Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Supreme
Allied
Commander
Transformation
LGEN Karlheinz Viereck DCOS Joint Force Trainer
Education & Training
19 JUN 2012
www.e-NATO.net
2
Partner Education & Training
Key Principles
x + n Contribution
Capability Building
Means for Dialogue
Parity
Political Guidance
KEY PRINCIPLES
Effective, Efficient,
Affordable
Systemic Top-Down
Guidance
3
KEY PRINCIPLES
Education & Training
Key Principles • Requirements by SACEUR (SAGE)
• Developed Training Integration Plan
• Developed Individual Training Education
Programme
• Developed Education and Training
Opportunities Catalogue (ETOC)
• Created DASHBOARD (Management
Software) for Education & Training
Institutions
• Re-energised NATO Training Group
• Key roles for partners
• e-Learning established
• Incorporated 4 NETFs, 16 COEs, 24 PTCs
and 2 National Colleges in NATO training x + n Contribution
Capability Building
Means for Dialogue
Parity
Political Guidance
Effective, Efficient,
Affordable
Systemic Top-Down
Guidance
4
Chicago Defence Package
NATO Defence Planning Process (NDPP):
Enhance, associate Smart Defence and CFI
Connected Forces Initiative (CFI)
Education, Training and Exercises
ACT to make recommendations
Practical cooperation with UN, AU, EU
Commitment to transparency
Technology
CNAD and C3B to make recommendations
Partner Association
DPPC to make recommendations
Measures:
Increase inclusion of partners
Including the NRF
Expectation of reprocity
5
1. Aligning all aspects of
NATO E&T in a holistic way
Goal:
Fully coordinated and structured system under a single authority
Status:
Individual Training and Education Programme (ITEP)
Military Training and Exercise Programme (MTEP)
Partnership Goals
Defence Education Enhancement Programme (DEEP)
Governing Body (IS – IMS – ACT – nations)
Functional Clearing House (IS lead)
NATO Training Group (ACT lead)
Training and Education Enhancement Programme (TEEP)
Requirements:
Core Professional Training
TEEP to merge/integrate with NATO Education & Training
6
Education & Training
(-2011)
National Training Institutions
NATO Education & Training Institutions
Size
varying
between
nations
NATO Requirements
National Requirements
7
National Add-on for National Requirements
Expanded
Education & Training
NATO Education & Training Institutions
NATO Requirements
Core Professional
Education & Training
8
National Add-on for National Requirements
Expanded E&T
(CIMIC)
NATO Education & Training Institutions
NATO Requirements
Core Professional
Education & Training
9
2. Implement Training
Integration Plan
Goal:
Simplified structure to coordinate the delivery of all E&T
requirements
Status:
SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on ETEE
‘Training Synchronization Conference’ as THE Conference for
Nations’ approval for upcoming E&T Plan
Requirements:
NATO Force Structure requirements to be incorporated
Partner countries requirements to be incorporated
Nations’ requirements to be incorporated
ACT reviewing all Education and Training Boards / Working
Groups
10
SAGE (SACEUR’s
Annual Guidance on
ETEE)
Board I
Board II
Training Synch Conf
Board III
MC Endorsement
& NAC Approval
of Non NATO Entities’
Activities
Training Integration Plan MAY 2012
Sep Nov/Dec Feb Mar Jun
Requirements Coordination Final Product Nations’
Consent
11
SAGE (SACEUR’s
Annual Guidance on
ETEE)
Board I
Board II
Training Synch Conf
Board III
MC Endorsement
& NAC Approval
of Non NATO Entities’
Activities
Training Integration Plan
Partner Participation
Sep Nov/Dec Feb Mar Jun
Requirements Coordination Final Product Nations’
Consent
Training Synch Conf
Military
Cooperation
Coordination
(MCC)
Workshop
Apr
12
Board III
Board II
SAGE (SACEUR’s
Annual Guidance on
ETEE)
Board I
Training Synch Conf
MC Endorsement
& NAC Approval
of Non NATO Entities’
Activities
Training Integration Plan JUL 2012
Sep Nov Feb Mar Jun
Requirements Coordination Final
Product
Nations’
Consent
G7 Conf
Air
Training
& Ex
Group
(ATEG)
Fleet
COM’s
Conf
E&T
Conf
ACT
Aug/Sep
13
Requirements Definition Development + Programming Approval
Training Integration Plan Future
MC Endorse- ment &
NAC Approval
of Non NATO Entities’
Activities
Nations:
NATO
Exercise
Programmers Conference
+
Individual
Training
Managers Conference
Aug/Sep
BRSG
Jun
SAGE
Sep
IPB/ MPB
I
(with
EBUG
EPMB)
Sep/
Oct
IPB/ MPB
II
(with
EPMB)
Nov/
Dec
IPB/ MPB
III
(with
EBUG
EPMB)
Mar
Training Synch Conf
Feb
SG NTG
NTEC*
NITEC*
* Note: NATO
only & NATO-
Partner
Sessions
Abbreviations:
(1) BRSG = Bi-SC Requirements Steering Group (7) IPB = ITEP Planning Board
(2) SAGE = SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on ETEE (8) MPB = MTEP Planning Board
(3) ATEG = Air Training and Exercise Group (9) EBUG = Exercise Budget User’s Group
(4) MEWG = Maritime Exercise Working Group (10) EPMB = Evaluation Planning and Management Board
(5) SG NTG = Steering Group NTG (11) NTEC = NATO Training and Exercise Conference
(6) RA / DH = Requirements Authority / Department Head (12) NITEC = NATO Individual Training and Education Conference
Requirements Definition Development + Programming Approval
Military
Cooperation
Coordination
(MCC)
Workshop
Apr
Land: G7 Conf
Air:
ATEG
Mar:
MEWG
Individual
Training:
RA / DH
COI
MTGs
Aug/Sep
14
Training Integration Plan Future
MC Endorse- ment &
NAC Approval
of Non NATO Entities’
Activities
Nations:
NATO
Exercise
Programmers Conference
+
Individual
Training
Managers Conference
Aug/Sep
ETEE Policy Working Group
Requirements Definition
SAGE
Sep
BRSG
Jun
IPB/ MPB
I
(with
EBUG
EPMB)
Sep /
Oct
IPB/ MPB
II
(with
EPMB)
Nov/
Dec
IPB/ MPB
III
(with
EBUG
EPMB)
Mar
Training Synch Conf
Feb
SG NTG
NTEC*
NITEC*
* Note: NATO
only & NATO-
Partner
Sessions
Abbreviations:
(1) BRSG = Bi-SC Requirements Steering Group (7) IPB = ITEP Planning Board
(2) SAGE = SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on ETEE (8) MPB = MTEP Planning Board
(3) ATEG = Air Training and Exercise Group (9) EBUG = Exercise Budget User’s Group
(4) MEWG = Maritime Exercise Working Group (10) EPMB = Evaluation Planning and Management Board
(5) SG NTG = Steering Group NTG (11) NTEC = NATO Training and Exercise Conference
(6) RA / DH = Requirements Authority / Department Head (12) NITEC = NATO Individual Training and Education Conference
Development + Programming Approval
Military
Cooperation
Coordination
(MCC)
Workshop
Apr Aug/Sep?
Land: G7 Conf
Air:
ATEG
Mar:
MEWG
Individual
Training:
RA / DH
COI
MTGs
Aug/Sep
15
Exercise STEADFAST
JUNCTURE (SFJE)
2010 2011 2012
PCM in NAC
Dec11 – Jun12+
TIP
Sep10 –
Feb11
SFJE
EXPE
C
18/19
Oct
11
SFJE
IPC
24/25
Jan
12
SFJE
MPC
21-24
May
12
SFJE
OpPl
2a&b
11Jun-
6Jul
12
SFJE
FCC
11-13
Sep
12
SFJE
Ex
3b
27Oct-
08Nov
12
16
3. Alignment of NATO E&T with
International Educational Standards
Goal:
Utilise all available NATO and National E&T assets
Status:
Phase I: Defining the structure and new processes:
Educational Goals
Educational Standards
Quality Assurance
Education and Training Programming for E&T Institutions
(NATO, COE, PTEC)
Requirements:
Phase II: Gain experience and feedback
Phase III: Install a systematic aligned approach
17
Education & Training
Requirements and Programming
Training Requirements Analysis
(Operationalization)
Training Needs Analysis
Strategic Training Plan
Operational
Commanders’
Performance
Gaps
Training Management System
Political / Military Direction & Guidance
Requirements
Authority
Department
Head
18
E&T Management
PSO
Requirements Authority
Department Head FINCENT
Module (Excerpt) E&T Institution
Course (Excerpt) E&T Institution
19
4. Implement Training
Management System
Goal:
Fully managed on-line, real-time E&T system to support a holistic
Training Management System
Status:
Education & Training Opportunities Catalogue (ETOC): Sep 12
eITEP1) Initial Operational Capability: Sep 12
eITEP Final Operational Capability: Sep 13
“old” exercise management tool online: Sep 13
E&T institution management tool DASHBOARD: Sep12
Requirements:
2013: New exercise management tool (eMTEP)
2014: Automatic links to eMTEP, ePRIME and APMS (Allied
Personnel Management System)
1) electronic Individual Training and Education Programme (eITEP)
20
5. Enhanced e-Learning
Goal:
Develop NATO e-Learning capabilities
Status:
e-Learning Concept published
ADL technical standard published
VBS World as platform for Serious Games
Immersive Learning programme
Supporting OCEAN SHIELD (“Boarders Ahoy”)
Supporting ISAF (“VCAT”)
ACT-UN course on UNSCR 1612 (June)
Requirements:
Immersive Learning for new HQ personnel in NATO HQs
Resources (costs / personnel) to implement enhanced e-Learning
21
6. Enhanced Exercises
Goal:
Retain and extend interoperability of NATO & Partner forces
Status:
Current focus on NCS HQ NRF training
Intensive talks with High Readiness Force Corps and
Component Commands
Requirements:
Nations to support increased LIVEXs with forces and funds
Increase coordination of NATO and National LIVEX planning
22
7. Tailor Exercises for
Purpose
Goal:
Increased number of exercises
Status:
NATO STEADFAST Exercises have trained on the
Comprehensive Approach
Multi-level exercises have led to a dilution of training
Requirements:
More ‘kinetic’ training necessary to cope with Lessons Learned
Overhaul the content of exercises, returning training to the core
competences and increase kinetic exercise opportunities
Specialist exercises (TBMD, Cyber etc.)
25
10. Framework for use of
National and Partner exercise
infrastructure
Goal:
Make best use of available NATO and National exercise facilities
and infrastructure
Status:
No links between NATO Exercise Centres and Regional HQs
No oversight of available infrastructure
No common framework for their use
Requirements:
Requirements gathering ongoing
26
Connected Forces Initiative:
Technology
Educational Technology Supports the transfer, creation and evaluation of either:
Knowledge, Skills or Attributes
e-Learning
Simulators
Administrative Technology Coordination, synchronization and oversight of E&T products
eITEP
eMTEP
ePRIME
LMS Dashboard
Deployable Technology Operational area, in direct support of the warfighter
Afghan Mission Network
27
Summary – Conclusion –
Way Ahead
The envisaged Future E&T Concept:
Supports Sec Gen’s CFI.
Identifies E&T end states.
Takes effectiveness, efficiency and affordability into account.
Ensures the fulfillment of requirements for NATO nations and partners.
Transformation of NATO E&T will:
Be under a single authority.
Be more agile, flexible and affordable
Prepare NCS / NFS / partners for future challenges
Balance quality, requirements with available resources
The future NATO E&T system aims to
Better coordinate NATO / National / Partner E&T activities.
Increase accessibility and a global approach via on-line, real-time
coordination.