Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Page 1, Revised February 3, 2019
East Tennessee State University
Special Education
Professional Portfolio
Page 2, Revised February 3, 2019
East Tennessee State University
Special Education Professional Portfolio
The purpose of the portfolio evaluation is to monitor a teacher education candidate’s development and application of knowledge and skills in the Council for Special Education’s Standards. Teacher education candidates are responsible for submitting their portfolio each semester and for maintaining the original evaluation form with ongoing progress data within their professional portfolio. Candidates who do not submit a portfolio each semester will be required to attend an individual dispositions interview and individual portfolio review with the Special Education program faculty. With the exception of documents that are submitted during Residency II, all portfolio documents must have been submitted and received a score of Acceptable prior to registration for Residency II.
Portfolio Evaluation Sessions
A portfolio evaluation session will be scheduled end of each semester. It is your responsibility to inquire about the evaluation date and make arrangements to turn in your portfolio for evaluation. Notice of the evaluation date will be posted in room 415 and announced by your special education instructors. Your advisor can also provide you with information on the evaluation session and answer specific questions you may have about the portfolio. A digital copy of your portfolio evaluation form will be maintained by special education program faculty, and your assessment data will be maintained within an electronic spreadsheet and in the LiveText database.
How to Set Up Your Portfolio
Binder, Evaluation Form, and Cover Page Maintain your portfolio in a 3-ring binder that has a storage pocket on the front inside cover of the binder. The Special Education Program does not have regulations on size, color, or style of the binder. Do not use clear plastic sleeves to enclose your documents. Select the Evaluation and Feedback Forms for your program of studies (See Appendix A), and place the forms in the storage pocket in the inside cover of the binder. The first item in your portfolio will be the Cover Page found in Appendix B. Tabs Organize your portfolio with tabbed and labeled section dividers. The section label tabs should be clearly visible beyond the edge of the pages of documents within your portfolio. See Table 1, Special Education Program Assessments, to determine the program you are seeking, and include labeled tabs for the sections that are required in your program. Table 1. Special Education Program Assessments
Page 3, Revised February 3, 2019
Special Education Program Labeled Section Dividers for Assessments
Undergraduate and Graduate Comprehensive/Low Incidence Concentration
Professional Information Disposition Evaluation PRAXIS II Systematic Instruction Plan Planning Student Teaching Student Learning Person Centered Planning Video Self Modeling FBA
Undergraduate and Graduate Modified/High Incidence Concentration
Professional Information Disposition Evaluation PRAXIS II Reading Skills Assessment & Lesson Plan Planning (IEP) Student Teaching Student Learning Person Centered Planning Video Self Modeling Classroom Management
Undergraduate and Graduate Comprehensive/Low Incidence and Modified/High Incidence Concentrations
Professional Information Disposition Evaluation PRAXIS II Systematic Instruction Plan Reading Skills Assessment & Lesson Plan Planning Student Teaching Student Learning Person Centered Planning Video Self Modeling FBA Classroom Management
Graduate Early Childhood Special Education Concentration
Professional Information Disposition Evaluation PRAXIS II Content Knowledge Planning Video Self Modeling Student Teaching Student Learning Family Based Planning Single Subject Research
Page 4, Revised February 3, 2019
The first divider should be titled “Professional Information” and should contain the following: 1. Your resume 2. Your unofficial transcripts 3. Your Program of Studies with grades updated each semester 4. SAT, ACT, or Praxis I scores 5. Documentation of a valid First Aid/CPR certification
The second divider should be titled “Disposition Evaluation.” See Appendix C for the Disposition Evaluation Checklist that is appropriate for your Special Education program of studies. Place the Disposition Evaluation Checklist as the first item behind the Disposition Evaluation tab. Behind the checklist, place your Disposition Evaluation forms in the order that they are listed on the checklist. Follow the Professional Information and Disposition Evaluation sections with additional tabbed and labeled dividers, one tab for each assessment, placed in the notebook in the order they are listed under your Special Education Program of Studies in Table 1. You will complete the assessments through your courses and additional program requirements as you progress through your program of studies. A general description of each assessment is provided below under “Assessments.” Detailed information for required course assignments and related documentation will be provided by your special education course instructors. Candidates who have transferred in coursework from another university should consult with their Special Education advisor to determine appropriate course/document substitutions.
Documenting Your Progress through Program Assessments
Each semester, you will document your progress towards developing knowledge and skills in the Council for Exceptional Children’s (CEC) standards through the assessments that are listed in Table 1. Selected courses will have projects or assignments that you are required to post to LiveText. Within LiveText, your course instructor will evaluate your progress towards meeting program standards through an evaluation rubric. Your goal is to receive a score of Target (T) or Acceptable (A) on each assignment/program standard. For each of the listed assessments, print a hard copy of the completed evaluation rubric from LiveText and place the rubric, along with the graded assignment/project, behind the corresponding tab in your portfolio. For each rubric/documentation that you add to your portfolio: 1) place a sticky note on the rubric (to make it easier for faculty to locate and evaluate), and initial the appropriate Program Assessment in the left hand column of your portfolio evaluation form. Retain your scored evaluation form, and resubmit the same evaluation form for each portfolio evaluation session. Documenting a Score of Target (T) or Acceptable (A) Within Your Portfolio If you receive a score of Target (T) or Acceptable (A) on the initial evaluation of your assignment/project, place the LiveText rubric as the first item behind the corresponding tab. Place the graded course assignment(s) behind the LiveText rubric. Documenting and Improving a Score of Unacceptable (U) Within Your Portfolio
Page 5, Revised February 3, 2019
If you receive a score of Unacceptable (U) on the initial evaluation of your assignment/project, you must improve your score to at least the Acceptable (A) level by revising and improving your course assignment and submitting that revision within your portfolio at the next portfolio evaluation session. Place the following documents behind the corresponding tab in this order:
1. LiveText Rubric and other form(s) of evaluation that you received on the assignment 2. Completed “Assignment Feedback and Revisions” form (see Appendix D) that includes
a detailed description indicating how you have improved your assignment 3. The revised assignment with changes, additions, and/or improvements highlighted 4. The original graded document
Admission to Residency II With the exception of assessments related to the edTPA, a minimum score of Acceptable (A) is required for each program standard prior to enrollment in Residency II. Note that you must achieve an Acceptable score by the required deadline, which will be announced each semester. Failure to submit an improved document by the deadline and/or failure to achieve the minimum score of Acceptable (A) will result in the postponement of your Residency II experience.
Page 6, Revised February 3, 2019
Assessments Disposition Evaluations. Assessments of professional dispositional skills are conducted throughout a candidates’ program of studies. The Clemmer College of Education (CCOE) disposition evaluation reflects the CCOE conceptual framework. A Disposition Evaluation is administered early in the program of studies with the EDFN 2300 course (undergraduate students only) as well as in the Pre-residency, Residency I, and Residency II experiences. In addition, the special education program evaluates candidates’ dispositions each semester prior to the Residency II experience. Comprehensive/Low Incidence Undergraduate and Graduate Programs
Assessment Assessment Description
PRAXIS II
Praxis II Special Education Specific Licensure Area Exam is a key program assessment addressing Learner Development & Individual Learning Differences, Learning Environments, Assessment, and Instructional Planning & Strategies. This assessment is required to be stored in the student’s file in the Department of Teaching and Learning.
Content Knowledge
SPED 4587/5587 Systematic Instruction Plan is a key program assessment addressing Curricular Content Knowledge, and Instructional Planning & Strategies. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Planning (IEP)
SPED 4753, SPED 5755 Individualized Education Program is a key program assessment addressing Learner Development & Individual Learning Differences, Curricular Content Knowledge, Instructional Planning & Strategies, Professional Learning & Practice, and Collaboration. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Student Teaching
SPED 4850/5850 EdTPA, Task 1, Lesson & Assessment Planning is a key program assessment addressing Curricular Content Knowledge, Assessment, and Instructional Planning & Strategies. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Student Learning
SPED 4850/5850 EdTPA, Task 3, Curricular Content & Assessment is a key program assessment addressing Learner Development & Individual Learning Differences and Assessment. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Person Centered Planning
SPED 4302/5302 Person Centered Planning Project is a key program assessment addressing Professional Learning & Practice and Collaboration. Candidates utilize a person-centered planning model to develop a paper that highlights an individualized planning
Page 7, Revised February 3, 2019
process for a targeted student and family. This project includes an evaluation of personal beliefs and biases, family-educator collaboration during the planning process, and outlined outcomes that will impact the student’s education. The Person Centered Planning Project is submitted in LiveText.
Video Self Modeling
SPED 3445/5445 Video Self-Modeling Project is a key program assessment addressing Learner Development & Individual Learning Differences, and Learning Environments. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Functional Behavior Assessment
SPED 4767/5767 Functional Behavior Assessment Project is a key program assessment addressing Learning Environments, Assessment, Professional Learning & Practice, and Collaboration. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Modified/High Incidence Undergraduate and Graduate Programs
Assessment Assessment Description
PRAXIS II
Praxis II Special Education Specific Licensure Area Exam is a key program assessment addressing Learner Development & Individual Learning Differences, Learning Environments, Assessment, and Instructional Planning & Strategies.
Content Knowledge
SPED 4757/5757 Reading Skills Diagnostic-Prescriptive Assessment and Lesson Plan Assignment is a key program assessment addressing Learner Development & Individual Learning Differences, Assessment, and Instructional Planning & Strategies. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Planning (IEP)
SPED 4753/5753 Individualized Education Program is a key program assessment addressing Learner Development & Individual Learning Differences, Curricular Content Knowledge, Instructional Planning & Strategies, Professional Learning & Practice, and Collaboration. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Student Teaching
SPED 4850/5850 EdTPA, Task 1, Lesson & Assessment Planning is a key program assessment addressing Curricular Content Knowledge, Assessment, and Instructional Planning & Strategies. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Student Learning SPED 4850/5850 EdTPA, Task 3, Curricular Content & Assessment is a key program assessment addressing Learner
Page 8, Revised February 3, 2019
Development & Individual Learning Differences and Assessment. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Person Centered Planning
SPED 4302/5302 Person Centered Planning Project is a key program assessment addressing Professional Learning & Practice and Collaboration. Candidates utilize a person-centered planning model to develop a paper that highlights an individualized planning process for a targeted student and family. This project includes an evaluation of personal beliefs and biases, family-educator collaboration during the planning process, and outlined outcomes that will impact the student’s education. The Person Centered Planning Project is submitted in LiveText.
Video Self Modeling
SPED 3445/5445 Video Self-Modeling Project is a key program assessment addressing Learner Development & Individual Learning Differences, and Learning Environments. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Classroom Management
SPED 3400/5401 Classroom Management Project is a key program assessment addressing Learner Development & Individual Learning Differences, Learning Environments, Professional Learning & Practice, and Collaboration. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Early Childhood Special Education Graduate Program Assessment Assessment Description
PRAXIS II
Praxis II Special Education Specific Licensure Area Exam is a key program assessment addressing Learner Development & Individual Learning Differences, Learning Environments, Assessment, and Instructional Planning & Strategies.
Content Knowledge
Content Knowledge: SPED 5030 Practice-Based Paper is a key program assessment addressing Curricular Content Knowledge, Instructional Planning & Strategies, and Professional Learning & Practice. The candidate will select an evidence-based practice for children with disabilities in the 3-5 year old range and with approval of the instructor and develop a practice-based paper to gain an understanding of the level of evidence available to support the use of a given instructional practice with preschool children with developmental delays and disabilities. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Planning SPED 5020 Lesson Plan and Reflection is a key program assessment addressing Learner Development & Individual
Page 9, Revised February 3, 2019
Learning Differences, Curricular Content Knowledge, Assessment, Instructional Planning & Strategies, and Collaboration. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Video Self Modeling
5445 Video Self-Modeling Project is a key program assessment addressing Learner Development & Individual Learning Differences, and Learning Environments. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Student Teaching
SPED 5850 edTPA Instructional Unit Task 3 is a key program assessment addressing Learner Development & Individual Learning Differences, Curricular Content Knowledge, Assessment and Instructional Planning & Strategies, and Collaboration. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Student Learning
IEP is a key program assessment addressing Learner Development & Individual Learning Differences, Curricular Content Knowledge, Assessment, and Collaboration. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Family Based Planning
SPED 5040 Family Based Planning Project is a key program assessment addressing Learner Development & Individual Learning Differences, Assessment, and Professional Learning & Practice. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Video Self Modeling
5445 Video Self-Modeling Project is a key program assessment addressing Learner Development & Individual Learning Differences, and Learning Environments. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Single Subject Research
SPED 5401 Single Subject Research Project is a key program assessment addressing Curricular Content Knowledge, Assessment, and Instructional Planning & Strategies. This assessment is submitted in LiveText.
Page 10, Revised February 3, 2019
Appendix A
Portfolio Evaluation and Feedback Forms
Directions: Select the Evaluation Form and accompanying
Feedback Form for your program of studies. Comprehensive/Low Incidence Special Education Modified/High Incidence Special Education Comprehensive/Low Incidence and Modified/High Incidence
Special Education (for students who are seeking both licensure areas)
Early Childhood Special Education
Page 11, Revised February 3, 2019
Comprehensive/Low Incidence Special Education
Candidate’s Name: _________________________________________________________ E# _______________________________ Advisor: ________________________________________________
CEC Standards
Program Assessment
Learner Development & Individual Learning
Differences
Learning Environments
Curricular Content Knowledge Assessment Instructional Planning
& Strategies Professional Learning
& Practice Collaboration
State Test PRAXIS II
0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
Content SPED 4587/5587
Systematic Instruction Plan
0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
Planning SPED 4753/ 5755
Individualized Education Program
0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
Student Teaching SPED 4850/5851 EdTPA, Task 1
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
Student Learning SPED 4850/5851 EdTPA, Task 3
0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
SPED 4302/5302 Person Centered Planning Project
0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
SPED 3445/5445 Video Self-Modeling
Project
0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
SPED 4767/5767 Functional Behavior Assessment Project
0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
Page 12, Revised February 3, 2019
Feedback Comprehensive/Low Incidence Special Education
Portfolio Evaluator: Provide date and feedback for all assessments that received a “0” (Unacceptable) score and/or for any score of “1” (Acceptable) for which the candidate provided documentation for improvement but did not satisfy the criteria for a score of “2.”
State Test PRAXIS II
Content SPED 4587/5587
Systematic Instruction Plan
Planning SPED 4753/ 5755
Individualized Education Program
Student Teaching SPED 4850/5851 EdTPA, Task 1
Student Learning SPED 4850/5851 EdTPA, Task 3
SPED 4302/5302 Person Centered Planning Project
SPED 3445/5445 Video Self-Modeling
Project
SPED 4767/5767 Functional Behavior Assessment Project
Page 13, Revised February 3, 2019
Modified/High Incidence Special Education
Candidate’s Name: _________________________________________________________ E# _______________________________ Advisor: ________________________________________________
CEC Standards
Program Assessment
Learner Development & Individual Learning
Differences
Learning Environments
Curricular Content Knowledge
Assessment Instructional Planning & Strategies
Professional Learning & Practice
Collaboration
State Test PRAXIS II 0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
Content SPED 4757/5757 Reading Skills Assessment & LP Assignment
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
Planning SPED 4753/5755 IEP
P 0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
Student Teaching SPED 4850/5851, Ed TPA, Task 1
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
Student Learning SPED 4850/5851, Ed TPA Task 3
0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
SPED 4302/5302 Person Centered Planning Project
0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
SPED 3445/5445 VSM Project 0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
SPED 3400/5401 Classroom Management Project
0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
Page 14, Revised February 3, 2019
Feedback
Modified/High Incidence Special Education Portfolio Evaluator: Provide date and feedback for all assessments that received a “0” (Unacceptable) score and/or for any score of “1” (Acceptable) for which the candidate provided documentation for improvement but did not satisfy the criteria for a score of “2.”
State Test PRAXIS II
Content SPED 4757/5757 Reading Skills Assessment & LP Assignment
Planning SPED 4753/5753 IEP
Student Teaching SPED 4850/5851 edTPA, Task 1
Student Learning SPED 4850/5851 edTPA Task 3
SPED 4302/5302 Person Centered Planning Project
SPED 3445/5445 VSM Project
SPED 3400/5401 Classroom Management Project
Page 15, Revised February 3, 2019
Comprehensive/Low Incidence and Modified/High Incidence Special Education
Candidate’s Name: _________________________________________________________ E# _______________________________ Advisor: ________________________________________________
CEC Standards Program Assessment
Learner Development & Individual Learning
Differences
Learning Environments
Curricular Content Knowledge
Assessment Instructional Planning & Strategies
Professional Learning & Practice
Collaboration
State Test PRAXIS II 0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 Content SPED 4587/5587 Systematic Instruction Plan
0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
Content SPED 4757/5757
Reading Skills Assessment & LP Assignment
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
Planning SPED 4753/ 5753 Individualized Education Program
0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
Student Teaching SPED 4850/5851 EdTPA, Task 1
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
Student Learning SPED 4850/5851 EdTPA, Task 3
0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 SPED 4302/5302 Person Centered Planning Project
0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
SPED 3445/5445 Video Self-Modeling Project
0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
SPED 4767/5767 Functional Behavior Assessment Project
0
1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
SPED 3400/5401 Classroom Management Project
0
1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
0
1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
Page 16, Revised February 3, 2019
Feedback
Comprehensive/Low Incidence and Modified/High Incidence Special Education
Portfolio Evaluator: Provide date and feedback for all assessments that received a “0” (Unacceptable) score and/or for any score of “1” (Acceptable) for which the candidate provided documentation for improvement but did not satisfy the criteria for a score of “2.”
State Test PRAXIS II
Content SPED 4587/5587 Systematic Instruction Plan (Comprehensive)
Content SPED 4757/5757 Reading Skills Assessment & LP Assignment (Modified)
Planning SPED 4753/ 5753 Individualized Education Program
Student Teaching SPED 4850/5851 EdTPA, Task 1
Student Learning SPED 4850/5851 EdTPA, Task 3
SPED 4302/5302 Person Centered Planning Project
SPED 3445/5445 Video Self-Modeling Project
SPED 4767/5767 Functional Behavior Assessment Project
SPED 3400/5401 Classroom Management Project
Page 17, Revised February 3, 2019
Early Childhood Special Education
Candidate’s Name: _________________________________________________________ E# _______________________________ Advisor: ________________________________________________
CEC Standards Program Assessment
Learner Development & Individual Learning
Differences
Learning Environments
Curricular Content Knowledge
Assessment Instructional Planning & Strategies
Professional Learning & Practice
Collaboration
State Test Praxis II 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
Content SPED 5030 Practice-Based Paper
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 Planning SPED 5020 Lesson Plan & Reflection
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 SPED 5445 VSM Project 0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
Student Teaching SPED 5851 edTPA Instructional Unit Task 3
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
Student Learning IEP (Completed during the semester of SPED 5710)
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
SPED 5040 Family-Based Planning Project
0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 SPED 5401 Single Subject Research Project
0 1 2 0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
Page 18, Revised February 3, 2019
Feedback Early Childhood Special Education
Portfolio Evaluator: Provide date and feedback for all assessments that received a “0” (Unacceptable) score and/or for any score of “1” (Acceptable) for which the candidate provided documentation for improvement but did not satisfy the criteria for a score of “2.”
State Test Praxis II
Content SPED 5030 Practice-Based Paper
Planning SPED 5020 Lesson Plan & Reflection
SPED 5445 VSM Project
Student Teaching SPED 5851 edTPA Instructional Unit Task 3
Student Learning IEP (Completed during the semester of SPED 5710)
SPED 5040 Family-Based Planning Project
SPED 5401 Single Subject Research Project
Page 19, Revised February 3, 2019
Appendix B
Cover Page
Page 20, Revised February 3, 2019
East Tennessee State University
Special Education Professional Portfolio
Cover Page
Name: ________________________________________________ ETSU E#: _____________________________________________ Catalog Year: __________________________________________ Special Education Advisor: _______________________________ Degree or certification program: ______ B.S. in Special Education, Comprehensive Special Education Concentration ______ B.S. in Special Education, Modified Special Education Concentration ______ B.S. in Special Education, Comprehensive and Interventionist Special Education ______ M.Ed. in Special Education, Early Childhood Special Education Concentration ______ M.Ed. in Special Education, High Incidence Concentration (Modified) ______ M.Ed. in Special Education, Low Incidence Concentration (Comprehensive) Program Location: ______ ETSU On-campus ______ Off-campus cohort ______ On-line program (Early Childhood Special Education only)
Page 21, Revised February 3, 2019
Appendix C
Disposition Evaluation Checklists
Page 22, Revised February 3, 2019
Disposition Evaluation Checklist Undergraduate Initial License Programs
______ Special Education Program Disposition Evaluation Form, Semester 1
______ Special Education Program Disposition Evaluation Form, Semester 2
______ Special Education Program Disposition Evaluation Form, Semester 3
______ Special Education Program Disposition Evaluation Form, Semester 4
______ Educator Disposition Assessment (EDA) at Admission (self-assessment)
______ Educator Disposition Assessment (EDA), Residency I
______ Individual Disposition/Professional Development Plans (applies only to
candidates who are required to attend an Individual Disposition meeting with
the Special Education Disposition Committee)
Page 23, Revised February 3, 2019
Disposition Evaluation Checklist M.Ed., Special Education Initial License Concentrations
______ Special Education Program Disposition Evaluation Form, Semester 1
______ Special Education Program Disposition Evaluation Form, Semester 2
______ Special Education Program Disposition Evaluation Form, Semester 3
______ Educator Disposition Assessment (EDA) at Admission (self-assessment)
______ Educator Disposition Assessment (EDA), Residency I
______ Individual Disposition/Professional Development Plans (applies only to
candidates who are required to attend an Individual Disposition meeting with
the Special Education Disposition Committee)
Page 24, Revised February 3, 2019
Appendix D
Assignment Feedback and Revisions
Page 25, Revised February 3, 2019
Assignment Feedback and Revisions
If you receive a score of Unacceptable (U) on the initial evaluation of your assignment/project, you must improve your score to at least the Acceptable (A) level by revising and improving your course assignment and submitting that revision within your portfolio at the next portfolio evaluation session. Place the following documents behind the corresponding tab in this order: 1. LiveText Rubric and other form(s) of evaluation that you received on the assignment 2. Completed “Assignment Feedback and Revisions” form that includes a detailed description
indicating how you have improved your assignment 3. The revised assignment with changes, additions, and/or improvements highlighted 4. The original graded document Directions: Classify the reason(s) for receiving a score of Unacceptable (please check all that apply): ____ Content of the assignment/project that I submitted ____ Quality of the assignment/project that I submitted ____ Issues with format such as spelling, grammar, organization, use of APA ____ Following assignment or rubric directions ____ Other (please describe) _______________________________________ Classify the type of feedback or assistance you received and/or used to improve your assignment (please check all that apply): ____ My instructor provided written feedback in the form of a grading rubric or provided written
feedback on my assignment. ____ My instructor provided group feedback. ____ My Instructor provided me with individual feedback. ____ I sought assistance from an outside source (e.g., another faculty member, my advisor, my mentor
teacher, a classmate/study group). ____ I sought assistance from a university support, such as the writing lab or research librarian. ____ Other (please describe) _______________________________________ Provide a detailed description indicating how you have improved your assignment: