Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    1/71

    Design Review Board Agenda

    March 9, 2010AGENDA

    Work Session: 8:30 A.M.Regular Meeting: 9:00 A.M.

    Sandy Springs City Hall, 7840 Roswell Road, 500 BuildingMorgan Falls Office Park, Sandy Springs, GA 30350

    Agenda Item Council

    District

    Assigned

    Staff

    Overlay

    District

    Staffs

    Recommendatio

    Work Session: 8:30 AMRegular Meeting: 9:00 AM

    Adoption of Agenda 03/09/10Approval of 02/09/10Meetings Minutes

    VARIANCE1. DRB10-004

    6400 Roswell Road (SR9)Applicant: Acme American, LLC

    The applicant is seeking approval toreconstruct a 4,000 square footbuilding which was damaged by fire.The building is to remain in the existingfootprint and the existing parking lotand landscaping is to remain thesame.

    3Linda

    AbarayUrban

    OverlayApproval

    SIGN PERMITS ISSUED FROM 02/09/10 to 03/09/10

    Public Comments:Discussion Item: Overlay District Rewrite

    ADJOURNMENT

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    2/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    3/71

    Design Review BoardFebruary 9, 2010

    Meeting Minutes

    Board Members PresentColin Lichtenstein (Chair), Andy Porter (Vice Chair), Marlise LaEric Gregory, and Bernadine Richard

    Board Members Absent Van Westmoreland

    Staff Present Patrice Ruffin, Linda Abaray, Cristina Nelson, Gloria Goins, and

    CALL to Order Colin Lichtenstein called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.

    ADOPTION OF AGENDA

    ACTION: Landeck moved to recommend adoption of the February 9, 2010 Agenda. Richard s

    Approved (5-0), Porter, Landeck, Richard, Gregory and Mobley for; Westmoreland Absent; Lich

    PREVIOUS MINUTES

    ACTION: Mobley moved to recommend approval of the Minutes from the August 25, 2009 meeThe Minutes were approved (5-0), Porter, Landeck, Richard, Gregory and Mobley for; WestmoLichtenstein not voting..

    Building Permit

    1. DRB10-003/V10-0018600 Roswell Road (SR9)Applicant: Henry Signs/ Danny LankfordSUMMARY/STAFF PRESENTATION: The applicant is seeking a primary variance from SectiOrdinance to reduce the required ten (10) foot minimum sign setback from the right-of-way to 1

    .Applicant Presentation:Danny Lankford, 2285 Park Central Blvd., Decatur, GA. 30035(Invitation for public comment in support of and in opposition to the petition)

    Support for the PetitionNone

    Against the PetitionN

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    4/71

    Condition(s): None

    SIGN PERMITS ISSUED FROM 01/26/10 to 02/09/10

    Public Comments: None

    Discussion Item: None

    Meeting Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:05 a.m.

    Approval Signatures

    Date Approved 03/09/2010

    Colin Lichtenstein, Chairman

    Patrice Ruffin, Assistant Director,Planning & Zoning

    Gloria Goins, AdministrativeCoordinator/Transcriber

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    5/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    6/71

    DRB Board Member Attendance2010

    NAME 1/12 1/26 2/9 2/23 3/9 3/23 4/13 4 /27 5/11 5/25 6/8 6 /2 2 7 /1 3 7 /2 7 8 /1 0 8 /24 9 /1 4 9/28 10/12 10/26 11/9 11/23

    E. Gregory

    Post 6

    Term Exp:

    12/1/12 1 0 1 *

    M. Landeck

    Post 7 Term

    Exp: 12/1/13 1 1 1 *

    C. Lichtenstein

    Post 2

    Term Exp:

    12/1/11 1 1 1 *

    M. Mobley

    Post 3

    Term Exp:

    12/1/11 1 1 1 *

    A. Porter

    Post 5

    Term Exp:

    12/1/12 1 1 1 *

    B. Richard

    Post 4

    Term Exp:

    12/1/13 1 1 1 *

    V.

    Westmoreland

    Post 1

    Term Exp:

    12/1/11 1 1 0 *

    0 = Absent 1 = Present

    * No Applications Submitted; No Meeting Held.

    * No Applications Submitted; No Meeting Held.

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    7/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    8/71

    DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING MARCH 9, 201

    Petition N

    Property Location 6400 Roswell Road (SR9)

    Owner David Ben-Moshe

    Applicant Acme American, LLC

    Applicants Request Building Permit

    Findings of Fact:

    The subject site is located at 6400 Roswell Road (SR9). The property is zoned C(Commercial District) conditional under Fulton County zoning case Z66-0058 a

    within the Urban District of the Sandy Springs Overlay District.

    Abutting Property Land Uses/Zoning:

    North: Properties zoned C-1 (Community Business District) under Fulton Ccase Z64-0069 and C-1 (Community Business District) under Fulton CountyZ68-0148.East: Property zoned C-1 (Community Business District) under Fulton Count

    Z57-0031.South: Property zoned C-1 (Community Business District) under Fulton Ccase Z96-0036.West: Properties zoned R-3 (Single Family Dwelling District) and O-IInstitutional District) under Fulton County zoning case Z00-0119.

    Enforcement:On May 1, 2009 the building was inspected by Code Enforcement and Buildin

    officers. The building had a dilapidated dumpster enclosure and roof damagefire. The building was condemned after determining it was un-inhabitable.

    A citation was issued on September 18, 2009 for continuous deterioration of tenclosure and the building. The owner appeared in court on November 19, 2has been reset until March 18, 2010 to allow time for the Design Review Boa

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    9/71

    Request:

    The applicant is seeking approval to reconstruct a 4,000 square foot buildingdamaged by fire. The building is to remain in the existing footprint. Modificastraightening of a wall and removal of interior walls. The proposed building

    consist of red tint brick with white mortar, tan stucco with a matching EIFS trfront will have large tampered windows with a dark ionized tint. The larger wallow more natural light into the building. Shade fins are proposed to be inthe windows to shade the building and reduce heat. The existing parking lot ais to remain the same.

    The Board is asked to take action at this meeting due to the court schedule. Thcomment on the appropriateness of the building permit to meet the intent of

    relative to appearance and function. If the proposed building permit seems appsome modification, the Board should make a recommendation on changes thathe relief proposed into harmony with the intent of the ordinance and with thedevelopment if deemed appropriate.

    Analysis

    The requested Building Permit involves Urban District Overlay requirements

    the building, staff requests the Board address each item under the following sZoning Ordinance:

    12B.5.H. Windows the proposed plan meets this standard.The building permit will not exceed forty (40) percent of the propertys moappraisal (12B.2.A). Therefore, they are not required to install streetscape alongfrontage.

    Staff Recommendation:

    Staff recommends APPROVAL.

    Attachments:Letter of intent Date received February 25, 2010.Site plan- Date received February 25, 2010.Elevation Dated received February 25, 2010.Floor Plans - Dated received February 25, 2010.Landscape Plan - Dated received February 25, 2010.Code Enforcement case

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    10/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    11/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    12/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    13/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    14/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    15/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    16/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    17/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    18/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    19/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    20/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    21/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    22/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    23/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    24/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    25/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    26/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    27/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    28/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    29/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    30/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    31/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    32/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    33/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    34/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    35/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    36/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    37/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    38/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    39/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    40/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    41/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    42/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    43/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    44/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    45/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    46/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    47/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    48/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    49/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    50/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    51/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    52/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    53/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    54/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    55/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    56/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    57/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    58/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    59/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    60/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    61/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    62/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    63/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    64/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    65/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    66/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    67/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    68/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    69/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    70/71

  • 8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010

    71/71