Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Thomas Cavanagh, Ph.D.Vice Provost for Digital LearningUniversity of Central Florida
Digital Learning and the Transformationof the Academic EnterpriseBreaking the Iron Triangle
Over 13,000 faculty and staff224 degree programs26% Hispanic, 47.3% minority54.9% female22% over age 2572,000+ students (Fall 2020)
Center for Distributed Learning• Design and production of online/blended courses• Webcourses@UCF Support for all students/faculty• Pegasus Innovation Lab• Faculty Multimedia Center
UCF Online• Delivery and support of 100+ fully online programs via virtual campus• Marketing and recruitment• Student success coaching and support
Continuing Education• Non-credit programs, in-class and online• Market rate and self-supporting graduate academic programs
Mobile Strategy & Innovation• UCF Mobile app and related mobile initiatives
160 staff: Faculty, A&P,
USPS, OPS
Online Learning at UCF
Pegasus Innovation
Lab
Blended Adaptive
Pilot
Adaptive Learning
Learning Analytics
Online Courses
Online Programs
Mixed-Mode
Lecture Capture
Web-Enhanced
4
The Iron Triangle
IRONTRIANGLE
Immerwahr, Johnson, & Gasbarra, 2008
ACCESS
ACCESS
6
Academic Year 2019-20
• 49.4% total university SCH online and blended• 33% fully online SCH
7
Colleges over 50% digital SCHo Hospitality
80.6% | 42.1% online onlyo Community Innovation & Ed
72.6% | 58.8% online onlyo Nursing
68.3% | 54.2% online onlyo School of Communication
68.8% | 44.9% online onlyo Business
58.4% | 10.5% online onlyo Arts and Humanities
57.2% | 45.9% online onlyo Undergrad Studies
53.8% | 46.3% online only
Colleges over 25% digital SCHo Health Professions & Sciences
43.9% | 33% online only
o Sciences 36.3% | 28.4% online only
o Graduate Studies 39.5% | 14.5% online only
o Engineering & Comp Sci25.8% | 18.1% online only
Academic Year 2019-20
8
UCF Today:72,000+ Students
UCF Today:
Without Digital Learning: 44,000 students
Online Exclusive Headcount by Semester
11
*Terms associated with significant redesign of Business courses from online lecture capture to blended/active
8,810
6,304 6,546
9,916
6,971 6,957
10,389
7,160 7,444
11,110
7,873 7,675
11,947
9,125 8,945
14,177
9,98710,495
14,709
10,65410,405
15,694
10,26710,449
16,205
11,03910,973
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
13
UCF Online Growth Trends
UCF Online Enrollment
• Fall 2020: 6,730
46%
45%
9%
UCF Online Location
Central Florida Other Florida Out of State
UCF Online Demographics
QUALITY
17
18
Student Success
19
Student Withdrawal
Blended Learning 57%Fully Online 55%Face-to-Face 53%Video (fully online) 47%Video (blended) 45%
20
N = 1,431,907
– Dziuban & Moskal, 2017
Overall “Excellent” Student Ratings
UCF Online vs. Non-UCF Online
Grades
UCF Online Success Measures
UCF Online vs. Non-UCF Online
Grades
Achievement gaps are smaller for Pell and minority students in mixed modality & online courses
92 91 85 92 83 96 9289 88 91 89 90 94 9091 91 92 91 91 93 9187 87 89 88 88 90 8989 89 93 89 90 93 8984 85 88 85 85 88 85
0
50
100
Fall 13
% of students receiving A, B or C grades in the course
Fall 15Summer 15Spring 15Fall 14Summer 14Spring 14
Generally, mixed & online courses have slightly smaller achievement gap for Pell vs. face-to-face
...and slightly smaller achievement gap for minorities1 vs. face-to-face
Face-to-face, Pell eligibleFace-to-face, non Pell eligible
Fully online, Pell eligibleFully online, non Pell eligible
Mixed mode, Pell eligibleMixed mode, non Pell eligible
92 91 95 92 92 96 9291 88 92 90 90 94 9090 91 92 90 90 93 9188 88 89 88 89 90 8988 89 83 89 89 9385 86 89 85 86 89 8588
0
50
100
% of students receiving A, B or C grades in the course
Fall 15Summer 15Fall 13 Spring 15Fall 14Summer 14Spring 14
Face-to-face, minorityFully online, minorityFace-to-face, non minorityFully online, non minority
Mixed mode, minorityMixed mode, non minority
1. Minority includes American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian, Black/African American, Hispanic, Latino, Multi-racial, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander. Note: Data shows course-level success rates by modality, split by demographics. Students are not exclusively in one modality, and may be taking courses across different modalities and changing that mix each term, so it is not possible to make connections between demographics and modality outcomes.Source: Data shared by UCF Research Initiative for Teaching Effectiveness (RITE) unit, BCG analysis
Full-time faculty teaching % of online SCH comparable to or higher than % for face-to-face...
22%14% 15% 13%
79%86% 85% 88%
0
80
60
40
20
100106,603
Face-to-face Grad
Face-to-face
Undergrad
Web Grad
982,592% SCH (and total SCH along top of graph)
Modality and level
Web Undergrad
435,571 38,180
23% 18%9% 13%
87%91%82%77%
20
0
60
40
80
100
% sections (and total sections along top of graph)
Modality and level
8,405
Face-to-face Grad
Face-to-face
Undergrad
4,884
Web Undergrad
1,731 905
Web Grad
Adjunct or GTAFull time faculty
Share of SCH in each modality1 taught by faculty vs. adjuncts or GTAs, AY15-16
Share of sections in each modality1 taught by faculty vs. adjuncts or GTAs, AY15-16
Full time faculty
shares likely to increase as UCF has dedicated
funds to hire ~250 more
tenure track faculty
1. For this analysis, figures provided use the same modality definitions as are used for monitoring compliance with regional accreditation standards; mixed-modality courses are considered among the face-to-face activity since there is a physical presence expectation that requires physical resources not required for fully online courses. Note: All figures shown are for AY15-16 (Summer, Fall, Spring). Source: UCF Office of Academic Affairs, UCF interviews, BCG analysis
26
Faculty Development
27
Faculty Development
29
COST
30
31
32
Online % and Speed to Graduation (FTIC Full-time)
33
UNDERGRADUATE
22.2% savings 15.5% savingsGRADUATE
UCF Online Student Savings
POST-COVID-19 Considerations
• 200,000+ SCH to 700,000+ SCH
• 300+ faculty trained in summer 2020
• Future of synchronous learning
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA
digitallearning.ucf.edu
