Upload
leilani-tillman
View
20
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Effects of Display Position and Control Space Orientation on User Preference and Performance. Presented at CHI2006, April, 2006 Daniel Wigdor Chia Shen Clifton Forlines Ravin Balakrishnan. Problem. Motivation. Issues. Display Position. Control Space Orientation. Related Work. HCI: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Effects of Display Position and Control Space Orientation on User Preference and Performance
Presented at CHI2006, April, 2006
Daniel WigdorChia Shen
Clifton ForlinesRavin Balakrishnan
2
Problem
3
Motivation
4
Issues
Display Position
Control Space Orientation
5
Related Work
HCI:• Nacenta et al. (2005)
Psychology:• Hemholtz (1866), Stratton (1897): prism glasses• Cunningham (1989)• Cunningham & Welch (1994)
6
Our Goals
Find:• Preferred:
– Display position(s)– Control orientation(s) for each position
• Optimal:– Display position(s)– Control orientation for each position
• Performance penalties
Recommend:– Ideal display position(s)– Ideal control orientation(s)
7
Two Experiments: Preference, Performance
8
Two Experiments: Preference, Performance
9
Task
• Docking task:
10
Study 1: All About Preference
• Setup:– Perform task at all 8 display positions– Participant sets control orientation
• Measure:– Task time & error rate– Control orientation chosen by the participant– Participants’ preferred display position
• Tells us:– Optimal display position– Preferred control orientation for each position– Performance at preferred control orientation
11
Design
• 8 participants (all right handed)• 8 display positions• 40 trials per position• Participant-set control orientation
+
12
Results: Display Position Preference
Participant Most Preferred Least Preferred
1 N S
2 NE S
3 NE & NW S
4 NW S
5 NE S
6 NE SW
7 NE & NW SE & S
8 N SW
• 6 of 8 participants prefer NE or NW position
13
Results: Control Orientation Preference
14
Results: Control Orientation Preference
15
Results: Control Orientation Preference
16
Study 2: All About Performance
• Setup:– Perform task at all 8 display positions– For each position, perform task at 8 control orientations
• Measure:– Task time & error rate– Drag paths
• Tells us:– Optimal control orientation for each position– Penalty for not meeting optimal– Display position and control orientation for shared displays
17
Design
• 8 participants (all right handed)• 4 display positions each (8 total)• 4 fixed control orientations each (8 total)• 80 trials per position
+
18
Results: Performance
19
Results: Performance
20
Screen North
21
Screen North
22
Screen North
23
Screen North
24
Results: Performance
25
Results: Performance
26
Design Recommendations
1 & 2
S
SE
E
NE
N
NW
W
SW
27
Design Recommendations
1 & 2
S 53%
SE 32%
E 62%
NE 46%
N 62%
NW 36%
W 41%
SW 38%
28
Design Recommendations
1 & 2 1 & 3
S 53%
SE 32%
E 62%
NE 46%
N 62%
NW 36%
W 41%
SW 38%
29
Design Recommendations
1 & 2 1 & 3
S 53% 32%
SE 32% 38%
E 62% 18%
NE 46% 75%
N 62% 32%
NW 36% 38%
W 41% 18%
SW 38% 75%
30
Design Recommendations
1 & 2 1 & 3 1,2,3
S 53% 32%
SE 32% 38%
E 62% 18%
NE 46% 75%
N 62% 32%
NW 36% 38%
W 41% 18%
SW 38% 75%
31
Design Recommendations
1 & 2 1 & 3 1,2,3
S 53% 32% 53%
SE 32% 38% 38%
E 62% 18% 62%
NE 46% 75% 75%
N 62% 32% 62%
NW 36% 38% 46%
W 41% 18% 62%
SW 38% 75% 75%
32
Design Recommendations
1 & 2 1 & 3 1,2,3 1,2,3,4
S 53% 32% 53%
SE 32% 38% 38%
E 62% 18% 62%
NE 46% 75% 75%
N 62% 32% 62%
NW 36% 38% 46%
W 41% 18% 62%
SW 38% 75% 75%
33
Design Recommendations
1 & 2 1 & 3 1,2,3 1,2,3,4
S 53% 32% 53% 183%
SE 32% 38% 38% 273%
E 62% 18% 62% 183%
NE 46% 75% 75% 273%
N 62% 32% 62% 183%
NW 36% 38% 46% 273%
W 41% 18% 62% 183%
SW 38% 75% 75% 273%
34
Acknowledgements
• Dr. Helen Cunningham• Experimental participants• John Barnwell • Edward Tse• CHI meta-reviewer• ARDA
35
Questions?