2
A Professional Engineer’s Duty to Report In Summary The Office of the Registrar will cooperate with any engineer who reports a situation that the engineer believes may endanger the safety or wel- fare of the public. Wherever possible, the confi- dentiality of reporting engineers and the informa- tion they disclose will be maintained. The Office of the Registrar will emphasize in all dealings with the engineer’s client/employer and the public the engineer’s duty to report under the Act and Regulations, and will provide the reporting engi- neer with an endorsement of the performance of his/her duty, provided that the Registrar has determined that the engineer has acted properly and in good faith. References Please refer to the following sections of the Revised Regulation of Ontario 941/90 made under the Professional Engineers Act. 1. R.R.O. 941/90 Section 77.3 2. R.R.O. 941/90 Section 72.(2)(c) 3. R.R.O. 941/90 Section 77.2.i. FOR MORE INFORMATION Office of the Registrar Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario 40 Sheppard Avenue West Suite 101 Toronto, Ontario M2N 6K9 Tel: 416 224-1100 1-800-339-3716 Fax: 416 224-8168 1-800-268-0496 http://www.peo.on.ca Responsible Disclosure of Conditions Affecting Public Safety A Public Information Guide Published by: Association of Professional Engineers Ontario January 2010

Duty to Report 2010

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

jhg

Citation preview

Page 1: Duty to Report 2010

AA PPrrooffeessssiioonnaall EEnnggiinneeeerr’’ss DDuuttyy ttoo RReeppoorrtt

IInn SSuummmmaarryy

The Office of the Registrar will cooperate withany engineer who reports a situation that theengineer believes may endanger the safety or wel-fare of the public. Wherever possible, the confi-dentiality of reporting engineers and the informa-tion they disclose will be maintained. The Officeof the Registrar will emphasize in all dealingswith the engineer’s client/employer and the publicthe engineer’s duty to report under the Act andRegulations, and will provide the reporting engi-neer with an endorsement of the performance ofhis/her duty, provided that the Registrar hasdetermined that the engineer has acted properlyand in good faith.

RReeffeerreenncceess

Please refer to the following sections of theRevised Regulation of Ontario 941/90 madeunder the Professional Engineers Act.

1. R.R.O. 941/90 Section 77.3

2. R.R.O. 941/90 Section 72.(2)(c)

3. R.R.O. 941/90 Section 77.2.i.

FFOORR MMOORREE IINNFFOORRMMAATTIIOONNOffice of the RegistrarAssociation of ProfessionalEngineers of Ontario40 Sheppard Avenue WestSuite 101Toronto, OntarioM2N 6K9

Tel: 416 224-1100

1-800-339-3716

Fax: 416 224-8168

1-800-268-0496

http://www.peo.on.ca

RReessppoonnssiibbllee DDiisscclloossuurree ooff CCoonnddiittiioonnss AAffffeeccttiinngg PPuubblliicc SSaaffeettyy

A Public Information Guide

Published by:Association of ProfessionalEngineers Ontario

January 2010

Page 2: Duty to Report 2010

IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn

Professional engineers have obligations both totheir clients/employers and to the public. Once ina while these obligations will be in conflict. Onone hand, the engineer is obligated not to discloseconfidential information of the client/employerand must avoid the use of such information tothe disadvantage of the client/employer.1 On theother hand, the PEO’s Code of Professional Con-duct provides that failure to report a situationthat an engineer believes may endanger the safetyor welfare of the public would constitute profes-sional misconduct on the part of the engineer.2

There should be no doubt however as to how theengineer must act. The professional engineer“shall regard the practitioner’s duty to public wel-fare as paramount.”3 Although the engineer’s ulti-mate responsibility is clear, there is no universallyapplicable procedure to be used for dischargingthis responsibility.

In most cases where conflict occurs, it is resolvedsimply by informing the client/employer of thesituation and jointly determining an alternativeand acceptable course of action. In some cases,the approach to the client/employer may have tobe reinforced with the requirements of applicabledemand-side legislation. In the rare case where a“stand-off ” is reached with the client/employer,the engineer must consider more drastic action-with highly increased personal jeopardy. It is forsuch cases that this Guideline is provided.

Engineers must act out of a sense of duty, withfull knowledge of the effect of their actions, andaccept responsibility for their judgment. For thisreason any process that involves “leaking” infor-mation anonymously is discouraged. There is abasic difference between “leaking” informationand “responsible disclosure.” The former is essen-tially furtive and selfish, with an apparent objec-tive of revenge or embarrassment; the latter isopen, personal, conducted with the interest of thepublic in mind and obviously requires that engi-neers put their names on the action and some-times their jobs on the line.

In the past when a “stand-off ” has been broughtto the attention of the PEO, the Office of theRegistrar has taken on the role of “conciliator,”serving as a means to ensure serious communica-tion between the engineer and the other partiesinvolved. In this way, the Office of the Registrarhas served as a “sounding board” for the concernsof the engineer, as an “assessor” of the merit ofsuch concerns, as a “spokesperson” for the com-munication of the concerns to the client/employer,and as a “facilitator” of remedial action. Thereporting process outlined below articulates thisassessing, conciliating and facilitating role.

RReeppoorrttiinngg PPrroocceessss

Engineers are encouraged to raise their concernsinternally with their employers or clients in anopen and forthright manner before reporting thesituation to PEO. Although there may be situa-tions where this is not possible, engineers shouldfirst attempt to resolve problems themselves.

1. If resolution as above is not possible, engineersmay report situations in writing or by tele-phone to the Office of the Registrar of PEO.In reporting the situation to PEO, engineersmust be prepared to identify themselves andbe prepared to stand openly behind their judg-ments if it becomes necessary.

2. The Office of the Registrar will expect thereporting party to provide the following infor-mation:

a) the name of the engineer who is reportingthe situation;

b) the name(s) of the engineer’s client/employer to whom the situation has beenreported;

c) a clear, detailed statement of the engineer’sconcerns, supported by evidence and theprobable consequences if remedial action isnot taken

3. The Office of the Registrar will treat all infor-mation, including the reporting engineer’sname, as confidential to the fullest extent pos-sible.

4. The Office of the Registrar will confirm thefactual nature of the situation and, where thereporting engineer has already contacted theclient/employer, obtain an explanation of thesituation from the client/employer’s point ofview.

5. Where the Office of the Registrar has reasonto believe that a situation that may endangerthe safety or welfare of the public does exist,the Office of the Registrar will take one ormore of the following actions:

a) report the situation to the appropriatemunicipal, provincial and/or federalauthorities;

b) where necessary, review the situation withone or more independent engineers, toobtain advice as to the potential danger topublic safety or welfare and the remedialaction to be taken;

c) request the client/employer to take stepsnecessary to avoid danger to the publicsafety or welfare;

d) take such other action as deemed appropri-ate under the circumstances;

e) follow up on the action taken by all partiesto confirm that the problem has beenresolved.

6. Wherever possible, the Office of the Registrarshall maintain accurate records of all commu-nications with the reporting engineer, anyauthorities involved and the client/employer.