Upload
sandy-springs-georgia
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
1/71
Design Review Board Agenda
March 9, 2010AGENDA
Work Session: 8:30 A.M.Regular Meeting: 9:00 A.M.
Sandy Springs City Hall, 7840 Roswell Road, 500 BuildingMorgan Falls Office Park, Sandy Springs, GA 30350
Agenda Item Council
District
Assigned
Staff
Overlay
District
Staffs
Recommendatio
Work Session: 8:30 AMRegular Meeting: 9:00 AM
Adoption of Agenda 03/09/10Approval of 02/09/10Meetings Minutes
VARIANCE1. DRB10-004
6400 Roswell Road (SR9)Applicant: Acme American, LLC
The applicant is seeking approval toreconstruct a 4,000 square footbuilding which was damaged by fire.The building is to remain in the existingfootprint and the existing parking lotand landscaping is to remain thesame.
3Linda
AbarayUrban
OverlayApproval
SIGN PERMITS ISSUED FROM 02/09/10 to 03/09/10
Public Comments:Discussion Item: Overlay District Rewrite
ADJOURNMENT
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
2/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
3/71
Design Review BoardFebruary 9, 2010
Meeting Minutes
Board Members PresentColin Lichtenstein (Chair), Andy Porter (Vice Chair), Marlise LaEric Gregory, and Bernadine Richard
Board Members Absent Van Westmoreland
Staff Present Patrice Ruffin, Linda Abaray, Cristina Nelson, Gloria Goins, and
CALL to Order Colin Lichtenstein called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
ACTION: Landeck moved to recommend adoption of the February 9, 2010 Agenda. Richard s
Approved (5-0), Porter, Landeck, Richard, Gregory and Mobley for; Westmoreland Absent; Lich
PREVIOUS MINUTES
ACTION: Mobley moved to recommend approval of the Minutes from the August 25, 2009 meeThe Minutes were approved (5-0), Porter, Landeck, Richard, Gregory and Mobley for; WestmoLichtenstein not voting..
Building Permit
1. DRB10-003/V10-0018600 Roswell Road (SR9)Applicant: Henry Signs/ Danny LankfordSUMMARY/STAFF PRESENTATION: The applicant is seeking a primary variance from SectiOrdinance to reduce the required ten (10) foot minimum sign setback from the right-of-way to 1
.Applicant Presentation:Danny Lankford, 2285 Park Central Blvd., Decatur, GA. 30035(Invitation for public comment in support of and in opposition to the petition)
Support for the PetitionNone
Against the PetitionN
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
4/71
Condition(s): None
SIGN PERMITS ISSUED FROM 01/26/10 to 02/09/10
Public Comments: None
Discussion Item: None
Meeting Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:05 a.m.
Approval Signatures
Date Approved 03/09/2010
Colin Lichtenstein, Chairman
Patrice Ruffin, Assistant Director,Planning & Zoning
Gloria Goins, AdministrativeCoordinator/Transcriber
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
5/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
6/71
DRB Board Member Attendance2010
NAME 1/12 1/26 2/9 2/23 3/9 3/23 4/13 4 /27 5/11 5/25 6/8 6 /2 2 7 /1 3 7 /2 7 8 /1 0 8 /24 9 /1 4 9/28 10/12 10/26 11/9 11/23
E. Gregory
Post 6
Term Exp:
12/1/12 1 0 1 *
M. Landeck
Post 7 Term
Exp: 12/1/13 1 1 1 *
C. Lichtenstein
Post 2
Term Exp:
12/1/11 1 1 1 *
M. Mobley
Post 3
Term Exp:
12/1/11 1 1 1 *
A. Porter
Post 5
Term Exp:
12/1/12 1 1 1 *
B. Richard
Post 4
Term Exp:
12/1/13 1 1 1 *
V.
Westmoreland
Post 1
Term Exp:
12/1/11 1 1 0 *
0 = Absent 1 = Present
* No Applications Submitted; No Meeting Held.
* No Applications Submitted; No Meeting Held.
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
7/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
8/71
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING MARCH 9, 201
Petition N
Property Location 6400 Roswell Road (SR9)
Owner David Ben-Moshe
Applicant Acme American, LLC
Applicants Request Building Permit
Findings of Fact:
The subject site is located at 6400 Roswell Road (SR9). The property is zoned C(Commercial District) conditional under Fulton County zoning case Z66-0058 a
within the Urban District of the Sandy Springs Overlay District.
Abutting Property Land Uses/Zoning:
North: Properties zoned C-1 (Community Business District) under Fulton Ccase Z64-0069 and C-1 (Community Business District) under Fulton CountyZ68-0148.East: Property zoned C-1 (Community Business District) under Fulton Count
Z57-0031.South: Property zoned C-1 (Community Business District) under Fulton Ccase Z96-0036.West: Properties zoned R-3 (Single Family Dwelling District) and O-IInstitutional District) under Fulton County zoning case Z00-0119.
Enforcement:On May 1, 2009 the building was inspected by Code Enforcement and Buildin
officers. The building had a dilapidated dumpster enclosure and roof damagefire. The building was condemned after determining it was un-inhabitable.
A citation was issued on September 18, 2009 for continuous deterioration of tenclosure and the building. The owner appeared in court on November 19, 2has been reset until March 18, 2010 to allow time for the Design Review Boa
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
9/71
Request:
The applicant is seeking approval to reconstruct a 4,000 square foot buildingdamaged by fire. The building is to remain in the existing footprint. Modificastraightening of a wall and removal of interior walls. The proposed building
consist of red tint brick with white mortar, tan stucco with a matching EIFS trfront will have large tampered windows with a dark ionized tint. The larger wallow more natural light into the building. Shade fins are proposed to be inthe windows to shade the building and reduce heat. The existing parking lot ais to remain the same.
The Board is asked to take action at this meeting due to the court schedule. Thcomment on the appropriateness of the building permit to meet the intent of
relative to appearance and function. If the proposed building permit seems appsome modification, the Board should make a recommendation on changes thathe relief proposed into harmony with the intent of the ordinance and with thedevelopment if deemed appropriate.
Analysis
The requested Building Permit involves Urban District Overlay requirements
the building, staff requests the Board address each item under the following sZoning Ordinance:
12B.5.H. Windows the proposed plan meets this standard.The building permit will not exceed forty (40) percent of the propertys moappraisal (12B.2.A). Therefore, they are not required to install streetscape alongfrontage.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends APPROVAL.
Attachments:Letter of intent Date received February 25, 2010.Site plan- Date received February 25, 2010.Elevation Dated received February 25, 2010.Floor Plans - Dated received February 25, 2010.Landscape Plan - Dated received February 25, 2010.Code Enforcement case
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
10/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
11/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
12/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
13/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
14/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
15/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
16/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
17/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
18/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
19/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
20/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
21/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
22/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
23/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
24/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
25/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
26/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
27/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
28/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
29/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
30/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
31/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
32/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
33/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
34/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
35/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
36/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
37/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
38/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
39/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
40/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
41/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
42/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
43/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
44/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
45/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
46/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
47/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
48/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
49/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
50/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
51/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
52/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
53/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
54/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
55/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
56/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
57/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
58/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
59/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
60/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
61/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
62/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
63/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
64/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
65/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
66/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
67/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
68/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
69/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
70/71
8/14/2019 Design Review Board - 03.09.2010
71/71