Diskussionsrunde 2: Kompatibilität und Austauschbarkeit

Diskussionsrunde 2: Kompatibilität und Austauschbarkeit von Planungs- und Maintenance- Daten mit dem Schwerpunkt PID, 3D und EMR

S d K i t kSandor KonietzkaTechnical Sales Manager Central, Eastern & Russia

Join us at Intergraph 2010 Intergraph’s International Users’ Conference Nashville, TN USAJune 14-17, 2010www.intergraph2010.com

SmartPlant Enterprise

5/11/2010 2© 2010 Intergraph Corporation. All Rights Reserved

SP Enterprise for Owner Operators – Solution Overview –S O

SPO Core– Engineering Data Portal

CAPEXProjects

– Plant / Work Breakdown Structures – Document Management & Control– Transmittal management– Master Tag Registry

AssetManagement

– Piping Isometric EngineeringSPO VTL

– Data validation, transformation & loadingSPO Operating Plant

ContentManagement

SPO Operating Plant– O&M Browser– Plant Change Management – CMMS Integration

SPO Project Execution

Health &Safety

SPO Project Execution– Project Change Management– Technical / Site Queries– Interface Management

N f it M t

ReliabilityManagement

– Non-conformity Management

Interoperability

5/11/2010 © 2010 Intergraph Corporation. All Rights Reserved 3

Cross Company Collaboration

Information exchange without boundaries on three levels– Inside the disciplinesp

inside a companybetween companies

– Between the disciplinesInside a company

OO Enterprise

Inside a companyBetween the companies

– Between different companiesInside the disciplinesBetween disciplinesBetween disciplines

Supporting technologies EPC1– Terminal server– Hosting– Worksharing– Standards: e g ISO 15926 XMpLant etc

EPC1Enterprise

EPC2Enterprise

– Standards: e.g. ISO 15926, XMpLant, etc.– Other formats, e.g. IEC 62424,

OwnerOwner PMCPMC EPCEPC SupplierSupplier


Cross Company Collaboration- Terminal Server / Hosting -- Terminal Server / Hosting -


Cross Company Collaboration- SP3D Global Worksharing -- SP3D Global Worksharing -

JacobsCalgary

ColtCalgary

SuncorHost

Jacobs

JacobsMumbai

JacobsCharleston

Mumbai

Suncor Suncor SmartPlantSmartPlant 3D Implementation:3D Implementation:250 Users250 Users–– 250 Users250 Users

–– 5 5 WorkshareWorkshare SitesSites–– Single Replicated ModelSingle Replicated Model


Cross Company Collaboration – ICC1 –CC

Business scenario– OO maintains as-built plant within SPPID, p

SPI and SPEL (integrated via SPF)– Projects are executed by using tools non-

integrated Supported work processes

SPPID (Project 3) SPFEPC (Plant) SPI (Project 3)

Supported work processes– OO can maintain integrated as-built plant– OO can scope multiple projects in parallel– OO can execute projects in a non-

integrated fashionOO

EPC

integrated fashion– OO can export (disconnected) tool projects

(including reference data) to EPC – EPC can execute tool projects in a non-

i t t d f hi ( f d t SPPID (Project 2)

SPPID (Project 3)

SPFOO (Project 2)

SPFOO (Project 3)

SPI (Project 2)

SPI (Project 3)

integrated fashion (no reference data changes)

– EPC can handover tool projects to OO– OO can consolidate tool projects into

i t t d b ilt l t

SPPID (Plant)

SPPID (Project 1)

SPPID (Project 2)

SPFOO (Plant)

SPFOO (Project 1)

SPFOO (Project 2)

SPI (Plant)

SPI (Project 1)

SPI (Project 2)

integrated as-built plant


Intergraph and ISO15926

1991

1990

1980ISO 10303

(STEP)

ISO 10303-221(EPISTLE

STEPLib(EPISTLE POSC-Caesar Proj.

EPISTLE

1993

1994

1992

1991

Notia•POSC Caesar snapshot C/D

(Core)

(RDL)

ISO 1 926

POSC/Caesar

RDLPOSC-Caesar Assoc.

1995

1997

1996

1998

ISO 15926

ISO 15926-2

IntergraphJoins

1st ISO 15926 basedData warehouse

•POSC-Caesar snapshot C/D•Object.Relationship.ObjectISO 15926-

4 15926-7

FIATECH

1999

1998

2000

2001SPF 3.X

•SmartPlant Schema•Interfaces

•Graphs & Views

2004

2005

2002

2003

OWL

Published by ISO

SPF 4.X •Domains

iRi

IDS-ADI

ADIIDS

2007

2006

2005

2008

Published by ISO

Camelot iRing2009

Camelot


Demonstration Data Flow

P&IDs to Data WarehouseHandover Scenario

Hatch

PlantSpace

Equipment, & Instrument

Information Consolidation

Intergraph

pP&ID

Brisbane

SmartPlantFoundation Huntsville

Bechtel

OpenPlantPowerPID

Equipment, & Instrument

RDS/WIP

InformationModel

PowerPIDFrederick

OsloPCA

RDS/WIPOslo5/11/2010 9© 2010 Intergraph Corporation. All Rights Reserved

Information Validation & Take-On – VTL Architecture Overview–O

Reports


VTL Quality Rules

Powerful and highly flexible generic rule definition capability covering:

– Syntax Rules (ENS)Syntax Rules (ENS)– Uniqueness validation– Relationship cardinality– Date/Time validation– Integer validationInteger validation– String validation– SQL Rule definitions for more complex rules– Pick-List validation– Unit of Measure validationUnit of Measure validation– Mandatory fields– Cascading errors

Rules may be included into Rule Sets that are run against data submissions

The results of running a set of rules is a log providing full t bilit f h f d hi h t t h d h ttraceability of who performed which tests, when and what results obtained is held against each submission.

Severity of validation findings may be graded on rules e.g. as “warnings” and “errors”as warnings and errors


Domain-Konzept im Informationmanagement

SPF

ConsolidatedDomain

Authoring

L l

SPF

LocalStore

App #1App #1Publish App #2

P bli hDesign

PublishDomain

LocalStore

App #2DesignBasis

Domain

DesignB i

PublishDomain

gBasis

Domain

EDIT THIS IN "HEADER & FOOTER" UNDER THE "INSERT" MENU Local

ppDomain Basis

Domain

Store5/11/2010 12© 2010 Intergraph Corporation. All Rights Reserved

when it’s not just a technology problem *

Aligning the people, process and technology of the

enterprise.

* It is never just a technology problem

© 2010 Intergraph Corporation. All Rights Reserved

Integrating theEngineering Enterprise

© 2010 Intergraph Corporation. All Rights Reserved

Documents

Diskussionsrunde 2: Kompatibilität und Austauschbarkeit