Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
11/8/2013
1
The PROPPER Steps of Line Locating
Education and Training
of the
Line Locator
using the
Introduction: Randy Palaniuk – CAPULC
Presenter: Marvin Svoboda – SME
Southern Alberta Institute of Technology
CAPULC believes that:
Education, training, and assessment is crucial to increased safety, accuracy, and efficiency of the locate process.
An improved understanding between the stakeholders of the ground disturbance process will enhance the protection of infrastructure, people, and the environment.
Randy Palaniuk – President, CAPULC(Canadian Association of Pipeline and Utility Locating Contractors)
Randy Palaniuk – President, CAPULC(Canadian Association of Pipeline and Utility Locating Contractors)
CAPULC supports the initiative for the occupational designation of Underground Facility Locator in Alberta… the first in the world.
Address the need to formalize a recognized basic standard with education prerequisites to perform this occupation
Safety of the Locator, the infrastructure, the public, and the environment
11/8/2013
2
Marvin Svoboda – Subject Matter Expert
Southern Alberta Institute of Technology
Education and assessment of industry best practices is necessary to develop a standard for excellence in Line Locating, leading to a safer ground disturbance process.
Line Locator in oil & gas fields, plants, suburban, and urban environments, one‐call, and private locate applications
Subject Matter Expert – developing and applying Advanced Line Locating training and Safe Digging material for SAIT
Instructor, trainer, assessor of Line Locating best practices
What occurs AFTER the locate and even AFTER the
ground disturbance?
What occurs prior to the Locator and Ground Disturber meeting?
What occurs before the locate can begin?
What occurs during the locate process?
Locating and Marking
Allow enough time for PROPPER locates.
Locators face many obstacles in an increasingly challenging environment.
Obstacles
11/8/2013
3
Can range from an inconvenience to catastrophic.Consequences:
“there is no prospect that a tool will be developed that can simply and quickly locate all buried facilities...”
Solution:Improved locating hardware and software?
Solution:The human brain’s ability to analyze, interpret, adapt, and best determine the final results of the locate.
11/8/2013
4
“We must ensure adequate education… relative to the work undertaken and adequate training in the proper use of equipment.”
Solutions:Education of locating industry best practices, training, experience, and assessment.
Locator Training
The CGA minimum training guidelines and practices
• System design, prints, and technology
• Construction standards and practices
• Locating theory
• Equipment training
• Technique (field) training
• Daily locating operations
• Relationships and image
• Safety procedures
• Written and field testing
• Annual retesting
CGA Best Practices 4‐5
The initiative to recognize Underground Facility Locators as an Occupational Designation
Follow‐up presentation
by Ben Evans – Committee Vice‐chair
Line locating industry
Alberta training legislators
Locate training providers
11/8/2013
5
The PROPPER Phases of Line Locating
Preview locate request and facility information
Respond to locateOrganize the locate
Perform locate (includes marking)
Retain (file) documentation
Ensure locate documentation is communicated
Prepare locate documentation
Excerpts from the Common Ground Alliance Best Practices version 10, 2012.
review locate request and facility information
Carefully preview the information that is found in the locate request
documentation.
Research the available facility information
PPROPPER
review locate request and facility informationPCarefully preview the information that is found in the locate request documentation.
The Ground Disturber has requested a locate through:
• One‐call system
• Facility Owner/Operator
• Contract Locator ( or dispatch)
11/8/2013
6
review locate request and facility informationPCarefully preview the information of the infrastructure in the area of the proposed ground disturbance.
CGA Best Practices 4‐1, 6‐12, 6‐13
• Company‐specific databases
• Government/regulatory databases
• 3rd Party databases
• Previous locate information
Reliability of Infrastructure Records:
The Locator/Screener must understand the level of reliability of the infrastructure records.
CGA Best Practices 2‐14
espond to locateCommunicate with the Ground Disturber to determine nature of the ground disturbance.
PROPPER
R
• Excavation, trenchless, or penetration (post‐pounding)?
• Mechanical or non‐mechanical (non‐destructive)?
• Type of equipment used?
• Proposed depth?
• New construction , installation, or maintenance of existing infrastructure?
CGA Best Practices 3‐16
11/8/2013
7
Communicate with the Ground Disturber
The Locator/Screener must obtain the information regarding the proposed work from the Ground Disturber.
Communicate with the Ground Disturber
The Locator must correctly and accurately determine where the Ground Disturber intends to work (this may require a meeting at the work site).
Communicate with the Ground Disturber
Request that the Ground Disturber mark the proposed work area with white markings.
CGA Best Practices states:
“When the excavation site cannot be clearly and adequately identified {in the locate request}, the excavator designates the… area to be excavated using white premarking prior to the arrival of the locator.”
CGA Best Practices 5‐2
11/8/2013
8
Search and Research for Infrastructure Records:
The Locator is often the only person in a position to properly search for records of infrastructure.
When other sources have been exhausted, thorough digging may be required.
rganize locate
Determine the facilities.
Determine the search area.
Conduct a visual inspection.
OPROPPER
rganize locateODetermine the facilities that are required to be located based on the proposed ground disturbance.
• Are there any visual indications of the facilities?
• Determine the access points to apply a signal to the facilities?
• Are the facilities conductive or non‐conductive?
• What construction method was used to install the facility?
• How deep is the facility anticipated to be?
CGA Best Practices 2‐5
11/8/2013
9
rganize locateOConduct a visual inspection to determine the hazards within the search area and the procedures to mitigate the hazards.• Site background data and familiarization
• Determining the hazards associated with the locate
• Safety procedures to control the hazards
• Emergency response plan
CGA Best Practices 4‐6
rganize locateOWhat procedures are required to conduct this locate?
The qualified Locator, with training, experience, and understanding…
Is capable of selecting the necessary procedures required to conduct the locate.
• Direct
• Indirect
• Sweeps
• Passive
• Measurements
rganize locateOWhat tools and equipment are required to conduct this locate?
The qualified Locator, with education, training, experience, and understanding…
Is capable of selecting the necessary tools and equipment required to conduct the locate.
• Direct clamps
• Induction clamp
• Broadcast induction
• Rodding tools
• Survey
11/8/2013
10
rganize locateOUnderstanding the entire system leads to a more
complete and accurate locate of the buried facilities.
erform locate
Use the appropriate procedures and equipment .
Adequately mark the buried facilities.
PPROPPER
erform locateP Use the appropriate procedures and equipment to
conduct the required locate of the buried facilities.
Some locating education courses and even best practices suggest that the direct hook‐up method is the BEST method to apply a locatable signal to a buried facility.
The CGA Best Practices states:
“The preferred method of actively applying a signal onto a facility is to use direct connection.”
This is not necessarily the case.
CGA Best Practices 4‐12(A)
11/8/2013
11
erform locatePWhen you hire a professional to build or maintain your plumbing or electrical system in your home…
You expect the professional to be TRAINED and EXPERIENCED in how to use the APPROPRIATE TOOLS for the various TASKS at hand!
erform locatePThe CGA Best Practices, regarding locating technologies, states:
“It is important to note that these technologies are not applicable in all areas or conditions...”
And…
“Users…should have the degree of knowledge and training required to operate the associated equipment and/or to interpret the results.”
CGA Best Practices 4‐12(B)
erform locatePThe Solution:
The trained and experienced Locator is the only person that can determine which method or procedure to use in any given locating scenario.
Multiple methods and procedures may be required until the desired results are reached.
11/8/2013
12
erform locate – Signal ApplicationP• Application of a locatable signal to a facility
o Direct, inductive clamp, indirect (induction or broadcast)
• Effective signal level applied to the facility
o High, medium, or low
• Effective signal circuit paths
o Primary circuit grounding, conductivity of the facility, multiple return paths
• Gain (sensitivity) selection
o Manual selection (effective control? Or tedious?)
o Automatic gain selection (convenient? Or lack of control?)
o Semi‐automatic selection (best of both worlds? Or misleading?)
• Receiver feedback
o Audible feedback (processed? Or raw?)
o Visual feedback (convenient? Or heavily processed? Time lag?)
erform locate – Receiver feedbackP
• Trace and verify
o Trace the signal to the next accessible, or verifiable point
o Retrace the facility from the next point to the original point
• Multiple line checks
o Parallel line checks
o Proximity line checks
o Surface features parallel checks
erform locate – Basic proceduresP
These methods are the ones where you will find the GOLD.
11/8/2013
13
Passive vs. Active signal locating
The CGA Best Practices regarding active and passive signal locating, states:
“When locating electromagnetically, active/conductive locating is preferable to passive/inductive locating.”
erform locate – Alternative methodsP
These may be used as a starting point, or perhaps as a follow‐up scan, but should NEVER be used as the sole
locating procedure.
CGA Best Practices 4‐12(A)
• Cathodic protection signal
• Radio mode
• Power mode
erform locatePSweeping for unknowns
• Various sweeping procedures based on the ground disturbance and the search area
• Used to identify unknowns
• Not intended to replace other locate procedures
erform locatePComprehensive Locates
CGA Best Practices 4‐4
The CGA has recognized the advantages of a comprehensive locate of a work area reducing the likelihood of errors and resulting damage.
The advantages include:
• Improved responsive service
• Improved communication
• Improved locating and marking through distinction
• Comprehensive mapping
11/8/2013
14
erform locatePSystematic Locating
erform locatePAbnormal Operating Conditions
• Every locate may include some type of AOC
• Multiple methods and procedures
• Multiple types of equipment
A diligent Locator uses knowledge and experience to pursue solutions to problem locates.
erform locateP Adequately mark the buried facilities.
• Clear communication
• Colour codes
CGA Best Practices
4‐13
11/8/2013
15
erform locateP Adequately mark the buried facilities.
• Surface and raised markers
• Appropriate marking materials
• Company identifiers
• Facility identifiers
CGA Best Practices 4‐13
erform locateP Are all of the target lines in the work area located? Are all of the lines in the extended search area
located? Are all of the other buried facilities located?
(comprehensive locate) Are all of the lines clearly identified and marked?
Check the locate performed
repare locate documentationPPROPPER
Review and verify locates.
Documentation must be an accurate record that eliminates confusion
11/8/2013
16
repare locate documentationPDocumentation must include:
Clear land location, address, or position
Identifiable surface features
Clear identification of the (target) buried facilities in relation to surface features, the work area, and other buried facilities
Description of the buried facilities
CGA Best Practices 6‐8
repare locate documentationPA Locator must provide specifics regarding discrepancies.
Note discrepancies in locate findings from:
• Existing records
• Surface indicators (signage, markers)
• Other locate findings
CGA Best Practices 6‐8
nsure documentation is communicatedEA Locator should review the documentation with the Ground Disturber.
• Sketch
• Written documentation
• Hardcopy and walk‐through
• E‐mail and phone call
• Note the proximity or conflicts of facilities with the work area
• Note any discrepancies
• Need for additional locates
PROPPER
11/8/2013
17
nsure documentation is communicatedE
CGA Best Practices 4‐2
A Locator must provide information for updating records.
The Locator should notify the Facility Owner/Operator in a timely manner and include the following information:
• Nature of the error or omission
• Details regarding the found or missing facility
• Sketch indicating the error and correction in relation to other facilities and/or surface features
nsure documentation is communicatedE
CGA Best Practices 4‐2
Keep communication channels open
The Locator should invite the Ground Disturber to inform the Locator if there are any discrepancies discovered during the excavation process.
A follow‐up locate may be necessary to update records.
etain documentation Provide documentation to Facility
Owner/Operator
• Local operator and field office
• Construction and maintenance office
• Corporate office
• Use locate information to update as‐built records
R
Maintain files at locate office
• Must be readily accessible to future locate personnel
CGA Best Practices 2‐11, 5‐28
PROPPER
11/8/2013
18
“We must ensure adequate education… relative to the work undertaken and adequate training in the proper use of equipment.”
Solution:Education of locating industry best practices, training, experience, and assessment.
“there is no prospect that a tool will be
developed that can simply and quickly locate all buried
facilities...”
The PROPPER Steps of Line Locating
Questions:
Education and Training
of the
Line Locator
using the
The PROPPER Steps of Line Locating
Advanced Line Locator Certificate Program
Safe Digging Certificate
11/8/2013
19
Status of theUnderground Facility LocatorOccupational Designationapplication in Alberta
Committee Vice‐chair – Ben Evans