Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Dra. Gemma VilahurCardiovascular Research Center
IIB‐ HSCSP, UAB, CSIC‐ICCCBarcelona
Diferències en els mecanismes d’acció dels antiagregants.
Implicacions
Atherosclerosis progressionHealthy vessel
Healthy arteryFatty streak Fibrous
atheromatous plaque
Plaque ruptureFatty streak progression
Pathophysiology of CVD: aterosclerotic plaque rupture and thrombus formation
ATHEROTHROMBOSISThrombus formation
PAD
CVA Acute coronary syndromes
WORLDWHO 2012CVD: 17,5 million people died from CVDLEADING CAUSE OF DEATH GLOBALLY(31% total)
2
NSTEMI & UA STEMI
ACS
Acute coronary syndrome: the culprit thrombus
Role of platelet in thrombosis: platelet aggregation and coagulation
G.Vilahur & L. Badimon Vasc Pharmacol. 2014
L. Badimon & G.Vilahur European Heart Journal (ACC) 2013
Platelet aggregation
Coagulation
3
L. Badimon & G. Vilahur Eur Heart J ACC 2014
Antiplatelet targets in CAD
PAR
P2Y1
P2Y12
α2
TP
Epinephrin
ATP
P2X1
ADP
ADP
Seroton
in
Thrombin
TXA2
FVW
Fibrinogen
TXA2
AA
PGH2
PGG2
LamininFibronectin
GPIc/IIaGPIa/IIa
GPIb-IX-V
FVW
5-HT2
PLATELET ACTIVATION
PLATELETACTIVATION
PLATELET ACTIVATION
Rc GPIIb/IIIa
Collagen
PAF
Platelet
GPVI
Collagen
AMPc
ADP recptor antagonists
Clopidogrel CangrelorTicagrelor
PrasugrelElinogrelTiclopidine
Subendothelium
PDE inhibitors
DipyridamoleCilostazol
PAR inhibitors
Vorapaxar
Thromboxanereceptor blockade
TerutrobanSulotroban
Aspirin
Thromboxanepathway inhibitors
PDE
Abciximab
GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors
EptifibatideTirofiban
Antiplatelet targets in CAD: aspirin
Arg120
NSAIDS(naproxen,ibuprofen,etc)
Reversibleinteraction
uponaspirinwithdrawal,there‐appearanceofthromboxaneA2biosynthesisfullyrecoversafter
7‐10days
4
γGαqPLC
Ca2+
Platelet SHAPE CHANGE
TRANSIENT plateletaggregation
I3P + DAGPKC
P2Y12 P2Y1
αIIbβ3
L. Badimon & G. Vilahur Rev Esp Cardiol 2012
ADP‐receptors signaling pathway
ADP
Gi
Active metabolites
Hepaticmetabolism
TICLOPIDINECLOPIDOGRELPRASUGREL
TICAGRELORCANGRELORELINOGREL
γGranules secretion
αβ
PI3K
SUSTAINED platelet aggregation
ACAMPcATP
PKA
VASPVASP-P
PGE1
-
Receptor activation
RBC
Thienopyridines
Ticlopidina Clopidogrel Prasugrel
Primera generación Segunda generación Tercera generación
Administración: oralConversión metabólica: siReversible: noVida media: 30‐50hDuración acción: 5‐10 días
Administración: oralConversión metabólica: siReversible: noVida media: 7hDuración acción: 5‐10 días
Administración: oralConversión metabólica: siReversible: noVida media: 3.5hDuración acción: 5‐10 días
Ticagrelor Cangrelor
Ciclo‐pentil‐triazol‐pirimidine
Análogo del adenosín‐trifosfato
Administración: parenteralConversión metabólica: noReversible: siVida media: 2‐5minDuración acción: 1h
Administración: oralConversión metabólica: noReversible: siVida media: 12hDuración acción: 1día
Elinogrel
Administración: parenteral y oralConversión metabólica: noReversible: siVida media: oral: 12‐14h: parenteral: 50minDuración acción: oral:1 día; parenteral:2h
Sulfonilurea
L.Badimon, G .Mendieta, G.Vilahur Rev Esp Cardiol 2014
P2Y12 receptor blockers
5
L. Badimon & G. Vilahur Rev Esp Cardiol 2012
PK and PD of P2Y12 inhibitors
Esterases (90%)
P2Y12Inactivation
Clopidogrel(2nd GenerationThienopyridine)
Intermediate metabolyte
(2‐Oxo‐clopidogrel)
Inactive Metabolyte (SR26334)
Active metabolyte (R‐130964)
CYP 3A 4/5CYP2C9CYP2C19CYP2B6CYP2D6
CYP 1A2CYP2C19CYP2B6
VariabilityLimited efficacyIrreversible
Glycoprotein ‐P
Prasugrel(3rd Generation Thienopyridine)
Hydrolosis by
esterase
Active metabolyte
(R‐138727)Inactive metabolyte
(R‐95913)
CYP 3A 4/5CYP2C19CYP2B6
Limited variabilityHigh efficacyIrreversible
Thienopyridines bind covalently rendering the receptor non‐functional
for the life of the platelet
ADP
‐20
0
20
40
60
80
100
IPA at 24 hours (%)
Response to Prasugrel 60 mg
Response to Clopidogrel 300 mg
Clopidogrel Responder
Clopidogrel Non‐responder
Interpatient
Variability
Interpatie
nt
Variab
ility
(N=66)
Prasugrel: the most powerful thienopyridine Brandt JT et al. Am Heart J 2007
Healthy Volunteer Crossover Study
6
TRITON TIMI‐38: Balance of SAFETY and EFFICAY
0
5
10
15
0 30 60 90 180 270 360 450
HR 0.81(0.73-0.90)P=0.0004
Prasugrel
Clopidogrel
Days
En
dp
oin
t (%
)
12.1
9.9
HR 1.32(1.03-1.68)P=0.03
Prasugrel
Clopidogrel1.8
2.4
138 events
35 events
CV Death/MI/Stroke
TIMI Major Non-CABG Bleeds
NNT = 46
NNH = 167
Post‐hoc assessments revealed that Prasugrel…
OVERALL
< 60 kg
>=75 years
Yes
0.5 1 2
PriorStroke/TIA
Age
Weight
Risk (%)
+ 54
‐16
‐1
‐16
+3
‐14
‐13
Clopidogrel BetterHR
Pint = 0.006
Pint = 0.18
Pint = 0.36>=60 kg
< 75 years
No
Prasugrel Better
7
Yang X et al J Cardiovas Pharm & Therap 2013
Clopidogrel Aspirin
Platelet aggregation
30min ischemia +
3h reperfusion
ClopidogrelAspirin
Pleiotropic effects of P2Y12 antagonists: reduce infarct size
Infarct size
Zhao et al, Am J Physiol 2003
Post‐conditioning protective effects
Clopidogrel 300mg vs 600 mg: ARMYDA‐6 trial
Primary end‐point : infarct size
2) Improved coronary flow
1) Improved coronary patency
Potential explanations:
8
Prasugrel
(Thienopyridine)
Hydrolosis by
esterase
Active metabolyte
(R‐138727)Inactive metabolyte
(R‐95913)
CYP 3A 4/5CYP2C19CYP2B6
Limited variabilityHigh efficacyIrreversible
L. Badimon & G. Vilahur Rev Esp Cardiol 2012
Esterases (90%)
P2Y12Inactivation
Clopidogrel
(Thienopyridine)
Intermediate metabolyte
(2‐Oxo‐clopidogrel)
Inactive Metabolyte (SR26334)
Active metabolyte (R‐130964)
CYP 3A 4/5CYP2C9CYP2C19CYP2B6CYP2D6
CYP 1A2CYP2C19CYP2B6
VariabilityLimited efficacyIrreversible
Glycoprotein ‐P
TICAGRELOR: REVERSIBLE INHIBITIONWhen ticagrelor is bound, ADP can still bind but does not induce receptor
activation
ADP
PK and PD of P2Y12 inhibitors
Active metabolyte(ciclopentil‐triazolopirimidina)No in vivo
biotransformation
Ticagrelor
(cyclo‐pentyl‐triazolo‐pyrimidine)
Low variabilityRapid effectHigh efficacyReversible
3‐4dayswithdrawalprevious CABG
PRASUGREL:9dayscompleteplateletrecovery
CLOPIDOGREL7dayscompleteplateletrecovery
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
12
11
109
876
5
4
3210
13
CV
de
ath
, MI
or
stro
ke (
%)
9.8
11.7
HR=0.84; 95% CI=0.77–0.92; p<0.001
Clopidogrel
Ticagrelor
Months after randomisation
Primary composite endpoint
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
6
4
3
2
1
0
Clopidogrel
Ticagrelor
4.0
5.1
HR=0.79; 95% CI=0.69–0.91; p=0.001
7
5
Months after randomisation
Cu
mu
lativ
e in
cid
en
ce (
%)
CV death
Wallentin L, et al. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1045–1057
9
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
12
11109
876
5
43210
13
CV
de
ath
, MI
or
stro
ke (
%)
9.8
11.7
HR=0.84; 95% CI=0.77–0.92; p<0.001
Clopidogrel
Ticagrelor
Months after randomisation
Primary composite endpoint
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
6
4
3
2
1
0
Clopidogrel
Ticagrelor
4.0
5.1
HR=0.79; 95% CI=0.69–0.91; p=0.001
7
5
Months after randomisation
Cu
mu
lativ
e in
cid
en
ce (
%)
CV death
Wallentin L, et al. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1045–1057
STEMI
4.7
6.1
p<0.01
Myocardial infarction
9.3
11.0
p<0.02
STEMI
PLATO subanalysis in STEMI patients (Nov 2009; AHA)
Storey RF et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010
Maximum LTA response (ADP 20μM) VerifyNow P2Y12 assay
The PLATO PLATELET substudy: Ticagrelor exerts higher antiplatelet effects than clopidogrel
Ticagrelor antiplatelet potential
10
GPIIb/IIIa
Platelet inhibition
ADP
P2Y12
Platelets
TICAGRELOR
Adenosine dependent/independent mechanisms leading to Ticagrelor pleiotropic effects
A1A2aA2bA3
Adenosine receptors
‐ Vasodilation‐ Cardioprotection (post‐conditioning)
‐ Modulation of inflammation
A2A
Antiplatelet effects
Endothelial cells
AMP
CD39(NTPDase‐1)
CD73
ATP
Red Blood Cells
ENT‐1
Red Blood Cells
TICAGRELOR
ADENOSINE
Ticagrelor increases adenosine plasma concentration in ACS patients
↑ Adenosine plasma conc. ↓ RBC adenosine uptake ↑ Risk of apnea
Adenosine dose (ug/kg/min)
Median Borg
value
11
Ticagrelor, does it afford cardioprotection in the setting of acute myocardial infarction?
TICAGRELOR(LD: 180mg; MD: 90 mb bid)
CLOPIDOGREL(LD:600mg; MD: 75mg)
PLACEBO
LAD
Experimental pig model of closed‐chest acute MI induction and reperfusion
2h / 4h 60min
Outcome
Cardiac functional analysisCardiac anatomical analysis
Molecular studies
24h
3T ‐ MRI
G.Vilahur et al. Circulation 2016
Ticagrelor, reduces edema formation post-MI… via adenosine-dependent mechanisms
Treatment CMR
LV mass (g) Non-treated 70.0 [64.1-73.7] Clopidogrel 72.2 [69.3-74.7] Ticagrelor 70.6 [67.9-74.4] Ticagrelor+8SPT 66.5 [65.0-70.2]
Edema (g LV) Non-treated 23.4 [20.9-31.1] Clopidogrel 21.6 [19.5-25.2] Ticagrelor 16.3 [14.2-19.9]*† Ticagrelor+8SPT 24.6 [22.8-25.3]
Edema (% LV) Non-treated 36.2 [33.9-43.2] Clopidogrel 30.1 [26.6-34.5] Ticagrelor 23.1 [20.2-24.4]*† Ticagrelor+8SPT 36.8 [33.6-39.4]
Infact mass (g LV) Non-treated 22.8 [17.3-25.8] Clopidogrel 15.7 [14.2-16.2]* Ticagrelor 12.0 [10.6-12.9]*† Ticagrelor+8SPT 14.9 [14.6-16.1]*
Necrosis (% LV) Non-treated 31.1 [25.9-39.1] Clopidogrel 20.9 [19.3-22.8]* Ticagrelor 16.4 [15.5-17.9]*† Ticagrelor+8SPT 22.4 [21.8-23.9]*
No-reflow (gr LV) Non-treated 4.6 [2.1-6.0] Clopidogrel 2.0 [1.5-2.8]* Ticagrelor 2.1 [1.8-3.0]* Ticagrelor+8SPT 2.2 [2.0-2.6]*
Treatment CMR
Troponin(ng/mL)
Non-treated 19 [16.5-21.7] Clopidogrel 13.4 [13.0-14.0]* Ticagrelor 10.9 [9.3-11.4]*† Ticagrelor+8SPT 14.2 [12.2-16.1]*
Treatment CMR
LVEF (%) Non-treated 43.0 [42.0-43.6] Clopidogrel 47.2 [45.4-48.2] * Ticagrelor 47.2 [45.4-51.0]* Ticagrelor+8SPT 48.7 [46.6-51.0]*
LVEDV (mL) Non-treated 93.0 [87.6-98.1] Clopidogrel 73.7 [68.9-81.3]* Ticagrelor 77.4 [71.8-89.2]* Ticagrelor+8SPT 84.4 [76.9-86.8]*
LVESV (mL) Non-treated 54.0 [49.2-55.6] Clopidogrel 39.5 [36.3-41.9]* Ticagrelor 39.2 [37.3-46.0]* Ticagrelor+8SPT 44.2 [40.4-45.7]*
* p<0.05 vs placebo-control animals† p<0.05 vs clopidogrel-treated animals
G.Vilahur et al. Circulation 2016
12
Treatment CMR
LV mass (g) Non-treated 70.0 [64.1-73.7] Clopidogrel 72.2 [69.3-74.7] Ticagrelor 70.6 [67.9-74.4] Ticagrelor+8SPT 66.5 [65.0-70.2]
Edema (g LV) Non-treated 23.4 [20.9-31.1] Clopidogrel 21.6 [19.5-25.2] Ticagrelor 16.3 [14.2-19.9]*† Ticagrelor+8SPT 24.6 [22.8-25.3]
Edema (% LV) Non-treated 36.2 [33.9-43.2] Clopidogrel 30.1 [26.6-34.5] Ticagrelor 23.1 [20.2-24.4]*† Ticagrelor+8SPT 36.8 [33.6-39.4]
Infact mass (g LV) Non-treated 22.8 [17.3-25.8] Clopidogrel 15.7 [14.2-16.2]* Ticagrelor 12.0 [10.6-12.9]*† Ticagrelor+8SPT 14.9 [14.6-16.1]*
Necrosis (% LV) Non-treated 31.1 [25.9-39.1] Clopidogrel 20.9 [19.3-22.8]* Ticagrelor 16.4 [15.5-17.9]*† Ticagrelor+8SPT 22.4 [21.8-23.9]*
No-reflow (gr LV) Non-treated 4.6 [2.1-6.0] Clopidogrel 2.0 [1.5-2.8]* Ticagrelor 2.1 [1.8-3.0]* Ticagrelor+8SPT 2.2 [2.0-2.6]*
Treatment CMR
Troponin(ng/mL)
Non-treated 19 [16.5-21.7] Clopidogrel 13.4 [13.0-14.0]* Ticagrelor 10.9 [9.3-11.4]*† Ticagrelor+8SPT 14.2 [12.2-16.1]*
Treatment CMR
LVEF (%) Non-treated 43.0 [42.0-43.6] Clopidogrel 47.2 [45.4-48.2] * Ticagrelor 47.2 [45.4-51.0]* Ticagrelor+8SPT 48.7 [46.6-51.0]*
LVEDV (mL) Non-treated 93.0 [87.6-98.1] Clopidogrel 73.7 [68.9-81.3]* Ticagrelor 77.4 [71.8-89.2]* Ticagrelor+8SPT 84.4 [76.9-86.8]*
LVESV (mL) Non-treated 54.0 [49.2-55.6] Clopidogrel 39.5 [36.3-41.9]* Ticagrelor 39.2 [37.3-46.0]* Ticagrelor+8SPT 44.2 [40.4-45.7]*
* p<0.05 vs placebo-control animals† p<0.05 vs clopidogrel-treated animals
8‐SPT
Ticagrelor, reduces edema formation post-MI… via adenosine-dependent mechanismsG.Vilahur et al. Circulation 2016
24
Pla
ceb
o-c
on
tro
lC
lop
ido
gre
lT
icag
relo
r
Necrosis (DE) Edema (T2 STIR)
Tic
agre
lor+
8SP
T
Histopathology
Edema(grLV)
CMRInfarctm
assLV(g)
Y=1.657+0.663*X;r=0.74
Placebo‐controlClopidogrelTicagrelor
Ticagrelor+8SPT
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
*†
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Edem
a(grLV)
Ticagrelor reduces infarct size to a greater extent than clopidogrel and edema formation post-MIG.Vilahur et al. Circulation 2016
13
Molecular analysis related to myocardial edema formation: AQUAPORIN‐4
Aquaporinproteinsaretransmembranechannelscriticallyinvolvedincellularwaterbalanceclosely
relatedtoedemaAquaporin-4 (AQP-4)?
Aquaporin-4 is responsible or cerebral ischemia (Yao et al 2014)
Aquaporin-4 increases after myocardial ischemia and is involved in myocyte swelling and infarct size (Rutkovskiy A et al 2012; Warth et al 2007)
Adenosine signaling regulates aquaporin-4 expression (Lee et al 2013)
Aquaporin-4 expression is found to be reduced in ENT-1-/-
mice (Hinton et al 2014)
G.Vilahur et al. Circulation 2016 (In press)
Aquaporin4
Ischemic
Aquaporin4/β‐actin(AU)
Aquaporin-4 protein levels
Ticagrelor
Placebo‐control
Clopidogrel
Remote
Ticagrelor
Placebo‐control
Clopidogrel
β‐actin
Aquaporin‐4/18SrRNA
Aquaporin-4 mRNA
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Ticagrelor+8SPT
Ticagrelor+8SPT
* *
0
5
10
15
20
Ticagrelor
Placebo‐control
Clopidogrel
Ticagrelor+8SPT
Ticagrelor
Placebo‐control
Clopidogrel
Ticagrelor+8SPT
Ischemic Remote
Molecular analysis related to myocardial edema formation: AQUAPORIN‐4G.Vilahur et al. Circulation 2016 (In press)
14
Molecular analysis related to myocardial edema formation: AMPK
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
AMPK/β‐actin(AU)
P-AMPK
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
P‐AMPK/β‐actin(AU)
AMPK
*
Ticagrelor
Placebo‐control
Clopidogrel
Ticagrelor+8SPT
Ticagrelor
Placebo‐control
Clopidogrel
Ticagrelor+8SPT
Ischemic RemoteTicagrelor
Placebo‐control
Clopidogrel
Ticagrelor+8SPT
Ticagrelor
Placebo‐control
Clopidogrel
Ticagrelor+8SPT
Ischemic Remote
Castanares‐ZapateroDetal.2013
AMPK‐/‐mice:AMPKpreventsventricularedemaformation
G.Vilahur et al. Circulation 2016
Ticagrelor induces cox2 activation and consequent
prostacyclin release
Pg/
mL
6KetoPGF1αCox2 activity
Pg/
mL
*
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
*
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
Ischemic
Tic
agre
lor
Pla
cebo
-con
trol
Clo
pido
grel
Tic
agre
lor+
8SP
T
Ischemic
Tic
agre
lor
Pla
cebo
-con
trol
Clo
pido
grel
Tic
agre
lor+
8SP
T
Arachidonic Acid
Cox2
PGH2
Endothelialcells
PGI2
Prostacyclinsynthase
Metabolyte 6-keto-PGIα
VASODILATIONANTIPLATELET EFFECTS
G.Vilahur et al. Circulation 2016
15
P2Y12
Platelet
• Vasodilation• Cardioprotection• Modulation inflammation
A2A
Antiplatelet effects
ENT‐1
Red blood cells
ADENOSINEISCHEMIA
Adenosine Rc
TicagrelorGPIIb/IIIa ADP
CORONARY THROMBOSIS
Off‐targeteffects
ACS‐STEMI
DirectCardioprotection
Ischemicmyocardium
INFARCT SIZE
EDEMA
AMPK sign.
Aquaporin‐4
3T‐CMR
Cox2 – PGI2
G.Vilahur et al. Circulation 2016
In line with our observations…
Several recent studies have proposed that activated AMPK protects against sepsis‐induced organ damage and inflammation.Escobar DA et al J Surg Res 2015
The post‐hoc analysis of the PLATO trial showed the ticagrelor‐associated reduction insepsis mortality in ACS patients.Storey RF, et al Platelets. 2014
Ticagrelor‐related increase in myocardial COX2 activity may contribute to explainticagrelor benefits reported long after MI in PEGASUS patients.Bonaca MP, et al JAMA Cardiol. 2016;
16
31
ALL GROUPS ORAL TREATMENTMaintenance doses
CMR analysis at 3days and 42 days
Global analysisRegional analysis
ACUTE CARDIOPROTECTION. DOES IT TRANSLATE INTO A BETTER REMODELING PROCESS AND IMPROVED CARDIAC PERFORMANCE AT LONG-TERM?
32
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Edema (gr) No reflow (gr)
3days post-MI
Control
Clopidogrel
Ticagrelor
†
**
gr
LV
*
EDEMA 3 DAYS POST-MI
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Sca
r si
ze (
% L
V)
3days post-MI 42days post-MI
†*
*
†*
SCAR SIZE (3DAYS & 42 DAYS)
TICAGRELOR REDUCES EDEMA AND SCAR SIZE 3 DAYS POST-MI
17
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
LVEDV LVESV LVEF LVEDV LVESV LVEF
3days post-MI 42days post-MI
Control
Clopidogrel
Ticagrelor
TICAGRELOR IMPROVES CARDIAC FUNCTION AT 3 DAYS POST-MI, AN EFFECTS THAT PERSISTS UP TO 42 DAYS
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
LV
EF
(%
) 3d
ays
po
st-M
I
P<0.05
0
LVEF – 3DAYS
*
mL
or
%
§
§§
§
§
§
*
CARDIAC PERFORMANCE
Impact of ticagrelor on cardiac remodeling: regional analysis
34
Coronary irrigation of the LV
18
35
Ticagrelor improves the Wall motion of the infarcted segments
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
Day 3 post-MI Day 42 post-MI
Control
Clopidogrel
Ticagrelor
P<0.05
Wal
l Mo
tio
n (
mm
)
P<0.05
P=0.05
WALL MOTION
Ticagrelor limits remote remodeling
36
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
Day 3 post-MI Day 42 post-MI
Control
Clopidogrel
Ticagrelor
Wal
l Mo
tio
n (
mm
)
P<0.05
P<0.002
WALL MOTION
19
37
TICAGRELOR ACTIVATES AMPK AT LONG TERM IN THE ENTIRE MYOCARDIUM
0
50
100
150
200
250
AM
PK
(A
U)
AMPK
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
300
350
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8C
lopi
dog
rel
Tic
agre
lor
Con
trol
Clo
pido
gre
l
Tic
agre
lor
Con
trol
Clo
pido
gre
l
Tic
agre
lor
Con
trol
P-AMPK P-AMPK/AMPK
*
*
INFARCTED MYOCARDIUM
0
50
100
150
200
250
AM
PK
(A
U)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
300
350
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Clo
pido
gre
l
Tic
agre
lor
Con
trol
Clo
pido
gre
l
Tic
agre
lor
Con
trol
Clo
pido
gre
l
Tic
agre
lor
Con
trol
AMPK P-AMPK P-AMPK/AMPK
**
REMOTE (NON-INFARCTED) MYOCARDIUM
†
†
†
TICAGRELOR ACTIVATES AMPK AT LONG TERM IN THE ENTIRE MYOCARDIUM
20
39
G. Vilahur, M. Gutiérrez, L. Casaní, C. Lambert, G. Mendieta, S. Ben-Aicha, A. Capdevila, G. Pons-Lladó, F. Carreras, L.Carlsson,
A. Hidalgo, L. Badimon
Ticagrelor improves cardiac function and post-myocardial infarction healing in a preclinical model: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging assessment of functional, anatomical and remodeling parameters
Submitted March 2017
L. Badimon & G. Vilahur Eur Heart J ACC 2014
Antiplatelet targets in CAD
PAR
P2Y1
P2Y12
α2
TP
Epinephrin
ATP
P2X1
ADP
ADP
Seroton
in
Thrombin
TXA2
FVW
Fibrinogen
TXA2
AA
PGH2
PGG2
LamininFibronectin
GPIc/IIaGPIa/IIa
GPIb-IX-V
FVW
5-HT2
PLATELET ACTIVATION
PLATELETACTIVATION
PLATELET ACTIVATION
Rc GPIIb/IIIa
Collagen
PAF
Platelet
GPVI
Collagen
AMPc
ADP recptor antagonists
Clopidogrel CangrelorTicagrelor
PrasugrelElinogrelTiclopidine
Subendothelium
PDE inhibitors
DipyridamoleCilostazol
PAR inhibitors
Vorapaxar
Thromboxanereceptor blockade
TerutrobanSulotroban
Aspirin
Thromboxanepathway inhibitors
PDE
Abciximab
GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors
EptifibatideTirofiban
21
Prof. Lina Badimon
Laura CasaníManuel GutiérrezTeresa PadróJudit CubedoSandra CaminoGuiomar Mendieta
Pablo CatalinaMari CanovasJosep MorenoFrancisco J Rodriguez
Gràcies
Antoni CapdevilaGuillem Pons-LladóAlberto HidalgoFrancesc Carreras
Ricart CullelIngrid Blanca Yela