Upload
buiminh
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ECOLOGICAL Research Questions
1. How resilient or vulnerable are Mongolian pastoral
SESs to climate change?
2. How have ecological conditions changed along a
precipitation gradient since 1994-1995?
ECOLOGICAL HYPOTHESES
Climate change is causing a shift from equilibrium to
non-equilibrium systems
Species composition and production will have
changed more in the steppe and mountain/forest
steppe sites than in the desert-steppe sites in 2013
compared to 1994 and 1995.
Sampling Design 2013
Re-sampling 45 plots along a precipitation and
ecological zone gradient
Plots sampled in Jinst and Bayan Ovoo Soum,
Bayankhongor Aimag in 1994 and 1995 (Fernandez-Gimenez
and Allen-Diaz 1999, 2001)
15 plots in each of 3 ecological zones: desert-steppe
(Jinst), steppe and mountain/forest steppe (Bayan Ovoo)
Plots originally selected in 3 distance from water
categories: < 500 m, 500-2000 m, > 2000 m
Plot Set-Up 2013
Team leader has the GPS coordinates for the center
point of each plot.
Plot should be set up centered on that point—so that the
25-m mark on transect 3 (the middle transect) runs
through that point.
If the plot is on sloping ground, run the transects
perpendicular (up and down) the slope, not across it.
Plot Layout
Baseline
Tra
nsect
1
Tra
nsect
2
Tra
nsect
3
Tra
nsect
4
Tra
nsect
5
0 m
50 m
50 m
= Biomass sample quadrat
= Soil pit/profile
approximate location
Uphill
Downhill
Plot Meta-data and Rationale INDICATOR What does it mean? Why measure it?
GPS
coordinates
Spatial location of the plot (latitude
and longitude) recorded in decimal
degrees
•Documents exact plot location for
resampling or comparison with remotely
sensed imagery or other spatial data
Slope Deviation of the land surface from
level. Recorded in %.
• Important to site potential and plant
community
Aspect Dominant orientation relative to the
sun
• Important to site potential and plant
community
Landform Type of landform (e.g. valley, hills,
fan piedmont)
• Important to site potential and plant
community
Hillslope
position &
slope shape
Location of the plot relative to its
landscape position, and the shape of
the slope (convex, concave)
• Important to site potential and plant
community
Photo points Photograph of plot and landscape •Visual representation of plot location
and plant community
Dung counts Presence/absence of dung (by
species) in a 50 x 50 cm quadrat
(sheep & goats) or 1 x 1 m quadrat
(cattle & yaks, camel, horses)
•An independent measure of relative
grazing intensity at each sampling site
Soil Indicators (sub-set) and Rationale
INDICATOR What does it mean? Why measure it?
Soil Texture The mix of different particle
sizes in the soil (proportion of
sand, silt and clay)
•Soil texture and structure together determine
the capacity of a soil to hold and release air,
moisture and nutrients.
• Texture and structure are important
determinants of site potential (productivity)
Soil
Structure
The way soil particles are
organized—their shape (e.g.
platey, blocky, etc.)
Soil
Compaction
/Bulk
Density
Soil mass/soil volume •Compaction limits water infiltration and
increases runoff
•High soil compaction makes it hard for plants
to grow
•Compacted soils associated with management
(vehicles, trampling)
Soil Color Color of the soil as described
by standard soil color charts
• Indicator of organic matter and mineral
composition
•Darker colors associated with more organic
matter
Soil Surface Indicators and Rationale
INDICATOR What does it mean? Why measure it?
Pedoderm
Class
Describes the type of material
at the soil-air interface (e.g.
mineral soil, weak biological or
physical crust, etc.)
•Affects soil surface ability to absorb or
retain water or nutrients
•Affects which plants can establish and
grow
Resource
Retention Class
Describes spatial pattern of
persistent plant patches
•Affects ability of the site to retain
resources (soil, water, nutrients) and resist
erosion
Resource
Redistribution
Class
Describes extent and severity of
erosion or deposition
•Affects plant distribution and health
•Affects air, soil and water quality
Plant Indicators and Rationale INDICATOR (method) What does it mean? Why measure?
Total Plant Foliar
Cover
(Line Point Intercept)
Total leaf area in relation
to the area of ground (%)
•Vegetation abundance
•Protection from rainfall impact
(increased infiltration, decreased
runoff)
Plant Basal Cover
(Line Point Intercept)
Plant area at base of
plant
• Indicates vegetation ability to hold soil
in place (resistance to erosion)
Plant Cover by Species
(Line Point Intercept)
Area occupied by each
species in relation to total
area of ground (%)
•Species composition (proportion each
species contributes to total cover)
• Forage quality
•Degradation indicators
Basal Gap Intercept
(Gap Intercept)
Number and size of bare
ground patches
•Vulnerability to erosion (soil loss)
Plant Biomass
(5 Clipped sub-plots)
Amount of current year’s
growth
•Site productivity
•Amount of forage
•Nutritional analysis on clipped samples
possible
Plant Species Richness
(50 x 50 m plot search)
Number of species •Crude index of plant species diversity
• Important for adaptation
Line Point Intercept Method
1m 1.5m 2m 2.5m 3m
hit
no hit
hit no hit no hit
Percent total vegetative cover = (Σhits/total # of points) x 100
Percent cover for species X = (ΣX/total # of points) x 100
Line Point Intercept Method
1m 1.5m 2m 2.5m 3m
Pin Stipa
Thymus
Top Layer Code 1 Code 2 Code 3 Soil
Surface
Point 1 Stipa Thymus Thymus
Point 2 Stipa Litter Soil
Point 3 None Litter Rock
Litter Rock
Basal Gap Method
Measure gaps >20cm from base of one plant to
base of the next plant.
0 cm 50 cm 100 cm
Gap 15-45cm
No gap
< 20 cm No gap
< 20 cm
10 cm