47
www.alfalaval.com Optimizing large- and small-scale infusion Alyce Hartvigsen Denis Martin 22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 1| Dry hopping and infusion technologies from Alfa Laval

Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com

− Optimizing large- and small-scale infusion

Alyce Hartvigsen

Denis Martin

22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 1 |

Dry hopping and infusion

technologies from Alfa Laval

Page 2: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com

• Introduction to dry hopping and infusion

– the basics and the challenges

• Innovative dry hopping and infusion

solutions from Alfa Laval:

− Iso-Mix External Drive (IMXD): for medium to

large tanks

− Alhop: for smaller tanks and limited hop quantities

(up to 100 kg)

• Questions and answers

2 |22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval

Agenda− What will we talk about today

Page 3: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 3 |

• Dry hopping is the addition of hops

to the fermentation or maturation

vessel during or after main

fermentation in order to extract the

hop flavours into the beer

• It differs from brewhouse hopping

in that isomerization of humulones,

which mainly adds bitterness, is

not desired

What is dry hopping and why is it done?

Page 4: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 4 |

Hop pellets for dry hopping− Economic and process advantages compared to whole flower hops

• Hop pellets: dried, powdered and recompressed hops

• Most frequently used: T-90 pelletized whole hops

• Alternative: T-45 hops (concentrated lupulin fraction,

less bract or vegetal matter)

Page 5: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 5 |

Hop pellets for dry hopping− Economic and process advantages compared to whole flower hops

• Pellets are most frequently used in dry hopping− Easier to handle

− Less costly to store and ship

− Better storage properties

− Higher hop utilization

− Easier to remove from wort/beer

• BUT...

Page 6: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 6 |

Start of test

– weight of dry hops:

• Small bag: 3 kg

• Large bag: 5 kg

End of test (3.5 hours)

– weight of wet hops:

• Small bag: 9.8 kg (+227%)

• Large bag: 19.7 kg (+294%)

Behaviour of hop pellets during disaggregation− Static dry-hopping test: suspending porous bags of hops in 200 litres cold (10°C) water

End of testStart of test

Page 7: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 7 |

Behaviour of hop pellets during disaggregation− Examination of hop solids after static dry hopping test

• Solids were tightly packed in

bags upon removal from water

• High proportion of intact

pellets at the centre of the

small bag

• Conclusion: Incomplete hop

pellet disaggregation due to

insufficient expansion volume

Page 8: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 8 |

• Pellets swell to 6–8 times

the original volume

• Solids cake tightly due to

insufficient space

• Impermeable to fluid flow

• Requires disassembly

and mechanical

excavation of solids

Behaviour of hop pellets during disaggregation− Process risks of hop pellet dosing in confined spaces

Page 9: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 9 |

Behaviour of hop solids during dry hopping− Settling patterns of hop solids in unmixed tanks

• Left side: slurry of 10 g

Simcoe pellets dissolved in

100 ml warm water (40°C)

• Right side: slurry mixed into

1,000 ml cold water (10°C)

and allowed to settle for

two hours

Page 10: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 10 |

Behaviour of hop solids during dry hopping− Process issues related to settling patterns of hop solids before and during tank transfer

Maturation beer

during filtration

after 3–5 days

settling time

and cropping

Near end

of filtration

~2–3%

Ending filtration

→ blockage

Significant hop

material

Blockage of outlet line

caused by floating solids

leaving the tank last

Carryover of solids

from centrifuge to

filtration system

Blockage of heat

exchanger down-

stream of the tank

Page 11: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 11 |

Extraction rate of hop aromas− Limitations of aroma extraction in static dry hopping

• Extraction is driven by the concentration

gradient between the hops and the beer

• Extraction rate is temperature-

dependent – cold extraction is slower

• In unmixed liquids, the beer directly

beside the hop solids becomes

saturated, and extraction slows or stops

• Beer in the middle of an unmixed tank

does not extract much hop aroma or

flavour due to hop solids settling on tank

bottom and/or top

Page 12: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 12 |

• More effective hops dispersion

• Faster and more efficient

aroma/flavour extraction

• Shorter hop residence times

• Homogenization of hop particles

during transfer

• Efficient separation of hops from

beer by centrifugation

• Reduced beer losses

• Reduced process times

Dynamic dry hopping – solution to the challenges− Advantages of mixing during dry hop dosing, extraction and beer transfer/hop removal

Page 13: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 13 |

• Coffee

• Spices

• Fruit pulp

• Liquids

• Powders

Not only dry hopping! − Dynamic technologies can also be used for other flavour infusions

Page 14: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com

Dry hopping and infusion solutions− Alfa Laval IMXD and Alfa Laval Alhop

Alfa Laval IMXD integrated system

• Integrated in the fermentation/maturation

vessels

• Hops are mixed within the main vessel

• For larger volumes (200–5,000 hl tanks)

Alfa Laval Alhop module

• Skid-mounted system

• Hops remain outside the main vessel

• For smaller volumes (5–50 kg or

10–100 kg of pellets per batch)

22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 14 |

Page 15: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 15 |

• Alfa Laval Iso-Mix External Drive

(IMXD) Rotary Jet Mixer

Alfa Laval IMXD integrated system− Provides efficient mixing and homogenization during hop dosing, extraction and hop removal

Cutaway of IMXD installation

on tank dosing point

P&ID showing IMXD,

circulation loop and hop

Page 16: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 16 |

Dry hop slurry tank with IMXD systems− Optimal solution for automated dry-hopping system for larger tanks

Page 17: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 17 |

Effect of IMXD system on hop aroma/flavour extraction− IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping

Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation

IMXD vs. static process

Full aroma extraction in 6–8 hours with IMXD vs. 70+ hours in an unmixed tank

Volatile: significant decrease after centrifugation

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Time, hours

Myrcene

IMXD Unmixed

Post centrifuge

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Time, hours

Geraniol

IMXD Unmixed

Post centrifuge

Page 18: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com

Aroma retention of volatiles: effect of centrifuge type− Comparison of retention rates of monoterpenes in top-feed versus hermetic bottom-feed centrifuges

22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 18 |

• Higher retention of volatile

monoterpene compounds at

outlet of hermetic bottom-feed

centrifuge

• Data supported by customer

experience in certain industries,

such as champagne production

• Non-volatile geraniol included

for comparison (no loss in

centrifugation)

Customer 1 (top-feed HSS) Customer 2 (bottom-feed HSS)

CompoundConcentration (GC analysis) Concentration (GC analysis)

Inlet Outlet Decrease Inlet Outlet Decrease

Myrcene 1550 800 48% 1114.7 978 12%

Geraniol 150 170 –13% 498 506.1 –2%

Caryophyllene 32 8 75% 23.3 15.6 33%

Humulene 475 150 68% 87.8 63 28%

HSS – high-speed separator or centrifuge

Page 19: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 19 |

IMXD system improves hop removal efficiency− Homogenization of centrifuge feed stream enables complete hop removal and reduces beer losses

• Samples at inlet to centrifuge taken at various times

during the transfer of >800 hl dry-hopped beer

• All samples have similar concentrations of yeast and

hop solids

• Homogeneous feed to separator allows consistent inlet

flow to machine, efficient separation performance and

complete solids removal

• Significant reduction in beer losses compared to

settling of hop solids and draining from tank

Page 20: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 20 |

• Hop solids removal may require

extra flushing water or more

frequent discharges to move the

solids to a waste tank

• Drier solids may be discharged

straight to a container

• Automated discharges: baseline

turbidity of dry-hopped beer

higher than for lagers

IMXD system improves hop removal efficiency− Full solids removal by centrifugation with reduced beer losses

Pre → post-centrifugeSample of solids discharge

Page 21: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 21 |

Dry-hopping process improvements with IMXD system− Comparison of unmixed process versus IMXD for two different dry hopped brands at one customer site

Brand 1 Brand 2

Criterion Old method IMXD Old method IMXD

Tank residence time

(from end of ferment to filtration)5–7 days 24–36 hours 7–10 days 24–36 hours

Number of tanks used 4 2 4–5 2

Cropping loss

Up to 10%

cold break

+ hops

Solids removed

through

centrifuge

<2% loss in

maturation from

cold break

Up to 15%

cold break

+ hops

Solids removed

through

centrifuge

<2–3% loss in

maturation from

cold break

Page 22: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 22 |

• Tank size: minimum 150 hl,

maximum 5,000+ hl

• Hop dosing rates: up to 15 g/L

• Tank must have removable/swing cone

• Minimum clearance from tank outlet to

ground > 1.0 meters

• Any method of hop dosing/addition is

suitable

• Hop dosing rate must be controlled

• Hop removal by centrifugation optimal

• Settling and draining of hop solids

also okay

Physical and process requirements for IMXD system− Suitability criteria for implementation of IMXD for dry hopping/flavour infusion

Page 23: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 23 |

• Reduced process time

• Lower product losses

• Smaller waste streams

• Complete hop removal

• Fast, efficient aroma/flavour extraction

• Product flavour matching

• Larger product batches possible

• Higher hop dosing rates possible

• Additional benefits for fermentation optimization, mixing, gas addition and chill back acceleration

• Fast return on investment

Summary: IMXD system optimizes your process− Benefits of IMXD system for dry-hopping, flavour infusion and fermentation optimization

Page 24: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping system− Skid-mounted system

• Skid-mounted system

• Capacity: 5–50 kg or 10–100 kg of pellets

22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 24 |

Hop addition

Dis-aggregation

ExtractionHop

removal

Page 25: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping system− How it works

Beer in

Beer out @ ~35–80 hl/h

Hops in

Hop slurry

cross-flow

recirculation

100 micron stainless

steel strainer

22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 25 |

Page 26: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping system− EU pilot overview: 50 kg max. load

Beer outlet

CO2 inlet Hop inlet

Drains

Upper drain / vent

Sealing water

Beer inlet

22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 26 |

Page 27: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping system− Production steps

Status: clean and

empty system

Hop addition

Dis-aggregation

ExtractionHop

removal

CO2

22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 27 |

Page 28: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping system− Production steps

Beer in

CO2 out

22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 28 |

Hop addition

Dis-aggregation

ExtractionHop

removal

Page 29: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping system− Production steps

22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 29 |

Dry-hopped beer out

Hop addition

Dis-aggregation

ExtractionHop

removal

Beer in

Page 30: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping system− Production steps

22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 30 |

Hop addition

Dis-aggregation

ExtractionHop

removal

Beer in

Dry-hopped beer out

Page 31: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 31 |

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping system− Beer recovery

• Concentration

• DiafiltrationBeer

recovery

Page 32: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping systemBeer recovery – concentration

Beer inlet closed

CO2 addition

22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 32 |

Dry-hopped beer out

Page 33: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping systemBeer recovery – diafiltration

Addition of

deaerated

water (DAW)

22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 33 |

Dry-hopped beer + DAW out

Page 34: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping systemBeer recovery – concentration after

22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 34 |

CO2 addition

Page 35: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 35 |

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping systemVLB results – BRŁO brewery, Germany

Dry hopping dosage:

• 120 hl + 30 kg hop pellets

• 250 g/hl

Parameter Result

Density (g/cm3) 1.00845

Alcohol (% mass) 4.95

Alcohol (% volume) 6.32

Extract, apparent (% mas) 2.63

Extract, real (% mas) 4.88

Original extract (% mas) 14.35

Apparent degree of fermentation, calculated (%) 82.5

Real degree of fermentation, calculated (%) 67.7

Colour (EBC) 18

pH 4.52

Bitterness Units (BU) 52

Page 36: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 36 |

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping systemVLB results – BRŁO brewery, Germany

0

500

1.000

1.500

2.000

2.500

3.000

3.500

4.000

0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180 195

Con

cn

etr

atio

n [µ

g/l]

Time of sampling

Sum of all compounds:

Inlet and outlet samples at 100 % flow rate

Inlet Outlet Reference - Inlet 0 Min. CCV after DH

0

500

1.000

1.500

2.000

2.500

15 30 60 90 120

Co

ncn

etr

atio

n [µ

g/l]

Time of sampling

Δ Inlet vs. outlet at 100 % flow rate

Sum of Terpenoids & Esters Sum of Terpenes Sum of All Compounds

Page 37: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 37 |

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping systemVLB results – BRŁO brewery, Germany

Distribution of hop oil compounds in hop pellet mixture Distribution of hop oil compounds in beer CCV after dry hopping

Page 38: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 38 |

“The high extraction rate of about

85% for the more polar terpenoids

can be regarded as success for the

dry-hopping procedure and

beneficial for hoppy aroma. With

static dry-hopping techniques, it

usually takes several days to extract

these valuable compounds into the

beer. The procedure in this trial

however took about three hours.”

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping systemVLB results – BRŁO brewery, Germany

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Group of compounds

Extraction efficiency of hop oil (compounds)

Total oil Terpenes Terpenoids

Page 39: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 39 |

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping systemVLB results – BRŁO brewery, Germany

Solids retention

(drying method)

• Total solids % before

dry hopping: 4.76%

• Total solids % after

dry hopping: 4.89%

Overall 3% increase in solids

content, including beer-soluble

compounds from the hop pellets Beer in

Beer out @ ~35–80 hl/h

Hops in

Hop slurry

cross-flow

recirculation

100 micron

stainless steel

strainer

Page 40: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping systemEU pilot: first EU run, inlet versus outlet

Beer outletBeer inlet

22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 40 |

Page 41: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping systemEU pilot: second EU runs, inlet versus outlet

Beer inlet Beer outlet

22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 41 |

Page 42: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 42 |

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping systemVLB results – BRŁO brewery, Germany

Beer inlet Beer outlet

Page 43: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 43 |

1.2% beer losses

(without DAW recovery step)

• 1.45 hl out of 120 hl

• 5 l/kg of hop pellets

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping systemVLB results – BRŁO brewery, Germany

Hop slurry sample during

trials not conducted with VLB

Page 44: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com

Alfa Laval Alhop dry-hopping systemVLB results – BRŁO brewery, Germany

22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 44 |

Sensory analysis

“It can be summarized that no significant

difference was found between the general

quality ratings of BRŁO Pale Ale samples.

Furthermore, the samples for BRŁO Pale Ale

(Alhop vs. HopGun) did not differ in their

perception for any attribute. Therefore, the

differences were also not strong enough to

influence the general quality scores.”

Spider web diagram for the comparison of for BRŁO Pale Ale

(Alhop vs. HopGun)

Duration of after taste

Oxidation

Palatefulness

Malt character Acidity

Balance

Intensity of bittemess

Quality of bittemess

Sweetness

Intensity of hop aroma

Intensity of odour

Alhop Hopgun

Page 46: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com

Q&As

22/06/2020 | © Alfa Laval 46 |

Page 47: Dry hopping and infusion · −IMXD versus static process: GC analysis of two hop aroma components for mixed dry hopping Non-volatile: full retention after centrifugation IMXD vs

www.alfalaval.com