DETAIL PROJECT REPORT - Gujarat State Portalgswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2009-10/Junagadh/Jun_IWMP_1.pdf · The project area is nearby world famous wild Gir area. His also famous

IWMP-1 UNA CLUSTER Page 0

DETAIL PROJECT

REPORT

(DPR)

IWMP - 1 UNA CLUSTER, JUNAGADH

[email protected]


Chapter 1 PROJECT BACKGROUND

1.1 Project Background:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………………………………………….11

Table No. 1.1 Basic Project Information about Itavaya:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………….…………………..…………………………………………………...12

Table No. 1.2 Basic Project Information about Dron:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…….…..13

Table No. 1.3 Basic Project Information about Fatsar:

..……………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………..…………….……14

1.2 Need of Watershed Development

Programme……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………….16

Table No. 2 Weight age of the project:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..17

Table No. 2.1 Criteria and weight age for selection of watershed:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………..……….17

Table No. 3 Watershed Information:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………….…………18

1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Villages:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………….19

Table No. 4 Developmental programmes running in the project area:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...……………………20


Table No. 5 Previous Watershed programmes in the project area:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………….20

Chapter 2 PROJECT IMPLIMENTING AGENCY

2.1. Project Implementing Agency

………………………………….………………………………………………………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………….21

2.2 About Gir (East) forest division, Dhari(PIA)

…………………………….……………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………..………………………………….22

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………..22

2.2.2 Programmes/projects of PIA, Dhari :

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………….22

2.3 SWOT Analysis of the DCF Gir East division (PIA):

……………………………………………………………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………….…………………23

Table No. 6 PIA:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………….……………24

Table No. 7 Staff at PIA level:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………………………………………….…………24

Chapter 3 BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA

3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology:

…………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..26


3.1.1 Land use pattern:

…………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………………………………………26

Table No. 8 Land use pattern:

……………………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………………………….26

3.1.2 Soil and topography:

………………………………………………………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..27

Table No. 9 Soil type and topography:

..………………………………………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….27

Table No. 10 Flood and drought condition:

…………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………………………………..……………………………………..27

Table No. 11.1 Soil Erosion:

….………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………………..28

Table No. 11.2 Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress):

..…………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………………………….……………………..28

Table No. 12 Climatic conditions:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………………………………….………28

Table No. 13 Physiographic and relief:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………..29

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………..29


Table No. 14 Land ownership details:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………29

Table No. 15 Agriculture:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….……………..30

Table No. 16 Irrigation:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………….30

Table No. 17 Crop details:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………….30

3.1.4 Livestock:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………..31

Table No. 18 Livestock:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………31

Table No. 19 Drinking water:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………..32

Table No. 20 Details of Common Property Resources:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………….32

3.2. Socio-Economic Profile:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………33

3.2.1 Demographic Status:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………33


Table No. 21 Demographic information:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………….…33

Table No. 22 Literacy rank:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………34

3.2.2 Migration Pattern: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..….…………...34

Table No. 23 Migration details:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………..34

Table No. 24 Poverty:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………………………...35

3.2.3 Infrastructure facilities:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………………………..36

Table No. 25 Village infrastructure:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………………………36

Table No. 26 Facilities / HH assets:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………..36

3.3 Livelihood pattern:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………37

Table No. 27 per Year Income:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………..………………37

3.3.1 Dependence on Common Property Resource:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………37


Table No. 28 Dependence on Forest/CPR:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………….37

Table No. 29 Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution):

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..38

3.4. Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World:

……………………………………………………………………………………….38

The IWMP – 1 Una Cluster project area:

……………………………………………………………………...…………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………….41

Chapter 4 WHATERSHED ACTIVITIES

4.1. Scientific Planning: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..44

Table No. 30 Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects:

……………………………………………………………..……………………………………………………………….………….51

4.2. Institution building :……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………....52

4.2.1 Watershed Committee (WC): …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………….…………………52

Table No. 31.1 Watershed Committee details For Itavaya : …………………………………………………………………………………………………..

……………………………….…………………….52

Table No. 31.2 Watershed Committee details For Dron :

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…….……………………..…………53

Table No. 31.3 Watershed Committee details For Fatsar :

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………..……………………….54


4.2.2 Self Help Group:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………..………………….56

Table No. 32 SHG detail:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………..……………56

4.2.3 User Group:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………..……………57

Table No. 33 UG detail:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………57

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP – 1 Una Cluster project area:

……………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………………………..…..58

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA):

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…58

Table No. 34.1 Entry point activities (EPA) for Itavaya:

………………………………………………………….………………………………………………………………………………………………….…….59

Table No. 34.2 Entry point activities (EPA) for Dron:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………….59

Table No. 34.3 Entry point activities (EPA) for Fatsar:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………..………….60


4.3.2. Watershed Development Works:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………61

Table No. 35 Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.):

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………63

Table No. 36.1 Details p of engineering structure to Surface water resources in the project areas Itavaya:

...……………………………………………………………..………………..63

Table No. 36.2 Details p of engineering structure to Surface water resources in the project areas

Dron:……………………………………………………..…………………….….……….64

Table No. 36.3 Details p of engineering structure o Surface water resources in the project Fatsar :

……………………………………………………………………………………..…………64

Table No. 37 Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas:

………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………….65

Table No. 38 Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas:

……………………………………………………………………………………….………………..65

Table No. 39 Other activities of watershed works phase – project target:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……….66

Table No. 40.1 Details of engineering activity in watershed works Itavaya:

……………………………………………………...………………………………………………………………….…………..66

Table No. 40.2 Details of engineering activity in watershed works Dron:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………....67


Table No.40.3 Details of engineering activity in watershed works Fatsar:

…..……………………………………………………………………….……………………………………………..…………….67

Table No. 40.4 Technical Details of Check Dam:

…………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………………………………………………………68

Table No. 40.5 Technical Details of Pala Plug:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………68

Table No. 40.6 Technical Details of Farm Bund:

………………………….……………………………………………………………………………………...…………………………………………………………….72

Table No.40.7 Quantity Excavation for Farm bund:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………….72

Table No.41 Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works:

……………………………………………………………..…………………………………………………….73

Table No. 42.1 Details of allied / other activities for Itavaya:

………………….………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………..……….………….74

Table No. 42.2 Details of allied / other activities for Dron :

…………………………………….………………………………………………………………….……………………………..………..…………..76

Table No. 42.3 Details of allied / other activities for Fatsar:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………..….…………………………………………………77

Livelihood Intervention

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………………. 84


Papad Production unit Detail

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………….86

Production System – 3: Handicraft unit:

.……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………… …88

Table No. 42.10 Monthly Production Expenditure:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 89

Table No. 42.11 Net Profit:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 89

4.4. Capacity

Building……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……….………………………..…92

Table No. 43 Details of Activities in the CPRs in the Project Areas:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………92

Table No. 44 Capacity Building Institution:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………93

Table No. 45 Capacity Building plan:

…..…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….93

Table No. 46 Information, education and Communication Activities:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….94

Chapter 5 BUDGETING

Table No. 47 Budget at a glance for the project:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………………96


Table No. 48 Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………………….97

Table No. 49 Village wise gap in funds requirement:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………….97

Table No. 50 Details of convergence of IWMP with other schemes:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………98

Chapter 6 EXPECTED OUTCOMES

6.1 Expected Outcomes:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………….100

6.1.1 Employment:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………100

Table No. 52 Employment in Project area:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………….………………………………….100

6.1.2 Migration:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………………………………..101

Table No. 53 Details of seasonal migration from Project area:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………101

6.1.3 Ground water table:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………101

Table No. 54 Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters):

……………………………………………………………………….………………………………….102


6.1.4 Drinking water:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………..102

Table No. 55 Status of Drinking water:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………..102

6.1.5 Crops:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………103

Table No. 56 Details of crop area and yield in the project area:

…………………….……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….103

6.1.6 Horticulture:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………….104

Table No. 57 Area under horticulture:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………104

6.1.7 Vegetative cover:

.…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………104

Table No. 58 Forest/vegetative cover:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………104

6.1.8 Livestock:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………104

Table No. 59 Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in liters, for solids please mention in

kgs. And income in Rs.):

…………………………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………….105


6.1.9 Linkages:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………….105

Table No. 60 Backward-Forward linkage:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………….105

Logical Framework Analysis:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………….107

Chapter 7 QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………....……………………….112

7.2 Plans For Project management:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..113

7.3 Watershed Development Fund:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...………………………………113

7.4 User Charges:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……..113

Chapter 8 MAPS


Village Wise Cost In Lakhs


CHAPTER – 1

P R O J E C T BA C K G R OU N D

1.1 Project Background


ITAVAYA :

(IWMP-1) project is located in Una Taluka, Junagadh District of Gujarat state. The project cluster respective micro watershed codes 5G2A2 C2H , 5G2A2

C3A ,C2k code -120140089560000.The total project area of the watershed is about 1457.5 Ha., has been undertaken to be treated under Integrated Watershed

Management Programme (IWMP) starting year 2009-10.

The nearest town is Una which is about 15 Km from Itavaya and is well connected by pacca road. The project area is nearby world famous wild Gir area. His

also famous are Asiatic lion’s.

Only one Patel and OBC communities are here present in village. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on Rainfed agriculture, animal husbandry.

The Project area falls under the Gir East Division.

Table No.1.1 Basic Project Information about Itavaya:

SR No.

Name of the Project

Village Gram

Panchayat Taluka District

Area of the project

Area proposed to be treated

Total project

cost(Rs.in Lakh)

PIA Name C2k code

1 IWMP-1 Itavaya 120140089560000 Itavaya Una Junagadh 1457.5. 1457.5 Ha 17490000 D.C.F.-

Gir(East) Dhari


Dron :

(IWMP-1) project is located in Una Taluka, Junagadh District of Gujarat state. The project cluster respective micro watershed codes 5G2A2 C1C , 5G2A2

C1B, 5G2A2 C2E , C2k code -120140089450000.The total project area of the watershed is about 1341.8 Ha., has been undertaken to be treated under Integrated

Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) starting year 2009-10.

The nearest town is Una which is about 22 Km from Dron and is well connected by pacca road. The project area is nearby world famous wild Gir area. His

also famous are Asiatic lion’s.

Koli, Patel, Brahmin, Rabari, Muslim, Harijan, Ahir, communities are here present in village. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on Rain fed

agriculture, animal husbandry and Labour work.


Table No.1.2 Basic Project Information about Dron:

SR No.

Name of the Project

Village Gram


Area of the project


Total project

cost(Rs.in Lakh)

PIA Name C2k code

1 IWMP-1 Dron 120140089450000 Dron Una Junagadh 1341.8 1341.8 Ha. 16101600.00 D.C.F.-

Gir(East) Dhari


Fatsar :

(IWMP-1) project is located in Una Taluka, Junagadh District of Gujarat state. The project cluster respective micro watershed codes 5G2A2 C2H, 5G2A2

C3A ,C2k code -12014089560000.The total project area of the watershed is about 1279.5 Ha., has been undertaken to be treated under Integrated Watershed

Management Programme (IWMP) starting year 2009-10.

The nearest town is Una which is about 12 Km Fatsar And is well connected by pacca road. The project area is nearby world famous wild Gir area. His also

famous are Asiatic lion’s.

Prajapati, Koli, Patel, Brahmin, Rabari, Harijan, Muslim, Bavaji communities are here present in village. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on

Rain fed agriculture, animal husbandry and Labour work.


Table No.1.3 Basic Project Information about Fatsar:

SR No.

Name of the project

Village Gram


Area of the project


Total project

cost(Rs.in Lakh)

PIA Name C2k code

1 IWMP-1 Fatsar 12014089560000 Fatsar Una Junagadh 1279.5. 1279.5 15354000 D.C.F.-

Gir(East) Dhari


JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Figure 2, Geographic location of Una Watershed

IWMP-1 (UNA)


Need of Watershed Development Programme:

Watershed Development Programmer is prioritized on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual wages,

Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rain fed agriculture, Drinking water situation in the area, Percentage of the

degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has already developed/treated, Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain.

Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given to IWMP – 1 Una Cluster given in table no. 2.

The total number of families under BPL which is less than 12 percent of the total households of the every village. Hence a score of 2.5 is allotted. The

percentage of schedule castes in the village is about 30 percent to the total population; hence a score of 5 was allotted. Rain fed agriculture forms the primary occupation

of the village due to the fact that ground water is saline and hence unfit for usage. More than 60 percent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual

wages earned by the Labour is less than the minimum wages hence a composite rank of 5, 3 and 5 are allotted respectively.

Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under DPAP block. Drinking water is in good condition,

so nothing problem in the village. The soil is very permeable and production of the land can be significantly enriched with the availability of timely irrigation. Cluster

approach was followed taking into consideration this micro watershed covering a total area of 4078.8 Ha. Thus a cumulative score of 88.5.

All the parameters taken together give a cumulative score of 88.5 to the watershed (reference Table 2.1 below).


Table no. 2: Weight age of the project

Name of the Project

Project type

Weight age

IWMP-1 FLAT

& HILLY

I ii iii iv V vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii

2.5 3 5 5 3 10 15 5 10 10 0 15 5

Table no. 2.1: Criteria and weight age for selection of watershed:

No Criteria Maximum

score Ranges & scores

I Poverty index(% of poor to population)

15 Above 80(10) Above 100(15) Above 100(15) -

ii % of SC/ ST population 7.5 Above 50(7.5) Above 50(7.5) Above 50(7.5) -

iii Actual wages 7.5 Above 50 To 50(7.5)

Above 80 To 50(5) Above 0 To 50(3) -

iv % of small and marginal farmers 10 Above 50 To 50(7.5) Above 80 To 50(10) Above 80 To 50(10) -

V

Ground water status 10 Above 80 To 50(10) Above 80 To 50(7.5) Above 0 To 50(5) -

vi Moisture index/ DPAP/ DDP Block

10 Above 80To 50(10) Above 80To 50(10) Above 80To 50(10) -

vii Area under rain-fed agriculture 10 Above 80 To (10) Above 50 To 80(7.5) Above 0 To 30(5) -

viii Drinking water 15 Above 100 (15) Above 0 To 30(5) Above 80 To 50(10) -

ix Degraded land 5 Above 10 To 20(3) Above 10 To 30(5) Above 10 To 30(5) -


-

x Productivity potential of the land

10 Above 80 To 50(10) Above 80 To50 (10) Above 80 To50 (10) -

xi

Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/ treated

- - - - -

xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

- - - - -

xiii Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous micro-Watersheds in the project)

7.5 Above 80To 50(7.5) Above 80 To50 (7.5) Above 80 To 50(7.5) -

Total

Table no.3: Watershed information

No. Of watersheds to be treated Watershed code Watershed regime/type/order

7 5G2A2 C2h , 5G2A2 C2a , 5G2A2 C1c , 5G2A2 C1b, 5G2A2 C2e,5G2A2 G2g, 5G2A2 C2f

Mini Watershed


1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the villages : (Itavaya, Dron, Fatsar) This villages being very back ward, has been on top priority of a number of developmental projects. These programmes are Eco Development Committee

(EDC), Gokul Gram Yojana, Sampurna Gramin Rojagar Yojana(SGRY),Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme(MGNREGS), TSC Yojana, Sardar

Awas Yojana(SAY), Javahar Rojgar Yojana (JRY), Indira Awas Yojana (IAY),and WASMO.

1. EDC: Construction of Check Dam and Agriculture land leveling has been taken of under EDC.

2. Gokul Gram Yojana : Contraction of CC Road, Community Hall, Play house, Tube well, Pipeline and Aveda

3. Sampurna Gramin Rojagar Yojana (SGRY): Contraction of Primary school compound, Metal Road and Metal Road Repairing. Activity has been Taken-up under SGRY.

4. Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS): Boribandhs and Road Activity have been taken-up under NREGA.

5. TSC Yojana: individual toilets are constructed under TSC programme. All the remaining house hold will be covered under the scheme.

6. Sardar Awas Yojana (SAY): House has been constructed under Sardar Awas Yojana.

7. Javahar Rojgar Yojana (JRY): Construction of the Tree Stand in Public Place.

8. Indira Awas Yojana (IAY): House has been constructed under Indira Awas Yojana.

9. WASMO: Construction of water storage tank, underground water storage tank and water pipe line etc. in this Project.


Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area:

Name of the Project

SR no

Name of the Programme/scheme

Sponsoring agency Objectives of the

Programme/scheme Year of commencement

Villages covered

Estimated number of beneficiaries

IWMP-1

1 Gokul gram yojana Gujarat Gov. CC road & Community hall 2002-03 3 2920Persons

2 SGRY Central Gov. Metal road & Primary School Compound

2002-03 3 560 Persons

3 MGNREGAS Central Gov. Boribandh & Road & Ponds 2007-08 3 1020 Persons

4 TSC Central Gov. Sanitation 2007-08 3 50 Persons

5 SAI Central Gov. Housing

2008-09 3 150 Person

6 JRY Gujarat Gov. Tree Stand 2005-06 3 320 Persons

7 IAY Gujarat Gov. Housing 2008-09 3 70 Persons

8 WASMO Central Gov. Water Pipe Line 2008-09 2 4000 Persons

9 Sakhi Mandal Gujarat Gov. Create SHG Group 2006-07 3 280 Persons

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area:

SR no

Project name

Year started

Name of villages

No. Of micro

watershed

Watershed codes

Area under treatment

Funding source

Nodal agency

PIA Total cost

Expenditure incurred up to start of IWMP

% financial completion

% physical completion

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -


CHAPTER - 2

P R O J E CT IM P L EM E N T I NG A G E N C Y


2.1. Project Implementing Agency

The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency (GSWMA), the State

Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. The PIAs are responsible for implementation of watershed project.

These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under State/ Central Governments, Government Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate

Panchayat, Voluntary Organizations (VOs).The PIA for IWMP- 5,Junagadh Watershed project is Gir(East) forest division, Dhari.

2.2 About Gir (East) forest division, Dhari (PIA). 2.2.1 The organization and its objectives: The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA), Junagadh is a district level nodal agency and was established on 17 Feb 2010 to oversee the smooth

implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the chairman of the DWDU. The DWDU has dedicated and experienced

staff comprising one Project manager(deputation from Gujarat Forest Department), a technical expert and a multidisciplinary team of agriculture expert, community

mobilization expert and Data Entry Operator, civil engineer, surveyor, accountant and Messenger, The objectives of the DCF Gir West Division, Junagadh are supervising,

planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development projects and related developmental activities in the district as per guidelines.

2.2.2 Programmes/projects of PIA, Dhari :

At present IWMP-1 projects have been sanctioned by Government of India for Junagadh district. The entry point activities of all the IWMP -1 projects have

been identified by the respective PIAs in the district. DCF Gir East division Dhari is PIA for IWMP-1 project .


2.3 SWOT Analysis of the DCF Gir east division (PIA):

Strength:

(1) Dedicated and experienced staff and a multidisciplinary team

(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency.

(3)Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, for capacity building and guidance

(4)Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar,

(5)District level monitoring, coordination & Co-operation Committee

Weakness:

(1) No permanent office building. Opportunities: (1) A number of different other development schemes of the government are running; so, there can be horizontal integration and convergence of programmes (2) Better financial provision under IWMP

Threats:

(1) Rainfall being very scarce and unreliable in the project area, the activities planned to be taken up may yield limited impact

(2) Irregularities in fund flow can disrupt the smooth functioning

(3) Lack of contribution and cooperation from local people

(4) Low literacy rate in the project area


Table no. 6: PIA:

SR. No. Names of the project Details of PIA

1 IWMP-1

Dhari

(i) Type of organization Line Department

(ii) Name of organization D.C.F. Gir East Dhari

(iii) Designation & Address D.C.F. Gir East, Gir East division, Dhari.

(iv) Telephone 225044

(v) Fax 02875245344

(vi) E-mail [email protected]

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level:

SR no

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly

remuneration

1 Maniswari Raja S. 35 M D.C.F B.Sc 4 Project Implementing And Management 30531/-

2 Mulani Kishorbhai Babubhai 53 M R.F.O. B.Sc 30 Year Project Monitoring 31437/-

3 Makavana Kailash Karasanbhai 33 M W.D.T.-Surveyor I.T.I (Surveyor) B.A 1 Year Surveying Works 6000/-

4 Zala Piyush Saramanbhai 22 M W.D.T.-Agri. B.R.S(Agri) Nil Agriculture Works 8000/-

5 Lakhani Tejas Manilal 23 M W.D.T.-Accountant B.Com 2 Year Accounts Works 7000/-

6 Sosa Lakhaman Tidabhai 24 M W.D.T.- D.E.O P.G.D.C.A 1 Year Data Entry Works 5000/-

7 Vaza Pratibhaben Rameshbhai 23 F W.D.T. C.M.E. B.R.S. (Home Science) 1 Year Community 8000/-


CHAPTER – 3

BASIC

INFORMATI

ON OF THE

PROJECT

AREA

B A S I C IN FO R M AT IO N O F TH E P R O JE C T A REA


3.1 Geography and Geo-hydrology 3.1.1 Land use pattern: A. Itavaya

The net geographical area of Itavaya watershed is about 1457.5 ha., about90% land is under Agriculture which is completely rain-fad. Mainly a

Kharif crop is taken. About 10% of the total land is classified under wasteland of which 60 percent is cultivable and rest is uncultivable.

B. Dron

The net geographical area of Dron watershed is about 1341.8 Ha., about 80% of land is under Agriculture which is completely rain-fad. Mainly a

Kharif crop is taken. About 20% of the total land is classified under wasteland of which 60 percent is cultivable and rest is uncultivable.

C. Fatsar

The net geographical area of Itavaya watershed is about 1279.5 Ha., about 75% of land is under Agriculture which is completely rain-fad. Mainly a

Kharif crop is taken. About 22% of the total land is classified under wasteland of which 60 percent is cultivable and rest is uncultivable and hilly, and 3 % is Permanent

pasture.

Table no. 8: Land use pattern:

SR. No.

Names of the villages

Geographical Area of the village

Ha.

Forest Area Ha.

Land under agricultural use

Ha.

Rainfed area Ha.

Permanent pastures

Ha.

Wasteland

Cultivable Ha.

Non-cultivable Ha.

1 Itvaya 1457.10 - 907.80 402.10 430.5212 162.00 387.30

2 Dron 1341.80 - 928.40 512.20 393.5035 398.30 115.10

3 Fatsar 1279.80 - 949.70 546.20 280.3715 221.10 109.00


3.1.2 Soil and topography:

IWMP - 1 Una Cluster watershed project falls under South-West Gujarat Agro Climatic Zone. The soil is mainly loam and saline. The soil is black and red color. The depth of soil is moderate too deep about 25 to 75 cm. The predominant texture of soil is loamy and silt and clay. The soil fertility is very poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The topography of the area is moderate ranging from 0-10% slope.

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:

SR.

No.

Name of the Agro-climatic zone covers project

area Area in Ha.

Names of the

villages

Major soil types

Topography a)Type b) Area in Ha.

1 South-West Gujarat Agro climatic zone 1457.10 Itvaya Black-Red 1457.10 Hilly

2 South-West Gujarat Agro climatic zone 1341.80 Dron Black-Red 1341.80 Hilly

3 South-West Gujarat Agro climatic zone 1279.80 Fatsar Black-Red 1279.80 Hilly

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:

SR. No. Name of the Villages Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)

1 Itvaya NIL NIL

2 Dron NIL NIL

3 Fatsar NIL NIL


Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (Ha.) Run off

(mm/ year) Average soil loss

(Tones/ Ha./ year) Water erosion

- 22545808 A Sheet 1452 B Rill 523 C Gully 289

Sub-Total 2264 2264 22545808 Wind erosion - -

Total 2264 2264 22545808

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)

Name of the Villages Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity(Inherent/Ingress)

Itvaya - - -

Dron - - -

Fatsar - - -

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions:

Name of the project Year Rain fall in mm. Temperature (c. ) Highest intensity of Rain fall

(mm in a day) Max Min

IWMP-1

2005 60 43 10 160 2006 55 43 11 150 2007 65 42 10 205 2008 66 42 11 210

2009 61 44 13 48

The rainfall is scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of drought in every three to four years. The average rainfall of this area is about 1376 mm

(from past five year data) with a highest intensity of 155 mm within span of a day.


Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief

Name of the villages Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams

Itvaya 5-7.5Metres 7-8% Local River & Machundri River

Dron 5-7.5Metres 7-8% Local River & Machundri River

Fatsar 4-6 Metres 5-6% Local River & Machundri River

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture:

Lack of surface water source and high salinity of ground water has limited the sufficient base for irrigation as well as for drinking purpose. The average land

holding is about 5 ha. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Groundnut and Cotton. Some of the farmers take up rain-fad castor crop if rainfall is good. The land

conservation measures such as earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area will help them to take up a rabi crop of mustard or cumin in the residual moisture.

able no. 14: Land ownership details

SR. No. Name of the Villages Total owned land (in ha.)

Gen OBC SC ST

1 Itvaya 122 15 5 -

2 Dron 26 45 3 1

3 Fatsar 176 20 - -

Table no. 15: Agriculture

SR. No. Name of the Villages Net sown area

One time Two times Three times

1 Itvaya 345.8595 177.1327 8.67

2 Dron 98.46 42.33 14.65

3 Fatsar 471.2 358.4 67.6


Table no. 16: Irrigation

SR.

No. Name of the Villages

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well/Tube well

Availability

months Net area Gross area

Availability


Availability


1 Itvaya 3 136 130 6 148 140 9 364 305

2 Dron - - - 6 187 187 10 319 317

3 Fatsar 3 189 182 6 164 162 9 381 356

Table no. 17: Crop details

SR. No. Name of the Villages

Kharif (Monsoon)

Groundnut Cotton

Area

(Ha.) Production (kg.)

Productivity

(Kg. /ha.)

Area

(Ha.)

Production

(Kg.)

Productivity

(Kg. /ha.)

1 Itvaya 240.39 268000 1114.85 105.47 116000 1099.83

2 Dron 83.06 70100 843.96 16.40 64000 3902.43

3 Fatsar 286.6 334200 1166.08

184.60 224350 1215.33

SR. no.

Name of the Villages

Rabi (Winter) Wheat Onion millet

Area (Ha.)

Production (Kg.)

Productivity (Kg./Ha.)

Area (Ha.)

Production (Kg.)


Area (Ha.)

Production (Kg.)


1 Itvaya 108.23 190361 1758.85 66.88 115000 1719.50 2.02 2200 1089.10

2 Dron 40.73 56000 1374.90 11.6 2400 1500 - - -

3 Fatsar 220 817500 3715.90 73.2 274500 3750 65.2 1304000 20000


R. no. Name of the Villages

Zaid (Summer) Til

Area (Ha.) Production (Kg.) Productivity (Kg. /Ha.)

1 Itvaya 8.67 18200 2099.19

2 Dron 14.65 18600 1269.62

3 Fatsar 67.6 40560 600.00

3.1.4 Livestock:

The village has 617 cows, 448 buffaloes, 490 bullocks, 163 goats and 260, Hen 330, sheep and other 561. Majority of rabari community depends on goat and sheep rearing for their livelihood. Cows and buffaloes are of local breed. Lack of rain and surface water has reduced the fodder and pasture availability for their animals. Milk production is so low that there is no dairy cooperative in the village.

Table no. 18: Livestock

SR.

No.

Name of the

Villages

Buffalo

(Lit/Annum) Cow (Lit/Annum) Total Milk (Buffalo

Cow)

Goat

No

Sheep

No

Bullock

No

Hen

Others

No milk No Milk

1 Itvaya 153 5067 266 6300 11367 56 115 181 - 253

2 Dron 43 2200 85 2650 4850 5 4 51 50 260

3 Fatsar 252 683 266 721 1404 102 146 258 280 48

Table no. 19: Drinking water

SR.

No. Name of the Villages Ground water table (mt) Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality

1 Itvaya 50 Pipe -Well 12 Good

2 Dron 53 Pipe -Well 12 Good

3 Fatsar 65 Pipe -Well 12 Good


Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources

SR.

No.

Names of the

project

CPR

Particulars

Total Area (Ha.)

Area owned/ In possession of Area available for treatment (Ha.)

Pvt. persons

Govt.

(specify

deptt.)

PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

Pvt.

persons

Govt.

(specify

deptt.)

PRI Any other (Pl.

Specify)

IWMP-1

Una

Wasteland/ degraded land s

Pastures - 1104.3962 - - - - -

Orchards - - - - - - -

Village Woodlot - - - - - - - -

Forest - - - - - - - -

Village Ponds/ Tanks - 16 - - - 7 - -

Community Buildings - 6 - - - - - -

Weekly Markets - - - - - - - -

Permanent markets - - - 3 - - - -

Temples/ Places of worship - - - 17 - - - -

Others (Pl. specify) - - - - - - - -

3.2. Socio-Economic Profile 3.2.1 Demographic Status: IWMP - 1 Una Cluster watershed project has a total of 1244 households with a population of 7563 (as per base-line survey) out of which are male 3827 and

female 3736 .The sex ratio is 914 female to 1000 male. There are 212 BPL families. The average family size is 6. The literacy rate is average 40.24 percent; male literacy

rate is 67.81 percent (of total male population) and female literacy rate is 52.92 percent (of total female population). It is noticeable that only 302 persons have reached


up to 12th standard. The major castes in the village are Koli, Patel, Prajapati, Darbar, Ahir, Brahmin, Bavaji, Rabari, Schedule Caste and Muslim communities. Majority of

population is involved in agriculture and animal husbandry.

Table no. 21: Demographic information

SR.

No.

Name of the

Villages

SC ST OBC OTHER Population

M F % M F % M F % M F % M F Total

1 Itvaya 143 141 17.09 0 0 0.00 314 297 36.76 395 372 46.15 852 810 1662

2 Dron 7 4 0.70 11 7 1.14 688 641 84.48 116 99 13.68 822 751 1573

3 Fatsar 84 70 4.62 84 85 5.07 865 804 50.04 698 645 40.27 1731 1604 3335

Table no. 22: Literacy rank

SR. No.


Year SC ST OBC OTHER TOTAL %

M F % M F % M F % M F % M F TOTAL

1 Itvaya

1to14 15 10 1.50 - - - 54 32 5.17 154 127 16.91 223 169 392 23.58

>14 45 20 3.91 - - - 150 70 13.23 301 198 30.02 496 288 784 47.17

2 Dron 1to14 0 0 - 0 0 - 157 101 16.40 18 16 2.16 175 117 292 18.56

>14 1 2 0.19 2 1 0.19 265 201 29.62 49 40 5.66 317 244 561 35.66

3 Fatsar 1to14 15 5 0.60 11 6 0.50 205 175 11.40 150 160 9.30 381 346 727 21.80

>14 22 10 0.96 20 10 0.90 315 276 17.72 360 215 17.24 717 511 1228 36.82


3.2.2 Migration Pattern: People migrate during summer season to different parts of the state like Surat, Junagadh, Amareli and Suarashtra as daily wagers, agricultural labours, construction workers and diamond polishing. Lack of fodder availability and grazing land for smaller ruminant force these people to migrate to other places. Table no. 23: Migration details

Sr.No

.

Name of the

Villages

Total

population

Migration Migration by months

Main reason for

migration

Income

during

migration /

month

Total Male Female Up to 3

months 3-6 months

More than 6

months

1 Itvaya 1931 269 77 192 42 83 142 Employment 10000

2 Dron 1873 300 155 145 64 98 138 Employment 7500

3 Fatsar 3759 424 190 234 38 106 280 Employment 12000

Table no. 24: Poverty

SR. No


Total Household

BPL

% of BPL HH Total Land less HH % of land less HH 0-16 16-20 Total

1 Itvaya 329 17 50 67 20.36 15 4.56

2 Dron 319 4 31 35 10.97 12 3.76

3 Fatsar 596 36 74 110 18.46 38 6.37


.2.3 Infrastructure facilities:

IWMP-1 watershed area is well connected with Una Taluka with pucca roads. The village has electricity connectivity under Jyotigram Yojana of the State

Government. Nearly 75 percent of households in the village have their personal electric meters. IWMP - 1 Una Cluster project area has a primary school with all facilities

like personal computers. For middle and higher secondary education, the students have to go to Una village which is about 7 to 18kilometers away. This also contributes

to lower education level of the people. The villages do not have a Primary Health Centre for which villagers have to go to Una which is 7 to 18 Km. away.

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure

Sr.No.


Pacca road to

the village (Y/N)

Schools

Colleges (Number)

Post Office (Distance)

Banks (Number)

Distance from

nearest market

yard

Milk collection

center (Number)

Milk cooperative

(Number)

Other cooperatives / CBIs (Number)

Any other institution

LP UP HS

1 Itvaya Y y Y N N 1 N 14Km Y N

2 Dron Y Y Y N N 1 N 22Km Y N

3 Fatsar y y Y y N 1 n 13Km y N


Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets

SR.

No.

Name of the

Villages

HHs with

electricity

HHs with

safety

latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs with

TV set

HHs with

cooking

gas

HHs with

Drinking

water

HHs with

fridge Land line Mobile 2-

wheeler

4-

wheeler

1 Itvaya Y 15 201 68 5 57 49 315 27

2 Dron Y 10 205 29 - 41 16 298 2

3 Fatsar y 30 378 145 5 166 50 413 78

3.3 Livelihood pattern:

Table no. 27: Per Year Income

SR. No. Name of the Villages Agriculture

(In Rs.)

Animal husbandry

(In Rs.)

Casual Labour

(In Rs.)

Others

(In Rs.)

Total

(In Rs.)

1 Itvaya 1559000 59000 2063500 366000 487000

2 Dron 2383000 70000 3983700 230000 117000

3 Fatsar 1429700 180000 3915000 1090000 1538000

3.3.1 Dependence on Common Property Resource


Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

SR. No. Name of the

Villages

Benefit type 1 Benefit type 2 Benefit type 3 Total income

% sells Income % sells Income % sells Income

- - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - -

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

Sr.No Name of the Villages Total

workforce Agriculture

Animal

husbandry

(AH)

Agriculture +

AH

Casual

labour Services Business Others

1 Itvaya 329 142 9 - 166 2 6 4

2 Dron 319 55 1 - 250 1 6 6

3 Fatsar 596 240 5 - 260 13 22 50

3.4. Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World:


“The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per hectare of land.

Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under that crop.”

Data are made available by the Baseline survey (for IWMP - 1 Una Cluster), Some data collect for Gujarat Krushi university junagadh. The results indicate

that IWMP - 1 Una Cluster has very low productivity compared to world, India, Gujarat and Junagadh. The productivity is low not only because that the land is

unproductive or the farmer’s lack the skills to manage their crop but also due lack to of source of irrigation, and irregularly of rain.

The Junagadh area comes under arid zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If they get good rainfall they generally grow high value crops like

Groundnut, wheat, Cotton and Vegetable’s etc. In case of low rainfall they go for black gram, sorghum and sesame. So we can say that monsoon decides cropping patterns

of IWMP - 1 Una Cluster area.


Figure 3, Comparative Productivity of Groundnut, IWMP-1

The world productivity of Groundnuts is 1550 Kg/ha. In India. It is grown in about 65.90 lakh ha. With a production of 96.15 lakh tones and productivity of

1459 kg./ha. Gujarat alone produced about 25% of the total Groundnut of our country from 50% of the area with a record productivity of about 1776 kg/ha. Junagadh

district has very good productivity 1806 kg /ha. The IWMP - 1 Una Cluster project area has only 1310 kg/ha productivity. It is very low compare to district, State, India

and world.


Figure4, Comparative Productivity of Wheat, IWMP-1

The world productivity of Wheat is 2760 Kg/ha. In India. It is grown in about 2,80,40,000 ha. With a production of 7,85,68,000 lakh tones and productivity

of 2802 kg. /ha. In Gujarat productivity of wheat about 3013 kg/ha. Junagadh district has very good productivity 4225 kg /ha. The IWMP – 1 Una Cluster project area

has only 2530 kg/ha productivity. It is very low compare to district, State, India and world.


The IWMP - 1 UNA Cluster project area has low productivity because of the following reasons:

i) Full dependence on monsoon:

IWMP-1 Junagadh area is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation facility, 100% of the total

cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon. Therefore, the success or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure of agriculture production.

ii) Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area: Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and insufficient money for fertilizer. Many a times they don’t get

fertilizer at the right time.

iii) Traditional farming methods: This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such as multiple cropping. They don’t

use FYM and other input in a proper way; that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors contribute to low productivity.

iv) Lack of adequate farm machinery: Even today a large number of farmers in IWMP – 1 Una Cluster project area use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have adequate machinery like

seed drill. So, old machineries take more time in tillage practices.

v) Lack of finances for farmers:

In WMP-5 Junagadh project area most of the farmers are marginal and small. They do not have enough money to buy good quality seeds, machinery and

other inputs.


vi) Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers: Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher land productivity. In

IWMP - 1 Una Cluster project area, however, there are two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in irrigated condition. But in IWMP -1

Una Cluster project area 100 percent of land depend on rainfall. In IWMP – 1 Una Cluster project area mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea. This

has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land.

vii) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing: 5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So he sells to local traders at the low

prices. Farmers mainly face proper means of transportation and roads. And second problem is farmers don’t have proper storage facilities.


WATE RSHED ACTIVITIES

CHAPTER - 4


Watershed Activities

Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-arid tropics. These regions are

characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of migration. Several studies have

identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible

framework for the next generation watershed development.

4.1. Scientific Planning: I) Cluster Approach This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The IWMP – 1 Una Cluster Project consists of

11 micro- watersheds namely 5G1C5c4,5G1C5c5j, 5G1C5c5h, 5G1C5c5m,5G1C5c5b, G1C5c5c,5G1C5c5d,5G1C5c5k, 5G1C5d1d, 5G1C5d1c, 5G1C5d1f as their respective

codes. Further IWMP - 1 Una Cluster watershed project is in continuation with other watershed projects namely Itavay, Dron and Fatsar Projects this gives an element

of continuation of the programme.

ii) Base line Survey To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a benchmark for any intervention

during and posts implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was undertaken which involved household census survey, Bio-physical

survey and Village level data collection from Talati–cum mantri. Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and

every household in the village. This gave in the details of the demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household,

cattle population, and net consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their benefits

Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in the area, crop taken in

the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.


iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the programme. This has created an

emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory

approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, and monitoring and post- withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various

PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and season calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and

watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn diagram were used to identify

various local vegetation (apt for afforestration), Fodders crops, various institution and their significance in the life of the farmers

W.D.Ts Give information about agri to farmer. Bio-physical survey by watershed committee

member& WDTs.


Social Map:

Social Map is different from other regular maps in significant ways. For one, it is made by local people and not by experts. For another, it is not drawn to

scale. It depicts what the local people believe to be relevant and important for them.

The chief feature of a social map is that it is a big help in developing a broad understanding of the various facets of social reality, viz., social stratification,

demographics, settlement patterns, social infrastructure, etc.

Resource map draw by local people in PRA Social map draw by local people in PRA


The map neatly depicts the lanes, sub-lanes, school, railway track, temple, post-office, well, community hall, etc. in the village. In addition, using different

symbols, it provides house hold-wise details on the educational status of children both by age and by gender.

Resource Map :

Resource map is one of the most commonly used PRA methods next to social map. While the social map focuses on habitation, community facilities, roads,

temples, etc., the resource map focuses on the natural resources in the locality and depicts land, rivers, fields, vegetation, etc. A resource map may cover habitation as

well.

A resource map in PRA is not drawn to scale. It is not done by the local people. The local people are considered to have an in depth knowledge of the

surroundings where they have survived for a long time.

Topography, terrain and slops

Forest, vegetation and tree species

Land and land use, command area, tenure, boundaries and ownership

Water, water bodies, irrigation sources, rivers and drainage

Agricultural development, cropping pattern, productivity, etc.

Resource maps have been found especially useful because they provide a focused spatial structure for discussion and analysis. They help to create a common understanding amongst the participants as well as a baseline for monitoring and evaluation.

The mapping was followed by a detailed discussion on the present status of natural resources in the village, in which the problems and impact of the

structures were brought up.

The resource map helped them realize that the mismanagement of natural resources and the neglect of traditional water harvesting structures had led to a

perennial drought like situation in their village.


Daily Activity Chart:

Daily activity schedule also referred to as daily schedule, daily activity profile, daily routine and 24-hour method, is a popular PRA method used to

explore the activities of an individual, group or community, on a daily basis. This method forms part of the family of temporal PRA methods.

In seasonal diagrams the temporal analysis is done on a seasonal or monthly basis, while in daily activity schedule the basis of temporal analysis is

hours or periods of the day. It depicts not only the various activities but also the duration of those activities. Its visual nature makes it an attractive method.

Daily activity schedule has been used to:

Enhance an understanding of who does what, when and for how long, in the community.

Increase gender sensation, and create an awareness about who is responsible for what activities in the community and why

Finalize timings of interventions, e.g., training classes, literacy classes, on-formal education, etc. for the target group, based on their convenience and

availability of leisure.

Preference Chart :

Preference chart during by village people they have ranked their preference for a number of different income generating activities. Preference chart is

detailed what is requirement of village people. the village people identified their own, criteria including the amount of time required by the activity and the level of

profit possible.

Growth the village people skill.

What activity gives the maximum income in short production time?

How many required material and man power.


iv)Use of GIS and remote sensing for planning Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development. a) Prioritization

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-morphological, Soil, BPL

Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given proper weight age according to the DOLR specification.

This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.

b) Planning An action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent, soil Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to create a map. Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:5000 was used for identifying various locations for soil and water conservation structures. c) Hydrological modeling Hydrology modeling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, and Flow accumulation. This model overlaid over

cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human error which generally occurs while

calculating the catchment area of a check dam.


Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects

SR. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria was used

(A) Planning

Cluster approach Yes

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute

Baseline survey Yes

Hydro-geological survey Yes

Contour mapping Yes

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover

Ridge to Valley treatment Yes

Online IT connectivity between

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes

(3) SLNA and DOLR Yes

Availability of GIS layers -

1. Cadastral map Yes

2. Village boundaries Yes

3. Drainage Yes

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes

5. Land use Yes

6. Ground water status Yes

7. Watershed boundaries Yes


8. Activity Yes

Crop simulation models# No

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil nutrient

analysis No

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# No

Weather Station -

(B) Inputs

1. Bio-pesticides No

2. Organic manures Yes

3. Vermin compost Yes

4. Bio-fertilizer Yes

5. Water saving devices Yes

6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes

7. Bio-fencing Yes

8. Nutrient budgeting No

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No

Any other (please specify)


4.2. Institution building 4.2.1 Watershed Committee (WC)

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village. This committee

is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed committee with the secretary who will be a paid

functionary. A watershed Committee was formed accordingly in IWMP- 5 Junagadh project area. Since the watershed has only one village so no separate watershed sub-

committee was formed in the village. Capacity building training to the watershed committee is given by WDT.

The watershed committee has a pivotal role to play during and after the project implementation period. Table no. 31.1: Watershed Committee details For Itavaya

SR. No.

Date of Registration as a Society (dd/mm/

yyyy)

Name Designation M/F

SC

ST O

BC

OTHER

SF MF

LF Land-less

UG SHG GP Any

other

Educational

qualification

Function/s

assigned#

1 Under

Progress

Andani Hasamukhbhai Premjibhia

President M 1 1 1

2 Vegad Vithalbhai shambhubhai

Secretary

M 1 1 1

3 Andani Shobhanaben Hasamukhbhai

Member

F 1 1 1

4

Hirapara Hirajibhai Nanajibhai

Member

M 1 1 1

5 Korat Jayagauri Jaysukhbhai Member

F 1 1 1

6 Laheri Ishvarlal Jadavbhai Member M 1 1 1


7 Vaddoriya Valjibhai Vithalbhai

Member

M 1 1 1

8 Vasoya Kishorbhai Devjibhai Member

M 1 1 1

9 Sarvaiya divyaben danabhai Member

F 1 1

10 Vaghela Bajuben Nanjibhai Member

F 1 1 1

11 Munani Kishorbhai Babubhai R.F.O

M 1 1

Table no. 31.2: Watershed Committee details For Dron

SR. No.

Date of Registration as a Society (dd/mm/

yyyy)


SC ST OBC

OTHER

SF MF LF Land-less

UG SHG GP Any

other

Educational

qualification

Function/s assigned#

1

Under Progress

Savaliya Sureshbhai Madhubhai President M 1 1 1

2 Shiyal Manjuben Govind bhai Secretary

F 1 1 1

3 Lilaben Jagjivanbhai Gohil Member

F 1 1 1

4 Dhunaben Balabhai Tita Member

F 1 1

5 Divaliban Ranchodbhai Baraiya Member

F 1 1 1

6 Bagarubhai Rukhadbhai Jadav Member

M 1 1 1

7 Vijaybhai Thirubhai Thumbar Member

M 1 1 1


8 Aravindbhai Parsotambhai Shingada

Member

M 1 1 1

9 Aslambhai Rajakbhai RindBloch Member

M 1 1 1

10 Kishorbhai BabubhaiMulani R.F.O

M 1 1

Table no. 31.3: Watershed Committee details For Fatsar

SR. No.

Date of Registrati

on as a Society

(dd/mm/ yyyy)


SC ST OBC

OTHER

SF MF LF Land-less

UG SHG

GP Any othe

r

Educational qualificatio

n

Function/s

assigned#

1

Under Progress

Kanubhai Bhimajibhai Jasani President M 1 1 1

2 Shantibhai Ravajibhai Pokiya Secretary

M 1 1 1

3 Sharadaben Vithalbhai Vekariya

W.D.T

F 1 1 1

4 Veljibhai Vallbhbhai Khokhar

Member

M 1 1 1

5 Manjulaben Kalubhai Sondarva

Member

F 1 1 1

6 Kushumben Jagadishbhai Pansuriya

Member

F 1 1 1

7 Shantuben Madhubhai Paramar

Member

F 1 1 1

8 Nareshbhai Ramjibhai Pokiya

Member

M 1 1 1

9 Shantibhai Parasotambhai Member M 1 1 1


Jagani

10 Vinubhai Haribhai Pokiya Member

M 1 1 1

11 Piyushbhai Saramanbhai Zala

W.D.T

M 1

# Only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned. A. PNP and PRA B. Planning C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify). 4.2.2 Self Help Group

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self-help group initiatives for Mel and

women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self-help groups include landless and poor men and women.

Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focused Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the men and women, which came up with the

following observations:

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders


c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people

d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking. It was planned to have some capacity building training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote

men and women empowerment.

Table no. 32: SHG detail

SR. No.

Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST/OBC/Other in each

category

No. of BPL in each

category

With only

Men

With only

Women

With

both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 12 4 - 159

Lend Less 99 38 137 43 22 65 56 27 83

SF 18 4 22 - - - - - -

MF - - - - - - - - -

LF - - - - - - - - -

Total 12 4 - 159 Total 117 42 159 43 22 65 56 27 83

4.2.3 User Group:

User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The user group collects user charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits.

It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community Spirit. Table no. 33: UG detail


SR. No. Total no. of UGs No. of members

No. of SC/ST/OBC/Other in each category

No. of BPL in each category

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 24 19 - 356

Lend Less 144 94 238 44 53 97 63 32 83 SF 95 23 118 - - - - - -

MF - - - - - - - - - LF - - - - - - - - -

Total 24 19 - 356 239 117 356 44 53 97 63 32 83

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP – 1 Una Cluster project area 4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA)

EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community at the beginning of the project; generally, certain

important works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group Discussion was conducted with watershed Development Committee

regarding the EPA activity, It was conveyed to the WC that an amount of Rs. 20.7092 Lakh was allotted for EPA activity, which was 4 per cent of total allocated budget.

The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only those activities can be taken, which

revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.


Cemetery Check Dam Repairing


Table no.34.1: Entry point activities (EPA) for Itavaya (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

SR.

No. Names of the Village Amount earmarked for EPA Entry Point Activities planned Nos. Estimated cost

1

Itavaya 6.99

R.O Plant 1 0.27

2 Plantion & Bathing Provisionin Cemetery 1 1.53

3 Plantion & Bathing Provisionin Cemetery - Sc 1 0.96

Solar Light 1 0.30

4 Ground Water tank 2 0.94

5 Repairieng Of Animal Water Trough 1 1.26

6 Protection Holl 1 1.73

6.99

Table no.34.2: Entry point activities (EPA) for Dron (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

SR.


1

Dron 6.44

Repairieng Of Over Well 1 1.03


3 Repairieng Of Causeway 2 1.70

4 Repairieng Of Over Head Tank 1 0.28

5 Ground Water tenk 1 0.94

6 Gaushala Repairieng 1 0.52

7 Solar Light 1 0.27

Total : 6.44


Table no.34.3: Entry point activities (EPA) for Fatsar (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

SR.


1

Fatsar 6.41

R.O Plant 2 0.60


3 Solar Light 1 0.30

4 Repairieng Of Balvatika 1 0.75

5 Chek dam Repairieng 1 0.52

6 Ground Water tenk 2 0.94

7 Repairieng Of Animal Water Trough 1 1.08

Total : 6.41

4.3.2. Watershed Development Works: Watershed development works are to be done during second phase of watershed project. A multi-tier ridge to valley sequence approach should be approached towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 50 percent is allotted for this work. Ridge Area Treatment Plans: It is very important to treat the ridge as this is where the major water resources originate. This involves mainly hilly and forest region in IWMP -1 Una Cluster watershed. For the ridge area treatment of IWMP - 1 Una Cluster watershed following structure are been Proposed after interaction between the watershed committee, Range Forest Officer (RFO) and other field staff of forest.


1. Stone Banding 2. Staggered Contour Trenches 3. Border Contour Trenching with Tree plantations 4. Grass seeding 1. Stone Bunding

A bund constructed out of stone along the contour or across the stream is called as stone wall. It is adopted where the water velocity is high and where basically stone of radius 100-150 mm is available. It helps in:

Control of erosion by reducing the slope of the cultivated land Increasing the infiltration of rainwater

Main advantages as compared to the normal contour banding in IWMP – 1 Una Cluster Project are:

IWMP-1 has much steeper slopes The region has shallow soil depth. It is a more permanent structure if well maintained It is self – stabilizing

2. Staggered contour Trenches Trenches are any form of depression or micro pit constructed over the land surface in order to prevent soil erosion and to absorb rainwater in non-arable lands. Trenches are constructed along the contours (called contour trenches) on hill slopes above 15% with vegetative supports for forestry and horticulture land uses. Contour trenches are used both on hill slopes as well as on degraded and barren waste lands for soil and moisture conservation and afforestration purposes. The trenches break the slope and reduce the velocity of surface runoff. It can be used in all slopes irrespective of rainfall conditions (i.e. in both high and low rainfall conditions), varying soil properties. For vegetative support forage grasses as well as economic trees can be planted. Periodical maintenance by way of unearthing of the trenches and depositing on the downhill side ought to be given due attention by the beneficiaries themselves. SCT are been planned to be drawn in the hilly terrain where slope is not so steep.


3. Border Contour Trenching: It is planned to draw a border contour trench with the following specifications (table no.40.4 and 40.5) to collect the runoff below the hills so that plantation of trees can be taken up. Slope treatment: The second tier treatment is the slope treatment. This is generally done on agricultural land or waste land. This generally includes water conservation or surface water storage structures. This being highly labour intensive, will involve more of manual labour; so, funds from National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) can be taken. Following structures are been proposed in these areas a. Earthen Bund b. Waste Weir c. Afforstation

Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

SR.

No.

Name of the

villages

Initiation of

village level

institution

Capacity

building IEC activities

Baseline

survey

Hydro-geological

survey

Identifying

technical

support agencies

Printing DPR

and mapping

of project area

Estimated Cost

(Rs. in lakh)

1 Itavaya 2.80 5.00 0.94 0.20 0.18 0.25 1.12 10.49

ss2 Dron 1.95 5.15 0.95 0.07 0.10 0.15 1.29 9.66

3 Fatsar 2.00 4.35 1.33 0.12 0.15 0.18 1.08 9.21


Table no.36.1: Details of engineering structure to Surface water resources in the project areas Itavaya (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

SR. No.

name of the Village

Type of structures

Proposed target Augmentation/ repair of existing

structures Construction of new structures Total target

No. Area to be irrigated

(Ha.)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(Ha.)

Storage capacity (MtFt)

Estimated cost

Area to be irrigated

(Ha.)

Storage capacity (cumec)

Estimated cost

1 Itavaya

Check dam - - - - 5 125.22 14.44 15.5 125.22 14.44 15.5 ii) Causeway cum check dam

- - - - 6 244.49 15.12 29.50 244.49 15.12 29.50

TOTAL 45.00

Table no.36.2: Details of engineering structure to Surface water resources in the project areas Dron (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

SR. No.

name of the Village

Type of structures




(Ha.)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(Ha.)


Estimated cost


(Ha.)


Estimated cost

1 Dron

(i) Check dam - - - - 5 99.47 8.61 11.93 99.47 8.61 11.93

(ii) Causeway cum check dam

- - - - 8 292.52 18.93 35.20 292.52 18.93 35.20

TOTAL 47.13


Table no.36.3: Details of engineering structure to Surface water resources in the project areas Fatsar (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

SR. No.

name of the Village

Type of structures




(Ha.)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost


(Ha.)


Estimated cost


(Ha.)


Estimated cost

1 Fatsar (i) Check dam - - - - 5 111.56 10.82 13.40 111.56 10.82 13.40 (ii) Causeway cum check dam

- - - - 4 151.19 12.06 18.15 151.19 12.06 18.15

TOTAL 31.55

Table no.37: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh)

Sr. No. Name of Villages Type of structures


recharging structures Construction of New Recharging

Structures Total target

No. Area to be

Irrigated (ha) Estimated Cost No.

Area to be Irrigated (ha)

Estimated Cost Area to be

Irrigated (ha) Estimated Cost

1 Itavaya Percolation Well - - - 17 56.66 6.80 56.66 6.80 2 Dron Percolation Well - - - 12 40 4.80 40 4.80 3 Fatsar Percolation Well - - - 16 53.33 6.40 53.33 6.40

Total for the Project - - - 45 149.99 18 149.99 18


Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas

SR. No. Names of the

Villages

Major activities of the SHGs

Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from activity

per SHG

1 Itavaya Horticultural Plantation 1 1.80

Handy Craft 1 1.30

2 Dron Horticultural Plantation 1 1.60

Handy Craft 1 1.40

3 Fatsar Horticultural Plantation 1 1.90

Handy Craft 1 1.30

Table no. 39: Other Activities of watershed works phase – Project Target

SR. No. Name of the villages Land development Fodder Land

development Total Estimated cost (Rs. In

lakhs) (In Ha.) (in Lakh) (In Ha.) (in Lakh)

1 Itavaya 45 9.00 5.20 5.00 14.00 2 Dron 40.00 8.00 2.30 2.10 10.10 3 Fatsar 55.00 1.00 2.50 2.19 3.19

TOTAL 140.00 18.00 10.00 9.29


Table no.40.1: Details of engineering Activity in watershed works Itavaya

SR. No.

Name of the Village

Name of Activity

Type of treatment Type of land Executing agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land dev.

(L)

(i) Private

(ii) Com munity

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG

(iii)Others (private Person)

(iv)WC

No. of units (No./ cum./

rmt)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of

completion (mm/yyyy) M W O T

1 Itavaya

Waste weir L P Other 34 1.70 Fencing L P Other 6000Rmt 5.00 Land leveling L P Other 45 Ha 9.00 Afforstation C 3.20 Ha 5.00 Farmbunding L P Other 1113Rmt 4.18

TOTAL 20.88 Table no.40.2: Details of engineering Activity in watershed works Dron Dron

SR. No.

Name of the Village

Name of Activity


(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land dev.

(L)

(i) Privat

e

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG

(iii) Others (private person) (iv)WC

No. of units (No./ cum./

rmt)




1 Dron

Farm bunding L P Other 1452.Rmt 1.54 Waste weir P Other 74 3.70 Land leveling L P Other 40 Ha 8.00 Fencing L P Other 4193 Rmt 6.29 Afforstation c 1.80Ha 2.10

TOTAL 21.63


Table no.40.3: Details of engineering Activity in watershed works Fatsar

SR. No.

Name of the Village

Name of Activity


(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Privat

e

(ii) Communit

y

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG

(iii)Others (private person)

(iv)WC

No. of Units

(No./ cum./ rmt)




1 Fatsar

Waste weir L P Other 84 4.20 Land leveling L P Other 55Ha 11.00 Fencing L P Other 4086 Rmt 6.13 Afforstation L P Other 1.80 Ha 2.19

TOTAL 23.52 Table no. 40.5: Technical Details of Check Dam

SR. No Particulars Value Unit

1 Type of check dam CC 1:3:6

2 Length 12 M.

3 Height above the river Bed 2 M.

4 Foundation Depth 1.35 M.

5 Top width 0.60 M.

6 Bottom width 1.00 M.

7 Apron width 3.00 M.

8 Storage Capacity 43,12,500 Lit.

9 Catchment area 0.80 sq.km

10 Discharge 12.00 Cmec

11 Type of river Bank Hart strata


Table no. 40.6: Technical Details of Pala Plug SR. No Particulars Value Unit

1 Type of Nala Plug CC 1:3:6 2 Length 8 M. 3 Height above the river Bed 1.50 M. 4 Foundation Depth 1.00 M. 5 Top width 1.00 M. 6 Bottom width 2.00 M. 7 Apron width 2.00 M. 8 Storage Capacity 6,00,000 Lit. 9 Catchment area 0.50 sq.km

10 Discharge 12.25 Cmec 11 Type of vodka bank Hard strata

Design of Pala plug:

1) Catchment area=0.5 km2

2) HFL = 2.50m

3) Length = 8m

4) Height = 1.50m

Calculation:

V = 2R2/32S 1/2 Where: N = Mining’s constant = 0.03

= 23.5 2/320.01½ R = Height of Flood = 2.5

= 11.41 m/sec S = Slope = 100:1


= 37.46 Feet/sec

Q = 0.8 2 a 2 A6 Where: a = Constant = 29.0402

= 0.8 229.0402 2 0.5 0.9232 b = Constant = 0.9232

= 12.25 cusec A = Catchment area

Length of Nala Plug = 8 m

Top width = 0.552

=0.552

=1.03 m

=1.00 m

Bottom width =

=

= 1.45 m

=2 m

Slope start in upstream = 2 2 top width 2

= 2 2 1.03 2

= 3.14 m

Upstream slope’s end height = 3.1 2top width 2

= 3.1 2 1.46 2

= 3.1 2 1.46 2 1.54


= 6.97 m

Upstream projection =

=

= 0.091 m

Discharge passing through the weir:

Q = C 2 L 2 h 3/2 Where: C = Constant = 3.10

= 3.10 2 821 3/2 L = Length = 8 m

= 24.8 H = 1 m Head over crest

Which h is greater than SPF 12.25 cumec. Hence O.K.



Table no. 40.7: Technical Details of Farm Bund

SR. No. Particulars Value Unit

1 Bund Length 20.96 M.

2 Proposed Area(area of farm) 285 Ha.

3 Total Bund Length For Proposed Area 5975 M.

4 Top Width 0.50 M.

5 Side Slope 1:1

6 Height 1 M.

7 Base Width 1.5 M.

8 Cross-Section of Farm bund 1 SqM.

Table no.40.8: Quantity Excavation for Farm bund

SR. No. Description Unit Quantity

1 Earth Work

Construction of Farm bund (dry of moist) excavation and laying in 15 cm layer, breaking of clods, separating

leaves and small stones, dressing and compaction with sheep foot roller of hand rammer, up to 1.5 meter lift and

50 meter lead.

Cum 14,418

2 Vegetative Work

Sowing of seed on the constructed ridge M 5,975

3 Supply of Stylo/ Dhaman Seed @ 4gm/m in (single line) Kg 23.90


Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works

SR. No.

Name of the

Villages

Name of structure/

work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

Survey No

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

Area (Ha.)

No. of plants

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)


completion (mm/ yyyy)

1 Itavaya

Afforstation R - Others 2.00

2.10 37

Kitchen Gardening Kits

- P C SHG/UG 1.5 1.49

Village Settlement

Horticulture R - SHG/UG 2.10 3.00 56

2 Dron

Afforstation R - Others 2.5 2.50 118

Kitchen Gardening Kits

- P C SHG/UG 1.60 2.00

Village Settlement

Horticulture R - SHG/UG 2.00 3.30 118

3 Fatsar

Afforstation R - Others 2.00 1.30 4/1 Kitchen

Gardening Kits - P C SHG/UG 2.5 2.00

Village Settlement

Horticulture R - SHG/UG 2.5 3.00 120 Total 20.9


Table no.42.1: Details of allied / other activities for itavaya

SR. No.

Name of the

village Name of activity

Type of land Executing

agency Target

Survey No

(i) Private (ii) Community (iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of completion

(mm/yyyy) 1 Itavaya Livelihood intervention

Kitchen Garden kit Private SHG/UG 10 Village Settlement

Horticulture Plantation Community SHG/UG 15 120

Animal Husbandry Private SHG/UG 15 Village Settlement

Mandap Sarvis Unit Community SHG/UG 1 Village Settlement

Flour Mil Community SHG/UG 1 Village Settlement

Floriculther Community SHG/UG 2 Village Settlement

Senting Private SHG/UG 1 102,103

Parlor Kits Private 3 Village Settlement

Handicraft Community SHG/UG 4 Village Settlement


Micro-enterprise Activities

Bend Party Community 1.5

Buffalo Farming Community SHG/UG 3.25 Village Settlement

D.J System Community SHG/UG 3 Village Settlement

Sound System Community SHG/UG 1.5 Village Settlement

SHG Revolving Fund Community 1 Village Settlement

Fabrication Work Community SHG/UG 3 Village Settlement

Scientific Approach for Agro Productivity Community 2 Village Settlement

Papad Making Unit Community SHG/UG 1.1 Village Settlement

Vanat Unit Community SHG/UG 2.73 Village Settlement

Vefar Making Unit Community SHG/UG 1.5 Village Settlement

Veterinary Camp Community SHG/UG 1.8 Village Settlement

Drip irrigation Demonstration Community SHG/UG 1.1 Village Settlement

Community SHG/UG Village Settlement


Table no.42.2: Details of allied / other activities for Dron

SR. No. Name of the

village Name of activity

Type of land Executing agency Target Survey No (i) Private (ii) Community (iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG



completion (mm/yyyy)

1 Dron LIVELIHOOD INTERVENTION


Horticulture Plantation Community SHG/UG 3.3 118

Animal Husbandry Private SHG/UG 3 Village Settlement

Flory coulter Community SHG/UG 1.7 Village Settlement

Parlor Kits Private SHG/UG 0.3 Village Settlement

Handicraft Community SHG/UG 0.4 42,79

Derry Unit Community SHG/UG 4.8 Village Settlement

Micro-enterprise Activities Poultry Farm Community SHG/UG 3 Village

Settlement


Senting Community SHG/UG 1.43 Village Settlement

Buffalo Farming Community SHG/UG 8 Village Settlement

SHG Revolving Fund Community SHG/UG 1 Village Settlement

Fabrication Work Community SHG/UG 2.7 Village Settlement

Veterinary Kits Community SHG/UG 1 Village Settlement


Drip Kits Community 2.1 Village Settlement

Table no.42.3: Details of allied / other activities for Fatsar

SR. No.

Name of the village

Name of activity

Type of land Executing

agency Target

Survey No

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG/UG

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of completion

(mm/yyyy) 1 Fatsar LIVELIHOOD INTERVENTION



Horticulture Plantation Community SHG/UG 3 120

Animal Husbandry Community 3

Bakery Unit Community 2

Floriculther Private Community SHG/UG 0.85 Village Settlement

Xerox mashing Community SHG/UG 1.3 Village Settlement

Parlor Kits Community SHG/UG 30 Village Settlement

Bend Party Community SHG/UG 1 102,103

Senting Community 1 Village Settlement

Mandap Sarvis Unit Community 1 Village Settlement

Micro-enterprise Activities

Poultry Farm Community SHG/UG 1.5 Village Settlement

Bakery Unit Community SHG/UG 2 Village Settlement

Handi Craft Community 0.5 Village Settlement

SHG Revolving Fund Community SHG/UG 1 Village Settlement


Groundnut Grading Unit Community 9.5 Village Settlement

Fabrication Work Community 1.44 Village Settlement

Shutting Shirting Community SHG/UG 1 Village Settlement


Drip irrigation Demonstration Community SHG/UG 1.20 Village Settlement

Scientific Approach for Agro

Productivity

Community SHG/UG 2 Village Settlement

Livelihood Intervention

Promotion of micro-enterprises and various income generation activities is an important aspect of empowerment. Although it is extremely difficult to find remunerative self

employment, there are enormous untapped opportunities in the rural sector. These include both on-farm and off-farm opportunities. Typically families living below poverty line, SC,

ST and landless in a cluster of villages are motivated to take part in holistic development through livelihood opportunities through multidisciplinary interventions.

Advantages of Agro-Based Activities: While promoting various income generation activities, agro-based activities have advantages because of the following reasons:

1. Target groups are acquainted with most of the basic skills.

2. Easy access to inputs.

3. No problems of marketing, as most of the outputs are locally consumed as food.

4. As over 50-60 % of the rural families own land and livestock, income generation activities can be initiated immediately without heavy capital investment.


5. Risk of failure due to improper technology, poor quality, low demand and poor price recovery are very low. Hence, the chances of success are high.

6. Infrastructure required for promotion of on-farm activities has been very well established. Hence, the entrepreneurs can progress even in backward regions, which are deprived of

regular power supply and electronic information connectivity. It is therefore advantageous to tap all the opportunities to promote various on-farm activities. The experience has

confirmed that the best strategy to promote income generation activities through SHGs is to analyze the on-going agro-based activities undertaken by the members and introduce

suitable interventions to enhance the production. There are also excellent opportunities to improve post production management of the produce through grading, storage, processing

and marketing.

Various micro-enterprises activities through UG and Self Help Groups will be promoted. The list of micro-enterprises taken up by various SHGs is presented below. Among these

activities, agriculture followed by animal husbandry, however, over a period of time, agriculture, animal husbandry and food processing supersede the trade as many individuals

participate in enhancing their production at the family level and try to organize them to market them collectively. Other activities such as production of utility items, construction

related activities, handicrafts and Moti work find it difficult to sustain due to poor marketing infrastructure, lack market and competition from other sources.

Support Needed for Promotion of Micro-enterprises

Following support is needed to promote micro-enterprises through women SHGs.

1. Motivation of the target communities, particularly women and landless farmers

2. Formation of Self Help Groups and their Federations

3. Gender sensitization

4. Training and capacity building

5. Micro-finance. Provision of credit facilities and linkage with banks


6. Development of infrastructure, particularly through the SHG Federations to provide necessary support services and marketing

7. Trade networking and establishment of market outlets

8. Village level Information Centre: The multi-disciplinary team interacted with the SHGs and User groups to explore the potentials for development of various enterprises and extend

necessary support for dissemination of technologies, procurement of inputs, and training of members and establishment of linkage with the market. There should be some agency to

provide guidance to the entrepreneurs as and when needed.

The selected production activities for the watershed villages follow the above-mentioned process, and are selected in such a way that they should be:

economically viable

environmentally sustainable

socially equitable

energy efficient

employment generation

Production System-1: Papad production units

For women to become a successful entrepreneur, she needs access to capital, technical and managerial know-how and market. The essence to empower rural women lies in catalyzing

appropriate economic activities at the grass root level and creating new opportunities for them to earn higher income in order to improve their standard of living. This objective could

be accomplished by establishing enterprises that are based on the locally available resources and preferably indigenous knowledge. Self Help Groups (SHG), each with 10-20 members,

will be motivated and proper training will be provided for each micro enterprise activity which will improve the quality of their own lives as well as the lives of those around them.

Introduction


Papad is delicious snack. It is consumed at homes, restaurants, hotels, etc. Papad is a traditional item consumed in all functions. Traditionally this activity was confined to

household papad making but in view of increasing demand and availability of machinery (mechanization) it has now been developed in cottage and small scale sector. Enterprise can

be started by 2 family members and optimum machinery.

Market

Field survey findings indicated that papad industry has good potential in big centers in cities Junagadh. There is a good demand for papads because it is a food product and

commonly consumed commodity in all households and hotels. Women entrepreneurs can gainfully take up this papad unit in their houses but proper packing and distribution network

is necessary to sell in bulk quantities.

Manufacturing Process

Generally weighed quantity of floor is taken in a mixer. A solution of common salt and carbonates is added in requisite quantity of water and the contents are needed at maximum

speed to get a homogenous lump of the dough. After resting the dough for 30 minutes, it is divided into balls. These are pressed into circular discs. Corn starch can be used as dusting

material to prevent stickiness. The papads are usually dried. After drying, it is packed in various size packing. Lot of 25 or 50 papads is then packed in polythene bags. Papad can be

manufactured from different varieties of pulses or there could be a combination of pulses as well. Ingredients required for Papad making are Black gram, oil, sodium carbonate, flour of

Arhar dal.


Process flow chart of Papad making

Production Capacity

Monthly approximately 250 kg papad can be produced.

Static Capital Investments:

Dough formation from various ingredients

Making small balls from dough

Pressing

Sun Drying

Sealing and Packing


A) Land/Infrastructure : A person can start his activity in his own house by using Approx. 150 Sq. Ft. carpet area.

B) Plant/Machinery/Instruments etc.

Sr.

No.

Particular Nos. Price (Rs.)

B) Plant/Machinery/Instruments etc.

1 Flour Mill with electric motor 1 17000.00

2 Set for Papad making 1000.00

3 Other instruments 1000.00

4 Installation, foundation etc. 3000.00

Total : - 22000.00

C) Office Furniture etc.

1 Cup board 2700.00

D) Capital Investment

Raw Material and wages of labour 3500.00

Grand Total :- 28200.00


Production Cost (Monthly)

1 Raw Material 3500.00

2 Power fuel charge 300.00

3 Packing 150.00

4 Depreciation Cost 200.00

5 Repair, Storage etc. 100.00

6 House Rent 300.00

7 Others 200.00

Total : - 4750.00

Total Production (Monthly)

1. Papad 250 gm X Rs. 32/Kg 8000

Cost Benefit Ratio (Monthly)

Monthly Selling income 8000

Production Cost 4750

--------------------

Total monthly income will be Rs. 3250 3250


The unit can be taken up by landless, small farmer and land with limited farm labour, thus making it most suitable to the project villages, and the scheme will be taken up in such a

manner that there should be no marketing problem, as they will be consumed directly by the nearby villages or cities. Training will be provided to the beneficiaries and the content is

shown below

Training Content

A. Theoretical

• Introduction to different types of papads.

• Tools and Equipments used in papad making.

• Dough making - variations in shapes, size, and flavor.

• The processes involved in papads making.

• The hygiene aspects associated with food products.

• Market development.

• Addresses of the suppliers of raw materials, & packaging materials.

B. Practical

• Raw materials for papad making – the quality and variety.


• Introduction to the machinery and equipments used.

• Dough making and the value addition in the form of flavors.

• Bringing about variations in shapes and sizes.

• Papad & Chips making – Practical

• Drying and preservation

• Cost considerations and waste reduction.

• Pricing & packaging

Production System – 3: Handicraft unit

Usefulness:

Today in fast life there is so much demand of handicraft work, so micro-enterprises provide facility to create handicraft work, at one place only, so that we

must give importance to micro-enterprises for handicraft work. It planned that a handicraft unit by another SHG would be supported by this project.

Process:

To start handicraft unit, we should have row material like

Moti Colour Leather Wood


Velvet Thread Decorative Mirror Sparkle Cotton Finical

We can create more attractive handicraft items to be using our new creative ideas.

Production: We should create some items like...

Flower vase Moti work Anklet Show pies Bracelet Dust cleaner Candles Curtain Wall pies Wood work Batic/Bandhani/Vegetable Print Hanging pies

Monthly Production Expenditure: Table No. :42.10 Monthly Production Expenditure

SR. No. Expenses Rs.

1 Velvet 2000

2 Colour 500

3 Thread 500

4 Moti 2000

5 Decorative mirror 500

6 Finical 200

7 Cotton 200


8 Ribbin 200

9 Wood 1000

10 Sparkle 200

Total Production Expenses : 8600

Total Sales:

You can create Batic / Bandhani / Vegetable Print, Wall pies, Candles, Bracelet, Anklet, Flower vase, Moti work, Show pies, Dust cleaner, Curtain, Wood

Work, Hanging show pies etc. monthly sales of creativity of handy craft items is 13000 Approximately.

Net Profit : Table No. 42.11 Net Profits:

Total sales per month 13000 Rs.

- Monthly Production Expenditure 8600 Rs.

Net Profit per month: 4400 Rs.

Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities focused group discussions (FGDs) was held with the women, which came up with the following

observations:


Production System - 4: Groundnuts Packaging

Groundnut is an important crop of the area. Though very few farmers produce groundnut in the village, there is ample scope for groundnut cultivation in

the village as demonstrated by a leading farmer who owns a fresh water open-well and can irrigate his fields. With availability of good quality ground water due to the

watershed activities, many a farmer can cultivate groundnut as Junagadh district has a high productivity of groundnut. This groundnut can be cleaned, graded and

packed at the village level to fetch better price in the market.


Equipment like Theresa machine etc. Will be provided after training. Groundnut seeds can be packaged in polythene bags of various sizes according to the

market demand.

1. Grading of groundnut: Grading of groundnut seed will be done according to size of cumin seed and moisture content.

2. Packaged in polythene bags of various sizes (5kg, 10kg, 20kg, and 40kg) according to the market demand.

3. The bags should be sealed to prevent moisture entering ct.

4. Labeling of it with following information the name of the product, brand name (if appropriate), details of the

Manufacturer (name and address), date of manufacture, expiry date, weight of the contents

4.4. Capacity Building: Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain the insights, knowledge and experience needed to solve problems and implement change. There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of development interventions by going beyond the conventional development targets and measures of success (e.g. in the form of commodities, goods and services) to take into account improvements to human potential. Capacity building of stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in developmental projects that involve participation of stakeholders at all levels for effective implementation of projects. Scope of capacity building at IWMP-1 Una

Scientific Approach for agro productivity Training Training for youth(Ex. Stitching, beauty parlor, computer) Batik, Bandhani, Block Printing Visit & Training Farm-Machinery repairing training Seasonal Activities Training for Sauce, jam, Pickle, Jelly


Income Generation Activities Stitching Handicraft

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas

SR. No. Name of the

Project CPR particulars Activity proposed

Target

Target area under the activity (ha)

Estimated expenditure (Rs.)

Expected no. of beneficiaries

Horticulture Plantation 7 10 26

1 IWMP-1 Afforstation 7 6 31

Table no. 44: Institutes Identified for Capacity Building

Sr. No

Organization

Training Modules

1

Junagadh Agriculture University Soil Conversation

2

Krushi Vegan Kendra, Junagadh Better Farming practices 3 SPIPA Implementation and Monitoring of Watershed Project

4 Anode Foundation Community based activities

5 BAIF Micro Enterprise planning

6 IRMA Sustainable Livelihood Governance, Natural Resources Management

7 BISAG, Gandhinagar GIS In Planning

8 AKRSP,I Participatory Methods in Planning and Implementation of Watershed Project

Early and ongoing stakeholder collaboration and communication in capacity building is also important from the point viewpoint of “leveling the

playing field” in anticipation of disputes that may arise. Filling strategic skills/capacity gaps supports integrated water resources management, facilitates dispute

resolution, and builds practical understanding of the scope of sustainable natural resource development challenges and opportunities.


Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:

SR. No. Name of the

Project Project Stakeholders

Total no. of persons

No. of persons to be trained

No. of training programmes Estimated cost

1

IWMP-1

PIA 10 10 2 40000 WDTs 7 7 3 45000

UGs 61 61 6 200000 SHGs 114 110 9 470000 WCs 50 50 5 180000

Community 60 60 3 110000 Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities:

SR. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.) Outcome

(may quantify, wherever possible) 1 Street Plays Local Drama Groups 8000

Awareness for the importance of watershed project

2 Video Shows IWMP-1 10000 3 Pamphlets and posters IWMP-1 15000 4 Banners, Hoardings IWMP-1 15000 5 FGD IWMP-1 8000 6 Wall Painting IWMP-1 25000


BUDGETING

CHAPTER - 5


Budgeting

The first step in budgeting is dividing the cost of the project into various components as detailed in the common guidelines and done accordingly in table no.

47. It helps us in further identifying activities under different components and allocate appropriate funds.

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project

SR.

No. Budget component itavaya Dron Fatsar Cost requirement

NET PROJECT COST 17490000 16101600 15354000 48945600

1 Administrative costs 1749000 1610160 1535400 4894560

2 Monitoring 174900 161016 153540 489456

3 Evaluation 174900 161016 153540 489456

PREPARATORY PHASE :

4 Entry Point activity 699600 644064 614160 1957824

5 Institution and Capacity Building 874500 805080 767700 2447280

6 Detailed Project Report 174900 161016 153540 489456

WATERSHED WORK PHASE :

7 Watershed Development Works 8745000 8050800 7677000 24472800

8 Livelihood activities for asset less 1749000 1610160 1535400 4894560

9 Production systems and micro-Enterprises 2273700 2093208 1996020 6362928

10 Consolidation phase 874500 805080 767700 2447280

TOTAL 17490000 16101600 15354000 48945600


Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP

SR no


Activity

EPA Institution

and CB DPR

Watershed development

Work

Livelihood for asset less

Production system and Microenterprises

Consolidation Total

1

Itavay 699600 874500 174900 8745000 1749000 2273700 874500 15391200

2

Dron 644064 805080 161016 8050800 1610160 2093208 805080 14169408

3

Fatsar 614160 767700 153540 7677000 1535400 1996020 767700 13511520

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement

SR. No Name of the Villages Total cost requirement Total funds available under IWMP Gap in funds requirement

1 Itavay 18462000 17490000 972000

2 Dron 17035600 16101600 934000

3 Fatsar 16202000 15354000 848000

Total 51699600 48945600 2754000


Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP-1 with other Schemes

SR. No. Name of the Villages Activity to be carried

out

Fund made available to IWMP

due to convergence (Rs. in lakh)

Scheme with which convergence took

place Reference no. of activity/ task/

structure in DPR

Level at which decision for

convergence was taken

1 Itavay Land Levelling 6.32

NREGA - District Level

Farm Banding 3.40


2 Dron Land Levelling 6.21 NREGA - District Level

Farm Banding 3.13 NREGA - District Level

3 Fatsar Land Levelling 6.10


Farm Banding 2.38


Total 27.54


EXPECTED OUT COMES

CHAPTER - 6


6.1 Expected Outcomes 6.1.1 Employment Employment has always been a problem in the village. The principal occupations of the people are dry land agriculture, animal husbandry and casual labor

work. However, rain fall being very limited and erratic, agriculture suffers, i.e. at best they can take only a single crop, which keeps them partially engaged for about 4

months. Lack of fodder makes animal husbandry very difficult too. So, animal husbandry does not keep them engaged full time. Thus the people mainly depend upon

casual labor, either in the village itself or outside it.

The project plans for creation of both wage employment and self-employment opportunities. Wage employment would be created by engaging people in

watershed physical works like construction of earthen bunds, farm bunds, Check dam, village pond, plantation, etc. Self-employment would be created by providing the

people with cash support in the form of direct livelihood activities like agriculture, animal husbandry and enterprise development.

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area:

S.

NO.

Names of the

Villages

Wage employment Self-employment

No. of man-days No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST OBC Others Women Total SC ST OBC Others Women Total SC ST Others OBC Women Total

1 Itavay 400 90 1200 600 700 2990 54 8 70 35 23 190 54 8 70 35 23 190

2 Dron 120 200 850 540 720 2430 25 39 80 80 53 277 25 39 80 80 53 277

3 Fatsar 300 520 980 354 9700 11854 36 97 452 356 482 1423 36 97 452 356 482 1423


6.1.2. Migration

Low rainfall results in very little fodder availability in the locality. The relatively well-off farmers bring fodder from Junagadh (approximately 42 kms away)

collectively; but the resource poor cannot afford it. On account of agriculture and animal husbandry providing only part time employment for some part of the year, the

people migrate for a better half of the year for wage labour.

Employment opportunities in the local area as mentioned above will ensure lessening seasonal migration from the area.

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area

SR. No. Names of the villages

No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project

1 Itavaya 369 200 223 196

2 Dron 300 225 315 256

3 Fatsar 424 350 415 300

6.1.3 Ground water table

Rainfall has been scanty but demand for ground water has been increasing all the time. The ground water table thus has depleted over the years. Presently

it stands at 28 m.

Proper water harvesting structures and percolation tanks would go a long way in increasing water table depth from 28 m in the pre-project level to 25 m in

the post project period.


Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)

SR. No. Name of the Project Sources Pre-Project level Expected Increase/decrease

(Post- Project)

1 IWMP-1 Percolation Well 10 8

6.1.4 Drinking water The village has wells and tube well on which they depend for their drinking water, but their ground water table is to Profound Many an effort at finding

sweet water at different other places in the same village has failed. IWMP-5 construction many check dam and farm bund to try ground water depth increased.

As a result of the watershed activities, it is expected that the quantity and quality of drinking water would improve.

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water

SR.

No.

Names of the

Villages

Availability of drinking water

(no. of months in a year) Quality of drinking water

Comments

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project

1 Itavay 11 12 Well Well -

2 Dron 10 12 Well Well -

3 Fatsar 10 12 Well Well -

6.1.5 Crops


Agriculture primarily depends upon water; but this is what is lacking in IWMP-1 The surface water is scanty due to low rainfall and ground water is saline,

which is unfit for crop production.

All this can change with the integrated land and water management during the watershed project. The planned earthen bunds check dam, farm bund, is

storage the sweet rain water and also help percolate sweet water underground, and preserve some moisture in the soil. This will help in additional area coming under

cultivation and increasing productivity too. The farmers can take more than one season of crops. Different varieties of crops can be taken.

Table no. 56: Details of crop area and yield in the project area

Name of the

Project Name of crops

Pre-project Expected Post-project

Area

(Ha.) Average Yield (Kg.) per Ha.

Area

(Ha.)

Average Yield per Ha.

(Kg.)

IWMP-1

Kharif

Groundnut 610.0. 635 750 700

Cotton 306.47 1640 350 725

Rabi

Wheat 368.96 1700 450 1900

Onion 151.68 8400 200 9000

Pearl millet 67.22 2900 100 3100

Zaid

Till 90.92 425 200 500

6.1.6 Horticulture Table no. 57: Area under horticulture


SR. No. Name of the Project Existing area under horticulture (Ha.) Area under horticulture proposed to be covered

through IWMP Ha.

1 IWMP-1 24.5 45

6.1.7 Vegetative cover

There is negligible area under tree cover. The village has a forest area of 66ha which consists of only Sag, Seasam.

It is planned that 10 ha land to be covered under new plantation.

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover

SR. No. Name of the Project Existing area under tree cover (Ha.) Area under tree cover proposed

1 IWMP-1 49.2 45

6.1.8 Livestock

IWMP-1 Una has quite a good of livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats, and sheep. The interventions like provision of good

quality cows and buffaloes, the establishment of a fodder bank and other such related activities would spur up the dairy development in the village. It is expected that

the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population and yield from them.


Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in liters, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)

SR. No. Name of the

Project Type of Animal

Pre-Project Expected Post-project Remarks

No. Yield Income No. Yield Income

IWMP-1

Una

Cow (Milk: Rs/lit.) 617 9671 116052 900 11000 15000 -

Buffalo (Milk: Rs/lit.) 448 7950 135150 800 9000 15000 -

Draught Purpose animal

Goat (Meat: Rs/kg.) 163 419 6285 270 620 9000 -

Sheep (Meat: Rs/kg.) 265 480 5760 400 510 10000 -

6.1.9 Linkages

The direct livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to deliver the desired results.

These machinery, input supply, marketing, etc.

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages

SR. No. Name of the

Project Type of Marketing Facility

Pre-project

(no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)

1 IWMP-1

Una

Backward linkages - - -

Seed certification - - -

Seed supply system - 1 1

Fertilizer supply system 1 - 1

Pesticide supply system 1 - 1

Credit institutions - 1 1

Water supply - - -

Extension services - KVK KVK


Price Support system - - -

Labour - - -

Any other (please specify) - - -

Forward linkages

Harvesting/threshing machinery 9 Harvesting/Machinery(3) 12

Floor mill unit 4 2 6

Handicraft unit - 3 3

Vegetable shop 2 1 3

Soda Processing unit - Soda Processing unit (2) 2

Agro and other Industries - Groundnut/

Processing/packaging

1

Milk and other collection centers - Milk collection centre-1 1

Mandap Service 2 3 5

Any other (please specify) - Fodder bank-1 1

Vermin-Compost unit - Vermin-Compost unit-1 2


Logical Framework Analysis

Components Activities Output Effect Impact Village Institution Formation

Formation of Watershed Committee, User Group

One Watershed Committee each village

Number of User group depending on

the coverage of particular intervention

Project can be implemented and managed in a democratic and participatory way ensuring equity.

Unity and prosperity in the village management.

People's Participation

and positive perception towards the programme

Strengthening Village Institutions

Organize training and awareness programme for Village institutions

Capacity building workshops and

exposure visits User Group and Watershed Committee

Facilitating and monitoring the

functioning of UGs and WCs Strengthen linkages between UGs and

WCs and Panchayat Institutions. Gender sensitization of UGs and WCs to

increase inclusiveness of collective decision-making.

Sensitize village communities to involve children and youth in development.

Awareness camps to be organized. trainings and exposure visits UGs

and WCs to be held Capacity building workshops to be

organized 1 Federations of UGs and WC to be

formed.

Quality of management of common resources improved.

Quality of distribution of

benefits between people improved.

Increased awareness

amongst women about village resources.

Women participation in

micro enterprise Involvement of youth and

children in village development increased.


Fund Management

Improve management and utilization of UGs and WCs.

Prepare communities to explore other

sources of income for UGs and WCs.

UGs and WCs operating bank account and managing resources on their own

Purpose, frequency and volume of use of the fund enhanced.

Volume of funds generated

for UGs and WCs from other sources of income increased.

Ecological Restoration

Protection, treatment and regeneration of common and private lands

Protection, treatment and regeneration of

forest lands Plantation of fruits and forest species Impart trainings, conduct meetings and

organize exposure visits for communities, village volunteers and staff to effectively plan, execute and monitor activities

Identification and promotion of non-

timber forest produce based income generation activities

Common and private lands to be brought under new plantations and agro-horty forestry like Amala, Mango, Alovera.

Forest lands to be brought under new plantations and protection

Trainings, exposure visits and

meetings to be organized for communities, village volunteers and staff

Income generation intervention promoted.

Fodder availability from common and private lands increased

Accessibility to common and

forest lands increased with removal of encroachments and resolution of conflicts.

Better Ecological order in the area

Increase in the

proportion of households having more security of fodder

Reduction in drudgery

of fodder and fuel collection, especially women


Rainfed Area Development

Treatment of land through improved soil and moisture conservation practices on watershed basis

Promotion of good agricultural practices-

horticulture, improved crop and vegetable Promotion of organic farming practices

Formation of Fodder banks to increase

fodder security and promote dairy development among communities

Identification and promotion of agri-

produce based income generation activities like grading, processing and packaging.

Promotion of better Irrigation practices

like drip irrigation Impart trainings, conduct meetings and

Land to be brought under improved soil moisture conservation practices.

Good agricultural practices to be

promoted. Organic farming to be promoted. Fodder banks to be established. Agriculture based livelihood income

generation activities to be promoted.

Water harvesting structures to be constructed.

Drip Irrigation facilities to be

distributed among farmers. Approx 15000 person days of

employment to be generated.

Improved productivity of treated land.

Increased availability of

water in wells . Increase in annual

agriculture production. Farmers adopt organic

farming practices. Fodder security of farmers

enhanced.

Increase availability of

water for 9 to 12 months. Increased availability of

water for livestock. Availability of irrigation

water established.

Increase in proportion of households having more security of food

Increase in contribution

of agricultural income to the household income


organize exposure visits of communities, village volunteers and staff to effectively plan, execute and monitor activities

Trainings, exposure visits and

meetings to be organized for communities, village volunteers and staff.

Farmers take three crops in a year.

Increase in agricultural productivity of land

Availability of drinking water enhanced

Women’s Socio-political and economic empowerment

Formation & Strengthening of women’s SHG groups

Capacity building of women Groups Capacity building of SHG leaders and

accountants Linking SHGs with external financial

institutions

Women’s SHG groups to be formed.

Federation of Women’s SHGs to be

formed. Trainings to be conducted for

register maintaining and preparation of

Animal husbandry.

Enhanced capacities of leaders of women's group in taking initiatives to solve problems at different levels.

Improved access to credit

for livelihood purposes. Increased household

income.

Position of women in household, community, society (politically, socially and economically) as perceived by women and community at large

Performance enhancement of SHGs in terms of participation, decision-making, leadership and fund management.

Equality & Equity in

gender relations at home (decision making, expenditure, children’s education, health)


Q U A L I T Y A N D S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y I S S U E S

CHAPTER -7


7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation

A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases. The system would be

available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over

the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained

village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is

being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders

know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system

would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of

the treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy

of the project.

Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground staff alias WDTs

(Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up official in charge of the project can obtain

information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument

marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During the works

phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the

progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of time.

7.2 Plans for Project management:


The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organization and the village level

institutes .In IWMP - Una Cluster, watershed committee and various user groups have been formulated for post project operation and maintenance of assets created

during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during

project period with various institutes and capacity building organization. They will act as a major kingpin during post implementation for scaling up the successful

experience during project.

7.3 Watershed Development Fund:

The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it will comes mainly fund

the following:

7.4 User Charges:

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed during the formation of

user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary of watershed committee (WC) shall maintain the records of

the following.


CHAPTER -8

MAPS











Documents

DETAIL PROJECT REPORT - Gujarat State Portalgswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2009-10/Junagadh/Jun_IWMP_1.pdf · The project area is nearby world famous wild Gir area. His also famous