Editing

Common CouncilAld. Willie Hines, PresidentAld. Ashanti HamiltonAld. Joe DavisAld. Mike D’AmatoAld. Robert BaumanAld. Jim BohlAld. Michael McGeeAld. Willie WadeAld. Robert DonovanAld. Robert PuenteAld. Michael MurphyAld. Joe DudzikAld. Jim WitkowiakAld. Terry WitkowskiAld. T. Anthony Zielinski

Page 3: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d

table of contents:

Introduction

Urban Design Character is t ics

How to use these Guidelines

Spatial Organization of the District

Legal BoundariesVisual BoundariesStreets & Blocks and Development PatternsPatterns of Use

Design Principles of Urban Spaces

Street Space EnclosureContinuity of Building EdgeCross Section of StreetsSocial Life of the Street: Structure of SpacesSocial Life of the Street: UsesSocial Life of the Street: EntrancesSocial Life of the Street: Entrances-Residential

Parking

Parking: On StreetParking: Off Street

6

678

10

12

12131416181920

22

2223

3 Buildings Within the Urban Framework

Character

DemolitionNew Building TypesVarietyDesign Themes-Adaptive ReuseDesign Themes- Industrial AestheticDesign Themes- Urban ResidentialDesign Themes- Urban Mixed UseDesign Themes- Low Rise ReuseSignature SitesStreet FacadesDiversityRiverfront Facades

Design Composition

Base, Middle, TopRoofsSilhouetteProportionRhythmSolid and VoidScaleNeighboring Structures

Form

Infill SitesFacade HeightBack FacadesExposed Sides of BuildingsBalconiesPenthousesVertical Facade ExtensionsRenovations and AdditionsMechanical and Safety Equipment

28

282930323334353637383940

42

4244454647484950

52

525354555658596062

25 Preservation of Neighborhood Qualities

Building Details

Windows and Window OpeningsDoors and Door OpeningsGarage DoorsStorefrontsSecurity Grills and GatesBuilding SignsSidewalk SignsOther SignsCanopies, Marquees, and AwningsExterior Building Lighting

Building Materials

Surface Treatment and FinishesOrnamentation and TrimPaintingColorGhost Signs

Wall Murals and Public Art

Bibliography

Appendix

Riverwalk ElementsPhoto CreditsCity of Milwaukee Ordinance 200-61

Architectural Review Board

66

66686970737480818284

86

8687888990

91

92

94

949899

64

Page 4: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d 1

INTRODUCTION

What are Design Guidelines?

Introduction and Background to the Study

This revised document integrates additional design criteriaconcerning new construction on open land expanding from thepredominant preservation objectives of the original DesignGuidelines for the HistoricThird Ward District. It presents guidelinesthat address the urban character of the District, the issuessurrounding buildings within the urban framework, and the issuesrelated to preservation of the building character. It does not usurpState building codes or City ordinances but supplements them.

The City of Milwaukee Common Council approval of the BusinessImprovement District No. 2 in 1988 authorized the BID Board toestablish a design review process for projects within its boundariesseeking building permits.

In the summer of 1989 the Historic Third Ward Association, Inc.together with the City of Milwaukee Business improvement DistrictNo. 2 Board, the City of Milwaukee Department of CityDevelopment, and the Historic Preservation Division of the StateHistoric Society of Wisconsin, sought assistance from the urbandesign team of James Piwoni, David Reed, and Doug Ryhn.

To establish the criteria for evaluating proposals, the teamrecommended a participatory process to encourage input into theprocess for the property owners, to facilitate an understanding ofthe guidelines as they developed, and to gain voluntary support forthe guidelines. The participatory approach yielded a documentwith 62 original design guidelines. The report was accepted by thefunding organizations. In 1990 the Common Council, City ofMilwaukee, adopted the guidelines as the basis for determinationsof a newly formed Third Ward Architectural Review Board, that canissue “Certificates of Appropriateness”.

Since their adoption, much has been learned by the ArchitecturalReview Board about the strengths and deficiencies of the originalGuidelines. Inevitably, revisions and amendments becomenecessary as changes occur. The most recent year long processof revision and update culminating in this document, recalls muchof the fourteen years of experience the ARB has had reviewingproposals. It concurrently considered the next decade or twoanticipating architectural and urban design issues evolving fromand coordinated with the simultaneous preparation of the Third WardNeighborhood Comprehensive Plan.

The design guidelines presented in this report were again preparedusing a participatory approach. ARB work sessions were scheduled.These review board meetings were publicized as meeting agendaitems. All meetings are open to the public.

Process of Revision

An average meeting would include eight to ten participants.During each session the consultant presented several guidelineissues. These were thoroughly discussed by all participants,amended, qualified, and rewritten where necessary.

During the weeks between ARB sessions, analysis and graphicmaterial was prepared to articulate the new guidelines and toprepare materials explaining those issues.

A great deal of productive interaction occurred during the worksessions. Special appreciation is extended to those people whogave of their time to participate in the process.

This process of updating also triggered a revision of the enablingCity ordinance governing the ARB. A copy of that adopted newordinance is included in the Appendix.

Fire precaution regulations, daylight standards, building setbacklines, and other codes have a major, yet incidental, impact onthe design of the built form, but are not conceived of or drawnup with this end in mind. Within codes specific design controlsare minimal. Where they exist they are limited and work on theassumption that aesthetics are a matter of individual taste. Baddesign is condemned but undefined.

It is the purpose of the guidelines presented in this publicationto provide everyone involved in the rehabilitation and design ofbuildings with a clear set of parameters concerning design inthe Third Ward Neighborhood. For developers, planners, anddesigners, these guidelines explain the context within whichdesign changes should take place and outline the District’ssignificant characteristics. For property owners, these guidelineshelp to ensure that future design changes in the District willenhance the value of existing property. For the community,these guidelines increased the chance that the local urbanenvironment will be maintained and enhanced for futuregenerations.

Whether design control should operate at all and, if so, to whatextent continues to be a source of considerable debate. Thisdebate will no doubt continue. However, many from both sidesof the argument are aware of the deteriorating quality of theurban environment and see some form of intervention as bothnecessary and desirable.

The challenge is to determine the amount and the scope ofintervention. The guidelines presented in this publication seekto achieve this balance for design in the expanding Third Wardneighborhood of Milwaukee.

publication information:

The Historic Third Ward is located immediately south ofMilwaukee’s downtown. The area was originally a thriving, tightlypacked urban neighborhood and the city’s wholesaling andwarehousing district. After a period of economic decline, changeis taking place in the district through the addition of new buildingsand the rehabilitation of existing buildings. Design Guidelinesfor the Historic Third Ward Neighborhood seeks to give adirection to the change that will allow the essential historiccharacter of the District to be preserved. The guidelines provideproperty owners and developers within the BID area, directiontowards maintaining the architectural integrity of their buildingsand contributing to the overall historic character of the District.They also present a framework for architects to rehabilitateexisting buildings or design new buildings with an awareness ofthe special characteristics of the historic neighborhood.

Each design guideline is elaborated in the text and illustratedthrough photographs and diagrams showing unacceptable andacceptable solutions.

The Historic Third Ward Neighborhood Design Guidelines:James Piwoni, AIA

Abstract

The revised edition of these guidelines was commissioned andpublished by the Historic Third Ward Association, Inc., alongwith the City of Milwaukee Business Improvement District No. 2Board and the the City of Milwaukee Department of CityDevelopment.

The original guidelines were co-funded with the assistance fromthe National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, underprovision of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1996, asamended. Historic Preservation grants-in-aid are administeredin Wisconsin in conjunction with the National Register of HistoricPlaces program by the Historic Preservation Division of the StateHistorical Society of Wisconsin. However, the contents andopinions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflectthe views or policies of the National Park Service or the StateHistorical Society of Wisconsin.

Design Guidelines for the Historic Third Ward, MilwaukeeJames Piwoni, David Reed, and Doug Ryhn

Page 5: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d

HOW TO USE THESE GUIDELINES

3

The guidelines presented in this publication are divided into threesections, each related to different levels of proposed change:

Section One: Urban Design CharacteristicsThis section considers change at the largest scale. It is aimedat an audience of developers, planners, and city officials and assuch is sub-titled Planning and Design Guidelines for theDevelopment Team.

Section Two: Building within the Urban FrameworkThis section focuses on changes to individual structures whereState law requires an architect to certify construction documents.It is subtitled Technical Design Guidelines for the Architect.

Section Three: Preservation of Building CharacterThis section addresses incremental change occurring at thescale of building sub-systems or components where the owner

2

URBAN DESIGN CHARACTERISTICSspatial organization of the district

Planning and Design Guidelines for the Development Team

the principles of urban design

may choose not to engage the service of an architect but dealdirectly with a contractor. This section is subtitled Owner’sGuidelines for Minor Building Improvements and Maintenance.

Format:Each guideline is expressed in general terms in bold face text.This general statement is then qualified and explained in writtenand graphic form. The text generally follows a format of describingthe existing conditions, restating or redefining the guideline, andexplaining the implications of the guideline and its resulting impacton the District.

Language:Work session participants generally agreed that guidelines shouldbe stated in as strong a language as possible to emphasize theimportance of each.

“One building standing alone in the countryside isexperienced as a work of architecture, but bring half a dozenbuildings together and an art other than architecture ismade possible.” Gordon Cullen: Townscape. London,Architectural Press, 1961.

Early Third Ward Neighborhood

Page 6: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d 5

Introduction.

The Historic Third Ward is a vital historic area containing a largeconcentration of late 19th and early 20th century industrial andwarehousing buildings. It is located immediately to the south ofMilwaukee’s downtown, although separated from it by theelevated I-794 expressway. The District is bounded on the eastby Lake Michigan and the Summerfest grounds and fronts on tothe Milwaukee River to the west and south.

The major concentration of historic buildings is in the area westof Milwaukee Street. While several individual buildings haveoutstanding architectural quality, it is the overall ensemble whichgives the Third Ward its special identity. It is the concentrationof the older buildings, the relationships between the buildingsand the overall environment, the strong definition of the streets,and its cultural landscape that give the Third Ward its specialcharacter and unique identity within the region.

Over the past decade there has emerged a new sense of purposeand enthusiasm in the Historic Third Ward. During this timemany older buildings have been rehabilitated for office, housing,commercial, and other new activities, and a property ownerand merchants organization, the Historic Third Ward Association,Inc., has successfully promoted the revitalization of the area.

Many of the other buildings outside the historic district arestructurally sound but will require rehabilitation and remodelingto accommodate new uses and to make a positive contributionto the emerging vitality.

Land uses within the Third Ward Neighborhood are varied.Although industrial use and warehousing activities once

4

predominated, retail and commercial use is expanding, particularlyalong the groundfloor frontages of Water Street, Broadway, and tosome extent, along Milwaukee Street. Upper floor space in manybuildings has been converted to office use and housing. New, large-scale mid-rise housing developments have redefined entire blockseast of Milwaukee Street, along Jefferson, Jackson, and ErieStreets.

While the Historic Third Ward is essentially fully developed, thereare several vacant or under-utilized building sites scatteredthroughout the District. However, to the east of Jackson Street,the land is primarily used for surface parking in relation to theSummerfest grounds. This large continuous piece of vacant usableland (approximately 15 acres), is the former Coachyard land.

The District is now at a critical juncture. For development to takeplace, future growth and change must be introduced in a sensitiveand orderly manner that is compatible with the District’s past andwith its extensive historic legacy.

The following design guidelines address the issues related tochange in the urban fabric of the District and the urban design issuesat the largest scale. They are intended to help developers, planners,and city officials make decisions that affect the whole District. Theyare, therefore, necessarily broad in scope but address elementsrelated to the design of the urban fabric of the District that havegiven the area such a distinct character. These guidelines seek topreserve this character and to learn critical lessons from it toinfluence the quality and shape of new development in the area.

U r b a n D e s i g n C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s

Urban Scale Principles

parking

infillsites

social lifein the street

streetenclosure

streetcrosssection

buildingedgecontinuityB

road

way

St. Paul

Buffalo

h

w

Wat

er

Page 7: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d

SPATIAL ORGANIZATION OF THE DISTRICTlegal boundaries

76

This Historic Third Ward District, a designated historic districtlisted in the National Register of Historic Places, defines thecore area of historic buildings.

Three other overlapping districts define administrative areas thatare significantly related. Each has different boundaries and hasparticular characteristics associated with its function.

The Business Improvement District (BID) was established as alegal entity in 1988 capable of generating revenue by assessinga fee to all property owners throughout the District. The objectiveof the BID Board is to direct the expenditure of these revenuesfor the management and promotion of the District as a whole.

U r b a n D e s i g n C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s

SPATIAL ORGANIZATION OF THE DISTRICTvisual boundaries

Design Guideline: Reinforce existing strongvisual edges of The Historic Third Ward Neigh-borhood.

Routes into the District from these surrounding areas are markedby bridges over the river or underpasses beneath the freewaythat reinforce the experience of entering the District.

To the east, however, the vacant coach yards and industrialareas form a poorly defined subarea adjacent to the historicdistrict. New development in this area should extend the urbancharacter of the Historic Third Ward to the freeway, and continueto define the District. It should also reinforce existing boundaries,and emphasize the gateways to the neighborhood.

Design Principle: Urban neighborhoods with a distinct image areoften defined by clear boundaries, edges marked with entry points,urban gateways.

The Tax Incremental Financing Districts(TID) 11 and 34 wereestablished in 1988 and 2000 as mechanisms whereby new publicimprovements in the District are paid for by new tax revenues thatresult in part from new private investments stimulated by the publicimprovements.

In 1988, TID 11 financed the Historic District streetscapeimprovements. In 2000, TID 34 financed construction of theRiverwalk’s first phase from Clybourn to the Water Street Bridge.At the time of this edition, other TID’s are under consideration. Themost recent TID, #56, was established in 2004.

The Historic Third Ward is bounded on three sides by very strongphysical boundaries that define and give image to the District. Tothe north, the I-794 freeway separates the District from thedowntown. To the west and south, the Milwaukee River separatesthe District from the Menomonee River Valley and Walkers Point.These cognitive boundaries present a strong image that gives clearidentity to the Historic Third Ward.

NEIGHBORHOOD GATEWAYS

Page 8: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d

SPATIAL ORGANIZATION OF THE DISTRICTpattern of streets and blocks

9

Design Guideline: In general, the existingpattern of streets and blocks should be main-tained and extended

Two rejected proposed developments, the Italian CommunityCenter scheme by Bonifica and the Baseball Stadium proposal,were multi-block developments of a scale that would havedramatically contrasted with the scale of the Historic Third Ward.In order to consistently extend the scale of the Historic District,existing streets should be maintained and no further encroachmentof buildings into streets should be permitted.

New streets should expand the city grid to the east up to the freewayto create a pattern of streets and blocks that is generally consistentwith the historic urban fabric. This is a fundamental step in guidingthe scale of future development.

8

Design Principle: Street layout fundamentally guides the scaleof future development and can ascribe cultural significances byvariation within the pattern of streets and blocks.

Historically, the scale of development within the District has beenconstrained by the size of a city block and available buildingtechnologies. The railway coachyards, however, were neversubdivided into city blocks.

Recent development practices have permitted larger buildingsthat either block existing streets or occupy an area larger thanone city block.

.

U r b a n D e s i g n C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s

Design Guideline: As development proceeds,vacant sites should be filled with mid-risebuildings, including parking structures.

The decline of the rail network further added to the attrition andcreated the large vacant area of the Coachyards (Map, p 10).

This suburban industrial park land use pattern and resultantbuilding type is not the highest and best use, and is inappropriatein this urban location and out of character with the evolvingneighborhood.

Just as low single-story development must be avoided so mustthe prevalent urban pattern of high-rise development withsurrounding surface parking. Where possible parking shouldbe concentrated in multilevel structures to fill voids along streetsin the neighborhood.

Design Principle: The height of new buildings should not vary toomuch from the predominant height of buildings in the HistoricDistrict.

Typically the pattern of building within the District has been mid-rise structures occupying the majority of the city block. Urbanattrition has resulted in major gaps within the urban fabric. Thesegaps have afforded the opportunity to inject needed surface parkinglots into the area. New industrial building resulting from changingtransportation patterns and freeway access to the area clearedout existing development and established a pattern of large singlelevel industrial buildings with adjacent surface parking areas.

Existing Surface Parking

Undesirable Low Rise Development

Undesirable High-Rise Development

Desirable Pattern of Mid-Rise Development

development pattern

Page 9: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d U r b a n D e s i g n C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s

SPATIAL ORGANIZATION OF THE DISTRICTpatterns of use

11

Design Guideline: Multi-story, mixed usedevelopment is preferred throughout theDistrict. Single story, single use develop-ment in the district is prohibited.

The 1980’s marked a rediscovery of the vital historic qualities ofthe District leading to the renaissance of the neighborhood for newresidential, service, and retail activities.

Continuation of this trend has the potential to lead to an exciting,vital mixture of uses and activities that build upon the uniquequalities of the historic district.

10

Within the District there has been a series of economic cycles thathave markedly changed the pattern of land use over a period oftime. The early Italian community which dominated the Districtincluding housing, schools, churches, and supporting neighborhoodactivities. Urban renewal and freeway development of the 1960’sbrought about the demise of that neighborhood and its ultimatereplacement by manufacturing warehousing, and distributionactivities. Planning theory of the 1960’s tended to promote theseparation of land uses into their own discrete zones.

Proposed Mixed Use

Historic Pattern of Use 1970’s Pattern of Use

1970’s Use of Buildings

Key:1. Wholesale/ Manufacturing2. Italian Neighborhood3. Rail Yards4. Light Manufacturing5. Vacant Coachyards6. Henry Meier Festival Grounds7. Mixed Uses

The design principle is meant to encourage activities andpatterns of compatible land use that already exist in the historicdistrict, see Historic Third Ward Neighborhood ComprehensivePlan.

It is particularly intended to include the unique activities of thefruit and vegetable markets of Commission Row, the continuedexpansion of residential, service, and retail activities; theexpansion of cultural opportunities, galleries, and the theatre;and the continued presence of light manufacturing.

Design Principle: A mix of compatible land uses brings addedvitality, amenity, and often security to the streets of urbanneighborhoods

The Third Ward has been characterized by a mix of uses. Thesehave included manufacturing, warehousing, wholesaledistribution, industrial, commercial office, institutional, retail andresidential uses..

2005 THIRD WARD NEIGHBORHOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICTS

Page 10: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d

THE PRINCIPLES OF URBAN DESIGNstreet enclosure

13

Design Guideline: New buildings or addi-tions developed in the neighborhood shall bebuilt up to the street edge to contribute tostreet enclosure.

Historically, buildings in the District were built at the street edge todefine the space of the street, reinforcing the urban quality of thedistrict. The 1960’s brought about a tendency to locate buildingsin the middle of a site with a substantial setback from the streetand with open space surrounding the building. This space oftenbecame the place for surface car parking.

In places where existing buildings are setback and do not reinforcethe street edge, trees and additional landscaping located on theboundary of the property can be used as a temporary expedient.

12

Desirable Development of the Street EdgeHistoric Pattern of Sreet Enclosure

U r b a n D e s i g n C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s

landscape usedto continuestreet edge

newbuildingsup tostreetedge

Exceptions: Residential building types if consistent with theguideline “Residential Street Entrance Transitions” on page 22-23.

Complete Street Enclosure by Corner Infill

New Building Provides Street Edge Continuity

In the same way that each building was built up to the street edgeproperty line, each city block was filled with a series of buildingsthat formed a continuous edge along the street.

Existing Undefined City Blocks

Preferred Definition of City Blocks

Design Guideline: New buildings shouldestablish a continuous edge at the propertyline.

undefinedbuilding edge

well definedbuilding edge

Design Principle: Historically, Third Ward street spaces areformed by building fronts at the street edge property line.

Exceptions: Residential building types if consistent with theguideline “Residential Street Entrance Transitions” on page20-21.

continuity of building edge

Design Principle: The prime underlying principle of all urbanplaces is the enclosure of space by buildings. If space isnot satisfactorily enclosed an attractive urban place cannotbe achieved.

Page 11: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d U r b a n D e s i g n C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s 15

Exceptions: See pages 37 and 53.

14

Design Principle: Maintain and extend the existing spatialcharacteristics of the Historic District streets by encouragingmulti-story buildings along the street edge throughout theneighborhood.

The actual height/width ratio that will give a harmonious effect forstreets in the Historic District could be as much as 1:1 (the height ofthe buildings equal to the width of the street). The height/width ratioshould be not less than 1:2.5 if a sense of enclosure is to be achieved.Built streets in the Neighborhood fall within this range.

cross sections of streetsTHE PRINCIPLES OF URBAN DESIGN

cross sections of streets

Broadway (South of Buffalo Street)

Broadway (North of Buffalo Street)

Water Street

Design Guideline: The overall maximumheight of a building, not including unoccu-pied elements, shall not exceed the width ofthe street right of way.

Design Guideline: The height of street facadesalong the property line shall not be greater thanseven stories and not less than 30’.

The current New Urbanist movement promotes this traditionalurban street forming approach in idealized new towndevelopments. The relationship between the height of the buildingsand the width of the street is important when creating ormaintaining the quality of urban streets. If the buildings are toohigh in relation to the width of the street, a canyon-like effect canbe created; if too low, there is no sense of street enclosure.

Inappropriate Canyon Effect Broadway Street

Water StreetCorners at Streets of Different Widths

New Town Street

Clarification:The front plane of projecting balconies shall not be considered as abuilding facade.

Corner Sites:For sites on intersecting rights of way of different widths the largerwidth may be applied in regulating the height within 80 feet of thecorner of the street intersection.Exception: See page 37, Landmark Sites

Page 12: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d U r b a n D e s i g n C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s

THE PRINCIPLES OF URBAN DESIGNsocial life of the street: structure

17

Design Guideline: The edges of publicspaces, streets, squares, plazas, walks, etc.,should support the comfort of pedestriansboth physically and psychologically.

The configuration of the building at the street edge—windows thatoverlook the street, the presence of entrances into buildings, theactivities that are in the buildings, particularly those in street levelspaces, and the quality of the streetscape itself encourage streetlife.

This street life, in turn, adds to the sense of security and well-beingfor those who use the street and the surrounding buildings.

The illustrations on this and the following pages give examples oftechniques for encouraging a vibrant of street life.

16

“Street is the river of the city. We come to these places not toescape from the city but to partake of it.” William Whyte.

Early photographs of the Historic Third Ward indicate an intenseand diverse street activity generated by the people and activitiesof the District (see page 47; Activity surrounding CommissionRow).

The vitality of an urban neighborhood depends greatly upon thesocial structure of the street and its sidewalks. The physicalform of the street and its surrounding buildings play an importantrole by providing a setting for these social activities.

...Streets should be for staying in, and not just for movingthrough. Make a bulge in the middle of a public path, andmake the path narrower, so that the path forms an enclosurewhich is a place to stay, not just a place to pass through.*

Surround public...places with pockets of activity..partly enclosedareas at the edges,...which make it natural for people to pauseand get involved.*

Path Shape

THE PRINCIPLES OF URBAN DESIGNsocial life of the street: uses

Design Guideline: Encourage a variety andintensity of public street life activity by provid-ing different settings for public use.

...Squares; they are the largest, most public rooms that the townhas. But when they are too large, they look and feel deserted.Make...much smaller than you would first imagine.*

People need green open places to go to...*

Design Guideline: Public squares should besmall to feel alive, 45’ to 65’ wide but no morethan 70’. Their length can be greater.

Design Guideline: Parks should be simple,not over-designed and should look and feelpublic. The following design criteria shallapply.

Just as the small mid-block street squares on Broadway providesettings for public outdoor activities, new urban spaces will beneeded as the neighborhood expands to the east.

Design Guidelines on pages 33-47 of the “Riverwalk DesignGuidelines for the Historic Third Ward” are adopted as applicableto all public space design for courtyards, squares, plazas, and walksin the neighborhood and are advisory but not binding in the designof the public street rights of way.

-Make the greens at least 150 feet across and at least 60,000 square feet in area.-The space shall be bordered by a street or at least sidewalks on all sides.-Provide a clean, grassy meadow upon the natural contours of the land.-Provide shade trees and public monuments.-Provide benches in the sun protected from the wind.-Provide unobstructed visual access thoughout.

*Excerpts from: A Pattern Language by Christopher Alexander

Small Public Square Park Green SpaceEdge Activity

Page 13: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d U r b a n D e s i g n C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s

THE PRINCIPLES OF URBAN DESIGNsocial life of the street: uses

1918

Encourage cafes to spring up in each neighborhood. Make themintimate places, with several rooms, open to a busy path, wherepeople can sit with coffee or a drink and watch the world go by.*

Building Edge

“...It is windows and doors that give transparency on commercialstreets, they invite you in, they show you what is there and ifthere is something to sell or buy they entice you.”**

But windows are important on all streets. “…A street withoutwindows is blind and frightening. When people can see intospaces from the street their world is enlarged.”*

**Excerpts from: Great Streets by Allan Jacobs

…Treat the edge of the building as a “thing”, a “place”, a zonewith volume to it, not a line or interface which has no thickness.*

THE PRINCIPLES OF URBAN DESIGNsocial life of the street: entrances

Design Guideline: A commercial buildingfacades should provide a high percentage oftransparency at the building street edge.

Design Guideline: Cafe facades along thestreet edge should activate the sidewalk withoutdoor seating or at least large windows.

Design Guideline: The edges of buildingsalong the street should have depth, cover,places to sit, as well as entrances.

Design Guideline: Entrances along streetfacades should be at intervals no greater than30 feet and exhibit ornamentation consistentwith the building’s architecture.

Buildings along the street should encourage people to slowdown, to linger, and be comfortable doing so. This con-nects the building to the social life of the street. To accom-plish this the edge can offer small places for bench seating,for standing out of the rain, for posting public notices, etc.

*Excerpts from: A Pattern Language by ChristopherAlexander

The best streets have about them a quality of transparencyat their edges.**

As an informal public place to sit, relax, read the newspa-per, enjoy a bite to eat and/or drink, and watch or meetpeople, street cafes “provide the social glue for the commu-nity.”*

*Excerpts from: A Pattern Language by ChristopherAlexander

The best streets are replete with entryways as little as twelvefeet apart.**

“Doorways...take you in, if only psychologically.”** Theyemphasize the presence of inhabitants, often exhibiting apersonal touch. These access points are a natural placefor expression, for ornament as various materials meetat corners and edges. Also see pages 70-72.

**Excerpts from: Great Streets by Allan Jacobs

Merchants Window Displays Street Cafes Frequent Entries

Exceptions:For large tenants where frequent entries are impractical,large display windows may be an acceptable substitute.Ornamented wall surfaces will also be considered.

Page 14: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d

social life of the street: residential entrance transitions

20

Guideline: As an exception to the Guidelinefor building up to the street property line,(page 12 and 13), exclusively residentialbuilding types should provide entrancetransition spaces at the street line, allowingfacades to be set back up to 8’.

After a lengthy period of absence residential building types arereappearing in the Third Ward. New multistory mixed use mid-rise types have been constructed following a pattern establishedby adaptive reuse of industrial warehouses lofts with ground floorcommercial. Now, exclusively residential types are beginning toappear. Traditionally the first floor of successful urban residentialbuildings provide transition from public street to the privatedwelling.

PRINCIPLES OF URBAN DESIGN

U r b a n D e s i g n C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s

`

…Make a transition space between the street and the frontdoor. Bring the path which connects the street and entrancethrough this transition space, and mark it with a change oflight, a change of sound, a change of direction, a change ofsurface, a change of level, perhaps by gateways whichmake a change of enclosure, and above all, with a changeof view…

21

Entrance Transitions

Unacceptable Blank Street Walls

Street Terraces Sunken Courts Staircases Entry Gardens

Entry Stoops

These urban residential types stress multiple entrances, (asmany as possible), and engage semi-public transition spacesthat at once enrich and activate the street yet insure the desiredprivacy required for urban living. The patterns pictured alsoprovide for informal surveillance of the street and thereforecontribute to making streets safe places.

Semi-public / semi-private terraces, gardens, stairs, courts,etc. raised, (less than 4’) a bit above the sidewalk elevationand integrated as a part of the project’s design are encour-aged forms of residential entry transitions.

Page 15: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d U r b a n D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s

THE PRINCIPLES OF URBAN DESIGN

23

Parking is of course a key consideration for any urbanredevelopment area. It should not, however, be allowed toadversely impact the qualities necessary for producing greatstreets as spelled out in this document. There are numerousways to provide for parking both on (in the public right of way),and off of the street, (private parcel parking and public structures).

22

Design Guideline: Street parking should beoptimized simultaneously with pedestriancrossings and streetscape improvements.

Design Guideline: Parking in the middle ofthe public right of way should be considered asan alternative that maximizes curb access andpedestrian crossing options.

Design Guideline: Provide parking along theedge of public squares and parks to help shieldthe public space from vehicular traffic.

Design Guideline: While parallel parking istypical along streets, diagonal or perpendicu-lar parking should be used where streetwidth allows an increase in street parkingcapacity.

Design Guideline: Off-street surface parking atthe street property line is prohibited.

Design Guideline: Surface parking shieldedfrom the street by walls, decorative fences,trees, and landscaping is allowed per City ofMilwaukee zoning ordinance. Capacity ofthese lots should be no more than 24 vehicles.

Design Guideline: Off-street parking accessshould be from alleys or secondary streets tominimize curb cuts, (limited to two perblockface total).

Design Guideline: Parking behind buildingsin mid-block parking courts is highly recom-mended.

Design Guideline: High volume parkingrequirements shall be accommodated inmultilevel mixed-use structures whose pre-dominant street level use is not parking.

on-street parking off-street parking

Curbside Diagonal

Park edge Diagonal Curbside Parallel

Street Center Diagonal

Parking Court Alley Garages Mixed Use Parking Structure

Edge Landscaping

Unacceptable Lot Edge

By applying the strategies in combination the parking impact canbe dispersed and more easily integrated to minimize the adverseimpacts to the pedestrian environment on the street.

Page 16: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d 2524

BUILDINGS WITHIN THE URBAN FRAMEWORKcharacter

design compositionform

Technical Design Guidelines for the Architect

“If a city’s streets look interesting, the city looks interesting;If they look dull, the city looks dull.” Jane Jacobs: The Deathand Life of American Cities. New York, Random House,1961.

Page 17: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d B u i l d i n g s W i t h i n t h e U r b a n F r a m e w o r k 27

Introduction

The following design guidelines for buildings are intended to helpowners, developers, and architects, for new and existing buildingalike understand the fundamental building characteristics of thisredeveloping mixed use urban neighborhood. The guidelineswere derived by systematic and rational analysis of the volumetricnature and external character of a typical Third Ward historiccommercial building.

The guidelines are intended to help the architect generatecompatible new design work. They are general enough to allowgreat latitude of individual response yet ensure that new buildingswill fit in with the unique ensemble of existing buildings.

Imitating an earlier style or period of architecture is not implied bythese guidelines. The architect is encuoraged to seekcontemporary expression within the general outline presented.

Doing so would be particularly appropriate when the new constructionhas a completely contemporary function such as a multi-story parkingstructure, a specialized cultural function, or an institutional program.

In particular, avoid the temptation to “early up” a building, that is, todesign a structure in a strictly functional way then “paste on” stockcolonial, early American, or other mass produced historical details.The architect should strive instead to integrate the building’s systemsand use ornament where systems meet or where it helps to sub-divide the facade into the sections suggested in the guidelines.

Ornament can also be used to add richness of detail as described insection three.

Despite the formula like appearance of these guideline, it remains asignificant test of design skill to integrate them so as to compose asensitive contemporary expression within this setting that contributesto the Section 1 emphasis of producing engaging urban streets.

26

Building Design Principles

Page 18: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d B u i l d i n g s W i t h i n t h e U r b a n F r a m e w o r k

CHARACTER

29

Design Guideline: No additional demolitionof historic building facades of pivotal orcontributing buildings in the historic districtwill be permitted, see exception.

Design Principle: All effort should be made to keep historicbuildings intact.

demolitionCHARACTER

new building types

28

Design Guideline: All new building elevationsshould express a building module similar tothe typical historical lot sizes of the Third WardDistrict.

Pattern of Historic Lot Sizes

Incorporate Historical Lot Patterns into Building Elevations

New buildings tend to be larger units of construction than thebuildings that were built in earlier generations. This change inscale of the building has a profound effect on the scale of theDistrict and on the quality of the street environment.

Proposed new buildings on a site larger than a single lot shouldexpress the original lot sizes in their structural modules. Toachieve this, it may be appropriate for the structural system ofthese buildings to relate to the lot sizes and become adeterminant of the facade articulation, assuring compatibilitywith the scale of historic development. Also see page 39.

Design Principle: Traditional lot sizes were a fundamentalcharacteristic of the parceling of the District and therefore becamea determining factor in the footprint and massing of the originalbuildings.

The street facades for the buildings indicated on the aboveillustration represent the major historic resource of contributingor pivotal buildings in the listing of the Historic Third Ward in theNational Register of Historic Places. It is recommended thatevery effort be made to adaptively reuse these buildings in acompatible way, requiring minimal alteration.

In cases where the building structure has deteriorated beyondrepair, every effort shall be made to salvage the street facadeswhile replacing the remaining portions of the building.

Exception: Removal of buildings with historic facades may beconsidered by the ARB if the proposal includes replacement with abuilding of equal or higher design quality consistent with theseDesign Guidelines

f e d c b a

fedca b

Multiple Buildings

Varied Facade

Page 19: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d B u i l d i n g s W i t h i n t h e U r b a n F r a m e w o r k

CHARACTER

31

There is no predominant architectural style among thebuildings of the District. In some cases, styles are mixedwithin the composition of a single building. There is, however,a more general level of similarity. Most structures are ofmasonry construction, predominately brick. Their height wascontrolled by fire codes, and their mass by lot sizes. Con-struction methods controlled the structural rhythm andstructural pattern of floors, walls, and columns. Openingsappear as if punched into the masonry facade. The applica-tion of ornament to this basic Early 20th Century warehousetype provides variety and richness.

30

Design Guideline: New buildings in theNeighborhood should be designed usingsimilar materials (brick, metal, glass, stone) tothose used on existing buildings and respectthe mass, rhythm, height, robust scale, andornamentation of existing buildings.

There are some structures that avoid the historical revivaliststyles (for example, Artcraft Building, Terminal Building, or 240North Milwaukee Street). Whether Art Deco or Art Moderne, theyexpress the modern idioms of longer spans, concrete frame, andthe larger curtain wall or industrial sash type of window. Thisstyle rejects ornamental moldings, classical elements, etc.,choosing instead to emphasize simplicity of form and line. Thesebuildings should be recognized and treated as products of themore recent modernist era.

variety

Proposed new buildings should respect the prevalent character-istics elaborated within these guidelines without mimicking anyparticular building. Following the guidelines contained within thispublication should lead to new buildings that fit comfortably intothe context of the urban streets of the District and yet expresstheir own individuality and time.

Scale: Many Related Parts

Massing

Rhythm

Materials

Height

Ornamentation

Victorian Gothic

Early Modern

Chicago Commercial Style

Romanesque

Post-Modern

Neoclassical Design

Page 20: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d B u i l d i n g s W i t h i n t h e U r b a n F r a m e w o r k

CHARACTER

3332

Design Guideline: Architects should cre-atively reinterpret the industrial strengthcharacter of the Third Ward in generatingcontemporary architectural proposals for theneighborhood.

The existing Design Guidelines for the Historic Third WardDistrict were developed by a process that carefully analyzed thecharacter of the historic core. This ensemble of turn of thecentury industrial warehouse buildings give the Third Ward itsdistinction as a city district. Its image clearly differs from the EastSide, Riverwest, Downtown, etc., because of its economichistory. These buildings supported a work environment withflexible high open bay structural systems of heavy timber orboard-formed concrete. Adaptability is the nature of thesespaces so when the industrial uses left, other commercial, thenresidential, uses were attracted to these spacious and robustNew York style industrial loft environments.

design themes - adaptive reuse design themes - industrial aestheticCHARACTER

Pages 30-31 of the Design Guidelines explain that the enve-lopes that wrapped around these industrial strength structureswere either thick masonry bearing walls with large punchedopenings or expressed structural frames with full bay infillwindow walls. The former allowed for traditional revivalist stylingwith applied stone and terra cotta ornamentation, while the latterreflects a modern functionalism. While no architectural styledominates, what is consistent is this robust character of materi-als and construction systems combined with an industrial scaleof components, windows, and details. The environment is atonce richly diverse yet authentically industrial.

Third Ward Parking

Milwaukee Public Market

Chicago Housing

San Diego Housing

Georgetown Office/ Retail

Third Ward Lofts/ Retail Third Ward Office/ Pub

Third Ward Office/ Lofts

Design Principle: The Historic Third Ward’s architecture ex-presses an original economic landscape of industry and com-merce.

Clearly, the strength of image in the Third Ward derives fromits industrial workplace aesthetic. New buildings are encour-aged to emulate these unique qualities.

Page 21: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d B u i l d i n g s W i t h i n t h e U r b a n F r a m e w o r k

CHARACTER

3534

design themes - urban residential design themes - urban mixed useCHARACTER

Cities chronicle architectural movements which adds to theirrichness and diversity over time. The Third Ward’s revivalist,modern functionalist, and post modern (1980’s-90’s) facadesexpress this variety.

The progressive image of the Third Ward suggests an aggres-sive contemporary approach to new architecture. The existingguidelines concurred, requesting that, “...new buildings fitcomfortably into the District yet express their individuality andtime.”

Though new commercial office development may at some pointreturn the extension of the neighborhood beyond the HistoricDistrict is presently driven by multiple family housing types andmixed use development. While the housing is often based ondouble loaded corridor types and townhouses, a variation, thecontemporary urban loft, has emerged.

Japan Housing/ Retail Japan Housing/ Retail

Hotel/Cafe

Madison Housing / Office

Design Guideline: Residential buildingtypes shall enrich the street with individualstreet entrances for each ground/first levelunit.

Combining the American ideal of owning a new home with theappeal of Historic Industrial Loft living, this loft phenomena mayin part be responsible for the renewed interest in urban living.The architectural implications are exciting and the Third Ward isa natural location. This new loft type is being explored interna-tionally by architects from Finland to Australia, from Japan to theNetherlands. The universal intention, contemporary architecturecreating activated urban streets, is encouraged in this neighbor-hood. In order to achieve this, as discussed in the first section ofthese guidelines, ground floor architectural expression and useare critical. Mixing unit types or mixing in commercial space hasproven to be a successful design and development strategy.

Philadelphia Townhouses- Modern

Milwaukee- Traditional

San Diego Townhouses- Contemporary

European Minimalism

Design Principle: Well designed residential building typesestablish the fabric of the city and transform city streets intosustainable neighborhoods.

Though functional and efficient dwelling units with marketableamenities are critical to successful urban housing, the streetsthese buildings define must be enriched with semipublictransition spaces to bring the neighborhood to life.

Contemporary architectural expression of urban residentialbuilding types integrating outdoor transition spaces isencouraged.

Page 22: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d B u i l d i n g s W i t h i n t h e U r b a n F r a m e w o r k

CHARACTER

3736

Design Guideline: Existing low-rise manu-facturing buildings or low-rise portions ofbuildings should be agressively redesignedto add visual interest to the street.

Recently, however, a number of west coast architects haveproduced some remarkably creative adaptive reuse prototypesfor this building type. A number of examples are included above.The compelling aspects include dramatic juxtapositions of newarchitectural/sculptural features within the previously unadornedindustrial fabric.

design themes - low-rise industrial reuse landmark sitesCHARACTER

Design Guideline: Signature buildings forlandmark sites need only comply with theguidelines on pages 8, 17, 19, 23, 38, 46, 49, 51,and 62.

New Window Wall New Elements

Third Ward

Layering

Mixed Materials

Transparency Adds Interest

Design Principle: High demolition costs may warrant anadaptive reuse/renovation redevelopment approach.

In the last half of the 20th century, industrial building typesshifted strongly to steel structural systems withpremanufactured modular components. The Ward has anumber of these lowrise buildings to the east of the historiccore. They offer little to enhance the pedestrian environmentof the street.

Design Principle: There exists two kinds of buildings in the city:Those that make up the city’s urban fabric and landmark,signature buildings.

Some of the requirements within these guidelines may besuspended at the Architectural Review Board’s discretion, if thesite is identified within the Third Ward Neighborhood Compre-hensive Plan as a landmark site suited for a signature building.Signature buildings shall achieve a unique contemporary designof the highest standards.

They will be evaluated by the ARB based upon a point systemweighted by each Board member according to these criteria:Max. Points2525

2525Projects require an ARB average score of 90 or more forapproval.

CriteriaResponsiveness to nine Guidelines above;Design Firm’s commitment to design quality,as represented by a National or three StateDesign Awards in the past 5 years;Quality of Enclosure / Materials Systems;Overall Appeal of Project as a Landmark.

Twin Church Gateway-Rome

Weisman Museum-Minneapolis Luxor Theater-Rotterdam

High Rise

Page 23: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d B u i l d i n g s W i t h i n t h e U r b a n F r a m e w o r k

CHARACTER

39

Design Principle: Buildings in a traditional city pattern havefronts and backs.

Buildings in the Historic Third Ward are organized in a typicalgrid of streets and blocks with primary streets running northand south, and secondary streets running east and west.Service alleys generally divide the blocks and are enteredfrom the secondary streets.

Building fronts face the street, define the public space of thestreet, and form the major public entrances.

38

Design Guideline: Major facades and en-trances should face the major streets, (andriver). Access to service bays and to parkingshould be from secondary streets or alleys.

Building sides and backs, which face minor streets and alleys,respectively, are used primarily for service

Historically, corner buildings at street intersections often respondedto both streets by providing corner entrances emphasized by robustdecorative columns.

New buildings should acknowledge this characteristic orientation,thereby contributing to the traditional clarity of public street frontswhile appropriately placing service access.

street facades diversity

Main Facade Fronts Major Street

Service Bay on AlleyService Alley

Service Bay on Secondary Street

Service Bay on Alley

Design Guideline: Design diversity is requiredfor large (block long) parcels.

Design Principle: “...*More buildings along a given length ofstreet contribute more than do fewer buildings.”

The Historic District exhibits a pattern of building development overtime. The earliest development is represented by multiple buildingsalong a block face. Later, the block-long facade appeared alongthe river. The earlier pattern is favored as more interesting, morediverse, “*All of the best streets...exhibit many buildings...” In thelong term, diverse developments are more sustainable, moreresilient and accomodating in the face of change. “ Excerpt from Great Streets by Allan B. Jacobs

New Housing Lacks Diversity

New Diverse Housing Facades

Facade Diversity

Large developments from New York’s Battery Park City toFlorida’s new towns have insured diversity by commissioningmultiple design architects engaged for separate buildings.

Retains Historic Corner

Page 24: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d B u i l d i n g s W i t h i n t h e U r b a n F r a m e w o r k

CHARACTER

41

The portion of the Historic Third Ward that makes contact withthe edge of the Milwaukee River offers a unique opportunity fora dramatically different, water-oriented pedestrian environment.The 1986 Master Plan proposed a two level riverwalk conceptwith lower level boat and water-oriented activities and upperlevel economic opportunities for cafes, entertainment, and retailuse.

40

Design Guideline: Riverfront facades shouldfollow the design guidelines established forstreet facades while embracing the designcharacter of the publicly accessible riverwalks.

The development of the riverfront also presents opportunities fornew construction. The new development should respect thecharacter and spirit of the Historic Third Ward developmentpattern and buildings for both existing buildings and new.Therefore, all the river facades are subject to the guidelines inthis publication.

In addition, physical and aesthetic continuity of the Historic ThirdWard riverwalk is advised.

For Riverwalk details, see the Appendix to this document.

riverfront facades

The character of this river edge and of the alterations to the existingadjacent building facades will be more dependent upon theproposed new use, access requirements, the structural conditionof existing buildings, and the need for natural light penetration thanthe traditional back facade character these buildings currentlydisplay. The new riverfront facades should take care to avoid thesterility often resulting from major new construction. It isrecommended that new proposals retain as much of the existingbuilding as is possible.

Riverfront Facades Connection Point

Philadelphia Townhouses- ModernRiverwalk Frontagen

Amsterdam New Loft Housing

Mixed-Use Prototype Cross-Section

Amsterdam New Loft Housing

Design Guideline: Adjacent private propertydeveloping a connection to the Riverwalkshould reflect use of materials and detailsthat are found on the Historic Third WardRiverwalk.

Page 25: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d B u i l d i n g s W i t h i n t h e U r b a n F r a m e w o r k

DESIGN COMPOSITION

43

Design Principle: Emulating the human body, one of the tenetsof architectural composition is the idea of a building having abase, middle, and a top. This has been borne out in the historyof architecture for thousands of years.

Buildings in the District clearly display this characteristic. Thetop of the building terminates the building against the sky; themiddle abstractly communicates the building’s function or use;and the base firmly anchors the building to the ground at thesame time presenting a close range interface with people. It isespecially important in the Historic District that new buildingsadhere to this tripartite composition.

42

Design Guideline: The architectural compo-sition of building elevations shall expressbase, middle, and top articulation on allstreet facades.

base, middle, top

skyline

expression line

street level

expression line

TOP

MIDDLE

BASE

The transition between the base and the middle or between themiddle and the top are often articulated by the use of contrastingmaterials or ornamental projecting elements. These horizontalbands on buildings form expression lines that give scale andcharacter to a facade. They become important clues for similarexpression lines on adjacent new buildings.

Existing Building/ New Storefront New ConstructionExisting Building/ New TopHistoric District Example

Two Story Seven Story

Page 26: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d 45B u i l d i n g s W i t h i n t h e U r b a n F r a m e w o r k

Pattern of Existing Parapets

Design Guideline: The top of the street facadeshould be articulated to provide a uniquesilhouette to the building when seen from thestreet level.

The adjacent drawings were all prepared from photographs ofexisting buildings in the Third Ward. The pattern of parapetson the street facade was one of two concepts for completingthe building’s top. The projecting cornice was the other. Thearchitects or builders of these structures found an opportunityfor expressing individuality by varying these features.

Where projecting cornices create an element which terminatesthe building wall, the articulated parapet seeks to caress andinterlock with the sky.

New buildings should interpret one of these conditions forcompleting the facade of the building.

DESIGN COMPOSITIONroofs

Design Guideline: Gabled roof forms shallnot be expressed on the street facade.

Flat, sloping roofed buildings predominate in the Historic Third Ward.The commercial or industrial structures were generally wider thanresidential buildings. They spanned this greater distance withinternal column and beam structural systems which created flatroofs with a slight slope to the rear of the building.

Few wood-framed pitched or gabled roof buildings survived thelate nineteenth century fires. The disasters also destroyed manyof the residential properties which had pitched roofs. The presentcharacter of the District is a setting where the expression of pitchedroofs with ridge lines on the street facade is out of character. Suchroofs should be avoided.

Examples of Ornamented Skyline

44

silhouette

Ornamented Parapet

Inappropriate Pitched Roof Form

Appropriate Decorated Parapet Wall

Inappropriate Gabled Roof Form

Design Principle: The Third Ward differs from otherneighborhoods by virtue of its buildings having almost exclusivelyparapet constrruction with flat roofs.

Design Principle: A building’s top expression can be relatively easilyachieved by unique parapet articulation , thus adding designdiversity along the street.

Page 27: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d

D E S I G N COMPOSITIONrhythm

47B u i l d i n g s W i t h i n t h e U r b a n F r a m e w o r k

Design Principle: New buildings shouldexpress a structural rhythm on the streetfacade consistent with that of the existinghistoric buildings.

Design Principle: In architectural composition, rhythm refers to theregular or harmonious recurrence of building elements.

With respect to Third Ward facades, the most obvious recurringfacade elements are structural bays demarcated by robust masonrycolumns. The patterns of repetition utilized varies from building tobuilding resulting in a variety of visual rhythms. The simplest is aneven spacing of repetitive columns, but often the end bays weregiven special identity by varying their width to be either wider ornarrower than typical bays.

46

Expressed Structural Rhythm 15’-25’

Within the Historic Third Ward such underlying ratios are evident.The structural columns that dominate most facades establish abuilding bay module with a greater height than width that creates avertical proportion. This same ratio is then transferred to otherfacade elements (windows, for example to further emphasize theoverall vertical pattern).

The diagonal lines on the drawing above are virtually parallelindicating the similarity of proportion between the several parts ofthe building. These regulating lines can be used to verify therelationships between facade elements.

Design Guideline: Each structural bay of thestreet facade should have a vertical propor-tion (the height of the grid is greater than thewidth of the grid).

proportion

Consistent Proportions on Existing Facade

Design Principle: Proportion is the numeric ratio of two opposingdimensions of a form or space such as height to width, width todepth, etc. The intent of all theories of proportion is to create asense of order among elements of a building.

For example, in designing a building facade, a proportioningsystem can be established that is based on a characteristic ratiothat is reflected in the individual elements, the spaces betweenelements, and groupings of the elements. The same proportionmay also be evident in the overall ratios of the whole facade,thus a harmony of parts to the whole.

Varied Bay Widths

Sometimes structural rhythm relates to special functionalrestraints of the buildings use. This causes more complexsyncopated rhythms. The variation of rhythm from building tobuilding reaffirms the individuality of each building while thereoccurrence of the robust structural piers helps unify the Districtas a family of similar structures.

Bays Create Visual Interest Rhythms in Existing Buildings on Broadway Street

Page 28: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d B u i l d i n g s W i t h i n t h e U r b a n F r a m e w o r k

DESIGN COMPOSITION

48

Design Guideline: The majority of the sur-face of the base of the building on the streetfacade should be transparent (see page 20).Inversely, the majority (over 50%) of thesurface area above the base should be appearsolid or translucent, (also see page 18).

solid and void

The resultant solid to void relationship is characterized by the lowerfloor having a majority of its surface as void or window, and theupper floors having a majority of their surface as solid or brick.

New construction should respect this historic solid to void surfaceconfiguration, generally providing retail use at the street level withcommercial or more private, residential uses on the upper floors.

Elevation Showing Relationship of Window to Wall

A large percentage of the Historic Third Ward’s major streetfacades are constructed of brick with the upper floors supportedon a structural element located above the first floor windows.This has resulted in large glass areas for the ground levelstorefronts and smaller, so called punched openings in the brickof the upper floor for general fenestration.

49

Design Guideline: The base of the buildingshould include elements that relate to thehuman scale. These should include doors andwindows, projections, columns, awnings andcanopies, ornament, etc.

Design Principle: Elements that mediate between the overall sizeof a building and the size of a person, give it human scale.

Human scale in architecture is based on the human body. It is verycommon to rely on visual clues to get a sense of how big a buildingor space is by relating the overall dimension to some knowndimension. Such elements as steps, doors, door hardware, etc.,help people judge the size of a building.

Scale Elements at Entry

scale

This recognition of human scale permeates the Third Ward’solder buildings so that people feel comfortable in close proximityto them. It is desirable to retain and enhance this characteristicand to incorporate the lessons from the buildings of an earlierera into new design.

To achieve this, it is important to articulate building entrancesand other parts of the base of the buildings with elements thatpeople can relate to.

Design Principle: Flat, unadorned repetitive curtainwall facadeslack visual interest and contribute little to the visual interest ofthe street wall.

Page 29: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d B u i l d i n g s W i t h i n t h e U r b a n F r a m e w o r k

DESIGN COMPOSITION

51

Design Principle: Consistent with the historical context, heightvariance from building to building supports individual designexpression and diversity (see page 39).

For a variety of reasons, buildings in the Historic Third Ward areof different heights. This characteristic could be attributed to adesire for individual expression, to avoid constructioncomplications in joining two adjoining buildings, or as a naturalresult of slight difference in floor-to-floor heights.

50

Design Guideline: New buildings should notbe equal in height to adjacent buildings.

neighboring structures - height

Design Guideline: Expression lines derivedfrom adjacent structures shall be integratedinto the design of new street facades.

Design Principle: While diversity is desirable, respect for commontraits and expression lines creates order and unifies the streetblockface.

Floor-to-floor heights and overall building heights of structure inthe District are invariably different due to the variety of originaluses of the buildings.

However, as a result of the traditional attention paid to conceptssuch as base, middle, and top, there exists strong horizontalexpression or architectural control lines throughout the District.These lines should be respected for all new construction.

Expression Lines on Existing Buildings

This skyline characteristic was also the result of individual buildingsof a basically vertical nature having been built side by side overtime.

To further reinforce this characteristic new buildings should not bebuilt at the same height as their neighbors. This design objectivenot only strives to maintain the skyline character of the District butalso to offer new building projects the opportunity for individualexpression.

Careful analysis of adjacent facades will provide numeroushorizontal generating lines which, when carried over to newconstruction, will ensure continuity of character, and acompatability that connects the ‘new’ to the District’s historicfacades.

It is not the intent of this principle that expression lines fromone building to the next align exactly. It is desirable however,that the spirit of adjacent facades be adapted for new infillproposals.

Chicago Street Water Street Expression Lines Carried Over Expression Lines Derived from Adjacent Buildings

Broadway

Diversity in Building Height

neighboring structures - expression lines

Page 30: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d

FORM

52

Design Guideline: The height of buildingswithin the Historic District shall be containedwithin the range of 70% to 130% of adjacenthistoric building heights along the street edge,but not less than three stories (30 feet).

facade height

Height of New Facades

130% of higher building

70%of lower building butnot less than 30 feet

range ofheight

Design Principle: Strong neighborhood identity is reinforced by acommonality of building forms referred to as an urban fabric.

The height of buildings in the Neighborhood varies widely fromone story to ten stories. By relating the indicated percentages tothe historic buildings a general continuity of height at the streetedge is maintained. This will preserve the perceived scale of thebuildings and extend the harmony of street spaces that exist withinthe Historic District. Buildings extending through to adjacentstreets shall conform on each street.

B u i l d i n g s W i t h i n t h e U r b a n F r a m e w o r k 53

Design Principle: “ On the whole, adjacent buildings should beroughly the same height.”*

* Excerpt from A Pattern Language, by Christopher Alexander.

Tower Set Back - Madison

Design Guideline: The height of buildingsoutside the Historic District shall complywith the guidelines on page 14.

Historic District Corner Sites: For sites on intersecting rights ofway of different widths the ARB will entertain a greaterbuilding height up to the lesser adjacent street width if ofexceptional design quality and if building massing transitionsto lower existing structures.

Exception: See page 37, Landmark Sites

infill sites

Design Guideline: Street edge continuityshall be re-established by infill developmentof vacant sites.

The urban quality of the District has much to do with the nature ofthe street. The key to this is the notion that building facades containspace. This is in contrast to the suburban or rural pattern oflandscapes containing buildings.

Where buildings once stood within the Historic District, a numberof vacant sites have been created. To re-establish the quality ofthe street these sites should be filled with new buildings of similarheight and scale

Existing Vacant Sites

Undesirable Development

Undesirable DevelopmentDesirable Infill of Vacant Site

Design Principle: Missing building fronts along a blockfacedisrupts the quality of street as a place by allowing theenclosed space to leak out.

infill site

edge discontinued edge complete

infill too low appropriate infillon the street edge

infill too high

Page 31: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d B u i l d i n g s W i t h i n t h e U r b a n F r a m e w o r k 55

FORMexposed sides of buildings

Design Guideline: Where city ordinances andstate building codes allow, side elevations onopen sites should be treated as a facade com-patible with the street facade.

Design Principle: Many structures within the Historic District havebeen razed. This has resulted in the exposure of the sides or partywalls of the remaining buildings. These sides were not designedto be seen from the public streets and so were utilitarian in nature,generally unfinished in character, and often built with no windowsor doors.

54

Design Guideline: New rear additions or rearfacade modifications should be compatiblewith the historic character of the originalfacade.

potentially interesting secondary public places reminiscent ofsuccessfully revitalized areas in other American cities or in Europeancities.

To successfully develop these areas it is important to retain notonly the volumetric character of the space, but to further enhancethe exposed surfaces with some of the same visual richness whichprevails throughout the rest of the District.

back facades

Design Principle:This guideline does not suggest a repetition ofthe street architecture. Compatible designs which are clean,simple, and functional, and of a modern attitude could be equallyappropriate.

Particular care and attention is necessary when makingmodification to improve service access to the rear of buildingsor to improve loading dock facilities. Any such modificationsshall maintain the essential character of the building and makeuse of materials similar to those used in the historic building.

There are several mid-block areas within the District as definedin the 1987 master plan where the rear areas of buildings form

The interior and exterior public places thus created, offeropportunities for a variety of exciting new uses such as cafes, shops,and building additions with arcades, atria, and multi-level retailspaces.

As the trend to adaptively reuse existing buildings for residentialand other purposes continues, and if infill building on the vacantsite is not anticipated, side faces will likely be altered. In thesecircumstances, the design of side facades should be carefullyconsidered with respect to the street facade. This does notimply that the side facade should attempt to replicate the streetfacade but that they should be visually organized and unified.This may involve painting or other surface treatment.

Where new sidewall openings are created, respect for existinglintel heights, floor lines, window proportions, window type, andscale should be evident.

Existing Back Facade Original Messy Sidewall Painted Sidewall

Resurfaced SidewallOrganized Fenestration of SidewallRedevelopment Cross Section

Alley Space Network

Page 32: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d

balconies

56

Design Guideline: Within the BID District#2, the addition of projecting balconies tostreet facades of pivotal or contributingbuildings (see page 28) is prohibited.

--Individual balconies should fit within a vertical bay of thefacade.--Consistent with their functional history, balconies should be5-6 feet deep, and allow space for several people.

Design options for integrating balconies into new buildingfacade composition are far greater in number than for fittingthem to existing facades.

By following the criteria below and the preceding railing criteria,proposed balconies can be approached but should not negativelydetract from or overwhelm the visual qualities of the street facades.

FORM

B u i l d i n g s w i t h i n t h e U r b a n F r a m e w o r k 57

Acceptable Side or Rear Facade

Unacceptable Facade Alteration

Design Principle: The historic facades of the Third Wardare a limited and precious resource.

Design Guideline: For new construction,balconies shall be recessed or semi-recessedinto the street facades.

Design Principle: Balconies provide an opportunity toanimate the street setting and provide for informal surveil-lance of the street and therefore contribute to makingstreets safer.

--Proposed balcony additions shall not require the removal or inany way obscure or destroy existing facade ornament.

Recent residential conversion of some important (pivotalor contributing), historic buildings in the District have yieldedunsatisfactory facade alterations. In some instancesapplied balconies dominate the facades. In addition, theinstallation of balcony doors has permanently altered thefacades fenetration pattern. In the worst cases historicfacade ornament was sacraficed . These unfortunateresults are convincing evidence that protection of historicstreet facade features is crucial to the neighborhood.

Since balconies have become almost a required amenity ofurban residential living units, their location on side and rear,non-street facades of historic buildings, will be considered (seepage 57). Here they may add much needed interest to blankwalls. The following criteria apply:

Acceptable Recessed and Partially Recessed Balconies

--Balcony railings should compliment the scale characteristicsof the existing building and attachments shall be well integratedand carefully crafted.

From the larger context these physical amenities shouldenhance and add interest to the building’s street facades. Theyshould not by virtue of size and number screen or become thefacade. Greater than 25% of overlaid area on street facades isprohibited.

Open Sidewall Balconies

Recessed

Page 33: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d

The additions should also respect the expressed rhythm of thefacade.Additions should compliment the scale characteristics of the existingbuilding.Addition facades should adopt the proportions of the existing facade.

New construction penthouses should comply with Guidelines onpages 44 and 45.

penthouse additions

Unoccupied roof access or mechanical equipment additions topivitol historic buildings should not be visible from the sidewalkacross the street from the main building facades.

In the larger context these physical interventions should enhanceand add interest from the point of view of both skyline androofscape appearance or from the point of view of enhancedstreet enclosure consistent with the guideline on page 14.

vertical facade extensions

59

Design Guideline: Consistent with theGuideline for renovations and additions,(page 60), penthouse additions or additionsthat vertically extend the building’s facadesshall be respectful of the buildings existingstreet facades.Design Principle: Penthouse additions or vertical facadeextensions, increasingly popular in urban housing develop-ment of industrial loft building renovations, can contributevisual interest to urban settings.

FORM

58

Occupied penthouse additions to pivitol historic structures shall besetback from the street facades such that the integrity of the historicstreet facade is seen as a separate volume from any new additionto the existing building. Two story penthouses may require a greatersetback.

New Setback Penthouse

Design Guideline: Vertical extension of fa-cades classified as pivitol by the historic dis-trict designation is prohibited, see page 28.

By following the following design criteria, vertical modificationscan be approached but should not negatively detract from oroverwhelm the visual quality of the Third Ward’s historic streetfacades. A clear visual break should occur between new andhistoric.

Unacceptable: IncompatiblePenthouses Not Visible From Street Penthouse Enhances Skyline

Consistent with the functional history of these roof forms penthouseadditions should be simple and understated and avoid any attemptto mimic ornamented street facades.

Acceptable

Not Well-Integrated

B u i l d i n gs w i t h i n t h e U r b a n F r a m e w o r k

Page 34: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d B u i l d i n g s wi t h i n t h e U r b a n F r a m e w o r k

DESIGN PRINCIPLES

6160

Design Guideline: New additions or modifi-cations to an existing building should beconsistent in rhythm, proportion, and scalewith the existing buildings.

Just as it is important to consider adjacent buildings when addingan infill building to a vacant site, additions to existing historicbuildings require the same consideration of expression lines;building heights, base, middle and top composition; and of rhythm,proportion, and scale.

This does not imply exact replication of the building facade butrather provides a basis for establishing visual continuity whileallowing a modern interpretation of material, detail, and ornament.

Sensitive Addition: Iron BlockBuilding, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

renovations and additions

Design Principle: Attempting to replicate an existing historicalfacade when creating a new addition, often devalues the qualityof the original building.

Contemporary Approach

Post-Modern Approach Modernist Approach

Page 35: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d B u i l d i n g s wi t h i n t h e U r b a n F r a m e w o r k

DESIGN PRINCIPLES

63

New mechanical equipmentWhen new mechanical equipment must be located on roofs ofbuildings it should not be visible from the side of the street oppositethe building.

Pieces of mechanical equipment, skylights, and other elements ofthe building that are exposed on the roof are anticipated andacceptable. All elements that are visible on the roof should bearranged in an orderly manner, particularly if the roof can be viewedfrom surrounding buildings.

62

Design Guideline: Elevator motor rooms,water tank structure, etc. are essential compo-nents of the Historic Third Ward characterand should be retained if structurally sound.

Many existing historic buildings in the District have original fireescapes and standpipes. In several historic Tax Act projects, thebuilding owners have been required by the National Park Serviceto repair and maintain these elements. In other remodelingprojects where these same items are to be saved, they shall bemaintained and painted in as neutral and as non-intrusive amanner as possible.

mechanical and safety equipment

In so far as possible, new utility services shall be installedunderground. Metering devices and other mechanical itemsshall be located at the side or rear of the building. Location ofthese items on the front facade of the building is highlydiscouraged.

There remains in the District numerous examples of originalrooftop mechanical elements such as sprinkler system watertanks, water tank structures, and elevator equipment rooms.

Together with the historic facades, ghost signs, typical fixedawnings, and corner columns these elements maintain a link tothe past, and as such are a vital part of the character of theDistrict. Such elements are often an integral part of the structureof the building and need to be maintained in good physicalcondition to avoid damage to other components of the building.

Design Guideline: Exterior fire escapes,ladders, standpipes, vents, etc. should bewell maintained and painted to blend withthe color of the building or painted black.

Design Guideline: Utility meters, exhaustvents, etc. should be unobtrusive and are bestlocated at the side or rear of the building.

Interesting Tank Support

Tank Silhouette Tacky Conduit

Tanks

Visual Screening From Street

Design Principle: Unique historic rooftop elements continue tobe an important visual part of the District skyline.

Design Guideline: Screening of new rooftopHVAC units is required.

Design Principle: Utility and safety equipment on building facadesshould be inconspicuous and go unnoticed.

Exhaust Vent

Fire Department Standpipe

Manufacturer’s Processing Equipment

Fire Escape Hose Connection

Page 36: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d P r e s e r v a t i o n o f N e i g h b o r h o o d Q u a l i t i e s 65

Introduction

As stated in the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards forRehabilitation, “Rehabilitation” is defined as “the process ofreturning a property to a state of utility, through repair or alteration,which makes possible an efficient contemporary use whilepreserving those portions and feature of the property which aresignificant to its historic, architectural, and cultural values.”

Before any changes or additions are made to a historic buildingit is important to thoroughly understand the contribution of theexisting conditions to the integrity of the historic structure.

To this end there is a need for building owners to undertake, orto commission, the necessary research to establish how thebuilding was originally designed and constructed. This shouldbe the starting point for all future changes. These steps shouldlead to a master rehabilitation plan for the building.

The guidelines which make up this section reflect the preservationissues most influenced by incremental changes over time. Theyare generally characterized in building details such as openings,storefronts, signs, and canopies, marquees and awnings.Guidelines are also presented for façade details related to surfacetreatment, ornamentation, painting, and color.

Although many of these alterations would not necessarily requirethe services of an architect, it is strongly recommended thatprofessional design assistance be sought to ensure compliancewith these guidelines. A master rehabilitation plan is stronglyadvised for pivitol and contributing buildings, so that incrementalimprovements are coordinated.

64

Building Facade Details

67

PRESERVATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD QUALITIESbuilding detailsmaterialspublic art

Owner’s Guidelines for Minor Building Improvements and Maintenance

Relative to new construction, reference to these issues of buildingdetails and materials will help insure a good fit into this historic builtcontext. Attention paid to these concepts will also aid in addressingthe broader concerns of Section I Guidelines, pages 18-23 “SocialLife of the Street.”

Page 37: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d

BUILDING DETAILS

67

The wide variety of design, placement, size, and trim make win-dows one of the more highly visible architectural elements withinthe Historic Third Ward. Windows should be preserved andprotected against insensitive alteration and elimination. Theproper handling of windows and their interior and exterior trimcan add substantially to the quality of building rehabilitation.

66

Design Guideline: The replacement of win-dows and window openings should replicatethe original configuration of solid (structure)to void (window).

Existing windows and window openings should be retained. Thisshould include the window sash, clear glass, lintel, sill, architraves,pediment, hood, and all hardware. Owners of buildings whosewindows or window openings have been altered in the past toreduce the glass area or to provide larger picture windows shall beencouraged to restore these openings to their original sizes.

The original proportion of wall openings should be retained. Theblocking of existing openings to accommodate standard sash andwindow sizes, to hide ceilings lowered beneath the tops of existingwindows, or for any other reason is not permitted.

windows and window openings

Design Guideline: The blocking up of windowopenings or any portion of the window openingon the street facade is not permitted.

Design Guideline: All window air conditionersshall be relegated to secondary facades of thebuilding.

Design Guideline: New street facades shouldemulate the large scale window openingsprevalent in the Historic District’s commercialbuildings.

Historically, a range of different window treatments were used inthe area. In the early 19th century, multi-paned, double hung woodsashes were used with simple sills and lintels of wood or stone. Inthe latter 19th century and early 20th century, larger pieces of glassbecame readily available as did more ornately fashioned sills andlintels of carved wood, cast iron, and cut stone.

Modifications to exisitng window openings and components mustbe carefully considered and will be closely scrutinized by the ARB.

Replacement windows should duplicate the original in designand materials. Tinted glass is unacceptable.

When necessary, aluminum windows used for replacementshould match the robust cross section and color of originalcomponents. Natural or unfinished aluminum coloration is notrecommended in historic building renovations.

Historic Configuration Enlarged Opening- Prohibited

Different Configuration- Unacceptable Tinted and/or Undivided- ProhibitedSmaller Windows- Prohibited Partially Blocked Opening - Prohibited

Blocked Opening- Unacceptable

Enlarged/ Original

Tinted/ Undivided

Prohibited Modifications

Large Window Openings Encouraged

The neighborhood’s commercial buildings have large windows.All new construction should incorporate predominantly largewindow openings into the facade compostition.

Large Window Openings

P r e s e r v a t i o n o f N e i g h b o r h o o d Q u a l i t i e s

Page 38: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d

BUILDING DETAILS

69

of buildings whose doors and door openings have been altered inthe past to reduce or enlarge the door openings shall be encouragedto restore these openings to their original size.

The original proportion of door openings should be retained. Theblocking of existing openings to accommodate standard framesand doors is not permitted.

68

doors and door openings

The proximity of doors and door openings to the user makedoors a highly visible architectural element. Although closelyrelated in size to human proportions, the doors of buildings inthe Historic Third Ward are often oversized and appear inproportion to the building as a whole. The oversizing of doorscombined with a richness of detail, the panelizing of the door,the incorporation of glass lites, and substantial and decorativehardware, established a scale relationship with the user.

New development projects should maximize the number of doorsand entrance transitions slong public ways.

Design Guideline: Doors and adjacenttransoms or sidelights should display the samecharacteristics and scale as the original. Theblocking-in of door openings is prohibited.

garage doors

Design Guideline: Garage doors along publicstreets are discouraged, but where necessaryshould add visual interest much like entrancedoors.

BUILDING DETAILS

Every effort should be made to avoid private automobile parkingand parking entrances from along public streets.

Garage doors, however, are in some instances ineveitable. Theseentries should receive the same careful design attention as otherfacade elements. It is preferable that they be relocated to alleylocations . However, should it become necessary to locate themalong public streets they should be understated or recessed, yetstill carefully designed. Transparent doors are preferred.

Fine Materials

Retained Unused Entry

Quality Materials and Detialing

Preferred Transparent Door

Integrated with Facade DesignStreet Townhouse SolutionLacks OrnamentProhibited Board UpInappropriate Fit

Historic Configuration

Existing doors and door openings shall be retained, includingthe door frames, transoms, sidelights, glass panels, lintels, sills,steps, architraves, pediments, hoods and all hardware. Owners

Design Guideline: Doors along public ways arebut one component of entrance transitions.Overhead protection, grade transition, andornamentation shall be included in anyconsideration of doors and door openings.

P r e s e r v a t i o n o f N e i g h b o r h o o d Q u a l i t i e s

Page 39: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d

BUILDING DETAILS

71

Visual richness depends on the presence of visual contrasts inthe storefront surface. At close range richness must be achievedby small-scale elements and subdivisions. Historic storefrontsin the Third Ward are characterized by a balance betweencomplexity and simplicity together with materials andconstruction techniques appropriate to the historic character ofthe District.

Typical of historic storefronts is the presence of many designand building elements that reinforce the importance of thestorefront area of the building. These include:

70

storefronts

Design Guideline: New or altered entriesand storefronts should display a visual rich-ness of detail to add interest to the base ofthe building and the street.

entry door to store change of materialsentry door to upper levels ornamentation/detailsstreet number trim/moldingstore windows quoining of edgesbulkhead panels or windows door/window hardwaretransom windows lighting fixturesentry sidelights lighting qualitysteps size of openingcanopies depth of entranceawnings multiple entrancessigns layering of materials

ornamentation

lightingsign

transom

street number

name

depth of entrance

entry doorquoining of edges

steps

Below-Many Elements - Good Relationships

Richness of Traditional Storefront

Historic Storefront Configuration Blank Walls Prohibited

Prohibited Blocked Up Front

Design Guideline: Blocking up of storefrontopenings is prohibited. Blank street facadesare prohibited.

Storefronts of new buildings should exhibit increased rich-ness and ornamentation consistent with the building’sarchitecture. This might include new, non-traditional ele-ments or construction technologies.

Many Unrelated Elements

Many Elements Well-Composed

Above- Unattractive Mix

name of store window displayssitting wall entry rampshandrailings planters & vegetation

P r e s e r v a t i o n o f N e i g h b o r h o o d Q u a l i t i e s

Page 40: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d 7372

In the many fine storefront examples above, richness dependson the number of visual elements present in each storefrontand on the relationships between them. As the number ofelements in a given storefront increases so does richness.

By the time a storefront contains about five elements, there isplenty of choice of things to look at so the surface seems rich.However, when the number of elements exceeds about nine,care must be taken to avoid visual confusion.

The number of elements is important, but is equally critical that theelements works together, that they are well proportioned, that theyare compatible in style, material, texture, and color, and that theyare carefully detailed.

For historic buildings preservation by replication is preferred,contemporary interpretations, perhaps relating to the business type,are possible. However, such proposals will be closely evaluatedby the Architectural Review Board.

BUILDING DETAILSstorefronts

Security grills and grates on storefront windows and doors portraya negative image that is detrimental to the neighborhood as a safeplace to visit, work, shop, and live. Architectural iron work consistentwith the particular building’s facade style and character may in somecases be an acceptable alternative subject to approval by theArchitectural Review Board and compliance with city codes andordinances.

BUILDING DETAILS

Design Guideline: Fixed, collapsible and rollingsecurity grills and gates are prohibited on streetand riverfront display windows and doors.

security grills and gates

Finely Crafted Security Gate

Ornamental Grill

Prohibited Security GrillProhibited Gate

P r e s e r v a t i o n o f N e i g h b o r h o o d Q u a l i t i e s

Page 41: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d

BUILDING DETAILS

75

image of a district, adding variety and liveliness to both buildingfacades and streetscapes. A thematic approach includes suchcommonly shared considerations as sign message, location, size,color and lighting.

Sign MessageBusiness signs should only include the formal name of thebusiness, the nature of the business, and the address. Advertisingof brand names is discouraged. Avoid an accumulation of serviceclub affiliations, credit card decals, and other sign clutter.

Building signs should include the name of the building and thestreet address of the property. Professional office buildings maylist the occupants of the building.

74

building signs

Design Principle: Exterior signs should belocated within the base of the building withconcern for the appropriateness of location,size, color, lighting, and design quality.

Sign ordinances are complex and can lead to anoversimplification of the potential visual interest of a city. Signsare an integral part of the commercial character of aneighborhood. At the same time, the lack of any control canlead to visual chaos.

The intent of these guidelines is to allow for great varietywithin some controlling parameters.

1

2

3

7

6

4

8

9

10

5

7

10- Potential Sign Locations

Fluorescent (day-glo) colors are not permitted. There areno other restrictions on color although colors that areevocative of the historic character of the Third Ward arerecommended in the Historic District.

Illumination:No back-lit, flashing, or moving signs are permitted.***

Style and size of letters:There are many letter styles available. The primary letteringstyles used on 19th century signs were serifed. These arestrongly recommended in the Historic District. However, a letterstyle should be chosen that is easy to read and that representsthe image of the business it is presenting. The maximum heightof the letters shall not exceed 75% of the height of thebackground on which they appear.

Color:It is recommended that colors that are compatible with thecoloration of the building facade and the nature of the businessbe chosen. No more than three colors should be used, pluswhite, black or an accent color. Fewer colors is fine.

Sign Location and size:Signs shall be located on the spandrel panel of the buildingimmediately above the storefront, within the transom of thedoor or storefront, on door or window glass, on wall areasadjacent to the door, on the valance/skirt of awnings, or onprojecting signs hung within the base zone of the building.

7- Letter Size

11- Commercial Character

3- Individual Image

4- Business Signs Convey Info.

6- Building Occupant List

The base of the building is the most visible part of the buildingfor both pedestrians and motorists. To be effective, signs mustcall attention to the business and create an individual imagefor the store. But signs also contribute to the overall

8- Color Compatibility

9- Prohibited Illumination

3- Individual Image

12- Visual Chaos

5- Building Signs Convey Info.

P r e s e r v a t i o n o f N e i g h b o r h o o d Q u a l i t i e s

Page 42: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d 77

Brackets and other methods of attachment shall beconsidered part of the design proposal and should bedesigned to be interesting and compatible with thebuilding or business. These brackets are controlled bythe City of Milwaukee Code of Ordinances. Allprojecting signs shall be anchored to resist destabilizingby wind action.

All projecting signs should be externally lit. Externallight sources should be shielded from viewers on thestreet to prevent glare.

No internally-lit, flashing, or moving projecting signs arepermitted.***

76

building signs

Signs used inside of and unattached to the display windows mayhave opaque, translucent, or transparent backgrounds and shouldbe limited to no more than nine square feet in size.

More contemporary versions of this type will be considered ifthey reflect the nature of the business and respect thearchitectural composition of the facade. This sign type shouldbe mounted at eye level on a building column, pilaster, or wall.They should not exceed 75% of the width of the column, pilaster,or wall segment and the sign plaque dimensions should definea proportion similar to other proportions evident in the facade.While one sign plaque per column is preferred, severalbuisnesses could be represented as modules of a systemsubject to ARB approval.

building signsBUILDING DETAILS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

7

8

Display window signs:Display window signs applied directly to the glass shall consistonly of lettering and/or a symbol without an opaque background.On the display window, such a sign shall not cover more thanone fifth of the area of the glass panel.

Window signs should not obscure the display area. The color ofthe letters should contrast with the display background. Lightcolored letters or gold leafed letters with dark borders areeffective.

Spandrel panel signs:The size of signs on the spandrel panel shall be such thatthey can be contained within a structural bay of the building,but shall not exceed twenty feet in width. The height of thesign shall be no more than 75% of the height of the spandrel.

Transom panels signs:Transom area above the door or display windows shall notbe covered by opaque signs or panels. If the transom isbroken down into a number of small panels, sign locationshould respect and not obscure the individual panels. Signsin the transom area shall not exceed 65% of the width of thepanel or 75% of the height of the panel. The height of lettersshall not exceed 18 inches.

Banners/Projecting SignsA projecting sign should be mounted on the structural piers ofthe building. They should project no more than four feet fromthe face of the building. Hanging signs shall be no lowerthan the height above the sidewalk permitted by the BuildingCode and no higher than the base of the building.

Column, Pier, or Wall Signs (Sign Plaques):Exterior signs surface mounted on building columns, piers, or wallsare herein referred to as sign plaques. They are a traditionalornamental sign type very much in keeping with the District ifprepared in metal, stone, or other approved exterior materials.

11

12

13

1- Spandrel Signs

2&3- Transom Signs 7- Pilaster Sign Too Wide 6&7- Sign Plaque Compliments Architecture

4- Transparent Signs in Windows 5- Sign Plaques

8- Banners

10- Hanging Sign

9- Projecting Sign Attached at Structural Piers

12- Appropriate External Illumination

11- Brackets

13-Prohibited Internally Illuminated

***See City codes and ordinances for type B signs.

P r e s e r v a t i o n o f N e i g h b o r h o o d Q u a l i t i e s

Page 43: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d 79

Real estate companies are advised to be aware of theguidelines affecting signage in the Historic Third Ward anddisplay signs in compliance with the guidelines. Signs foundto be noncomplying shall be brought into compliance within30 days. These signs are regarded as limited termapplications and may be reviewed after 6 months

Pre-Existing Noncompliant SignsPreexisting nonconforming signs are grandfathered for alimited period of time but shall not be repainted, resurfaced,or otherwise improved without being brought into compliancewith the design guidelines. Existing non-conforming signageshall be removed as a condition of approval for new signage.The removal of preexisting nonconforming signs shall bemandatory five years from the date these guidelines areratified. Ghost signs shall be the lone exception.

78

building signs

Temporary advertising signs:Temporary advertising signs attached to buildings and displaywindows should be limited to 30 days of display time.

Temporary signs are prohibited on the exterior of buildings. Itis acceptable to display these signs in windows inside of thebuilding.

Banners are temporary, six month, exterior signs subject to theestablished ARB review process. Installations must beapproved.

Real estate company “For Rent” or “For Sale” signs may bemounted prior to ARB review if an application is submittedsimultaneously. The Architectural Review Board will reviewthese applications within 30 days.

Awning signs:Awnings can also serve as signs with contrasting letterspainted or sewn onto the valance or skirt of the awning.Usually six to eight inch letters are sufficient. Lettering onthe main awning area is not permitted, although onebusiness logo in this location could be considered.

building signsBUILDING DETAILS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7 9

6

Street Corner SignsHistorically, street corners are architecturally emphasized.Signage too often marked the corner with vertical emphasis.This sign type shall meet city standards for height fromsidewalk, and ARB standards for brackets and designquality, but will be allowed above the base of the building.

The urban character of the Third Ward neighborhoodsuggests that freestanding signs are undesirable. Thesetypes of signs are typical in suburban conditions, but areprohibited in this urban neighborhood.

Billboard signs are prohibited.

Exceptions: Signature sites and signature (cultural) usesare eligible for exclusion from signage guidelines subjectto the ARB’s discretion.

4

1- Street Corner Signs

8

2- Awning Signs 4- Temporary Signs

3- Logo Location Acceptable 5- Temporary Banner 6- Temporary ‘For Rent’ Sign 7- Pre-existing Noncompliant

9- Prohibited Billboard

8- Prohibited Freestanding

Billboards

P r e s e r v a t i o n o f N e i g h b o r h o o d Q u a l i t i e s

Page 44: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d80

Sandwich Boards: Sidewalk sandwich board signage should becomposed and constructed with care giving consideration toconcept, size, shape, color, graphics, and materials, as well asconveying the sensibility of the business. These portable signsshall be designed to be structurally stable under all wind and weatherconditions and other impact forces. They shall not be braced by orotherwise attached to any other streetscape element, (lamp post,bollard, parking meter, etc.) and shall be removed from the sidewalkduring non-business hours. The size of any one sign face shall notexceed 3 feet wide by 5 feet tall. In addition, sidewalk sandwichboard signage is subject to applicable City of Milwaukee Codesand Ordinances.

81

BUILDING DETAILSsidewalk signage

Banners: The streetscape project has created a uniqueopportunity for advertising. A large number of Third Ward lampposts were designed to allow easy mounting of banners.Streetlight banners can have a strong impact on the image ofthe neighborhood and therefore must be of the highest possibleaesthetic quality. The Historic Third Ward may make availableindividual lamp post locations for promoting events in accordancewith policies and procedures established by the Association.Banners will be reviewed carefully in terms of concept, size,shape, color, graphic impact, materials, and other technicalfactors as well as conveying the name and sensibility of thebusiness or event advertised.

other signs

Design Guideline: The displaying ofmerchandise on public sidewalks is encouragedwhere sidewalk widths permit public circulationand merchandise display.

Displaying of merchandise on public ways is in keeping with theprinciples presented and is a potent “sign” of commercial activity.It encourages pedestrian activity and social life on the street.However, care should be taken to allow a minimum clear passageof 60” for pedestrians including those in wheelchairs. Displaysshould be orderly, attractive and secure under all wind and weatherconditions. Be advised that sidewalk display of merchandise isalso subject to applicable City of Milwaukee Codes and Ordinances.

Design Guideline: Street banners and sidewalksignage shall exhibit professionally designedgraphics.

Streetscape Banners Creative Solutions

Good Graphics Produce Market

Sidewalk DisplayFarmers’ Market

P r e s e r v a t i o n o f N e i g h b o r h o o d Q u a l i t i e s

Page 45: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d82

canopies, marquees, and awnings

Design Guideline: Canopies and awnings shallreflect the door and window openings orstructural bays of the building.

Stationary fabric awnings: An awning of stationary design with apipe or steel tube frame, and covered with fabric.Fixed awnings: A rigid roof-like shelter sloping and draining awayfrom the building.

Canopy types:Canopy: A rigid, flat roof-like structure, sloping and draining towardsthe building.Hoods: A small rigid roof-like structure erected only over theentrance to a building.Marquees: A large rigid, flat roof-like structure erected only overthe entrance to a building.

83

BUILDING DETAILS

Design criteria:Awnings shall be of the traditional sloped configuration rather thancurved, vaulted, or semi-spherical.

Awnings shall be made of canvas or Neoprene impregnated fabric.Vinyl awnings are not permitted.

The underside of an awning shall be open to expose the structure.Soffit panels are not permitted.

Internal lighting of awnings is not permitted.

Standing seam roofs for fixed awnings are preferred tocorrugated metal awnings. Glass or translucent awning roofsare encouraged. Corrugated fiberglass and asphalt or woodshingle fixed awnings or pseudo-mansard roofs are notpermitted.

New buildings are encouraged to consider the inclusion of acanopy, marquee or hood to enhance the entrance bay of abuilding.

All effort should be made to retain and restore existing canopies,hoods, and marquees..

Design Guideline: Awnings and canopies shouldenhance the expression of the building entranceand add a high quality element to the streetscape.

Tradiional Awning

Original Metal Awning Traditional Awning

Contemporary Awning Contemporary Glass Canopy Corner Canopy Contemporary Glass Awning

Entrance Marquee

Design Guideline: For historic buildings, usetraditional shapes and materials typical of theturn of the century.

Canopies, marquees, awnings, and hoods are a typical designfeature found on turn-of-the-century buildings of the District.Canopies and awnings are for the protection of pedestrians andfor the shading of retail windows.

There are several variations of canopies and awnings whichare defined in detail in the Milwaukee Code of Ordinances.These can be summarized as follows:

Awning types:Movable awnings: A retractable, roof-like shelter constructed topermit being rolled, collapsed, or fold back to the facade of thebuilding.

Contemporary Awning New Metal Awning Contemporary AwningAwning Fits Bay

New Fabric Type

Shelters Cafe

P r e s e r v a t i o n o f N e i g h b o r h o o d Q u a l i t i e s

Page 46: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d84

building lighting

Design Guideline: Exterior and facade lightingshall be well-integrated as a design element tomeet the concerns outlined herein.

85

BUILDING DETAILS

Decorative light fixtures should be selected to harmonize withthe building. The size, shape, material, and style of the fixturemust be considered. Building flood and accent lighting fixturesshould be as small and inconspicuous as possible--hidden fromview by existing architectural elements whenever possible. Theplacement of fixtures, along with the lighting pattern and color,must compliment the building.

.

Tradiional Awning

Contemporary Glass Awning

Design Principle: The Third Ward offers a variety of activity atnight. Building lighting offers opportunities to draw attention tobusinesses, to enhance a building facade’s features, and to offersecurity. A carefully studied lighting design can achieve thesegoals, enhancing the District after dark.

Avoid the use of exposed conduit and raceways on the exterior ofthe building. If such elements are unavoidable, place them inlocations that would be least visible to the pedestrian and paintedto match the existing, surrounding materials.

Good color rendition is an important consideration and is a functionof the color of the lamp used. Incadescent and Metal Halide offerthe best color rendition. The type of lamp should be chosen toenhance the building material and color. The use of neon lightingis closely scrutinized and limited to only the most compellingapplications.

.

Minimize glare and spillage from lighting. As with lighting for signs,light sources are to be shielded from direct view. Spillage intoadjacent buildings is undesirable. Light should be directed toenhance and dramatize architectural features.

Effective building lighting design requires technical expertise. Theanticipated effects of a proposed lighting scheme must be carefullystudied and clearly demonstrated visually through the use oftraditional or digital rendering prior to approval. Given the limitationsof graphic representations, adjustments may be required after theinitial installation.

.

Maintenance is a critical element of a building’s lighting. Burnedout lamps or tilted fixtures make the building lighting a detrimentto the building and the District.

Storefronts Light Sidewalk

Lighting Monument

Facade Lighting

Note: Text is edited from original research prepared by Chris Rute.

P r e s e r v a t i o n o f N e i g h b o r h o o d Q u a l i t i e s

Page 47: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d86

surface treatment and finishes

Design Guideline: New construction andalterations to existing buildings in the ThirdWard neighborhood should use materialswhich are sympathetic to the historic industrialcharacter. These materials are typically brick,stone, terra cotta, glass, fabric, and metal.

closely as possible. The use the new masonry material shouldmatch similar materials used elsewhere on the building in texture,color, size, and coursing. The use of materials such as fiberglass,plastic, foam products, stucco or EIFS, concrete block, or concreteformed to imitate either brick or stone is not permitted on facades.Stamped concrete may be used on walks, etc.

The surface cleaning of structure should be undertaken with thegentlest means possible. Sandblasting and strong chemicalcleaning methods that will damage the historic building materialsshould not be used.

MATERIALS

87

ornamentation and trimMATERIALS

Materials that do not compliment those already on the buildingfacade should be avoided. The technique of production andassembly of the typical materials makes a major contribution tothe richness of surface character. Retain original masonry andmortar whenever possible. Existing surfaces shall not becovered with other materials. Where such surface coveringshave been previously installed, building owners are encouragedto remove them and to restore the underlying original surface.

When repairing or replacing deteriorated materials with newmaterials every effort should be made to duplicate the old as

Design Guideline: Existing masonryornamentation and trim of Historic Districtbuildings shall be preserved. On newconstruction, ornamentation should be anintegral part of the design to enhance the visualrichness of buildings in the neighborhood.

Protection of historic architectural characteristics is fundamentalto protecting aesthetic, cultural, and economic value in the Districtand must remain a regulatory priority.

In the past, close-range richness of detail was common andaffordable. Removing architectural features such as cornices,brackets, window architraves, doorway pediments, columns, etc.is not permitted.

Damage to ornamentation or surfaces for sign supports, balconies,mechanical equipment, or other attachments shall not be permitted.

Brick and Terra Cotta

Inappropriate Resurfacing Material

Metal Surfaces with Architectural Intent

Green Wall Stone Veneer

Catching the Sun

Modulation of Light and Shadow

Emphasis at Window Openings Enhancing Arrival

Skyline Lantern

Texture and Scale

Elegant Detailing

Light Reflection

P r e s e r v a t i o n o f N e i g h b o r h o o d Q u a l i t i e s

Page 48: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d88

painting

Design Guideline: The painting of major streetfacades is not recommended. However, it isrecognized that in some instances painting ofthe surface may be advisable.

Side and rear walls of buildings that show scars of removed adjacentstructures or additions can be painted or otherwise treated tominimize this effect. The paint color of side and rear walls shouldblend with the color of the street facade.

Ghost signs and painted advertisements from an earlier era occurinfrequently. They were a part of early twentieth century life andrecord a memory of previous commercial activity and graphic style.All ghost signs should be retained. See page 90.

MATERIALS

89

colorMATERIALS

Many of the existing historic structures in the District have beenpainted. Although this is not ideal it often serves to concealearlier inappropriate or inadequate maintenance or irreversiblechanges that have led to unsightly surface conditions.

Where masonry requires replacement and the original color orsize cannot be matched, painting serves to unify the surfacecolor. Surfaces that are damaged by spalling may requirecleaning and patching that again can be unified by painting.Painting of masonry for purely cosmetic reasons is notrecommended. Masonry structures or parts of buildings thathave been painted for decorative effect should have the paintremoved and returned to their natural color.

Design Guideline: The colors used in the HistoricThird Ward should be traditional muted tonesand should be derived from the existing naturalcolors of the facade materials.

Select colors for trim that contrast with the brick or other adjacentmaterials, for example, dark versus light, but in the same colorrange. To further enhance the architectural qualities of building,the number of colors should be kept to a minimum.

Repainting with colors which cannot be validated throughresearch as being appropriate to the period and style of thehistoric structure is not recommended.

New buildings shall also adopt the design approach ofexpressing the natural color of the stone and masonry materialsused.

Presently, the historic area is characterized by buildings that arepainted or that display the color of the material from which they areconstructed. The predominant brick colors are reddish-brown intone with a lesser number of lighter or cream brick coloration. Someamount of gray stone occurs within the bases of the buildings asdoes glazed terra cotta. In general, these materials should be leftunpainted and cleaned. Details to be painted—window sashes,storefronts, trim, etc. — where possible, should be repainted basedon the original colors discovered by careful removal of outer paintlayers.

Intense colors can detract from a harmonious design, light colorsbring out details, while dark colors obscure them.

Painted Sidewall

Paint Stripping Opportunity Spalled Concrete

Unpainted Alley Wall

Paint Colors Add Detail

Contemporary Color Palette Natural Material Colors Calling Out Ornament

Minimum Color Palette

P r e s e r v a t i o n o f N e i g h b o r h o o d Q u a l i t i e s

Page 49: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d90

ghost signs

Design Guideline: All existing ghost signsshould be retained. New painted masonry wallsignage is prohibited.

Ghost signs, these painted advertisements from an earlierera, occur infrequently. Painted directly on building masonryside walls, they are an authentic remnant of early twentiethcentury life and record a memory of previous commercialactivity and graphic style. All ghost signs should be retainedand allowed to age gracefully in their original form. Ghostsigns shall not be repainted or otherwise improved. Thisguideline shall not preclude building maintenance that mayinvolve masonry restoration.

MATERIALSwall murals and public art

Design Guideline: Wall murals are anencouraged artform.

Wall murals are encouraged as an artform. Because of theirsize and potential impact on the image of the district, thesegraphic illustrations must be of the highest possible aestheticquality. Proposed projects must be submitted to theArchitectural Review Board. They will be reviewed carefullyin terms of concept, technical factors, experience of themuralist, durability, and location on and integration with thearchitecture of the host building. Subject to approval of the ARB,graphic acknowledgment of sponsors/patrons is acceptable.Advertising is unacceptable.

91

We recognoze this sign type under these guidelines is equivalentto an endangered species doomed to extinction. However, giventhe renaissance of the Historic Third Ward as a neighborhood, asopposed to a warehouse district, more suitable modes ofadvertising are in order.

Original Ghost Sign

Punctured But Retain Ghost Sign

Design Guideline: Public art is encouraged.

This neighborhood is identified as the home of the creativeclass. While MIAD, Milwaukee Institute of Art and Design, mostpredominantly represents that community persona, the newneighborhood plan offers increased opportunities for public art.Each installation is subject to ARB approval.

Cornice Sign Now Prohibited

ART

P r e s e r v a t i o n o f N e i g h b o r h o o d Q u a l i t i e s

Page 50: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d92

BIBLIOGRAPHY

93

Further Reading:

Alexander, Christopher, Sara Ishikawa, and Murray Silverstein. A PatternLanguage. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.

Bentley, Ian, Alan Alcock, Paul Murrain, Sue McGlynn, and GrahamSmith. Responsive Environments. New York: Butterworth, 1985.

Broil, Brent C. Architecture in Context. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold,1980

Ching, Francis D.K. Architecture: Form, Space, and Order. New York,:Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1979.

Design Guide For Residential Areas. Colchester, England: CountyCouncil of Essex, December 1973.

Jacobs, Allan B. Great Streets, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1999.

Jacobs, Jane. The Death and Life of American Cities. New York, NY;Random House, 1961.

Katz, Peter. “What Makes a Good Park.” Architecture August 1995: 43-47.

Keeping Up Appearances: Storefront Guidelines. Washington, D.C.:National Trust for Historic Preservation, 1983.

Leccese, Michael. Kathleen McCormick. Charter of the New Urbanism,New York: McGraw-Hill, 1999.

Main Street Guidelines; Awnings and canopies on Main Street.Washington, D.C.: National Trust for Historic Preservation, 1987.

Main Street Guidelines: Signs for Main Street. Washington, D.C.: NationalTrust for Historic Preservation, 1987.

Piwoni, James. Riverwalk Design Guidelines for the Historic ThirdWard District. Milwaukee, WI 1998.

Piwoni, James. Third Ward Neighborhood Planning Guidelines.Milwaukee, WI. 2001.

Further Reading:

Piwoni, James, Karen Mierow and Michael Maierle. Third WardNeighborhood Comprehensive Plan. Milwaukee, WI 2005.

Piwoni, James; Reed, David; Ryhn, Doug. Design Guidelines for theHistoric Third Ward District. Milwaukee, WI 1990.

Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating HistoricBuildings. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior, NationalPark Service, Revised 1983.

Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne; Nagle Hartray & Associates; andMetro- Economics. Historic Third Ward, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; UrbanDesign and Development Potential Study. Milwaukee, WI 1986.

Page 51: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d

APPENDIXriver elements

9594

The HistoricThird Ward Riverwalk is continuously accessible. FutureADA connections to the Riverwalk are anticipated and encouraged. Itis also very important that the design of the connections blend or matchwith all aspects of the design vocabulary established by the initialphases of the HTW Riverwalk design.

Design Principle: The Riverwalk in the Third Ward is anartistic interpretation of the city’s infrastructure and itsrelationship to the Milwaukee River as an environmentalcorridor.

The walk is primarily a wood boardwalk built on heavytimber framing out over the river. Its built close to thewater providing a new and different perspective of theriver. The river’s edge is landscaped with vegetationindigenous to Wisconsin.

The Historic Third Ward Riverwalk is designed to providenew opportunities to experience the Milwaukee River andits relationship to the city and its people. It is an areawhere history as well as the future of the river can beexplored and imagined. The infrastructure of the city, itshighways, bridges, water mains, storm sewers and theirrelationship to the city are featured in the design.

The following material specifications are included to assist inthe design of new connections:

The design of the Riverwalk has both a rich and unique designvocabulary. It is intended that adjacent private property is developedin the future to both enhance and complement the design. The bestcase would be that the adjacent materials match in an exactingmanner.

Materials and Typical Details

Accessible Connections

ADA Ramp

The walking surface of the boardwalk is a very dense, sustainableironwood known as Ipe (Tebebuia Lapacho). The standard deckingprofiles used are 5/4"x6" and 2x8" nominal boards with eased edges.Any new sections of walkway must be 8’-0" clear, minimum. Anyprivate access connectors (ramps, steps, etc.) should be 4’-0" clear,minimum. Decking is to be secured using stainless steel deckingscrews with vandal-resistant heads. Steps and ramp surfaces shouldutilize a “non-slip” routed surface board. No sealer or stains are used,the wood is allowed to naturally transition to a silvery-grey color.

Boardwalk

Walking Surface

The primary structure of the Riverwalk is heavy timber. Thematerial used on this project is Parallam, manufactured byTrusJoist MacMillian. Heavy timber members have been treatedwith Penta oil preservative to provide a long lifespan. All connec-tions between the members are made with stainless steel brackets

Structure

Support Structure

The handrail comprises painted steel vertical supports and top rail,infilled with a stainless steel mesh. The posts are fashioned in aladder-like manner and attached, if possible, directly to the heavytimber structure. Top rail should be 2" in diameter. Where thewalkway curves, the top rail should be curved to match. Thehandrail system is to be painted with a high-performance paintsystem that consists of an inorganic zinc-rich primer, a black topcoat and a semi-gloss clear coat finish. The stainless steel meshinfill panel is the X-Tend product, manufactured by Décor Cable.The mesh is threaded over braided stainless steel cable or roddepending upon the walkway condition.

Handrail

Handrail Detail

Simple substantial ironwood 12"x 12" x 5 foot benches defineresting points along the riverwalk.Benches are typically arranged in groups of three. Benches may besubstituted in lieu of the metal handrail system as an edgetreatment with the approval of the various review agencies.Benches used in this manner should be closely spaced with aseparation of approximately 6".

Benches

Benches

Page 52: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d

APPENDIXriver elements

9796

Several special elements have been designed and located throughout theproject. This includes the spiral overlook at Buffalo Street, severaltransition circles, and the pavilion at Chicago Street. Each of theseelements is constructed of steel framing and aluminum grating. All steel ispainted with the same high performance paint system outlined in theHandrail section.

Special Elements

Spiral Overlook at Buffalo

A carefully selected group of native plants were identified to softenthe riverwalk edge. New planting beds on private property adjacentto the riverwalk should contribute to and be compatible with theoverall aesthetic experience.

· Other types of plant species than those selected forthe project, in permanent planters or in the ground, arediscouraged adjacent to the riverwalk.

· Small-scaled annual plantings in planters to add coloron private property is acceptable.

Plant ListDeciduous Trees

· Ohio Buckeye· Red Maple· Sugar Maple· Autumn Purple White Ash· Quaking Aspen· Basswood

Ornamental Trees· Allegheny Serviceberry· Cockspur Hawthorn

Evergreen Trees· Eastern Red Cedar· Eastern White Pine

Deciduous Shrubs· Running Serviceberry· Hazelnut· Redosier Dogwood· Isanti Redosier Dogwood· Dwarf-bush Honeysuckle· Gro-low Fragrant Sumac· Staghorn Sumac· American Elderberry· Dwarf Artic Willow· Arrowwood Viburmum· Nannyberry Viburmum

Evergreen Shrubs· Bar Harbor Juniper

Perennials· Little Bluestem· Planter Meadow Mix

LandscapingThe lighting strategy has been developed as a combination ofambient, low glare “moon lighting” and accent lighting that highlightsthe walkway structure. In addition hidden light sources are projectedinto the water reflecting indirectly on the dockwall surfaceswherever a gap exists. The overall low glare lighting effect isintended to maximize experience of the cityscape’s reflection on theMilwaukee River creating a magical experience for the visitor.

The “Moonlighting” effect is achieved by mounting flood light fixturesto the river face of the building (or pole where no building isavailable). Fixtures typically are mounted at or near the fifth floorlevel of the building. The source of the lighting is a 50watt, metalhalide lamp. High Pressure Sodium (HPS) lamp sources are notacceptable. Light levels on the walk way should be approximately0.50 (one half) footcandles.

Additional lighting that competes with the Riverwalk lighting (bothMoonlighting and accent lighting) is not acceptable. Proposedbuilding lighting fixtures shall compliment the overall nature of theRiverwalk. This includes fixtures for lighting patios, balconies andother outdoors spaces. Pole (street) lights shall not be used to lightany private property or portion of the Riverwalk. Additional lightingshall be configured to avoid glare by using cut-off shield, louvers orother similar devices. Accent lighting sources should utilize eitherquartz or incandescent lamps.

Night Lighting

LightingThe indigenous landscape defines the edges of the river edge andin some cases defines the edge of the riverwalk itself in the formof raised planters. See landscaping section for additionalinformation on acceptable plant types.

Edge Elements

Edge Condition

The signage on the Riverwalk serves two purposes: informationaland educational. The signage is intended to be minimal so as not todistract from the visitor’s experience.

-The city guidelines for signage should be adhered to,any lit signs that are backlit or provide glare arediscouraged.

Signage

Discreet SignageNote: Text edited from original document prepared by Engberg Anderson Design Partnership.

Page 53: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d

APPENDIXphoto credits

98

Photo Credits

* All photos are by James Piwoni, AIA unless otherwise noted below.

Page 2 Italian Community Center Photo Collection

Page 24 Historic Third Ward Association Photo Collection

Page 30 Jen Fletcher middle, bottom left

Page 30 Jen Fletcher bottom left, middle five

Page 31 Phillip Miller bottom right

Page 34 Phillip Miller bottom left

Page 35 Phillip Kurz left, bottom right

Page 36 Jeremy Whitener

Page 37 Jen Stauber top middle, right

Page 40 Jen Fletcher bottom right

Page 41 Jen Fletcher left

Page 47 Historic Third Ward Association Photo Collection top right

Page 84 Jen Stauber

Page 85 Jen Stauber

Page 86 Jeremy Whitener top middle

Page 93 Department of City Development

99

APPENDIXcity ordinance

Page 54: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d100 101

Page 55: Design Guidelines 2006 final - Milwaukee...Clarke Johnson, ex-officio ... Mike Mooney Beth Nichols, ex-officio Sue Riordan Scott Sampson Don Smiley Sue Strauss Einar Tangen Greg Uhen

D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e H i s t o r i c T h i r d W a r d N e i g h b o r h o o d102 103