Distinctions.docx

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/24/2019 Distinctions.docx

    1/1

    Distinction

    by: Recidivist Habitual Delinguent Quasi-recidivist Reiteration

    Conviction

    Two convictions are enough. It is enough that the

    final judgment has been rendered for the first

    offense.

    At least 3 convictions are required

    Offender is beginning to serve or

    serving sentence by virtue of final

    judgment and commits a felony.

    It is necessary that offender has

    served out his sentence for the

    first offense.

    OffenseCrimes are not specified but embraced in the

    same Title.

    Crimes are limited and specified to T!"#

    $erious%&ess physical injuries' Theft'

    !obbery' "stafa' #alsification

    (oes not require that the offense

    for which the convict is serving

    and the new felony committed are

    embraced in the same title of the

    Code.

    )revious and subsequent offense

    must not be embraced in the same

    title of !)C.

    )enaltyIncreased to the ma*imum period. o requirement

    as to penalty imposed in the prior conviction.

    "ntails additional penalty which increases

    with the number of convictions.

    )enali+es the convict with the

    ma*imum period for the new

    felony committed.

    )rior crime must have been

    penali+ed with an equal or greater

    penalty or , or more crimes with

    lighter penalty.

    )rescription

    There is no time limit between the first conviction

    and the subsequent conviction. !ecidivism isimprescriptible.

    There is a time limit of not more than -

    years between every convictions computed

    from the first conviction or release from

    punishment thereof' to convictioncomputed from the second conviction or

    release therefrom' to the third conviction'

    and so on.

    /o time limit between the first

    and subsequent convictions.

    It is sufficient that the succeeding

    offense be committed after the

    commission of the preceding

    offense.

    /ature

    0eneric aggravating circumstance. Always ta1en

    into consideration in fi*ing the penalty to be

    imposed upon the accused. Can be offset by an

    ordinary mitigating circumstance. If not offset' it

    would only increase the penalty prescribed by law

    for the crime committed to its ma*imum period.

    pecial aggravating circumstance. Cannot

    be offset by any mitigating circumstance.

    Aside from the penalty prescribed by law'

    additional penalty shall be imposed

    depending upon whether it is already the

    third conviction' the fourth' the fifth' and

    so on.

    pecial aggravating circumstance.

    The aggravating circumstances of

    recidivism may not be offset by

    any ordinary mitigating

    circumstance present in the

    commission of the crime.

    0eneric aggravating

    circumstance. /ot always an

    aggravating circumstance.

    !eiteracion is concerned with the

    penalty imposed by law' and not

    the nature of the crime.

    CircumstanceThe circumstance need not be alleged in the

    information.

    The circumstance must be alleged in the

    information' otherwise' the court cannot

    acquire jurisdiction to impose additional

    penalty.

    pecifically alleged in the

    information.

    /ecessary to be alleged in the

    information.

    Submitted by: Teresita Dilabajan, LLB-1 AI0/2"/T I/ C!I2I/A& &A $(ITI/CTIO/4