Dist Attendance Boundaries - May 23 - Community Presentation #3 (052616)

8/16/2019 Dist Attendance Boundaries - May 23 - Community Presentation #3 (052616)

1/46

C A PE HENLO PEN SC HO O L DISTRIC T

REORGANIZATION OF

ENROLLMENT AREAS


2/46

Fall of 2017

• Will Have “5” Elementary Schools

• Better Balance of the Number of Students in Each ofthe “5” Elementary Schools

• Better Balance of the Socio-Economic Status of theStudents Attending Each of the Five Schools

• Will Have “5” Elementary Schools Feeding Into Our

“2” Middle Schools


3/46

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE - JOHN LAZNIK

• Appoquinimink – 4 redistricting projects

• Red Clay – 2015-2016 redistricting

• Christina – 2008-2009 redistricting

• Brandywine – 2009-2010 redistricting

• Milford – opening of Mispillion Elementary redistricting project

• Town of Bridgeville – redistricting after 2010 Census

• Under contract with DOE for maintaining the plan area table, zoneheader and zone detail tables for eSchool/geocode module thatallows the public to look up what schools their physical address isassigned


4/46

TRAVEL TO CHSD

• Better Understand District Boundaries

• Visit Communities – (Paper v Reality)


5/46

Reorganization of Enrollment Areas Guid ing Princ ip le s

1. Safety concerns regarding transportation of students

Bus Stops – Pick-up/Drop-off locations

1. Economic status of the schools more similar than they are currently

2. Students attending school closest to their home

1. Affect the least number of families and students as possible

1. Similar numbers of students in each attendance boundary, understanding that some might

be slightly smaller due to higher rates of student growth

1. Refrain from splitting up students living in the same neighborhoods when making

decision for both elementary and middle school boundaries


6/46

SOCIO ECONOMIC STATUS

2014-2015 - % of Low-Income Students

• H.O. Brittingham Elementary School (58%)

• Milton Elementary School (29%)

• Rehoboth Elementary School (36%)

• Richard Shields Elementary School (27%)


7/46

PREVIOUS TWO YEARS

2013-2014 2014-2015

Low Income (%) Low Income (%)

Brittingham 65.0 58.1

Milton 30.6 29.2

Shields 31.9 27.1

Rehoboth 36.9 36.2

Love Creek - -


8/46

TIMELINE

• April 28 – Presentation to BOE

• May 10 – Community Meeting• CHHS @ 6:00 p.m.

• May 12 – Board of Education Meeting• Presentation/Update from Community Meeting

• May 16 – Community Meeting• BMS Cafeteria @ 6:00 p.m.

• May 23 – Community Meeting• MES Auditorium @6:00 p.m.

• May 26 – Board of Education Meeting• Presentation/Update from Community Meetings


9/46

STARTING POINT

• 2012-2013 Data

• 4 to 5 Enrollment Areas

• Closest School to Home

• Numbers of Students• H.O. Brittingham - 522

• Milton - 260

• Shields - 557

• Rehoboth – 211• Love Creek - 717

• Socio-Economic Status


10/46


11/46

WHERE ELEMENTARY STUDENTS ARE

CURRENTLY ATTENDING


12/46


13/46

OPTION A – STUDENTS ATTEND NEAREST SCHOOL

TO WHERE THEY LIVE


14/46


15/46

OPTION A

Students Attend Nearest School to

Where They Live

Low Income % Low Income % Low Income % Total # of Students

Brittingham 65.0 58.1 53.6 571

Milton 30.6 29.2 30.9 311

Shields 31.9 27.1 21.5 562

Rehoboth 36.9 36.2 33.5 236

Love Creek - - 31.5 801

OPTION A


16/46

OPTION B – PRELIMINARY ASSIGNMENT WITHOUT

BALANCING # OF STUDENTS


17/46


18/46

OPTION A OPTION B

Students Attend Nearest School to Where

They LivePreliminary Assignments

without Balancing # of Students

Low Income % Low Income % Low Income % Total # of Students Low Income % Total # of

Students

Brittingham 65.0 58.1 53.6 571 56.1 581

Milton 30.6 29.2 30.9 311 28.5 369

Shields 31.9 27.1 21.5 562 22.4 608

Rehoboth 36.9 36.2 33.5 236 34.0 439

Love Creek - - 31.5 801 32.6 476

OPTION B


19/46

OPTION C – NORTHERN MOST COMMUNITY

ATTENDS MES


20/46


21/46

OPTION A OPTION B OPTION C

Students Attend Nearest School

to Where They Live

Preliminary Assignments

without Balancing # of StudentsNorthern Most

Community Attends MES

Low Income % Low Income % Low Income % Total # of

Students

Low Income % Total # of

Students


Students

Brittingham 65.0 58.1 53.6 571 56.1 581 52.5 453

Milton 30.6 29.2 30.9 311 28.5 369 38.8 497

Shields 31.9 27.1 21.5 562 22.4 608 22.4 608

Rehoboth 36.9 36.2 33.5 236 34.0 439 34.0 439

Love Creek - - 31.5 801 32.6 476 32.6 476

OPTION C


22/46

OPTION C – STUDENTS CHANGING

CurrentSchool

Brittingham Milton Shields Rehoboth LoveCreek

TOTAL

Brittingham X 129 X X X 129

Milton X X 89 X 120 209

Shields X X X 33 152 185Rehoboth X X X X 208 208

731


23/46

OPTION D – TOWN OF MILTON ATTENDS MES


24/46


25/46

OPTION A OPTION B OPTION C OPTION D

Students Attend Nearest

School to Where They

Live

Preliminary Assignments

without Balancing # of

Students

Northern Most

Community Attends

MES

Town of Milton

Attends MES

Low Income

%

Low

Income %

Low

Income %

Total # of

Students

Low Income

%

Total # of

Students

Low Income

%

Total # of

Students

Low Income

%

Total # of

Students

Brittingha

m

65.0 58.1 53.6 571 56.1 581 52.5 453 54.9 452

Milton 30.6 29.2 30.9 311 28.5 369 38.8 497 33.3 454

Shields 31.9 27.1 21.5 562 22.4 608 22.4 608 26.8 518

Rehoboth 36.9 36.2 33.5 236 34.0 439 34.0 439 32.4 500

Love Creek - - 31.5 801 32.6 476 32.6 476 31.2 549

OPTION D


26/46

OPTION D – STUDENTS CHANGING

CurrentSchool


TOTAL


Milton 47 X 122 X 131 300


981


27/46

OPTION E – NORTHERN MOST COMMUNITY

ATTENDS MES & TOWN OF MILTON ATTENDS MES


28/46


29/46

OPTION A OPTION B OPTION C OPTION D OPTION E

Students Attend

Nearest School to

Where They Live

Preliminary

Assignments without

Balancing # of Students

Northern Most

Community Attends

MES

Town of Milton Attends

MES

Northern Most Community

Attends MES & Town of

Milton Attends MES

Low Income

%

Total # of

Students

Low Income

%

Total # of

Students

Low

Income %

Total # of

Students

Low

Income %

Total # of

Students

Low Income

%

Total # of

Students

Brittingham 53.6 571 56.1 581 52.5 453 54.9 452 38.8 443

Milton 30.9 311 28.5 369 38.8 497 33.3 454 49.0 463

Shields 21.5 562 22.4 608 22.4 608 26.8 518 26.8 518

Rehoboth 33.5 236 34.0 439 34.0 439 32.4 500 32.4 500

Love Creek 31.5 801 32.6 476 32.6 476 31.2 549 31.2 549

OPTION E


30/46

OPTION E – STUDENTS CHANGING

CurrentSchool


TOTAL


Milton 163 X 122 X 132 417


1,223


31/46

OPTION F – NORTH OF SLAUGHTER CREEK ATTENDS

MES & TOWN OF MILTON ATTENDS HOB


32/46


33/46

OPTION C OPTION D OPTION E OPTION F

Northern Most Community

Attends MES

Town of Milton Attends MES Northern Most Community

Attends MES & Town of

Milton Attends MES

North of Slaughter

Creek Attends MES &


HOB


Students


Students


StudentsLow Income

%

Total # of

Students

Brittingham 52.5 453 54.9 452 38.8 443 43.4 454

Milton 38.8 497 33.3 454 49.0 463 44.6 428

Shields 22.4 608 26.8 518 26.8 518 27.7 542

Rehoboth 34.0 439 32.4 500 32.4 500 32.4 500

Love Creek 32.6 476 31.1 549 31.1 549 31.1 549

OPTION F


34/46

OPTION F – STUDENTS CHANGING

CurrentSchool


TOTAL


Milton 90 X 138 X 131 359

Shields X X X 91 210 301

Rehoboth X X X X 208 208

1,100


35/46

ADDITIONAL TOPICS

• Middle School Enrollment Areas

• Use current enrollment areas

• School Choice

• Students currently attending a school outside of theirenrollment area through School Choice will have the optionto stay in their school of choice or follow their newenrollment area assignment


36/46


37/46

MIDDLE SCHOOLS

• BMS – 560 Students

• Low Income – 28.6%

• MMS – 552 Students• Low Income – 34.9%


38/46

TIMELINE

• April 28 – Presentation to BOE

• May 10 – Community Meeting• CHHS @ 6:00 p.m.

• May 12 – Board of Education Meeting• Presentation/Update from Community Meeting

• May 16 – Community Meeting• BMS Cafeteria @ 6:00 p.m.

• May 23 – Community Meeting• MES Auditorium @6:00 p.m.

• May 26 – Board of Education Meeting• Presentation/Update from Community Meetings


39/46

ADDITIONAL OPTION BASED ON

COMMUNITY FEEDBACK


40/46

OPTION G – NORTH OF SLAUGHTER CREEK

ATTENDS SHIELDS & TOWN OF MILTON ATTENDS

HOB


41/46


42/46

OPTION C OPTION D OPTION E OPTION F OPTION G

Northern Most

Community Attends

MES


MES

Northern Most

Community Attends

MES & Town of Milton

Attends MES

North of Slaughter

Creek Attends MES &


HOB

North of Slaughter

Creek Attends Shields &

RT 9 & North of Five

Points Moves to MES

Low Income

%

Total # of

Students

Low Income

%

Total # of

Students

Low Income

%

Total # of

Students

Low Income

%

Total # of

Students

Low Income

%

Total # of

Students

Brittingham 52.5 453 54.9 452 38.8 443 43.4 454 43.4 442

Milton 38.8 497 33.3 454 49.0 463 44.6 428 32.0 429

Shields 22.4 608 26.8 518 26.8 518 27.7 542 42.0 570

Rehoboth 34.0 439 32.4 500 32.4 500 32.4 500 32.4 498

Love Creek 32.6 476 31.1 549 31.1 549 31.1 549 26.0 544

OPTION G


43/46

ENROLLMENT AREAS OF TOWN OF

MILTON STUDENTS REMAIN THE SAME


44/46

TOWN OF MILTON

School Total # # Low SES % Low SES

HOB – Option F 454 197 43.4

MES – Option F 428 190 44.6

HOB – Town Only 135 67 49.7

MES – Town Only 43 10 23.3

HOB – Option F (Current In-Town Enrol lment Area) 411 187 45.6

MES – Option F (Current In-Town Enrol lment Area) 471 200 42.5

*HOB would need to replace the 43 students (10/43 or 23% low Income) lost to MES

with 43 students (5/43 or 12% low income) to reach an overall (192/454 or 42.3% low

income)


45/46

QUESTIONS/COMMENTS


46/46

THANK YOU

Documents

Dist Attendance Boundaries - May 23 - Community Presentation #3 (052616)