19
Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife Research Institute 100 Eighth Avenue SE St. Petersburg, FL 33701 727-896-8626 [email protected]

Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica)

health and abundance

Melanie L. Parker and William S. ArnoldFWC - Fish & Wildlife Research Institute

100 Eighth Avenue SESt. Petersburg, FL 33701

[email protected]

Page 2: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District

Water Flow in Florida

Page 3: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP)

• CERP implemented as a means of reinitiating natural freshwater flow to both coasts of south Florida

• Monitoring component of CERP addresses impacts of changed FW flow on the flora and fauna

• Eastern oyster chosen as a target species for CERP

Page 4: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Study Sites

• IMPACTED SITES

St. Lucie Estuary

Loxahatchee River

Lake Worth Lagoon

Biscayne Bay

• CONTROL SITES

Tampa Bay

Mosquito Lagoon

Sebastian River

Page 5: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Mosquito Lagoon

• Pristine environment

• Located within Canaveral National Seashore

• Few anthropogenic or freshwater inputs

Page 6: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Mosquito Lagoon Stations

1

3

2

Page 7: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

St. Lucie Estuary

• Urban environment

• Increasing levels of development, industry and agriculture

• Flood control canals and drainage ditches

Page 8: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

St. Lucie Estuary

• Exposed to altered patterns of water quantity and quality– excess wet season

flows– insufficient dry

season flows– extreme salinity

fluctuations– High sediment and

pollutant inputs

Page 9: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

St. Lucie Stations

North

South

Central

1

1

1

2

2

2

3

3

3

Page 10: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Salinity Patterns Mosquito Lagoon

0

10

20

30

40

50

St. Lucie-North

0

10

20

30

40

50

St. Lucie-South

Date

Jan 2005 Mar 2005 May 2005 Jul 2005 Sep 2005 Nov 2005 Jan 2006 Mar 2006 May 2006 Jul 2006 Sep 2006 Nov 2006

Salinity

0

10

20

30

40

50

St. Lucie-Central

0

10

20

30

40

50

Page 11: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Juvenile Recruitment

• Monthly sampling

• 3 replicate spat arrays at each station

• Count live oysters on underside of each strung shell

Page 12: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Juvenile Recruitment

St. Lucie-South

DateJan 2005 Mar 2005 May 2005 Jul 2005 Sep 2005 Nov 2005 Jan 2006 Mar 2006 May 2006 Jul 2006 Sep 2006 Nov 2006

Mean Spat/Shell

0

5

10

15

20

Salinity

0

10

20

30

40

50

Mosquito Lagoon

0

5

10

15

20

0

10

20

30

40

50

St. Lucie-North

0

5

10

15

20

0

10

20

30

40

50

St. Lucie-Central

0

5

10

15

20

0

10

20

30

40

50

Spat/ShellSalinity

Page 13: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Abundance and Distribution

• Twice per year

• 10 replicate 1-m2 quadrats at each station

• Count total live and dead oysters

• Measure SH of 50 live oysters

Page 14: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Abundance and Distribution

Site

ML SL-N SL-C SL-S

Mean SH (mm)0

20

40

60

80

100

ML SL-N SL-C SL-S

Salinity0

10

20

30

40

50

ML SL-N SL-C SL-S

Mean LiveOysters/m

2

0

100

200

300

400

500

Winter 2005Summer 2005Spring 2006Fall 2006

Page 15: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Perkinsus marinus (Dermo)

• Monthly sampling

• Collect and dissect 15 oysters from each site

• Process gill and mantle tissues with RFTM

• Parasite density ranked with Mackin scale

Page 16: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

St. Lucie-Central

DateJan 2005 Mar 2005 May 2005 Jul 2005 Sep 2005 Nov 2005 Jan 2006 Mar 2006 May 2006 Jul 2006 Sep 2006 Nov 2006

0

20

40

60

80

100

Infection Intensity

0

1

2

3

4

5

Percent Infected and Salinity

0

10

20

30

40

50

% Infected

Infection IntensitySalinity

Mosquito Lagoon

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

1

2

3

4

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

No oysters collected fromJuly 2005 through April 2006

Perkinsus marinus (Dermo)

Page 17: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Summary

Mosquito Lagoon St. Lucie estuary

Mean Max Min Mean Max Min

Salinity 33.6 42.4 26.1 11.1 29.5 0.20

Mean S.D. % Mean S.D. %

Recruitment 1.35 2.52 0.28 1.10

Density 43.0 53.3 96.2 144.4

Shell Height 53.0 26.3 28.4 8.7

Dermo 0.43 0.71 46 0.05 0.25 9

Page 18: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Conclusions

• The prevalence and intensity of dermo infection is greater at the high salinity Mosquito Lagoon site than at the more variable salinity St. Lucie site

• Nevertheless, oysters in Mosquito Lagoon exhibit higher recruitment rates and less variable adult populations relative to the St. Lucie estuary

• The indirect (negative) effects of salinity appear to exceed the direct effects of dermo on oyster health and abundance in east coast Florida waters

• In FLORIDA SOUTHEAST COAST ESTUARIES,it may be premature to conduct oyster reef rebuilding operations until freshwater entering those estuaries is properly managed

Page 19: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Questions?