Upload
duongnga
View
217
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
International Bulletin of Drug Research., 4(7): 41-52, 2014
41
DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF RP-HPLC METHOD
FOR SIMULTANEOUS ESTIMATION OF CINNARIZINE
AND PARACETAMOL IN THEIR PHARMACEUTICAL
DOSAGE FORM
RUCHITA J. CHAUHAN*1, T.Y. PASHA
2, STAVAN M. MASTER
3,
KHUSHBU A. THAKOR4, PARTH U. PATEL
5
___________________________________________________________________________
ABSTRACT
In the present work, sensitive RP-HPLC method been developed for the quantitative
estimation of Cinnarizine (CINN) and Paracetamol (PCM) in their pharmaceutical dosage
form. RP-HPLC method for estimation of CINN and PCM was carried on Enable C18
column (5 μm, 250 mm x 4.6 mm i.d) using a mobile phase consisting of Acetonitrile: Water
(70: 30 V/V), pH 2.4 adjusted with 0.1% Ortho phosphoric acid. The mobile phase was
pumped at flow rate of 0.8 ml/min and the detection was carried out at 229 nm. The linearity
was found to be in the range of 2-12 µg/ml and 50-300 µg/ml with (r2=0.9989, and
r2=0.9976) for CINN and PCM respectively. The peaks obtained were sharp having clear
baseline separation with a retention time of 3.209 ± 0.01 and 4.719 ± 0.01 min for PCM and
CINN respectively. The % recoveries of both the drugs CINN and PCM (in sample
preparation) were found to be 99.18-99.88 % and 99.78-99.93 % respectively. The developed
method was validated as per ICH guidelines, for its accuracy, precision, LOD & LOQ,
robustness and the results were found to be satisfactory, thus the method is accurate, precise,
rapid and simple with good sensitivity for estimation of CINN and PCM and was successfully
used for the quantitative analysis of commercially available dosage form.
KEYWORDS
RP-HPLC, Cinnarizine, Paracetamol, Drug analysis, Validation.
AUTHOR’S AFFILIATION
*Author for correspondence
Department of Quality Assurance, Parul Institute of Pharmacy and Research, Limda,
Vadodara- 391760, Gujarat, India, Email: [email protected].
International Bulletin of Drug Research., 4(7): 41-52, 2014
42
INTRODUCTION
Cinnarizine (CINN) is chemically (1-(diphenylmethyl)-4-(3-phenylprop-2-en-1-yl)
piperazine). It is well known Calcium channel blocker. It is used for the symptomatic
treatment of nausea and vertigo caused by Meniere disease and other vestibular disorders and
for the treatment of motion sickness. It is official in IP, BP and EP. IP[1]
, BP[3]
, and EP[4]
describe Potentiometric Titration and Liquid Chromatography method for its estimation.
Literature survey reveals that Colorimetry, Potentiometry titrationand Simple
Spectrophotometry methods[5]
has been carried out for determination of CINN in
pharmaceutical dosage forms as well as in biological fluids. Literature survey also reveals
that RP-HPLC[6]
and HPTLC methods[7]
for determination of CINN with other drugs in
combination have been reported.
Paracetamol (PCM) chemically, N- (4-hydroxyphenyl) acetamide is an analgesic-antipyretic
agent. It is effective in treating mild to moderate pain such as headache, neuralgia and pain of
musculo-skeletal origin. Paracetamol acts predominantly by inhibiting prostaglandin
synthesis in the central nervous system (CNS). Paracetamol probably produces antipyresis by
acting centrally on the hypothalamic heat-regulating center to produce peripheral vasodilation
resulting in increased blood flow through the skin, sweating, and heat loss. The central action
probably involves inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis in the hypothalamus. Paracetamol
(PCM) is official in IP[1]
, USP[2]
and BP[3]
. The pharmacopeial methods include
potentiometric titraton and LC. Literature servey revels that HPLC[8],[9],[10],[11]
, UV
Spectrophotometry [12], [13], [14]
and HPTLC method for the estimation of PCM alone in bulk
drug and in combination with other drugs has been reported. To the best of our knowledge,
there is no official pharmacopeial as well as non-official method reported for simultaneous
determination of CINN and PCM in pharmaceutical formulation dosage form. The present
manuscript describes simple, sensitive, rapid, accurate, precise and cost effective RP-HPLC
method for simultaneous estimation of both drugs in their combined dosage form.
Figure 1: (A) Cinnarizine. Figure 1: (B) Paracetamol.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials & Chemicals
TheCINN and PCM pure powders were procured as gratis samples from Meridian Medicare
Limited (Himachal Pradesh, India) and Unicure Remedies pvt ltd, (Vadodara, India) with
99.95 % and 99.94 % purity, respectively. Tablet formulation, NEUROZINE (Ultramark
Healthcare Ltd.), was obtained commercially with the labeled amounts of 20 mg CINN and
500 mg PCM. Methanol HPLC Grade (Rankem), HPLC Water, Acetonitrile HPLC Grade
(Rankem), Ortho- phosphoric acid (Analytical Reagent grade) were used for HPLC Method.
International Bulletin of Drug Research., 4(7): 41-52, 2014
43
Instruments
A HPLC instrument (isocratic mode, Shimadzu) equipped with UV detector, Rheodyne
injector and Enable C-18 column. A Shimadzu 1800 (Japan) double beam UV/Visible
spectrophotometer with spectral width of 2 nm, wavelength accuracy of 0.5 nm and a pair of
10 mm matched quartz cell was used to detect isoabsorbtivity of both the drugs. A Digital
analytical balance BL 220H (Japan), an ultrasonic bath (Frontline FS 4, India) was used in
the study.
Methodology (RP-HPLC METHOD)
Selection of detection wavelength
In the present study individual drug solutions of 10 µg/ml CINN and 10 µg/ml PCM were
prepared in Methanol.These drug solutions were than scanned in the UV region of 200-400
nm and overlaid spectrum was recorded. Results showed that at 229 nm both the drug possess
good absorbance. So it was selected as detection wavelength for both drugs.
Selection and Preparation of Mobile Phase
Selection of Mobile Phase
Various mobile phase system containing Methanol : Water and Acetonitrile : Water were
tried. When Methanol : Water (different ratios) at different flow rates were tried for
chromatographic separation, the resolution was not satisfactory. Hence, various trails having
different ratio of Acetonitrile : Water at different flow-rates and at different pH had been
taken. Finally, the optimal composition of the mobile phase was determined to be
Acetonitrile : Water (70:30 v/v), pH 2.4 adjusted with OPA at flow rate (0.8 ml/min).
Preparation of mobile phase
A mixture of 70 ml Acetonitrile and 30 ml of HPLC grade water filtered through 0.45 μm
filter paper, sonicated for 10 minutes to degas the mixture and used as mobile phase. Adjust
the pH to 2.4 by using O-phosphoric acid.
Chromatographic Conditions
Enable C-18 column (250 mm x 4.6 mm i.d., 5 µm) was used as stationary phase. The mobile
phase composed of Acetonitrile: Water (70:30 v/v), pH adjusted to 2.4 with OPA; at flow rate
of 1.0 ml/min with run time of 10 min. The detection of both the drugs was carried out at 270
nm.
Preparation of Standard Solutions
CINN Standard stock solution (200 μg/mL):
A 20 mg of standard CINN was weighed and transferred to a 100 ml volumetric flask and
dissolved in 25 ml mobile phase. The flask was shaken and volume was made up to the mark
with mobile phase to give a solution containing 200 μg/mL CINN.
International Bulletin of Drug Research., 4(7): 41-52, 2014
44
PCM standard stock solution (5000 μg/mL)
A 500 mg of standard PCM was accurately weighed and transferred to a 100 ml volumetric
flask and dissolved in 25 ml mobile phase. The flask was shaken and volume was made up
tothe mark with mobile phase to give a solution containing 5000 μg/mL PCM.
Calibration curve for CINN and PCM
Calibration curve for the CINN (2-12 μg/mL) and PCM (50-300 μg/mL)
5 ml of stock solution was transferred to a 50 ml volumetric flask and volume was made up to
the mark with mobile phase to give a solution containing 20 μg/mL CINN and 500 μg/mL
PCM. Appropriate volume was transferred to different volumetric flasks of 10 ml capacity,
adjusted to the mark with the mobile phase to obtain 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 μg/mL CINN and
50, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300 μg/mL PCM. The mixed standard solution was
chromatographed for 10 minutes using mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min. The graphs
were plotted for Concentration. vs Peak area for both the drugs.
Method Validation
The proposed method was validated according to International Conference on Harmonization
(ICH) guidelines.
Linearity and Range (Calibration Curve)
The linearity response was determined by analyzing 6 independent levels of calibration curve
in the range of 2-14 µg/ml for CINN and 50-300 µg/ml for PCM. The plot of peak area
against concentration was plotted. Correlation coefficient and regression line equations for
CINN and PCM were calculated.
Accuracy (Recovery Study)
Accuracy is the closeness of the test results obtained by the method to the true value.The
accuracy of the method was determined by calculating the recoveries of CINN and PCM by
standard addition method. Known amounts of standard solutions of CINN and PCM were
added at 50, 100 and 150 % level to prequantified sample solutions of CINN and PCM. The
amounts of CINN and PCM were estimated by applying obtained values to the respective
regression line equations.
Precision
The precision of an analytical method is the degree of agreement among individual test
results when the method is applied repeatedly to multiple samplings of homogenous samples.
It provides an indication of random error results and was expressed as coefficient of variation
(CV).
Repeatability
6 replicates of standard mixture solution having CINN (4 μg/mL) and PCM (100 μg/mL)
were prepared and chromatograms were recorded and % RSD was calculated.
International Bulletin of Drug Research., 4(7): 41-52, 2014
45
Intraday precision
Standard solutions containing 4, 6 and 8 μg/mL CINN and 50, 100 and 150 μg/mL PCM
were analyzed 3 times on the same day as per the procedure. Chromatogram of each sample
was taken. SD and % RSD were calculated.
Interday precision
Standard solutions containing 4, 6 and 8 μg/mL CINN and 50, 100 and 150 μg/mL PCM
were analyzed on three consecutive days as per the procedure. Chromatogram of each sample
was taken. SD and % RSD were calculated.
Limit of Detection
Calibration curve was constructed for 6 times and the SD of the intercepts was calculated and
LOD was calculated using the following formula,
LOD= (3.3*SD)/Slope
Where, SD = the standard deviation of Y- intercept of 6 calibration curves.
Slope = the mean slope of the 6 calibration curves.
Limit of Quantitation
Calibration curve was constructed for 6 times and the SD of the intercepts was calculated and
LOQ was calculated using the following formula,
LOQ= (10*SD)/Slope
Where, SD = the standard deviation of Y- intercept of 6 calibration curves.
Slope = the mean slope of the 6 calibration curves.
System suitability testing
System suitability testing is an integral part of many analytical procedures. The tests are
based on the concept that the equipment, electronics, analytical operations and samples to be
analyzed constitute an integral system that can be evaluated as such. System suitability test
parameters to be established for a particular procedure depend on the type of procedure being
validated.
Robustness
Change in Flow rate
One conc. of mixture CINN (4 μg/mL) and PCM (100 μg/mL) was analyzed 3 times at 3
different flow rate and record the peak area, Rs and T and % RSD is calculated.
Change in Mobile Phase Ratio
One conc. of mixture CINN (4 μg/mL) and PCM (100 μg/mL) was analyzed 3 times at 3
different mobile phase ratio and record the peak area, Rs and T and % RSD is calculated.
International Bulletin of Drug Research., 4(7): 41-52, 2014
46
Change in Wavelength
One conc. of mixture CINN (4 μg/mL) and PCM (100 μg/mL) was analyzed 3 times at 3
different wavelength and record the peak area, Rs and T and % RSD is calculated.
Determination of CINN and PCM from its tablet dosage form
Sample preparation
Twenty tablets were weighed and finely powered. Powder equivalent to 20 mg CINN and
500 mg PCM was accurately weighed and transferred to volumetric flask of 100 ml capacity.
50 ml of mobile phase was transferred to this volumetric flask and sonicated for 20 min and
volume was made up to the mark with mobile phase. The above solution was filtered through
whatman filter paper No. 41 (0.45µ) to give a solution containing 200 µg/ml CINN and 5000
µg/ml PCM (solution A). 5 ml of solution A was transferred to a 50 ml volumetric flask and
volume was made up to the mark with mobile phase to give a solution containing 20 μg/mL
CINN and 500 μg/mL PCM (solution B). 2 ml of solution B was transferred to a 10 ml
volumetric flask and volume was made up to the mark with mobile phase to give a solution
containing 4 μg/mL CINN and 100 μg/mL PCM.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The RP-HPLC Method showed adequate separation of CINN and PCM in their tablet dosage
form. The separation was achieved on a Enable C18 (250mm X 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm particle
size) with a isocratic system of (Acetonitrile : Water ) in the ratio of (70:30 v/v), pH adjusted
2.4 with Ortho-Phosphoric acid. The mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min, Injection
volume 20 μl and wavelength of detection used was 229 nm. The retention time for PCM and
CINN was obtained as 3.209 ± 0.1 min and 4.719 ± 0.1 min, respectively. The linearity of the
proposed method was investigated in the range of 2-12 μg/ml and 50-300 μg/ml for CINN
and PCM respectively. Correlation coefficient was 0.9989 and 0.9976 for CINN and PCM,
respectively. The developed method was validated as per ICH guideline, for its accuracy,
precision, LOD & LOQ, robustness and the results were found to be satisfactory, thus the
method is specific, rapid and simple with good sensitivity for estimation of CINN and PCM.
These analytical methods are also applicable in ordinary laboratories. It can also be adopted
for quality control tests for these drugs in tablets. The % recoveries of both the drugs CINN
and PCM (in sample preparation) were found to be 99.18-99.88 % and 99.78-99.93 %
respectively.
Figure 2: Selection of Detection Wavelength.
PCM
CINN
International Bulletin of Drug Research., 4(7): 41-52, 2014
47
Figure 3: Optimized Chromatogram of binary mixture of 100 µg/ml of PCM and 04
µg/ml of CINN.
Table 1: Optimized Parameters for Chromatographic conditions.
S.
No. PARAMETERS CONDITIONS
1. Mobile Phase Acetonitrile : Water (70:30 v/v)
(pH 2.4 adjusted by 0.1 % Orthophosphoric acid)
2. Pump Mode Isocratic
3. Stationary Phase Enable C18 (250mm X 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μmparticle size)
4. Diluent Mobile Phase
5. Flow Rate (mL/min) 0.8
6. Run Time (min) 10
7. Injection volume 20 μL
8. Detection Wavelength 229 nm UV Detector
9.
Retention Time (mins)
- Paracetamol
- Cinnarizine
3.209
4.719
Figure 4: Chromatograms of Paracetamol and Cinnarizine for Linearity.
PCM
CINN
International Bulletin of Drug Research., 4(7): 41-52, 2014
48
Table 2: Linearity Data of CINN. Table 3: Linearity Data of PCM.
Concentration
(µg/ml)
Peak Area of
Cinnarizine
Concentration
(µg/ml)
Peak area of
Paracetamol
2 6748 50 145166
4 26649 100 488466
6 43736 150 969469
8 60184 200 1279084
10 78231 250 1661692
12 93786 300 2018634
Figure 5: Calibration curve of Cinnarizine.
Figure 6: Calibration curve of Paracetamol.
International Bulletin of Drug Research., 4(7): 41-52, 2014
49
Table 4: System Suitability Parameters for PCM and CINN.
Parameter PCM CINN
Retention Time
(min ± SD) (n=6) 3.209 ± 0.0108 4.719 ± 0.0321
Tailing factor (T) 1.246 1.275
Theoretical plate (N) 8186.163 9933.094
Resolution (R) 6.798
Table 5: Summary of Validation Parameters.
PARAMETER CINNARIZINE PARACETAMOL
Detection Wavelength 229 nm
Beer’s Range 2 – 12 μg/mL 50 – 300 μg/mL
Equation Y= 8662.6 X +
9082.7 Y= 7540.9 X – 225911
r2 0.9989 0.9976
Repeatability
(% RSD) (n=6) 0.743 0.533
Intraday Precision
(% RSD) 0.385 – 0.715 0.365 – 0.591
Interday Precision
(% RSD) 0.48 – 1.16 0.495 – 1.05
LOD 0.275 0.617
LOQ 0.835 1.869
% Recovery (n=3)
50 99.88 ± 0.280 99.78 ± 0.13
100 99.18 ± 0.261 99.93 ± 0.14
150 99.79 ± 0.236 99.87 ± 0.24
International Bulletin of Drug Research., 4(7): 41-52, 2014
50
System Suitability
Retention
time 4.718 ± 0.1 min 3.209 ± 0.1 min
Resolution 6.587 –
Tailing
Factor 1.237 1.219
Theoretical
Plates 9933.094 8186.163
Robustness Change
in Flow Rate
(mL/min)
(% RSD)
0.7 0.671 0.481
0.8 0.384 0.250
0.9 0.904 0.272
Robustness Change
in Mobile Phase
Ratio (ACN : Water,
V/V)
(% RSD)
68:32 0.977 0.251
70:30 0.420 0.490
72:28 0.491 0.360
Robustness Change
in Wavelength (nm)
(% RSD)
228 0.849 0.320
229 0.651 0.493
230 1.086 0.463
Analysis of Pharmaceutical Preparation
%Assay of Paracetamol (100μg/ml) and Cinnarizine (04 μg/ml) in their combined dosage form.
Figure 7: Chromatograph of 100 μg/ml of Paracetamol and 04μg/ml of
Cinnarizinefrom tablet (NEUROZINE).
International Bulletin of Drug Research., 4(7): 41-52, 2014
51
Table 6: % Assay of Cinnarizine and Paracetamol.
Drug Content
Conc. taken
for % assay
(µg/ml)
Peak Area of
Sample
Amount
found
(mg)
% Assay Mean %
Assay ± SD
CINN (20 mg)
4 25149 19.758 98.79 98.73
±
0.35
4 24998 19.671 98.35
4 25239 19.810 99.05
PCM (500 mg)
100 518953 493.88 98.77 99.13
±
0.39
100 521328 495.45 99.09
100 524842 497.78 99.55
CONCLUSION
The proposed RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of Cinnarizine and Paracetamol
in combined dosage form was found to be simple, sensitive, accurate, precise and rapid. The
method utilizes easily available and cheap solvent for the analysis of CINN and PCM and
hence it provides clear evidence that the proposed method can be successfully used for
simultaneous estimation of both the drugs from marketed formulations.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We are grateful to Meridian Medicare Limited (Himachal Pradesh, India) and Unicure
Remedies pvt.ltd, (Vadodara, India) for the gratis samples of pure CINN and PCM,
respectively. We also thank to Dr. T.Y. Pasha, Principal, Parul Institute of Pharmacy and
Research, Limda, Vadodara for providing necessary facilities to carry out research work.
REFERENCES
1. Indian Pharmacopoeia:Volume II& III, Government of India, Ministry of Health and
Family Welfare, 2010: 1088 and 1859.
2. United States Pharmacopoeia- 32 and National Formulary- 27: Vol II, Asian edition,
United States Pharmacopoeia Convention, Rockville, MD, USA, 2009: 1388.
3. British Pharmacopoeia: Volume I & II Monographs: Medicinal and Pharmaceutical
Substances, 2010: 507, 1611.
4. European Pharmacopoeia 7.0, Volume II, General Monograph, France, 2011, pp
1696.
5. Nagasirisha M, Kumari KS, Bhargavi K and Beulah VR:Development and Validation
of UV- Visible Spectrophotometric Method for the Estimation of Cinnarizine in Bulk
and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form.Indo American J. Pharm. Res.2013;3(2):4339-
4347.
International Bulletin of Drug Research., 4(7): 41-52, 2014
52
6. Kumari SA and Naga SM: Validated RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation
of Cinnarizine and Domperidone in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage form. J. Pharm
and Scientific Innovation 2013; 2(2):46-50.
7. Chitlange SS, Nikumbh MB, Bhusal RD and Wankhede SB: Development and
Validation of HPLC and HPTLC Methods for Determination of Cinnarizine and
Domperidone Maleate in Combination.Int. Res J Pharm. App Sci.2012; 2(5):20-26.
8. Godse VP, Deodhar MN, Bhosale AV, Sonawane RA, Sakpal PS, Borkar DD and
Bafana YS: Reverse Phase HPLC Method for Determination of Aceclofenac and
Paracetamol in Tablet Dosage Form.Asian J. Research Chem.2009; 2(1):37-40.
9. Chandra R and Sharma KD: Quantitative Determination of Paracetamol and Caffeine
from Formulated Tablets by RP-HPLC Separation Technique.Int J. Chromatographic
Science2013; 3(2):31-34.
10. Maslarska V and Tencheva J: Simultaneous Determination and Validation of
Paracetamol and Codeine Phosphate in Pharmaceutical Preparation by RP-HPLC.Int
J. Pharm and Pharmaceutical Sci.2013; 5(2):417-419.
11. Pattan SR, Jamdar SG, Godge RK, Dighe NS, Daithankar AV Nirmal SA and Pai
MG: RP- HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Paracetamol and Etoricoxib
from Bulk and Tablets. J. Chemical and Pharm Res.2009; 1(1):329-335.
12. Behera S, Ghanty S, Ahmad F, Santra S and Banerjee S: UV-Visible
Spectrophotometric Method Development and Validation of Assay of Paracetamol
Tablet Formulation.J. Anal Bioanal Techniques2012; 3(6):1-6.
13. Sharma KK and Patel PU: First Derivative Spectrophotometric Method for the
Simultaneous Estimation of Tolperisone and Paracetamol in their Combined Dosage
Form.J. Pharm Sciences and Bioscientific Res.2012; 2(2):92-96.
14. Sawant R, Joshi R, Kawade D and Sarode V: Development and Validation of
Spectrophotometric Methods for Simultaneous Estimation of Paracetamol and
Meloxicam in Pure and Tablet Dosage Form. Der Pharmacia Lettre.2010;
2 (2):471-478.
15. Q2 (R1), Text on Validation of Analytical Procedures, International Conference on
Harmonization, Geneva, November 2005, pp 1-13.