Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DIE GARTEN TULLN
“Nature in the Garden
City” Award Process
Case study, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
Thomas Uibel 01.10.2012
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 1
Table of contents
Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 2
History ..................................................................................................................................................... 2
Garden expertise region...................................................................................................................... 2
Selecting the region................................................................................................................................. 3
Collecting data......................................................................................................................................... 4
Results ..................................................................................................................................................... 6
Wording of the support scheme ........................................................................................................... 10
Green space criteria .......................................................................................................................... 10
Communities’ accompanying measures............................................................................................ 12
Support scheme................................................................................................................................. 12
Overview of projects in the region........................................................................................................ 13
“Nature in the Garden City” Tulln Award Process................................................................................. 13
Green space criteria .......................................................................................................................... 13
Town council resolution .................................................................................................................... 15
Public relations .................................................................................................................................. 15
Participating institutions ....................................................................................................................... 17
Follow-up projects developed based on the project requirements ..................................................... 17
Garden show paths ........................................................................................................................... 17
Perennial mixes ................................................................................................................................. 18
Perennial reference gardens ............................................................................................................. 25
Rose study and practical guide to roses............................................................................................ 25
Findings ................................................................................................................................................. 26
Lower Austrian garden hotline service centre ...................................................................................... 26
“Nature in the Garden” services for communities (as of 2012)............................................................ 26
Information for communities ................................................................................................................ 27
Consulting process today ...................................................................................................................... 27
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 2
Introduction
This document describes the award process of the first community to use the “Nature in the Garden”
criteria as the foundation for cultivating its green space.
The core criteria No pesticides
No chemical or synthetic fertilisers
No peat
Natural garden elements Wild shrubs
Wildflower meadows and meadow elements
Wild growth permitted, wild corner
Special locations, deciduous trees
Flowers and flowering perennials
Cultivation and kitchen garden Compost pile, dwellings for beneficial organisms
Rainwater use, environmentally friendly
material, mulches, vegetable beds and herbs
Fruit orchard and berry bushes
Mixed cultivation/crop rotation/cover crops
Source: “Willkommen im Garten!” brochure
www.naturimgarten.at/Download
Based on the example of the town of Tulln an der Donau, the relevant conditions of Lower Austria’s
“Nature in the Garden” campaign is described before, during and after this project in addition to the
town’s process. The aim is to present a comprehensive illustration to facilitate similar plans for
partner organisations in the “Hybrid Parks” INTERREG III project.
History When the “Nature in the Garden” campaign was being considered before it was established in 1999,
public space was included in many deliberations even though the campaign was initially geared
primarily to owners of home gardens. The idea was for communities’ green spaces to act as a model
for citizens, encouraging them to design and maintain their own gardens in a more natural way.
Initially, support schemes were used as tools to achieve this. These schemes were intended for
communities, and projects deemed exemplary were awarded. The working group referred to
internally as the “green space group” developed various projects over the years, including a “Green
Space Survey” to take stock at the community level. The aim was to obtain specific and meaningful
information about the use of plant protection agents, the size of communities’ own green spaces, the
cost of green space maintenance and so on.
Garden expertise region
For budget reasons, the green space survey was used for the first time in 2006 to test a region of 24
communities. Preparations for the 2008 Lower Austrian Tulln and Grafenegg Provincial Garden Show
were used as the occasion. The first working title was therefore “Provincial Garden Show Region”.
These regions were to be provided funding for presenting their traditional garden expertise to the
public in the form of gardening and landscape design companies by developing green spaces to add
ecological and design value. The two locations:
* Tulln, home to DIE GARTEN TULLN, a new ecological model garden (www.diegartentulln.at)
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 3
* Grafenegg, home to a renewed landscape garden surrounding Castle Grafenegg
(www.grafenegg.com)
The title was later changed to “Regional Garden Expertise” (Gartenkompetenz-Region); both titles
are used here since the original documents were used.
Selecting the region
The area between Tulln an der Donau and the community of Grafenegg corresponds to the political
district of Tulln with the addition of the neighbouring communities of Hausleiten, Grafenegg and
Stetteldorf am Wagram.
The map shows locations that could be designated for potential nature-oriented projects in public
areas; some were suitable as themed gardens with show garden character
Red dot = public green space (68 projects)
Yellow triangle = themed gardens (23 locations)
Prominent locations were also surveyed to enhance the feeling of community within the region:
3 green dots = regional symbol, e.g. three cherry trees (50 locations/150 trees) with marker
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 4
Collecting data
Each of the following communities was visited for approximately five hours in March/April 2006.
Gemeinde: Homepage: Einwohner: Flächengröße:
Marktgemeinde Absdorf www.absdorf.at 1.605 15,96 km²
Marktgemeinde Atzenbrugg www.atzenbrugg.at 2.497 25,94 km²
Marktgemeinde Fels am Wagram www.fels-wagram.at 1.966 29,50 km²
Marktgemeinde Grafenegg www.grafenegg.gv.at 2.830 28,58 km²
Marktgemeinde Grafenwörth www.grafenwoerth.at 2.615 46,40 km²
Gemeinde Großriedenthal www.grossriedenthal.at 984 18,83 km²
Marktgemeinde Großweikersdorf www.grossweikersdorf.at 2.786 43,32 km²
Marktgemeinde Hausleiten www.hausleiten.gv.at 2.967 61,03 km²
Marktgemeinde Judenau - Baumgarten www.judenau-baumgarten.gv.at 2.075 14,35 km²
Marktgemeinde Kirchberg am Wagram www.kirchberg-wagram.at 3.341 60,26 km²
Marktgemeinde Königsbrunn am Wagram www.koenigsbrunn.at 1.270 28,57 km²
Marktgemeinde Königstetten www.koenigstetten.gv.at 1.888 13,04 km²
Marktgemeinde Langenrohr www.langenrohr.gv.at oder 1.974 22,57 km²
Marktgemeinde Michelhausen www.michelhausen.at 2.524 32,03 km²
Gemeinde Muckendorf - Wipfing www.muckendorf-wipfing.at 980 6,27 km²
Marktgemeinde Sieghartskirchen www.sieghartskirchen.gv.at 6.674 61,59 km²
Gemeinde Sitzenberg - Reidling www.sitzenberg-reidling.gv.at 1.922 22,15 km²
Marktgemeinde St. Andrä - Wördern www.staw.at 6.436 39,33 km²
Marktgemeinde Stetteldorf am Wagram www.stetteldorf-wagram.at 1.021 25,74 km²
Marktgemeinde Tulbing www.tulbing.at 2.534 18,36 km²
Stadtgemeinde Tulln an der Donau www.tulln.at 13.591 72,21 km²
Marktgemeinde Würmla www.wuermla.at 1.258 20,40 km²
Gemeinde Zeiselmauer - Wolfpassing www.zeiselmauer.at.gs 1.966 12,70 km²
Marktgemeinde Zwentendorf an der Donau www.zwentendorf.at 3.714 53,85 km²
The survey involved four steps:
1. Self-guided drive through the community by the person responsible for the region
2. Political contacts and people in the administration were asked questions from the green
space survey
3. Tour with the contacts and detailed visit of potential project sites
4. Documentation (questionnaire, photos and notes) for each community
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 5
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 6
Green space survey
Results
The following evaluation was used as a basis for providing productive support for communities for
reorganisation following the award of a support project.
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 7
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 8
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 9
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 10
Summary of the green space survey
Eighty-seven percent of the communities considered green space important to very important within
the community. On average every community had three projects in the planning stage in conjunction
with the 2008 Provincial Garden Show. Twenty-four of 71 projects related to roadside vegetation.
The communities are willing to implement nature-oriented projects (according to the criteria of the
“Nature in the Garden” campaign) if the relevant information is provided to the community
representatives and public. One out of two communities would provide funding if provincial funding
were offered.
Wording of the support scheme
Green space criteria
The “Nature in the Garden” criteria listed in the introduction were adapted as follows for use at the
community level:
Core criteria (all 3 must be met, published in community newspaper/posted on bulletin boards) Criteria Comments
☺☺☺☺ No pesticides Based on directives for ecological agriculture
☺☺☺☺ No easily soluble
mineral fertilisers
Based on directives for ecological agriculture
☺☺☺☺ No peat To protect peat bogs
Natural garden elements (note that the following items are incorporated into project development)
Local seeds and plants (proof of origin) used for planting new wild native plants.
☺☺☺☺ Wild shrub plantings Hedges primarily of native shrubs or shrubs with ecological value
☺☺☺☺ Meadows, types of natural lawns, meadow elements
Proper maintenance by type
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 11
☺☺☺☺ Permitting wild growth/ rare and endangered plants typical for the community
Small-area and individual plants, in defined spaces (e.g., streets, building niches etc.)
☺☺☺☺ Ecological retreats, wild corners
Large-area, plant communities, wild diversity in areas and properties; causeways, embankments, abandoned areas
☺☺☺☺ Deciduous trees
Native deciduous trees or deciduous trees with ecological value, including climbing plants
☺☺☺☺ Flowers and flowering perennials in beds
Flowers and perennials with ecological value as an insect meadow
☺☺☺☺ Special sites
West or dry, artificial ponds, swimming ponds and dry stone walls, window boxes
☺☺☺☺ Dwellings for beneficial organisms
Piles of plant trimmings or stones, decayed wood, logs with holes, nesting boxes; “hotels” for beneficial organisms
☺☺☺☺ Public harvest Vegetable beds, herbs, fruit orchard, berry bushes
☺☺☺☺ Compost cycle Nutrient cycle in the community association: use of green waste and compost
☺☺☺☺ Cover crops Increase soil fertility
☺☺☺☺ Mulches Wood chips, grass clippings, flax mulch and residue-free bark mulch
☺☺☺☺ Rainwater use Delivery for recovery or infiltration (unsealed open spaces)
“Nature in the Garden” (NiG) community promoted by Lower Austria (must meet at least 3)
☺☺☺☺ 1/3 of the necessary home garden signs
Key: < 200 households at least 10 gardens with NiG hedgehog sign < 600 households at least 20 gardens with NiG hedgehog sign 600 and more households at least 30 gardens with NiG hedgehog sign
☺☺☺☺ Location with “Nature in the Garden” community sign
At least one location
☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺ NiG individual projects A maximum of 3 individual projects will be taken into
account
☺☺☺☺ Playgrounds with a nature-oriented design or nature-oriented space used by children
Created elements: hills, shrub groups (native shrubs), balance beams made from natural logs, shade trees, movable natural materials (wood, stones, etc.), water, etc. Inherently nature-oriented areas
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 12
Communities’ accompanying measures
Potential accompanying campaigns in the communities:
1) For increasing acceptance of nature in green spaces:
Visits, training – announce to the public and invite interested parties
2) Nature and art in the community:
Motivate regional artists, art pieces and have artists help design areas with natural garden elements,
dwellings for beneficial organisms, wild plants, wild plant areas, etc.
3) Campaign – rare or endangered regional plant as a symbol on the coat of arms
Advertise, preserve and promote plants typical to the local conditions and not widespread. More
information about providers of regional species is available at:
www.rgv.co.at/PartnerBS.html
web.utanet.at/szedalpe/Resources/Gehoelze.pdf
www.wildblumensaatgut.at
[email protected], www.arche-noah.at
Support scheme
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 13
Overview of projects in the region
“Nature in the Garden City” Tulln Award Process
Green space criteria
The “Nature in the Garden criteria for green spaces” list was coordinated with the nature-oriented
activities of the town of Tulln an der Donau. The following table shows the status as of the end of
2007.
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 14
Core criteria (all 3 must be met; published in community newspaper TULLN Criteria Comments Reference Action Exceptions
☺☺☺☺
No pesticides Based on directives for environmental agriculture
Fighting chestnut leaf-miner moths by strengthening trees; harmful agents (Rubidox), agents that do not require a permit to purchase and agents that are not harmful to beneficial organisms
Systemic and leaf fertiliser; planting primarily disease-resistant varieties; copper
Avenue trees along the Danube, Donaulände only in rose gardens and outdoor seating areas; moat
☺☺☺☺ No easily soluble mineral fertilisers
Based on directives for environmental agriculture
Primarily only in intensive cultivation Mannakom, rock dust Rose gardens
☺☺☺☺ No peat To protect peat bogs Primarily only sewage sludge compost 2008 NiG attempt
1 sewage sludge : 6 soil
Flower boxes and pots
☺☺☺☺ Inventory A detailed inventory of existing green space and cultivation must be submitted.
Entente Florale; green space with maintenance plan; tree register largely in place;
Competition; survey and documentation
Documents updated on an ongoing basis
Natural garden elements (note that the following items are incorporated into project development and are applied in substantial areas of the community) Local seeds and plants grown in the region (proof of origin) will be used for planting new wild native plants ☺☺☺☺ Wild shrub plantings Hedges primarily of native
shrubs or shrubs with ecological value
Alongside bicycle paths… according to “Nature in the Garden” criteria, mix and maintenance
Plants from “Heckentag”, types of field maple…
Ornamental shrubs in the centre
☺☺☺☺ Meadows, types of natural lawns, meadow elements
Proper maintenance by type
We have tried wildflower meadows, but the soil is often too nutrient-rich! NO fertiliser!
2 types of grass seed: hardy and for embankments
Areas with public appeal in the centre
☺☺☺☺ Permitting wild growth/rare and endangered plants typical for the community
Small-area and individual plants, in defined spaces (e.g., streets, building niches etc.)
Only on undeveloped areas, tried in infiltration swales; Nitzing
Education about coat of arms plants needed (including thistle).
Not yet accepted by residents (“immigrants” to gardens)
☺☺☺☺ Ecological retreats, wild corners
Large-area, plant communities, wild diversity in areas and properties; causeways, embankments, abandoned areas
Embankments on the Danube and Kleiner Tulln, noise control embankments, areas adjacent to the Aubad swimming area with steep embankments to the sledge hill, windbreaks and wildlife protection belts (soil conservation facilities)
Mow only once to a maximum of three times a year with a flail mower, grass clippings left behind
Areas with public appeal in the centre
☺☺☺☺ Deciduous trees Native deciduous trees or deciduous trees with ecological value, including climbing plants
Oaks, chestnuts, lindens, maple ,… on embankments; “green walls” with climbing plants
Native trees, forest plants Roadside areas with continuous leading shoots – 4.5 m clearance (nursery plants)
☺☺☺☺ Flowers and flowering perennials in beds
Flowers and perennials with ecological value as an insect meadow
Coordinated with NiG criteria Catmint, coat of arms plants
☺☺☺☺ Special sites Wet or dry, artificial ponds, swimming ponds and dry stone walls, window boxes
Exist naturally along “old branch” of the Danube, Kl. Tulln
Maintain or revitalise
☺☺☺☺ Dwellings for beneficial organisms
Piles of plant trimmings or stones, decayed wood, logs with holes, nesting boxes; “hotels” for beneficial organisms
“Tree hotel” in the flood plain/ Provincial Garden Show, wildlife conservation areas north bank of Danube, nesting boxes on southern bank on Donaulände
Bringing to urban areas
☺☺☺☺ Public harvest Vegetable beds, herbs, fruit orchard, berry bushes
Vegetables beds, possible fruit tree project (cherry, walnut, apple) and mixed berry hedges
LWFS; possibly BOKU; in nursery schools and on playgrounds
☺☺☺☺ Compost cycle Nutrient cycle in the community association: use of green waste and compost
Green waste collected and composted Flower markets via Association of Local Authorities for Waste Management and Fee Collection (GVA)
Sewage sludge compost from compost providers in agriculture
☺☺☺☺ Cover crops Increase soil fertility Flail mower on embankments and boundary areas
Not necessary for new areas Areas with public appeal in the centre
☺☺☺☺ Mulches Wood chips, cut grass, flax mulch and residue-free bark mulch
Bark mulch tested (linden), ground cover; reforestation in the floodplain
☺☺☺☺ Rainwater use Delivery for recovery or infiltration (unsealed open spaces)
Infiltration swales and grass pavers; watering with rainwater
Used as often as possible; potentially at nursery schools, schools
Small spaces
NiG community “Nature in the Garden” community sponsored by Lower Austria (at least 3 must be met) ☺☺☺☺ 1/3 of the necessary home
garden signs Key: < 200 households at least 10 gardens with NiG hedgehog sign < 600 households at least 20 gardens with NiG hedgehog sign < 600 households at least 30 gardens with NiG hedgehog sign
> 30 signs; potentially also for nursery schools? More information for private individuals from the “Nature in the Garden” citizens’ information service
☺☺☺☺ Locations with “Nature in the Garden” community sign
At least one location Not yet, possibly Nitzing with Anger and new playground
☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺ NiG individual projects A maximum of 3 individual projects will be taken into account
2 roundabouts submitted and Am Anger in Nitzing To be carried out according to submission.
☺☺☺☺ Playgrounds with a nature-oriented design or nature-oriented space used by children
Created elements: hills, shrub groups (native shrubs), balance beams made from natural logs, shade trees, movable natural materials (wood, stones, etc.), water, etc. inherently nature-oriented areas
Submit public playgrounds? Check criteria
Gießgang in Natura 2000 area north of the Danube and wildlife refuge hill in flood drainage basin Saved “Überländgraben” drainage way natural monument (green space network) near Langenrohr Wildlife passages, infiltration swales and ecological areas following building of high-performance rail line Soil conservation belts created with watering holes for dry periods filled with solar pumps
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 15
Town council resolution
The following resolution was adopted by the Tulln town council in December 2007.
The Town of Tulln aspires to become the first community in Lower Austria to earn the distinction
“Nature in the Garden City”. Doing so will improve the ecological quality of public green spaces. The
following principles and measures should be adopted for most public green spaces:
• Closeness to nature is an important principle and will be achieved by applying the “Nature in
the Garden – green space criteria” (see appendix) in design and maintenance.
• Beginning immediately, new plantings will be shifted to predominately location-appropriate
plants that are typical for the region and thus have ecological value according to the “Nature in the
Garden” publications of Lower Austria.
• No English lawns; conversion to herb lawns.
• Treatment for preventing leaf-miner moths in horse chestnuts expanded immediately using
combination fertiliser treatment, which has proven successful in tests.
• Immediately planting nature-oriented public green spaces in parallel when creating new or
revitalising estates.
• Additional measures will be developed in consultation with the “Nature in the Garden”
consultants and implemented gradually through regulations.
The following timeline has been defined:
1. Once the measures described in the resolution have been successfully implemented and a
detailed budget and schedule for achieving outstanding criteria have been determined
(implementation in phase 2): awarding of the “Nature in the Garden City” distinction.
2. The full project is to be implemented by 2018.
Converting the cultivation of public green spaces will entail a shift in monetary expense and effort.
The aim for the medium term is to compensate for the increase in effort and expense of
environmental measures through savings from support, less maintenance and watering, and
chemicals.
Public relations
In the context of awarding the distinction, residents in the community area were asked to design
their home gardens according to the criteria of the “Nature in the Garden” campaign, to request
consultation or to be awarded with the Lower Austria garden sign. (Source: www.tulln.at 2012)
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 16
Tulln becomes a “Nature in the Garden” city
Nearly 100 friends of the garden in Tulln have already taken advantage of a
“Nature in the Garden” consultation from the province of Lower Austria or are
proud owners of a hedgehog sign. And one owner of a large estate in Tulln has
already applied for the sign: the town itself.
Tulln was the first town in Lower Austria to commit to nature-oriented
cultivation of 550,000 m² of public green space. The unanimous decision was
taken by all parties in December 2007 to become the first “Nature in the
Garden City”.
Municipal gardener Ewald Fellner: “Of course in nature you can’t switch from
conventional treatment to ecological, nature-oriented green space
maintenance from one day to the next. Our current task is to gradually lay the
foundation for reaching our goal in three to five years: doing without sprays,
mineral fertilisers and peat in large-scale green space maintenance.” Here are
two examples.
Site-appropriate rose/perennial mix in the moat
The twenty-year-old rose gardens in the Tulln town garden have exceeded
their life span. The depleted, compacted substrate was replaced with a water-
permeable soil mix. By planting special, very hardy new rose varieties, we
hope to be able to do without spraying in future. Plantings of site-appropriate,
ecological shrub and perennial mixes in the immediate vicinity provide a
habitat for beneficial organisms, which naturally keep many pests that target
roses in check.
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 17
Creating natural wildflower meadows in municipal areas
The transition zones between the highly maintained Donaulände street and
the naturally vegetated areas in the Tulln floodplain and Aubad swimming
area are being allowed to return to their natural state. Natural wildflower
meadows, which provide an ideal habitat for beneficial organisms, were
created near the BMX track and the Water lilly bridge bayou.
Nature seeks out the garden
The “Nature in the Garden” hedgehog sign is a special award for gardens that
are cultivated and designed with nature in mind. It is awarded to owners of
natural gardens who have gone though a personal consultation. The first step
is to stop using pesticides, easily soluble mineral fertilisers or peat to improve
your soil.
If you have berry bushes, a vegetable garden or a compost pile, then you’ve
earned the sign!
Call the Lower Austrian garden hotline at +43 (0) 2742 / 74 333. The much-
loved hedgehog sign is awarded free of charge in 2008.
Participating institutions
Office of the Lower Austrian Provincial Government, Land Use Planning, Environment, Transport
Group, Environment and Energy Management Department, 3109 St.Pölten, Landhausplatz 1, Building
17
Follow-up projects developed based on the project requirements
Garden show paths
Community representatives came up with the idea of working together to market bicycle and hiking
paths in the region to use the new green space projects and blossoming garden expertise region for
tourism. A letter to the mayor (left) accelerated creation of brochures on the bicycle and hiking paths
from Grafenegg to Tulln (centre) and bicycle and hiking paths from the Vienna Woods to the Danube
(right).
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 18
Perennial mixes
Long-term implementation of the projects in the garden expertise region
would not have been possible without the region’s gardening companies.
Alexander Schmidhammer from Hameter, a perennial grower from
Tullnerfeld, was contracted to develop site-appropriate mixed perennial
plantings, which were made available to all communities and planners in an
information sheet.
Four different mixes are available. The perennial mixes brochure (in German
only) is available for download at http://www.naturimgarten.at/Download.
The focus was placed on practical information. Establishing a modular system, annual maintenance
and the expected number of hours required were outlined in detail.
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 19
English version:
Perennials bring a natural variety of colours and shapes to green spaces. Using them requires
experience with planning, planting and care. The following plant concept will show you how to
ensure your perennial plantings are a success:
PLANT COMPOSITIONS
The plant mixes consist of perennials and bulbs, which can be supplemented with woody plants or seasonal plantings. Your perennial package will bloom in fascinating colours from spring to late
autumn. Interesting structures and seed heads provide for variation even in winter. The combination
of short-lived and long-lived perennials creates a dynamic that will last for years. The right mix for a
particular location can be highly attractive without requiring a significant amount of care.
CHARACTERISTICS
Plant mix: > Perennials, bulbs, seeds > 6 plants per m²
> Required care: approximately 8 minutes per m² per year
Possibilities: > Multi-family housing sites > public green spaces
PLANTING
The ideal time to plant perennials is from the end of March to mid-May and from mid-September to
the end of October. They should not be planting in freezing or hot weather. Nor should they be
planted in wet soil. Bulbs are planted in frost-free soil from mid-September to the end of November.
There are three steps to planting:
1. Preparing the soil thoroughly
The soil must be free of all weeds. Perennial weeds such as ground elder must be removed before planting. Regular care is needed, especially while the plants are taking root. Loosen compacted soil
well. Improve very heavy soil with sand or fine gravel. Overall fertilisation using organic materials
such as compost or horn meal is only recommended for nutrient-poor soil.
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 20
2. Arranging the perennials
The following guide describes how to arrange plants. Perennials are laid out in the following order
depending on their function. Start with architectural perennials:
Architectural perennials: Distribute individual plants in a pattern over the entire planting area,
spacing plants approximately 60 cm apart and avoiding the edges of the bed
Perennial groups: Arrange plants in groups of 3 to 10 across the entire bed, spacing plants
approximately 45 cm apart
Ground cover: Arrange plants along the border or in bands extending into the bed, spacing plants approximately 30 cm apart
Scattered plants: Distribute individual plants throughout the entire bed, filling in gaps
3. Planting the perennials
Once you have distributed all the perennials, it is time to plant them. Follow these instructions to
ensure optimal growth:
• Remove the top layer of the root ball if weeds are present.
• If the root ball is dry, dip it in water before planting.
4. Planting bulbs
Bulbs: Plant bulbs between perennials in loose groups of 10 to 100 at a depth of two to three times
the height of the bulb.
5. Watering
Water plants thoroughly once they are in the ground. In dry weather, water repeatedly while the
plants are taking root.
CARE
Each planting requires a minimum of care! If your soil is well prepared, beds only needs to be
maintained four to six times, or a total of roughly eight minutes per m², per year (not including setup
and travel time). We recommend just a few minutes of regular maintenance. Longer periods of less
frequent maintenance increases pressure from weeds.
1. Watering
Once plants have been planted and taken root, they only need to be watered during long hot, dry
periods. One deep watering is better than frequent shallow watering.
2. Weeding
The danger that beds will become infested with weeds is greatest immediately after planting.
Perennial weeds must be removed as soon as possible. It is best to remove then when the soil is
damp. Use a spade to dig out weeds with deep roots and a weeder to pull out weeds that form
taproots. Weeds that form seeds must be removed before they go to seed. Do not use a hoe as this
will destroy bulb growth.
3. Pruning
With a few exceptions (grasses), perennials are cut back to one hand length above the ground at the
end of November. Use pruning shears to cut back plants. Leave bulb foliage until it turns brown. Only cut back scattered plants once they go to seed.
4. Fertilising
Nutrient-rich soil does not need to be fertilised in the first few years. Later, you can compensate for a
nutrient deficiency by adding horn meal or compost in the spring. Perennials are largely winter-hardy
and do not need to be protected in the winter.
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 21
5. Tying
Perennials do not need to be staked or tied.
6. Mulch
Mulch is not recommended if you want the different scattered plants to reseed. However, this means
more maintenance while the plants take root. You can use mineral materials (gravel, bricks, etc.) or
organic materials (bark, etc.) as mulch. If you use organic mulch, we recommend applying fertiliser
first.
All four mixes were planted for observation near the Water lilly bridge, which was built following the
2008 Lower Austrian Provincial Garden Show on the high-traffic Donaulände street in the centre of
Tulln. This is a visible sign of town gardeners’ sustainable understanding of green space.
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 22
���� Shade-lovers There is no need for shade plants to hide behind bushes and hedges. Shade-loving plants feel at
home under their protection. In the spring, their
delicate blooms rival those of the woody plants. With
their saturated colours, mountain fleece and meadow
rue extend the blooming period into the summer. The
bold blossoms of the hosta extend above its large
leaves. As autumn approaches, evergreen grasses and
waldsteinia take over.
Characteristics: • Fresh green, robust foliage
• Delicate blooms in saturated colours
• Evergreen aspects
Location:
• Partial shade to shade
• Moderately dry to slightly damp soil
• Minimum area of 30 m²
Associations Sound and movement – shadow dancers
Comfortable oasis – drop of water in the desert
���� Sun-lovers
Sun-loving plants are tough. Their name says it all. With
intense yellow, orange and white colour accents and
bright, lush greens, they are an enduring highlight of this
bed. Plants like yarrow and hypericum compete with tall
sundrops – a round dance of plants that captures the full spectrum of the sun’s colours.
Fig. 1: Shade-lovers 09.06.2009, edge of the forest at Water lilly bridge Tulln
Fig 1: Sun-lovers 09. 06. 2009 behind the handrail of the Water lilly bridge
Tulln
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 23
Characteristics:
• Sun perennials
• Golden-yellow, orange and white blooms
• Easy to maintain
Location:
• Treeless, sunny areas
• Moderately dry to slightly damp soil
• Well drained soil • Minimum area of 30 m²
Associations:
Colourful – cheerful – friendly
Like a brilliant yellow sunrise
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 24
� � � � Romantic wave Garden The perennials in the romantic garden mix also like
the sun. Plants like the bloody cranesbill and lamb’s
ear follow the elegant lines of the bed, separated by
beautiful islands of showy purple coneflower and
allium. Late in the season, plumbago adds blue
accents throughout. The large variety is easy to plant
and care for – who wouldn’t want to be a romantic?
Characteristics:
• Love sun
• Blue, lilac-pink blooms
• Easy to maintain
Location:
• Treeless, sunny areas
• Moderately dry soil
• Well drained soil
• Minimum area of 30 m²
Associations:
Showy – ebullient – expressive in their form
On the sunny side – set sail
� � � � Arid dreams garden Yucca and Atlas fescue dominate the Mediterranean
look of the arid dream garden. In blue, pink and yellow,
the perennials are the best supporting actors in very dry
areas. What yellow chamomile, Dianthus plumarius,
Fig 2: Romantic wave garden and Knautia macedonica 09.06.2009, Water
lilly bridge Tulln
Fig. 3: Arid dreams garden 09.06.2009 Water lilly bridge Tulln, at the bike
path next to the Danube
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 25
catmint and salvia lack in height, they make up for in their abundant blooms. They are interspersed
with many low-growing plants that peek up from underneath fragrant silvery sun-drenched leaves.
Characteristics:
• Sun perennials
• Lustrous, multi-coloured
• Drought-resistant
Location: • Treeless, sunny areas
• Dry soil
• Well drained soil
• Minimum area of 30 m²
Associations:
A sea of sun
Rock garden – sand and beach
Perennial reference gardens
Stemming from the perennial mixes and experience with them, a study entitled “Reference gardens
for perennial use in Lower Austria” was initiated by
the “Nature in the Garden” campaign and Lower Austria. The team from the
Outdoor Plant Use working group (University for Natural Resources and Life Sciences) was
responsible for designing and carrying out the three-year research project (from April 2008 to April
2011).
The project set out to create a register for perennial use in Lower Austria with different reference
gardens in public green spaces. The register contains information about the creation of planted
areas, the appearance, maintenance and optimisation of the plant population in each of the gardens,
for example. Seven individual reference gardens were created in cooperation with six project
communities and the partial support of external experts. Gardens were monitored over two growing
seasons, and monitoring included regular assessment of the plants, mapping, photographic
documentation and surveys of passers-by. Maintenance was also recorded, the soil and/or substrate
was analysed and climate data from the Austrian Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics
were added. (www.naturimgarten.at/Download)
Rose study and practical guide to roses
A rose study (2008-2011) was also developed out of the close cooperation between “Rose
Community Tulln” and “Nature in the Garden”. It surveyed the community area as well as the Baden
Rosarium in Lower Austria. The practical guide “Ecological Plant Production in Roses” (Lower Austria,
2012) introduces the most important pests and diseases that affect roses, summarises experience
with caring for roses and applying ecological plant protection gained from a four-year research
project, and makes recommendations on how to implement maintenance measures in practice.
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 26
Findings Continuous supervision is urgently needed. People who were previously responsible are no longer
involved due to restructuring. The resulting gap in supervision has led to numerous ambiguities and
has extended the amount of time needed (by one year)!
Data, lists and forms were created as needed based on the pilot project. These clear specifications
must be spelled out and explained in person as otherwise differences in understanding cause
problems. Prepared documents are available as the standard for the current (2012) award processes.
It is difficult to establish a suitable new structure or to find appropriate dates for a complex topic.
Therefore, using existing structures and trying to change individual items on the agenda is more
productive.
Many offers have been improved or created based on the experience from the project:
Lower Austrian garden hotline service centre The Lower Austrian hotline service centre for green spaces has been established to answer questions
about design and maintenance. It offers:
• Telephone consultation
• Diagnosis of plant pests and diseases (using photos or samples)
• Orders for publications
• Registration for events
Lower Austrian garden hotline, +43 (0) 2742/74333, Mon., Tues., Thurs., Fri. from 8 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
and Wed. from 9:00 a.m. to 5 p.m., [email protected]
“Nature in the Garden” services for communities (as of 2012) Numerous findings from the consulting process in Tulln have been developed into a complete range
of services at the community level in Lower Austria. Schools, nursery schools, playgrounds, hospitals,
nursing homes and so on can also take advantage of services:
The “Nature in the Garden Academy” holds annual training, continuing education and advanced
training for employees and supervisors of public green space:
• Certified training course in green space maintenance
• Lower Austrian green space day
• Ecological maintenance training day
• Different symposia on topics relating to public green space
• Ongoing advanced education courses on green space cultivation at the “Nature in the Garden
Academy”
at Tulln Garden
Design consultation for nature-oriented and easy-to-maintain new designs or redesigns of all public
green space:
• 3 subsidised consultation units for communities (communities pay €70/unit)
Maintenance consultation following an initial consultation on the following topics:
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 27
• Going green with maintenance, communication
• Reducing maintenance effort
• Consulting according to the new Plant Protection Act
Information for communities
The “Nature in the Garden” campaign makes informational texts available to communities at no
charge to be able to inform residents about seasonally relevant topics in public green spaces.
Information on the following topics is available at www.naturimgarten.at/Gemeinden:
•APHIDS
•BOX TREE MOTHS
•CHEMICALS IN THE GARDEN
•FERTILISING IN THE SPRING
•NUTRIENT DEFICIENCIES
•PREVENTIVE MEASURES IN MARCH AND APRIL
Consulting process today “Nature in the Garden” helps communities design and cultivate green space
ecologically and attractively. Use the following distinctions to present your community to the public
as an environmentally friendly and nature-oriented place
“Nature in the Garden” (Natur im Garten) sign:
“Public green space – ecologically maintained” (Öffentliche
Grünräume – Ökologisch Gepflegt)
With the help of the campaign, convert the design
and maintenance of your community’s green space
according to the “Nature in the Garden” criteria and earn
this distinction. Some ten communities are currently on the path to
receiving this distinction.
“Nature in the Garden – right here at home” (Natur im Garten – Bei
uns im Ort) signs
Communities are awarded this sign
if they have a high number of
Lower Austria garden signs in their
residents’ home gardens:
Municipalities up to 200 residents – 10 signs
200 to 600 residents – 20 signs
600 and more residents – 30 signs.
Case study of the “Nature in the Garden City” award process, using Tulln an der Donau as an example
DIE GARTEN TULLN – Thomas Uibel, December 2012 28
This award lets everyone who enters the community
know about its ecological commitment.