27
Research Department + 7 (495) 7855336 www.bcs.ru Timur Salikhov, CFA +7 (495) 785 5336 (4631) [email protected] Desk Note Wednesday, October 9, 2013 Russian Oil & Gas Trade ideas for all types of investors Share price upside summary * Since the trough in June Source: FactSet, BCS The discount reflects sliding returns and high regulatory risks Source: FactSet, BCS Returns are sliding and regulatory risks remain high, but trade ideas still exist. In this report, we highlight our preferred dividend and positive catalyst plays, warn of the riskiest and misperceived stocks and offer shortand longterm pair trade advice. Longterm (upstream with greenfields) – Gazprom Neft, Lukoil and Rosneft Catalysts – Novatek (Yamal LNG), Lukoil (W. Qurna2) and Gazprom (dividends) Dividends – Bashneft (812%), Gazprom (rising to 9%) and Lukoil (>15% pa growth) Stocks to avoid – Transneft (pref), Alliance Oil and Tatneft Gazprom Neft, Lukoil and Rosneft – safest LT exposure. Industry regulatory risks remain high as the government seeks additional sources of tax revenues to prevent budget deficit growth. The recent oil tax reshuffle alone will result in over $2.5bn pa of additional payments. Tax hikes in the future are highly likely, especially in the profitable refining and gas sectors. Upstream companies with significant greenfield exposure are the safest play on the sector: Gazprom Neft, Lukoil and Rosneft. Novatek, Lukoil and Gazprom – momentum plays. Global energy investors have kept Novatek on their radar, anticipating it to derisk on the back of liberalization of LNG exports, new partners for Yamal and FID. Lukoil offers the best exposure to oil price stabilization, while the launch of West Qurna2 in November should crystalize over 10% of the company’s value. Gazprom is yet to price in the 35% dividend payout requirement, most of the bad news is behind it, and a continued rise in gas sales to Europe and a gas pricing agreement with China could further improve sentiment towards the stock. Bashneft, Gazprom and Lukoil – dividend yielders. Russian O&G companies have nearly trebled dividend payments since 2008. Bashneft’s and SurgutNG pref’s doubledigit dividend yields are among the highest globally. Lukoil’s past and future dividend growth (20% pa) is far ahead of its peers. Gazprom minorities are the primary beneficiaries of the dividend payout increase, unlike holders of Transneft prefs, who have no guarantee that the benefits of a larger dividend pool will all go to common shareholders. Bashneft upgraded to Buy. Due to underperformance following the recent rally (3% vs sector’s 29%) and a generous yearend dividend (8% common, 12% preferred) we have upgraded Bashneft to Buy. The investment story is clean – Bashneft is growing production (4% CAGR 201316e) unlike most of its peers, its CapEx cycle is fairly light, and therefore the 10% FCF yield is above the sector average of 6%. A potential London IPO next year would improve liquidity, attract new investors and finance resource base growth and asset acquisitions. Lukoil, Gazprom Neft and Novatek – still top picks; Bashneft – upgraded to Buy Company Rating Current Target price Upside Dividend P/E EV/EBITDA price New Old yield ‘13 ‘14e ‘15e ‘14e ‘15e Lukoil BUY $64.00 $75.00 $75.00 17% 5.1% 4.5x 4.9x 2.5x 2.6x Gazprom Neft BUY $22.32 $25.00 $25.00 12% 5.7% 4.3x 5.0x 3.0x 3.3x Bashneft BUY Rb1,887.60 Rb2,100.00 Rb2,100.00 11% 8.0% 6.5x 6.8x 4.9x 5.1x Novatek BUY $135.00 $145.00 $145.00 7% 2.1% 13.8x 12.5x 10.5x 9.3x Rosneft HOLD $8.08 $8.30 $8.30 3% 3.2% 6.6x 7.2x 4.9x 4.8x Surgutneftegas (pref) HOLD Rb23.50 Rb24.00 Rb23.50 2% 9.2% 5.7x 6.0x 0.7x 0.7x Gazprom HOLD $9.08 $9.00 $8.50 1% 4.7% 3.4x 3.7x 3.0x 3.0x Surgutneftegas SELL $8.61 $8.50 $8.30 1% 2.1% 5.7x 6.0x 0.7x 0.7x Tatneft SELL $38.99 $40.00 $39.00 3% 4.0% 6.4x 6.6x 4.6x 4.7x Transneft (pref) SELL Rb83,786.00 Rb75,000.00 Rb75,000.00 10% 0.8% 3.0x 2.8x 3.0x 2.9x Alliance Oil SELL SEK 52.95 SEK 41.00 SEK 41.00 23% 4.0x 3.1x 4.4x 3.9x As of 7 October 2013 Source: FactSet, BCS 23% 10% 1% 1% 2% 3% 3% 7% 11% 12% 17% 30% 10% 10% 30% 50% 30% 10% 10% 30% 50% AOIL TRNFP SGGD OGZD SNGSP ATAD ROSN NVTK BANE GAZ LKOD Past performance* Upside 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Oct08 Jan10 Apr11 Jul 12 Oct13 P/E Russian oils Global majors 40% discount

Desk Note Wednesday, Russian Oil Gas - Gazprom Neftir.gazprom-neft.com/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/BCS_Trade_i… · Long Lukoil / Short Rosneft ‐ A play on oil price stabilization

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

 Research Department + 7 (495) 785‐53‐36  www.bcs.ru

Timur Salikhov, CFA+7 (495) 785 5336 (4631) 

[email protected]

Desk Note  

Wednesday, October 9, 2013 

  Russian Oil & Gas 

  Trade ideas for all types of investors 

Share price upside summary 

* Since the trough in June Source: FactSet, BCS  

The discount reflects sliding returns and high regulatory risks

Source: FactSet, BCS 

 

Returns are sliding and regulatory risks remain high, but trade ideas still exist. In this report, we highlight our preferred dividend and positive catalyst plays, warn of  the riskiest and misperceived stocks and offer short‐ and long‐term pair trade advice. 

Long‐term (upstream with greenfields) – Gazprom Neft, Lukoil and Rosneft 

Catalysts – Novatek (Yamal LNG), Lukoil (W. Qurna‐2) and Gazprom (dividends) 

Dividends – Bashneft (8‐12%), Gazprom (rising to 9%) and Lukoil (>15% pa growth)

Stocks to avoid – Transneft (pref), Alliance Oil and Tatneft 

Gazprom  Neft,  Lukoil  and  Rosneft  –  safest  LT  exposure.  Industry  regulatory  risks remain  high  as  the  government  seeks  additional  sources  of  tax  revenues  to  prevent budget deficit growth. The recent oil tax reshuffle alone will result in over $2.5bn pa of additional payments. Tax hikes in the future are highly likely, especially in the profitable refining and gas sectors. Upstream companies with significant greenfield exposure are the safest play on the sector: Gazprom Neft, Lukoil and Rosneft. 

Novatek,  Lukoil  and Gazprom  – momentum  plays. Global  energy  investors  have  kept Novatek  on  their  radar,  anticipating  it  to  de‐risk  on  the  back  of  liberalization  of  LNG exports,  new  partners  for  Yamal  and  FID.  Lukoil  offers  the  best  exposure  to  oil  price stabilization, while the launch of West Qurna‐2 in November should crystalize over 10% of the company’s value. Gazprom  is yet  to price  in  the 35% dividend payout  requirement, most of the bad news  is behind  it, and a continued rise  in gas sales to Europe and a gas pricing agreement with China could further improve sentiment towards the stock. 

Bashneft, Gazprom and Lukoil – dividend yielders. Russian O&G companies have nearly trebled  dividend  payments  since  2008.  Bashneft’s  and  SurgutNG  pref’s  double‐digit dividend yields are among the highest globally. Lukoil’s past and future dividend growth (20% pa) is far ahead of its peers. Gazprom minorities are the primary beneficiaries of the dividend payout increase, unlike holders of Transneft prefs, who have no guarantee that the benefits of a larger dividend pool will all go to common shareholders. 

Bashneft upgraded to Buy. Due to underperformance following the recent rally (3% vs sector’s 29%) and a generous year‐end dividend (8% common, 12% preferred) we have upgraded  Bashneft  to  Buy.  The  investment  story  is  clean  –  Bashneft  is  growing production (4% CAGR 2013‐16e) unlike most of  its peers,  its CapEx cycle  is  fairly  light,and therefore the 10% FCF yield is above the sector average of 6%. A potential London IPO next year would improve liquidity, attract new investors and finance resource base growth and asset acquisitions. 

 

Lukoil, Gazprom Neft and Novatek – still top picks; Bashneft – upgraded to Buy Company  Rating  Current  Target price Upside Dividend  P/E  EV/EBITDA      price  New Old yield ‘13  ‘14e  ‘15e  ‘14e ‘15e

Lukoil  BUY  $64.00  $75.00 $75.00 17% 5.1%  4.5x  4.9x  2.5x 2.6x

Gazprom Neft  BUY  $22.32  $25.00 $25.00 12% 5.7%  4.3x  5.0x  3.0x 3.3x

Bashneft  BUY  Rb1,887.60  Rb2,100.00 Rb2,100.00 11% 8.0%  6.5x  6.8x  4.9x 5.1x

Novatek  BUY  $135.00  $145.00 $145.00 7% 2.1%  13.8x  12.5x  10.5x 9.3x

Rosneft  HOLD  $8.08  $8.30 $8.30 3% 3.2%  6.6x  7.2x  4.9x 4.8x

Surgutneftegas (pref)  HOLD  Rb23.50  Rb24.00 Rb23.50 2% 9.2%  5.7x  6.0x  0.7x 0.7x

Gazprom  HOLD  $9.08  $9.00 $8.50 ‐1% 4.7%  3.4x  3.7x  3.0x 3.0x

Surgutneftegas  SELL  $8.61  $8.50 $8.30 ‐1% 2.1%  5.7x  6.0x  0.7x 0.7x

Tatneft  SELL  $38.99  $40.00 $39.00 3% 4.0%  6.4x  6.6x  4.6x 4.7x

Transneft (pref)  SELL  Rb83,786.00  Rb75,000.00 Rb75,000.00 ‐10% 0.8%  3.0x  2.8x  3.0x 2.9x

Alliance Oil  SELL  SEK 52.95  SEK 41.00 SEK 41.00 ‐23% ‐  4.0x  3.1x  4.4x 3.9x

As of 7 October 2013    Source: FactSet, BCS

‐23%

‐10%

‐1%

‐1%

2%

3%

3%

7%

11%

12%

17%

‐30% ‐10% 10% 30% 50%

‐30% ‐10% 10% 30% 50%

AOIL

TRNFP

SGGD

OGZD

SNGSP

ATAD

ROSN

NVTK

BANE

GAZ

LKOD

Past performance* Upside

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Oct‐08 Jan‐10 Apr‐11 Jul‐12 Oct‐13

P/E

Russian oils Global majors

40% discount

Russian Oil & Gas 

2

Investment case 

Looking  for  trade  ideas  after  the  strong  rally: We  remain  cautious  on  the  sector’s returns, highlight strong regulatory risks and therefore see limited upside in share prices (4%, on average) despite attractive valuations on a global scale (40% discount). For this reason, we  focus on  trade  ideas  for different  investor  types with different  investment horizons. We highlight our preferred dividend and catalyst plays, warn of the riskiest and misperceived stocks and offer short‐ and long‐term pair trade advice.  

Top ‘3s’  Dividend plays     

Stock  Yield ‘13  Reason  Comments Bashneft  8‐12%  Robust yield just days away  Sustainably high dividend yield backed by FCF, despite heavy CapEx 

cycle (10%, on average, during 2013‐16) 

Gazprom  5%  Switch to 35% IFRS payout  The stock is primarily driven by consensus dividend expectations, which are currently reflecting a 25% IFRS payout 

Lukoil  5%  Beating consensus expectations  Management beat its 15% pa dividend growth guidance in 2010‐12, but the Street remains conservative with respect to future growth 

     Catalyst plays     

Stock  Catalyst  Comments Novatek  Liberalization of LNG exports  Allows export of LNG directly to customers 

  New partner(s) for Yamal LNG  Partners’ commitment will further de‐risk the project 

  FID on Yamal LNG  Adds credibility to the project in the eyes of investors 

  Domestic gas sales increase  High chance to beat FY13 target as Gazprom is directing more volumes toEurope 

Lukoil  Test launch of West Qurna‐2  De‐risking consensus 2014 FCF forecasts 

  Oil price stabilization  Least sensitive to the oil price decline 

  3Q13 US GAAP results  Upside risk to consensus 2013 FCF forecasts 

Gazprom  Strong momentum in Europe  Rising volumes and spot prices are driving earnings 

  Deal with China  Guaranteed profitable gas supplies (save for a costly pipeline)

  Dividend talks  Consensus’ DPS expectations are major share price drivers 

     Long‐term trades1     

Trade  Reason  Risks Long Lukoil / Short Rosneft 

Shareholder returns mismatch and commitment to shareholder value 

‐ Lukoil abandons the 15% pa dividend growth target  ‐ Rosneft: value‐accretive resource base growth and asset acquisition 

Long Novatek / Short Gazprom 

Novatek management’s track‐record vs Gazprom’s lack of CapEx discipline 

‐ Novatek: execution issues with Yamal LNG and decelerating growth 

‐ Gazprom fights to preserve its domestic market share, optimizes costs and executes strict control over CapEx  

Long Gazprom /         Short Transneft (pref) 

Playing the state companies’ dividend policy change (switch to 35% IFRS) 

‐ Gazprom pushes back the dividend policy change and hikes CapEx 

‐ Transneft guides for similar dividends for both classes of shares 

     Short‐term trades2     

Trade  Reason  Risks Long Lukoil / Short Rosneft 

A play on oil price stabilization and Lukoil’s West Qurna‐2 launch 

‐ Lukoil: West Qurna‐2 launch delay, issues with cost recovery 

‐ Rosneft: value‐accretive asset acquisition / resource base expansion 

Long Gazprom Neft / Short SurgutNG 

Valuation mismatch (4.3x P/E vs 5.7x) and a play on changes in greenfield regulation  

‐ Gazprom Neft delays the development of greenfields, receives oil assets from Gazprom and reimburses the latter for historical costs 

‐ SurgutNG: focus switch towards growth and resource base expansion 

Long Alliance Oil (pref) / Short Alliance Oil 

Guaranteed income vs execution risk and elevated valuation 

‐ Uplift in refining margins sooner than expected; output growth above expectations at a reasonable cost 

     Stocks to avoid     

Stock  Reason  Comments Transneft (pref)  No guarantee to benefit from the switch to 

a 35% dividend payout Increase in total dividend pool could all go to common shares, as charter does not stipulate that the dividend paid on preferred shares (10% RAS net income) must equal that paid on commons  

Alliance Oil  Expensive valuation does not justify fundamentals 

Refinery upgrade delay, risk of consensus forecast downgrade, high M&A and execution risk 

Tatneft  Falling EPS; low shareholder returns; expensive 

The second stage of Taneco will prevent value‐accretive use of FCF and will cap shareholder returns and growth 

    1. 1‐2 years, 2. 3‐6monthsSource: BCS

Russian Oil & Gas 

3

Valuation 

Trading at a discount, for good cause: Russian Oil & Gas stocks lagged their global peers as the latter re‐rated in the past year. As a result, the discount has widened to 40% from the five‐year average of 32%. Despite relatively attractive valuation, Russian stocks are unlikely  to  catch up with  their global peers any  time  soon, given  rapidly  rising CapEx, sliding  returns  and  – most  critically  –  high  regulatory  risks, which  are  global  energy investors’ major concern about  investing  in Russia, as we  found out during our  recent two‐week marketing trip in Europe. 

Discount reflects high regulatory risks, sliding investment returns Most stocks trade close to 52W highs post recent oil price rally

Source: FactSet

 

Russian oil & gas companies are trading at a substantial discount to global peers 

Company name  Trading  Share  MCap,  EV,  P/E  EV/EBITDA currency  price  $mn  $mn  ‘13e  ‘14e  ‘15e  ‘13e  ‘14e  ‘15e 

Russian Oil & Gas       Gazprom  USD  9.08 104,182 149,278 3.1 3.4  3.7  2.8 3.0 3.0Rosneft  USD  8.08 85,632 145,890 6.6 6.6  7.2  5.2 4.9 4.8Lukoil  USD  64.00 48,311 55,077 4.6 4.5  4.9  3.0 2.5 2.6Novatek  USD  135.00 40,948 44,500 15.5 13.8  12.5  11.5 10.5 9.3Surgutneftegas  USD  8.61 30,760 5,622 4.6 5.7  6.0  0.7 0.7 0.7Gazprom Neft  USD  22.32 21,061 27,129 4.3 4.3  5.0  3.1 3.0 3.3Tatneft  USD  38.99 13,775 16,128 6.5 6.4  6.6  4.6 4.6 4.7Bashneft  RUB  1,887.60 11,045 14,839 6.4 6.5  6.8  4.9 4.9 5.1Alliance Oil  SEK  52.95 1,414 3,804 6.7 4.0  3.1  5.5 4.4 3.9Russian Oil & Gas weighted average 6.0 6.0  6.2  4.6 4.4 4.3Russian Oil weighted average  5.6 5.7  6.2  4.5 4.2 4.2

Super Majors     ExxonMobil  USD  85.90 378,100 398,386 11.3 11.0  11.0  5.0 4.8 4.7Chevron  USD  117.87 227,728 226,719 9.8 9.8  9.7  4.2 4.0 3.9Royal Dutch Shell  GBp  21.09 215,867 237,652 9.2 8.5  8.4  4.0 3.9 3.8BP  GBp  4.39 133,543 149,902 9.2 8.1  7.7  3.8 3.7 3.6Total  EUR  42.99 132,344 161,276 8.6 8.1  7.7  3.7 3.4 3.3Super Majors weighted average  10.0 9.5  9.4  4.3 4.1 4.0

Integrateds Eni  EUR  17.14 84,272 108,437 12.3 9.9  9.0  3.3 2.9 2.7ConocoPhillips  USD  70.88 86,687 104,848 11.5 11.3  11.1  4.6 4.4 4.3Statoil  NOK  134.50 71,652 84,540 10.1 8.4  8.4  2.2 2.1 2.0BG Group  GBp  11.69 63,986 75,534 15.5 13.7  10.9  7.2 6.3 5.1Repsol  EUR  18.23 32,215 58,723 11.0 10.5  10.2  6.0 6.0 5.7Marathon Oil  USD  34.72 24,640 30,890 12.2 11.2  12.0  3.1 3.0 3.2Galp  EUR  12.40 13,955 20,396 N/M N/M  N/M  12.8 10.7 8.8Murphy Oil  USD  61.84 11,557 13,517 9.9 9.6  11.0  3.6 3.2 3.4Integrateds weighted average  12.1 11.3  10.8  4.8 4.4 4.1

EM Oils       PetroChina  HKD  8.55 201,798 287,568 9.6 9.0  8.3  4.7 4.4 4.1CNOOC  HKD  15.84 91,201 95,905 8.8 8.5  8.2  4.3 4.0 3.7Petrobras  USD  15.67 58,312 137,648 4.8 4.4  3.6  4.4 4.0 3.5ONGC  INR  265.95 36,791 37,340 8.6 7.0  6.9  3.9 3.3 3.3Reliance Industries  INR  843.85 44,064 49,195 12.0 10.6  9.3  8.7 7.5 6.3Sasol  ZAc  485.99 32,574 33,268 11.3 10.5  11.0  6.1 5.7 5.8Sinopec  USD  79.97 20,403 76,536 1.8 1.6  1.6  2.6 2.3 2.1Indian Oil Corp  INR  212.05 8,325 22,304 9.3 7.3  6.4  8.4 7.3 6.6EM Oils weighted average  8.8 8.1  7.6  4.8 4.3 4.0

As of 7 October 2013   Source: FactSet, BCS 

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Oct‐08 Oct‐09 Oct‐10 Oct‐11 Oct‐12 Oct‐13

P/E Russian oils Global majors

40% discount

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Novatek

Bashne

ft

Tatneft

SurgutNG

Rosneft

Lukoil

Gazprom

Neft

Alliance

 Oil

Gazprom

Tran

sneft

(pref)

P/E 52‐week high

52‐week  low

Current

Russian Oil & Gas 

4

Key changes 

Upgrading Bashneft to Buy due to the following reasons: 

o The stock’s underperformance following the oil price rally (3% vs sector’s 29%); 

o generous  dividends  in  the  coming  months  (8%  yield  for  common,  12%  for preferred); 

o the  company’s  clean  investment  story  (group  structure  optimization,  rising production and solid FCF). 

Raising  TPs by  2‐6%  reflecting  the  upward  shift  in  the Brent  forward  curve.  The positive effect was partially offset by the freeze on 2014 gas tariffs and the crude oil tax reshuffle. 

    

Revising estimates 

We revised our financial forecasts to reflect 2Q13 financial results, the oil price increase and  the  government’s  decision  to  freeze  gas  tariffs  next  year  and  reshuffle  crude  oil taxes (increase MET and reduce export duty). 

Oil price increase: We mark to market the Brent forward curve to reflect the shift in 

consensus oil price expectations (2013: $109 from $104; 2014: $105 from $99). We 

adjust 2014 refining crack spreads accordingly. 

o Key beneficiaries:  i)  Surgutneftegas and Tatneft, due  to  the  largest upstream exposure; ii) Rosneft, due to high leverage. 

Gas tariff freeze: Downside to our numbers  is insignificant (4% for Novatek, 3% for 

Gazprom), because we originally expected a maximum 5% pa  increase  in the tariff 

vs the government’s target of 15% pa growth. 

o The action is in line with our view that the gas sector’s high investment returns are associated with significant regulatory risks, be  it the top  line (tariff) or the bottom line (taxes). 

o Novatek is more sensitive to changes in domestic gas tariffs than Gazprom, due to a higher share of domestic sales and Gazprom’s low margins on domestic gas sales. 

Crude oil tax reshuffle: 

o Government: c$2.5bn pa of additional tax revenues by 2015‐16. 

o Key beneficiaries:  i) Novatek – unaffected by  the oil MET hike; benefits  from lower  export  duties  on  crude/condensate  and  products,  ii)  Tatneft  and Surgutneftegas –  significant  share of depleted  fields absorbs a quarter of  the MET  increase; benefits of  lower crude export duty offset higher cost of  third‐party crude purchases. 

o Key  losers: Bashneft and Alliance Oil – higher cost of third‐party crude offsets lower product export duties.  

Recently proposed oil & gas tax changes   2013 2014  2015 2016

Oil MET base rate (Rb/mcm)         

Old  470  470  470  470 

New  470  493  530  559 

Change  ‐  5%  13%  19% 

Oil export duty         

Old  60%  60%  60%  60% 

New  60%  59%  57%  55% 

Change  ‐  ‐1pp  ‐3pp  ‐5pp 

Gas tariff growth         

Old  15%  15%  15%  N/A 

New  15%  0%  5%* 5%*

Change  ‐  ‐15pp  ‐10pp  N/A 

* BCS real inflation rate expectationSource: Ministry of Finance, Federal Tariff Service, BCS

Russian Oil & Gas 

5

 Summary of macro and regulatory changes on financial forecasts 

 EBITDA 

2014 Oil price increase 

Gas tariff freeze 

Oil tax maneuver  Total

EBITDA 2015

Oil price increase

Gas tariff freeze

Oil tax maneuver Total 

EBITDA 2016 

Gas tariff freeze

Oil tax maneuver Total

Surgutneftegas  8,040  4.3%  ‐0.2%  ‐0.2%  3.9% 8,273 1.5% ‐0.4% 1.0% 2.1%  8,782  ‐0.4% 3.7% 3.3%

Tatneft  3,506  4.2%  0.0%  ‐1.6%  2.6% 3,010 1.6% ‐0.1% ‐2.9% ‐1.4%  3,541  ‐0.1% ‐1.9% ‐2.0%

Rosneft  27,680  4.1%  ‐0.2%  ‐1.6%  2.3% 24,528 1.7% ‐0.4% ‐2.8% ‐1.5%  28,398  ‐0.5% ‐1.5% ‐2.0%

Lukoil  23,387  2.0%  0.0%  ‐1.0%  1.0% 22,231 0.9% ‐0.1% ‐1.5% ‐0.7%  22,359  ‐0.1% ‐0.9% ‐1.0%

Gazprom Neft  8,831  2.4%  ‐0.2%  ‐1.4%  0.8% 8,039 1.3% ‐0.4% ‐2.8% ‐1.9%  8,776  ‐0.4% ‐1.1% ‐1.5%

Novatek  4,531  2.1%  ‐1.7%  0.4%  0.8% 4,286 0.8% ‐3.8% 1.4% ‐1.5%  4,465  ‐3.8% 2.8% ‐1.0%

Alliance Oil  840  1.3%  ‐0.1%  ‐0.6%  0.6% 945 0.9% ‐0.2% ‐0.5% 0.2%  845  ‐0.2% ‐1.3% ‐1.5%

Bashneft  3,061  1.2%  0.0%  ‐1.0%  0.2% 2,818 1.1% 0.0% ‐1.5% ‐0.4%  2,781  0.0% ‐0.5% ‐0.5%

Gazprom  52,156  0.8%  ‐1.3%  ‐0.1%  ‐0.6% 49,521 0.3% ‐2.9% 0.0% ‐2.5%  50,157  ‐2.9% 0.5% ‐2.3%

Source: BCS

 Our new financial forecasts reflect the upward shift in the oil price expectations and the proposed changes in taxation 

    Revenue EBITDA   Net income

$mn    2013e 2014e 2015e 2013e 2014e 2015e    2013e  2014e 2015eGazprom  Old 149,970 149,655 149,932 52,028 49,564 48,637     30,603  29,229 27,426   New  154,655 152,410 150,232 56,001 52,156 49,521     32,952  31,187 27,828   Difference  3% 2% 0% 8% 5% 2%     8%  7% 1%

Rosneft  Old 139,233 150,737 144,668 26,503 30,994 26,214     10,328  13,235 8,772   New  140,815 148,616 144,668 26,964 27,680 24,528     10,988  10,290 6,949   Difference  1% ‐1% 0% 2% ‐11% ‐6%     6%  ‐22% ‐21%

Lukoil  Old 143,007 146,221 138,178 19,353 24,623 21,966     10,259  9,726 8,627   New  140,947 143,055 139,885 18,698 23,387 22,231     9,870  8,873 8,663   Difference  ‐1% ‐2% 1% ‐3% ‐5% 1%     ‐4%  ‐9% 0%

Novatek  Old 9,896 10,891 11,727 4,132 4,223 4,224     2,864  3,095 3,087   New  9,612 11,091 11,782 4,042 4,531 4,286     2,834  3,380 3,222   Difference  ‐3% 2% 0% ‐2% 7% 1%     ‐1%  9% 4%

Surgutneftegas  Old 39,294 38,591 36,412 7,972 8,774 7,476     7,878  6,852 5,572   New  40,597 38,900 36,589 8,034 8,040 7,002     8,169  6,262 5,143   Difference  3% 1% 0% 1% ‐8% ‐6%     4%  ‐9% ‐8%

Gazprom neft  Old 44,005 43,683 42,430 8,786 9,810 8,133     4,877  5,581 4,324   New  44,565 43,628 42,686 8,583 8,831 8,039     4,736  4,818 4,219   Difference  1% 0% 1% ‐2% ‐10% ‐1%     ‐3%  ‐14% ‐2%

Tatneft  Old 13,724 13,642 12,813 3,666 3,715 3,182     2,200  2,340 1,925   New  13,914 13,965 13,382 3,555 3,506 3,010     2,148  2,146 1,721   Difference  1% 2% 4% ‐3% ‐6% ‐5%     ‐2%  ‐8% ‐11%

Bashneft  Old 16,297 16,159 15,659 3,103 3,271 2,942     1,794  1,955 1,759   New  17,120 16,574 16,160 3,030 3,061 2,818     1,753  1,716 1,639   Difference  5% 3% 3% ‐2% ‐6% ‐4%     ‐2%  ‐12% ‐7%

Alliance Oil  Old 3,424 3,797 3,615 588 998 922     146  475 428   New  3,627 3,716 3,749 671 840 945     182  321 410   Difference  6% ‐2% 4% 14% ‐16% 2%     25%  ‐32% ‐4%

Transneft  Old 23,644 24,046 24,675 10,965 11,256 11,754     5,152  5,651 6,071  New  23,886 23,741 24,280 11,177 10,896 11,387     5,526  5,477 5,880  Difference  1% ‐1% ‐2% 2% ‐3% ‐3%     7%  ‐3% ‐3%

Source: BCS

    

Russian Oil & Gas 

6

BCS vs consensus estimates 

Our financial forecasts are generally below consensus due to more conservative oil price assumptions*     Revenue EBITDA   Net income

$mn    2013e 2014e 2015e 2013e 2014e 2015e    2013e  2014e 2015eGazprom  Consensus  155,362 154,804 157,085 53,333 50,299 49,098     33,272  30,478 28,091   BCS  154,655 152,410 150,232 56,001 52,156 49,521     32,952  31,187 27,828   Difference  0% ‐2% ‐4% 5% 4% 1%     ‐1%  2% ‐1%

Rosneft  Consensus  143,681 151,389 150,696 28,070 29,988 30,320     12,908  12,957 11,907   BCS  140,815 148,616 144,668 26,964 27,680 24,528     10,988  10,290 6,949   Difference  ‐2% ‐2% ‐4% ‐4% ‐8% ‐19%     ‐15%  ‐21% ‐42%

Lukoil  Consensus  134,836 134,972 133,683 18,660 21,737 21,004     10,526  10,809 9,817   BCS  140,947 143,055 139,885 18,698 23,387 22,231     9,870  8,873 8,663   Difference  5% 6% 5% 0% 8% 6%     ‐6%  ‐18% ‐12%

Novatek  Consensus  9,240 10,851 11,839 3,868 4,258 4,787     2,646  2,969 3,276   BCS  9,612 11,091 11,782 4,042 4,531 4,286     2,834  3,380 3,222   Difference  4% 2% 0% 4% 6% ‐10%     7%  14% ‐2%

Surgutneftegas  Consensus  31,836 30,703 31,020 8,589 8,098 7,587     6,634  5,359 5,117   BCS  40,597 38,900 36,589 8,034 8,040 7,002     8,169  6,262 5,143   Difference  28% 27% 18% ‐6% ‐1% ‐8%     23%  17% 1%

Gazprom neft  Consensus  45,802 45,450 45,179 8,749 8,906 8,284     4,940  4,911 4,234   BCS  44,565 43,628 42,686 8,583 8,831 8,039     4,736  4,818 4,219   Difference  ‐3% ‐4% ‐6% ‐2% ‐1% ‐3%     ‐4%  ‐2% 0%

Tatneft  Consensus  18,207 17,481 17,741 3,519 3,530 3,431     2,133  2,155 2,091   BCS  13,914 13,965 13,382 3,555 3,506 3,010     2,148  2,146 1,721   Difference  ‐24% ‐20% ‐25% 1% ‐1% ‐12%     1%  0% ‐18%

Bashneft  Consensus  17,022 16,764 16,479 3,042 3,035 2,925     1,728  1,700 1,631   BCS  17,120 16,574 16,160 3,030 3,061 2,818     1,753  1,716 1,639   Difference  1% ‐1% ‐2% 0% 1% ‐4%     1%  1% 0%

Alliance Oil  Consensus  3,630 3,859 3,905 693 872 988     212  356 452   BCS  3,627 3,716 3,749 671 840 945     182  321 410   Difference  0% ‐4% ‐4% ‐3% ‐4% ‐4%     ‐14%  ‐10% ‐9%

Transneft  Consensus  22,740 23,058 23,423 11,333 11,577 11,510     5,642  5,848 5,737  BCS  23,886 23,741 24,280 11,177 10,896 11,387     5,526  5,477 5,880  Difference  5% 3% 4% ‐1% ‐6% ‐1%     ‐2%  ‐6% 2%

* $108/bbl in 2013, $103/bbl in 2014, and $97/bbl in 2015Source: FactSet, BCS

 

   

Russian Oil & Gas 

7

Recommendation summary1 

Buy   

Lukoil (TP $75/GDR) – Highest shareholder returns in the sector 

Robust dividend growth (15% pa) translates into highest returns among peers 

Diversified asset growth portfolio (Uzbek gas,  Iraqi PSA, tax‐exempt Caspian fields) implying gradual production and earnings increase 

Consensus  has  yet  to  re‐assess  the  FCF  outlook  taking  into  account  CapEx optimization and West Qurna‐2 immediate cost recovery 

West Siberian production  starting  to  show positive  signs; contribution of  Imilor  is underestimated 

Attractive valuation – 4.5x P/E '14 – does not reflect robust shareholder returns 

Novatek (TP $145/GDR) – Robust growth and catalysts 

Strong execution track‐record, value‐accretive expansion projects and vast resource base have justified Novatek's valuation premium… 

…  which  we  expect  to  persist  going  forward,  given  Novatek's  robust  growth prospects and investment returns 

Anticipated  growth  is  significantly  above  the  sector  average,  accelerating  in  the second half of the decade once Gydan fields and Yamal LNG come on‐stream 

The  stock  is  especially  attractive  in  the  short  term,  given  numerous  up‐coming catalysts de‐risking Novatek's flagship Yamal LNG project (19% of our fair value) 

Industry  regulatory  risks  –  including  slower  domestic  tariff  growth  and  gas  and condensate MET hike – are already in the price 

Gazprom Neft (TP $25/GDR) – Robust growth, highest shareholder returns 

Highest  shareholder  returns over  the next  two  years  (3% pa  EPS  growth  and  6% dividend yield) 

Robust FCF generation  in the  long‐term (c$16bn during 2017‐21, three quarters of the current market cap) 

Valuation implies a 27% discount to peers vs 13% during 2010‐12 

Large portfolio of greenfield projects (1.1mmboe/d hydrocarbon production) is not in the price, while additional tax breaks imply further potential upside 

Catalysts  include  additional  greenfield  tax  breaks,  transfer  of  oil  licenses  from Gazprom and potential liquidity improvement, however, outcomes are twofold and timing is uncertain 

Bashneft (TP Rb2,100/share) – Attractive dividend play 

Robust  FCF  generation despite  refinery upgrade CapEx: we  estimate  FCF  yield  to average 11% during 2013‐16e (vs sector average of 5%) 

The highest dividend yield during 2009‐11 thanks to the company's flexible dividend policy (distribute generated FCF) 

High interim dividend (Rb150/share; 8% yield on common, 12% yield on preferred) to be paid by year‐end 

A potential London IPO next year would improve liquidity, expand the investor base and finance resource base growth and asset acquisitions 

Valuation premium but  justified –  reflects strong execution  track  record and solid shareholder returns (6.5x P/E '14 vs sector's 5.7x) 

  

1 For risks to BCS theses and valuation methodology, please refer to pages 24‐26 

Russian Oil & Gas 

8

 Hold   

Rosneft (TP $8.30/GDR) – Shareholder returns captive to high CapEx 

Solid financial position and immense FCF generation capabilities  

TNK‐BP merger synergies have yet to be monetized, reflected in stock valuation 

Primary beneficiary of the greenfield tax reform proposals… 

… due to  largest portfolio of greenfield projects, potentially translating  into robust returns in the long term 

However, large CapEx requirements in coming decade… 

…  restrain  near‐term  shareholder  returns  to  the  3%  dividend  yield,  one  of  the lowest among peers 

Gazprom (TP $9/GDR) – World’s cheapest energy name, for good cause 

World's cheapest energy name (2014e P/E of 3.4x) reflects poor ROI  

Stock value is worth Gazprom's future dividend stream 

Dividend  yield,  currently  5%, will  be  among  highest  of  peers,  once management approves the 35% IFRS dividend payout (9% vs 5%) 

However, vast number of expansion projects will absorb most FCF… 

… and earnings growth will contribute little to valuation  

Surgutneftegas  pref  (TP  Rb24/share)  –  Falling  FCF  to  underscore  prefs’ relative attractiveness 

The highest, most stable and defensive dividend among sector peers; 

Preferreds'  dividend  favored  over  commons'  on  higher  (9%  vs  2%), more  stable payout… 

… potentially  leading  to a narrower preferred‐common  spread  (15%  today, down from 49% three years ago) 

   

Russian Oil & Gas 

9

Sell   

Surgutneftegas  (TP $8.50/GDR) – Falling FCF to underscore prefs’ relative attractiveness 

Common share dividend payout pressured by negative FCF during 2014‐16… 

… due to limited upside from crude production and rising CapEx 

Preferreds'  dividend  favored  over  commons'  on  higher  (9%  vs  2%), more  stable payout… 

… potentially  leading  to a narrower preferred‐common  spread  (15%  today, down from 49% three years ago) 

Conservative  use  of  $32bn  'war  chest'  not  value‐accretive  to  shareholders; M&A/greenfield development could generate 3‐fold the return 

Tatneft (TP $40/GDR) – Premium unjustified 

Robust upstream FCF ($16/bbl vs Rosneft's $14/bbl, Lukoil's $15/bbl)… 

… is not translating into attractive shareholder returns:  

o 30% RAS payout implies one of lowest dividend yields (4%), zero EPS growth; 

o Uninspiring  investment  returns  on  Taneco  refinery  –  Taneco  upgrade/ expansion is estimated to cost c30% more than average, and bitumen reserves development, whose scale/profitability is uncertain; 

Valuation premium to peers is unsustainable, in our view, taking into account some other companies' superior shareholder returns 

Alliance Oil (TP SEK 41/share) – Risk‐reward skewed to the downside 

Risk of consensus earnings downgrade – consensus too bullish… 

…  BCS  2013‐15e  EPS  forecast  is  15%  below  consensus;  BCS  2012‐15e  EPS  CAGR estimate of 1% compares to consensus' 4% 

Delay  in  the  refinery’s  commercial  start  and  connection  to  ESPO  until  2H14  is equivalent to c$150mn of foregone EBITDA 

Robust  FCF  once  upgraded  refinery  is  operational  and  connection  to  ESPO  could fully deleverage the balance sheet by 2018… 

… but search for further production growth will require significant investment, thus putting pressure on near‐term shareholder returns 

Current valuation (4.4x EV/EBITDA  '14e)  is  inflated by speculation over a potential takeover by Rosneft (25 July, Vedomosti) and is not fundamentally justified 

Transneft pref (TP Rb75,000/share) – Risk‐reward not worth the gamble 

Robust FCF – $10bn during 2013‐15 – is encouraging hope in higher dividends 

Preferred share price aggressive, assumes 2013e IFRS payout of 20% (vs 3% in 2012) 

Risk‐reward unattractive:  

o potential downside (82%) (no change in dividend policy)  

o exceeds upside (53%) (35% IFRS payout)  

No guarantee holders of preferred shares will benefit from IFRS‐based payout, since the charter does not stipulate that the dividend paid on preferred shares (10% RAS net income) be at the level paid on commons 

 

   

Russian Oil & Gas 

10

 Stock picking in a challenging sector 

Pressure  on  the  budget  leads  to  sector  instability.  In  our  sector  initiation  report, Russian  Oil  &  Gas:  Greenfields  –  key  to  profitability  and  stability  (1  August),  we concluded that Russian federal budget revenues, half of which come from the oil & gas sector,  face  significant  downside  risks  in  coming  years  and  that  the  government will likely  look  for ways  to  compensate  for  any  shortfall.  The  government’s  actions  in  the past month proved our point: 

Next year’s freeze in gas tariffs should save consumers over $2bn pa; 

The  crude oil  tax  reshuffle has hit  refining‐heavy  companies and  should generate 

over $2.5bn pa of extra revenues for the government. 

According to our analysis, the government will still be at  least c$10bn short of current tax inflows by the end of the decade. A tax increase is the most efficient tool to address this problem. Given numerous projects which,  assuming  a  stable macro environment, will generate substantial returns (in excess of 30% IRR), especially in the refining and gas sectors, additional tax hikes in the coming years are highly likely. 

Upstream companies with multiple greenfields are investors’ best long‐term play. Such regulatory risks, i.e., risks of unexpected tax hikes, tariff growth deceleration and so on, are the primary factors that prevent global energy investors from investing long term in the  Russian  oil  &  gas  sector,  as  we  found  out  during  our  two‐week  roadshow  in September  among  global  equity  fund  managers  (refer  to  the  feedback  from  the meetings Russian Oil & Gas: What YOU think of the sector, 25 September).  Indeed,  last year’s gas MET saga is still fresh in the minds of the many investors who lost millions of dollars on the stocks’ volatility. 

We do not expect regulatory risks to be any  lower going forward. On the contrary, the more acute  the  issue with budget revenues becomes, the higher the taxation risks are going  to be. Having analyzed  the  returns of each oil & gas  subsector and every major project, we  have  concluded  that  investors’  safest  long‐term  bet  are  companies with large  exposure  to  upstream  (already  heavily  taxed)  and  with  the  largest  amount  of greenfields  (minimum  investment  returns guaranteed). These  companies are Gazprom Neft, Lukoil and Rosneft. 

Dividends  –  a  bird  in  hand  is worth  two  in  the  bush. Monetization  of  the  value  of upstream greenfields,  for which  the new  tax  regulation guarantees a minimum  return rate,  is,  in most  cases,  too  far off. On a  shorter horizon,  investors are better off with opportunistic dividend plays, we think. These are Bashneft, Gazprom and Lukoil. 

Bashneft: the new dividend king. Unlike peers undergoing a major CapEx cycle and investing  in  future growth, Bashneft  is already enjoying  rising output,  lower OpEx and  CapEx  and,  therefore, will  continue  churning  healthy  FCF.  The  company  has moderate leverage and hence could distribute most of its FCF as dividends as per its dividend policy. We estimate that investors could receive a third of its market cap in the  next  three  years  by  investing  in  preferred  shares.  This makes  Bashneft  the highest dividend paying oil & gas stock in Russia. 

Gazprom:  the  35%  IFRS  payout  creates  an  attractive  bull  case.  State‐owned companies  are  to  pay  35%  of  IFRS  net  income  as  dividends  starting  from  2016, based on the government’s recent resolution. If confirmed by Gazprom, this would have major  valuation  implications,  since  consensus dividend expectations  are  the major  driver  for  the  company’s  shares.  Based  on  a  dividend  discount  model, adoption of a higher dividend payout would translate into an additional $3/GDR of value, or a third of the current share price. 

Lukoil:  highly  committed  to  dividend  growth.  In  pursuing  market  cap  growth, management  has  chosen  the most  efficient  tool  to  achieve  its  goals.  Lukoil  has posted the highest dividend growth in the last three years (20% CAGR) and plans to maintain such pace going forward. Unlike its peers, Lukoil has passed the bottom of the CapEx cycle and starting from next year should see the fruit of past investments. Its  FCF  profile  adds  significant  credibility  to  management’s  ambitious  dividend growth target (15% pa). 

Investors’ safest long‐term play is oil companies with high exposure to upstream and greenfields 

 Source: BCS 

 

 

   

  

 

 

  

 Gazprom minorities are primary beneficiaries of the 35% dividend payout requirement 

Source: FactSet, BCS 

Greenfield exposure

Upstream exposure

Gazprom Neft

Rosneft

BashneftLukoil

Tatneft

Alliance Oil

SurgutNG

6.7%

3.5%

0.8%

Gazprom Rosneft Transneft (pref)

35% IFRS

25% IFRS

9.3%

4.9%

Russian Oil & Gas 

11

Bashneft – the major with unparalleled dividends   O&G companies nearly trebled dividend payments since 2008 

Source: Company data, FactSet, BCS

Three momentum plays, or stocks to avoid on short side of a pair trade in near term: 

Novatek: news flow de‐risking Yamal LNG. The project  is awaiting new partner(s), pre‐sale of LNG volumes and FID. Yamal LNG is long‐term, complicated and capital‐intensive; however, in the short term, the Novatek stock offers an attractive play on catalysts,  which  in  the  past  have  proved  to  drive  the  share  price.  Moreover, Novatek  is very  likely to beat  its FY13 output guidance as Gazprom’s continuously rising  gas  exports  have  created  a  window  of  opportunity  for  independent  gas producers on the domestic market. 

Lukoil: oil price  stabilization and West Qurna‐2  launch. The  stock was  the worst performer  during  the  late  oil  price  rally  despite  in‐line  performance  in  previous years. This underperformance and the company’s low sensitivity to oil price changes make  the  stock one of  the most defensive  instruments  for withstanding oil price stabilization. Moreover, successful delivery of West Qurna‐2 in November should lift most investors’ concerns, de‐risk c$3bn of next year’s FCF and add credibility to the continued increase in dividends. 

Gazprom: dividend discussions, robust gas sales and the pending agreement with China.  In  the  short  term,  Gazprom  is  the  best  exposure  to  the  dividend  payout increase  imposed  by  the  government.  Moreover,  the  company  will  continue enjoying rising gas exports to Europe. This has limited valuation implications, but it should  improve sentiment  towards  the stock. Finally,  the  long‐awaited agreement to supply profitable gas volumes to China is just around the corner. 

Maximizing  returns  and  hedging  risks with  pair  trades.  Although  there  is  not much upside  across  the  sector,  the  range  between  the  highest  upside  and  downside  is  still significant to generate returns on the long‐short trades, we believe. 

Short‐term pair trades: Playing the momentum themes and catalysts 

Lukoil vs Rosneft 

o Anticipating  the  oil  price  stabilization.  The  oil  price  seems  to  have  traded ahead of fundamentals: the excess supply of oil from the non‐OPEC members is significant and the fears of the Syrian crisis escalating to the nearby countries are easing. Falling crude price  traditionally accompanied by a similar move  in oil  companies’  shares will  draw  investor  interest  to more  defensive  names. Rosneft’s high leverage has made the company one of the most sensitive to oil price changes and, therefore, ill‐suited to hide in from the declining oil price. 

o Lukoil: The launch of the long‐awaited West Qurna‐2 in November should de‐risk  up  to  10%  of  the  company’s  value.  As  we  have  discussed  in  Lukoil: Approaching  the  turning  point  (10  September),  the  Iraqi  operations  will contribute  up  to  $3bn  of  FCF  next  year  in  the  form  of  the  historical  cost recovery, which the market does not have in its forecasts yet. 

o Rosneft: Value  implications  from  the  corporate activity are overblown.  The company  has  pulled  many  rabbits  out  of  its  hat  in  the  last  year,  but  the contribution  to  the  shareholder  value  has  been  neutral, we  estimate. Given 

30%

22%20%

18%17% 16%

11%

8%7%

5%

2%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%Bashneft

(pref)

SurgutNG

(pref)

Bashneft

Gazprom

Lukoil

Gazprom

Neft

Tatneft

Rosneft

Novatek

SurgutNG

Transneft

(pref)

2015e 2014e 2013e

5.4

7.0 7.66.3 6.7

9.6

16.4

13.9

15.8

19.1

16.6

0

5

10

15

20

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

$bn TNK‐BP Russian O&G (ex‐TNK‐BP)

Pick defensive stocks as the oil price stabilizes* 

 * Sensitivity to the $10/bbl oil price decline 

Source: FactSet, BCS  

 

 

‐8%

‐4%

‐5%

‐5%

‐2%

‐3%

‐2%

2%

3%

‐12%

‐9%

‐7%

‐5%

‐4%

‐4%

‐2%

2%

5%

‐15% ‐10% ‐5% 0% 5%

Gazprom

Rosneft

Tatneft

SurgutNG

Lukoil

Novatek

GazpromNeft

Bashneft

Alliance Oil

Net income EBITDA

Russian Oil & Gas 

12

Rosneft’s  scale,  any  future  acquisitions  or  resource  base  expansion,  new contracts with customers or strategic alliances will have little value implications and should not trigger re‐rating of shares. 

Gazprom Neft vs Surgutneftegas 

o Valuation does not match shareholder  returns. Gazprom Neft  is  trading at a 25% discount to Surgutneftegas despite the superior dividend yield (6% vs 2%) and growth (‐6% EPS CAGR 2013‐15 vs ‐21%). 

o Exposure to ruble  is not a differentiating  factor. Both companies are equally better off from weaker ruble. Although Surgutneftegas’ bottom line enjoys the FX gain contribution, it does not translate into additional FCF and the dividend uplift is insignificant given the common shares’ modest yield. 

o Exposure  to  the greenfield  tax  regulation  (to  come  into effect  in  January)  is the key profitability driver, in our view. Among Russian oil producers, Gazprom Neft  has  one  of  the  largest  portfolios  of  greenfield  projects  that  is  still  not appreciated  by  the  investor  community.  The  value  of  tax  savings  under  the proposed greenfield  legislation  is worth $3/GDR  for Gazprom Neft, or 14% of its  current  value,  we  estimate.  Surgutneftegas,  in  turn,  has  the  smallest amount of greenfields. 

Alliance Oil (pref) vs Alliance Oil 

o Guaranteed income vs corporate risk. Even though preferred shares may have limited  share price appreciation potential,  the  instrument  generates a  stable 10% annualized return paid quarterly. Common shares, which have traded up in  the  last  two months on  the unconfirmed speculation over  the  takeover by Rosneft  (Vedomosti,  25  July),  are  susceptible  to  all  company‐specific  risks of which, in Alliance Oil’s case, there are many (refinery launch delay, M&A). 

Long‐term pair trades: It is all about returns 

Lukoil vs Rosneft 

o Higher shareholder returns. Lukoil shareholders will benefit  in the short term from  the  company’s  exposure  to  profitable  greenfields  (Caspian  fields, Uzbekistan  ramp‐up, West Qurna‐2  launch,  the  start  of  Imilor,  etc).  Lukoil’s production growth until 2015  is 4% pa, on average, vs Rosneft’s 1%, and  the cumulative dividend is almost twice higher. 

o Lukoil: Aligned  interests. Lukoil’s management  is committed  to market value growth and has wisely chosen the most effective instrument to achieve its goal –  the  dividend.  Purchase  of  shares  by management  also  contributes  to  the positive sentiment. Whatever management’s motivation, the key point  is that minorities’ interests are closely aligned with those of management. 

o Rosneft: Scale comes at a price. Rosneft carries the primary responsibility for the Russian oil  industry. The company has the  largest portfolio of greenfields, but  will  require  billions  of  dollars  to  finance  the  development.  To  ensure continuous  oil  production,  Rosneft  may  accelerate  the  development  of  its projects and  look  for ways  to expand  the  resource base. Thus,  the  company may find itself in a permanent CapEx cycle with shareholder interest taking the backseat. 

Novatek vs Gazprom 

o Investment  return differential. Gazprom’s ROE averaged 17% during 2010‐12 vs  Novatek’s  30%.  Going  forward,  the  difference  may  widen  further  as Gazprom  proceeds  with  the  capital‐intensive  Eastern  Gas  Program,  South Stream  and Nord  Stream expansion,  all of which  are NPV‐negative or  value‐neutral  at  best,  we  estimate.  Novatek’s  approach  to  investing  is  more disciplined with the projects’ IRR above 30%. 

o Gazprom:  Subject  to  higher  tax  risk.  Searching  for  alternative  tax  revenue sources,  the government may, as  it has already proved so several  times, hike taxes  on  the most  profitable  sectors  and  companies. Gazprom  is  generating robust  profitability  on  export  sales  of  gas  and  liquids  and  is  enjoying  solid 

Russian Oil & Gas 

13

balance sheet (0.5x net debt / EBITDA). While the government is attempting to make  the  tax  mechanism  more  transparent,  additional  ad  hoc  taxation  is possible if necessary, and Gazprom will remain its primary target, we believe. 

o Novatek: Attractive  risk‐reward. Most of  the  risks  that dominated sentiment around Novatek in the last year seem to have materialized and been priced in (slowed gas tariff growth, higher taxes and Rosneft’s emergence as a gas giant). The  company’s bull  case  includes  steeper  ramp‐up of profitable  liquids  sales (condensate  and  refined  products),  domestic  customer  base  expansion  via acquisition  of  regional  gas marketers,  infrastructure  and  existing  producing assets and taking advantage of Gazprom’s expiring agreements. 

Gazprom vs Transneft (pref) 

o Exposure to the dividend payout  increase. Both companies are subject to the government’s request to increase the dividend payout to 35% IFRS from 2016. Gazprom’s potential yield could nearly double to 9%. Implications for Transneft (pref) holders are not straightforward: unless management guarantees (though is not required to) a similar dividend for both classes of shares, the risk of the dividend uplift being absorbed solely by the common shares is high. 

o Gazprom: a dividend play. As we have already discussed, Gazprom  is one of the best exposures to the dividend increase. Not just its dividend would be the highest  among  Russian  O&G  companies,  but  also  its  share  price  highly correlated with consensus dividend expectations could see significant re‐rating (by 30%, we estimate). 

o Transneft (pref): Dividend increase is not carved in stone. The company stated on  numerous  occasions  that  it  has  no  intention  of  benefiting  its  minority shareholders,  i.e.,  holders  of  preferred  shares,  via  higher  dividends.  The company  has  no  legal  obligation  to  guarantee  a  similar  dividend  for  both classes of shares and therefore could award the entire dividend increase to the government, i.e., the holder of all common shares. Such scenario is even more likely in light of the growing budget deficit, a problem which will become more acute after 2015 as O&G tax revenues start declining, on our estimates. 

Misperceived high‐risk stocks. Finally, there are three investment stories that we advise to avoid due to absence of clarity on future development and, therefore, high associated risks. 

Transneft (pref): Dividends, the shares’ sole driver, are at risk. The charter outlines the 10% RAS dividend payout on preferred shares and does not require dividends for  two classes of shares  to be equal. Once  the company adopts  the  IFRS payout, management will have  full discretion  to allocate  the dividend  increase among  the commons  and  preferreds.  In  the  absence  of  any  incentive  to  benefit  holders  of preferred  shares,  management  may  award  the  dividend  increase  to  the government, the sole owner of the common shares.  

Alliance Oil: Valuation ignores execution risks. Alliance Oil is yet to disappoint with the  delayed  launch  of  the  refinery  and  the  subsequent  consensus’  forecast downgrade. The current asset portfolio does not ensure sustainable production, nor does it benefit the company in the ongoing sector transformation (tax burden shift from  upstream  to  downstream).  This  raises M&A  and  execution  risks, which  the company has not scored well on in the past. 

Tatneft:  Lowest  shareholder  returns.  The  company  could  have  been  the  FCF generation  benchmark  among Russian O&G  companies, were  it  not  for  its  costly Taneco  refinery.  The  robust  FCF witnessed  over  the  past  year  is  at  its  dawn  as management proceeds with the Taneco expansion and upgrade. On our estimates, the  refinery’s  break‐even  costs  (including  investments  made  in  the  past)  are $22/bbl  vs  the  average  Russian  refining  margin  of  $9/bbl  ($14/bbl  after  the upgrade). 

     

Russian Oil & Gas 

14

Lukoil – Financial and Operational Summary 

Source: Company data, FactSet, BCS 

 

 

 

   

Key price assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Market statistics

Crude oil ($/bbl) Share Price ($) 64.00

Brent 80 111 112 108 103 97 Market Cap ($mn) 48,311

Urals 77 109 110 107 102 97 EV ($mn) 55,077

Domestic (Samara) 36 49 50 49 48 47

Crack spreads ($/bbl) Income Statement ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

Gasoline 16 17 23 21 20 21 Revenue 104,956 133,650 139,171 140,947 143,055 139,885

Diesel 12 17 19 18 16 16 Opex -7,969 -9,055 -9,359 -10,030 -9,820 -9,944

Jet fuel 15 22 23 22 21 21 Purchased oil -43,579 -59,694 -64,148 -65,751 -64,628 -61,785

Fuel oil -21 -30 -26 -32 -30 -26 Taxes other than income tax -8,978 -12,918 -13,666 -14,017 -14,050 -14,296

Gas, domestic Excise and export duties -18,878 -22,217 -22,836 -22,074 -20,573 -20,418

$/mcm 82 98 99 110 116 118 Other operating costs -9,865 -12,138 -10,260 -10,377 -10,597 -11,209

$/mcf 2.3 2.8 2.8 3.1 3.3 3.3 EBITDA 15,687 17,628 18,902 18,698 23,387 22,231

Depreciation 4,154 4,473 4,832 5,966 12,043 11,265

Macro assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Operating income 11,533 13,155 14,070 12,732 11,344 10,967

USD/RUB 30.36 29.39 31.04 31.81 32.60 32.90 Finance expenses -538 -483 -281 -223 -371 -302

CPI 8.2% 6.0% 6.0% 6.1% 5.0% 5.0% Other expense/income 475 447 -66 418 519 556

Pre-tax income 11,470 13,119 13,723 12,928 11,493 11,221

Production 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Income taxes -2,351 -3,293 -2,798 -3,080 -2,643 -2,581

Crude oil Minority interest/other -113 531 79 23 23 23

annual output (mmt) 96 91 90 91 93 97 Net income 9,006 10,357 11,004 9,870 8,873 8,663

daily output (kbd) 1,920 1,821 1,790 1,813 1,858 1,934 Fully diluted EPS ($) 10.94 12.96 14.09 12.64 11.36 11.09

Refined products

annual output (mmt) 64 63 64 62 62 62 Balance sheet ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

daily output (kbd) 1,272 1,253 1,272 1,243 1,244 1,244 Cash 2,368 2,753 2,914 3,167 3,167 3,167

light product yield 69% 69% 73% 73% 73% 76% Inventories 6,231 7,533 8,098 8,082 8,064 8,133

Gas (bcm) 18.6 18.6 19.9 20.5 20.8 24.2 Accounts receivable 8,219 8,921 8,667 9,243 9,013 9,126

Other current assets 3,799 4,322 4,594 3,799 3,799 3,799

Reserves (SEC) Total current assets 20,617 23,529 24,273 24,291 24,042 24,225

1P 2P 1P+2P 3P 1P+2P+3P Fixed assets 54,629 56,803 66,883 79,164 83,335 88,927

Oil (bn bbl) 13.4 5.9 19.3 3.7 23.0 Other non-current assets 8,771 10,860 7,805 7,895 7,895 7,895

Gas (bcm) 665 304 969 101 1,070 Total non-current assets 63,400 67,663 74,688 87,059 91,230 96,822

Total (bn boe) 17.3 7.7 25.0 4.3 29.3 Total assets 84,017 91,192 98,961 111,350 115,273 121,048

EV/Reserves ($/boe) 3.2 2.2 1.9 Short-term debt 2,125 1,792 658 1,751 0 1,012

Reserve life (years) 22 32 37 Accounts payable 5,607 5,995 7,263 8,168 7,691 7,757

Other current liabilities 3,043 3,321 4,532 5,326 5,326 5,326

Financial ratios 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Total current liabilities 10,775 11,108 12,453 15,245 13,017 14,095

Valuation Long-term debt 9,069 7,300 5,963 8,774 8,532 7,344

P/E (x) 5.4 4.7 4.4 4.9 5.4 5.6 Other non-current liabilities 4,976 5,146 7,338 7,851 7,828 7,805

PEG (x) 18.9 31.1 70.3 NM NM NM Total non-current liabilities 14,045 12,446 13,301 16,625 16,360 15,149

P/B (x) 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 Total shareholders' equity 59,197 67,638 73,207 79,480 85,896 91,803

EV/EBITDA (x) 3.5 3.1 2.9 2.9 2.4 2.5 Total liabilities and equity 84,017 91,192 98,961 111,350 115,273 121,048

EV/DACF (x) 3.6 3.1 3.2 3.4 2.5 2.7

Dividend yield (%) 3.0% 4.0% 4.5% 5.1% 5.7% 6.5% Cash flow statement ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

FCF Yield (%) 14.6% 15.4% 16.1% 4.7% 9.3% 6.1% Net income 9,006 10,357 11,004 9,870 8,873 8,663

Profitability Depreciation 4,154 4,473 4,832 5,966 12,043 11,265

EBITDA Margin (%) 15% 13% 14% 13% 16% 16% Changes in working capital -826 -1,529 2,474 440 -229 -117

EBIT Margin (%) 11% 10% 10% 9% 8% 8% Other 1,207 2,213 687 62 0 0

Net Margin (%) 9% 8% 8% 7% 6% 6% Operating cash flow 13,541 15,514 18,997 16,338 20,687 19,811

Leverage Capex -6,468 -8,093 -11,235 -14,091 -16,215 -16,857

Gross Debt/Equity (x) 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Acquisitions -813 -2,655 -1,060 -2,435 0 0

Net Debt/Equity (x) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Other -15 -25 -921 -849 0 0

Gross Debt/EBITDA (x) 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.4 Investing cash flow -7,296 -10,773 -13,216 -17,375 -16,215 -16,857

Net Debt/EBITDA (x) 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 Change in debt 35 -2,004 -1,266 3,902 -1,993 -175

Net Interest Cover (x) 21.4 27.2 50.1 57.2 30.6 36.3 Dividends -1,556 -1,830 -2,913 -2,532 -2,456 -2,756

Returns Other -4,625 -2,189 -1,501 -21 -23 -23

ROE (%) 16% 16% 16% 13% 11% 10% Financing cash flow -6,146 -6,023 -5,680 1,349 -4,473 -2,954

ROACE (%) 14% 14% 15% 12% 10% 9% Effect of Forex -5 -93 60 -59 0 0

ROA (%) 11% 12% 12% 9% 8% 7% Increase (decrease) in cash flow 94 -1,375 161 253 0 0

Russian Oil & Gas 

15

Gazprom Neft – Financial and Operational Summary 

Source: Company data, FactSet, BCS  

 

   

Key price assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Market statistics

Crude oil ($/bbl) Share Price ($) 22.32

Brent 80 111 112 108 103 97 Market Cap ($mn) 21,061

Urals 77 109 110 107 102 97 EV ($mn) 25,815

Domestic (Samara) 36 49 50 49 48 47

Crack spreads ($/bbl) Income Statement ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

Gasoline 16 17 23 21 20 21 Revenue 32,772 44,172 48,818 44,565 43,628 42,686

Diesel 12 17 19 18 16 16 Opex -2,111 -2,464 -3,974 -4,623 -4,823 -4,844

Jet fuel 15 22 23 22 21 21 Purchased oil -7,459 -10,817 -13,869 -9,552 -8,604 -8,519

Fuel oil -21 -30 -26 -32 -30 -26 Taxes other than income tax -5,240 -8,038 -8,090 -9,580 -9,365 -8,931

Gas, domestic Excise and export duties -6,631 -8,092 -9,240 -7,009 -6,761 -6,968

$/mcm 82 98 99 110 116 118 Other operating costs -5,054 -5,819 -5,415 -5,217 -5,244 -5,385

$/mcf 2.3 2.8 2.8 3.1 3.3 3.3 EBITDA 6,277 8,942 8,230 8,583 8,831 8,039

Depreciation 1,619 1,963 1,883 2,364 2,355 2,350

Macro assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Operating income 4,658 6,979 6,347 6,219 6,476 5,688

USD/RUB 30.36 29.39 31.04 31.81 32.60 32.90 Finance expenses -288 -263 -257 -200 -199 -194

CPI 8.2% 6.0% 6.0% 6.1% 5.0% 5.0% Other expense/income -93 115 942 45 27 27

Pre-tax income 4,277 6,831 7,031 6,064 6,305 5,521

Production 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Income taxes -844 -1,244 -1,155 -1,118 -1,268 -1,111

Crude oil Minority interest/other -285 -235 -253 -210 -219 -191

annual output (mmt) 50 50 51 50 53 53 Net income 3,148 5,352 5,623 4,736 4,818 4,219

daily output (kbd) 1,003 1,009 1,017 1,001 1,051 1,062 Fully diluted EPS ($) 3.34 5.67 5.96 5.02 5.11 4.47

Refined products

annual output (mmt) 38 41 44 44 43 43 Balance sheet ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

daily output (kbd) 754 824 884 871 865 863 Cash 1,146 914 2,488 3,002 3,567 3,533

light product yield 64% 61% 62% 63% 63% 63% Inventories 1,862 2,343 2,890 2,537 2,307 2,355

Gas (bcm) 4.0 8.7 11.3 14.3 15.1 16.8 Accounts receivable 2,566 3,562 2,180 2,175 2,180 2,160

Other current assets 1,519 2,252 4,344 4,269 4,269 4,269

Reserves (PRMS) Total current assets 7,093 9,071 11,902 11,983 12,323 12,317

1P 2P 1P+2P 3P 1P+2P+3P Fixed assets 15,914 19,313 21,914 27,201 30,716 33,460

Total (bn boe) 8.3 5.9 14.2 5.3 19.5 Other non-current assets 9,057 8,299 8,744 6,336 6,381 6,424

EV/Reserves ($/bbl) 3.1 1.8 1.3 Total non-current assets 24,971 27,612 30,657 33,537 37,097 39,883

Reserve life (years) 19 32 44 Total assets 32,064 36,683 42,560 45,520 49,421 52,200

Short-term debt 1,694 1,277 2,167 2,356 2,632 2,168

Financial ratios 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Accounts payable 2,730 3,075 2,942 4,308 4,058 4,110

Valuation Other current liabilities 427 65 1,249 1,002 1,002 1,002

P/E (x) 6.7 3.9 3.7 4.4 4.4 5.0 Total current liabilities 4,851 4,417 6,358 7,666 7,692 7,280

PEG (x) 149.3 5.6 73.8 NM 251.2 NM Long-term debt 4,942 5,420 5,448 6,379 6,379 6,379

P/B (x) 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 Other non-current liabilities 3,584 3,334 3,423 4,168 4,387 4,580

EV/EBITDA (x) 4.1 2.9 3.1 3.0 2.9 3.2 Total non-current liabilities 8,526 8,754 8,871 10,547 10,766 10,959

EV/DACF (x) 4.7 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.2 3.0 Total shareholders' equity 18,687 23,512 27,330 27,307 30,963 33,996

Dividend yield (%) 3.3% 5.6% 6.7% 5.7% 5.8% 5.1% Total liabilities and equity 32,064 36,683 42,560 45,520 49,421 52,235

FCF Yield (%) 11.3% 6.2% 8.4% 8.2% 5.1% 8.7%

Profitability Cash flow statement ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

EBITDA Margin (%) 19% 20% 17% 19% 20% 19% Net income 3,433 5,587 5,877 4,946 5,037 4,410

EBIT Margin (%) 14% 16% 13% 14% 15% 13% Depreciation 1,619 1,963 1,883 2,364 2,355 2,350

Net Margin (%) 10% 12% 12% 11% 11% 10% Changes in working capital 247 -2,359 -296 203 -25 25

Leverage Other 93 810 -76 180 614 1,577

Gross Debt/Equity (x) 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Operating cash flow 5,392 6,001 7,388 7,693 7,981 8,362

Net Debt/Equity (x) 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 Capex -3,292 -4,029 -5,019 -5,702 -7,094 -6,714

Gross Debt/EBITDA (x) 1.1 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 Acquisitions -1,536 -1,156 -146 -10 0 0

Net Debt/EBITDA (x) 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 Other -24 -289 -203 -411 0 0

Net Interest Cover (x) 16.2 26.5 24.7 31.1 32.6 29.3 Investing cash flow -4,852 -5,474 -5,368 -6,122 -7,094 -6,714

Returns Change in debt 419 273 819 940 276 -464

ROE (%) 18% 25% 22% 17% 17% 13% Dividends -728 -1,025 0 -1,442 -1,196 -1,217

ROACE (%) 16% 21% 17% 16% 15% 12% Other 0 0 -1,206 -94 0 0

ROA (%) 10% 16% 14% 11% 10% 8% Financing cash flow -309 -752 -387 -596 -921 -1,681

Effect of Forex 47 -7 -60 104 0 0

Increase (decrease) in cash flow 278 -232 1,574 1,079 -34 -33

Russian Oil & Gas 

16

Bashneft – Financial and Operational Summary 

Source: Company data, FactSet, BCS 

 

   

Key price assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Market statistics

Crude oil ($/bbl) Share Price (ords) ($/share) 58.53

Brent 80 111 112 108 103 97 Share Price (prefs) ($/share) 40.43

Urals 77 109 110 107 102 97 Market Cap ($mn) 11,045

Domestic (Samara) 36 49 50 49 48 47 EV ($mn) 14,802

Crack spreads ($/bbl)

Gasoline 16 17 23 21 20 21 Income Statement ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

Diesel 12 17 19 18 16 16 Revenue 13,341 16,549 17,155 17,120 16,574 16,160

Jet fuel 15 22 23 22 21 21 Opex -2,665 -1,684 -1,728 -1,750 -1,702 -1,697

Fuel oil -21 -30 -26 -32 -30 -26 Purchased oil -2,882 -3,994 -4,022 -3,781 -3,588 -3,525

Taxes other than income tax -1,421 -2,052 -2,149 -2,204 -2,131 -2,073

Macro assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Excise and export duties -2,753 -4,231 -4,649 -4,917 -4,663 -4,593

USD/RUB 30.36 29.39 31.04 31.81 32.60 32.90 Other operating costs -1,116 -1,396 -1,427 -1,437 -1,428 -1,453

CPI 8.2% 6.0% 6.0% 6.1% 5.0% 5.0% EBITDA 2,504 3,192 3,179 3,030 3,061 2,818

Depreciation 711 616 592 593 633 670

Production 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Operating income 1,793 2,576 2,587 2,437 2,429 2,148

Crude oil Finance expenses -290 -434 -228 -175 -298 -220

annual output (mmt) 14.1 15.1 15.4 15.6 15.7 15.7 Other expense/income 34 62 -8 -24 32 137

daily output (kbd) 283 302 309 311 314 314 Pre-tax income 1,537 2,204 2,351 2,239 2,162 2,065

Refined products Income taxes -468 -513 -529 -474 -432 -413

annual output (mmt) 19.4 19.2 18.9 19.2 19.0 19.0 Minority interest/dividends -116 5 -144 -12 -14 -13

daily output (kbd) 389 384 378 384 380 380 Net income 953 1,696 1,678 1,753 1,716 1,639

light product yield 64% 64% 64% 64% 65% 67% Fully diluted EPS ($) 4.65 8.28 7.77 7.71 7.55 7.21

Reserves (PRMS) Balance sheet ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

1P 2P 1P+2P 3P 1P+2P+3P Cash 1,067 881 658 40 248 216

Oil (bn bbl) 2.0 0.5 2.5 0.7 3.2 Inventories 625 748 780 825 739 749

EV/Reserves ($/bbl) 7.4 5.8 4.6 Accounts receivable 1,208 1,395 1,666 1,599 1,571 1,571

Reserve life (years) 18 22 28 Other current assets 852 1,245 876 800 800 800

Total current assets 3,752 4,269 3,981 3,265 3,359 3,336

Financial ratios 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Fixed assets 9,552 7,882 9,073 9,253 9,817 10,362

Valuation Other non-current assets 1,687 1,422 2,120 2,478 2,936 3,277

P/E (x) 11.6 6.5 6.6 6.3 6.4 6.7 Total non-current assets 11,239 9,304 11,192 11,731 12,753 13,639

PEG (x) 9.1 8.4 NM 140.9 NM NM Total assets 14,991 13,573 15,173 14,996 16,111 16,975

P/B (x) 2.1 2.0 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.1 Short-term debt 795 420 1,048 455 455 455

EV/EBITDA (x) 5.9 4.6 4.7 4.9 4.8 5.3 Accounts payable 1,071 1,242 1,308 1,538 1,239 1,255

EV/DACF (x) 7.0 5.5 6.8 7.1 6.5 6.5 Other current liabilities 650 632 487 227 227 227

Dividend yield (ords) (%) 13.3% 5.8% 1.4% 8.0% 6.0% 6.2% Total current liabilities 2,516 2,294 2,842 2,220 1,921 1,937

Dividend yield (prefs) (%) 19.2% 8.3% 2.0% 11.6% 8.8% 9.0% Long-term debt 3,118 2,965 2,560 3,281 2,981 2,981

FCF Yield (%) 13.0% 14.9% 12.8% 11.3% 10.2% 8.8% Other non-current liabilities 4,082 2,704 1,817 1,705 1,719 1,732

Profitability Total non-current liabilities 7,200 5,669 4,377 4,986 4,700 4,713

EBITDA Margin (%) 19% 19% 19% 18% 18% 17% Total shareholders' equity 5,275 5,610 7,954 7,790 9,490 10,324

EBIT Margin (%) 13% 16% 15% 14% 15% 13% Total liabilities and equity 14,991 13,573 15,173 14,996 16,111 16,975

Net Margin (%) 7% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%

Leverage Cash flow statement ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

Gross Debt/Equity (x) 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 Net income 953 1,696 1,678 1,753 1,716 1,639

Net Debt/Equity (x) 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 Depreciation 711 655 592 593 633 670

Gross Debt/EBITDA (x) 1.6 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 Changes in working capital -531 -264 -101 -427 -184 6

Net Debt/EBITDA (x) 0.9 0.4 0.7 1.0 0.9 0.9 Other 267 141 135 96 -21 -126

Returns Operating cash flow 1,400 2,228 2,304 2,015 2,144 2,189

ROE (%) 18% 31% 25% 22% 20% 17% Capex -492 -851 -992 -1,192 -1,197 -1,215

ROACE (%) 19% 27% 23% 18% 17% 13% Acquisitions -939 - -282 -29 - -

ROA (%) 7% 12% 12% 12% 11% 10% Other -564 -157 12 -99 - -

Investing cash flow -1,995 -1,008 -1,262 -1,319 -1,197 -1,215

Change in debt 2,145 -401 52 365 -300 -

Dividends -1,314 -950 -591 -1,229 -15 -805

Other -343 -32 -731 -464 -423 -202

Financing cash flow 488 -1,383 -1,270 -1,329 -738 -1,007

Effect of Forex 8 -23 5 15 - -

Increase (decrease) in cash flow -99 -186 -223 -618 209 -33

Russian Oil & Gas 

17

Novatek – Financial and Operational Summary 

Source: Company data, FactSet, BCS  

 

   

Key price assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Market statistics

Crude oil ($/bbl) Share Price ($) 135.00

Brent 80 111 112 108 103 97 Market Cap ($mn) 40,948

Urals 77 109 110 107 102 97 EV ($mn) 44,888

Domestic (Samara) 36 49 50 49 48 47

Gas, domestic Income Statement ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

$/mcm 82 98 99 110 116 118 Revenue 3,911 5,999 6,801 9,612 11,091 11,782

$/mcf 2.3 2.8 2.8 3.1 3.3 3.3 Transportation -1,225 -1,639 -1,960 -3,317 -3,357 -3,624

Taxes other than income tax -332 -597 -543 -686 -1,088 -1,281

Macro assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Other operating costs -482 -771 -1,189 -1,567 -2,115 -2,590

USD/RUB 30.36 29.39 31.04 31.81 32.60 32.90 EBITDA 1,872 2,992 3,109 4,042 4,531 4,286

CPI 8.2% 6.0% 6.0% 6.1% 5.0% 5.0% Depreciation 218 316 360 405 475 579

Operating income 1,655 2,676 2,749 3,637 4,056 3,707

Production 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Finance expenses 5 42 -48 -98 -53 -19

Gas (bcm) Other expense/income 23 -266 77 -21 174 270

Yurkharovskoye 24.4 32.0 34.1 36.4 36.8 36.8 Pre-tax income 1,683 2,452 2,778 3,518 4,178 3,958

Other fields 12.8 15.5 16.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 Income taxes -356 -535 -540 -685 -797 -735

Subtotal 37.3 47.5 50.5 52.0 52.3 52.3 Minority interest/other 8 12 1 1 - -

Sibneftegas 5.4 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.5 Net income 1,335 1,929 2,238 2,834 3,380 3,222

Nortgas 2.3 3.0 4.0 Fully diluted EPS ($) 4.40 6.35 7.37 9.33 11.13 10.61

Severenergia 0.6 1.2 1.9 3.5

Total 37.3 52.9 56.5 60.9 62.7 65.2 Balance sheet ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

Cash 333 740 603 212 212 212

Liquids (mmboe) 29.6 33.6 34.6 44.3 47.5 51.7 Inventories 61 52 101 166 190 215

Accounts receivable 282 519 537 904 916 1,009

Reserves (PRMS) Other current assets 286 500 665 516 516 516

1P 2P 1P+2P 3P 1P+2P+3P Total current assets 962 1,811 1,907 1,798 1,834 1,951

Gas (bcm) 2,195 911 3,106 698 3,804 Fixed assets 5,519 4,632 5,306 5,830 7,049 8,709

Liquids (mmbbl) 1,242 801 2,043 1,193 3,236 Other non-current assets 2,801 5,466 7,948 8,052 8,052 8,052

Oil and Gas (bn boe) 15.6 6.8 22.4 5.8 28.1 Total non-current assets 8,320 10,098 13,254 13,883 15,102 16,761

EV/Reserves ($/boe) 2.9 2.0 1.6 Total assets 9,282 11,909 15,161 15,680 16,936 18,712

Reserve life (years) 35 51 64 Short-term debt 819 630 1,135 0 33 73

Accounts payable 927 774 521 588 673 760

Financial ratios 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Other current liabilities 124 152 148 144 164 186

Valuation Total current liabilities 1,870 1,557 1,805 732 870 1,019

P/E (x) 30.7 21.2 18.3 14.4 12.1 12.7 Long-term debt 1,532 2,335 3,202 3,346 2,141 1,504

PEG (x) 49.0 47.7 114.4 54.2 62.8 NM Other non-current liabilities 1,092 532 660 681 681 681

P/B (x) 9.6 6.7 4.8 4.0 3.4 2.8 Total non-current liabilities 2,624 2,867 3,861 4,028 2,823 2,185

EV/EBITDA (x) 24.0 15.0 14.4 11.1 9.9 10.5 Total shareholders' equity 4,789 7,486 9,495 10,921 13,243 15,508

EV/DACF (x) 27.0 17.1 16.6 12.5 11.4 11.6 Total liabilities and equity 9,282 11,909 15,161 15,680 16,936 18,712

Dividend yield (%) 1.0% 1.5% 1.6% 2.1% 2.5% 2.4%

FCF Yield (%) 1.7% 3.6% 2.8% 3.4% 5.1% 3.2% Cash flow statement ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

Profitability Net income 1,335 1,929 2,238 2,834 3,380 3,222

EBITDA Margin (%) 48% 50% 46% 42% 41% 36% Depreciation 218 316 360 405 475 579

EBIT Margin (%) 42% 45% 40% 38% 37% 31% Changes in working capital -139 -155 -165 -390 69 -9

Net Margin (%) 34% 32% 33% 29% 30% 27% Other 63 356 10 236 - -

Leverage Operating cash flow 1,478 2,446 2,443 3,085 3,924 3,793

Gross Debt/Equity (x) 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 Capex -772 -981 -1,291 -1,548 -1,694 -2,239

Net Debt/Equity (x) 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 Other -1,511 -722 -1,475 284 - -

Gross Debt/EBITDA (x) 1.3 1.0 1.4 0.8 0.5 0.4 Investing cash flow -2,283 -1,702 -2,766 -1,832 -1,694 -2,239

Net Debt/EBITDA (x) 1.1 0.7 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.3 Change in debt 1,100 637 1,312 -900 -1,172 -597

Net Interest Cover (x) NM NM 56.7 37.3 76.7 191.1 Dividends -325 -516 -635 -704 -1,058 -957

Returns Other -8 -460 500 113 - -

ROE (%) 31% 31% 26% 28% 28% 22% Financing cash flow 766 -339 177 -1,716 -2,230 -1,554

ROACE (%) 21% 25% 19% 21% 22% 18% Effect of Forex -3 2 -63 71 - -

ROA (%) 17% 18% 17% 18% 21% 18% Increase (decrease) in cash flow -42 407 -210 -391 0 0

Russian Oil & Gas 

18

Rosneft – Financial and Operational Summary 

Source: Company data, FactSet, BCS 

 

 

   

Key price assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Market statistics

Crude oil ($/bbl) Share Price ($) 8.08

Brent 80 111 112 108 103 97 Market Cap ($mn) 85,632

Urals 77 109 110 107 102 97 EV ($mn) 145,890

Domestic (Samara) 36 49 50 49 48 47

Crack spreads ($/bbl) Income Statement ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

Gasoline 16 17 23 21 20 21 Revenue 63,208 92,465 99,161 140,815 148,616 144,668

Diesel 12 17 19 18 16 16 Opex -4,743 -6,430 -7,088 -12,240 -14,125 -14,512

Jet fuel 15 22 23 22 21 21 Purchased oil -2,372 -10,138 -11,952 -11,068 -9,986 -9,547

Fuel oil -21 -30 -26 -32 -30 -26 Taxes other than income tax -10,903 -16,942 -20,779 -32,230 -35,062 -35,415

Gas, domestic Excise and export duties -16,765 -26,875 -29,027 -42,270 -44,159 -42,567

$/mcm 82 98 99 110 116 118 Other operating costs -9,124 -9,560 -10,696 -16,043 -17,605 -18,100

$/mcf 2.3 2.8 2.8 3.1 3.3 3.3 EBITDA 19,302 22,521 19,620 26,964 27,680 24,528

Depreciation 6,653 7,246 7,313 10,654 11,712 12,528

Macro assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Operating income 12,648 15,275 12,307 16,311 15,969 11,999

USD/RUB 30.36 29.39 31.04 31.81 32.60 32.90 Finance expenses -33 34 290 -1,901 -2,546 -2,711

CPI 8.2% 6.0% 6.0% 6.1% 5.0% 5.0% Other expense/income -791 -1,531 1,482 -948 -561 -602

Pre-tax income 11,825 13,778 14,078 13,462 12,862 8,686

Production 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Income taxes -1,910 -2,926 -3,061 -2,474 -2,572 -1,737

Crude oil Minority interest/other -264 -102 -32 0 0 0

annual output (mmt) 114 119 122 191 213 214 Net income 9,651 10,750 10,986 10,988 10,290 6,949

daily output (kbd) 2,276 2,375 2,439 3,812 4,254 4,276 Fully diluted EPS ($) 1.01 1.12 1.17 1.11 0.97 0.66

Refined products

annual output (mmt) 48 48 48 72 81 81 Balance sheet ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

daily output (kbd) 958 962 967 1,432 1,610 1,610 Cash 4,134 5,156 9,788 10,578 10,578 10,578

light product yield 57% 58% 58% 55% 55% 65% Inventories 2,116 3,914 4,387 5,866 5,642 5,754

Gas (bcm) 12.3 12.8 16.4 34.8 40.3 47.6 Accounts receivable 5,045 6,740 7,758 10,962 10,436 10,426

Other current assets 11,360 9,504 8,839 13,116 13,116 13,116

Reserves (PRMS) Total current assets 22,654 25,314 30,771 40,522 39,772 39,874

1P 2P 1P+2P 3P 1P+2P+3P Fixed assets 66,758 69,294 86,356 150,043 161,842 170,491

Oil (bn bbl) 18.3 9.8 28.2 8.9 37.1 Other non-current assets 8,723 10,281 13,291 25,100 25,100 25,100

Gas (bcm) 992 372 1,363 262 1,625 Total non-current assets 75,481 79,575 99,646 175,143 186,942 195,591

Total (bn boe) 24.2 12.0 36.2 10.4 46.6 Total assets 98,135 104,888 130,418 215,665 226,714 235,464

EV/Reserves ($/boe) 6.0 4.0 3.1 Short-term debt 5,436 4,721 4,681 18,357 22,350 26,482

Reserve life (years) 13 20 26 Accounts payable 3,678 5,622 6,973 12,742 12,255 12,497

Other current liabilities 2,344 2,516 3,241 5,503 5,503 5,503

Financial ratios 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Total current liabilities 11,457 12,859 14,895 36,602 40,109 44,482

Valuation Long-term debt 17,869 18,512 27,400 57,415 57,415 57,415

P/E (x) 8.9 8.0 7.8 7.8 8.3 12.3 Other non-current liabilities 11,555 10,312 13,389 36,595 36,595 36,595

PEG (x) 18.4 NM NM NM NM NM Total non-current liabilities 29,424 28,823 40,788 94,011 94,011 94,011

P/B (x) 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 Total shareholders' equity 57,254 63,206 74,735 85,052 92,594 96,971

EV/EBITDA (x) 7.6 6.5 7.4 5.4 5.3 5.9 Total liabilities and equity 98,135 104,888 130,418 215,665 226,714 235,464

EV/DACF (x) 9.0 6.8 7.4 5.7 6.1 6.7

Dividend yield (%) 1.1% 3.0% 3.2% 3.2% 3.0% 2.0% Cash flow statement ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

FCF Yield (%) 8.8% 9.5% 5.8% 11.2% 1.4% 1.3% Net income 9,914 10,852 11,018 10,988 10,290 6,949

Profitability Depreciation 6,653 7,246 7,313 10,654 11,712 12,528

EBITDA Margin (%) 31% 24% 20% 19% 19% 17% Changes in working capital -494 -2,654 966 6,833 264 140

EBIT Margin (%) 20% 17% 12% 12% 11% 8% Other -329 3,300 1,675 2,322 - -

Net Margin (%) 15% 12% 11% 8% 7% 5% Operating cash flow 15,744 18,745 20,973 30,797 22,265 19,618

Leverage Capex -8,696 -13,302 -15,013 -20,977 -23,511 -21,177

Gross Debt/Equity (x) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.9 0.9 Acquisitions -3,162 987 -193 -4,041 - -

Net Debt/Equity (x) 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.7 Other -626 -1,157 838 3 - -

Gross Debt/EBITDA (x) 1.2 1.0 1.6 2.8 2.9 3.4 Investing cash flow -12,484 -13,472 -14,368 -25,016 -23,511 -21,177

Net Debt/EBITDA (x) 0.6 0.6 1.0 2.2 2.3 2.8 Change in debt 296 306 7,893 37,936 3,993 4,132

Net Interest Cover (x) 384.0 NM NM 8.6 6.3 4.4 Dividends -725 -919 -2,287 -2,403 -2,747 -2,572

Returns Other -696 -3,707 -7,288 -40,943 - -

ROE (%) 19% 18% 16% 14% 12% 7% Financing cash flow -1,124 -4,319 -1,682 -5,410 1,246 1,559

ROACE (%) 15% 16% 10% 9% 8% 6% Effect of Forex 0 68 -290 418 - -

ROA (%) 11% 11% 9% 6% 5% 3% Increase (decrease) in cash flow 2,137 1,022 4,632 790 0 0

Russian Oil & Gas 

19

Gazprom – Financial and Operational Summary 

Source: Company data, FactSet, BCS 

 

 

   

Key price assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Market statistics

Gas ($/mcm) Share Price ($) 9.08

Domestic 76 90 93 100 106 108 Market Cap ($mn) 104,182

Europe 302 383 385 377 362 343 EV ($mn) 144,472

FSU 232 290 305 304 291 280

Crude oil ($/bbl) Income Statement ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

Brent 80 111 112 108 103 97 Revenue 118,912 157,494 153,761 154,655 152,410 150,232

Urals 77 109 110 107 102 97 Transportation -9,021 -9,539 -10,318 -11,465 -12,309 -12,746

Domestic (Samara) 36 49 50 49 48 47 Taxes other than income tax -9,617 -14,244 -18,672 -20,436 -22,835 -23,848

Other operating costs -55,226 -68,137 -72,413 -66,753 -65,112 -64,117

Macro assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e EBITDA 45,047 65,574 52,358 56,001 52,156 49,521

USD/RUB 30.36 29.39 31.04 31.81 32.60 32.90 Depreciation 8,243 9,365 10,767 13,827 15,352 16,881

CPI 8.2% 6.0% 6.0% 6.1% 5.0% 5.0% Operating income 36,804 56,209 41,591 42,175 36,804 32,640

Finance expenses -595 -441 -348 -47 -58 -156

Production 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Other expense/income 5,960 1,203 7,572 23 2,997 2,979

Natural gas (bcm) 509 510 481 481 488 499 Pre-tax income 42,168 56,971 48,815 42,150 39,743 35,463

Liquids (mmboe) 43 46 48 47 50 50 Income taxes -8,222 -9,473 -8,933 -5,429 -7,949 -7,093

Minority interest/other -1,878 -3,142 -1,702 -3,770 -607 -542

Gas deliveries 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Net income 32,068 44,356 38,180 32,952 31,187 27,828

Domestic (bcm) 277 281 265 255 249 252 Fully diluted EPS ($) 2.79 3.87 3.33 2.87 2.72 2.43

FSU (bcm) 70 82 66 58 61 62

Non-FSU (bcm) 148 157 151 160 162 165 Balance sheet ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

Cash 14,347 15,572 13,734 18,431 18,431 18,431

Domestic market share 67% 70% 67% 65% 63% 63% Inventories 10,602 12,658 15,043 12,663 12,844 12,837

European market share 23% 27% 25% 28% 28% 29% Accounts receivable 24,669 24,352 30,775 27,453 28,058 27,913

Other current assets 11,115 17,001 19,300 18,719 18,719 18,719

Reserves (PRMS) Total current assets 60,733 69,583 78,851 77,266 78,051 77,899

1P 2P 1P+2P Fixed assets 178,578 208,677 255,938 279,378 308,917 336,927

Gas (bcm) 19,100 4,300 23,400 Other non-current assets 61,312 60,313 60,266 51,653 51,653 51,653

Liquids (mmbbl) 10,599 5,310 15,909 Total non-current assets 239,889 268,989 316,204 331,031 360,570 388,580

Oil and Gas (bn boe) 135.5 33.4 168.9 Total assets 300,623 338,572 395,055 408,296 438,621 466,479

EV/Reserves ($/boe) 1.1 0.9 Short-term debt 6,212 11,395 10,698 11,026 14,120 21,420

Reserve life (years) 44 55 Accounts payable 26,697 29,270 38,072 26,493 26,871 26,856

Other current liabilities 7 - - - - -

Financial ratios 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Total current liabilities 32,916 40,665 48,770 37,519 40,992 48,276

Valuation Long-term debt 36,598 36,442 38,560 40,188 40,188 40,188

P/E (x) 3.2 2.3 2.7 3.2 3.3 3.7 Other non-current liabilities 18,357 20,411 22,892 29,233 29,233 29,233

PEG (x) 11.1 6.1 NM NM NM NM Total non-current liabilities 54,955 56,853 61,452 69,421 69,421 69,421

P/B (x) 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 Minority interest 9,329 9,238 10,127 9,970 10,577 11,119

EV/EBITDA (x) 3.2 2.2 2.8 2.6 2.8 2.9 Total shareholders' equity 203,423 231,816 274,706 291,387 317,632 337,663

EV/DACF (x) 3.6 2.5 3.2 2.9 3.1 3.2 Total liabilities and equity 300,623 338,572 395,055 408,296 438,621 466,479

Dividend yield (%) 2.8% 6.9% 4.5% 4.7% 7.5% 6.7%

FCF Yield (%) 11.4% 0.8% 1.1% 4.0% -0.5% -1.7% Cash flow statement ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

Profitability Net income 32,068 44,356 38,180 32,952 31,187 27,828

EBITDA Margin (%) 38% 42% 34% 36% 34% 33% Depreciation 8,243 9,365 10,767 13,827 15,352 16,881

EBIT Margin (%) 31% 36% 27% 27% 24% 22% Changes in working capital 8,356 -1,099 1,054 1,537 -407 137

Net Margin (%) 27% 28% 25% 21% 20% 19% Other -375 2,634 -3,411 3,562 607 542

Leverage Operating cash flow 48,293 55,256 46,590 51,877 46,739 45,389

Gross Debt/Equity (x) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Capex -36,393 -54,404 -45,418 -45,499 -44,891 -44,891

Net Debt/Equity (x) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Other 1,784 208 4,473 761.51 - -

Gross Debt/EBITDA (x) 1.0 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 Investing cash flow -34,609 -54,196 -40,945 -44,738 -44,891 -44,891

Net Debt/EBITDA (x) 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.9 Change in debt -7,013 10,435 -1,935 4,037 3,095 7,299

Net Interest Cover (x) 61.8 127.5 119.7 895.5 639.5 209.1 Dividends -1,808 -3,211 -6,158 -4,722 -4,943 -7,797

Returns Other 1,844 -6,382 49 -1,476 - -

ROE (%) 17% 20% 15% 12% 10% 8% Financing cash flow -6,977 841 -8,044 -2,162 -1,848 -497

ROACE (%) 13% 19% 12% 11% 9% 7% Effect of Forex -619 -677 561 -280 - -

ROA (%) 11% 14% 10% 8% 7% 6% Increase (decrease) in cash flow 6,088 1,224 -1,838 4,697 (0) 0

Russian Oil & Gas 

20

Surgutneftegas – Financial and Operational Summary 

Source: Company data, FactSet, BCS 

 

    

Key price assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Market statistics

Crude oil ($/bbl) Share Price (ordinary) ($) 8.61

Brent 80 111 112 108 103 97 Share Price (preferred) ($) 0.73

Urals 77 109 110 107 102 97 Market Cap ($mn) 30,760

Domestic (Samara) 36 49 50 49 48 47 EV ($mn) 4,677

Crack spreads ($/bbl)

Gasoline 16 17 23 21 20 21 Income Statement ($mn) 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

Diesel 12 17 19 18 16 16 Revenue 41,148 42,118 40,597 38,900 36,589

Jet fuel 15 22 23 22 21 21 Opex -8,532 -9,381 -8,601 -8,593 -8,539

Fuel oil -21 -30 -26 -32 -30 -26 Taxes other than income tax -8,458 -8,959 -8,790 -8,516 -8,111

Gas, domestic Excise and export duties -14,096 -14,748 -15,097 -13,675 -12,858

$/mcm 82 98 99 110 116 118 Other operating costs -32 -78 -75 -77 -80

$/mcf 2.3 2.8 2.8 3.1 3.3 3.3 EBITDA 10,030 8,953 8,034 8,040 7,002

Depreciation -1,372 -1,525 -1,760 -2,021 -2,342

Macro assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Operating income 8,658 7,428 6,274 6,019 4,659

USD/RUB 30.36 29.39 31.04 31.81 32.60 32.90 Finance expenses 985 1,420 1,539 1,529 1,497

CPI 8.2% 6.0% 6.0% 6.1% 5.0% 5.0% Other expense/income 2,051 -1,641 2,208 279 272

Pre-tax income 11,695 7,206 10,021 7,827 6,429

Production 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Income taxes -2,340 -1,403 -1,851 -1,565 -1,286

Crude oil Net income 9,355 5,803 8,169 6,262 5,143

annual output (mmt) 59 61 61 61 61 60 Fully diluted EPS ($) 2.62 1.62 2.29 1.75 1.44

daily output (kbd) 1,187 1,216 1,225 1,222 1,221 1,200

Refined products Balance sheet ($mn) 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

annual output (mmt) 20 20 20 19 20 20 Cash and investments 12,416 12,085 7,471 7,055 6,176

daily output (kbd) 406 406 395 378 392 392 Inventories 1,388 1,720 1,705 1,639 1,618

light product yield 41% 40% 41% 45% 56% 56% Accounts receivable 2,557 2,610 2,516 2,393 2,287

Gas (bcm) 13.9 13.2 12.4 12.3 12.3 12.1 Other current assets 1,384 1,556 1,147 1,147 1,147

Total current assets 17,744 17,971 12,839 12,235 11,228

Reserves (PRMS) Fixed assets 25,162 30,132 33,136 38,786 44,024

1P Other non-current assets 15,984 19,690 24,221 24,221 24,221

Oil (bn bbl) 6.7 Total non-current assets 41,146 49,823 57,357 63,007 68,244

Gas (bcm) 334 Total assets 58,891 67,794 70,197 75,241 79,473

Total (bn boe) 8.8 Short-term debt - - - - -

EV/Reserves ($/bbl) 0.5 Accounts payable 1,061 1,201 1,191 1,145 1,130

Reserve life (years) 17 Other current liabilities 2,124 2,011 2,096 2,096 2,096

Total current liabilities 3,185 3,212 3,287 3,240 3,226

Financial ratios 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Long-term debt - - - - -

Valuation Other non-current liabilities 3,805 5,227 5,431 5,431 5,431

P/E (x) 3.3 5.3 3.8 4.9 6.0 Total non-current liabilities 3,805 5,227 5,431 5,431 5,431

PEG (x) NM 9.2 NM NM Total shareholders' equity 51,901 59,355 61,479 66,570 70,816

P/B (x) 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 Total liabilities and equity 58,891 67,794 70,197 75,241 79,473

EV/EBITDA (x) 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7

EV/DACF (x) 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Cash flow statement ($mn) 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

Dividend yield (ordinary) (%) 1.9% 2.4% 1.9% 2.1% 1.6% 1.3% Net income 9,355 5,803 8,169 6,262 5,143

Dividend yield (preferred) (%) 5.3% 10.0% 6.5% 9.2% 7.1% 5.8% Depreciation 1,372 1,525 1,760 2,021 2,342

FCF Yield (%) 10.4% 11.3% -3.4% -2.2% -4.5% Changes in working capital -692 -38 -895 143 112

Profitability Other -1,873 729 -2,097 - (0.00)

EBITDA Margin (%) 24% 21% 20% 21% 19% Operating cash flow 8,161 8,019 6,937 8,425 7,598

EBIT Margin (%) 21% 18% 15% 15% 13% Capex -4,285 -4,501 -6,917 -7,670 -7,580

Net Margin (%) 23% 14% 20% 16% 14% Other -2,997 -1,734 -799 - -

Returns Investing cash flow -7,282 -6,234 -7,716 -7,670 -7,580

ROE (%) 18% 10% 14% 10% 7% Change in debt - - - - -

ROACE (%) 27% 22% 17% 14% 9% Dividends -924 -1,217 -943 -1,171 -897

ROA (%) 16% 9% 12% 9% 7% Other -173 235 33 - -

Financing cash flow -1,096 -981 -910 -1,171 -897

Effect of Forex 13 -53 13 - -

Increase (decrease) in cash flow -204 751 -1,676 -415 -879

Russian Oil & Gas 

21

Tatneft – Financial and Operational Summary 

Source: Company data, FactSet, BCS 

 

 

   

Key price assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Market statistics

Crude oil ($/bbl) Share Price (ords) ($/GDR) 38.99

Brent 80 111 112 108 103 97 Share Price (prefs) ($/share) 3.51

Urals 77 109 110 107 102 97 Market Cap ($mn) 13,775

Domestic (Samara) 36 49 50 49 48 47 EV ($mn) 15,740

Crack spreads ($/bbl)

Gasoline 16 17 23 21 20 21 Income Statement ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

Diesel 12 17 19 18 16 16 Revenue 10,697 14,196 14,299 13,914 13,965 13,382

Jet fuel 15 22 23 22 21 21 Opex -2,211 -2,683 -2,786 -2,686 -2,876 -2,900

Fuel oil -21 -30 -26 -32 -30 -26 Purchased oil -1,831 -2,513 -1,735 -1,610 -1,509 -1,461

Gas, domestic Taxes other than income tax -2,398 -3,424 -3,424 -3,543 -3,515 -3,456

$/mcm 82 98 99 110 116 118 Other operating costs -1,730 -2,085 -2,503 -2,520 -2,559 -2,555

EBITDA 2,528 3,491 3,850 3,555 3,506 3,010

Macro assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Depreciation 411 406 572 604 660 723

USD/RUB 30.36 29.39 31.04 31.81 32.60 32.90 Operating income 2,117 3,084 3,279 2,951 2,845 2,287

CPI 8.2% 6.0% 6.0% 6.1% 5.0% 5.0% Finance expenses 108 58 -100 -46 13 37

Other expense/income -90 -213 107 -9 -6 -6

Production 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Pre-tax income 2,135 2,930 3,286 2,896 2,852 2,318

Crude oil Income taxes -458 -749 -754 -614 -570 -464

annual output (mmt) 26 26 26 26 26 26 Minority interest/dividends -132 -87 -160 -135 -135 -133

daily output (kbd) 522 524 525 526 526 516 Net income 1,545 2,094 2,372 2,148 2,146 1,721

Refined products Fully diluted EPS ($) 4.38 5.94 6.73 6.09 6.09 4.88

annual output (mmt) 0.5 2.3 7.2 7.3 7.1 7.1

daily output (kbd) 10 45 143 145 142 142 Balance sheet ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

light product yield 35% 30% 30% 36% 54% 54% Cash 263 529 428 1,024 1,507 1,922

Gas (bcm) 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 Inventories 493 784 936 1,034 941 953

Accounts receivable 2,272 2,350 1,753 1,724 1,668 1,631

Reserves (PRMS) Other current assets 1,287 1,169 1,477 1,276 1,541 1,522

1P 2P 1P+2P 3P 1P+2P+3P Total current assets 4,315 4,833 4,594 5,057 5,657 6,028

Oil (bn bbl) 6.2 2.2 8.4 0.2 8.6 Fixed assets 12,817 13,380 14,695 14,896 16,370 17,796

Gas (bcm) 35 13 47 0 48 Other non-current assets 1,329 1,287 1,354 1,212 1,212 1,212

Total (bn boe) 6.4 2.3 8.7 0.2 8.9 Total non-current assets 14,147 14,667 16,049 16,108 17,582 19,008

EV/Reserves ($/boe) 2.5 1.8 1.8 Total assets 18,461 19,500 20,643 21,165 23,239 25,036

Reserve life (years) 32 44 45 Short-term debt 1,118 1,265 1,051 1,251 1,251 1,251

Accounts payable 1,513 1,750 1,455 2,177 2,052 2,070

Financial ratios 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Other current liabilities 1 - - - - -

Valuation Total current liabilities 2,631 3,015 2,506 3,428 3,303 3,321

P/E (x) 8.9 6.6 5.8 6.4 6.4 8.0 Long-term debt 2,442 1,919 1,244 885 1,385 1,777

PEG (x) NM 18.5 43.8 NM NM NM Other non-current liabilities 2,367 2,479 2,819 2,781 2,917 3,050

P/B (x) 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 Total non-current liabilities 4,809 4,398 4,063 3,666 4,302 4,827

EV/EBITDA (x) 6.2 4.5 4.1 4.4 4.5 5.2 Total shareholders' equity 11,021 12,087 14,075 14,071 15,634 16,888

EV/DACF (x) 8.0 6.1 4.6 5.4 5.3 6.2 Total liabilities and equity 18,461 19,500 20,643 21,165 23,239 25,036

Dividend yield (ords) (%) 2.5% 3.8% 4.4% 4.0% 4.0% 3.2%

Dividend yield (prefs) (%) 4.7% 6.9% 7.9% 7.3% 7.3% 5.9% Cash flow statement ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

FCF Yield (%) NM 6.5% 12.1% 6.7% 5.9% 3.1% Net income 1,545 2,094 2,372 2,148 2,146 1,721

Profitability Depreciation 411 406 572 604 660 723

EBITDA Margin (%) 24% 25% 27% 26% 25% 22% Changes in working capital -153 173 -330 509 -242 63

EBIT Margin (%) 20% 22% 23% 21% 20% 17% Other 38 70 306 69 135 133

Net Margin (%) 14% 15% 17% 15% 15% 13% Operating cash flow 1,840 2,744 2,920 3,330 2,701 2,640

Leverage Capex -2,543 -1,674 -1,578 -1,899 -2,134 -2,149

Gross Debt/Equity (x) 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Acquisitions -3 24 -12 11 - -

Net Debt/Equity (x) 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Other 400 38 28 -87 - -

Gross Debt/EBITDA (x) 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.0 Investing cash flow -2,145 -1,612 -1,563 -1,975 -2,134 -2,149

Net Debt/EBITDA (x) 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 Change in debt 654 -428 -940 -109 500 392

Returns Dividends -492 -388 -518 -607 -583 -468

ROE (%) 15% 18% 18% 15% 14% 11% Other -18 -50 0 -44 - -

ROACE (%) 12% 16% 16% 15% 14% 11% Financing cash flow 143 -865 -1,458 -760 -83 -76

ROA (%) 9% 11% 12% 10% 10% 7% Increase (decrease) in cash flow -162 266 -101 595 483 415

Russian Oil & Gas 

22

Alliance Oil – Financial and Operational Summary 

Source: Company data, FactSet, BCS 

 

 

   

Key price assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Market statistics

Crude oil ($/bbl) Share Price (common) (SEK/share) 52.95

Brent 80 111 112 108 103 97 Share Price (preferred) (SEK/share) 300.00 A

Urals 77 109 110 107 102 97 Market Cap ($mn) 1,414

Domestic (Samara) 36 49 50 49 48 47 EV ($mn) 3,734

Crack spreads ($/bbl)

Gasoline 16 17 23 21 20 21 Income Statement ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

Diesel 12 17 19 18 16 16 Revenue 2,196 3,083 3,445 3,627 3,716 3,749

Jet fuel 15 22 23 22 21 21 Opex -135 -193 -197 -235 -232 -237

Fuel oil -21 -30 -26 -32 -30 -26 Purchased oil -656 -929 -1,141 -1,241 -1,333 -1,254

Gas, domestic Taxes other than income tax -251 -360 -385 -329 -272 -274

$/mcm 82 98 99 110 116 118 Other operating costs -714 -913 -935 -1,151 -1,038 -1,040

$/mcf 2.3 2.8 2.8 3.1 3.3 3.3 EBITDA 440 687 787 671 840 945

Depreciation 132 174 192 240 255 262

Macro assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Operating income 307 513 595 431 585 682

USD/RUB 30.36 29.39 31.04 31.81 32.60 32.90 Finance expenses -22 -47 -80 -112 -118 -106

CPI 8.2% 6.0% 6.0% 6.1% 5.0% 5.0% Other expense/income 4 -34 29 -8 8 7

Pre-tax income 290 433 544 311 476 583

Production 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Income taxes -63 -104 -124 -77 -95 -117

Crude oil Minority interest/dividends -4 - -18 -52 -60 -56

annual output (mn tonnes) 2.2 2.4 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.9 Net income 222 328 403 182 321 410

daily output (kbd) 44 49 54 54 54 58 Fully diluted EPS ($) 1.30 1.91 2.35 1.06 1.87 2.39

Gas

annual output (mmcm) 611 837 837 Balance sheet ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

daily output (kboed) 11 15 15 Cash 178 188 412 398 398 398

Refined products Inventories 141 145 228 223 204 198

annual output (mn tonnes) 3.1 3.5 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.5 Accounts receivable 215 240 278 366 369 365

daily output (kbd) 62 70 75 83 91 91 Other current assets 195 330 360 290 290 290

light product yield 60% 58% 53% 50% 57% 63% Total current assets 730 902 1,277 1,278 1,261 1,251

Fixed assets 2,528 3,224 4,475 4,717 4,950 5,026

Reserves (PRMS) Other non-current assets 89 99 240 238 238 238

1P 2P 1P+2P 3P 1P+2P+3P Total non-current assets 2,618 3,323 4,715 4,955 5,188 5,264

Oil (bn bbl) 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.5 1.2 Total assets 3,347 4,225 5,992 6,233 6,450 6,515

EV/Reserves ($/bbl) 11.3 5.1 3.1 Short-term debt 127 107 402 610 517 162

Reserve life (years) 14 31 51 Accounts payable 309 393 509 439 401 389

Other current liabilities - - 6 9 9 9

Financial ratios 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Total current liabilities 436 500 917 1,058 927 560

Valuation Long-term debt 912 1,514 1,669 1,775 1,775 1,775

P/E (x) 6.4 4.3 3.5 7.8 4.4 3.4 Other non-current liabilities 194 217 373 338 338 338

PEG (x) NM 9.0 15.5 NM 5.8 12.4 Total non-current liabilities 1,106 1,731 2,042 2,113 2,113 2,113

P/B (x) 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 Total shareholders' equity 1,805 1,993 3,033 3,062 3,409 3,842

EV/EBITDA (x) 8.5 5.4 4.7 5.6 4.4 4.0 Total liabilities and equity 3,347 4,225 5,992 6,233 6,450 6,515

EV/DACF (x) 9.4 6.0 4.2 6.2 5.1 4.6

FCF Yield (%) NM NM NM NM 15.1% 33.1% Cash flow statement ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

Profitability Profit before tax 307 433 544 311 476 583

EBITDA Margin (%) 20% 22% 23% 18% 23% 25% Depreciation 132 174 192 240 255 262

EBIT Margin (%) 14% 17% 17% 12% 16% 18% Changes in working capital -176 -118 -245 -74 -21 -2

Net Margin (%) 10% 11% 12% 5% 9% 11% Other -60 -26 78 -34 -95 -117

Leverage Operating cash flow 204 463 570 443 615 727

Gross Debt/Equity (x) 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.5 Capex -605 -1,020 -729 -761 -488 -338

Net Debt/Equity (x) 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.4 Acquisitions - -1 - - - -

Gross Debt/EBITDA (x) 2.4 2.4 2.6 3.6 2.7 2.1 Other -105 -50 -234 -6 - -

Net Debt/EBITDA (x) 2.0 2.1 2.1 3.0 2.3 1.6 Investing cash flow -709 -1,071 -963 -768 -488 -338

Returns Change in debt 306 632 291 362 -93 -355

ROE (%) 12% 17% 16% 6% 10% 11% Dividends 0 - - -28 -34 -34

ROACE (%) 11% 13% 12% 7% 9% 10% Other - -2 317 4 - -

ROA (%) 7% 9% 8% 3% 5% 6% Financing cash flow 306 631 608 337 -127 -389

FX effects -15 -13 9 -26 - -

Increase (decrease) in cash flow -214 10 224 -14 0 0

Russian Oil & Gas 

23

Transneft – Financial and Operational Summary 

Source: Company data, FactSet, BCS 

 

 

   

Market statistics Income Statement ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

Share Price (Rb/share) 83,786 Revenue 14,741 22,802 23,594 23,886 23,741 24,280

Opex -5,651 -6,536 -6,428 -5,929 -6,258 -6,543

Macro assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Cost of oil sold -252 -2,843 -2,905 -2,865 -2,850 -2,828

USD/RUB 30.36 29.39 31.04 31.81 32.60 32.90 Export custom duties -2,276 -2,433 -2,339 -2,172 -1,970

CPI 8.2% 6.0% 6.0% 6.1% 5.0% 5.0% Other operating costs -969 -1,242 -1,391 -1,577 -1,564 -1,552

Tariff growth 11.8% 22.5% 1.5% 7.0% 0.0% 5.0% EBITDA 7,869 9,906 10,438 11,177 10,896 11,387

Depreciation 2,371 2,680 2,712 3,230 3,409 3,584

Production (mt) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Operating income 5,498 7,227 7,725 7,947 7,487 7,803

Crude oil Finance expenses -465 -414 -633 -713 -588 -411

Domestic 226 233 242 242 242 242 Other expense/income 155 1,200 467 -119 -53 -42

Exports/transit 240 238 239 239 241 241 Pre-tax income 5,188 8,013 7,559 7,115 6,847 7,350

Total 466 472 480 481 483 483 Income taxes -1,074 -1,507 -1,619 -1,434 -1,369 -1,470

% of Russian output 92% 92% 93% 92% 92% 92% Minority interest/dividends -207 -106 -125 -155 0 0

Pipeline length ('000 km) 50 51 54 54 54 54 Net income 3,907 6,399 5,815 5,526 5,477 5,880

Refined products Fully diluted EPS ($) 550 901 819 778 771 828

Domestic 9 9 9 10 10 10

Exports/transit 22 21 19 21 21 21 Balance sheet ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

Total 30 29 27 31 31 31 Cash 9,239 4,521 2,767 3,456 3,456 3,456

% of Russian output 16% 16% 14% 16% 16% 16% Inventories 562 699 839 960 861 878

Accounts receivable 863 1,127 1,303 1,340 1,306 1,343

Financial ratios 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e Other current assets 2,848 7,409 10,204 10,669 10,669 10,669

Valuation Total current assets 13,513 13,756 15,113 16,424 16,292 16,345

P/E (x) 4.6 2.8 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.1 Fixed assets 39,526 41,729 47,602 47,652 50,404 52,479

PEG (x) NM 4.4 NM NM NM 41.8 Other non-current assets 720 2,230 2,658 2,785 2,785 2,785

P/B (x) 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 Total non-current assets 40,246 43,959 50,260 50,437 53,188 55,264

EV/EBITDA (x) 4.4 3.5 3.3 3.1 3.2 3.1 Total assets 53,759 57,715 65,372 66,861 69,480 71,610

Dividend yield (prefs) (%) 0.4% 0.9% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.9% Short-term debt 347 1,658 836 1,687 0 0

FCF Yield (%) NM NM 3.5% 20.0% 16.3% 20.4% Accounts payable 3,189 3,864 4,139 4,007 4,249 4,334

Profitability Other current liabilities 83 84 5 18 18 18

EBITDA Margin (%) 53% 43% 44% 47% 46% 47% Total current liabilities 3,618 5,606 4,980 5,713 4,267 4,352

EBIT Margin (%) 37% 32% 33% 33% 32% 32% Long-term debt 18,655 17,143 17,811 16,181 15,065 11,529

Net Margin (%) 27% 28% 25% 23% 23% 24% Other non-current liabilities 6,336 5,166 5,398 5,151 5,151 5,151

Leverage Total non-current liabilities 24,992 22,309 23,210 21,333 20,217 16,680

Gross Debt/Equity (x) 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 Total shareholders' equity 25,149 29,801 37,183 39,816 45,144 50,877

Net Debt/Equity (x) 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 Total liabilities and equity 53,759 57,715 65,372 66,861 69,628 71,909

Gross Debt/EBITDA (x) 2.4 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.0

Net Debt/EBITDA (x) 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.7 Cash flow statement ($mn) 2010 2011 2012 2013e 2014e 2015e

Returns Net income 3,907 6,399 5,815 5,526 5,477 5,880

ROE (%) 17% 23% 17% 14% 13% 12% Depreciation 2,371 2,680 2,712 3,230 3,409 3,584

ROACE (%) 13% 15% 13% 12% 11% 11% Changes in working capital 658 274 -41 -290 374 32

ROA (%) 8% 11% 9% 8% 8% 8% Other -523 -3,515 -1,510 1,749 -148 -151

Operating cash flow 6,412 5,838 6,978 10,215 9,113 9,344

Capex -7,415 -7,128 -6,346 -6,610 -6,160 -5,660

Other 144 -3,498 -1,897 -2,026 - -

Investing cash flow -7,271 -10,626 -8,243 -8,636 -6,160 -5,660

Change in debt 1,038 -7 -393 -580 -2,803 -3,537

Dividends -47 -40 -89 -157 -149 -148

Other -172 -10 99 -270 - -

Financing cash flow 819 -57 -383 -1,007 -2,952 -3,684

Effect of Forex -101 126 -105 117 - -

Increase (decrease) in cash flow -141 -4,719 -1,754 689 0 0

Russian Oil & Gas 

24

 

Risks to BCS theses 

Buy   

Lukoil (TP $75/GDR)  Production decline in West Siberia accelerates; 

CapEx  to  stabilize production  rises above expectations,  thus putting pressure on investment returns; 

Lower  than  guided  dividend  growth  due  to  insufficient  FCF  and  refusal  to borrow; 

Execution problems (further ramp‐up of Uzbek gas production and Korchagina oil  output)  and/or  project  launch  delay  (Iraqi  West  Qurna‐2,  Caspian Filanovskogo)  implying  lower  than  expected  production,  earnings  and  FCF growth. 

Gazprom Neft (TP $25/GDR)  Overpayment  for  oil  license  transfers  from  Gazprom  (Prirazlomnoye  license 

transfer  is pending; Gazprom  spent over $4bn on  the development and may require compensation for historical costs); 

CapEx  over‐run  (refinery  upgrade,  greenfield  development,  brownfield production decline, Lakhta Center in St. Petersburg); 

Continued production decline in West Siberia despite application of production enhancement technologies and rising CapEx. 

Novatek (TP $145/GDR)  Upward adjustments to the gas and condensate MET formula base rates; 

Decline in refined product margins; 

Yamal  LNG:  execution  risk  /  CapEx  over‐run  /  withdrawal  of  government support. 

Bashneft (TP Rb2,100/share) 

Unsustainable production flow rates at legacy fields; 

Refinery upgrade CapEx over‐run; 

Expensive M&A. 

 

Hold   

Rosneft (TP $8.30/GDR) 

Positive risks   Monetization of $12bn worth of operational  synergies  from  the merger with 

TNK‐BP; 

Share purchase by senior management signaling confidence and commitment 

Successful offshore field exploration results; 

Value‐accretive asset / license / company acquisitions. 

Negative risks   Lack of CapEx discipline; 

Greenfield project CapEx over‐run / launch delay. 

   

Russian Oil & Gas 

25

Gazprom (TP $9/GDR) 

Positive risks   Stated compliance with the 35% IFRS dividend payout requirement, a step that 

the market may take as a signal of improving corporate governance; 

Provision of clearer medium‐term CapEx guidance and adherence  to  the new investment program; 

Clear  targets  for  investment  returns  on  numerous  capital‐intensive  projects, signaling the importance of efficiency and shareholder value creation. 

Negative risks  

Adherence to the current dividend policy  (25% RAS payout) due to significant CapEx requirements; 

Provision of a price discount to Ukraine and acquisition of an ownership stake in Ukrainian GTS; 

Additional gas price discounts to European customers. 

 

Sell   

Alliance Oil (TP SEK 41/share)  Earlier  than  expected  (2H14)  launch  of  upgraded  refinery  and  connection  to 

ESPO; 

Successful exploration in Timan Pechora (West‐Osoveisky block); 

Guidance  for  earlier  start  of  additional  gas  blocks  (South  Khadyryakhinsky, Kargasoksky); 

Value‐accretive M&A. 

Surgutneftegas (TP $8.50/GDR)  Value‐accretive M&A; 

West Siberian production rate stabilization; 

Cash pile ensuring stability in a deteriorating market environment. 

Tatneft (TP $40/GDR)  Better control and efficiency over the investment program; 

Bitumen project achieves a significantly larger scale and profitability; 

Dividend payout rises above 30% RAS. 

Transneft pref (TP Rb75,000/share)  Adoption of  IFRS‐based payout and  introduction of a provision  that dividends 

on preferred shares cannot be less than that on common shares; 

RAS  profit  increase  (e.g.,  through  the  requirement  that  subsidiaries  pay  a certain dividend to their parent company, Kommersant, 25 April); 

Management adopting a significant increase in dividends. 

   

Russian Oil & Gas 

26

 

Valuation methodology 

Buy   

Lukoil  (TP  $75/GDR):  Base  case  price  target  is  derived  from  a  ten‐year  DCF model, assuming a WACC of 10.2% and a zero real terminal growth rate. 

Gazprom  Neft  (TP  $25/GDR):  Base  case  price  target  is  derived  from  a  ten‐year  DCF model, assuming a WACC of 10.1% and a real terminal growth rate of ‐1%. 

Novatek  (TP $145/GDR): Base case price  target  is derived  from a  ten‐year DCF model, assuming a WACC of 10.2% and a real terminal growth rate of 0%. 

Bashneft  (TP  Rb2,100/share):  Base  case  price  target  is  derived  from  a  ten‐year  DCF model, assuming a WACC of 10.7% and a real terminal growth rate of ‐1%. 

Hold   

Rosneft  (TP $8.30/GDR): Base case price  target  is derived  from a  ten‐year DCF model, assuming a WACC of 9.2% and a real terminal growth rate of 1%. 

Surgutneftegas  pref  (TP  Rb24/share):  Base  case  price  target  is  calculated  as  a  15% discount  to  common  share  price  target,  a  ratio  reflecting  a  higher  and more  stable dividend. 

Gazprom  (TP $9/GDR): Base case price  target  is derived  from a  ten‐year DDM model, assuming a cost of equity of 12.6% and a zero real terminal growth rate. 

Sell   

Alliance Oil  (TP SEK 41/share): Base  case price  target  is derived  from a  ten‐year DCF model, assuming a WACC of 10.5% and a real terminal growth rate of ‐2%. 

Surgutneftegas  (TP $8.50/GDR): Base case price  target  is derived  from a  ten‐year DCF model, assuming a WACC of 12.6% and a real terminal growth rate of ‐2%. 

Tatneft  (TP  $40/GDR):  Base  case  price  target  is  derived  from  a  ten‐year DCF model, assuming a WACC of 10.4% and a real terminal growth rate of ‐2%. 

Transneft pref (TP Rb75,000/share): target price is set on blended bear‐case, base‐case and bull‐case valuations  (25%, 50% and 25% weightings, respectively), all derived  from ten‐year  DDM models,  assuming  a  cost  of  equity  of  12.6%  and  a  zero  real  terminal growth  rate.  Bear  case  assumes  no  change  in  dividend  policy.  Bull  case  assumes transition to 35%  IFRS payout  from 2015 and an equal DPS  for preferred and common shares. Base case assumes a gradual transition to 35% IFRS payout by 2017. 

 

Research Department +7 (495) 785 5336

Head of Equity Research

Head of Fixed Income Research

Head of Production

Kirill Chuyko (ext. 4733) [email protected]

Leonid Ignatyev (ext. 4679) [email protected]

Mark S Bradford (ext. 4681) [email protected]

Equity Research

Fixed Income Research

Equity Strategy Kirill Chuyko (ext. 4733) [email protected]

Oil & Gas Timur Salikhov, CFA (ext. 4631) [email protected]

Electric Utilities / Telecoms Igor Goncharov (ext. 4622) [email protected]

Consumer / Retail Anna Kochkina (ext. 4660) [email protected]

Industrials / Transportation Igor Kraevskiy (ext. 7564) [email protected]

Financial Services Olga Naydenova (ext. 4734) [email protected]

Metals & Mining Kirill Chuyko (ext. 4733) [email protected]

Oleg Petropavlovskiy (ext. 4680) [email protected]

Media Mitch Mitchell (ext.7213) [email protected]

Market Analysis Mark S Bradford (ext. 4681) [email protected]

Leonid Ignatyev (ext. 4679) [email protected]

Dmitry Dorofeev (ext. 7166) [email protected]

Maria Radchenko (ext. 4678) [email protected]

Yulia Safarbakova (ext. 7507) [email protected]

Artem Usmanov (ext. 7429) [email protected]

Head of Russian Product Olga Sibiricheva (ext. 4618) [email protected]

Editing/Translation Mitch Mitchell (ext. 7213) [email protected]

Nikolay Porokhov (ext. 7511) [email protected]

Elena Kosovskaya (ext. 7467) [email protected]

Vladlen Garazha (ext. 7301) [email protected]

Technical Specialist Svetlana Fedorovykh (ext. 7334) [email protected]

Institutional Sales & Trading (Moscow) +7 (495) 785 5336 (ext. 4702)

Institutional Sales & Trading (London) +44 (207) 065 2022

Private Client Service +7 (495) 785 7475 (ext. 2123)

This research report is prepared by the Research Department of BrokerCreditService Ltd (hereinafter referred to as the Company) for information purposes only. Neither the information nor any opinion is intended to be, or should be construed as an offer, a recommendation or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any financial instrument. This research constitutes neither investment advice nor tax advice and it does not take into account the specific investment objectives, risk appetite and financial situation of anyone who may receive this report. Investors should seek their own advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any financial instrument or investment strategy discussed or recommended in this report.

Investors should note that any income derived from investments in financial instruments may fluctuate and that the price or value of securities and investments may rise or fall. Accordingly, investors may lose their investment or receive back less than originally invested. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Foreign currency exchange rates may adversely affect the value, price or income of any security or related investment mentioned in this report. In addition, there may be currency risk if investing in securities such as ADRs or GDRs. Investing in the Russian economy and Russian securities involves a high degree of risk and requires appropriate knowledge and experience.

The information and opinions have been obtained from public sources that are believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty is made by the Company with regard to accuracy. The opinions contained herein reflect the current judgments of research analysts and are subject to change without prior notice. All of the above considered, this report should not be viewed as the only source of information, and the Company, nor its affiliates or employees accept any responsibility or liability whatsoever for any direct or indirect damage arising out of or in any way connected with the use of information contained herein, nor for its authenticity.

Investors should note that the Company and/or its affiliates may have or have had positions or derivative positions in the securities or other instruments referred to herein or make or have made a market or otherwise act or have acted as principal in transactions in any of these securities or instruments or may provide or have provided investment banking or consulting services to or serve or have served as a director or a supervisory board member of a company being reported on herein.

The Company operates in the Russian Federation. This report can be used by investors on the territory of the Russian Federation subject to Russian law. The use of the report outside the Russian Federation is subject to the laws of the respective country. For distribution within the UK, this research report is intended only for eligible counterparties or professional clients (as defined in the FSA Rules) and should not be communicated to retail clients.

This report may not be distributed, copied, reproduced or changed without prior written consent from the Company. Further information may be obtained from the Company upon request.

© 2013 BrokerCreditService Ltd. All rights protected and reserved.