33
Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium Feb 2016

Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

  • Upload
    hahanh

  • View
    222

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance

Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology

University of California San Francisco

EIP Symposium Feb 2016

Page 2: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Why do some people respond to therapeutic proteins?

•  Characteristics of the protein –  Conformation, post-translational modifications, etc

•  Features of the host –  Genes that influence immune activation vs tolerance:

largely unknown –  The immune “background” of the host –  Defective control/tolerance mechanisms

•  Environmental factors

Page 3: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Critical questions

•  Requirements for antibody response to a protein

•  Why do some individuals produce antibodies when exposed to a “self” protein? –  Why does tolerance to the protein fail?

•  How can tolerance be restored?

•  What assays need to be developed to better understand the loss and restoration of tolerance?

Page 4: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Ac#vatedBcellsdifferen#ate

intoan#body-secre#ngplasmacells

Prolifera#on

NaiveBcell

MicrobeAc#vatedBcell

HelperTcells,others#muli

IgG

Antibody production: activation of B cells

Page 5: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Naïve T cells: Can recognize antigen but

incapable of any functions

APC

+ antigen

Differentiation

+ an

tige

n

CD4+ helper T cells

CD8+ CTLs

Cytokine secretion

Cell killing

Effector T cells

T cell responses

Proliferation

Page 6: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

6

Sites of microbe entry: skin, GI tract, airways (organs with continuous epithelia, populated with dendritic cells). Less often -- colonized tissues, blood Sites of lymphocyte activation: peripheral lymphoid organs (lymph nodes, spleen), mucosal and cutaneous lymphoid tissues

Antigens and T cells come together in the same organs

Capture and presentation of antigens by dendritic cells

Abbas, Lichtman and Pillai. Basic Immunology, 5th edition, 2016, Elsevier

Page 7: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Schematic model of T cell recognition of antigen: what antigens do T cells see

MHC molecules are the peptide display molecules of the immune system Human MHC: HLA (human leukocyte antigens)

Page 8: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

HLA molecules

•  Most polymorphic genes in biology (many variants – alleles – in the population) –  Each of us inherits different combinations of

alleles –  Each HLA variant can display many (but not all)

peptides; hence, individuals may display different peptides and respond to different antigens

•  Two major classes: –  Class I MHC molecules bind to CD8 –  Class II MHC molecules bind to CD4

Page 9: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Multiple possibleepitopes CD4+

T cell

Immunodominant epitope

Processing generates multiple peptides,

one of which can bind to class II allele

T cells respond to

immunodominant peptide epitope

Antigen processing

Internalization of antigeninto APC

Each HLA molecule presents a limited number of peptides

Page 10: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Costimulation: the second signal for T lymphocyte activation

Costimulation: signal(s) in addition to antigen that are needed to stimulate adaptive immune responses Costimulators are induced on APCs by microbes and by adjuvants administered in vaccines Self antigens and other harmless substances fail to induce costimulators, do not elicit immune reactions and may induce tolerance

Page 11: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Role of costimulation in T cell activation

Abbas, Lichtman and Pillai. Basic Immunology, 5th edition, 2016 c Elsevier

Page 12: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

APC TCR

Naïve T cell

Immunogenic antigen

(microbe, vaccine)

Tolerogenic antigen (e.g.

self)

Effector and memory cells

Tolerance: functional inactivation or cell death, or sensitive to suppression

Antigen (peptide + HLA): signal 1

Costimulation (signal 2)

Costimulation determines the choice of activation vs tolerance

Page 13: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

0

100000

200000

300000

400000

500000

0 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 0

100000

200000

300000

400000

500000

0 0.001 0.01 0.1 1

Naïve CD4 T cells Memory CD4 T cells

Prolifer

ation

(CPM

)

Antigen (µg/ml)

Naïve T cells are more dependent on B7 costimulation than are memory cells

wild type (normal; positive control) B7.1/2-/- None (negative control)

APCs

Page 14: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Costimulation

•  Required for initiating T cell responses (activation of naïve T cells)

•  Ensures that T cells respond to microbes (the most potent inducers of costimulators) and not to harmless antigens

–  Source of costimulation during responses to tumors, transplants, proteins given without adjuvants ?

•  Memory cells are less dependent on costimulation than are naïve T cells

Page 15: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Possible host determinants of antibody responses to a biological

•  Size of antigen-specific T cell pool –  Pre-existing pool of naïve T cells –  High number of memory cells induced by cross-

reactive environmental antigens

•  Inheritance of HLA alleles that present the antigen –  Unlikely to be a key issue in an outbred population

(many different HLA alleles present)

•  High level of costimulation –  Source? Unlikely to be provided by antigen itself –  Activation state of dendritic cells?

Page 16: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Exploiting absence of costimulation to inhibit immune responses

•  Costimulatory blockade (blocking B7-CD28, CD40 pathways)

•  Peptide administration (repeated low doses,

modeled after desensitization for allergies) –  Peptide-coupled PBLs (spleen cells in mice)

Page 17: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Activation

Normal: reactions against pathogens

Tolerance, regulation

No response to self and other harmless antigens

The immunological equilibrium: balancing lymphocyte activation and control

Page 18: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Where is tolerance induced?

Central tolerance Peripheral tolerance

Page 19: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Best defined mechanisms of peripheral T cell tolerance

•  Engagement of inhibitory receptors

•  Suppression by regulatory T cells (Tregs)

Page 20: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Inhibitory receptors of the immune system

•  One mechanism by which the system maintains a balance between activation and inhibition is to use different receptors for different outcomes

•  Inhibitory receptors are present in NK cells, T cells and B cells –  Best defined activating and inhibitory

receptors of T cells are members of the CD28 family

Page 21: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

21

APC TCR

CD28

Naïve T cell

B7

B7-CD28 interaction

B7-CTLA-4 interaction

CTLA-4

Proliferation, differentiation

Functional inactivation

The opposing functions of CD28 and CTLA-4

Knockout of CTLA-4 in mice and mutation in humans results in immune dysregulation (lymphoproliferation, multi-organ inflammation)

Page 22: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

The landscape of T cell activating and inhibitory receptors

TIGIT

Page 23: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Engaging inhibitory receptors for inducing tolerance

•  Can inhibitory immune receptors be

triggered to shut off immune responses? –  Problem of reliably producing agonistic

antibodies against cellular receptors

•  Blocking inhibitory receptors has revolutionized cancer immunotherapy –  “Checkpoint blockade” stimulates anti-tumor

immune responses

Page 24: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Regulatory T cells

Abbas, Lichtman and Pillai. Cellular and Molecular Immunology, 8th edition, 2014, Elsevier

CD4+, high CD25 (IL-2 receptor), Foxp3 transcription factor

Page 25: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

The significance of Foxp3+ Tregs

•  Genetic evidence: Foxp3 mutations --> autoimmune disease (IPEX); in mice, disease can be corrected by providing normal Foxp3+ cells

•  Do defects in Foxp3+ Tregs or resistance to Treg-mediated suppression contribute to common autoimmune diseases? –  Inconsistent and variable data –  By definition, any abnormal immune response

reflects an imbalance of activation vs control

Page 26: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

The therapeutic potential of regulatory T lymphocytes

•  Cell transfer of autologous Tregs to

suppress immune responses –  Grow up patient’s Tregs ex vivo –  Ongoing clinical trials in graft rejection, T1D

show it is safe –  Very little efficacy data

Page 27: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

The therapeutic potential of regulatory T lymphocytes

•  Cell transfer of autologous Tregs to suppress immune responses

•  Challenges: –  Technically difficult, individualized

•  Administer antigen or antigen mimic in

ways that preferentially induce Tregs? –  Weak stimulus (peptide antigen, anti-CD3); +

IL-2?

Page 28: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Functions of Interleukin-2: the dogma

Page 29: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

The unexpected biology of IL-2

•  Interleukin-2 is the prototypic T cell growth factor (TCGF), required for initiating clonal expansion of T cells in response to antigen

•  BUT: knockout of IL-2 or the α or β chain of the IL-2R results not in immune deficiency but in systemic autoimmunity and lymphoproliferation

Page 30: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Dual roles of IL-2 in T cell responses

Surprising conclusion from knockout mice: the non-redundant function of IL-2 is in controlling immune responses

Page 31: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Therapeutic potential of IL-2: a revision

•  IL-2 was originally used to boost immune responses in cancer, HIV infection (promoting effector and memory T cells)

•  Inconsistent clinical results

•  IL-2 treatment can increase number and functional activity of Tregs •  Low-dose IL-2 to treat steroid-resistant

chronic GVHD, vasculitis •  More recent clinical trials ongoing in type 1

diabetes, SLE, graft rejection

Page 32: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Antigen-specific lymphocytes

•  Are antigen-specific T (and B) cells present before treatment? Are they altered by treatment? –  Frequency of naïve T cells predicts magnitude of

response following antigen exposure

•  What are the phenotypic and functional characteristics of antigen-specific lymphocytes?

Need for more sophisticated analyses of antigen-specific lymphocytes

Page 33: Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance · Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium

Strategies for restoring tolerance

•  Administration of antigen in tolerogenic form –  Repeated doses of peptides without adjuvants

•  Blocking costimulation

•  Engaging inhibitory receptors

•  Treg targeted therapies: –  Treg cell transfer –  IL-2